ML20245A923
| ML20245A923 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1989 |
| From: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20245A921 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8906220268 | |
| Download: ML20245A923 (2) | |
Text
.
- * [po nto o
o UNITED STATES
~,h NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- 4 l
WASHING TON, D. C. 20555
%....*/
SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION SUPPORTING AMENDMENT NO.133 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. OPR-71
_AND_ AMENDMENT NO.163 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-62 CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, et al.
BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET N05. 50-325 AND 50-324 r
1.0 INTRODUCTION
By letter dated July 11, 1988, as supplemented April 11, 1989 Carolina Power & Light Compan Specifications (TS) y submitted a request for changes to the Technical for Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2.
The proposed changes would revise:
(1) the titles listed in the index section of the TS to be consistent with the titles shown in the text, and (2) the two titles provided in the text for consistency within TS between the two units. All changes are considered administrative changes.
The April 11, 1989 submittal corrected TS pages to reflect amendments issued since the original July 11, 1988 application. Therefore, the later submittal was not renoticed and the no significant hazards consideration determination published in February 1,1989, was not affected.
2.0 EVALUATION In the July 11, 1988 submittal, the licensee stated that the index for the BSEP TS does not, in all cases, accurately represent the information provided in the text of the document.
In some cases, the titles of the sections are inconsistent; in others, the page numbers are incorrect. The licensee further stated that the changes are purely administrative. There are no changes to the text of the TS. Only the index and two titles in the text are being changed for consistency. There are no modifications or design changes involved. The sole purpose of these requests was to provide consistency between the index section of the TS and the text of the document and to provide consistency between the TS of the two units.
In the April 11, 1989 supplemental submittal, the licensee stated that certain index section pages previously included in the July 11, 1988 l
request no longer require revision due to the issuance of other license amendments since the original submittal.
In addition, several Unit 1 l
l s9062 kh FDR P
%.' '. W j
g J
[
- TS index section pages, which were omitted from the original submittal, were included in the April 11, 1989 submittah The staff reviewed the requests and agreed with the changes proposed by the licensee.
Therefore, based on the above discussion, the NRC staff finds the changes to be acceptable.
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION
S 1
This amendment relates to changes in recordkeeping, or administrative procedures to show the index in all cases to accurately reflect the information provided in the text. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that this amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding.
Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusionsetforthin10CFR51.22(c)(10). Pursuant to 10 CFR.51.22(b),
no environmental frpact statement or environmental assessment need be prepated in connection with the issuance of this amendment.
4.0 CONCLUSION
The Conmission made a proposed determination that this amendment involves l
no significant hazards consideration which was published in-the Federal Register (54 FR 5160) on February 1, 1989, and consulted with the state of North Carolina. No public comments or requests for hearing were received, and the State of North Carolina did not have any comments.
1 The staff has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, j
that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, and (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Com-mission's regulations, and the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety.
of the public.
Principal Contributor:
N. B. Le Dated: June 13,1989 l
l 4p f
_ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - _ _ --