ML21056A220

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Final Qa/Related Forms (Folder 1)
ML21056A220
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  
Issue date: 06/30/2020
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To: Todd Fish
Operations Branch I
Shared Package
ML19105A151 List:
References
CAC 000500
Download: ML21056A220 (14)
v • d • e


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Facility: PBAPS Date of Examination: 6/1-11/2020 Developed by: Written: Facility ~ NRC II Operating: Facility ~ NRC Target Task Description (Reference) Chief Examiner's

  • Date*

Initials

1.

Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a; C.2.a-b ). For NRG-prepared exams, -240 arrangements are made for the facility to submit reference materials (C.1.e; C.3.c;

  • ff ).

-210

2.

NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.f). -rf

3.

Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c). As applicable, the -210 facility contact submits to the NRC any prescreened K/As for elimination from the written 1f examination outline, with a description of the facility's prescreening process (ES-401, D.1.b). -210

4.

Reference material due for NRG-prepared exams (C.1.e; C.3.c; Attachment 3). fJ~ ) ~ -210

5.

Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.e).

6.

NRG-developed written examination outline (ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2 and ES-401-3 or -195 ES-401 N-3) sent to facility contact (must be on the exam security agreement) (C.1.e-f; ('lr-c: C.2.h; C.3.d-e). -150

7.

Operating test outline(s) and other checklists due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3, -cf ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-301-5, and ES-D-1, as applicable (C.1.e-f; C.3.d-e). -136

8.

Operating test outline(s) reviewed by the NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee ff (C.2.h; C.3.d-e).

9.

Proposed examinations (written, JPMs, and scenarios, as applicable) and outlines (Forms ES-301-1, ES-301-2, ES-D-1, ES-401-1/2 or ES-401N-1/2, and ES-401-3 or ES-401N-3); -(f -75 supporting documentation (including Forms ES-301-3, ES-301-4, ES-301-5, ES-301-6, ES-401-6, ES-401N~6, and any Form ES-201-2 and ES-201-3 updates); and reference materials due (C.1.e-h; C.3.d). -75

10. Examinations prepared by the NRC are approved by the NRC supervisor and forwarded

~~ for facility licensee review (C.1.i; C.2.h; C.3.f--g). -60

11. Preliminary waiver/excusal requests due (C.1.m; C.2.c; ES-202).

-(f -50

12. Written exam and operating test reviews completed (C.3.f).

~ -35

13. Examination review results discussed between the NRC: and facility licensee (C.1.i; C.1.k-

-(\\ I; C.2.h; C.3.g). The NRC and the facility licensee conduct exam preparatory week. -7

14. Preliminary license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form

~ 398) due (C.1.m; C.2.i; ES-202). -7

15. Final license applications and waiver/excusal requests, as applicable (NRC Form 398),

-ef due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.m; C.2.k; ES-202). -7

16. Written examinations and operating tests approved by the NRC supervisor (C.2.j-k; C.3.h).

~ -7

17. Request facility licensee management feedback on the examination (C.2.1).

f(

18. Final applications reviewed; one or two (if more than 10) applications audited to confirm

~( -7 qualifications/eligibility; and examination approval and waiver/excusal letters sent (C.2.k; ; ES-202, C.3.j; ES-204).

  • Target dates are based on facility-prepared examinations and the examination date identified in the corporate notification Jetter. These dates are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination with the facility licensee.

ES-201 1 Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination -fJ I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRG) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of tit-C./fl'J.0J'as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who ha've not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRG (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any_indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination 1J """ To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRG licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of 6/ 1 *b/A2o_ From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically-noted below and authorized by the NRG. PRINTED NAME 9 ~==-'--'---'~!...!....:...:........,,,;L_ 1, 11--'i4'-.:::;.;>1............ --'¥-i-"--....:..:....,- 1 1 1 15----'-----'---'-"--'-'-=-+-~~~ NOTES: JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY SI ~ q,,.;/J,,, \\" s~1~...-o-{f ~(4_ -tMO..l[. Jv~ d Pot.fn.?LL. 4.fd-"""t<<t DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE ffft-2c>_r_ lo-t ~2-il -,- -(- ir...1µ141=-:: --l -

--r

>_J_ I -,- _J_ -I-

ES-201 1 Form ES-201-3 Pre-Examination:-\\f tl

1.

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of 61 t - 6/.%127> as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination ,-yr ti: To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning tt,e NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of f9!, -bltJU? From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME

1. &ttm. 1/4,Af#IAIW
2. '51Z-IA-t-! \\Z SAi L:cy' 3.9,1'\\iel 1-F\\\\.t VIV\\
4. ASo'YI /f!., ~ 'dsoe s.s~q~

6 I S. ,-,efP(~

7. -;Jo4.-J hcuCr-1t-E£:7'1'
8. Ri, c..-. ---re...,,,.s Ly 7 9.G,,,,.,, to... ~,,__@'>,:,

10 :1ot'1 fk,9c I 11. /Y'l.1tt/42w dlltlMllltf-'{ d

12. 51<AulU::'/

}pi.,,1£1..L

13. i1 :t..f.h1,LU_ /£..1;,L.~
14. ~~I) ~wl 1~1 1s. -~a.

. er5en NOTES: ..Sg..q \\JALIDATD'i2- '-I <c,f?-0_~~~--A----- >lj e,/z..o_--==~----'-'k----- G/ti/3.0 &(c/'ZD ---;ffe,~-IHf-fHr--i,;'---,r,r----:::;;,.-"'- ~~+--=------

ES-201 1 Form ES-201-3

1.

Pre-Examination \\ l.* w I acknowledge t at I h v acquired specialized knowledge about the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing examinations scheduled for the week(s) of , io as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who ha e not been authorized by the NRC's chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these licensing examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the facility licensee's procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility management or the NRC's chief examiner any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2.

Post-Examination \\ \\ r)f To the best of my knowt~dgeflJ1did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the NRC licensing examinations administered during the week(s) of C!r-~Jl!/,to. From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate; or provideperformance feedback to those applicants who were administered these licensing examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by the NRC. PRINTED NAME

1. 5~v--- :S:e1r'.!ts 2...JAM'es CJ2,d~,J

~: J,k"':/J, &-z!:k ~:e.rit~d:f

8. _______ _
9. _______ _
10. _______ _
11. _______ _
12. _______ _
13. _______ _
14. _______ _
15. _______ _

NOTES: JOB TITLE/ RESPONSIBILITY 6-i> 2 1::1'\\-!) b._ ~ OPS tN:&~ flu c5c)IL a f' 5 IUS'1'7</A/4."fblZ o Ps ~iJS~CtOL SIGNATURE (1)

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facili : Peach Bottom Date of Examination: 6/1/2020 0 eratin Test Number: 2020 NRC

a.
b.
1. General Criteria The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sam *

., 1 O CFR 55.45, o erational im function distribution. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination.

c.

The o eratin test shall not du licate items from the a licants' audit test s see Section D.1.a..

d.
e.
a.

Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acce table limits. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent a licants at the desi nated license level.

2. Walkthrough Criteria Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally important specific performance criteria that include-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of ste s if a licable

b.

Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walkthrough a outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC C rf-examinations s ecified on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4, and a co is attached.
a.

Author Chris Ferrara

b.

Facility Reviewer(*)

c.

NRC Chief Examiner (#)

d.

NRG Supervisor

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. The inde endent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is re uired.

Initials b*

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Peach Bottom Date of Exam: 6/1/2020 Scenario Numbers: 1 / 2 / 3 Operating Test No.: 2020 NRC QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, err ~ 1f but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events. Lr/- ?hf?__ !~

3.

Each event description consists of the following: the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event (Fl ~ tf' the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. C r,t-I~ ~

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete er!- ?i;f__ {(/ evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. rf:12__ {f Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. vrf-Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered. err IW<_ ~ ~

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance err "(r deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional ~ fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. rrf ~ ~

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the r:,f a-t2._ {(

form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable er/- fff(Z_ _/~

rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.) \\,

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified ell ~

{v on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when rrl ~ I~

possible. I

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

('I'~ %1<_ I~ Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 / 1 /2 t:/r ~ ~

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4 / 4 /4 r::d t?f-R <ef

3.

Major transients (1-2) 1 / 2 / 1 rrr' &iC I,!(

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 / 1 /2 crf- ~{<.._ I&

5.

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (z: 1 per scenario 1 / 1 /0 {If-R6£ t set)

6.

Preidentified critical tasks (z: 2) 3 / 3 /2 r r;::- ~ {:

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Peach Bottom Date of Exam: 6/1/2020 Scenario Numbers: 4 / I Operating Test No.: 2020 NRC QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a b* c#

1.

The initial conditions are realistic in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, Cl"/,-- 'fl:fZ_ 1V but it does not cue the operators into expected events.

2.

The scenarios consist mostly of related events. 1(0:: ~ 1-rY

3.

Each event description consists of the following: the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event [/'? "fv the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew ~ the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)

4.

The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics. er{- ?Uc_ ~

5.

Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable and allows the examination team to obtain complete ca::.. 9f1l-kl' evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.

6.

If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates. I~ llt' Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints. (ff--- Cues are given.

7.

The simulator modeling is not altered. err- ~ {((

8.

The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d),,any open simulator performance deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional Cr?- ~ t{ fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.

9.

Scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301. ~*r.,t:- ~ t-

10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301-6 (submit the

('rr 9liZ. ~ form along with the simulator scenarios).

11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable i:::.-r...c ffrZ ~

rating factors. (Competency rating factors as described on Forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)

12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified (Yr ~

\\~ on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).

13. Applicants are evaluated on a similar number of preidentified critical tasks across scenarios, when er.? ~

~ possible.

14. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.

er;:. 71JfZ__ ~ Target Quantitative Attributes per Scenario (See Section D.5.d) Actual Attributes

1.

Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 1 / I Cr~ WC.. '-tf

2.

Abnormal events (2-4) 4/ I crf >¥-12_...,'(. \\1-

3.

Major transients (1-2) 21 I Cr./ <;(ii "Cd/

4.

EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2/ I crl-- r.;(-rf t\\]

5.

Entry into a contingency EOP with substantive actions (:: 1 per scenario 1 / I <YI-W<._ {!/ set) --~'

6.

Preidentified critical tasks (:: 2) 2/ I rrf f1!l2- /.t.,, \\)

  • The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
  1. An independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; chief examiner concurrence is required.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Peach Bottom Date of Exam: 6/1/2020 Operating Test No.: 2020 NRC A E Scenarios p V 1 2 3 4 T M

p.

E L N CRl;:W CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 I I T POSITION T N I C A I s A B s A B s A B s A B M A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 L u N y 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p M(*) T p E R I kl RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I1 X I/C 3,4,5 2,3,4 5,6 10 4 4 2 SRO-U ,6 ,5 MAJ 7 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 3,4,5 4(2) 5 0 2 2 RX 2 5 1 RO 3 1 1 0 NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I2 I/C 3,6 2,3,4 3,4,5 10 4 4 2 X ,7 ,6 SRO-U MAJ 7 8 7 3 2 2 1 TS 3,4 3,4 4 0 2 2 RO-1 RX 5 1 1 1 0 X NOR 1 1 SRO-I 2 1 1 1 1/C 4,5 2,6,7 2,4 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 7 8 6 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RO-2 RX 2 1 1 1 0 X NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I I/C 3,4,7 3,5 3,4 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 8 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (1/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Peach Bottom Date of Exam: 6/1/2020 Operating Test No.: 2020 NRC A E Scenarios p V 1 2 3 4 T M p E L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 I I T POSITION T N I C s A B s A B s A B s A B A M A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 L u N y 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p M(*) T p E R I u RO RX 2 2 1 3 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-r3 X I/C 3,4,5 2,3,4 5,6 10 4 4 2 SRO-U ,6 ,5 MAJ 7 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 3,4,5 4(2) 5 0 2 2 RX 2 5 1 3 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 2 2 1 1 1 SRO-I4 I/C 3,6 2,3,4 3,4,5 10 4 4 2 X ,7 ,6 SRO-U MAJ 7 8 7 3 2 2 1 TS 3,4 3,4 4 0 2 2 RO-3 RX 5 1 1 1 0 X NOR SRO-I 1 1 2 1 1 1 I/C I 4,5 2,6,7 2,4 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 7 8 6 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 RO-4 RX 2 1 1 1 0 X NOR SRO-I 1 2 2 1 1 1 I/C 3,4,7 3,5 3,4 7 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 8 6 7 3 2 2 1 TS 0 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-D-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for-RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one 1/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section D.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5 Facility: Peach Bottom Date of Exam: 6/1/2020 Operating Test No.: 2020 NRC A E Scenarios p V 1 2 3 4 T M p E L N CREW CREW POSITION CREW POSITION CREW POSITION 0 I I T POSITION T N I C s A B s A B s A B s A B A M A T R T 0 R T 0 R T 0 R T d L u N y 0 C .P 0 C p 0 C p 0 C p M(*) T p E R I u RO RX 2 2 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I5 X I/C 3,4,5 3,4,7 3,5 9 4 4 2 SRO-U ,6 MAJ 7 8 6 3 2 2 1 TS 3,4,5 3 0 2 2 RX 2 5 2 1 1 0 RO NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I6 I/C 3,6 2,3,4 2,4 8 4 4 2 X ,7 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 7 8 6 3 TS 3,4 2 0 2 2 RO RX 5 2 2 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 2 1 1 1 SRO-I7 X I/C 4,5 2,6,7 2,3,4,5 9 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 7 8 6 3 2 2 1 TS 4(2) 2 0 2 2 RO RX 1 1 0 NOR 1 1 1 SRO-I 'D I/C 4 4 2 SRO-U MAJ 2 2 1 TS 0 2 2 Instructions:

1.

Check the applicant level and enter the operating test number and Form ES-O-1 event numbers for each event type; TS are not applicable for RO applicants. ROs must serve in both the at-the-controls (ATC) and balance-of-plant (BOP) positions. Instant SROs (SRO-I) must serve in both the SRO and the ATC positions, including at least two instrument or component (I/C) malfunctions and one major transient, in the ATC position. If an SRO-I additionally serves in the BOP position, one I/C malfunction can be credited toward the two I/C malfunctions required for the ATC position.

2.

Reactivity manipulations may be conducted under normal or controlled abnormal conditions (refer to Section 0.5.d) but must be significant per Section C.2.a of Appendix D. (*) Reactivity and normal evolutions may be replaced with additional I/C malfunctions on a one-for-one basis.

3.

Whenever practical, both instrument and component malfunctions should be included; only those that require verifiable actions that provide insight to the applicant's competence count toward the minimum requirements specified for the applicant's license level in the right-hand columns.

4.

For new reactor facility licensees that use the ATC operator primarily for monitoring plant parameters, the chief examiner may place SRO-I applicants in either the ATC or BOP position to best evaluate the SRO-I in manipulating plant controls.

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 Facility: Peach Bottom Date of Examination:6/1/2020 Operating Test No.:2020 NRC APPLICANTS RO RO RO1 X RO2 X SRO-I1 X SRO-I2 X SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 lnterpreUDiagnose Events 1-8 1-8 1,5 2,3 1-1-9 1,4 2,5 1,2, 1,3 2,3 2,3 ,6, and Conditions 7,8 ,6, 9' ,5, ,6, 4,6, ,4, ,5, ,4, ,9 7,8 7,8 7,8 8 7,8 6,7 7,8 ,9 ,9 ,8 ,9 Comply with and 1-8 1-8 1,5 2,3 1-1-9 1,4 2,5 1,2, 1,3 2,3 2,3 Use Procedures (1) ,6, ,6, 9 ,5, ,6, 4,6, ,4, ,5, ,4, 7,8 7,8 7,8 7,8 8 7,8 6,7 7,8 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,8 ,9 Operate Control 1,5 2,3 1,4 2,5 1,2, 1,3 2,3 2,3 Boards (2) ,6, ,6, ,5, ,6, 4,6, ,4, ,5, ,4, 7,8 7,8 7,8 7,8 8 7,8 6,7 7,8 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,8 ,9 Communicate 1-8 1-8 1,5 2,3 1-1-9 1,4 2,5 1,2, 1,3 2,3 2,3 and Interact ,6, ,6, 9 ,5, ,6, 4,6, ,4, ,5, ,4, 7,8 7,8 7,8 7,8 8 7,8 6,7 7,8 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,8 ,9 Demonstrate Supervisory 1-8 1-8 1-1-9 Ability (3) 9 Comply with and 3,4 4 3, 3,4 Use TS (3) ,5, (2) 4 Notes: (1) Includes TS compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES 303 1 and ES 303 3 describe the competency rating factors.)

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301~6

  • *_J

~ _ach Bottom Date of Examination:6/1/2020 Operating Test No.:2020 N~".: APPLICANTS RO RO RO3 X RO4 X SRO-I3 X SRO-I4 X SRO-I SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Interpret/Diagnose Events 1-8 1-8 1,5 2,3 1-1-9 1,4 2,5 1,2, 1,3 2,3 2,3 ,6, and Conditions 7,8 ,6, 9 ,5, ,6, 4,6, ,4, ,5, ,4, ,9 7,8 7,8 7,8 8 7,8 6,7 7,8 ,9 ,9 ,8 ,9 Comply with and 1-8 1-8 1,5 2,3 1-1-9 1,4 2,5 1,2, 1,3 2,3 2,3 Use Procedures (1) ,6, ,6, 9 ,5; ,6, 4,6, ,4, ,5, ,4, 7,8 7,8 7,8 7,8 8 7,8 6,7 7,8 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,8 ,9 Operate Control 1,5 2,3 1,4 2,5 1,2, 1,3 2,3 2,3 Boards (2) ,6, ,6, ,5, ,6, 4,6, ,4, ,5, ,4, 7,8 7,8 7,8 7,8 8 7,8 6,7 7,8 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,8 ,9 Communicate 1-8 1-8 1,5 2,3 1-1-9 1,4 2,5 1,2, 1,3 2,3 2,3 and Interact ,6, ,6, 9 ,5, ,6, 4,6, ,4, ,5, ,4, 7,8 7,8 7,8 7,8 8 7,8 6,7 7,8 ,9 ,9 ,9 ,8 ,9 Demonstrate Supervisory 1-8 1-8 1-1-9 Ability (3) 9 Comply with and 3,4 4 3, 3,4 Use TS (3) ,5, (2) 4 Notes: (1) Includes TS compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES 303 1 and ES 303 3 describe the competency rating factors.)

ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6 '.::'_ttom Date of Examination:6/1/2020 Operating Test No.:2020 NRC '"J. APPLICANTS RO RO RO RO SRO-I5 X SRO-I6 X SRO-I7 X SRO-I SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U SRO-U Competencies SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO SCENARIO 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 lnterpreUDiagnose Events 1-8 1,3 2,3 2,3 1-1,2 1,4 2,5 1-8 and Conditions ,4, ,5, ,6, 9 ,4, ,5, ,6, 7,8 6,7 7,8 6,8 7,8 7,8 ,9 ,8 ,9 Comply with and 1-8 1,3 2,3 2,3 1-1,2 1,4 2,5 1-8 Use Procedures (1) ,4, ,5, ,6, 9 ,4, ,5, ,6, 7,8 6,7 7,8 6,8 7,8 7,8 ,9 ,8 ,9 Operate Control 1,3 2,3 2,3 1,2 1,4 2,5 Boards (2) ,4, ,5, -,6, ,4, ,5, ,6, 7,8 6,7 7,8 6,8 7,8 7,8 ,9 ,8 ,9 Communicate 1-8 1,3 2,3 2,3 1-1,2 1,4 2,5 1-8 and Interact ,4, ,5, ,6, 9 ,4, ,5, ,6, 7,8 6,7 7,8 6,8 7,8 7,8 ,9 ,8 ,9 Demonstrate Supervisory 1-8 1-1-8 Ability (3) 9 Comply with and 3,4 3, 4 Use TS (3) ,5, 4 (2) Notes: ( 1) Includes TS compliance for an RO. (2) Optional for an SRO-U. (3) Only applicable to SROs. Instructions: Check the applicants' license type and enter one or more event numbers that will allow the examiners to evaluate every applicable competency for every applicant. (This includes all rating factors for each competency.) (Forms ES 303 1 and ES 303 3 describe the competency rating factors.)

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Quality Checklist Form ES-403-1 Facility: Peach Bottom Date of Exam: 06/11/2020 Exam Level: RO cg:JSRO [{k] Item Description Initials a b C

1.

Clean answer sheets copied before grading r:...r f-1/4_ ~

2.

Proposed answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented (facility reviewer initials not required c/f- µJn.._ rl~ (N/R) if NO post-examination comments are submitted)

3.

Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations) crf-lJ,,.... tr-

4.

Grading for all borderline cases (80% +/-2% overall and 70% or 80%, as applicable, +/-4% on the SRO-only exam) reviewed in c_ rf-tlL... f'f detail

5.

All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades (f are justified er~ UL

6.

Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of C1f-LL. cF questions missed by one-half or more of the applicants Printed Name/Signature ~ Date C£,5/4ffiv--fem,r-~ ~ --- c//s-/;.o2IJ

a. Grader V

v ~

b. Facility Reviewer(*)

L Ml2.'1 "'-£1\\N t,._ 6,..,s -2.-0 ~ C. NRC Chief Examiner (*) T'El'O~ ftSH l--!o-M if~ & (1~/t-0 b-0.J..;-.s.... ~

d. NRC Supervisor (*)

b/1b/Z.t!J 7 (*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.}}

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML21056A220&oldid=3821880"