ML20247B751
| ML20247B751 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 03/20/1989 |
| From: | Martin T NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I) |
| To: | Creel G BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8903300026 | |
| Download: ML20247B751 (15) | |
Text
,- -_ 7 -_
-4y v'
- . s
?
- g; I,%R 201989 Docket No. 50-317 i
50-318
' Baltimore Gas and Electric Company ATTN: Mr. George C. Creel Vice President Nuclear Energy-
-Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant MD Rts 2 & 4, P.O. Box 1535' Lusby, Maryland 20657 Gentlemen:
Subject:
MAINTENANCE PROGRAM TEAM INSPECTION i
I This letter is-to inform you that the NRC intends to perform a team inspection i
of your maintenance program 'at the Calvert Cliffs 1 and 2 site. on April 24, 1989 through May 5, 1989, and to request your assistance in accomplishing this task. The inspection will focus on the performance of maintenance and whether components, systems and structures of your plant are adequately maintained and properly repaired so that they are available to perform their intended safety function.
(
In order for us to prepare for the inspection and maximize the onsite time I
spent in observation of maintenance'in progress, we request that you furnish the reference material listed in the enclosure to this letter. The team leader will be contacting you-shortly regarding the information that will be needed prior to the start of the inspection and.to arrange a suitable date for a l
meeting to explain the inspection and assessment methodology.
I A copy of draft NRC Temporary Instruction 2515/97 " Maintenance Inspection" is enclosed for your information and to aid in preparation for the insoection.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Suresh Chaudhary at 215/337-5335 or Jacque Durr at 215/337-5282.
)
l Sincerely, j
0: ir.1 :n1 N -.r2 By Jacqua P. Dun-i Thomas T. Martin, Director i
Division of Reactor Safety l
Enclosures:
As stated OFFICIAL RECORD COPY CHAUDHARY3/16/89 - 0031.0.0 03/20/89 8903300026 890320
) i L
PDR ADOCK 0D000317 T E ',0 l
\\
o PDC q
_ y
MAR 2 01989 Baltimore Gas and Electric. Company 2
cc w/ encl:
W. J. Lippold, General Supervisor, Technical Services Engineering T. Magette, Administrator, Nuclear Evaluations Public Document Room (PDR) local Public Document Room (LPDR)
Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)
NRC Resident Inspector
. State of Mary!and (2) bec w/ encl:
Region 1 Docket Room (with concurrences)
Management' Assistant, DRMA (w/o enc 1)
J. Wiggins, DRP L. Tripp, DRP D. Limroth, DRP P. Wilson, DRP R. Bores, DRSS S. McNeil, NRR PA0 (14) SALP Reports Only DEL RI:DRS RI:DRS RI:DRS Chaudhary/rw s Strosnider Durr 3//7/89 3/)7/89 3# o/89 0FFICIAL I:ECORD COPY CHAUDHARY3/16/89 - 0001.0.1 03/17/89
~-
ENCLOSURE To aid us in preparation for the maintenance inspection, please provide us with the following documents, procedures and information in accordance with the designated numbers.
If you do not have the requested document or information, it is not'necessary to' generate it to comply with this request. We recognize that'many of the documents requested separately may be inclusive in a larger single document.
Please provide three sets of the requested documents, one set tc be retained on-site for team use'during the inspection and two sets to.be sent to the Region I office for team preparation and inspection documentation.
A member of our staff will contact you regarding the best method of transmitting the documents to us.
Section 1-Description of General Plant Maintenance Activities 1-1 Maintenance administrative proce'dures.which describe your corrective, preventive and predictive maintenance activities.
1-2 Organization charts including the maintenance organization and plant wide organizations.
1-3 Procedures, charts and other documents which describe your Planning Department and its activities.
1-4 Documents which describe maintenance planning and scheduling meetings and status of maintenance activities.
1-5 Documents which describe the Maintenance and Operations interface during planning, scheduling, work start, work closeout and post maintenance / functional testing.
1-6 Documents which describe your work control process:
how a work order is started, planned, assigned, executed, completed, closed out and
. here contractors are used, how are equipbent returned to service.
W l
they integrated into this process and controlled?
1-7 Documents which describe training and retraining of plant and contractor maintenance personnel, including Radiation Protection specific training. (For maintenance activities only, do not include General Employee Training.)
1-8 Decuments which describe maintenance work procedure establishment and control: Criteria as to when a procedure is to be used; initial
-writeup; reviews and approval; revisions; human factors reviews; QA reviews; requirements for conduct of work; troubleshooting criteria; work closeout; post maintenance testing and restoration of systems.
1-10 Description of methods used by which the adequacy and effectiveness of the maintenance is measured. Are maintenance performance indicators used?
What are they? Who is informed of the results?
1 l
2 1-11 Description of process for communications with vendors for technical services and latest technical information on equipment and systems installed at the plant, and interfaces with vendors or NSSS for training, modifications and equipment replacement.
1-12 Documents which describe the preventive maintenance and predictive maintenance programs.
- Which equipment is included?
Hcw is maintenance frequency determined?
+ What is done with results of these maintenance actions.
1-13 Documents which describe management involvement in maintenance.
Are there goals set for the maintenance and I&C Departments?
Are these goals used in the perfstmance evaluation of managers and supervisors?
- Are these goals communicated to first line supervisors and chiefs?
1-14 Documents which describe the Industrial Safety Policy and its incorporation into the maintenance program (safety manual, safety training, safety audits, accident reporting and investigations.)
1-15 Documents which describe the interfaces between Maintenance and Health Physics in work planning, scheduling and actual performance of mainentance activities.
~"
Section 2-Status of Plant and Contractor Personnel Who Perform Maintenance 2-1 The number of craft personnel for electrical, mechanical and I&C maintenance organizations.
Please include foremen and the foreman to, craft ratios.
2-2 The average years of experience for each individual and the turnovtr rate.
2-3 Description of shift work and work assignments. How do licensee supervisors decide on which craft or contractor is to perform what type of work?
Section 3-Status of Plant Equipment' and Plant Maintenance 3-1 What equipment failures occurred during the last year of operations?
3-2. What equipment failures have been found during shutdown of the plant, since and including the last refueling outage?
3-3 Describe maintenance and testing implemented for diesel generators and IE electrical equipment.
4 3
3-4 What component failures present greatest risk from a probabilistic risk standpoint to the plant and how is this information utilized in establishing preventive and predictive maintenance practices?
3-5 What have been the areas of high maintenance activity on safety related and non-safety related equipment and components?
3-6 Provide the following status concerning Maintenance Work Orders (MWD).
- Current total listing and status of MW0s, number in planning, number in final sign-off, number on hold for lack of parts, number on hold for engineering rasistance, number available to be worked on
- Projected number of corrective MW0s to be outstanding at start-up by priority
- Ratio of completion of corrective MWO in terms of number completed / month and manhours expended (by craft)/ month for the past 12 months
- Current number of preventive maintenance work orders overdue
- Ratio of completion of preventive MWO for the past 12 months
- Estimated manhours required to complete the current backlog of preventive MW0s
- Number of MW0s requiring rework over past 6 months 3-7 Provide five corrective maintenance procedures for work that is scheduled for the upcoming outage (e.g., Motor Operated Valves, Solenoid Operated Valves, Safety / Relief Valves, Emergency Core Coofing System Pumps, Switchgear, etc.)
3-8 Provide five preventive maintenance procedures for work that are scheduled for the upcoming outage.
3-9 Provide your overall outage schedule.
g'* *%
UNITED STATES I
/N, 1
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
/
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 NRC INSPECTION MANUAL Otra TEMPORARY INSTRUCTION 2515/97 1
MAINTENANCE. INSPECTION 2515/97-01 PURPOSE This temporary instruction (TI) provides guidance for conducting a perfor-mance-based inspection of an established and implemented maintenance process-at all operating nuclear power stations.
2515/97-02 OBJECTIVES The primary objective of this TI is to determine whether all components, systems, and structures of nuclear power plants are adequately maintained so that they are available to perform their intended functions.
Additionally, this TI should determine whether the maintenance process provides for the
)
prompt repair of plant components, systems, and structures, as appropriate to their prescribed functions.
2515/97-03 BACKGROUND NRC has examined their nuclear power plant maintenance programs and has found a wide variation in their effectiveness.
Inadequate maintenance has been a significant contributor to plant and system reliability. problems and, thus, is a safety concern.
Analysis of operational events has shown that nuclear power plant components are not being maintained at a level commensurate with their importance to safety.
This TI was developed to inspect and assess the effectiveness of maintenance at selected nuclear power plant sites.
A Maintenance Inspection Tree (logic tree) will be used as guidance during these inspections to collate and present inspection findings. :The tree is intended to provide a systematic approach to the performance of the inspections and to ensure consistency.
2515/97-04 CONDUCTING TEAM INSPECTIONS The maintenance team inspections will be announced when the team leader prepares for the pre-inspection visit (Section 04.01) to the site. The full-scope inspection cycle will generally be of a 6-week duration, with the team leader possibly taking an additional 2 weeks to initially coordinate the
,j inspection, gather information, and issue the final inspection report.
Issue Date:
11/03/88
The 6 weeks of team effort should generally consist of I week of preparation, I week of in-office inspection, 2 weeks of onsite inspection, and 2 weeks of documentation.
The sequence of the inspection effort will be determined by j
the regional office.
For example, the 2 weeks of onsite inspection may be consecutive or separated by I week of in-office inspection.
(
Generally, the inspection teun will be composed of the following six members:
one team leader (region) two reac;ar/ project engineers (region) one radiation specialist (region) two enginee.rs (ilQ)
The team composition and/or the extent of effort for individual members may be adjusted by the region.
For example, the extent of involvement of the radiation specialist may be less than 6 full weeks, as determined by the regional office.
In addition, the regions may include involvement 'of the resident inspector (RI) to the extent that is normally covered by IP-62703 monthly examinat, ions.-
The RI should. be.provided training in the use of the logic tree. by,the appropriate team -leader for this purpose.
The project manager (PM) will be generally involved with each inspection to the following extent:
be available to the team leader to facilitate contacts with the licensee attend.1.to.2 days of the. team preparation-attend. final pre-exit team meeting attend exi.t meetings
)
(,
The team 'will determine what recent failures ~of significant 1 equipment (probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)-identified, safety-related, or balance of plant (80P) that. affects safety-related and special interest items) have occurred and will inspect the licensee's maintenance activ_itids to schedule, repair, and prevent further failure of that equipment.
Other selective examinations of' equipment failures attributed to maintenance will be examined to determine, the - adequacy of licensee corrective actions' and root cause determinations of.the failures. The inspection should be' performed following review 'of. the elements of. the Maintenance Inspection Tree-(working tree) and the additional..insp,ectipn Guidance 'lolumes I and II (guidance provided in the Maintenance Inspection a separately distributed).
This guidance should be used as an aid in determining adequacy and implementation of maintenance activities and.to evaluate them. -The tree is also used as'a tool'to provide uniformity.in inspection structure and.in the prelimir.ary recording of the inspection results.. It is important to stress that tte tree does not driv ~e the inspection, but it does represent. guidance on the areas of inspection.to be addressed, with inspection..results recorded on t'ee tree to the extent completed.
The tree consists of three major sections:
(1) Overall Plant Performance, (2) Management Support of Maintenance, and (3) Maintenance Implementation.
The inspection requirements for Maintenance Implementation, which focus on the plant sys tems, components, test and surveillance data, and related activities, will receive the major portion (at least 80 percent, including direct observations of maintenance being performed) of the inspection effort.
Issue Date:
11/03/88 2515/97
e It should be recognized that inspection results from the flaintenance
}
Implementation area will also provide input to the Management Support area.
It is expected that portions of the Management Support of Maintenance sections of the tree, especially the Management Commitment and Management Organization sections, could be conducted by a single team member in a relatively short time.
The amount of inspection effort devoted to the individual subsections of the tree will be determined by the regional. office, taking into account recent inspection findings, time and staff limitations, and future inspec-tions planned to cover specific areas.
The inspection is to determine the effectiveness of the total integrated maintenance process of the power reactor licensees.
Therefore, the team inspection may be directed into areas for which explicit regulatory require-ments may not exist.
Thus, the inspection is oriented toward analyzing the performance of maintenance activities rather than toward the idMtifi-cation of violations. A specific example of an area not subject to u plicit requirements is the licensee's participation with the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO).
Review of licensee resolution of IllP0 activities shall be conducted in accordance with established policy and, thus, observa-tions in this area, when warranted, should be treated as indicators of strengths or weaknesses.
Although the inspection may result in the identification of inadequacies that l
are not covered by explicit regulatory requirements, there is no intent to
{
" ratchet" licensees.
Individual findings that licensees are not following 1
published NRC guides and industry guidelines do not necessarily indicate that
)
a program or area is inadequate.
The goal of the inspe'ction effort is to.
i emphasize the use of plant experience, test and surveillance data, recent component failures, PRA insights, and items of interest in evaluating the licensee's maintenance process in terms of capabilities and performance, and to identify major strengths and weaknesses as they are related to safety significance.
04.01 Team Leader Preparation.
A meeting should be planned and held with the licensee to describe the scope of the inspection and to obtain prelimin-1 ary review materials, such as the licensee's procedures for ' planning, conducting and assessing maintenance, as well as organizational charts, work schedules, equipment lists, component failure data, completed work orders, and related quality control (QC) inspection. procedures.-
The material obtained by the team leader from the licensee should be distributed to the team members for their review.
Following. completion of the in-office review of the licensee's maintenance process, the iieam leader will discuss the l
results of these reviews with the team members and factor them into the plan for the onsite inspection.
04.02 Inspection Preparation.
In preparation for site inspections, the inspection team should review the elements of the !!aintenance Inspection Tree to determine which areas may have received recent inspections, which areas may not be applicable, and which areas will be reviewed at the plant site.
The three major parts of maintenance (i.e.,
overall plant performance, management support of maintenance, and maintenance implementation) should be inspected to the degree required to provide a valid conclusion regarding the
)
effectiveness of the licensee's maintenance program.
2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
v l
During the preparation phase, the team should select several components
-)
and/or systems for detailed inspec'tiorf either through. consideration of PRA insights, recent compo6ent ~ failures i n. safety-related or B0P systems that
(
{
af fect safety, or selected equipment of heightened interest to the Commis-sion, such as check valves,'moto'r-operated valves, solenoid-operated valves, and air sy s tems.
The PRA insights 'may be used to select components or activities whose potential failures are predicted to contribute 'most to the f
risk at that plant.
At least One high-r.isk system should be included to j
verify that all performan.ce-related~ maintena.nce has been accomplished, including preventive maintenance.
Recent. equipment failures provide a vehicle for review of 'various aspects,of maintenance, including root-cause
)
analysis, equipment history, correcti.ve a c tion's, and past maintenance j
(preventive or corrective).
Inspection.of failed equipment repairs or work j
packages will provide' the 'dpportu'.nity 'to examine the. adequacy of the inter-action of all licensde fun'ctions^ supporting maintenance, including engi-
{
neering analyses and treriding.
y,'., j.
g
./n..
>>2 Review of performance. 16dicator' data, systematic assessment of licensee performance '(SALP) repo'rts', previous, inspection findings, licensee event reports (LERs), ' maintenance, rad _iht. ion. exposure ' history,.and other direct measures may iddntify potent.ial weak are.as.7.at that plant for which more detailed inspection' may be required.. F..igure. '.1 (Ini;pection Flowchart)
' depicts the initiators that ma'y be" selected'to enter the tr.ce.
During the preparation phase, progr.an); strengths.and.. weaknesses in certain areas may be recorded on the Maintenance Ipspection Tre'e (working tree).
If I
there are suffici~ent data to;pr'o' vide drile:valupt{on'. rat'ing.during the prepara-tion, the ' elements 'should bb' rated' in. accoidan' e with.the Maintenance
)
c Inspection Guidance.' However, seldct'e'd ' items' and, i.n parficular, identified f--
weaknesses should' be verified 'duridg th.e.. 'ons i te even if an evaluation rat'ing ! s assigned during t.h(e" prep'arati.06. inspection.,
i
~
04.03 OnsiteIn'spection.,An'entran'ce'm.eeli.ng'shal1Ye'heldwiththellicen-see to detail the ' scope and sche'dule of the inspection, iritroduce the team members, and establish the lj:ensee's contacts the inspection.
The team should obtain from the lictnsee the status of,for
.ongo,ing work applicable to the inspection 'of that' may affect the.performan~ce ~6f the.. inspection or the inspection schedule".
Schedules' and plad'for t.he exit.' meetings and the interim meetings ~jbetieen the Teamlleader'.and' licensee /managecient should also be established ~dur;ing the. entra. nce,meeti,ng.. n,.
..g o
.r Team members shal.1 perf6r.m4a detailt:d wa.1.kdown inspection.of the plant on'the first or 'second day on' dte'? t'o observe.'. ths overall ~ plant and, equipment
-Th'li;%aTkdown inspectior$, in, which the team.should condition..of ' ' numerous 'l' valves,, pumps,, motors,. etc.,
material conditi6k observe the should include, but not be l'iniited 'to the following:
Condition of components n..
Significance of tagged equipment,.
Housekeeping and environment Adequacy of labeling Comparisons with drawings and/or procedures Status of annunciators
)
This walkdown inspection may provide indications cf areas requiring further
~
examination during the inspection.
Issue Date: 11/03/88 2515/97
The onsite inspection should focus on the direct observation of work in
)
progress, including the following of licensee work with equipment in progress (e.g.,
tagouts, procedures, work packages, engineering support, materials, communications, testing, approvals, quality control holdpoints, l
etc.), significance of the maintenance backlog, rework, licensee assessment I
of the performance of maintenance, work control processes, control of inter-faces, post-maintenance testing, plant material condition, and maintenance facilities.
On the basis of the collected data, the team should determine the apparent cause of any problems noted; that is, if the cause is related to the adequacy 2
of procedures, work packages, qualiff. cation of personnel, management, engineering, etc. This analysis should provide entry into specific elements of the tree, which then becomes a tool to explore the suspected causes and to assess effectiveness of the implementation of applicable elements.
All areas listed need not be used in forming conclusions for each element.
Furthermore, other areas of inspection selected by the team may be used for entry to tree elements.
04.04 Analysis.
Using the inspection findings and results noted on the Maintenance Inspection Tree, the team should determine whether each of the areas inspected has been adequately implemented by the licensee and whether or not there is enough information to assign a rating.
The Maintenance l
Inspection Guidance and Criteria previously provided also assists use of the Maintenance Inspection Tree. The team will assign a rating to the applicable i
elements identified on the work sheets.
.)
The team should assign an overall evaluation rating to each of the elements inspected.
When this analysis has been completed, an overall rating can be l
\\
determined in accordance with the Maintenance Inspection Guidance and Criteria.
1 04.05 Exit Meeting.
Before the final days of inspection, issues and findings should be reduced to definitive writing and then used to highlight
. ]
the presentation version of the Maintenance Inspection Tree (the Presentation Tree) and to complete the rating roll-up. The exit meeting should include a l
brief discussion of the preliminary inspection findings using the Presenta-l tion Tree to depict inspection,results in a sumary fashion; however, the l
licensee should be informed that the findings are preliminary until they are l
l reviewed by regional management and the inspection report'is issued.
04.06 Report Preparation.
Because of the broad extent of the inspection, I
documentation-of inspection activities should begin early in the process to minimize the time required to complete the final report.
The final report should document the assumptions used, the elements inspected, the elements that were not applicable, licensee strengths and weaknesses, and overall conclusions consistent with IMC-0610.
The report should address elements of l
the tree to at least the depth of the tier with eight areas (e.g., Direct Neasures, Hanagement Commitment and Involvement, etc.).
04.07 follow Up.
Any unresolved findinos identified during the inspection
~
will be appropriately tracked and resolved by the regional office.
2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
2515/97-05 INSPECT 10tl REQUIREMENTS
)
(
The inspection shall include selective examinations of the aspects of main-tenance listed in Sections 05.01 through 05.03, including each of the areas and related elements of licensee activities identified under the sections.
To the extent possible, selective examinations should be based on observation l
of maintenance and equipment work activities in progress, review of licensee implementation of maintenance procedures and controls, results of review of selected documents (such as work packages, equipment test results, and engi-neering evaluations), and interviews with personnel).
05.01 Overall Plant performance Related to Maintenance a.
Direct Measures.
The team shall conduct appropriate examinations of plant operability, equipment availability, and plant material condition that can be directly related to the effective implementa-l tion of a maintenance process.e Before conducting the inspection of plant performance, the inspector should review available plant information. on (1) availability, (2) operability, and (3) reliability.
Information on these items can'be.obtained from the plant's operating history.
Other sources for obtaining the information are SALP reports, Performance Indicator Data, AE00-Scram Studies, ESF Actuation Studies, Safety System Unavailability Studies, Technical Specification Violations, Monthly Operating Reporty Data, and Capacity Factors from NUREG-0020. Data collection should be directed to those measures related to safety significant aspects of the maintenance process.
In addition, the inspector should conduct a detailed walkdown inspection of the overall plant
)i f-matehl condition to assess the effectiveness.of the licensee's maintenance -
(-
process to the extent that it is reflected in plant. housekeeping and in the external condition of equipment. The scope of the inspection should include examination of direct measures by using 'nformation gleaned from plant and equipment for the following:
Histori al data Material condition l
05.02 Nanagement Support of Haintenanc'e 1
a.
Management Commitment and Involvement.
The. examination of nianagement -
effectiveness concerning maintenance. should be directed to de.ter-mining the extent of corporate ;and ' plant management awareness and support of the maintenance and resolution of maintenance problems and should include examination.of:
The application of industry initiatives Extent of management direct participation in maintenance and in
~
correctiveactions(managementvigorandexample) b.
Management Organization and Administration.
The inspection of management organization and administration controls should be directed to determining how the organization supports maintenance activities, what maintenance activity plan has been established, hw the maintenance activity plan has been implemented, corrected, and l
controlled, and the control of resources.
The inspection should include examination of:
l l
Issue Date:
11/03/88 2515/97
I Program coverage for maintenance
)
Policy, goals, and objectives for maintenance Allocation of resources Definition of maintenance requirements Performance measurement Document Control System for maintenance Maiinenance decision process t
c.
Technical Support. The areas that are to be selectively examined for the technical support organizations with regard to maintenance are as follows:
Internal and/or corporate communication channels Engineering control
/
Incorporation of PRA into the maintenance process
' Quality ' control Incorporation of radiological controls into maintenance process.
Safety Review Cs mittees Regulatory documents Examples of the applicable departments or organizations subject to this inspection are:
Engineering (nuclear, instrumentation and control (IAC),
Quality Assurance (QA), licensing, systems, etc.)
mechanical, electrical
)
Quality Control (QC)
HealthPhysics(HP)
Safety Fire Protection Operations 1
05.03 Maintenance Implementation i
a.
Work Control.-
The inspection of the work control process should be 1
directed to work order documentation, equipment history, observation i
of testing in progress, planning and scheduling, and document review.
The inspection should include selective e~xamination of:
i Review of inaintenance in progress Work. order control Maintenance of equipment records and history Job planning Work prioritization Maintenance work scheduling Backlog controls Maintenance procedures l
Post-maintenance testing Review of completed work control documents b.
Plant Maintenance Organization.
The inspection of the plant mainte-nance organization should be directed to how the organization supports maintenance activities, how the maintenance activities are controlled, implemented, and corrected, how personnel are controlled, how the organization establishes documentation, the effectiveness of.
2515/97 Issue Date: 11/03/88
4 b
I I
the coordination and feedback lines of communication between plant l
)
management and craf t personnel. and the effectiveness of interfaces
(
with other -departments, especially operations.
The inspection should
{
include selective examination of:
j i
Control of plant maintenance activities Control of contracted maintenance Deficiency identification, control, and corrective action system
)
liaintenance trending l
Support interfaces I
c.
flaintenance Facilities, Equipment, and Materials Control.
The fol-
)
lowing are to be selectively examined for the area of facilities, equipment, and material. controls, as well as for their support of the maintenance process:
Maintenance facilit'fes and equipment l
Material controls l
Maintenance tool and equipment control l
Control and calibration of measurement and test equipment i
I i
d.
Personnel Control.
The following areas of personnel, control are to be selectively
- examined, including consideration of
- staffing, training, and qualification:
l Staffing cont'rol Personnel training Test and qualification process Assessment of the current personnel control status 2515/97-~06 REPORTING REQUIREMEllTS l
The appropriate regional office will document the findings and the actions l
taken in an inspection. report,and, in addition to the normal distribution, will forward one. copy to the Director, Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation,.0ffice of:NRR, and one copy to the, Director, Division of Reactor Safety, in, each of the other. regional offices.
2515/97-07 COMPLETION SCHEDULE Inspections should be scheduled so that they are completed within 2 years of the issuance of this instruction.
2515/97-08 EXPIRATION This temporary instruction shall remain in effect for 24 months or until the inspections have been completed.
1 2515/97-09 NRR CONTACT s
Any questions regarding this temporary instruction should be addressed to
(
A. T. Gody (301-492-1117).
\\.
Issue Date: 11/03/88 2515/97 8
r 2515/97-10 STATISTICAL DATA REPORTIt'G for 766 or RITS input, the actual inspection effort should be recorded against this TI, mciule number 25597.
2515/97-11 ORIGillATIt!G ORGANIZATION IllFORMATION 11.01 Organization Responsibilities. The Performance and Quality Evaluation Branch of NRR will provide support and overall guidance for these inspec-i tions.
1 11.02 Estimated Resources.
Each inspection is planned for 6 weeks for 6 I
~
persons with 2 of the 6 weeks being direct onsite inspection ' (12 ' staff weeks) and I wee't in-office inspection, with expected additional effort by the team leader (a total of 38 staff weeks).
This total includes.prepara-tion, inspectior, and report writing.
i 11.03 Parallel Inspection Procedures The inspection procedures that this TI may satisfy totally or in part are listed below.
6there credit is taken, the inspection report should note the module number per !IMC-0610.
The region should make final determinations based on the scope and documentation of the inspection.
1 37701 56700 62704 j
37702 61700 62705
)
37828 CIP 6172 72701 38701 62700 83000 series l
38702 62702 92700 CIP 41400 62703 CIP 92701 EllD i
l
~
a I
)
2515/97 !ssue Date: 11/03/86
_--.--_________---J
s<
~.
n.ew*
v gw '*'
V eg
- t. e w s **
e p
,1 g
,n n
P r
Q,'w.
T
, e 1
t p e t
e.
n
. n-p m
P p
e.
1 e
o w.
n n
P t
o n.
rn 1
o t
r n
T ia m
w r
sd mle e
i ef 1
lbr tt vE o e R
r U
d G
Pl I
F p
y M
W g
g s
)
e s
e o
s e
m n
n g
R t
tm o
e r
r e
n E
o e
t s
e o
lu )s e
t t
mt n
i y
ee t
r i
L p
d) e t y v
li o e nt e
is d
r S
me er w
d f
f d
e R
r o
e sn rir b
r t
P O
e n o n
t ea es e
tu la L
io, e
k T
ct e
A m
n,
i e
s rb e
r c
r S
A
.c e
eO mo T
t n tu o
ee fpw ps e
e t
e n
c eo I
o o
o Ap n =,
n.
pc u.
ss c
c sn qS n
n n
I nm e
na t
re=
tn se in eO ii, N
e o a
a r
ie o
te R
s n
n I
c s
e mv m
nt iP u
t e
e e
m do eN fos r
e1 r
t t
E f
mk t
(
iN c(
ln le i
v r
E fo o o s
e o
o c e o.
e r
e p
R S
t T
R R
P M
M T
RA I
M S
.I 9h( S v
2RE b
pwg 8
ll j