ML20247F079
| ML20247F079 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | North Anna  |
| Issue date: | 03/23/1989 |
| From: | Cunningham A, Rankin W NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20247F077 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-338-89-02, 50-338-89-2, 50-339-89-02, 50-339-89-2, NUDOCS 8904030306 | |
| Download: ML20247F079 (13) | |
See also: IR 05000338/1989002
Text
.
_
_
.._
_ _ _ . . _ . .
._
_
. . _ _ . .
w>
y;
'
sa hra
s
L'
T?
4
UNITED STATES
j
[
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,
g ,
.% e,go -f[.
, . REGION ll
- o,
101 MAnlETTA ST., N.W.
.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
-
-
D 24 MS
s
Report Nos.:
50-338/89-02.and 50-339/89-02
,
9
.
Virginia Electric and Power Company'
,
Licensee:
'
-Docket Nos.:
50-338 and 50-339
License Nos.: -NPF-4 and NPF-7
.
Facility Name: North' Anne.1'and 2
'
>
nm
C
Inspection Cond t'di/ February
23', 1989
7
y
-
'
/J 2,3 -89
r
. Inspector:
-/. .
i _. .
_
C
A. L..Cunningham f 7 -
Date. Sign 6d
. Accompanying Personnel:
G. F. Martin
!-
Approved By:M@'
03 -2 3- f9
'
'W. H. Rankin',. Chief
Date Signed
,
Emergency Preparedness Section
' Emergency. Preparedness and Radiation Protection
,
' Branch-
Division of Radiation Safety and Safeguards
SUMMARY
.
Scope
-This special, announced inspection was the initial followup on Emergency
Response Facility . Appraisal (ERFA) findings identified during the ERFA
conducted June l27-30, 1988 (50-338, 339/88-14).
Inspection included a detailed
l
review, evaluation, and discussion of the licensee's response to the ERFA open
l
-1tems and Emergency Preparedness Program enhancement items.
A review of all
l.
outstanding- nonapprai. sal emergency preparedness findings and the corrective
p
actions implemented in response thereto was performed (Paragraph 4).
,
Results-
A detailed review, evaluation, and discussion of the licensee's current ERFA
Action Plan disclosed that corrective actions- for only two ERFA open items
(88-14-05,88-14-07) were satisfactorily completed (Paragraph 2).
It was also
disclosed that corrective actions for the major open items and related Emergency
Preparedness Program enhancement items addressing dose assessment / projection,
-and their respective computerized and manual calculational methods, were not
implemented (88-14-01,.88-14-02, 88-14-03, G8-14-04). The projected corrective
a'ction completion date of July 31, 1989, was assigned for these items.
The
apparent significant delay in implementing prompt corrective action in response
to :the appraisal findings was fully discussed with cognizant licensee
representatives prior to and during the exit interview (Paragraph 5).
L,
gRO4030306 890323
N
ADOCK 0500033a[?
q
PNU
-
_ _ _ - - _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
I
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
.
.
-
.
j
Evaluation of three additional Emergency Preparedness items unrelated to the
appraisal, disclosed that acceptable corrective actions were completed for the
violation addressing use of an updated emergency response personnel
augmentation telephone list (50-338, 339/88-24-01), and an IFl regarding
Emergency Preparedness drill critique reports (f.-' 338, 339/88-24-03).
The
third item (50-338, 339/88-24-02), which involved a violation regarding
staffing requirements for Emergency Response Team personnel, remained open
pending an NRC review and assessment of a licensee proposed Emergency Plan
Revision addressing this subject (Paragraph 4),
i
-
-
. - - .
. _ _ _ _ _ _
-
______
-
m
,
[.
-
,
.
,
5
>
'6
L
REPORT DETAILS
1.
. Persons Contacted-
,
Licensee Employees
M. Bowling, Assistant-Station Manager
- RT Enfinger, Assistant Manager,.0perations and Maintenance
'*S. Harrison, Corporate Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
- P..Kemp, Licensing Supervisor
- J.2Lebester,' Licensing Engineer
- B. McBride, Station Emergency Preparedness Coordinator
D. Smith, Engineer
C. Tarantino, . Corporate Health Physicist
- F. Terminella, Quality Assurance Supervisor
NRC Resident Inspector
- J. Caldwell-
- Attended exit interview
2.
Licensee Action on ERF~ Appraisal Open Items (92701)
This section addresses the status of the licensee's response to ERFA Open
Items identified during the ERF Appraisal performed June 27-30, 1988
(50-338,339/88-14). Note that prompt corrective action was not completed
for those items addressing dose assessment / projection (88-14-01, 88-14-02,
88-14-03, 88-14-04).
Inspection disclosed that the licensee's Appraisal-
Action plan, dated November 21, 1988, extended the projected corrective
action completion date for these items from January / February 1,1989
to July 31, 1989.
Based on this projection, the total elapsed time
between identification of the subject items and projected completion of
correction of same will approach 13 months. The subject delay represents
a significant departure from expected prompt implementation and completion
of effective corrective actions.
The subject open items and related
Emergency Preparedness Program enhancement items were fully discussed with
cognizant licensee representatives prior to and during the inspection exit
interview.
All referenced items will remain open pending acceptable
'-
resolution.
m
a.
(0 pen) ERFA Open Item S0-338, 339/88-14-01:
Completion of resolution
of differences in dose calculations between the RAD / MET Model and
manual method defined in the Emergency Plan Implementing Procedures
(EPIPs).
Inspection disclosed that software changes to the RAD / MET model
(Class A Dose Assessment Model) necessary to resolve differences
between the manual EPIP method and the computerized RAD / MET model
were submitted to tha licensee's Power Engineering Services on
December 21, 1988.
The respective memorandum indicated that
approximately six weeks would be recessary to implement, document and
test the necessary changes.
The referenced Appraisal Action Plan
-_:___ ___-______________________-- _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ m
_
-
.
---
L.
-
.
'2
e
reassigned a corrective action completion date of July 31, 1989.
This item remains open until a satisfactory corrective action is
completed.
b.
(0 pen) ERFA Open Item 50-338, 339/88-14-02:
Completion of evaluation
of validity of use of field monitoring data for calculating a source
term and use of same in the protective action decision process, or in
determining emergency classifications (50-338, 339/88-14-02).
Based on the recognized non-conservative calculation methodology
involved, the licensee deleted this capability from the RADMET model
and EPIP-4.13 (Offsite Release Assessment with Environmental Data).
The changes will be coordinated with a major revision to the manual
calculation procedures, and the RADMET computer code. The projected
completion date for proposed corrective action was July 31, 1989,
c.
(0 pen) ERFA Open Item 50-338, 339/88-14-03:
Completion of revision
to the EPIPs addressing dose assessment to i vlude separate stability-
classes for vertical and horizontal diffusion.
Inspection disclosed that the licensee will revise EPIP-4.10
(Determination of X/Q) to include the Pasquill-Gifford-Turner
stability class tables in lieu of implementing a system of separate
stability classes for vertical and horizontal diffusion. This change
> ss planned to be implemented concurrent with the above cited major
/ision of the manual dose calculation procedurec.
The Appraisal
...: tion Plan listed a completion date of July 31, 1989.
Inspection
disc 1csed, however, that existing methodologies presently used by the
licensee are consistent with NRC regulations and guidance.
This item will remain open until the committed procedural changes
have been implemented and determined to be adequate.
d.
(0 pen) ERFA Open Item 50-338, 339/88-14-04:
Completion of
modification of the RADMET model to provide dose projection estimates
at future plume positions.
Inspection disclosed that the licensee planned a modification to the
RADMET Computer Model to provide dose projection estimates as one of
the code enhancements.
This modification will be made concurrent
with the previously referenced computer code changes. The projected
completion date of July 31, 1989 was assigned,
e.
(Closed) ERFA Open Item 50-338, 339/88-14-05: Completion of revision
of TSC ventilation operation procedure (1-0P-21-10) to include
operator verification or normal system damper positions to ensure
proper system operation.
Ins;+.' tion disclosed that revisions incorporating the indicated
chegas to procedure 1-0P-21-10 were completed and approved as
_ _ ______
_ _ _ . _ _ _ _ __
.-
2
_
__ _
. _ _ _
4
.
.
3
'
.
Revision 2 dated January 12, 1989.
The procedure was considered
. adequate.
f.
(0 pen) ERFA Open Item 50-338, 339/88-14-06:
Completion of revision
of TSC ventilation test prucedure (1-PT-77.9) to test system
components, including system interlocks.
Inspection disclosed that the licensee determined that the electrical
schematics of the TSC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning
(HVAC) system were inaccurate.
Correction of this item was
reassigned to the Station Design Engineering Department ' for
assessment and resolution.
Following correction of the schematics
(scheduled for completion during March 1989), the licensee committed
to revise the test procedure and initiate tests of the system
interlocks and remote indicators.
g.
(Closed) ERFA Open Item 50-338, 339/88-14-07:
Completion of
establishment of a mechanism to track all sensor data errors and
assist in correction and prevention of such errors.
I
Inspection disclosed that the ERF computer system used an ERF
database program to track all system problems.
The database was
expanded to include tracking of SPDS sensor data errors.
Additionally, the ERF Computer System Coordinator is responsible for
tracking the progress of corrective actions addressing sensor data
errors and ensuring that they are entered into the database following
resolution of same.
The system generated reports to determine
problem areas and to establish specific trends.
Response to this
item was determined to be adequate and complete.
L
Status Review of ERF Appraisal Emergency Program Enhancement Items (97201)
This section addresses the status of the licensee's response to Emergency
Program Enhancement Items identified and discussed in detail with
cognizant licensee representatives during the ERFA performed June 27-30,
1988.
Enhancement items ara emergency program improvement areas
identified by the inspector.
The licensee committed to evaluate and
consider these items for implementation and/or correction, as indicated,
a.
(Closed) ERFA Enhancement Item:
Modifying the manual EPIP dose
calculation method to run on a personal computer or a computer system
separate from RADMET.
This computerized EPIP method could be made
available in the Control Room, TSC, LE0F, and CEOF.
Inspection disclosed that the licensee was preparing to revise the
manual dose assessment procedures to achieve the following:
l
(1) eliminate any differences that exist with the RADMET computer
!
code; (2) eliminate procedural redundancy; and (3) provide simple and
user-friendly instructions. The licensee projected a completion date
!
l.
of July 31, 1989.
Based upon its close relationship, this item will
'
be tracked as an adjunct to ERFA Open Item 50-338, 339/88-14-02,
I
1
_ _ _ -
l
'
I
.
,
.
'
4
.
above. This item is closed as a separate entity soley on this basis,
and- should be addressed in the subject ERFA open item corrective
action.
~b.
(Closed)' ERFA Enhancement item:
Conducting a more detailed
comparison between RADMET and the Commonwealth of Virginia's dose
assessment model following completion of the Commonwealth's proposed
modifications of the model.
Reasons should be identified if any
'
comparisons differ by more than a factor of 3.
Resolution of the subject item is contingent upon completion of
modification of the RADMET computer code addressed in ERFA Open
Item 50-338, 339/88-14-02, above. Projected completion date assigned
was July 31, 1989. Based upon its close relationship, this item will
be tracked as an adjunct to the referenced ERFA item. This item is
closed as a separate entity solely on this basis, and should be
addressed in the subject ERFA open item corrective action.
c.
(Closed) ERFA Enhancement Item:
Developing a version of the RADMET
model with a domain that extends through the ingestion pathway zone.
1
The licensee can use the GASPAR model provided via the Corporate
mainframe computer to perform ingestion pathway calculations. Access
to the respective code is available onsite.
d.
(Closed) ERFA Enhancement Item:
Providing support for a backup
method for estimating the vertical diffusion coefficient that does
not involve sigma theta.
Two possible alternates for this support
are an independent, backup delta T system, end implementation of a
procedure to estimate stability class from solar radiction and wind
i
speed.
The proposed corrective action for ERFA Open Item 88-14-03 elso
I
addresses- the subject Enhancement Item.
In response to this open
item, the licensee committed to revise the manual dose assessment
procedures to include the Pasquill-Gifford-Turner tables as a backup
method for determining stability class.
Based upon its close
relationship, the subject enhancement item will be factored into the
!
preposed corrective action of the referenced ERFA open item.
This
i
enhancement item is closed soley on this basis,
e.
(0 pen) ERFA Enhancement Ite:
Protecting the meteorological tower
instrument power supplies from the effects of power surges caused by
i
'
lightning strike.
1
Inspection disclosed that an engineering work request (88-223) was
generated to improve operation of the site meteorological tower,
including protection against lightning generated power surges.
The
licensee assigned a completion date of March 15, 1989.
This item
will be tracked as IFI 50-338, 339/89-02-01.
!
_
_
__
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
.
. - -_ _-
.
-
.
5
'
.
f.
(0 pen) ERFA Enhancement Item:
Replacing the instantaneous
meteorological data values available through' the SPDS with
time-averaged data, 'except where there is specific need for
instantaneous or spot data.
Inspection disclosed that the licensee intiatied required plans to
implement the above item, and has assigned a projected completion
date of April 1 - 1989.
Resolution of the subject item will be
tracked as IFI 50-338, 339/89-02-02.
g.
(0 pen) ERFA Enhanessnt Item:
Developing a procedure to test the
throw-over featura at the UPS buss.
Inspectio.. disclosed that the sutiject item was tracked on the ERFA
Action Plan.
No action regarding this item was reported; however,
the Action Plan assigned a completion date of April 1,1989.
This
item will be tracked as IFI 50-338, 339/89-02-03 until such time that
the commitment is resolved.
h.-
(0 pen) ERFA Enhancement Item:
Providing a preventive maintenance
(PM) program for key emergency ventilation system components.
The HVAC system walkdown was conducted to identify improperly labeled
equipment and provide local labeling of damper positions.
Additionally, a system evaluation for identifying other components
which needed to be included in the PM program were complete for the
TSC; however, the subject evaluation did not appear to be fully
completed for the LE0F.
This item will be tracked as IFI 50-338,
339/89-02-04.
i.
(Closed) ERFA Enhancement Item:
Revising the non-safety preventive
maintenance (PM) program to ensure periodic maintenance of non-safety
system and documentation thereof.
Inspection disclosed that modifications to the non-safety PM program
were implemented to ensure coverage of ERF systems as cited in
Item h, above.
It was questionable, however, whether the LE0F HVAC
system was adequately included by the PM program. This item will be
addressed and tr6cked under Item h, above. Accordingly, this item is
closed as a separate entity solely on this basis.
j.
(Closed) ERFA Enhancement Item:
Documenting periodic testing of
non-safety systems and the results thereof.
,
The PM testing program was expressly designed, and implemented to
provide. documentation of test results.
_
1
k.
(Closed) ERFA Enhancement Item:
Developing algorithms to coordinate
the SPDS top level display color code with the applicable EAL
parameter escalation values.
,
_ _ _ - _____ __ _
__
<
.
'
,
6
.
Inspection disclosed that the licensee performed a detailed
evaluation this item and determined that it was not feasible to add
the suggested capability to the existing SPDS.
4.
Status of Previous Non-ERFA Findings.(92701)
a.
(Closed) Violation 50-338, 339/88-24-01:
Failure to use most recent
revision of emergency personnel augmentation telephone call list.
The subject finding addresses failure of emergency personnel to
follow the requirements of Station Administrative Procedure ADM-6.4
via use of an uncontrolled, outdated revision of Section 1.2 of the
Station Augmentation Telephone Directory.
Inspection disclosed that
corrective action included the following:
(1) issuance of a memo by
the Station Manager to all
personnel
regarding required
implementation of Procedure ADM-6.4, which governs the use,
reproduction, storage, and availability of controlled documents;
(2) assurance that cognizant security personnel responsible for
initiatica of Emergency Response Augmentation Call-out obtain and
maintain updated controlled copies of Section 1.2 of the Station
Emergency Telephone Directory.
The corrective action was determined
to be adequate,
b.
(0 pen) Violation 50-338, 339/88-24-02:
Failure to demonstrate the
capability of meeting staffing requirements for emergency
preparedness reaponse team personnel.
The licensee submitted to the NRC a proposed revision of Tables 5.1
and 5.2 of Section 5 of the Station Emergency Plan addressing
emergency staff augmentation.
Resoluation of this item remains open
pending NRC review of the licensee's referenced submittal.
c.
(Closed) IFI 50-338, 339/88-24-03:
Incorporate a statement in the
drill report addressing whether drill objectives were met or same
were not met.
Develop an action plan to setisfy the correction.
Inspection disclosed that reports for drills conducted subsequent to
the subject finding addressed in detail drill objectives and the
status thereof. An adequate statement was included.
5.
Exit Interview
The inspection scope and findings were summarized on February 23, 1989,
!
with those persons indicated in Paragraph 1, above.
The inspector
described the areas evaluated and discussed in detail each ERFA open and
enhancement
item identified during the ERFA conducted in June 1988.
Enhancement items tracked by the licensee and assigned a projected
corrective action completion date will also be tracked as IFIs pending
resolution of these items.
These items are listed below.
The inspector
,
l
also discussed in detail the licensee's delay in providing prompt
implementation of corrective actions in response to appraisal findings.
'
l
-
- - _ -
__
__-
.
.-.
-- -. - _ - .
- _ _ _ -
'hr
',.
-
.:
. .
7.
~
.
i
No dissenting comments were expressed by the licensee. ' The licenseee 'did-
.not identify as proprietary any of the materials provided to or.'rev ewed
i
by.the. inspector during~this inspection.
Item
M
Description'
89-02-01'
.ERFA Enhancement Item
Protecting the meteorological
tower instrument power supplies
from 'the effects of power- surges
caused
by
lightning
strike
(Paragraph 3).
89-02-02
ERFA Enhacement Item
Replacing the spot meteorological
data values available through :the -
SPDS with time-averaged data,
except where there is spec _ific
need ~of the spot meteorological-
data (Paragraph 3).
89-02-03
ERFA Enhancement-Item
Developing a procedure to test
..
the throw-over feature of the UPS
buss (Paragraph 3).
89-02 04.
ERFA Enhancement Item
Providing a preventive maintenance
program
for
key
emergency-
ventilation - system components
(Paragraph 3).
_
._-
_1-----_---_-_
- - .
,
,
_ __ ____ _
_
,f
- - -
l
t'.
.
d#
, ,,,,,j[ [ [gf
" "# *
' ' ~
INSPECTOR'S REPORT
'
Office cf inspection and Ent:rce nent
l
.
k f'f'/ / b ) A
/M
e
a
T oa s.S a:TC%
DoCatt eso sesets>08 LfCINSI
afroat
hLui sN5*it DATI
LeCIhlti VI4 dos
" 'i
e,p ag. peDDwCTH13 891s-
sv C,
540
eso
va
p
ns5t**
g .g [ [ [ 3 ,3 y
Q f 0 L
(
. -f )
~
w - VOD'* *
} g[
h () ] .3 Y
_EY 0 .8
E
A f
A
-
'--
C - Di.fia
'
-
, . ... A:
i
- q 4g,f&55}EW$$hk NYW
s%5PE Ciaos og aipaut D s *
OstGAN12ATON COOL 08 fiEGONiHO CONDUC1-
PE suo 08 INvt 51eGAtch s%5PtC10A
j
8NG ACTivf77 (See Ewt D5.10 ".W. aru,some Aeoo r.
r
fADW
g/
', - pt GCNAL DestCl 51 A88
001mt8
%,g g
,gg
,
L^0
Dat l 78
wO
Dat
v6
2 - 8tSDthi sW5'f C70s,
~
EEGON
Dib r60N
i
isA a N c e.
M
I
Y
i
/
o12, 21/ l#l'/ () B 2W Alf
8'***N:"**'5"
w:wpswn; .=:mw2 - nnarmanmv(c
- zwge.summ
og gio% At gteos.
/
1'*t 08 ACim1' CD%DstilD #Caeo o se nos ow
' ' * * * * * * * * " '
/02 - S AFtT'
l Ut - wsV* WIS'T
1C
- LAN? SIC
la - INoviar
C F0mu ne'
_
(C - shCIDE A'
C1 - EP(CIAL
1? - INVENT VER
_
15 - INVE STIGATioh
_
2 - C tGohat 08fict tt* TIS
os - thsonCEwf A-
l 06 - vt4 DOS
12 - SmPwf NTIf XP081
/c
f
O! wGw1 AUD'1
j 0* - wai ACCT
13.aupons
T." ai*1%%y Wgghm4gu. g
f
Ww= ~ . . - n** =--*T**c ?i1 n~ W [.~.2R & v
~" :Y= 1
c.p i;;.y....ts.~~~.;'.F.'.
% 5
?C* A. huwist s
istC6CivlA*CCN8t* FACE
"I'O'ONo'Ni *
LITTia co nspont TaAN5wm AL Daft
- * * ** nc e o%
148C'#W ATs N
08viOJTONSANC
wl.D
A
D
C
D
Di nAiCNS
h4C 80mw 68'
- iPORT 5tN'
/ /
' * E 'I
om me t
TOHo aos
LTTTim f55JED
ACTCA
2- VCJ10h
3 - Of viatch
a ! t l C
g
A s e ;; j t ;
A
6
C
D
MC
Dav l VR
MC
DAv l vm
- i ;$ til
1. vg5
d3 p p/ j p g
l
l l l
l
a - voun'oN 6 0!vato%
p, g : g , g ,
,
TLL*&%WZ527M
WTWTTWNEFM
2522M5MN1MM?MMM
u~1
woDstt i%s oavainos
wens.: assomwateos
naoDu.s gowes a N5e
gg g
woDJ' f pf L s Cs.omis ^5
jd'e
.
woDuttAuwstarvie
dE F
"0DU'f * E 0 ' DL L D*V'
i
i E
i
E
5 IE
i
,
1 :,
se
r;
ee
. .e
e
1;
ee
e he a
s
e
s
r .e
- e
3 :r .
s
e
e
s. c.
y
-e.-
a
.
_
6
s
a
,.
.
r
=
.
e
.
,
-gy
y g,
g.
s
.
e-
!
U
I- ,
,
a
.*
EF
$0
l
Eth
) >c
.
.
$ j I ept
I 22
i>E
E
I
aC
F
- 25
i a5
gi
3
m
tSE
G
f
av
i ,
c
e
=
li M
g8
e
i
I
ad
i
SHJ
-
i!
hih,h
I e
i
i I
8 i
l
i i
l i
i l
i
ii
8
i
,
l,,l
t/bi h
b
a
t i
i
i i
g ,
, ,
,
i
i l
. e
i
l i
i i
i i
i
l i
t t
t t
i
I i
, i
i i
i il
I
D
D
t
Cl5 MlfiAllE
,IiiI
.h 5 f i3 1F'i N W
li
I
^
mis
,,
e
,
, i
i .
i
SM F/ / A
6,0,2
S #,Ni o,dB
I,,I
'
, ,
i ,
, i
i
liiI
Ii,I
i .
, ,
i
i ,
i ,
,
!,,I
li,I
"
'
o
, ,
, ,
i
i ,
, ,
,
/i3io l?i di3le
Mi /
liiI
d.
iliiI
d
liil
^
i i
i
i i
e i
i
e
i
i l
, l
i
e i
! l
l I
I
I i
~
I,,I
~
I,,1
, ,
, i
i
i i
, ,
i
I f
, '
I
i ,
, i
J l
f
f f
liiI dil
,liiI
liil
i i
i i
i liiI
'
e
i
i
i i
i i
i
'
I i
i i
f
, ,
i i
i j
i
l i
liil
liil
i i
, i
i
i i
i i
i
i
1 _
O O* Cal blouf hit H
-
g g
g g
g l g g l
] g
j g
]
,
)
w% Aieos o* De itiaisot
N 2 M $ 6 $ 7#,. %~ O l 1 61 CJ'J5] it? Lis] v51 2Dl2iM'.T ~ *f 3e] tlf3l4j C 7; d @ %
/ QKTg@M
Bl
--
- -
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _
_
'
I
I
I
.
l
I i ;
/
,
I
/'
I
.
I
A
!
5
E
E
E
/
T
T
H
H
T H
-
A
A
A
T
D
D
l
D
-
8
E
E
E
I
I
l
U
U
,
9
I
D
D
D
F
6
L
I
I
I
A
N
-
N
-
N
-
l
U
O
-
O
-
O
-
fID
Il
I
l
Il
T
T
!
T
l
V
C
C
C
,
I
I
I
I
A
A
A
/
D
l
N
I
I
I
f
I
Y
E
'
,
l
I
I
.
1
LN
/
ss
O
[
I
,I
li
1
I
St
I
u
/
S
e
Do
b
h
S
P p
F
S
/
N
M
O
I Ss
,I
'
S
II
t
I
l
N V
E
P
E/
S
P
T
[
S
ee
U
m
T
-h
I
!
E
R
R
hh
o
I
I
,I
!i
1!
R
r
tt
e
W
7[
I
f
E
hf
t
l
N
,
E
E
, I
I
I
go
E
s
k,
L
L
u
L
f
e
R
T
T
od
T
o
i
O
I
I
I
_
l
I re
,I
I
F
T
p
T
he
T
e
,
1
J
r
n
tn
p
e
.
E II
-
l
A
F
-
E
u
o
E
u
I
A
I
, I
t
V
ec
V
V
s
a
S
A
I
A
V
I
li
A
I
)
-
e
i
(
T
bf
E
T
L
'I
T
r
E
E
.
I
I
,I
I If
l
1
P
ai
R
P
-
R
P
e
R
I
w
A j
0
A >
1
l c
A
I
I
.
r
e!
R
ie
l
R
y
R
o
(
!
I ap
,I
I I e
I I
b
C
p
C
C
v
k
vs
T
S
i
S
S
o
d
a
S
E
t r
E
E
-
i
D
D
I
I
s
l
, I
e
I
D
nt
I
4
es
o
si
w
r
I
L
l
m
e
o
e
l
r
ue
t
F
ugI
F
l r
I
Ih
,I
I
I
S
I
n
r n
ae
f
t
M
J
1
l
e
1
t
i
vh
2
E 2
sn
e
nt
E
I
t
,
I
E
I
I
I
I
I
I
n
I
]
h
L
l
i h
L
a
L
l
o
E
t
0 e
g
0 e
t e
0
i
M
0
ar
ri
0
0
t
G
A
0
el
0
de
0
s
a
I
I
,
l
I
It
II
i
N
/
N
N f
w
N r
h
-
l
H
e
m
'4
I
l w
r
oyI
1
i
t
II
D
Y
a
l
tb
o
T
9
f
ct
N
o
f
A
i p
I
d
I
l
t
n
2
T
L
l
I
ge
,I
1I
l
e
I
S
a
oc
I
s
c
e
T
C
u
l x
r
l
i
l
oe
[
U
A
r
ga
s
I
u
l
,I
/
l
d
r
D
i
o c
F
o ,
i
l
e
8
Pv
.
E
l
E
e a
PF
E
c
s
I
-
o
e
,I
l
tt
/
r e
o
ea
lp
Y
og
Y
r
r
I
md
Y Z
T
r
e
T
.
p
//
T
m
I
a
I
t u
_
tdt
I
l
s
a
e
x
oea
E
m
pgd
g
r
sa
n
e
2
r
e w
rl
i
eea
3
/
o
h o
II
p
f
t
p
hvc
o
tai
l
e
C
gf
d '
- g
o
e
d
no
II
geo
v
i
!
i
nml
e
.
_
-
~
t s
r
~
-
ct r
s
i io
D
-
ct
.
iI
e
ec
a
o
1!'
lhe
s
t e
'
r
1 2
of
- % 2
2
ptt
e T
T
i rf lI
eie
.
v L!I
P e
,
Rwm
,
M$N . d o
6 "
e
6
m
U
U
s
R
n
-
~
_
u
- '
e
i
-
'
e
S a
I9f
f f
f
)Sa ^
i
"
1
(
8 #
9 #
F
.
"
J m_.
!i
-
'
-
1
,4
1 *
4
I
3
FC
T'
T
Tl T
Tf
Oa #
I l
I
D
I l
I
I
N"
N
N"
N
g #
U
U
U
U
il
.
l{l
ll
l'
__
_
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _
r-
i
'
-
-.
--
.
_
.
-
.
,,,
. . .
%
-
.
-
.--
_
.
--
g
g
g
-
w-
_._
_
.
s
--
<
i
<
.
Ex
mA
mA
-
-h
y
y
-
y
V
-
-
-
Y
@%8
3'I~
E
.
E
l
_
-
>-
.-
Q g
,_
W
W
W
"
-
-
-
!
--
-
-
-
-,
.
1
%
g ..
_
_,
I >-
-
w
-
_._
_
__
a
s
a!
l
-
8
a
-g-
q
-
-
__.
.__
5
o. M
M
l
@
u
a.
__
,
e
s
e
es
-
51%
e m mw
a
>- -
a
_.
E
-
5
hw
x
i
i
-
u
w
w
=
- -
,
c
a
a
a
h
&.
&
i
W
' .
g
>
- -
- -
u - -
m
{
V
C
\\
'F"""
~~~"
'
A
g
3
i
-
w
o
w
w
.
-
%
c.
a
c
-
<
_
< A
s_
< %
n.
~
-
w
_,
w
-
_.
w
-
-
-
_ _.
_
,
a r;-
a.
-
x
-
-
m
x
a
< ]g-
a=*
c
< ]
C
"g
,
g
s>
- ='
_
5
_g_
.__
___
,
m
%
m
m
,
.59
_g_
g
-g
g
g
e
-
-
_._
_
.$
a
.
u
cn
4
._
%
%
%
W
-
e
f'
l
"
N
w N
w
w
e
-
-
-
-
a
.
a
a d
o
E
E t
-g-
E
Et
si
--
-
W
E
s. %
e
.e w
[4
-
-
_
.
c
.
b >>
%
c
h
w'
- "
-
O
-
-
o.
g
$q=
- ,
,e !
-
,
-
-
m
x-
s
"
-
_=.
i
'.
~
s'
?. .,.,-
t'_
g
-
-
-
-
-
by
N
w
u.
E
y
C
O
o
k
%
-
p o-
4l
t G
5g
-
E
4
l
1
$U
a
a
h
wx
h
a
b
M
mNMW
L e
a
'
C.
E M N
s
.
3
swes
-
>
.m-
=
.
a
m Em =
<$ Q k
W EEEE
E
g
_
I
t
bj,'
J
,s t il
x x
2
g
M
s q'
i
-
p
m v
-
"
d
F
T
I
L -
~~m.
~~m
.
,~m
,
"
B
q t
dbCt
> - > - > -
>.
> . * . . > . . >.
j
- .-
..
%
EEEE
EE E E
'E E E E
--
a
. _ _ . _ , _
. _ . _ .
_ _ _ . _
_ _ . _ . . _ _
. . .
t
. .
- , ,
OUTSTANDINGITEMSLISJ(DiL)
F m T b'
- .
,
CLOSE0UT FORM
..
,
,
DOCKETNO.(S)
~ O U R A
I N A N A El
3
B
O
5 0
'
-
-
R5P0 plR.E..IM U 1DLW.
bApNAn-Masea37/#w
I
l
i
l
'
'
FACILITY
-
l
l
ITEM NIM ER ,
CL0S'E0U'T ACTION
i
6 2b
/ 4-0l
2 7
R R
-
^
-
6 26
\\
8 8
/ 4' -02
9 9
-
-
0 3
2 9
6 20
%
8 9
/ /
-
-
-
4e
0 2 0
6'/
8 9
/ f
<
-
1B B
.{
-
-
s z a
'
s ag
-
/ s- o s
e e
-
'
- #
$ # #
~~ I Y
'
- b
~
O
6 20
i
6' 1
B R
% 8 8
'
/ 4
-
-
--
v
,
2 4 -al
29-b2a
~
.SL 5 8 9
-
_
6 2 6
1
%'/ 8 A
K+'-62
8 9
-
-
2 4- 6 3
29-b20
IU
R
R
-
-
-
.
-
O
SEE F.EVERSE FOR EXAMPLES
l
- ..
_ _ _ _ - _ _