ML20249B445
| ML20249B445 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 01/04/1996 |
| From: | Dyckman J, Pitts C, White T BOSTON EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20249B442 | List: |
| References | |
| C15.0.3270, C15.0.3270-R, C15.0.3270-R00, NUDOCS 9806230121 | |
| Download: ML20249B445 (24) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 0 Boston Edison CALCULATION COVER SIIEET PILGRIM NUCLEAR POWER STATION lSh 1 of 24 l CALC No C15.0.3270 REV.0 FILE NO . SR @ R-TYPE Subject Fuel Pool Cooline HE E206A & E206B GIP Evaluation NSR O Preliminary Calc. O Finalization Discipline Division Manager: N IT Due Date: _ Approval /s/; lh V
. Date: //9hh
'/
Final Calc. @ Independent Reviewer:,
/S/OMAfM6 5 RYStatementattached @
Page(s) By _LG. Dkk) nan. Date Ch'k'd U /) /. Date Agrpxl '
/S/ / _
/S/ U f
( l . \ This calculation evaluates the Fuel Pool Cooling IIE scismic ddequacy u(san Generic screening methodology, 1.0 Problem Statement 2.0 Summary of Results 3.0 Method of Solution 40 References 5.0 Calculation Generic Implementation Procedure Section 7.4 Evaluation Walkdown Observations Conclusion Attachments: A. Bechtel Calculation 10394-114-C7 (9 sheets) B. Independent Design Verification Record (3 sheets) C. Preliminary Evaluation Checklist (2 sheets) This design analysis DOES O, DOES NOT @ require revision to design docuruents. affected Design Documents: 4FDC IS O ,IS NOT @ Required. A dafety Evaluation IS 0. IS NOT @ Required. l This design analysis DOES O, DOES NOT @ affect the piping analysis index (PAI). If the pal is affected, initiate a ! sevision to Calculation M561. l Minor revisions made on pages of this calculation. See next revision. l Replaces Calc No.: Voided by Calc No.: O Or Attached Memo f NESD 3.05 Rev. (9 JGD/htG5316 9806230121 990615~ PDR ADOCK 05000293 P PDR (
Bostors Edimors CALCULATION SHEET Calculation #: C15.0.3270 ' Revision: 0 Date: 8/95 Prepared by: J.G. Dyckman Sheet 2 of 24 Checked by: W'DjotdfeWu 1.0 PROBLEM STATEMENT SR E NSR 0 A seismic adequacy evaluation is required for the Fuel Pool Cooling Heat Exchanger E-206A and E-206B to address USI A-46 concerns. 2.0
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS The Fuel Pool Cooling Heat Exchangers E-206A and E-206B are outliers because they are flexible and do not have sufHcient capacity to meet the SPA requirement per the screening method, Section 7.4.2 of the Generic Implementation Procedure. Nevertheless, the detailed analyses presented herein shows the Fuel Pool Cooling HE's meet GlP requirements based on computed SA's, and no further action is required. 3.0 MLillOD OF SOLUTION A seismic adequacy evaluation is performed for heat exchangers using the GIP screening methodology of Section 7.4.2. Seismic demand is based on computed spectral accelerations (SA's) which include sensitivity variations (120%) recommended by Ref. 5.
4.0 REFERENCES
- 1. Drawings MI1-22-3, MI1 2-5, C100, C101 and Stress Isometrics 623,624,634-2,635-2,691 and 693
- 2. Generic Implementation Procedure, Rev. 2
- 3. Specification C-Il4
- 4. SEWS for E206A and 206B 5 EPRI NP-5228-SL, Rev.1, Vol. 4 6 BECo Calculation C15.0.1811 JGD/hl/95316 NESD 3.05 Rev.19
n--_ PREPARED BY G .W. U othmn CALC.# C\5 0.%7_7C) CHECKED BY {LI bn(b4c.- REV. O DATE 6 1)b [$$g tSHEET 3 op Sk . 1 4 . ) E[ kaiNh.Nd34-t-A,c-toi) %@yd$(
' w- 1 i
4 I h* D.5T. . . .' l G = 12x\0 _higt
$3 ;
E: 29 m gs 43 _ i _ M 2 hd.o . tj _9.'bE' - - - - - 1 l h co a
-I Q4 .
r H90 0 % 3
- a h/S: 2.
l NB :i l kI....._g.-.-.. bt3 L : 2.12,.h. 1 t:b , 2 d ; S' ' j . N 'l te 1 t
~ ~ ~~~
g a sp.g -
- Comm:2-m verq reiw\\neu\e 6M wd touh) e C E DU _b, nJahedambylet.
i i e m tt h eu 4
'z
& M heave " #MQ l E.zoL A E 3 l J G. M '-6'It IB> A i .a gy q, tb ,! : !l , k, L ,J_E Ii! u u
b l ~17 7 I; i l
^
[] ] hous j
?'-Il lo" j j l g _ _ .
7/g 4 : :l l l f s /., l>p 52, ml - A ,yy , i i I
, n 11'el" A
. [ , e N x wong j 6 EpoG.B i' I
l d' El' l G ' 'l 'l z* Rt@ hth en i lI' '
, <e l
l
, m I l
a kene mLTwb\d 7 -0 l how ver
%proue%s i
_'d l
~
l 'O Treshs ekgonvs. ok, euk thoO
, J r E11H'-9" q prTmMTbc htoq\\ mye$tS&d
' I l
y j\ i
. A-A s I gg,i. 3,, snsws eW
~
__ 1 L
PREPARED BY - d .@. t.ktWAvg Co.Tcd.o.~Rw o S t% m CHECKED BY LA )VNf An . nev. DATE EDfSON o o SHEET OF- IN w l
.-{.p . .j. '
f., j _ }. ! .. .. e . . __7 _ _ . _ 5% (3 2. . -. } . .1_!_L.. _...l _
..i
~
l . U.. _ _ _ L _ [ .. . _ _ l .1- ' I
.E2.0(oA,, !
l
,! !L_ .y .. , .1. l
! ! I ,i .
1: , ENddE6cDi ' y ed \tA6.rA hd [as . 1 1 a t CW %". *MDI.bi/t. peti MEP.. ' :_ l~0se Lb\t: C.!G avhe_ ih
-l ;( CMcMEct.\
9%_
- to.% ; % = 1o.ud. \cN pk \ay 8kdf Abb bw\\t% !
l -
\ R4=,- = .H2
- E 10 G G u ,
l {' 1 Mu' : P% x RLp 5NEph RE - j Ay in g A y #
= 20 %h.92N16, s f. g
- I 6.5? k.
'. _ W1 CT-E '
Ae, 0.%%2LtO[: Bjs 2 ' A.
&., ~
i t Cat2 +D:tc.w e-2ar'(E" auo )1ml N
-p', f eb-=
J 1- I
\'
qg $T T Q -7.Y E StA 26t"7
~ -
q., gg St . m : G.'Sh ki: l0.12. k.0 \31 np3 2 gg :. k T- 4 b _
~
(3'3,000 (2h h) 2150 sea. s po- e aElobA RB = o. cms
. E 10 0 B RQ: 0.H12 steo 4 g _ M b h ('h o i b o t N n h n (.1 % ) (2.5) ( % 6 giosa M l CO P.a- Ps' l
. E to b A RJ: 1.32
. E l o t_. B N: H.15 two 5
- E10G A Po o.O H5GO.ti; ?.15 k v'o : Io.22 k ,
. E '?_0 0 Ib Po .H21 X 6 52: 1.75 k /v: 6.S K mo >=> o m ,0,,m,o ,o mi 2
PREPARED BY d .W. VGt kg n M CALC.# C \ E D. Y l.~l D NO '"""""' g gP ' f*
'~
REv. o DATE 8 u AS FEiiVEDISON ' SHEET 3 OF- 14 , [. ; _4__p.h ..L_ j _,i L- _.. .. _ _i_ ._ . ;_ _ , ._j_ MeeG - j
. d__! . L !
. .i '
.E l _- . . . a _ . . i {
I (d _: .0_t2-(oS f I ' l M_ *.L _ 3.9If O.931 _ Eto4 G j i .
%: N5.& 4%
d 0% =
. P <2.t \; ] ll oo lb
- .. : .l .
% Etof A .
i i g qot. g F, t (NSf t l) b = 2.1%L - i l g- ?[ .59 L k N (lD j 3 , 9 (3
, 1 gg_gp j
= [ bl' ds + N d h y)p =am 1
3Te a 7 E 2.D 6 A E2.oc B ) u h > ;es , m h ; q,gg =, 7,,$ g,
" = I'OO VO k* I* 2' I' Qu = Gu * .1u = ino :).2.i \ y I
@F + F 1 1 STe p B a = % = ?_\2 \b /p13 3 = \?. 4T eent ' ,
F q-ss D = \.ou' t. = ST s c = 10' < S = 12_' t4f-5 2."LS-S L l ~t l b,[ Vo\ 9 k g=. 2.% X \ 05 ]v)p D ~} 'l2. \ % .\ 3 N"2: . j P S-lb E*3-2t sa pX ob@c d 4r Et% A. (Kec.\ km ) ; o s 2m g (teodh emA 04 y u( !
\ce : s sack %% "bx saA\ be a !
i oW\ \ demst ay\bto%n bepnc\ I m 1 h vcA neb e wowene a Mcxvev % \emAwre ens uA\ . m v . a. o s. c. o oru mo ra v>, 3
PREPARED BY d A3 . U 4t k W u n I C. # - - M CHECKED BY Vr f 1A//L
- aEv.
SHEET o b DATE 6 OF 2d tias FEsiVEDISON -oy 2 . ! ! .a . . . .. L _ j . a , - L .. ! .;.
.. 5 Ye! p 3 .) _ I _ l_ E f _. p . _ . .
' ~
!* $addke dMhu[bgutAty
~
3 , h + . i ia v w f s-: 3/ ,, a yqo 6 S I % 2. 8 - 6 3 ! 6 ' l* 4'
- 2. A.: 5.165 Zg_h: ? .at v4
- iI4 e !
l 1 = 2. A :, o , g o i 1 7k
._ T. kin'5)( I +3.05(.5h it .*M.m 3.015) MI l _ = , 6 51 4 316 + , Ys 4 ?.. G H,\1. tom f f .
I
\ \
t K .
= .
h4 h (4.15Y 'M.15 4 + 3ET33 A3 G 3(tugo s)a,11 snes(izuo')
-:. 3 G S X 10 ' b i M p: 1 D -
89,9 l-{g yg sd 2' d .h t / E 1o o A %ne it b u/4'evea3 i hW \ cMbb \cVM- \M C7 Rev, o. (cG%.t c d - L t t. g e. 8 O n t w\ t.h DC Sdp 5y at w VMW \S. \5Y\1 l E 2.0 G B pt.Ath\ GskV\tM[@otaeN-3 I check cetK L ebbmst. rd4Lve. shs Ash 3 (u M W M uo kid
- WI'c h (.65R@'lo)(,1%)
i s Ma = @ Ady 9- O -{.q(n.ss,ncKco (to y g):c7e'* _._ _,_ _ _ y i )
PREPARED BY M bMNL\tMA CE. # 15 all s' CHECKED BY [Af er tviL ,REV. SHEET O 1 DATE b OF 1 L\(as EDISON mz~
$ ~ . . - , . . . . ,. . _ . .m_. ..._._..,,....I..- .. 4 _.
L_p ! i
- - -4 _ - ._R : _ ,._,. . _ iM_
' ' 1 3 o 'K!.'7 2 tJ Q ..i. ;
i a 22.2.5"j_).l--?- i!
.t' 1
_..l. i_ l l ! l2 T ,d D % e. bsT ussa\X l ;.._.__ 1 _ _ L A & s Ss. G l iw w w w i 1c. _ n r o a m w a eeeentt
- n. u i
;I ! vntou.\wk _se#w.n i
;> .i
. , . _ . . - - - - MM ..d 1_W\tY d -
'i i :
15 'k Mio)(12koh 3N5b .thu s w b ess i g e.2 % 4 *= 3.usxe % ! :
^
3g g(3,gg(.33q l A .e > (zz.g
- , 1
- 3.21$o' IQ n
"\) '
q = 21: (
- h h=
sad ; en.s \% aa m-ETeo (O
% naVAscbscA on % pome 9eud es bi e<.tb en rTs4 f or sq ;
Ve<T /wav. L o%v lDb ab k Nfd C %I tNffM E2oo b \%\1 B s 73cH a ffp*[if5 1 Dewwnc\ utec\ew%ns B -ttal s A E lo'lo i Nw(NMd spec 4\ e.4 E206Aktb V'en / %nse. b%l 2. .e 0.H M e n.t3 Hs -to % etoc A to a.o 4 con e. % -20% E2oG B W s%)) H at o 2. H 3 o,%c.7wne
.*u ,wi uco.ro. nw.u.., g
MSPMD @V_A B WVel%V%AR CE. # W<D D CHECKED BY lA// L-nEv. o DATE B 2n 5 gissiiVEDISON yy SHEET b OF 2N ' 7
, L ._ >1L. 1 :. m _.L1 1
1149] tt.J. LDe _j_iC %.,.co _.4, J _L'.1.f if'._ Mije.s {._ (UMo l p ig@l%%\ivphn. 4Ad 1 ~ T _ , I u _ _.a - m7 = \.Mo. l! i '
/>. 2.93(EPA $M.*h_ ,
,'l M n y- 1 i
j _ d L . _ .._ > I _ . l = \. M o c .5 GE_ \5 h -tcho (5% -fuwt N-5 1' : ;
> 0.44 e \%nd,-ta%@%)ske\) E-w i-E2oG B 1 4
R = .\ .9 \- '
.)! 12.H'5 k EPA I je 4%)
< . 1
_ a. _ _ . _.. _ u i h.,@ C Y f. . l
] --' \ .? \ - > b .H4 P., \c\.\%la,-2;il- (H %
i Th
%y rotbm'-).%2f ~Vne Auvv 'ok.
c GT_P capc% 2, p% ee.t \%. ! lSpexh\ 'Perh A ctekeoL= n L.se A3 ctuses %ese couco t
-t5. \oe cs ( % M W sl by c5te 2 seda n vo H.93 % tYs.
le 9-50 A.s G)cv dh coup cA dp.3= L eosTYdc., de% suseeb b Me %\ Ac.te\.erhn CA u%on (s % AT oA %A c3vt99, %4s. ETexkmixhg dtbswh,e_cM O vR \\eT 5 E 7 ob% ca h L cue 4t tep%b\c. -4 perp,er uN c= enor ckend i , GR \.\M * ( S Tc o n s-AA\e s%ues
/V b / = EM E'
^^) = 0.5 63 tJt4
/ (. 2.%n)(1.6nQ16 o ch b'% [5.') bht = 527 (
&W =g.sem(.cn,ma..sa = m &
siz.a in t ato.iooi e o ceo.u mo no vmi 6
- C5E MN cggegg[gy h ((~"
nev. IHEET o one OF I.N EGiiVEDISON gg~~ i.= q., . .ii, ,, ,j -i -e.[to i: T l .. 8. . O CC. b bbt 3 k s, eS1 oftht- o t. l 4 Alic YhdoGDub.y_%_TA.chWnos.2. @ 't @.* , V v' H"{ i hG=; i
. g :_9. 9on .sc =.2Widl- - .
/
. Il'.
Co,mdeTe outsN enseJe cohn base.1
\M w I :
S L6o_As V ! aM, B. cWde.
- i g,
_4__.1. .e.3go.Ay_.W.e%eevsm%, ed \6) ;
' @ ki iM2 lb I(o0N6 S D' Y
/ *
- The%usag" noT coa nentbe m&\\el g ,
=
f ecause d we 9eaesTa\ der- e g gerence. oar spr u \comTuc-rien, sTA cave,y>e<t w m- @ U> x stA\eck h 9 ef eA*E C % g 9 Fred notes mchdTe bsep5Tq A i'i6'J2 0 N N< b\h nYt 3lf 4) Ar04td ^ n".. s P aH 9 mA per h13 t- \ n. T = %T2 tb q,9,g Tk c is > u p \ M (L @ b 5tc N 3 t : . 9_h. ' The qASt W<d e O 64Te. is dkh1 top $
& a %eAcd n A ov4p<td b( Ji<4 9b\\.9 6 e \\ .' o_ 1 ._
Coccbsh
%e Tve\ h\ coo \gME's E2ccA ordn racG3 exeW ,
6%duM\ g elegde bc be h \tt c2 as co W ev3 cWd bu3 tocT
%c
\occcu cvne se.quwe3 % e c>weds e u&At o cn n 4 m eet h 59A <4.. % %M At%A Wo. sea e %
g Aembt % s.3 \tu g%g.levdx
, wgps, .sordghns s-geGT.s s h cqd.3 '
sw )
~~
petO. toot B L Co. f OHM 3150 HLV. 67J1 a
CALCULATION COVER SHEET _T m eg. _ __ _m <m y ., voc /03 l<- su.xCT (NIAJ s n..A , n .1 Al A.+ e. , k ee, - a rite NO. Il 4- - C"7 j b ucood fro , . Ana} u t it CALC. NO.
,, a i NO. OF SHEETS l
RECORD OF ISSUES DATE CHKD DATE APPRD DATE NO. DESCR;PTION SY
, YMat b h, V es\ *0 V WO bS fh Of8h (({
W$)' Zfg
/\ __
A A A A
^
s+ 6 ,.3 .4 Abw: s.. a.# 1 l A%ed A Cis.o .ulo ( R A _,, J "2-Sr. sk.J 2 (
9 CALCULATION SHEET -) S IpT cAtc. NO. Il 4 - C"I REV.NO. O ORlGINATOR
- k. bA, b OATE ll,/1B IBE CHECKED *pATE N Ib U
fil acim 1 JOB NO. lb394 - ll4 rmOJECT SHEET NO. I SUBJECT 1 Tnh educkon 2 A oct3 w ) analy s pericm.A in c lculab im - c1 A.o 3 4 Shoujcd kk Ot M-huj\f- heh & C.b4 63C r (umt was e inade3=+c.. CaicJsb 11+ - ca,b. o Jm3n,J a A h.&
~iuaos La s aL wa ,, s,. Oset 9
10 C Gkt u l o.bo% IIk - CL, Mt us t his cak tu,k Ahog l1 12 h thw Oa.k & /riocli < cl rame h sbthm1lg 13 b t- . b anA Aia bL (med 14 ALC.t 'gtAthC ta.> i Ik f tI s( om N meada a Som to J oh<-c +k <. new fre qu,~3 J-se m. .s3sw. m em .<< eiu A.e an A be mea A a~ imb & med,d .J drome it deutball 3 a u ef MI'- 21 32 N eguent tullI k (cruerda IVC C GlC ula ed M V barv) l 23 34 i 25 me.bodt b dt. e rmine. Nt (Acce f r m i. k a b kup (bcA se 37 o, Com e rega m a vm l$5 s wijk also he. f rvd, %est fr
- mehA mui a m.a % a<h<m ,me mbu ea na A bm vis s comp.4u anslat 3 b ddum% .shubral 32 33 ( AC<c abil . Thrs u)\ bc rmed 6 d Oui a nal3sts {ce 2
35 eg}culahim and in calc o,} ah,*og ll 4 - G , kt o, ) 3e
_- _ --_ _ _- __ ___ _ J _ ___ CALCULATION SHEET II k
- C7 SIg#,py CALC. NO. CEV NO. O ORIGIN ATOR - bMu C y
DATE \1,1b,l61 CHECKED DATE
,N /83 ID 39 k ~ 114
( PR$ JECT SUBJECT t n e fe. 4 I JOB NO. SHEET NO- 1 Refru eue i t) Bech h1 Calculahfon 10 3% - 114 - C 2. , Rev. O l " t3 , Reu.O t) i 4 Forenwlu kr .strui ad .54raiw , Roar k P EJi b
+) Pd g ,m Sb , LAn;f i f<ub Ib2 3 Rye C=va, Ay4 IW 2 s) Atst Manot .S .sbl Ce,n h uc k , 1" & B" Edib 3
o 4Speddw C- B6, Ret o (. SEC. En) p) '///[83 is( -) E.c4 \ lo s e - sk. -c - 119 o , Rev. o Otavn S 17 18 a) Compk a fnym Oak pt, CE600 to (dcAL lose - Iw -c 7 A , R eo. o (Fngus$ bip d 2o
-n C 7 8 , R4 v. o (Fr.u An ip.s )
ai 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 1 31 32 E 33
- 3'
' 35 1 36 t - y een --ren. s -a l
1
1 CALCULATION SHEET -) ; CALC.NO. Ilk" C REV,NO. O 9 ORIGIN ATOR . - .e DATE 11!1"7!8 3 CHECKED ~6 ATE 8 3 PROJECT b! eu JOS NO. /DR9 4 - Il 4
$UBJECT $HEET NO- b 0
D fce n u e neu h\ gs ri s - 0 o As clewt W k cill be. caleu}aded 1(At s ih 6 Me 7 di rec.bo w. be corueyvabws k .J o rnt accel 4rab*ug O Soutini] 9 0 UI! b MfCI , in he. [- W direchog , rgg 4, s{ k
) l c ui C4 3= g y 4 Cc ,
IP /o" 13 ' 17 '1B whggg k _ 2,4 E.I E= 2A s / o' ps ; 9 s (1.k' ~ W \ .) S. S ie 1 s
- a, ,1 . -
x
- 21 ,,{ , 3 6 rn 22 23 h + (2.4 2.9 s i b )(S 56 i t) .
9, g"f 6 A / b+ #/36 24 ()1A MUbib' - (#U(\t t ?) as rys s 4400 Z poiw k _
- S. bi ~," ( 3E t. Ne . I, l er 4)( i h3 26 ,
27 186. 9 Y.se s g 28 29 : I i. 2d'7 4 ' / D b , 2.,0 . 3 b 2. so 2.~rr I.69 "-7 , 33 l 33 ( u . 35 36
p f CALCULATIONcau:. SHEETNO. II k * ( l d REV.NO. O
/2!28!8)
I ORIGINATOR - {tA C DATE 12_/tB/ 63 CHECKED " ATE - a i < i m y _1 ,e m - ii s [ m,EC1 SUBJECT SHEET NO- k l Au- h a l J- % . l..J wa) h. 4r.ndw.d b A . colsmn lxAa med .1 -A .s y , 4 o g ,s l v .
"~ K 3EIJ .R st.,
4 e a' k' I = s o . s ,,+ 6
- 19x/o' p; A
- 2.4. f 3, VJLsir.5 ^m .
51.S h * .5 7. S i, . f n n, u%io'ph o u.y a. 3 , io s, z o s
-( C 2.3. c ..)2 (sv r ,-)*
a.,. m= 5.69 c~ l
.9
-] -
\ , los,w % .
1 1,9 s h 1
- 2. % r.Ls"Y ,
?
) he 3 by nr ' I -
1 J4. 9 , 3
\ __ \
f* 3 (asa) ( zi.s r a)' 9 ;. D D 2_o '[. rs n3t. fl. 92 he 0 -- I'7. 8 B h w Um$ s N k l E s( D5 EG
._ __________________a
Npt CALCULATION SHEET d O CALC.NO. UM~(l R EV. NO. ORIGINATOR .e DATE 11. l1A f lL1 CHECKED " BATE N ' 83 I mueCT Pd yw Y m. NO. so244 - n +
$UIJECT SHEET NO 8 Ae, lee b d FJ. W- 3 " ..
.M Hocia.Al : OBE 2.% dagi3 0.30 3 T-- yunnt j l
S i E 5 7.' Jaytag o.43 3 Ab Verhal = c.or$
%nn ..
Wkcol & ce. af + poinh = G.1*/p,,d)().osg ) /. /6 k E-W kia.onk1 J 4 p;d O.) t/p,J)(,so3) : o, s'a k N-s &imbi a+ 2. pid = (2.2. A/p J)(. SQ , 0.66 k u.+< : ce so, asa coyA p,.y.m oapa. Gm + - n 4 - c, A, o o) 9 3navnic ahcLkgdi fan (n.dC.! 6 ) went} 3 3 h NX su sd (ame showed h regg,ecj k a 9 be. JS. / 5 he wMEh to am Utg W(.ll udh h J D hd c e4ltu} ahed Va!st o I t. % ht . Nest et s 2.0Yo ragt, vakwe o ll. 9 2. h & Oc 0 dm3 h s EI g cce,} cf gh'% Oalues med huun an_ untuo ivt . r - 's 3
t CALCULATION SHEET d calc. No. 11 + - C7 REv. No. O ORIGINATOR k b) r OATE 12./2.B/ Bt CHECKED 6,=, g M-!28'[$3
!D M k'IM-( rnOJECT
$UBJECT bI eh I JOB NO.
SHEET NO. S
?
2 N ~- bly's ( F.c N-5 scu mes Qre bh onl3 ) 3 4 (%p'hr MCdt\ 'c b .I or}~ 13 em. boad umb'in&% 5 6 h he/i%o d'S dir (c. og plu V4fhcAI loa ds . 7 (6,U.O-t0) A .3 tdcA lo to p __ _ B 33
- o. W o.66t 12 @
13 g @ @ 83 14 i y
ll?
l.)@ 16 ( b , 17 18 to g M M > T' 20 s 31 9 Z 22 _L.JN C 6 A_ ~ Noh: N ck 1 is .A w ~ d A bt. pinnJ . 23
.) 0L4 o8E A Lok Reld v><b inhohus a.
3 2a ne3I eddk b4i.$ is membe D. ' 2s Q DL
- 55E. h 1.5 b Set cJt. l a - (_ G k< dJ 3 2s (nd.
27 2e Gn ,u<<. T .1 . A '. 29 oBE
- 6.3 3 , 1.55 - 0.433 30 1.3 31 i) 3 ' l. o fs.
32 33 u f 2.) 1.43 3 = /. s k or 0.1f 3'l0b 35 "I}w we e ggh'on 1) goott n3 b < va) tr a % 3e
$5 CALC.NO. Uk*b'I REV.NO. O oniciNATon R Uk DATE 4,/2.6,f %"I CHECKED 'DATE I
( PROJECT SUBJECT bdj ei- I _ JOS NO. SHEET NO-10M + -11 + 7
)
!1 2 d< d NI- LA ( 16.1814 - ll A - C l 8, Rv. 0) 3 r
- a Mmbeu lo.A an,
,a kip arJ Rip-i. (. loc.) toordied .43sh)
- 5 T Ms !
e Gew N. . Avi.) $
+
V,
+ +
M_y 7 @ 1. M i a O l. M o. 2.0 -& + e li. M O . llo 0.% 4 4 & l l , '2A l g 10 h O.53 + + + + -O- 1 it h -& D. 66 l. IL + ir.oS 8.rB 12 h * '& 4 4 I S.09; 8,5'B
- 13 h -O- , 0. b b l.16 + Js,oS B.C8 10 10 16 f $ d fo,nh _ /egyg ag e, ;n k, , gy g, , g, ( gg{ (nocy[n,( ,g jhgg) 1/ .
18 N4 tJ. Fs F~ F. M, A I h to 2. -G- 2.+1 e- + + -*- 20 4 1.41 0. 2.0 4 + +
-l 31 9 -G- 1. (. A- O.46 G- & 22 23 24 Calc.ula Ilk "b2 3 b. O Lul al\ members k ht 2s 26 . .Tdrall adeguak O c.e k MT 14 er.h a lc 27 28 ( vhemhtes @,h h ja k tem t- ana lu
- if, , agd k a frj 2.
30 cong,qh y dojes 3 ad 6, in k com 4c ana yig). 31 32 b, e o h an ad ik cowh%s MO k 2' (
- 2. o,am.a <s % E.uat. ou A oa -, < 6 35 36 o r e. adequa C pf f OiNS o na its.
es[t; CALCULATION SHEET - cuc. ~o. ii + - c , av. ~o. o
.;-,. e. wa.
u
. ,, a, .1 a c - ,. so ..,, n w n ,
( m o, cr p;i g:_ i .,0. uo. im+ - ii + SUBJECT SHEET NO- 6 1 2 Som b, h ,b / Y % k"
- 2.,
3 2 g l
}
o %j o.66 k p s W ' l. l6 A m = /s. o s x - .,
. y 7 Ma= 9.SbA in / )
8 9 A ,' 3.~I5 in' 10 11 IV
- I-}b k s D. b 1 hai Wr amal) Ok b im chion 12 3* I le 2. J 13 13 by
- b 8
/. il inE [f * .(g a 8 8b i=* j. % g.,
- k. ') l h3 16 7 b5 ki '$
16 - jf. 08 k-ta J.9 l int * .5"* ll Ok tha et. io's 17 l 18 k ,. ( l 5. 06 k , , B.S 6 A -i+ +1I in * '
- 5. 0 2. k.2 ,
19 20
$upcok habe it a e o u e o.u 21 22 ; 23 C6nu ck'ow ah Node 1 23 25 Yo t<t
- l. / 6 I4 ; \It.<t s = 0.66 (
26 27 1- 4 f hIb 28 29 Star ti * (Nbh 4 b ' 6.6 k [tatu mt a g It 307 $clb 30 31 6. b K > h.) 6 L7 , (0.bb k[ : I.34 ! 22 as (
.. %k 3 c onnetb. is .Aeoyd u r as as
)' EAl.CULATION SHEET V calc.NO. Il 4 ' C ~I REV. NO. D ORIGINATOR k- Idub DATE IL/ 2_b f &l CHECKED I 'DATE
- 8)
Q I E en2 JECT bt\jc h I JOB NO. /039 4 - ll4
$UBJECT SHEET NO- S Cemhh a+ N6Jt 6 Ts ts o My s o o.6G k M a, :. O V)
W 1. I b A
- 2. 34' / h,lh (b. A 3o 1 b lh ) '
8.t k ske.se e u$ $ WAn.1 or o.L 8. B k > l.16 k ? o k. S 6 aod\ Dir,d m '. Tb ho/ mbi i slob vbe.k ca u, d N week lmk hex. b<- <n.Adel at . Lw n
/ cm %khi aca3 m9 4 - s x -c- 1390, A. o. B 3 hspebr.e 4bt %J:kitabh h Mrue. ball $olegudt b h con .E b m il lo J.
t } } } J 7 Mc%he b od Node 1 J D - Tke shcu N d aNequae3 a ma.l y L s r ,s r me hr & 3 0 ad node l art coverec} in (= I c ulak'on JI4-C3,dev. I B i 9( a e 3 3
Calcuttion C15.0.3270 Attachment B Page.l. of 3_ INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION RECORD (IDVR) I. Instructions to inQendent personnel Design Documents C15.0.3270 0 fuel Pool Coolina HE E206A & B (Document No.) (Rev.) (Document Title) Design verification should be done in accordance with ANSI N45.2.ll, Section 6, as amended by Reg. Guide 1.64, Rcv.1. Verification Methods to be used; Document (s)"Q" Level:
$ Design review @ Q O Alternate or simplified calculations O FF-Q O Qualification Testins- 0 Non-Q Special Instructions m h- I O& ff Div. 51anager V Date # #
- 11. Verification Documentation:
Methods Used:
@ Design review (attach any documentation)
O Alternate or simplified calculations (attach calculations) O Qualification Testing (attach Test Report) Design Document Acceptable: YES E No O l If not acceptable, .3 c reasons or provide comments on Exhibit 3.06-B. In ependen Design Verif c ck com ! cted
! b
~
independent Reviewer Datd Acknowledgement of verifi:ation: ' I~ .
/ d ivision Manager U Date ' /
111. Resolution of conunents: Conunents resolved (See Exhibit 3.06-b): f{__ lD I Cognizan Engineer Date
\
Action taken makes design document acceptable rL L r
~
Pds Independent Reviewer ahnks
' Date Exhibit 3.06-A Rev. 7 JGD%Lm316
Calculation _C15.0.32 70 Attachment B Pr:ge,2, of 3_ O so roaed'=aa oESioN REVIEW CHECKLIST
~
YES NO N/A
- 1. Where design in puts correctly selected and incorporated @
into the design d ocument?
- 2. Are assumptions necessary to perform the design adequately described and reasonable? Where necessary, are the E
assumptions identified for subsequent re-verifications when the detailed design activities are completed?
- 3. Are the appropriate quality assurance requirements specified? @
- 4. Are the applicable codes, standards and regulatory M requirements including issues and addenda properly identified and are their design requirements met?
- 5. Has applicable constmetion and operating experience been considered?
Q
- 6. Has design interfacu with other functional units @
requirements been utilized?
- 7. Was an appropriate design method used? E j
- 8. Is the design document reasonable compared to the design @
input?
- 9. ! re the specified parts, egapment and processes suitable O O m for the required application?
- 10. Are the specified materials compatible with each other and the design environmental conditions to which the material O E will be exposed?
'l1. Have adequate suaintenance features and requirements been @
specified?
- 12. Are accessibility and other design provisions adequate @
for performance of needed maintenance and repair?
- 13. Has adequate accessibility been provided to perform the in-service inspection expected to be required during plant lifetime?
I L Has the design properly considered radiation exposure to the public and plant personnel? Have ALARA considerations O E been addressed?
- 15. Are the acceptance criteria incorporated in the design documents sufficient to allow verification that design requirements have been satishetorily accomplished?
- 16. Have sufficient installation details and/or instructions, %
including specification of applicable special processes, been included in the design output? Exhibit 3.06-B Rev. 7 samumis 1 j
Cdculation C15.0.3270 Attachment B Page.3. cf 3_ h Bostors Edisora DESIGN REVIEW CHECKLIST (Continued) YES NO N/A !
- 17. Have adequate pre-operational and subsequent periodic test O @
requirements specified (including 1st)?
- 18. Are adequate handling, storage, cleaning and shipping requirements specified?
S I
- 19. Are adequate identification requirements specified? @
l 20. Are requirements for record preparation review, approval, retention, etc. adequately specified? O B l 21 Have all of the potentially applicable design considerations @ l been correctly evaluated for applicability to the specific l' case and have the a aplicable considerations been correctly i a.1d completely dea t witi.') l i
- 22. Have the problems with this design, known from prior applications, been considered and resolved?
@ O l'
- 23. Have relevant design basis documents such as Design .@
. Specifications, FSAR, Tech. Specs., and the Fire Protection
. Review Report been researched and referenced in the design inputs and safety evaluation?
- 24. For modifications to existing components, check that the original manufacturers estimated impact on the existing O E components that will be modified is included, or a statement indicating why tSe information could not be obtained, or was not necesary to be obtained.
l
- 25. Are the Section 's'I Repair / Replacement Plant Requirements O @ l specified (refer to NOP 83El, Nuclear Engineering i Department Work Instruction 409, or Exhibit 3.02-BB). !
COMMENTS RESOLUTION MINM. CO M M u/Tb tutoGP;M T7r 0 INTD VAboas CALC SG(not).$, l Submitted ,I /2!2")/hE Resolved Date Date i i Exhibit 3.o6-B Rev. 7 I kid'hkM5316
Calculati:n C15.03270 i Attachment C l Page l. of 2 _ ! RTYPE A9.02 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION CHECKLIST I t 1. IDENTIFICATION: Document Number: C15.0.3270 Revision 0 l l Fuel Pool Cooling HE E-206A & B GIP Evaluation - t l
- 2. CLASSIFICATION:
Yes No a. Does the proposed change involve Q listed equipment? O Yes O No b. For a new procedure, Temporary Procedure, or major revision; does the Procedure contain procedural steps or requirements in the FSAR? If yes, identify FSAR sections. N/A
- Oyes %No c. Is this a new procedure or Temporary Procedure that is Fire Protection Program related or a major revision that makes an existing procedure l . Fire Protection Program related?
NIA l l 3. PRELIMINARY EVALUATION: l O Yes @ No a. Would this modify piant characteristics or procedural steps described j in the FSAR7 If yes, identify section: t O Yes @ No b. Does this affect the design of systems, structures or components l described in the FSAR? O Yes @ No c. Does this af'- :t the function of systems, structures or components . described in the FSAR7 ) O Yes- @ No d. Does this affect the method of performing the function of systems, structures or components described in the FSAR7
. O Yes @ No e. Does this indirectly affect the capability of safety related systems, structures or components Cscribed in the FSAR to perform their functions?
1 , O Yes @ No f. Does this create a new test not described in the FSAR that could ) affect plant safety? Exhibit 4 l t NOP83E5 Rev. 7 I Janw953is l l
Calculation C15.0.3270 Attachment C Page.2. of 2 _ PRELIMINARY EVALUATION CHECKLIST (Continued) O Yes @ No ' g. Would this change modify assumptions used in the accident analyses described in FSAR Chapter 147 If yes, identify sections: 0 Yes @ No h. Does this change affect the ability of a system required to achieve and maintain safe shutdown in an event of a fire? O Yes @ No I. Does this change affect a requirement of, or niajor commitment to, 10CFR50 Appendix R7 0 Yes @ No J. Does thit c' hange affect a requirement of IE Clicular 80-18 (for Radioactive Waste Systems)? O Yes @ No k. Could this affect the function of systems or components required for compliance with the Limiting Conditions for Operation in the Technical Specifications? O Yes @ No I. In the judgment of the evaluator, is a Safety Evaluation required? If the answer to any questions in Part 3 is "Yes", then a Safety Evaluation is required prior to implementation. Check the appropriate block and provide any explanatory comments below; i
- 4. SAFETY EVALUATION RE IRED 7 0 Yes No s
- 5. PREPARED BY: iA / Principal Enaineer DATE: 8/10/95
' " '/ Title APPROVED BY ,
' Civil DM DATE: /kfD Title /
l Exhibit 4 NOP83E5 Rev. 7 JGDM/95316 j}}