ML20237B350

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notice of Nonconformance from Insp on 871005-09. Nonconformances Noted:No Documented Evidence That Survey or Audit Undertaken on Eight Vendors Who Performed Svcs for Energy Svcs Group
ML20237B350
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/15/1987
From:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML20237B329 List:
References
REF-QA-99900317 NUDOCS 8712160208
Download: ML20237B350 (2)


Text

i

. f i

{

APPENDIX 8 Cooper Industries Docket No. 99900317/87-02 NOTICE OF NONCONFORMANCE During an inspection conducted October 5-9, 1987, the implementation of the quality assurance (QA) program at the Energy Services Group (ESG) facility in Grove City, Pennsylvania was reviewed with respect to the manufacture of emergency standby diesel generators for nuclear customers. The applicable QA requirements are Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and ESG's Quality Assurance Manual (QAM), dated June 3, 1987. Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain activities were not conducted in accordance with these requirements. The following nonconformances were identified.

1. The Quality Assurance Program Statement of Authority of the Quality Assurance Manual (QAM-1000-1) states, in part, "This program is designed to implement the requirements of ANSI N45.2...and Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B...."

Criterion VII of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 8 of ANSI N45.2 require that a source inspection or audit be performed on vendors supplying services.

Contrary to the above, there was no documented evidence that a survey or audit had been undertaken on eight vendors who performed services for ESG. The vendors include Dresser Industries, E. J. Daiber, Magnaflux

.. Corporation, Huygen Corporation, Starrett, Edmunds Manufacturing, Page-Wilson, and Automation /Sperry. (87-02-02)

2. The Quality Assurance Program Statement of Authority of the Quality '

Assurance Manual (QAM-1000-1) states, in part, "This program is designed to implement the requirements of ANSI N45.2...and Title 10 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50, Appendix B...."

Criterion IV of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states, in part, "... other requirements...necessary to assure adequate quality are... included or referenced in the documents for procurement of... services...."

Section 5 of the ANSI N45.2 states, in part, "... procurement documents ,

shall require contractors to provide a Quality Assurance Program...."

Contrary to the above, the requirements to have an acceptable QA program were not included or referenced on purchase orders to Dresser Industries (3921B8193), E. J. Daiber (3421B5592), Huygen Corporation (3921B5288),

Starrett (3921B6126), Page-Wilson (3421B5845), and Automation /Sperry (342186047). (87-02-03) 871226020e 871215 PDR QA999 ENVCDIN 99900317 PDR

l 1 3. Criterion I of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 and Section 3 of ANSI N45.2 require that the authority and duties of persons and organizations performing activities affecting quality be established and documented.

Section 2 of ANSI N45.2 states, in part, "The program shall define the organizational structure...and shall clearly delineate the responsibility and authority of the various personnel and organizations involved."

Section 2.1.1 of the Quality Assurance Manual (QAM) dated June 3, 1987, states in part, "The organizational structure, functional responsibilities, level of authority, and lines of communication...are documented."

Section 2.2 of the ESG QAM states, in part " Exhibit 2-1 is an organizational chart illustrating the report structure of the various quality-related personnel."

Contrary to the above, the responsibilities and authority of the field Service Manager and the Site Representatives were not documented in the ESG Nuclear QA Program or identified in Exhibit 2-1. (87-02-04) 4

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ .