ML23251A032

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
FOIA-2023-000163 - Responsive Record - Public ADAMS Document Report. Part 3 of 19
ML23251A032
Person / Time
Issue date: 08/31/2023
From:
NRC/OCIO
To:
- No Known Affiliation
Shared Package
ML23251A034 List:
References
FOIA-2023-000163
Download: ML23251A032 (1)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:. l NUCLEAR Rt0VLA10RY COMMistl0N ii w Ascotou, o. c. nm JUN 11 199$ Infantion in tw ricanvas dt!cted ) i SGPR:RBM in accordance witi he Frcedom of Information - 50 410 Act, cyptions m. ) FOIA _IO.ULf_- [ MEMORANDUM FOR: Cecil 0. Thomas. Chief Standardization and Special Projects Branch Division of Licensing, NRR t TROM: George W. McCorkle Chief i Power Reactor SG Licensing Branch Division of-Safeguards, NMSS

SUBJECT:

NIAGARA MOHAWK-POWER CORPORATION NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UN!T 2 r SAFETY CVALVATION REPORT-e h b Based on our review of the applicant's-sutdittel dated May 15, 1985. i we have prepared e revised pige to the SER statement for the Nine flile Point ~ Nuclear Station. A. proposed implementing license condition and listing of revisions are enclosed. This completes our review of :this application. sLr ~ s 197 muwrie. hTM osure36W wtto George . NcCorkle, Chief h icistra n crimiW mtiou. Poaer Reactor. SG Licensing Bran Division of-Safeguards, NMSs

Enclosures:

l 2, as stated cc: J. Joyner, RI. - - ~. j-H. Hau; hey, NRR 3 CONTACT:

    • * ""#a. Wie w eu,,

M gh//g-R. B' Manili, N'iSS "i-f# '42 4 4709 Daim m y c.,,,,,i,,y _ s l ( )' sr.2 a g21gi9012 PERSON 90-269 4/g,; , myd3w333_ _ , y.y y 3 3;q

3; 3 ;;
- ~3 ~ ;

4 s'- 4 .? r r + 50-410' ENCLOSURE 1 g PROPOSED LICENSE CONDITIO_N, s The licensee shall fully implement and maintain in effect all provisions bf the Commission-approved physical security, guard training and qualification, and safeguards contingency plans, including all amendments and revisions made pursuant to the authority of 10 CFR 50.90 and 10 CFR 50.54(p), which are part . ~.w..of the license. These plans, which con,tain Safeguards Information protected under 10 CFR 73.21, are entitled: "Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 Physical Security Plan," "Nine liile Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 Security ~ Training and Qualification Plan," and "Nine 1111e Point Unit 2 Safeguards Contingency Plan" (Chapter 8 of the Security P.lan). u W e SD' I e 6 ** \\ - 8 w e C e y a o

I ~ rm:anar.uaEachusmu anam m.wc.asamwansar-aswaasaruman.auwam EllCt.05URE 2 Docket: 50 410 May 21, 1985 NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION UNIT 2 The approved security plans for the Nine 1411e Point Nuclear Station Unit 2 consist of the following submittals. "Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Physical Security Plan _" - Submittal 1, undated (by letter dated January 26, 1983) as revised by: - Submittal 2, dated September 9,1983 (by letter dated September 12,1983) - Submittal 3, dated June 19,1984 (by letter dated June 19,1984) l - Submittal 4, dates sept aber 26,1984 (by letter dated Septaber 26,1984) Submittal 5. dated 11ay 15,1085 (by letter dated May IS,1985) "Nine liile Point Unit 2 Safeguards Contingency Plan" (Chapter 8 of the Security Pl a n)_ Submittal 1, undated (by letter dated !! arch 27,19f9) as revised by: Submittal 2, cated February 21,1980 (by letter dated February 25, 1980) Submittal 3, dated Itarch 4,198') (by letter dated Itarch 11,1980) "Nine Mile Point Unit 2 Security Training and Qualification Plan" Submittal 1, undated (by letter dated August 17, 1979) as revised by: Submittal 2, dated April 20, 1981 (by letter dated June 26, 1981) Submittal 3, undated, (by letter dated December 28,1981)

,r#C AM4M M fM, a,%.J'.ka'ad'Ae .'W 4 d4 wwseme cas e w w.a "P Nam' M--ww-T aw--.-ww--p-e 54 -+ + +

  • 6 e

] i i I i 1 i I i i I L i 1 6 Y l k 4 k i-l .1, i 6 j i l } I I ? e a i F J 1 c l 4 1 ? W bN>H< -l 4 WM-syy*- 'g'tNTw 4_h e 4w a-e-, q 9 yp. Pgue ti rer-=-Tgernw epypet-wp at1eL e dypw gtme+Mgg ypge - ege p6 Dhv DM'h TW $ DPh*'W-M*#*,Mg"4gry.%vwfu(y ag -ggggpgsat, y N *g.4 gr pg v + m.V4 W ww w w g=wel es s -d eO w/s$ wWM"fi'stP*9'd+'g' 'v+h,44*WgM'W'*

[ aem ' l b na wa asnnnn sA:t rm 2 ' c..I'ng FanNILMTzun JAN 151986 Docket No. 50 410 Licente No. CitR 112 Niagara Mohemk power Corporation ATTN: Mr. Joseph J. Sunser Maneger, System Security 300 Eric Boulevard, West Syracuse, hew York 13202 Gentieren:

Subject:

Inspection No. 50 410/85-38 This refers to the preoperational security program review ccnducted by Jack M. Dunlap of this of fice on October 28 - November 1,1985, at Nine Mile Point Unit 2, Scriba, New York, of activities authorized by NRC License No. CPPR-ll2 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Dunlap with Mr. Robert F. Orr and otMrs of your staff at the conclusion of the review. Areas examined during this review are descrited in the NRC Fegion 1 Inspection Report which is enclosed with this letter, Within these~ areas, the review con-sisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, intervitews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. Our review in-dicates that the developrent and implementation of your physical security program are progressing as scheduled. Attte4++-r+rogrehs-4t.-Aun hm a t1 - t 0- Ge-+M4Ms4 ir4fw-t4en-r4 par t_catain detrih-t4-you r S e c e'4ty-pre 9t9m-Wet-b6ve-t+ee-dettrmined-to-be-trempt--Cram $mbi k di sc%we-4e-eeeoNenee-w+th-Kt-tiR -0.5(eM44-(temett404-oH%ncial 4M+retMow). Therefore, these paragraphs will not be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room end will receive limited distribution. This letter and the retainder of the enclosure will be placed in the Public Docurent Room, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 (a), ho reply to this letter is required. Your cooperation with us is appreciated. Sincerely, N a " m m g.J r' + "%

e. iginal tirst El8-b xcms m r* t -

DIInIofm3U00

g., r, y. ; : e ' :

F01Ak4hb[c f* [g u Thorias T. Martin, Director Division.of Radiation Safety and Safegu'ards

Enclosure:

NRC Region 1 Inspection Report No. 50-410/85-38 (Mfw44on-Repert Su49r+ph-H-end-At t achment A, pe re9 jess 1, 2 r 4, C, S,13, and-M-eentMn 40merthi or-Tinene4WirJerm;ior, s00fl)). OFFICIAL RECORD COPY 1R NM2 8538 - 0001.0.0-11/27/85 100 ? A ) // _ W(')/ A I g fjp3p g9gg p}Nggjfg gf[gN ~ a# 4

4 .$iag6raMohawkPowerCorp. 2 cc w/ enc 1: (w/o COF1) Connor & Vet.terhahn John W. Keib, Esquire D. Quatime, NMP 2 Project Director C. Beckham, NMPC QA Manager T. J. Perkins, General Superintendent R. B. Abbott, Station $uperintendent Department of Public Service, State of New York Public Document Room (PDR) local Public Document Room (LPDR) Nuclear Safety Information Center (N$1C) NRC Resident inspector (w/C0FI) $ tate of New York bec w/enci: (w/o C0FI) Region i Docket Room (with concurrences) Management Assistant DRMA (w/o enc 1) DRP Section Chief J. Grant, DRP Region 1 SLO R. B. Man 111, NMSS (w/COFI) !l$:kI D^$:RI DP. R1 OR$ RI Du /ca Ke - ner M tin 1//(/86 1//e/86 1786 /86 0FFICIAL RECORD COPY IR NM2 85 0002.0.0 01/09/86 -.. __o

~ IdHT 3.790(d)-INF()HL14W U.$. NUCLEAR REGUI.ATORY C0v315$10N REG 10N 1 \\, I Repcrt No. 50-410/S!-38 Docket No. 50 410 License No. CPPR-112 I licensee: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation i( .300 Erie _Soulevar_d West _ Syracuse. New York 13202 i Facility Na-e: Nine Mile Point, Unit 2 Inspection At: $criba Ne._Yort j n Inspection Cer.cacted: Octoper 26 - November I J S5 Date of i.ast FFysical Security lnspe: tion: May 21 24,1954 t Type of Inscection: Preoperational_ Security Procram Review (( gy [_ / - /d -[jf_ . a kg 1 Inspector: n.,niap, e nysic ifecurity I_r ste: tor date p.,/p. i f7 _/. 44. E i Approved by: ,-{ ,.iard n. Let ig, Ct date Safeguards..ction s55 1rtspection Syreary: Review of PhysMal _$ecurity flan and im ementing Pro.- r Ij cedures for kecept of_Sy'ciaT Nuclear Material _of" Low Stra ic Sig~nificance t-and frl-operationaI~$ecuritTfrocramREiewon~ W've r 6 - ovemberl[T$l6~, (T ipl W I 6.~ 5(ITAT6'il F 3S) i i i Areas Reviewed: Security plan.and implementing procedures for receipt ofl ~ speciai nuclear material of low strategic significance; Pre-operational review of the t.ecurity program developeent and implemer.tation;-Follow-up on previously identified Inspector Follo -up-Itemst Licensee consideration and actions on previously, issued Inspection and Enforcement Bulletins, Circulars and Notices;' - and, independent inspection Ef fort,.The review involved 32 hours onsite during regular hours by one NRC region-based inspector. 'j Results: The licensee was found capable of implementing the security plan for l l receipt of fuel which was approved by NRC on September 18, 1985. Development -j and implementation of the plant's physical security-program is progressing ~ satisfactorily in accordance with the licensee's schedule. ~ l4 p)009 ~ i ()[Jd(')- - umnoun mennu ,j..owg & ' iu c.nu(u; numuu z QQ

4 DETAILS 1. Persons Contacted R. F. Orr, Supervisor, Nuclear Security J. P. Beratta Assistant Supervisor, Nuclear Security H. G. Christiansen, Supervisor, Nuclear Security Clearances D. K. MacVittie, Nuclear Security Specialist J. T. Christmas, Nuclear Security Sergeant-D. A. Rath, Security Investigator D. R. Keeney, Assistant Nuclear $ecurity Specialist J. Dilk Training Isstructor, Nuclear Security-The inspector also interviewed other licensee personnel, including nereers of the guarc f crce. 2. M: 3070? Exit Interview ine inspect r met w*th the licenlee representatives listed le paragraph I at the conclusion of the review on November 1 1985, discussed the purpose and scope, and presented the findings. Written material was rot provided to the licensee by the ins;ector at anytime during this re.'iew. 3. M: 0;J01 - Status o'_:nsoe: tor Follow-up Items Tne following Inspe: toe Follow up Iter., (IFI's), identified curing the initial preoperatiora'. Se:crity program review (NRC Region 1 Inspection ~ Report 50-410/84-10), ere reviewed during this inspection: IFl 84-10-01, -02, -03. -06, -07, -10, -11, -14, -17 -22, and -25. Licensee-actions regarding IFl 84-10-22 was found acceptable and this item was closed, The-status of the remaining IFl's is as discussed in _the applicatie paragraphs of this report. l 4. M _81018 - Security Plan and imclementing_rrocedures The inspector reviewed the Nine Mile Point Nuclear _ Station, Unit 2 Secur-ity' Plan for.Special Naclear Material (SNM) of low Strategic Significance, dated May 29, 1984, and Revision-1 dated August 8, 1985, anc-Niagara Mo-hawk Power Corporation (NMpCy Security Directive-34, dated October.23, 1935, entitled Receipt of New Fuel Assemblies. The Plan was approved by l. NRC letter-dated September 18.-1985. NMPC Security Directive-34 coniisted of the following procedures: a. Fuel Receipt b. Access Control Fuel Receipt' Area (CAA-1)_

3 c. Access Control Fuel Receipt Area (CAA-2) d. Civil Disturbance e. Strike or Work Action f. Internal Disturbance 9 l.ess of On-Site power /L4ghting h. Fire, Explosion, or other Catastrophe i, Breach of CAA j. Theft of_$NM k. Threat to Steal SNV. of LS$ The pro:edores were adequate and storopriate to implement the NRC approwed pbn and the requirements of 10 C4 73.67, inspector Fo11cw-up Item S4-10-01 -emains open pending review of the site physicJ se:vrity plan and imr'e etting procedures. MC B1022_ Sucvdty_Organizati:n (vanagement) 5. e The lice,1ce has not yet identifie: all of the additional _ supervisory personnel to manage the expanced ; :prietary guard force wNn implemen - tation of tre Unit 2 program is re:. ired. One captain has been appointed and additi:ral oesitions for four 'teutenants and three sergeants have beer, appr:s ed. The licensee arti:':ates that_these oositions will be filled n N:ebe" 1985, insitet0' Follow up Item 84-10-02 remains open per cing finalization of. staft; and subsequent NRC review. 6. MC 61026 - 5ecurity Orean_i:attor; (:ersonnelj The li ensee stated that apprcxirately 70 additional security personnel will be e:tuired to staf f the cor:'ted Unit I and Unit 2 security force. Approximataly three-fourths of this _ number have been fully qualified and the remai ger were scheduled to be;'n-training on November 4, 1985. By mid-Decemce 1985, the licensee es;ects to have all the new guards fully trained and cualified. Inspector Fs11cwup Item 84-10-03 remains open pending completion of training ard subsequent NRC ~ review. 7. MC 81' 38 - Records and Reyorts The licensee stated that all recc*:s and reports are expected to be modi-fied to include the addition of Unit 2 security facilities and equipment by the end of December, 1985. Irs;ector Follow up Item 84-10-06 remains open pending completion of modifications:and subsequent NRC review. 8. MC 8'342 - Testing and_ Mainterante The licensee stated that the security equipment at Unit 2, with a few ex - i ceptions (e.g. high mast lighting), is compatable'with the equipment cur-rently in use at Unit 1. Therefore, maintenance procedures will require only minor changes and should be cc pleted by the end of December 1985. Administrative procedures are sufficiently encompassing.to be applied-without revision. Inspector Folle. up Item 84-10-07 remains open pending revision of neces$ary procedures atd subsequent NRC review,

. - - -. - - - -.. - -. ~ ~ - - - ,gT 0 ennm 1MLMint A meno- _j i s w.v e vgu y u n v awm i Um i l 4 9. MC 81052 - rhysical Barriert_(P,r_otected Area) The physical barrier $strounding the protected area (PA) was examined by the inspector. The licensee stated that a prelimtnary survey of water i drains and tunnels was begun but could not be completed until construction was finished. inspector Followup Item 64 10 10 remains open pending com-pletion of the PA barrier and subsequent NRC review.-

10. MC 81154. P_hysical_ Barriers (Vital Areas)f l

The inspector observed that the construction of vital areas-was:progres-sing as scheduled, however, there were nur.erous pipe and cable openings in thL walls, floors and ceilings of these areas =that require additional.

work, inspection follow up Item 84 10 11 renains open pending completion -

of necessary work in all vital areas and subsequent NRC review.-

11. MC 81066 Assessment Aids l

ff The inspector observed that the was inste e u not, connecte no e; alarm stations, t i test equipment, the inspector was able.to view each' Theinspectordetermine(dthat)~ additional-'ad M area of coveraoe. are necessary. (4 W4 $61. ,)ustment to the Inspector Follow up Item 84 10-14Lremains open.

12. MC 81074 Access Cont _rol_ (Vehiclejj, The inspector determined that the-licensee reviewed NRC-IE Information Notice No. 64-07. Design Basis Threat and Review of Vehicular Access.

Controls, dated February 3, 1984, and had considered the information-Inspector,c llow;up item Notice.(SeealsoAttachmentA. Paragraph 16.) o i 84 10 17 renains open pending subsequent NRC review of procedures for vehicle access control. ~

13.,NC 81501 - Training and Qualification Plan-l-

-The inspector: reviewed the status of guard force training-and-qualificae tions. Although the. existing training staf f is-suf ficient to-train lthe-- additional-personnel needed for the combined Nine Mile PointtUnit liand Unit 2 security force, the licensee stated that an additional l training instructor has been hired.and will complete the training and: qualification program in. December 1985. - By mid December 1985,= the combined Nine Mile [ Point security force will:be at its desired strength level. accordingLto-i the licensee, b As a result of Ift 84 10 22 which involved training in bomb search - techniques, the licensee advised the inspector that all-members of the [ construction guard force were trained in bomb search techniques. Subse-1- quently, these guard force members have.been converted to; temporary f p:.A.IPP 4 innt n..,nu i mrUHMA'llOM -m r m.,m m, --.~ - - -w,-%.- m-~.# - wm--

i .s watchmen. A review by the inspector of about 601 of the training and qualification records of the temporary watchmen disclosed that t1) we'e r full trained and qualified, except for firearns traini comp 5etion of training in bos6 search techniques, Inspeb.. Based upon is closed. r_ Fo11ow up_ lten - 84 10 22

14. MC 92703 - Follow up on NRC Inspection __4_nd Enforcement $v11etinta Circulars and_ Notices Attachment A contains infonnation concerning the licensee's consideration of previously issued NRC security related bulletins,by the NRC's Office of, circulars and infor.

motion notices. These notifications were fonverded Inspection and Enforcement to all NRC nuclear power reactor licensees for l their infonnation and/or action. With the exception of if Information-Notices 84-08. 84 69, and 85 28, the inspector found that-the licensee had - considered those documents in developing the Unit 2 security program as-- described in Attachment A. Inspector Follow-up Item 84-10 26 temains open pending NRC review of the-licensee's actions regarding the. remaining 1E Notices.

15. MC 92706 - Independent inspect 1on Effort' On October 18,1985, Switch Gear Cabinet No.16 exploded, injurying three-craftworkers, one seriously.

The licensee's Supervisor, Nuclear Securit Clearances, informed the= inspector-that he had observed electricians in y spect the equipment right_ af ter the explosion-and-that the cause of the explosion appeared to have been an t'aectrical fault. A security guard was'~ posted at the equipment until the manufacturer's representatives arrived i on the scene to inspect the equipment. The inspector also interviewed the-Superintendent of Maintenance, who confinned 'the suspicion that the ex-plosion was caused by an electrical f ault. l< s k

~~~ i [l Mr, 2m ci ann / as nummnas i mmy i a n n a 4.. U V(tlJ I41I'.V IU H a TI"d o - j l ih j !' l' ATTACHMENT A 4 L Previously issued Licensee Action Relative to Pertinent t 7TT6Detins, Circulars and inTormation kotices J;' 1. IE CIRCULAR NO. 77 04: INADEQUATE LOCK ASSEMBLIES, DATED MARCH 18, 1977 lj NMPC Action: 28 The Circular was reviewed by the licensee. The following actions were i taken* (GOH-) Vital area doors at Unit 2.are secured wit a. ll f i, m i b. MGM-) Outswinging door $ and inswinging double doors ~ are equipped d. M0ft) All vital area doors, lod sets, and associated hardware are period. I ically inspected and tested to ensure that they are effective and j i have not been degraded through use. '(CCT ! ' 1 r I. IE BULLETIN NO. 77 08: ASSURANCE OF SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS DURING AN i 1 DiTRiDiCYTOITGWG SYSTEMS, DATETITCITHER 28, m7- { y i NMPC Action - 1 40F+) Security.relateddoors-atUnit2arenormallylockedand } a. equipped with key card readers. = In= the event of a com uter-failure ,j i l1 or an electrical problem, all doors may be ' opened by l1 ~M iGOF4-). b', -(LOFii Operations personnel, with emerce.cy plan duties" or who require immediate: access to-lant areas out of' operational necessity, are 1 issued and carry while on duty.which permit such access. + m 4. f s p - i ~ f r a n n &.i w - ' O U ' i n a nm o ShnlJ\\ IW i m i 4 f -t M _ )

l O iI)T 9 "'OM,li INI?AllM, A T s 4 mur .e<vyr uuvnn i Attachment A 2 4 3. IE CIRCULAR h05, 78-17 AND 79-03: INADE00 ATE GUARD TRAINING / QUALIFICATION XNb7ABYITFTEATNETE0VI)T DATEDTOBTFD7197FAWTUNAWIT, T979 h hMPC Action: f The Circular was reviewed by the licensee when issued,-and was considered in the preparation of the Unit 11 raining and Qualification Plan, which has since been reviewed and approved by hRR. Unit 2 security-personnel will becone part of the existing organization and the approved Training i and Qualification Plan will continue to be used. Personnel and training records, certifications, and supporting documentation are reviewed by mem. bers of security roanagement charged with the responsibility of conducting intra-departmental audits. Guard performance is continually evaluated to ensure that training is adequate end that-procedures are being properly ~ implemented. Weaknesses are corrected by spot retraining of individuals or by increasing the training in deficient areas. Classroom and range training is observed by security management personnel. All training is conducted by security training instructors wno are Niagara Mohawk-super-visory-personnel. 4 IE CIRCULAR h0. 79-08: ATTEMPTED EXTORTION LOW ENRICHED URANIUM, DATED F.{AY~WTT979 ~ hMPC Action _: The Circular was reviewed and considered in the preparation of the Secur-ity Plans for Units 1 and 2 to preclude a similar occurence at Nine Mile Point. Special nuclear material (SNM), on site, is not readily accessible for the following reasons: a. ) All vehicles are searched and escorted, if they are-iD0f4-) b. '(tOF+b SNM is in the fo fuel assemblies which are too large to be moved by M c. ~tt94-) Available SNM is stored within a Vital Area which must be ,' M d. '(teft} Photo-ID badges are not taken off site and are only issued to indivicuals af ter confirming their identity, prior to entry into the p1 ant. TCUTT) e. (f0H-) A continual audit and review of procedures and their-imple-mentation are conducted by the licensee and any perceived or actual weaknesses are corrected. M m,...e. _r uw MNE0RMATION ~

MrglT90(WINFORMNid 3 Attachment x S. IE BULLETIN NO. 79-16: VITAL AREA ACCESS CONTROLS, DATE0 JULY 30, 1979 NMPC Action: The Bulletin was reviewed for its applicability to Unit 2, as previously described for Unit 1 in the licensee's letter to NRC dated September 13, 1979. All cormitments will apply to Unit 2. Details of the vital area access control are found in the licensee's submitted Security and Safeguards Contingency Plan, which was written using the guidance found in NUREG-0908, Acceptance Criteria for the Evaluation of huclear Power Reactor Security Plans. 6. IE CIRCULAR NO. 80-09: PROBLEMS WITH PLANT INTERNAL COMMUNICATIONS- ~ ~ )Ts11PS3TGWGF2% l91f0 { NMPC Action: The Circular was revieweo by the Nine Mile Point see seit or en-WutT) ization. Security communication systems are supplied withf W thus ensuring continued operation in.the event of a loss of pri-mary power, as stated in the Security and Safeguards Contingency Plan which was submitted to NRC.~ Wufit l RFI problems ar.d concerns are addressed under IE Notice 83 83.. (See paragraph 15, below.) 7. lE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 80-18: POSSIBLE WEAPONS SMUGGLING POUCH, DATED MAY 5,_19TD 4 NMPC Action: The Notice was reviewed by Nuclear Security Management and is disseminated to members of the nuclear security organization, who are responsible for using the x-ray machine and for conducting package searches, in their 3 i training program, o 8. IE NOTICE NO. 82-05: INCREASING FREQUENCY OF DRUG-PELATED INCIDENTSg UATRITORH 10,1932 4 NMPC Action: The Notice was reviewed for applicability to Nine Mile Point Nuclear f Station Units 1 and 2. -The licensee-has an established drug and alcohol abuse policy which-includes an employee assistance program and first line-supervisory input through a continual observation / awareness program. - All security personnel involved in access control have received training in drug abuse and awareness and.have been effective in detecting end denying access to individuals who are under the influence of drugs or alcohol.: j i, . E IFI 4'790(#1NF0ltM#fION~ f ,..,e y

_NM h a 4 .@CAlt In addition, pre-employment screening of company employees for drug use, tnd spot testing of nuclear employee $ have been effective in assuring that employees are fit for duty. $C14) 9. IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 82-07: INADEQUATE SECURITY SCREENING PRM RAM $s ~~ '~ DAI'EFMAlifflOl[ i liMPC Action: This notice was reviewed for applicability to Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Units I and 2. Clearance requirementt, as contained in the ap-proved Security and Safeguards Contingency Plan, are specified in the boilerplate contained in all bid specifications, thus ensuring that Coh-tractors and subcontractors are made aware of the requirement that their employaes must be screened prior to being granted unescorted access to the protected and vital areas of the stations. All clearances are evaluated and granted by NMPC security personnel. In the event that a contractor's clearance program is accepted _in lieu of the licensee's,.the contractor's program is audited by NMPC security personnel to ensure a: curacy and completeness. (See also paragraph 11, below.) 10. IE INFORMATICN NOTICE No. 82-46: DEFECTIVE AND 0850LETE_COMBINAT101 FABCDCis7bifEDlDiCREEGO9T2 C i NMPC Action: The Notice was reviewed by the licensee. All $ argent and Greenleaf pad-locks used to secure Safeguards information at Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 are Model 8077-A. All $uch locks have been checked by the li;ensee to confirm. hat they do not have 1981 backplates, t 11. IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 83-15: FALSIFIED FRE-EMPLOYMENT $CREENING ~ RCD % ] ale.Dl Alf f2 f ilB f l ~~ fiMPC Actioy The Notice was reviewed by the licensee. Only a limited nusber of con-tractor clearance programs are accepted at Ni_ne Mile Point. These pro-grams are periodically audited by hMPC personnel to ensure accuracy and completeness of program. All other clearances are granted ~by NMPC after the criteria established in the approved Security and Safeguards Contin-gency Plan have been satisfied. 12. IE INF0kMAT10N NOTICE NO. 83-27: OPERATIONAL RESPONSE TO EVENTS COWCIEN%e~6CDFEIA~ft~1tWDTWBTirD'A3T!W5TPTJ9t 24IITRtitTDIT1D RAY 4, 1953 NMPC Action: This Notice was reviewed by the licensee. Security _ procedures, to cope + ART 2,790(friNF0ItM#NOF 7

yMm'4790(ilTTNFMlWMN 4 S I with radiological sabotage c.nd other threats to safety, were developed'in accordance with 10 CFR 73.$$(h)(1) and Appendix C of Part 73, The licen-see believes, based on response to past incidents, that established oper-ativnal and security procedures are adequate to ensure'the evaluation of any deliberate act directed against plant equipment and the implementation of proper actions to mitigate the safety consequences. 13, IE INF0AMAT10N NOTICE NO. 83-36: IMPACT OF $ECURITY PRACTICES ON SAFE ~ D>lRMION$ZDA11CQUWE~9719~sf NMpC Action: The Notice was reviewed by the licensee anc the concerns were addressed in the Security and Safeguards Contingency Plan for Unit 2 which was sub-mitted to NRC. Specifically, the following measures have been taken t. address the concerns. -(+A) Assurance of prompt operator access to o;erating spaces and a. equipment is achieved y providing to on-duty operations n security doors which lock personnel. These may be useo t v in the closed position in the event of loss f electrical power or access control computer failure, are issued and carried by or duty operations pers:,nnel an:: are turned in to ecurity prior te exiting the protected area, Addittoralf~ are issued to the Station Shift Supervisor in tht event other individuals, who are authori:ed, require access.~twP) b. (C7U [t ,2'~< ,are not a part of the security system at Nint Mile roint, Keypad card readers,.hoiever, are used at all [ vnoce.upied vital areas and at some vital ares entrances, These de-vices require that in the event-of an emergency, however, the carried by all operations personnel will override any security hardware and permit unimpeded access, (COF!) Although the Security and Safeguard Contingency Plan, Emergency c. Response plan and Emergency Operating Procedures have been de-veloped it. dependently, they are generally consistent in their re- ) sponse matrix, inconsistencies which were identified during the drills at the Unit I were resolved, d. Annual audits of the security program are conducted by the Safety Review and Audit Board (SRAB) using experienced QA auditors and j security consultants. These audits are performed under the cogni-zance of the plant Safety Operations Review Committee (50RC). In addition, any changes to security hardware or computer software are treated as modifications and require a safety analysis and review by 50RC and SRAB. L ggg.s90RyiNFOM T10K

a' m YtNF0t., i ram nui - x 6 i e. General Employee Training, which is attended annually by all station personnel who have unescorted access to the station, provides in-doctrination into the roles and responsibilities of all disciplines and organizations. ll 14. IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 83-68: RESPIRATOR USER WARNING: ~ DEFECTIVE [EJF C651AlWC0 BTitAtiifMG AMIU~tUFATR CYLrsb[MTDATFoCfDBtrlTf1983 l NMPC Action; The licensee determined that this Notice was not applicabie to the secur-ity organization. Members of the Nuclear Security Organization do not

l utilize self contained respiratory equipment; only negative pressure devices are used by security personnel.

.i ( 15. IE INFORMAi10N NOTICE NO. 83-83: USr OF PCRIABLE RADIO TRANS4]TTERS IhTl dClf0 Cit ~AGOVE WAls[DAR D 0!(E Est f f5Z19@~~~ ~ qv,PC _ At tion: -(G44 Tne licensee reviewed this Notice and initiated actions to address the problem of radio frequency interference (RFI) generated oy portable radio transmitters. Plans are being ceveloped to increase the density of i the radiax network and-to decrease its power level. -In addition, the power output of portable racios will be W Tests have incicated that these nocifications will not cegrade the reliability of comunications within the station, if f uture testing shows { j that certain pieces of equiptrent are more susceptible to Rf! than others, such equipment will be identified and the use of portable radios.in close proximity to it will be administratively controlled. A memorandum was issued by on November 16, 1984 directing that two wa adios not be used 1 I 16. IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 84-07:~ DESIGN BASIS THREAT AND REVIEW OF- ~~ V(EllUilIi'KCClT$~CDKTYdEG~0li10 fikklIAWCMET NMPC Action: ) cability to Unit 2. iCOT!) The Information Notice was reviewed for a The licensee believes that the on the vehicle approach, and the use of ou d prec ude vehicle ~ penetration. (64-) f 17. IE INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 85-04: INADEDUATE MANAGEMENT OF SECURITY L lis'5FORSE~DHLS, 6Kil0l_ JANUARY !?,1985 NMPC Action: t The Notice.was reviewed by the licensee's security training personnel. All participants in crills conducted at Nine Mile Point are assigned to b PAR 1L9 70MM WEORM#P10Ti - i

e..-- . t ~t ) 3 I 7 1 training. briefed end examined prior to the coriduct of.any exercise, i Additionally, on-duty security personnel are made aware of the drill, and j prior coordination with station operations personnel is carried out, J 4 I l I i i I e F h t 6 e ? ? 't i ) ) 'l ? f

v 3 %_ u..& .m j i p ~.. o .-- - i r ,t v. f. j_; g, y^'m.i y... - y 14 y, + ._m r ---TEMtg Docket Nos. 50-220 t.icense No's. DPR-63 $0-410 NPF-69 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ATTN: Mr. Joseph P. Beratta inicm:!!c,3 J3 ff>IS record W dekled Manager, System Security la te;ord;nce gjhgi reedo:D of Informa 300 Erle Bouleyard Vest f /.ct, e 4 3~ Syracuse, New York 13202 FolA. Gentlemen-subject: Cembined Inspection No. 50-220/87-14 and 50-410/87-30 This refers to the routine physical security inspection conducted by Mr. W. G. Partin, of this of fice on July 27-31. 1987, at Scriba, New York, of activities authorized by NRC License Nos. OPR-63 and NPf-69 and to the discussions of our findings held by Mr. Martin with Mr. D. D.10'Hara and other n.exbers of your staf f at the conclusion of the inspecticn. Areas examined during this inspection are described in the NRC Region ! Inspection Report which is enclosed with this letter. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and observations by the inspector. Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that one of your activities was not conducted in f ull compliance viith NRC requirements as set fc,rth in Paragraph 5 of the enclosed inspection report. This violation was identified by Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation per$0nnel and adequately corrected prior in the completion of the inspection; therefore, no response is required. Paragraph 5 in the enclosed inspection report contains details of your security program that have been determined to be exempt f rom public distic%ce in accordance with 10 CFR 73.21 (Saf eguards Information). Therefore, the paragraph will not be placed in the NRC's Public Document Room and will receive limited distribution. This letter and the remaining portions of the inspection report will be placed in the Public Document Room, in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790(a). , _ '. m. m ;.,. ; - .,a-a ,p. v e o.7 ... i [p.'fA.N. , _.f".* k j; rw .n j - E... Ct L ~ y.n/.r. ; yrt'.153 [a .7,7. E i [3 0FFICI Al. RECORD COPY CIR SG NMP 87-14/30 - 0001.0.0 l o.. ~. i.1 01/05/88 1 $$,k l wn -y~

Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation 2 fEB 0 5 IW I Your cooperation with us is appreciated. sincerely, cric tr.n Signed By: nchned E. Ketels Thomas T. Martin, Director Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards

Enclosure:

Combined Inspection Nos. 50 220/87-14 and 50-410/87-30 (Paragraph 5 contains Safeguards Information (SGI)) cc w/ enc 1 (w/o SGI): T. E. Lempges, Vice President, Nuclear Generation C. Beckham, Manager Nuclear Quality Assurance Operations T. Perkins, General Superintendent, Nuclear Generation W. Hansen, Manager Corporate Quality Assurance T. Roman, Unit 1 Station Superintendent J. Aldrich, Unit 1 Superintendent, Operations W. Drews, Technical Superintendent J. A. Perry, Vice President, Quality Assurance D. Quame, NMP-2 Project Director R. B. Abbott, Station Superintendent Troy B. Conner, J.. Esquire John W. Keib, Esquire Director, Dower Division Public Document Room (POR) local Public Document Room (LPOR) Nuclear Safety Information Center (NS!C) NRC Resident inspector (w/SGI) State of New York bec w/enci (w/o SGI): Region 1 Docket Room (with concurrences) NRC Project inspector Management Assistant, ORMA (w/o encis) Section Chief, ORP Robert J. Bores, OR55 RI:0RSS RI: SS c:.r : a WMartin/geb Kr mig 6 W /k 8 1/,t/ /88 ld/88 / OFFICIAL RECORD COPY CIR SG NMP 87 '.4/30 - 0002.0.0 01/05/88 k

1 % A,. w.S,7(4 d,5(.//;cg/ r. vc 3. ~. v.:i N#.Y I m i) sicur.r.$f Cf m. md . V ? > w.J.! .s 7'.a.\\ s% rN05..

  • ?.*h*.l__ ' _

.2 - f,q- ~

  • L

\\--~~-- ? ~ < ~n Icas...::u :: x:) gg) ~- = U.S. NUCLEAR REGULA10RY CCM15510N REGION 1 50-220/87-14 Report Nos. 50 410/87-30

  • ye. {5,,

....,,,.. rg , v.,1,t, (6.%',3,t..*:! '.,

k. :y;llis b;d/a) 50-220 t.vmp A k.e 0 Docket Nos.

50 410 . -........'i DPR-63 License Nos. NPP-09 Licensee: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Qidi 300 Gli~ Boulevard,13t02 fyrjicii~el nit Yid Pac 11ity Name: N i n e Mi l,e Po_i,n t un i t s,1. a nd 2 u Inspection At: Scriba_, New York Inspection Conducted: July _27;)), 1957 g(%, _ / j f,/ L 1nspector: m. V. G. Martin, Physical $_e____c u r i ty I n s_p_e_c,t o r de e Approved by: '.O h -- - /MM ,,isard'R71e.i 'MIT date Safeguards Section, ' 55 Insp~ect ion Suma r Routine Announced Physical Security inspection on dully 2741[]$i7'y:k ep oft]{oi., $0 - N O28] maw. pol 4]Rif-30F A re a s 1.n.s.p e c t ed : Security Plan; l.ocks, Keys, and Combinations; Barrit r$ '(Protected and Vital Areas); lighting; Assessment Aids; Cetection Aids (Protected Area): Alarm Stations; Cce unicationt; Securhy Ccintingency Plan Implementation; and Training and Qualification Plan. Results: The licensee was in compliance with NRC requirnents in the areat examined, except as follcws: a degraded vital area barrier was identified by the licensee during the inspection. THE lM W/ AilW f)N THIS PA0' B;0lN1~fM.9U4fyjj] CT g.n3.,ggqCopiCS

r..

s.....y. U'1 I con _L_0L _ h . Pages

:. "~ '..gh q:
p' Fl /.: : 1554..

k.* ~~ " J..d p.w-r . lg7-* M6 a,a ~ cr-

e n 4 DETAILS 1. Key Per_5ons Contacted N,iag. ara Mohawk Power Corporat, ion D. D. O'Hara,-Assistant Nuclear Security specialist G R, Gilmor, Supervisor, Technical Services H. G. Christensen, Supervisor, Nuclear Security Clearance C. Ouderkirk, Supervisor, Nuclear Security Records J. A. Dilk, Training Instructor W. A. Mittag. Training instructor L. Stephens-Twining, Sa'eguards Information Custodian R. Miller, Captain, Security Operations R. Comins, Captain, security Operations P. Hartnett, Sergeant, Security Operations P. Salerno, Sergeant, Security Operations U1SN,.,RC W. /.. Cook, seniur Resident inspector - 2. Security _ plan The inspector reviewed the licensee's NRC-approved Physical Security Plan and determired that no changes had been made since the previous physical security inspection. 3. Lofs, Keyh and Combinations The inspector. confirmed that the licensee's key and lock control program j was being administered in accordance with the NRC approved Physical Security Plan and appropriate implementing procedures. 4. Physical Barriers,_ Protected Area The inspector observed the entire ' protected area barrier and determined that the licensee is maintaining it in accordance with the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan. 5. Physical Barriers - Vital Areas The inspector observed that the licensee maintained the physical barriers surrounding the vital areas in.conformance with the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan with the exception of the degraded vital area barrier discussed below. This degraded barrier was identified by'the licensee during the inspection-and was adequately and promptly corrected prior to completion of the inspection. 5 _. _ _o

~..-.,_-_ __,_. o. 7 ~, J.. s o (SGI) On July 28, 1987, at approximateTy DT20T,iiiTtWeeers of-the - security organization informe vision hat an unsecured had the remote ten < " access hatch" leading to tho access to th tial to allow an unauthorizec' ndividus i, which is a vital area. The' access hatch is loc x ma y 18 s ab6ve the roof of the building.. However, an existing ladder on the roo pr a potential for gaining access to the hatch and then into the vital area if-an: individual had~acce to the i roof. The door leading.onto the roof of the duilding is-locked, but not; alarmed and the key is contr% M i o edly secur' y and the f station shift supervisor. Prior to opening.this door, existing admini-strative procedures required that_the station hift super sor be f notifled. Additionally,!the walls of the building are sheer, over 20 feet high in most areas and 1,here ore, do not-present an j exploitable path to the roof. ($GI) %)) Immediate cornpensatory measures were taken by1the licensee, by-placing a guard on the roof until the hatch was' secured with a securit lock and then placing the immediate area on an hourly internal patrol. The ladder was removed on July 30 1987. -Access to the; hatch could'unty be accomplished now by scaling's sheer wall of 18 feet, which is not considered possible, -(104 The inspector determined that' the matter was not aL sign'ifican't safeguards problem and stated that it was-considered'to be-a licensee identified violation of the NRC approved Physical-Security and Safeguards Contingency Plan, Paragraph 2.2.1, I 6. l.ighting The inspector observed the: lighting within the protected area during hours of darkness (8:30 p.m. to -10:30 p.m.) on. July 29,'1987. Alll areas were lighted to levels committed to in the Nks-approved Physical Security W Plan and were suf ficient to allot detection and observation of-unauthorized activities. ] 7, Assessment _ Aids The inspector observed the operation of the'asse$5 ment. aids duringz daylight and darkness (as described above) and determined that they were functioning as committed to:in the-NRC-approved Physical $ecurity Plan.- 8. Detection Aids . Protected Area The inspector. reviewed the detection ~ aids ar und.the protected area, and v in the presence of licensee security personnel, randomly tested segments of the perimeter intrusion detectionisystem. The inspector determined the detection-aids to.be adequate:and-in accordance with the NRC-approved Physical _ Security: Plan.- . ~... - ~ . - ~ ~ ( l -f i a. -a m e, w-w e

2. _ _

4 9. Alarm Stations The inspector confirmed through direct observation that the central alarm station (CA$) and the secondary alarm station (SAS) were in conformance with the NRC-approved Physical $ecurity Plan. Both CAS and SA$ operators demonstrated adequate still and knowledge in the performance of their duties. 10. Communications The inspector observed requested testing of communications capabilities between-the central alarm station (CAS) and required on-site and of f-site locations. They were found to be in accordance with the NRC-approved Physical Security Plan. 11. Security Contingency _ Plan Implementation Review The inspector reviewed the licensee's NRC-approved security Contingency Plan and implementing procedures. The inspector noted that the licensee had conducted ten security contingency drills between Jule 22, 1987 and July 23, 1967, all of which were participated in by the operations organization, in addition, the inspector also noted that the security organization actively participated in the site emergency drill conducted on July 21, 1987. 12. Personnel Training and Qualifications - General Requirement The inspector reviewed selected training records and procedures and found them to be in *ccordance with the HRC-approved Training and Qualifications Plan. 13. Exit Interview The inspector met with the' nicensee representatives listed in paragraph 1 at the conclusion of the inspection on July M,1987. At that time, the purpose and scope of the inspection were reviewed and the findings presented. At no time during this inspection was written material provided to the licensee by the inspector. __}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML23251A032&oldid=3768506"