ML22024A203
| ML22024A203 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 07000925 |
| Issue date: | 01/11/2022 |
| From: | Lux J Burns & McDonnell |
| To: | Saxton J, James Smith NRC/NMSS/DDUWP/URMDB |
| Smith J | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML22024A183 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML22024A203 (3) | |
Text
1 Saxton, John From:
Lux, Jeff J <jlux@burnsmcd.com>
Sent:
Tuesday, January 11, 2022 9:59 AM To:
Smith, James; Saxton, John Cc:
Halliburton, Bill
Subject:
[External_Sender] RE: RE: Kd Paper TheJuly12document,accessionnumberML16203A251,isthecorrectdocument-theonethatwasformally submittedtotheNRC.TheJuly5document,accessionnumberML20204A867,isthedraftthateitherJillZaitzorI uploadedin2020-thisistheonethatshouldnthavebeenuploadedatall.
IhaderroneouslyheardJohnSaxtonsay8,whenheactuallysaidA.ThatswhyIsearchedforandcouldntfind, andwhyyoudontseeML16028251inADAMS-the8shouldhavebeenanA.OnceIchangedthe8toanA,I wasabletoseethedocumentinADAMS.
Ibelievetheonlydifferencebetweenthetwodocumentsisthatonesentencewasaddedtothedraftbeforesubmitting thepapertotheNRC.Itsthelastsentenceinthefirstparagraphonpage6,beginningwith,AhighervalueforKd wouldbeexpected,.
AsIsaidearlier,itisnotimportanttomewhetherornottheJuly5documentisremovedfromADAMS.Ijustthought thatsincethatdocumentwasneverformallysubmittedtotheNRC,andyoualreadyhavetheonethatwasformally submitted(theJuly12document),therewasnoreasontohavetheJuly5documentinthere.
Jeff Lux 405-642-5152
From:Smith,James<James.Smith@nrc.gov>
Sent:Tuesday,January11,20228:40AM To:Lux,JeffJ<jlux@burnsmcd.com>;Saxton,John<John.Saxton@nrc.gov>
Cc:Halliburton,Bill<bhalli@burnsmcd.com>
Subject:
RE:RE:KdPaper
Jeff-I didnt have a chance to do the SUNSI review you requested yesterday, but this morning I tried to find the document ML162038251 to do a SUNSI review. I do not see the document ML162038251 in ADAMS at all, but I do see a publicly available document ML16203A251 dated July 12, 2016, which doesnt require a SUNSI review. I do see the document ML20204A867 dated July 5, 2016 in ADAMS and it is publicly available, so it doesnt need a SUNSI review.
Upon a quick glance ML16203A251 and ML20204A867 seems to be identical except for the date. I assume that one of them has the erroneous sentence you were referring to, but I havent spotted it yet. Can you confirm that the document ML16203A251 is the one that you want deleted, retracted?
Thanks Jim
2
From:Lux,JeffJ<jlux@burnsmcd.com>
Sent:Monday,January10,20229:51AM To:Smith,James<James.Smith@nrc.gov>;Saxton,John<John.Saxton@nrc.gov>
Cc:Halliburton,Bill<bhalli@burnsmcd.com>
Subject:
[External_Sender]RE:KdPaper
Basically,the7/5/2016documentweelectronicallysubmittedforADAMSin2020(ML20204A867)wasneverformally submittedtotheNRC;itwasadraftdocumentthatwehadretainedinourfiles.Theformalsubmittal,dated7/12/2016 (ML162038251),hadbeenunbeknownsttousuploadedtoADAMSbyNRCstaff-butsinceithadntbeenmadepublicly available,wedidntknowitwasinADAMS.
Thedifferencebetweenthetwodocumentsisasinglesentencethatwasaddedtothe7/5draftinthe7/12 submittal.Itsnotimportanttoremovethe7/5draftfromADAMS-Ijustthoughtitwasaconvenientwaytoeliminate confusionbetweenthetwo.IfittakesasignificantefforttoremovethedocumentfromADAMS,Idontthinkitsworth thetimeandexpense.
Jeff Lux 405-642-5152
From:Smith,James<James.Smith@nrc.gov>
Sent:Monday,January10,20228:45AM To:Lux,JeffJ<jlux@burnsmcd.com>;Saxton,John<John.Saxton@nrc.gov>
Cc:Halliburton,Bill<bhalli@burnsmcd.com>
Subject:
RE:KdPaper
Hi Jeff-I am not sure I follow all of that, but if you are asking us to delete a record from ADAMS, thats something that I just cant do at my level. Some documents have been deleted shortly, within a week before they have been released to the public, usually two weeks after being declared as a public record, after being placed into ADAMS in the past. However, my recollection is that it cant be done, at least not easily without at least permission from an Office Director and some guidance from the Document Control Center staff.
I can ask the Document Control Center staff to see if it is possible and, if so, what would be necessary to remove a document from ADAMS. Although I dont know for sure, I think I would need a letter referencing the Accession number of the document and an explanation as to why it should be removed. Can you give me the accession number, so I can check with the DCC staff.
Thanks Jim
3
From:Lux,JeffJ<jlux@burnsmcd.com>
Sent:Saturday,January08,20229:01AM To:Saxton,John<John.Saxton@nrc.gov>;Smith,James<James.Smith@nrc.gov>
Cc:Halliburton,Bill<bhalli@burnsmcd.com>
Subject:
[External_Sender]KdPaper
Duringourmeetingyesterday,youreferredtotwosubmittalsregardingthedeterminationofthedistributioncoefficient foruranium:onedatedJuly5,2016,andonedatedJuly12,2016.YouprovidedmetheaccessionnumberfortheJuly 12,2016submittal,andstatedthatthetwosubmittalscontainedoneslightdifference.Isearchedforbothofthose submittalsintheCERTrepositoryandlearnedthefollowing.
Whenpreparingthedecommissioningplan,IsearchedforthesubmittalinADAMS,andIcouldnotfindit(ithadnot beenmadepublic).IassumeditwasntinADAMS,andfoundtheentirereportinasubmittedreportsfolderinthe CERTrepository.Thiswasa7/5/2016draftofthereport.IsubmittedittoADAMSin2020.
AfteryouexplainedthatthesubmittalhadbeenuploadedtoADAMSin2016,Isearchedtherepository,andfoundthe 7/12/2016finalcopy.Itcontainedonesentencethatthe7/5/2016filedidnotcontain.This7/12/16reportistheone forwhichahardcopywithattachedCDwassubmittedtotheNRC.
IvedeletedthedraftreportfromtheCERTrepository,anditshouldberemovedfromADAMS,asitwasnever submittedtotheNRC(shouldneverhavebeensubmittedtoADAMS).IalsorevisedboththetextoftheDPlanandthe referenceinSection17oftheDPlantoprovidethe7/12/2016dateandthecorrectaccessionnumber.
IfyouwouldpleaseperformtheSUNSIreviewofthe7/12/2016submittalsoitcouldbemadepubliclyavailable,Id appreciateit.Thanks.
Jeff Lux, P.E.
Project Manager Environmental Properties Management LLC A Subsidiary of Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.
405-642-5152