ML22031A212

NRR E-mail Capture - Comanche Peak - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action - Proposed Alternative to Extend the Snubber Inservice Program Third Interval

ML22031A212
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak
Issue date:	01/31/2022
From:	Dennis Galvin NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL4
To:	Hicks J Vistra Operations Company
References
L 2022-LLR-0002
Download: ML22031A212 (3)

Text

From: Galvin, Dennis Sent: Monday, January 31, 2022 12:26 PM To: Jack Hicks (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)

Cc: Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer; Struble, Garry

Subject:

Comanche Peak - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action - Proposed Alternative to Extend the Snubber Inservice Program Third Interval (EPID: L 2022-LLR-0002)

Dear Mr. Hicks,

By [[letter::CP-202100751, (CPNPP) - ASME OM Inservice Test Program Relief Request SNB-3, Snubber Inservice Program Third Internal Extension|letter dated January 4, 2022]] (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML22004A025), as supplemented by [[letter::CP-202200041, (CPNPP) - Supplement to ASME OM Inservice Test Program Relief Request SNB-3, Snubber Inservice Program Third Interval Extension|letter dated January 27, 2022]] (ADAMS Accession No. ML22025A411), Vistra Operations Company LLC (the licensee) submitted a proposed alternative to the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code) at Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant (Comanche Peak) Units 1 and 2. The proposed alternative would align the ten year interval requirements of the OM Code, Section ISTD, "Snubbers" to the OM Code Sections ISTB and ISTC, "Pumps and valves" to combine all OM Code inservice test programs into one interval.

The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) staffs acceptance review of this proposed relief request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Pursuant to Sections 50.55a(z)(1) and 50.55a(z)(2) of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed alternatives would provide an acceptable level of quality and safety, or that compliance with the specified requirements of Section 50.55a would result in hardship or unusual difficulty without a compensating increase in the level of quality or safety.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it provides technical information in sufficient detail to enable the staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed relief request in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review, as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the staffs detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 80 hours9.259259e-4 days <br />0.0222 hours <br />1.322751e-4 weeks <br />3.044e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by April 18, 2022. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes

in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staffs initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, and unanticipated addition of scope to the review. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications.

Please contact me with any questions.

Respectfully, Dennis Galvin Project Manager U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Licensing Project Branch 4 301-415-6256 Docket Nos. 50-445, 50-446

Hearing Identifier: NRR_DRMA Email Number: 1501 Mail Envelope Properties (SA1PR09MB8111087D6637D6EA5F3FD6E3FB259)

Subject:

Comanche Peak - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action - Proposed Alternative to Extend the Snubber Inservice Program Third Interval (EPID: L 2022-LLR-0002)

Sent Date: 1/31/2022 12:25:34 PM Received Date: 1/31/2022 12:25:00 PM From: Galvin, Dennis Created By: Dennis.Galvin@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer" <Jennifer.Dixon-Herrity@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Struble, Garry" <Garry.Struble@luminant.com>

Tracking Status: None "Jack Hicks (Jack.Hicks@luminant.com)" <Jack.Hicks@luminant.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: SA1PR09MB8111.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 3748 1/31/2022 12:25:00 PM Options Priority: Normal Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: