ML20246B621
| ML20246B621 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Summer  |
| Issue date: | 08/10/1989 |
| From: | SOUTH CAROLINA ELECTRIC & GAS CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245K022 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8908230412 | |
| Download: ML20246B621 (2) | |
Text
_ _ __
l
~
'.' Attachment I to Document Control Desk Letter
- Aegust 10, 1989 Page 1-of 1 m
t PLANT SYSTEMS
'1 l
3/4.7.R AREA TEMPERATURE MONITORING LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 9
belo#f The temperature of each area shown in Table 3.7-7 shall be maintained
[
3.7 w the limits indicated in Table 3.7-7.
APPLICABILITY: Whenever the equipment in an affected area is required to be OPERAELE.
ACTION:
With one or more areas exceeding the temperature limit (s) shown in Table 3.7-7:
For more than eight hours, prepare and submit a Special Report to a.
the Commission pursuant to Specification 6.9.2 within the next 3Q days providing a record of the amount by which and the cumulative time.the temperature in the affected area exceeded its limit and an analysis to demonstrate the continued OPERABILITY of the affected equipment.
b.
By more than 30'F, in addition to the Special* Report required abo e, within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> either restore the area to below its temperature limit or declare the equipment in the affected area inoperable.
e.
.r:.
i SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 3
4.7.H The temperature in each of the arets of Table 3.7-7 shall be determined I to be within its limit at least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />.
G 6
- l
.g g
g.
P
X ' Attachm:nt II to Document Control Desk Lettcr
- 4i August 10, 1989 Page l'of 1 SAFETY HAZARDS CONSIDERATION' The Commission has provided standards in 10CFR50.92(c) for determining whether a significant hazards consideration exists. A proposed amtndment to an operating license for a facility involves a significant hazards consideration if. operation of the facility in accordance with the proposed.
amendment would not:
(1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; (2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or (3) involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
1.
The proposed amendment does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated because the administrative change does not affect plant operation in any manner.
2.
The proposed amendment does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident than previously evaluated because the proposed change is administrative in nature and no physical alterations of plant configuration or changes to setpoints or operating parameters are proposed.
3.
The proposed amendment does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. The amendment is administrative in nature in that it renumbers Section 3/4.7.11 to 3/4.7.9 to agree with related changes contained within Amendment 79 to the Facility Operating License.
Based on the above reasoning, SCE&G has determined that the proposed amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration.
1
_______________ _ __ _ _ _ ___ -