ML22186A194
| ML22186A194 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 11/08/2017 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17068A445 | List: |
| References | |
| L-17-281 | |
| Download: ML22186A194 (2) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC developed Written Examination Outline sent
,..--..._ to the Facility ONLY Facility: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Date of Examination: FebruaQ/ 5 -16, 2018 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
~
- 1. a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N. N/A 00')
w b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with R
I Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. ow; N/A
~
T T
C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. cm? NIA ~
E N
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
o4j N/A "t.43
~ V
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s
v v /
I'- transients.
I b ~ whe1hec the,e a,e eoocgh soeoa,;, sets (aod spa,es) tn test lhe projected o,mbec aod M
u L
A mI f applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule witho ~romising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested least one ew or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' iupit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
usi1/
T 0
R C. Te the *~'"' ~~* assess whethec<he eornoe(s) wofo=s .;th the quantitative criteria s citied on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D a in
~
Section D.5, "Specific ~~ions for the 'Simulator Operating Test, "' of ES- 1 (including overlap).
- 3. a . Verify that the systems walkthr~~utline meets the criteria specifi on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the req i~umber of control roo nd in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as sp . *ried on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG ~ inations is
- in the limits specified on the fonn.
L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applica 's audit st(s).
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets o X eds the minimums specified on the fonn.
IS' T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, e e ency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R 0 b. v";fy M the adm;o;strab,e c,;reoa speiffied oo Focm ES,30H u (1) The tasks are distributed amon e topics as specified ~ m .
G (2) At least one task is new or si ificantly modified.
H (3) No more than one task is pealed from the last two NRG licensI g examinations.
C. Determine whether t ~enough different outlines to test the project~ ~ber and mix of applicants and ensur at no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4. a. Assess whe~~tt-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment a~~dual plant examin on insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G E
N E
- b. Assess~her the 10 CFR 55.41 , 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
C. E ~ that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
"" '~
y R g/"check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.
V
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. ""'
a.
b.
f.
Author Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
Facility Reviewer(*)
Charles D. Zoia Printed ('me/SigUtur\) ")
I N/A
~L " -
(
Date N/A
,~Lb L2Pri ~
C. NRG Chief Examiner(#) Randal D. Baker I c:~~\-uL _ 1ls}2ft_7 A,, .o1 .. 1R .
- d. NRG Supervisor Robert J. Orlikowski I l l{V ' IJfUVr ......_ i.lb>t~a I
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facilitv Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station Date of Examination: 2/5/2018 to 2/16/2018 Initials Item Task Description a b* c#
- a. Verify that the outline(s) flt(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. (j) (D
. ~i..(\
1.
w -
R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 (j) (j)
I of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriatelv sampled. ~
T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
T (j) (j) ~
E d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
N (j) (j)
~
~...... JP ~
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures , technical specifications, and major transients.
s b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of I
~
applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without M
u compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and '~ '?~
L that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
A T C. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative ~
0 criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific CZ>
{~
R Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,'" of ES-301 (including overlap).
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among w the safety functions as specified on the form .
A K
L (2)
(3)
Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
5t1r ~ ~
T H (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
R 0 (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area tasks u meets the criteria on the form.
G H b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :
(1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. ~)-
(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
)f ~
(3) No more than one task is re peated from the last two NRC licensinQ examinations.
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subseauent days.
~t OP ~
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant 4.
examination insic!hts) are covered in the aooropriate exam sections. So~ ~ ~
G E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. ?\- ~ ~
N E
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. ~t- :sp ~
R A
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. s,,r J"P 00 L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. 'fuk :::5f, ~
Printed Name I Signature Date
- a. Author T.A Ga:r:doslk :f""o ./4-c..~~ j Is-l 11
- b. Facility Reviewer(*) J.D Phillippe 7 c..e -~, '
' 4 *1 , ------=
q/GI (7 C. NRC Chief Examiner(#) ~~bf\L \~~ K,_~ /'~p.9_ 0 - ~ q(J.1/#
I
~
I
- d. NRC Supervisor
~
~\).,\p ~cb;[t ~. ex,-.~~~li f At 7
, ~'
Note:
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
<D Item 1 Written Exam Outlines were generated by NRC.
@ Item 2.c to be completed following scenario development and validation, this form will be resubmitted with the Exam materials NUREG-1021 , Revision 11 FENOC Facsimile Rev. 0