ML20248A603
| ML20248A603 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 08/02/1989 |
| From: | Gallo R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Creel G BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20248A608 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8908080346 | |
| Download: ML20248A603 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000317/1989080
Text
, , , , - - - _ _ _ _
.,
.
o
[r uog%
e
UNITED STATES
f
f%
$
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
l
,j l
j
REGION l
l
p
475 ALLENDALE ROAD
!
KING Oc .# RUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406
.....
Docket Nos. 50-317
-
1
50-318
l
l
Baltimore Gas & Electric Company
{
ATTN:
Mr. George C.
Creel
Vice President-Nuclear Energy
Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant
j
MD Rts 2 & 4
P. 6. Box 1535
l
Lusby, Maryland
20657
{
i
Gentlemen:
>
SUBJECT:
INSPECTION NOS. 50-317/39-80 AND 50-318/89-80
l
During the period of May 15 through May 25, 1989, the NRC
I
conducted an inspection of the Emergency Operating Procedures at
j
the Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2.
l
l
At the conclusion of the inspection, the preliminary findings
were discussed with those members of your staff identified in the
i
enclosed report.
Within the context of this report, the term
Emergency Operating Procedures includes the EOPs, AOPs, and any
procedure referenced within the EOPs and/or AOPs.
)
l
During the inspection, two concerns were identified as. potential
'
restart issues.
These concerns are (1) the philosophy that the
EOPs were to be used as a guideline vice verbatim procedural
compliance, and (2) the adequacy of the flowchart in EOP-0 used
to determine which of the EOPs should be entered to mitigate the
event (paragraphs 2.0 and 4.3.a of the enclosed inspection
report, respectively).
You are requested to respond, in writing, to the above concerns
within thirty days of receipt of this letter identifying those
actions taken r; planned.
Your response should contain the
specifics of how the changes will be made, and a schedule of when
the changes will be implemented, including training on the
changes.
As discussed in paragraph 9.0 of the enclosed
inspection report, we understand that the response to the two
concerns will be provided to the NRC prior to restart of either
unit.
In addition, Attachment 4 to the enclosed inspection report
identifies several other weaknesses relative to implementation of
the EOPs.
You are requested to respond to the identified
weaknesses within sixty days of receipt of this latter.
890808034k$$0 bob 17
sDOC
k
\\ '{H
I
- - _ - -
d
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
-
..
.
e
i
s
e
Baltimore Gas & Electric Company 2
The responses requested by this letter are not subject to the
clearance procedures of the Office of Management and Budget as
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL 96-511.
In accordance with 10CFR2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a
copy of this letter and its enclosure will be placed in the NRC
Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions regarding the commitments
identified in this letter or the enclosed report, please contact
me.
Sincerely,
Crigiral Signod Byi
Robert M. Gallo, Chief
Operations Branch
Division of Reactor Safety
Enclosure:
Inspection Report Nos. 50-317/89-80 and 50-318/89-80
w/ Attachments 1,
2,
3,
and 4
,
1
cc w/ enclosure and attachments 1,
2,
3,
and 4:
l
L. Russell, Manager, Nuclear Power Department
K. Nietman, General Supervisor Nuclear Training
Senior Resident Inspector
Public Document Room (PDR)
Local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
l
State of Maryland (2)
bec w/ enclosure and attachments 1,
2,
3,
and 4:
P. W. Eselgroth, Chief, PWR, DRS
B.
G.
W. Lapinsky, NRR
bec w/ enclosure but w/o attachments:
S.
B.
Sun, NRR
Region I Docket Room (w/ concurrences)
D.
T.
E. Yachimiak, DRS
"
A.
B.
Sutthoff, SAZC
DRS Files (2)
L. J.
Defferding, PNL
R.
D. Warner, PNL
occ U/o encl. or attchnts.
Qd
l'anagement Assistant, DRMA
fv
Norris
Es -
th
D
f
q r
o
RI/DRS
R'
'
$
RI/DRS
07/ 3 /89
07/f7/89
0
89