ML20244D708
| ML20244D708 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/26/1986 |
| From: | Partlow J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE) |
| To: | Eisenhut D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20244D710 | List:
|
| References | |
| TAC-52665, NUDOCS 8603040164 | |
| Download: ML20244D708 (2) | |
Text
p Ref. I e
smitge stATss
. /** %
NDCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N
,h
,, mas ctow.o.c.sesu
[
3 j
C/
February 26,19S6 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Deputy Director MEMORANDUM FOR:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation James G. Partlow, Director Division of Inspection Programs FROMi Office of Inspection and Enforcement CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RAT FOR GUIDANCE ON ACCEPTABILITY OF
SUBJECT:
tly there Regional inspection of perfomance of CILRTs t ble to NRR Section !!!.A.3(a) of App. J statesith the prov with respect to 10 CFR ED, Appendix J.
that all CILRTs "...shall be conducted in accordance wAN51 N45.4 provid the American National Standard (ANSI) N45.4 1972...*
h d" and the
- reference-two different test methods which are the
- absolute me In addition, two methods of leak rate computation are ANSI M45.4. These specified for use when perfoming the " absolute method" of vessel method".
ANSI W45.4 also consist of the ' point to point
- and " total time
- methods.
test method used requires CILRT test duration,to be at least 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> for any d
h e the leak rate with the exception of those accepted, abbreviated metho s w er can be accurately dete6nined during the shorter test period.
mputation Currently. licensees are utilizing three different CILRT test co d in ANSI M45.4), a methods which consist of the
- total time" method (specifie l
t EN-TOP-1, shortened time duration method (provided by Sechtel Topica 56.6-1981 which Rev.1), and the " mass point
- method (described in AN51/AN was issued to replace ANSI W45.4).
point
- method to esiculate containment integrated leakage ra hd provides more accurate results than the " total t thod of BN-TO i
i that ir, prove to detemine the integrated lestage rate.' total t'ime* met the accuracy of the test.
ble has been The lack of clear guidance as to which test methods are accep l t here it was most recently demonstrated at the Catawba nu
~
h *mtss point" l time
- method.
computational method but had failed when using the ' tota EU3 Q Q I 6) 99 g
t Darrell G. E'itinhut ctions,IE In order to facilitate the proper performance of CILRT T test methods are headquarters requests clarification as to which CILR considered to be acceptable to NRR.
appreciated.
etnintt stCC SY-gut C. rMLOW James G. Partlow Director j
Division of Inspection Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement Distribution:
DC5 016 CRPB Reading i
DI Reading S.A. McNeil. IE
. L.L. Whet 1er, SE P.F. McKee, IE R.L. Spessard, IE J.G. Partlow, IE E.L. Jordan, !E R.H. Vollmer, IE l
J.M. Taylor, IE 4.M. Chung, R1 H.L. Whitener, RII F.A. Maura, R111 J.I. Tapia, RIV C.A. Clark, RV See previous concurrence)
Concurrence
(*
DCKirkpttrick
- RL5pessard EGCE:DEPER:1E
- PTMcKee
- SAMcNeil:mir *SDRichardson ORPB:D3:1E DD:DI:1E 2/20/80 11/19/85 ORPE:Dh1E ORPB:DI:!E 11/24 12/8/85 11/8/85 JGP w
RL5ptsserd D:DI:
- PFMcKee DD:DI:!E 6
ORPD:DI:1E 2/ /86 2/21/86
~
-~_
~%