ML20245K539

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments on Encl to NRC Summarizing Dispute Between Case & Util Re 1982 Cold Hydrostatic Test at Facility & Respective Positions of Case & Util on Three Issues.No Clarifications Suggested
ML20245K539
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak 
Issue date: 06/30/1989
From: Counsil W
TEXAS UTILITIES ELECTRIC CO. (TU ELECTRIC)
To: Charemagne Grimes
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
TXX-89447, NUDOCS 8907050158
Download: ML20245K539 (1)


Text

- _ - _ - _ -

d$

Log # TXY.-89447 y7 File # 10086 1UELECTRIC June 30, 1989 U$5.S"""

U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Christopher I. Grimes, Director Comanche Peak Project Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Washington, D.C.

20555

SUBJECT:

COMANCHE PEAK STEAM ELECTRIC STATION (CPSES)

DOCKET NO. 50-445 DISPUTE BETWEEN CASE AND TV ELECTRIC -

CASE DOCUMENTED REQUEST FOR ACTION REGARDING CPSES UNIT ? 1.982 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS)

COLD HYDROSisilC TEST

Dear Mr. Grimes:

We have reviewed the enclosure to your letter of June 16, 1989, summarizing the NRC staff's understanding of the dispute between CASE and TU Electric regarding the 1982 RCS Cold Hydrostatic Test at CPSES and of the respective positions of CASE and TV Electric on the three issues raised in the dispute.

We believe that the summary generally reflects the principal arguments made by both CASE and TU Electric and do not have any clarifications to suggest.

Very truly yours,

?

Q William G. Counsil DAR/vid c - Mr. R. D. Martin, Region IV Resident Inspectors, CPSES (3)

Ms. J. Ellis l

)

091

\\

9

$$8"2858!83883hs

'!o 2mian 1-.

non.. rmo32m A

PDC