ML24086A370

EIP-ZZ-A0001, Rev. 24, Emergency Response Organization

ML24086A370
Person / Time
Site:	Callaway
Issue date:	01/09/2024
From:	Ameren Corp, Union Electric Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Document Control Desk
References
EIP-ZZ-A0001 R024
Download: ML24086A370 (1)

Text

PROCEI)URE REVIEW FORM (PRF) 1.0 Initiation Initiator: Jeremy Morton Date: 01/09/2024 Procedure Dept:

EP Document #: EIP-ZZ-A0001 New Rev. #

024

Title:

Emergency Response Organization Level of Use:

EjContiriuous QRefcrence 1nformation OMultiple EJN/A 2O Reason for Change/Description of Change List commitments, CRc, eB Change Requests QERS, P/ant Mods etc. and record numbeis here. I CR 202308778. Updated multiple steps for clarity and reformatted procedure to align with CaHaway Standards.

See SOC for more details.

Q()flhiflUed c 3.0.

Document Disposition UTemp Change New Document flMajor Reision Minor Revision jcancellation EElAdrninistrative Correction DpJ1eador Designated Approverrequired for Adrninistrativ oi t1i tii 4.0 Interim Approval (Temp. Change Only,)

Temp. Change #:

Expiration Date:

int Supt isoi tignatuiJP1N/Ddft)

SRt) tSgnature/NWDate)

5.0 Comments

Continued: c:i Re iews and Signatures (iVOT requiredfor Administrative Corrections)

Revkw Reqiilretl

!hpI PIN Signature Date CAt)139 Attached Preparer 0

icqqo7

&;/ :1) 1JL /t)/iO Technical Review p p/çg jj/

LI Yes TechnicaiReview Q L)

_ c L1Y No Addl Review U

Yes LJ No Addl Review LiYes LI No EjAdditional Reviews (See Attached CAOI39Jbnns).

Number of additional CAO 1 39s:

i;pe Coordinator - PIN Signature Date CA 0139 Attached ElValidation JUYes No 50.59 Review CA25 1 0 UCA2S I 1 EICA25 I 2 / DN/A (perAJ-ZZ-OOI.I3)

P J U cteeier JeiulatI PIN Reviewer Initial 7 PJV (Dept. Head or Designated Approver) Is a Change Management Plan required?

OYes 1No tiF YlS, attach CA2773 or (A2774)

Is a Cross-Disciplinary review required?

EYes No 7.0 4pproval (Either apJEOVat tflUSt be qual(/iecI as PA TAPVI? (ir P1 TG/IPR in Qua1krster)

Senior Director Nuclear Operations Approval tper APA-Z/-OOlOt)

ORC is required in accordance with APA-ZZ-0009 I ti Ip{1tmLmt IIei I Final Review and Approval ORC Meeting:

l99 t/3o/

Dept. head or Designated \\ppier Senior Director Nuclear Operations

( Signature/PIN/I)ate)

(Signature/PIN/Date)

Vote. Pac ?pr47v1dc tictnientu tc coopicte t;:;/)I?1 atidei be distr:Ied A1900001 2 35

\\210t)062 669 M1900001 Pag I 012 CAOt)3 AP77flh11fl1 Rev. 002

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION Address the questions below for all aspects of the activity. If the answer is YES for any portion of the activity, apply the identified procedures to that portion of the activity Note that it is not unusual to have more than one process apply to a given activity. Refer to Section 4 ofthe 10 CFR 50.59 Resource Manual (RM) and the instructions on pages 5-6 for additional guidance.

Activity/Document Number: EIP-ZZ-A0001 Revision Number:J_____

Title:

EIPZZ-AOOO1. Rey.

Brief Description of activity (what is being changed and why):

IfYES, no further 50.59 (or 72.48) review beyond this Applicability Determination (AD) is required, but

Response

complete the remainder ofthis form.

Identif the applicable 50.59/72.48 YES Evaluation Log No., License Amendment No., or applicable idocument number.

Document #

Response

See Section 4.2.1 ofthe RM.

NO L YES IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-OO 10$

and FDP-ZZ-00 103.

If YES, process per APA-ZZ-001 08 YES and GDP-ZZ-00600 and related facility or procedure change programs.

If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 I 0$

i:: YFS and SDP-ZZ-00030 for Security Plan and related facility or procedure change programs.

APA-ZZ-OO 143 A170.OO1O

• 0 3 3. 1. Revised Callaway Training Course Catalog to Learning Management System

5. 1. 1. Removed T68.0030.6/8 a

5.1.2. a. Removed step a. tERO Positions will have a review completed to determine the validity ofthe current Position Analysis. Changed step b to a and c to b 5.1.2 a. Add new verbiage.

5.1.2.c. Added bullet Self-guided review oflesson plan and applicable procedures followed by discussion with EP staff or Position Owner.

5.2.3. Revised step to I? The Recovery Manager (RM), Emergency Coordinator (EC), and Dose Assessment Coordinator (DAC) require Drill Certification as part of initial training. This is also indicated in the Learning Management System (LMS).

6.1.3 Added new reference, APA-ZZ-00925 Appendix A, Auto-Generated Qualification Lapse Messages.

6. 1.4 Added new reference, CTM-EP, Callaway Training Manual-Emergency Preparedness.

II.

Does the proposed activity fall within the scope of an activity that has been previously approved by the NRC or for which a 50.59/72.48 Screen or evaluation has already been performed?

(See Section 4.2 ofthe RM.)

NO III.

Does the proscd activity involve a change to the:

1.

Technical Specifications or the Renewed Operating License?

(SL 10 CfR5O 90 1 2.

Quality Assurance Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.54(a).)

NO 3.

Security Plan which also includes the Cyber Security Plan?

NO (See 10 CFR 50.54(p).)

Page 1 CA2510 Rev. 005

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued) 4.

Radiological Emergency Response Plan (RERP) or Emergency Action Levels (EALS)? (See 10 CFR 50.54(q).)

Note: Ifyour proposed change alters a RERP implementing procedure [any EIP-ZZ-XXXX], equipment identified as important to emergency response [refer to KDP-ZZ-00013J, or could alter response time, staffmg, or other items covered in the 16 Planning Standards or in Appendix E to Part 50.47(b) [refer to KDP-ZZ00400J, answer this question YES.

UNO EYES If YES, process per APA-ZZ-00 108 and KDP-ZZ-00400 for RERP and related facility or procedure change programs.

IfYES, process APA-ZZ-00356 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.

5.

1ST Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(f).)

NO EJYES If YES, process per EDPZZ-01003 for ASME code compliance and related facility or procedure change programs.

7.

Fire Protection Program? (See Operating License Condition 2.C(5).)

8.

Storage Cask Certificate of Compliance (CoC), including appendices?

(See 10 CFR 72.244.)

9.

Does the proposed activity impact other programs (e.g.,

the ODCM) that are controlled by regulations, the Operating License (including Orders and License Conditions) or the Technical Specifications? (See Section 4.2.1 oftheRM.)

Iv.

Does the proposed activity involve:

1. Maintenance which restores SSCs to their original (as designed) condition?

(See 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4).)

See FP Screening questions in EDP

%2-01044. If any ofthe screening NO C YES questions are answered YES, a Fire Protection review is needed in accordance with EDP-ZZ-04044.

IF YES, then contact Regulatory NO L YES Affairs/Licensing to determine next stcps If YES, indicate the applicable NO YES program in Brief Description Section.

6.

151 Program Plan? (See 10 CFR 50.55a(g).)

NO Q YES NO EIYES Note: Ifthe maintenance is on ISFSI or cask-related items, the Maintenance Rule does NOT apply, and the activity is subject to a 10 CFR 72.48 Screen on a CA3 145.

Response

$ee Section 4.2.2 ofthe RM If YES, process change per APA-ZZ-00 1 0 1 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00320/330/340 for Maintenance activities.

APA-ZZ-00143 Page 2 A170.OO1O CA2510 Rev. 005

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)

If YES, process per APA-ZZ-OO1O1 for procedure changes or APA-ZZ-00605 for facility changes NO C YES ° Procedurally Controlled Temporary Modifications or MDP-ZZ-FSOOl for freeze Seals.

Evaluate risk using APA-ZZ-00315,

. Appendix A.

Response

See Section 4 2 3 ofthe RM Process the FSAR change per

,APA-ZZ-OOlO8 and fDP-ZZ-00103 I for revising License Documents.

Note:

A NO response in the Response U NO YES column at left means that the FSAR/TS Bases change is one that I

N/A requires further 50.59 review (i.e., is I

not excludable from further review).

A YES response means that the FSAR does NOT require further 50.59 review.

Process the TS Bases change per APA-ZZ-0O 10$ and fDP-ZZ-00 103 for revising License Documents.

Note:

A NO response in the Response column at left means that the TS El NO El YES Bases change is one that requires further 50.59 review (i.e., is not N/A excludable from further review).

A YES response means that the TS

. Bases Change does NOT require further 50.59 review.

VI.

Does the proposed activity involve a cliange to:

I.

Managerial or administrative procedures, controls, or activities (including software used only for the implementation of administrative procedures, controls, or activities) governing the conduct of facility operations (suhiLet to the control of lOt I l{t) Appndi B) 2.

Regulatory commitment not covered by another regulation NO based change process? (See NEI 99-04)

APA-ZZ-OO I 43 A170.OO1O 2.

A temporary alteration (to procedures or the facility) supporting maintenance (TASM) that will be in effect during at-power operations for 90 days or less?

V.

Does the 1)ropose.d activity involve a changc to the:

I.

FSAR NO DYES Ifthe above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.

Ifthe above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve an FSAR change that may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NEI 9607 or NEI 9803? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right.)

Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria ofRM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided if the FSAR change requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II ofthis Applicability Determination form.)

2.

Technical Specification Bases?

NO El YES If the above response is NO, check N/A in the Response column at right.

If the above response is YES, does the proposed activity involve a TS Bases change comparable to that which may be excluded from the requirement to perform a 50.59 Screen/Evaluation by NET 9607 or NEI 9803 (as described for an FSAR change)? (Provide a YES or NO response to this question in the Response column at right.)

Note: In lieu ofthe exclusion criteria of RM Section 4.2.3, a YES response may also be provided ifthe TS Bases change requires no further 50.59 review based on a YES response to the question in Section II of this Applicability Determination form.)

Response

See Section 4.2.4 1 4.2.6 ofthe RM.

rc9 NO YES IfYES, process per APA-ZZ-00 101 or APA-ZZ-00 109.

El YES If YES, process per LJ APA-ZZ-00540.

Page 3 CA2510 Rev. 005

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)

VII Does the proposed activity potentially affect the design,

. operation, or maintenance ofthe ISFSI facility as described in the dry cask storage FSAR or the 72.212 Report? (See FDP ZZ-00105 and Attachment 1 ofAPA-ZZ-00143.)

nIfYES, perform a 72.4$ Screen per APA-ZZ-00143 unless the change is completely covered by the response to Section II.

Note:

Editorial or administrative changes are excluded from the requirement to perform a 72.48 Review.

APA-ZZ-OO 143 A170.OO1O NO DYES Page 4 CA2510 Rev. 005

APPLICABILITY DETERMINATION (Continued)

VIII. Justification/explanation for Response(s) (as needed):

Ix.

Conclusion:

All aspects ofthe activity controlled by one or more ofthe procedures above, therefore a 50i9 Screen jjçt required.

n A portion ofthe activity isnot controlled by one or more fthe procedures above, therefore a 50.59 Screen is required.

x. Signoffs:

Qualified Preparer:

Qualified Reviewer:

iL$(v(D i/?4ttl Date:

Date:

t I 24/ z(

Ensure that once signed, this record is loaded into EB with the Activity/Document Number listed above or submit this form to either the Regulatory Affairs clerk or another member of Administration in accordance with APA-ZZ-00220.

Revision ofthe RERP Implementing procedure is covered solely by IOCFR 5O.54(qj and controlled by KDP-ZZ-00400.

Therefore, 10CFR5O.59 is not required.

APA-ZZ-OO 143 Page 5 CA2510 A170.OO1O Rev. 005

50.54(q) Screening form Document # Rev #. &

Title:

EiPZZ-AOOO I. Rev024, iie;iy Rsponse Orginthiikm EP Tracking #:

2024001 Activity Description and

References:

All: Reformatted procedure to align with Callaway Standards II Pg. 5-Step 3.71.e Modified verbiage of the step for clarity on expectations. CR 202308778

e. Ensure duty exchange and turnover is completed verbally or through a text.

1 Acknowledgement by oncoming position is required. Email is not an actable method.

2.Turnover items are consideration include:

T$C/EOF Issues impacting functionality.

180sf Major work schedule for the week EITER equipment issues Weather, Security, and Road impediments Reminder to check QualMaster.

Pg. & 3.8 Note Created new notes using 2 bullets removed from step 3.8.3 Pg 6 Step 3.8.3 Removed bullets and made them into 3.8 note Activity Scope:

YES NO D(s this& 1\\ fl rL\\ ise tik R sht I I rn..

n n

PlanRIRP ) or I znj ILmenhln Proct duiec Xi Change Type:

YES NO Is this ctn its Lditorial or tp.t )h1t il L

Xi Previousl:v Approved Change:

YES NO Is this activity being processed to conform to a previously approved activity?

.. iJ 1fYES, what is the prcviously appn.cd activity?

Planning Standard DeterminatIon:

I)oes this activity impact any of the 50.47(b) Planning Standards or Part 50 Appendix F:

YES NO 50.47(b)( I )

- Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control)?....

Li 1

5t),47(b)(2)

- Onsite Emergency Organization?

.. U 5t),47(hX3)

Eniergency Response Support and Resources?

L IXi 50.47(b)(4)

Emergency Classification System?

LI Xi 5t).47(b)(5)

Notification Methods and Procedures?

Li 50.47(b)(6)

- Emergency Communications?

.,.. LI 5047(b)(7)

- Public Education and Information?

... U 50.47(b)(8)

- Emergency facility and Equipment?

.. Li 50.47(b)(9)

- ACCIdCHt Assessment?

.... J 5t).47(b)(1t))-ProtectiveResponse?

LI 50.47(h)( I I )

- Radiological Exposure Control?

Li 50.47(b)(12) - Medical and Public Health Support?

Li 5t).47(b)(13) - Recovery Planning and Post Accident Operations?

LI 50.4?(b)(14)

Drills and Exercises?

[j 50 47(b)(15)

Emergency Responder framing ?

=1 50.47(b)(l6)

- Emergency Plan Maintenance U

LXI Part 50 Appendix E?

. Li Commitment Impact Determination:

YES NO Does this activity impact a Site Specific EP Commitment not associated with a Planning Standard or Element?

U If Yes. record the Commitment number:

File # A21t).003%

Page 1 of2 CA1523 T7TD 77 (nAfln Rev. 002

50.54(q) Screening Form Screening Evaluatioii Results:

Based cu the results 01 the information abo c. can the LICtI\\ UX be inipiernented WItIH)u1 irktuia a YES NO

1u11 Su 4(o) I fkdixtns I flu ition R

L Review/Approval:

Preparer (Sign/PIN):

//:/c):,

i)ie: Q f

/

Rexiewr(SignPlN):

/

7 767G Emeiency Preparedness NIa&iucr {Sin PINj: P LV 3

&:: 4-t t3 11141/24 File # A2l0.0038 K DP-77-00400 Page 2 of 2 CA1523 Rev. 002 Explanation of Determination: E?1te; an crqianation to each detennination-answer that needs c/a4fication)

The changes made are associated with Planning Standard 10CFR 50A7(b)(l), Assignment of Responsibility (Organization Control) but are only administrative updates and inclusion of some best practices. These changes do not impact any of the associated Planning Standard requirements. Therefore, a I OCFR 5O54(q) evaluation is not required.

Date:

a92Q%/

ZotV l)ie: