ML22339A216
ML22339A216 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Issue date: | 10/12/2022 |
From: | Adrian Muniz Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
To: | |
References | |
Download: ML22339A216 (1) | |
Text
Advanced Non-Power Reactor Licensing TRTR Annual Conference October 12, 2022 Adrian Muniz, Project Manager Advanced Reactor Licensing Branch 2
Current and Prospective Advanced Non-Power Reactor Applicants
Technology: Project Status:
- TRISO pebble bed fuel, fluoride
- Construction Permit salt coolant, graphite Application submitted moderator September 2021
- Hermes testing facility
- Draft Safety Evaluation Kairos Power designed for 35 MW Thermal Power (completion by November 2022)
(Hermes)
- Facility to be located at East Tennessee Technology Park in
- Draft Environmental Oak Ridge, TN Impact Statement (ML22259A126)
- Project Number:
99902069 3
Technology: Project Status:
- Graphite moderated fluoride
- Construction Permit salt flowing fluid reactor Application submitted Abilene designed for 1 MW Thermal Power (Non-Power Molten Salt August 2022 (undergoing acceptance review)
Christian Reactor)
- Facility to be located at ACU
- Regulatory Engagement Plan submitted March University campus in Abilene, TX 2020 (ML20241A071)
- Project Number:
(ACU) 99902088 Source: ACU Regulatory Engagement Plan 4
Technology: Project Status:
- Testing facility using Ultra Safe
- Regulatory Engagement University of Nuclears high temperature gas-cooled reactor technology Plan submitted August 2022 (ML22216A059)
- NRC staff reviewing PSAR overview white paper Urbana-
- TRISO particle fuel encased within a dense silicon carbide
- NRC staff reviewed 104(c) matrix classification white paper Champaign
- Facility to be located on UIUC campus in Urbana-Champaign, IL (ML22235A764)
- Project Number:
(UIUC) 99902094 5
Draft White Paper -
Preapplication Engagement to Optimize Advanced Reactors Application Reviews (ADAMS Accession No. ML21145A106)
- Provides information to advanced reactor developers on the benefits of robust preapplication engagement in order to optimize application reviews.
Purpose
- Encourages pre-application interactions with advanced reactor developers to provide stability and predictability in the licensing process through early identification and resolution of technical and policy issues that would affect licensing.
- Proposes a set of pre-application activities that, if fully executed, will enable staff to offer more predictable and shorter schedules and other benefits during the review of an advanced reactor license application.
7
- Enhanced regulatory predictability
- Greater review efficiency
- More visibility for public on key topics Benefits of
- Early engagement and interactions with ACRS Pre-Application and other agencies
- Streamlined acceptance reviews Engagement
- Shorter full review schedules than the generic schedules
- Key Assumptions for shortened schedule Timely Responses to Requests for Additional Information (RAIs)
No Substantive Changes to Application No Significant Design Changes (Pre-application vs Application) 8
- NRC staff applied a graded approach to identify key safety and environmental Pre-Application licensing areas for pre-application engagement with advanced reactor Engagement developers Topical Reports - definitive findings White Papers, Audits and Meetings -
feedback and staff awareness 9
- Principal Design Criteria for non-light water reactors
- Process for selection of licensing basis events and classification and treatment of structures, Topical Reports systems, and components
- Fuel qualification plan and associated methodologies
- Source term methodology
- Quality Assurance Program description
- Plan for protection of safeguards information
- Safety and accident analysis methodologies 10
- Regulatory Gap Analysis Meetings,
- Policy Issues Audits and
- Consensus codes and standards and code cases
- Environmental Activities White Papers - Unique or Novel Methodologies and Issues
- Alternatives to the Proposed Project
- Cooling Water Availability
- Status of Permits and Authorizations
- Meetings on critical components of environmental reviews identified in the white paper 11
- Applicant should allow staff to conduct a pre-application readiness assessment Pre-Application - See Office Instruction LIC-116, Pre-Application Readiness Assessment, ADAMS Accession No.
Readiness ML20104B698)
- Six months prior to submittal date Assessment
- Applicant should provide most current draft of safety analysis report and environmental report, referenced documentation, and applicant staff and contractors
- Right-sized scope based on type of application and extent of pre-application activities leading up to this point 12
UNPL/UAL Collaboration
UNPL/UAL
- Support efficient review of licensing Collaboration submittals for Advanced
- Leverage Advanced Reactor Licensing Branch (UAL) experience with licensing Non-Power reviews involving novel reactor designs Reactor
- Leverage Non-Power Production and Utilization Facility Licensing Branch (UNPL)
Reviews experience with non-power reactor licensing, and associated regulations, guidance, and precedents 14
UNPL/UAL
- Project Managers (PMs) from both UAL and UNPL are assigned for each advanced non-power reactor Collaboration applicant or prospective applicant, as appropriate for Advanced
- UAL PM: Primary contact, and primary Project Non-Power Management responsibility for each applicant or prospective applicant Reactor Reviews
- UNPL PM: Primary UNPL resource for each applicant or prospective applicant, to provide expertise and ensure consistency with non-power reactor guidance (e.g., NUREG-1537) and precedents 15
16 Questions?