ML20244D708

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Clarification as to Acceptable Containment Integrated Leak Rate Test Methods by 860307.Problems Occur When Facilities Pass W/Use of One Method But Fail by Another.Licensees Currently Use Three Computation Methods
ML20244D708
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/26/1986
From: Partlow J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE)
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20244D710 List:
References
TAC-52665, NUDOCS 8603040164
Download: ML20244D708 (2)


Text

p Ref. I e

smitge stATss

. /** %

NDCLEAR REGULATORY COMMIS$10N

,h

,, mas ctow.o.c.sesu

[

3 j

C/

February 26,19S6 Darrell G. Eisenhut, Deputy Director MEMORANDUM FOR:

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation James G. Partlow, Director Division of Inspection Programs FROMi Office of Inspection and Enforcement CONTAINMENT INTEGRATED LEAK RAT FOR GUIDANCE ON ACCEPTABILITY OF

SUBJECT:

tly there Regional inspection of perfomance of CILRTs t ble to NRR Section !!!.A.3(a) of App. J statesith the prov with respect to 10 CFR ED, Appendix J.

that all CILRTs "...shall be conducted in accordance wAN51 N45.4 provid the American National Standard (ANSI) N45.4 1972...*

h d" and the

  • reference-two different test methods which are the
  • absolute me In addition, two methods of leak rate computation are ANSI M45.4. These specified for use when perfoming the " absolute method" of vessel method".

ANSI W45.4 also consist of the ' point to point

  • and " total time
  • methods.

test method used requires CILRT test duration,to be at least 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> for any d

h e the leak rate with the exception of those accepted, abbreviated metho s w er can be accurately dete6nined during the shorter test period.

mputation Currently. licensees are utilizing three different CILRT test co d in ANSI M45.4), a methods which consist of the

  • total time" method (specifie l

t EN-TOP-1, shortened time duration method (provided by Sechtel Topica 56.6-1981 which Rev.1), and the " mass point

  • method (described in AN51/AN was issued to replace ANSI W45.4).

point

  • method to esiculate containment integrated leakage ra hd provides more accurate results than the " total t thod of BN-TO i

i that ir, prove to detemine the integrated lestage rate.' total t'ime* met the accuracy of the test.

ble has been The lack of clear guidance as to which test methods are accep l t here it was most recently demonstrated at the Catawba nu

~

h *mtss point" l time

  • method.

computational method but had failed when using the ' tota EU3 Q Q I 6) 99 g

t Darrell G. E'itinhut ctions,IE In order to facilitate the proper performance of CILRT T test methods are headquarters requests clarification as to which CILR considered to be acceptable to NRR.

appreciated.

etnintt stCC SY-gut C. rMLOW James G. Partlow Director j

Division of Inspection Programs Office of Inspection and Enforcement Distribution:

DC5 016 CRPB Reading i

DI Reading S.A. McNeil. IE

. L.L. Whet 1er, SE P.F. McKee, IE R.L. Spessard, IE J.G. Partlow, IE E.L. Jordan, !E R.H. Vollmer, IE l

J.M. Taylor, IE 4.M. Chung, R1 H.L. Whitener, RII F.A. Maura, R111 J.I. Tapia, RIV C.A. Clark, RV See previous concurrence)

Concurrence

(*

DCKirkpttrick

  • RL5pessard EGCE:DEPER:1E
  • PTMcKee
  • SAMcNeil:mir *SDRichardson ORPB:D3:1E DD:DI:1E 2/20/80 11/19/85 ORPE:Dh1E ORPB:DI:!E 11/24 12/8/85 11/8/85 JGP w

RL5ptsserd D:DI:

  • PFMcKee DD:DI:!E 6

ORPD:DI:1E 2/ /86 2/21/86

~

-~_

~%