ML23199A149
| ML23199A149 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach  |
| Issue date: | 02/03/2023 |
| From: | NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB |
| To: | Florida Power & Light Energy Point Beach |
| Jim Nance | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML22007A029 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML23199A149 (1) | |
Text
Form 4.1-1 Record of Rejected Knowledge and Abilities Refer to Examination Standard (ES)-4.2, Developing Written Examinations, Section B.3, for deviations from the approved written examination outline.
Tier/Group Randomly Selected K/A Reason for Rejection 2/2 061G2.3.2 (001G2.2.3) Research shows there are no differences between Units 1 and 2 Rod Control system. Wanted to maintain the G2.3.2 (Unit differences) K/A. Randomly selected 061 (AUXILIARY /
EMERGENCY FEEDWATER SYSTEM) as a replacement K/A.
1/2 WE02EK3.16 (WE02EK3.16) Upon review of SI termination procedure and the method that this plant configuration uses for SD transfer (uses both PT 484 and 486), a sufficient LOD question cannot be written with this KA.
2/1 010K6.09 (010K6.09) Upon review of procedures and system design, it was not possible to create enough plausible distracters due to the direct nature of the CVCS relationship on the pressure control system.
2/2 001G2.2.3 (001G2.2.3) Upon review of system design, the rod control system has no differences between PB Units 1 and 2.
2/2 029G2.2.42)
(042G2.2.42) Upon review of systems and outline, it was agreed between NRC and site that this KA is too similar to Item 63 (MRSS) that a quality question could not be written.