ML22186A194
| ML22186A194 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 11/08/2017 |
| From: | Randy Baker NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | |
| Baker R | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17068A445 | List: |
| References | |
| L-17-281 | |
| Download: ML22186A194 (2) | |
Text
,..--..._
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the NRC developed Written Examination Outline sent to the Facility ONLY Facility: Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Date of Examination: FebruaQ/ 5 -16, 2018 Item Task Description Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
00')
N/A ~
w
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with
~
R Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
ow; N/A I
T C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
cm?
NIA ~
T E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
o4j N/A "t.43 N
~
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of V
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major s
I'-
/
I vv M
b~
whe1hec the,e a,e eoocgh soeoa,;, sets (aod spa,es) tn test lhe projected o,mbec aod u
mI f applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
witho ~romising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested usi1/
A least one ew or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T
applicants' iupit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 Te the *~'"' ~~* assess whethec<he eornoe(s) wofo=s.;th the ~
R C.
quantitative criteria s citied on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D a in Section D.5, "Specific ~~ions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-1 (including overlap).
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walkthr~~utline meets the criteria specifi on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The outline(s) contains the req i~umber of control roo nd in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as sp. *ried on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG ~
inations is
- in the limits specified on the fonn.
L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applica 's audit st(s).
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets o X
eds the minimums specified on the fonn.
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, e e ency, and radiologically controlled area H
tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R v";fy M the adm;o;strab,e IS' c,;reoa speiffied oo Focm ES,30H 0
- b.
u (1) The tasks are distributed amon e topics as specified ~m.
G (2) At least one task is new or si ificantly modified.
H (3) No more than one task is pealed from the last two NRG licensI g examinations.
C. Determine whether t~
enough different outlines to test the project~~ber and mix of applicants and ensur at no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
- 4.
- a. Assess whe~~tt-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment a~~dual plant examin on insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
G Assess~her the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
E
- b.
N E~ that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
'~
E C.
g/"check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.
R y
V
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).
Printed ('me/SigUtur\\) ")
Date
- a.
Author Charles D. Zoia I
~L
,~Lb L2Pri ~
- b.
Facility Reviewer(*)
N/A
(
N/A C.
NRG Chief Examiner(#)
Randal D. Baker I c:~~\\-uL _
1ls}2ft_7
- d.
NRG Supervisor Robert J. Orlikowski I A,,.o1.. 1R.
i.lb>t~a l l{V ' IJfUVr......_
I
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRG reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facilitv Davis Besse Nuclear Power Station Date of Examination: 2/5/2018 to 2/16/2018 Initials Item Task Description a
b*
c#
- 1.
(j)
(D
~i..(\\
w R
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 (j)
(j)
~
I of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriatelv sampled.
T
- c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
(j)
(j)
~
T E
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
~
N (j)
(j)
- 2.
- a.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal
~
...... JP ~
evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
s
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of I
applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without
~
M compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or
'~ '?~
u significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and L
that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
A T
C.
To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative
~
CZ> {~
0 criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific R
Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,'" of ES-301 (including overlap).
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
w (1)
The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A 5t1r L
(2)
Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
~
K
~
T (3)
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
H (4)
The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
R 0
(5)
The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area tasks u
meets the criteria on the form.
G
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1 :
H (1)
The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
~)- )f ~
(2)
At least one task is new or significantly modified.
(3)
No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensinQ examinations.
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of
~t OP ~
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subseauent days.
- 4.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual examination insic!hts) are covered in the aooropriate exam sections.
plant So~ ~ ~
G E
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
?\\- ~ ~
N
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
~t- :sp ~
E R
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
s,,r J"P 00 A
L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
'fuk :::5f,
~
~"~ :::1? ?~
Printed Name I Signature Date
- a. Author T.A Ga:r:doslk
- f""o./4-c..~~
j I s-l 11
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
J.D Phillippe
-~, '
q /GI (7 c..e 4
- 1, ------=
7 C. NRC Chief Examiner(#) ~~bf\\L \\~~ K,_~ /'~p.9_ 0-~
q(J.1/#
f
~
I I
~
~cb;[t ~. ex,-.~~~ i A t
~'
- d. NRC Supervisor ~\\).,\\p l
7 Note:
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
<D Item 1 Written Exam Outlines were generated by NRC.
@ Item 2.c to be completed following scenario development and validation, this form will be resubmitted with the Exam materials NUREG-1021, Revision 11 FENOC Facsimile Rev. 0