ML22024A202

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
11-29-2021 Email from J Smith to J Lux Cimarrons Response to Audit Files
ML22024A202
Person / Time
Site: 07000925
Issue date: 11/29/2021
From: James Smith
NRC/NMSS/DDUWP/URMDB
To: Lux J
Burns & McDonnell
Smith J
Shared Package
ML22024A183 List:
References
Download: ML22024A202 (3)


Text

1 Saxton, John From:

Smith, James Sent:

Monday, November 29, 2021 10:46 AM To:

Lux, Jeff J Cc:

Halliburton, Bill; Saxton, John; Pineda, Christine; Burrows, Ronald; Pinkston, Karen; Von Till, Bill; McKenney, Chris

Subject:

RE: RE: Files Uploaded to the NRC Information Response Team Attachments:

James Smith.vcf Thanks Jeff-Again this is all voluntary on your part so that we can be sure that there wont be any gaps resulting in a non-acceptance letter.

Jim

From:Lux,JeffJ<jlux@burnsmcd.com>

Sent:Monday,November29,202110:37AM To:Smith,James<James.Smith@nrc.gov>

Cc:Halliburton,Bill<bhalli@burnsmcd.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender]RE:FilesUploadedtotheNRCInformationResponseTeam

Jim,aswediscussedonthephone,itwasmyunderstandingthatthepurposeofthisauditwastoidentifyanygapsin ourresponsestoyourrequestsforinformationthatwouldresultinanonacceptanceletter,sayingweneedtoprovide yetmoreinformationbeforetheNRCcaninitiatethetechnicalreviewofthedecommissioningplan(DP).PerhapsIhas anoversimplifiedunderstandingoftheprocess,butIthoughttheNRCwouldreviewourresponsestoyourrequestsfor information.

Insomecases,wethoughttheresponsetoarequestforinformationresultedinnumerouschangesinthetextoftheDP, suchasremovingreferencestoaphasedremediation,eliminatingtreatmentfornitrate,etc.Fortheseresponses,we simplystatedthatthechangeswerepresentthroughouttheDP.

Insomecases,wethoughttheresponseshouldnotbeaddresseddirectlyintheDP.Forinstance,itwouldnotbe practicaltoincludethecomprehensiveanalyticaldatasetandthesoilboringlogsandmonitorwellinstallationdiagrams forthehundredsofwellthatareorhadbeenpresentatthesite.ThatinformationwasprovidedtotheNRC separately.SomeoftheinformationwassummarizedintabularforminnewtablesintheDP.

2 Requestsforinformationrelatedtoradiationprotectionwereaddressedintheradiationprotectionplan,whichis AppendixMtotheDP.

ChangestomanyofthefiguresandtablesprovidedfortheauditweremadenottorespondtotheNRCsrequestfor information,butbecausetherevisionstotheDPweresosignificantthattheDPreceivedanewrevisionnumber.

ItwasmyunderstandingthatifNRCreviewersbelievedthatwehadnotadequatelyrespondedtoarequestfor information,wewouldbeabletofillinanygapbeforeformallysubmittingtheDP.Theresultofadequatelyresponding toallthoserequestsforinformationwouldthenmeanthattheNRCwouldcompletetheacceptancereviewoftheDP andthenextsetofrequestsforinformationwouldbeRAIsbasedonthetechnicalreviewoftheDP.

IdonotunderstandwhyareviewerwouldneedalistofchangestodetermineifweprovidedtheinformationtheNRC requested.Nevertheless,Iwillprovidealistoffiguresandtablesthatrepresentchangesofsubstanceifthatwould help.Iwillnotincludefiguresortablesforwhichthechangeswereeditorial,likechangingtherevnumber,correcting spellingerrors,fixingbordersontablesforwhichtheinformationinthetabledidntchange,etc.

IalsodidnotincludeinthefilesontheMicrosoftTEAMSsitethoseappendicesthatwerenotchanged,astherewereno requestsforinformationrelatedtothoseappendices.IwillbehappytouploadanyappendicesthattheNRCrequeststo theMicrosoftTEAMSsiteatyourrequest.

Jeff Lux 405-642-5152

From:Smith,James<James.Smith@nrc.gov>

Sent:Monday,November29,20218:47AM To:Lux,JeffJ<jlux@burnsmcd.com>

Subject:

FW:FilesUploadedtotheNRCInformationResponseTeam

Jeff I got a request from one of the reviewers.

I am not sure what has changed on some of the figures - e.g. Figure 3.6. I could spend hours trying to identify. Jeff should provide a list of the changes, similar to most engineering firms change blocks for their drawings.

I didnt see Appendix I, appendix J or the DP text.

I responded As far as the changes to some of the figures - e.g. Figure 3.6. Ill ask Jeff if he is willing provide a list of the changes, similar to most engineering firms change blocks for their drawings. However, its my understanding with the audit process is voluntary and they can provide whatever they want audited and that we cant officially request anything, except during a public meeting.

I.e., you dont have to provide a list of changes, or any Appendices or the DP Text, unless you want to have it included in the audit.

Thanks Jim

3

From:Lux,JeffJ<jlux@burnsmcd.com>

Sent:Monday,November22,20219:43PM To:Smith,James<James.Smith@nrc.gov>;Burrows,Ronald<Ronald.Burrows@nrc.gov>;Pineda,Christine

<Christine.Pineda@nrc.gov>;Pinkston,Karen<Karen.Pinkston@nrc.gov>;Saxton,John<John.Saxton@nrc.gov>;J.Paul Davis<j.paul.davis@deq.ok.gov>;mike.broderick<mike.broderick@deq.ok.gov>

Cc:Halliburton,Bill<bhalli@burnsmcd.com>;Hesemann,John<jhesemann@burnsmcd.com>;JayMaisler

<jmaisler@enercon.com>;EarlLloyd<earl.lloyd@vnsfs.com>

Subject:

[External_Sender]FilesUploadedtotheNRCInformationResponseTeam

ThiseveningIuploadedallthefilesneededfortheNRCtoreviewourresponsetotheNRCsAugust11,2021requestfor information.Respondingtotherequestsforinformationinvolvedacompleterevisionofthetext,figures,andtablesof thedecommissioningplan,aswellasAppendixI,RemediationInfrastructureDesignDrawings,AppendixJ, GroundwaterTreatmentSystemDesignDrawings,andAppendixM,RadiationProtectionPlan.

Therewerefartoomanydrawingsorfigurestocompileintosinglefiles,soAppendicesIandJ,andthefigureswereall placedinfoldersintheNRCInformationResponseTeamsite.Thedecommissioningplantextandtables,aswellas AppendixM,couldallbeuploadedassinglefiles.

Note:Section16,FinancialAssuranceandTables161through164(whichpresentcostestimates)willundergo continuingrevisionasthecostsforcalendaryear2022willberevisedtoconformtothebudgetfor2022whichisstill beingprepared.

Thedecommissioningplanandtheradiationprotectionplanarebeingsubmittedinformallyonthissiteasdraft documents.Rev3ofthedecommissioningplanmaybefurtherrevisedbasedonNRCsreviewofourresponsetotheir requestforinformation,butIbelievetheywillnotbesosignificantastorequireanotherrevision.Itisourintentto furtherreviseRev3asneededbasedontheNRCsdetailedtechnicalreviewofthedecommissioningplan,andthe finalRev3willbetherevisionthatiseventuallyreferencedinthelicenseamendmentthatauthorizesustoproceedto constructionandoperationofgroundwaterremediationfacilities.

Jeff Lux, P.E.

Project Manager Environmental Properties Management LLC A Subsidiary of Burns & McDonnell Engineering Company, Inc.

405-642-5152