ML20246J816
| ML20246J816 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 05/09/1989 |
| From: | Clark R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Hunger G PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20246J821 | List: |
| References | |
| TAC-71385, NUDOCS 8905170178 | |
| Download: ML20246J816 (3) | |
Text
-r L
May 9, 1989 ocket No. 50-353 DISTRIBUTION 1
Docket File. A RClark Mr. George A. Hunger, Jr.
M0'Brien ETrottier Director-Licensing Local PDR EJordan 1
3 Philadelphia Electric Company PDI-2 Reading BGrimes Correspondence Control Desk SVarga BBoger P. O. Box 7520 ACRS(10)
WButler Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
Dear Mr. Hunger:
SUBJECT:
TURBINE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (TAC NO. 71385)
RE:
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 2 Section 3.5.1.3.3 of the Safety Evaluation Report (SER), NUREG-0991, for Limerick Generating Station (LGS) indicates that-Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo) should submit "a turbine system maintenance program based on the manufacturer's calculations of missile generation probabilities", for NRC approval. Such a program was submitted for LGS, Unit I by your letter of May 26, 1987 and approved by our letter of November 3, 1987.
Your letter of August 19, 1988 submitted a similar program for LGS, Unit 2.
As discussed in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, we have completed our review of your proposed program and conclude that the maintenance program described in your submittal is acceptable. We also conclude 1) that you used staff approved methodology to calculate the turbine missile generation probability, which is an important part of the turbine maintenance program, and 2) that the turbine missile generation probability satisfies the staff's turbine reliability criteria as specified in the Limerick SER.
With regard to our Safety Issues Management System (SIMS), the requirement was to submit a program.
Even though the related inspection program will continue for the life of the plant, we consider this action item to have been conpleted with the submittal of an acceptable program.
Sincerely, Original signed by Richard J. Clark Richard J. Clark, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure:
l See next page pfol I,f I
[ LIME LTR]
t G)
/
RClark: -
WButlerJ/-
PDI-2/D PDI-2/PP of/op /89 g/f/89 8905170178 890509 PDR ADOCK 05000353 A
PNU w__
May 9, 1989 Docket $o. 50-353 DISTRIBUTION Docket File 9 RClark Mr. George A. Hunger, Jr.
'M0'Brien '
ETrottier Director-Licensing Local PDR EJordan Philadelphia Electric Company PDI-2 Reading BGrimes Correspondence Control Desk SVarga BBoger P. 0. Box 7520 ACRS (10)
WButler Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
Dear Mr. Hunger:
SUBJECT:
TURBINE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE PROGRAM (TAC N0. 71385)
RE:
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, UNIT 2 Section 3.5.1.3.3 of the Safety Evaluation Report (SER), NUREG-0991, for Limerick Generating Station (LGS) indicates that Philadelphia Electric Company (PEco) should submit "a turbine system maintenance program based on the manufacturer's calculations of missile generation probabilities", for NPC approval. Such a program was submitted for LGS, Unit 1 by your letter of May 26, 1987 and approved by our letter of November 3, 1987. Your letter of August 19, 1988 submitted a similar program for LGS, Unit 2.
As discussed in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, we have completed our review of your proposed program and conclude that the maintenance program described in your submittal is acceptable. We also conclude 1) that you used staff approved methodology to calculate the turbine missile generation probability, which is an important part of the turbine maintenance program, and 2) that the turbine missile generation probability satisfies the staff's turbine reliability criteria as specified in the Limerick SER.
With regard to our Safety Issues Management System (SIMS), the requirement was to submit a program. Even though the related inspection program will continue for the life of the plant, we consider this action item to have been completed with the submittal of an acceptable program.
Sincerely, Original signed by Richard J. Clark Richard J. Clark, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II
' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure:
See next page gol
[LfMELTR]
I PDI-2/PF PDI-2/D i f RClark:
WButler N cf/of /89 g/f/89 8905170178 090509 PDR ADOCK 05000353 A
PNU
, ' - jfI UNITED STATES
- 'n I
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
'g
, j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 May 9, 1989
- sse*
Docket No. 50-353 Mr. George A. Hunger, Jr.
Director-Licensing Philadelphia Electric Company Correspondence Control Desk P. O. Box 7520 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101
Dear Mr. Hunger:
SUBJECT:
TURBINE SYSTEM MAlflTENANCE PROGRAM (TAC NO. 71385)
RE:
LIMERICK GENERATING STATION, VilIT 2 Section 3.5.1.3.3 of the Safety Evaluation Report (SER), NUREG-0991, for Limerick Generating Station (LGS) indicates that Philadelphia Electric Company (PECo) should submit "a turbine system maintenance program based on the manufacturer's calculations of missile generation probabilities", for NRC approval. Such a program was submitted for LGS, Unit 1 by your letter of May 26, 1987 and approved by our letter of November 3,1987 Your letter of August 19, 1988 submitted a similar program for LGS, Unit 2.
As discussed in the enclosed Safety Evaluation, we have completed our review of your proposed program and conclude that the maintenance program described in your submittal is acceptable. We also conclude 1) that you used staff approved methodology 4
to calculate the turbine missile generation probability, which is an important part of the turbine maintenance program, and 2) that the turbine missile generation probability satisfies the staff's turbine reliability criteria as specified in the Limerick SER.
With regerd to our Safety Issues Management System (SIMS), the requirement was to submit a program.
Even though the related inspection program will continue for the life of the plant, we consider this action item to have been completed with the submittal of an acceptable program.
Sincerely, R
J. C, ark, Project Manager Project Directorate I-2 Division of Reactor Projects I/II l
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Enclosure:
Safety Evaluation cc w/ enclosure:
See next page f
Mr'. ' George A. Hunger, Jr.
Limerick Generating Station Philadelphia Electric Company Units 1 & 2 cc:
Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esquire Mr..Ted Ullrich Conner and Wetterhahn Manager - Unit 2 Startup 1747 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W.
Limerick Generating Station Washington, D. C.
20006 P. 0.~ Box A
-Mr. Rod Krich S7-1 Sanatoga, Pennsylvania 19464
. Philadelphia Electric Company Mr. John Doering 2301 Market Street Superintendent-Operations Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Limerick Generating Station P. O. Box A Mr. David Honan N2-1 Sanatoga, Pennsylvania 19464 Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Thomas Gerusky, Director
~
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Bureau of Radiation Protection PA Dept. of Environmental Resources Mr. Graham M. Leitch, Vice President P. O. Box 2063 Limerick Generating Station Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17120 Post Office Box A Sanatoga, Pennsylvania 19464 Single Point of Contact P. O. Box 11880-Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17108-1880
- Mr. James Linville
~
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Mr. _ Philip J. Duca Region I Superintendent-Technical 475 Allendale Road Limerick Generating Station King of Prussia, PA 19406 P. O. Box A Sanatoga, Pennsylvania 19464 Mr. Thomas Kenny Senior Resident Inspector US Nuclear Regulatory Comission P. O. Box 596 Pottstown, Pennsylvania 19464 Mr. Joseph W. Gallagher
-Vice President, Nuclear Services Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 Mr. John S. Kemper Senior Vice President-Nuclear Philadelphia Electric Company 2301 Market Street i
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19101 o
)