|
|---|
Category:Legal-Correspondence
MONTHYEARML23256A3642023-09-0606 September 2023
28J Letter Re ISP September 6, 2023
ML23256A3662023-09-0101 September 2023
Fasken Standing and Statutory Addendum
ML23234A0792023-08-21021 August 2023
8-21-23 Order (5th Cir.)(Case 23-60377)
ML23234A0782023-08-18018 August 2023
8-18-23 Certified Index of Record (5th Cir.)(Case 23-60377)
ML23202A1212023-07-14014 July 2023
7-14-23 Fasken Certificate of Parties, Rulings, and Related Cases (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML23199A0312023-07-14014 July 2023
7-14-23 Amended Certificate as to Parties, Rulings, and Related Cases (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML23199A0322023-07-14014 July 2023
7-14-13 Amended Docketing Statement (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML23199A0342023-07-14014 July 2023
7-14-23 Certificate of Service (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML23202A1262023-07-14014 July 2023
7-14-23 Fasken Docketing Statement (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML23202A1322023-07-14014 July 2023
7-14-23 Fasken Statement of Underlying Decisions from Which Petition Arises (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML23202A1442023-07-14014 July 2023
7-14-23 Fasken Certificate of Service for Preliminary Filings (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML23195A0042023-07-11011 July 2023
7-11-23 Petition for Review (5th Cir.)(Case No. 23-60377)
ML23110A0282023-04-13013 April 2023
4-13-23 Status Report Beyond Nuclear V NRC (Case No. 20-1187)
ML23018A1802023-01-13013 January 2023
1-13-23 Status Report (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML22084A0292022-03-24024 March 2022
3-24-22 City of Fort Worth Notice of Intent to Participate (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048)(Consolidated)
ML22081A2202022-03-19019 March 2022
3-19-22 Sierra Club-Don't Waste Michigan Statutory Addendum (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048)(Consolidated)
ML22081A2062022-03-18018 March 2022
3-18-22 Beyond Nuclear Opening Brief (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048)(Consolidated)
ML22081A2252022-03-18018 March 2022
3-18-22 Beyond Nuclear Statutory Addendum (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1048)(Consolidated)
ML21182A2132021-07-0101 July 2021
7-1-21 Entry of Appearance (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1147)
ML21181A0632021-06-29029 June 2021
Notice (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1147)
ML21181A0622021-06-25025 June 2021
6-25-21 Petition for Review (DC Cir.)(Case No. 21-1147)
ML20192A0282020-07-0909 July 2020
Beyond Nuclear Docketing Statement (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)(Consolidated with 20-1225)
ML20192A0512020-07-0909 July 2020
7-9-20 Underlying Decisions from Which Petition Arises (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187 (Consolidated with 20-1225))
ML20192A0542020-07-0909 July 2020
7-9-20 Certificate of Service (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)(Consolidated with 20-1225)
ML20189A0262020-07-0606 July 2020
7-6-20 Motion for Abeyance (DC Cir.) (Case No. 20-1187) (Consolidated with 20-1225)
ML20183A1252020-06-30030 June 2020
6-30-20 Motion to Intervene (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1225)(Consolidated with 20-1187)
ML20176A1922020-06-19019 June 2020
6-19-20 Petition for Review (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1225)
ML20162A1022020-06-0404 June 2020
Petition for Review (DC Cir.)(Case No. 20-1187)
ML19133A0872019-05-10010 May 2019
Letter from Andrew P. Averbach to Mark Langer Beyond Nuclear, Inc. V. NRC, (28j Letter)(Case No. 18-1340)(Filed) - 5/10/19
ML19094B4322019-04-0101 April 2019
Certified Index of the Record (DC Cir.)(Case No. 18-1340) - 4/1/19
2023-09-06
[Table view]Some use of "" in your query was not closed by a matching "". |
Text
Case: 23-60377 Document: 44 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/06/2023 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 September 6, 2022 BY ELECTRONIC FILING Lyle W. Cayce Clerk of Court United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 600 S. Maestri Place New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 Re: Fasken v. NRC, No. 23-60377
Dear Mr. Cayce:
Federal Respondents write to address the Courts recent decision in Texas v. NRC, No. 21-60743 (5th Cir. Aug. 25, 2023). The panels decision bears on multiple issues germane to this case, including one raised in our motion to dismiss on July 28, 2023. Specifically, Texas held that the petitioners (including the Petitioners here) had standing to contest the Nuclear Regulatory Commissions issuance of a spent fuel storage license; that the petitioners were not required to participate in the adjudicatory proceedings before the agency to be parties aggrieved under the Hobbs Act because they challenged the agencys statutory authority to issue the license; and that the Commission lacks authority to issue a license for the away-from-reactor storage of spent nuclear fuel.
Federal Respondents are considering whether to seek further review in Texas.
Because Petitioners opening brief in this case is due prior to the time that a rehearing petition would be filed, Federal Respondents are amenable to staying the briefing in this case until the mandate issues in Texas. However, we were unable to reach an agreement with Petitioners concerning the appropriateness or terms of such a stay.
Case: 23-60377 Document: 44 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/06/2023 L. Cayce Federal Respondents will continue to update the Court about developments in the Texas case. Meanwhile, Federal Respondents respectfully suggest that the pending motion to dismiss may either be (1) carried with the case to the merits panel; or (2) deferred until the mandate issues in Texas.
Respectfully,
/s/ Andrew P. Averbach Solicitor Counsel of Record for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission