ML20246N043

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Insp Rept 50-285/89-01 on 890313-31 & 0417-21 & Notice of Violation.Util Attention Directed to safety- Related Cable Tray & Control Room Panel Conditions Described in Section 3.0 of Encl Rept
ML20246N043
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 07/14/1989
From: Milhoan J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Morris K
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
Shared Package
ML20246N049 List:
References
NUDOCS 8907190283
Download: ML20246N043 (3)


See also: IR 05000285/1989001

Text

.

In Reply Refer To:

Docket:

50-285/89-01

t/

{

j

Omaha Public Power District

ATTN:

Kenneth J. Morris, Division Manager

Nuclear Operations

1623 Harney Street

Omaha, Nebraska 68102

Gentlemen:

This refers to the team inspection conducted by members of our staff during the

period March 13-31, 1989, and April 17-21, 1989, of activities authorized by NRC

Operating License DPR-40 for the Fort Calhoun Station, and to the discussions

of our findings with you and other members of your staff at the conclusion of

1

the inspection.

This inspection was a performance-based inspection of maintenance activities

consisting of overall plant performance related to maintenance management,

support of maintenance, and maintenance implementation.

The inspection

consisted of selective examinations of work control procedures and

representative records, interviews, and observations of work in progress by the

NRC inspectors.

The team findings are documented in the enclosed inspection

report.

During this inspection, it was found that some of your activities were in

violation of NRC requirements.

Consequently, you are required to respond to

these violations, in writing, in accordance with the provisions of

Section 2.2U1 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of

Federal Regulations. Your response should be based on the specifics contained

in the Notice of Violation enclosed with this letter.

Your attention is directed to the safety-related cable tray and control room

panel conditions described in Section 3.0 of the enclosed report.

In

evaluating the overall significance of these issues, substantial consideration

was given to the major improvements in overall plant conditions that you have

recently achieved.

However, additional management attention is needed with

respect to the apparently isolated specific conditions noted.

NRC inspectors

and management will focus attention on this concern in the future.

Should

these kinds of conditions be evaluated as no longer isolated instar.ces, we will

consider all available options in resolving our concerns.

This inspection found that there were problems with the implementation of the

maintenance program. The weak areas appear to be addressed in your Safety

Enhancement Progr

(SEP).

The maintenance team inspection results indicate

that, while the pr gram is being improved, implementation lag ,

ogram

RIV:0PS

CC P

C:PSS*

C:RPB*

C:DRP/D*

D:

ian

JL

oan

J]F/d/89 /l /89

DLKelle

b

JEG .liardo

TFStetka

BMurray

EHoller

' /p /89

/89

/ /89

/ /89

/ /89

'

  • )reviously to c roed

8907190283 890714

PDR

ADOCK 05000285

\\t\\l

O

PDC

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _

_

.

.

.

,

,

.

Omaha Public Power District

-2-

development activities.

However, we conclude that your efforts to build an

effective program are having an effect. We believe that in the long term, this

effect will be positive.

This inspection disclosed that the implementation of

new programmatic controls brings about a cultural change.

Craftsmen accustomed

to working without programmatic limits may not easily adjust to working within

those limits. We view this as a challenge to licensee management and will

monitor progress on future inspections.

Two unresolved items were identified in paragraphs 2.1.1.3 and 2.3.1 of the

enclosed inspection report.

!

The response directed by this letter is not subject to the clearance procedures

j

of the Office of Management and Budget as required by the Paperwork Reduction

'

Act of 1980, PL 96-511.

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to

!

discuss them with you.

l

Sincerely,

James L. Milhoan, Director

Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosures:

1.

Appendix A - Notice of Violation

2.

Appendix B - NRC Inspection Report

50-285/89-01 w/ Attachment

'

cc w/ enclosures:

Fort Calhoun Station

ATTN:

G. R. Peterson, Manager

P.O. Box ?SS

Fort Calhoun, hebraska 68023

Harry H. Voigt, Esq.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae

1333 New Hampshire Avenue, NW

l

Washington, DC 20036

1

Nebraska Radiation Control Program Director

j

bec w/ enclosures:

(see next page)

!

i

!

!

1

!

- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ _ - _

,

.

.

_

.

.

'

,

.-

3

d

Dmaha Public Power District

-3-

bec w/ enclosures:

bec to DMB (IE01)

bec distrib. by RIV:

  • R.D. Martin, RA
  • RPB-DRSS
  • Section Chief (DRP/B)
  • MIS System
  • RIV File
  • DRP
  • RSTS Operator
  • Project Engineer (DRP/B)

Lisa Shea, RM/ALF

  • DRS (2 copies)
  • P. Milano, NRR Project Manager (MS:

13-D-18)

  • RRI
  • D.

L. Kelley

  • J. E. Gagliardo
  • R. B. Vickrey
  • H. D. Chaney
  • J.

Huang

  • M. E. Skow
  • A. Singh
  • T. F. Stetka
  • B. Murray
  • E. Holler
  • w/766

h

1

i

'

l

l

.

1

l

l

<

.

L_________.__

_ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ _ _ _ . _ .

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .

_ _ _ _ _

__

________________J