ML20246N412
| ML20246N412 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/09/1989 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20246N407 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8905190426 | |
| Download: ML20246N412 (2) | |
Text
E~
coo
'.[_Y)g '(g UNITED STATES
+
i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION p
j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 g~/
e is,.*
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT N0.71 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO NPF-10 AND AMENDMENT NO. 59 TO FACILITY CPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDIS0N COMPANY SAN DIEGO GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY THE CITY OF RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA S_AN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET N05. 50-361 AND 50-362
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Southern California Edison Company Sy letter dated February 14,)1989, (SCE), et al. (the licensees, requested a change to the Technical Speci-fications for Facility Operating Licenses No. NPF-10 and NPF-15 that authorize operation of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS),
Units 2 and 3 in San Diego County, California.
2.0 EVALUATION Individuals who are designated to be responsible for directing the licensed activities of licensed operators are required by 10 CFR 50.54(1) to maintain a senior reactor operator (SRO) license. At SONGS Units 2 and 3, the Assistant Plant Superintendent is designated to be responsible for directing the licensed activities of licensed operators. Technical Specification 6.2.2.g specifies the SRO license requiren.cnts for the unit staff, however, it does not address the Assistant Plant Superintendent position. The proposed change would modify Section 6.2.2 9 to explicitly require the Assistant Plant Superintendent to hold an SR0 license. The American National Standard ANSI /ANS-3.1-1987 provides guidarice on the qualifications of the unit staff. The proposed Technical Specification change conforms to that guidance.
Because this change meets the intent of 10 CFR 50.54(1) and ensures that the requirement is met, it is acceptable.
l 8905190426 890509 PDR ADOCK 05000361 P
4 3.0 CONTACT WITH STATE OFFICIAL The NRC staff has advised the Chief of the Radiological Health Branch, State Department of Health Services, State of California, of the proposed determination of no significant hazards consideration. No comments were received.
4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
The amendments involve changes in administrative requirements. Accordingly, the amendments meet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set.
forthin10CFR51.22(c)(10). Pursuantto10CFR51.22(b);noenvironmental impact state-ment or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection
. ith the issuance of this amendments.
w
5.0 CONCLUSION
We have concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that:
(1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the p(ublic will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner,.2) such ac regulations and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the
.public.
Principal Contributor: D.Hickman Dated: May 9, 1989
.