ML20236W652
| ML20236W652 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | South Texas  |
| Issue date: | 12/01/1987 |
| From: | EBASCO SERVICES, INC. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236W640 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8712080135 | |
| Download: ML20236W652 (110) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:,- _ . - - - - i l i ( PART C - EBASCO QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION QUALITY ASSURANCE DURING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION l l REVISION 20 i Docomhor 1- 1987 Date i j 87 2Ogg $hh a L__----
>* - .->>..,...+,,e ..s . , a, as:. + . 4n.v . . 1 .a +. ' .,;.'
EBASCO QUALITY ASSURANCE
^
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION PART C e00 CK.:O
, _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ =
Gs ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 SOUTH TEMAS PROJECT
, , . % r., _ _ .a , .% e * .- . 4- * * - ,
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED EBASCO bo WT Me CeNe* New 6 NY 0048-0752 4 Bertrand R. Mazo - Vce Prescent Corporate Quakty Programs FOREWORD This Quality Assurance Program Descript. ion - Part C reflects official Ebasco policy and has been prepared to also reflect the requirements of the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission document 10 CFR 50, Appendix B (18 Quality Assurance Criteria), and American National Standards Institute document N45.2, entitled " Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants." Enclosure " Statement of Authority" dated July 1, 1986 confirms the authority for the establishment of a Quality Assurance Program and a Quality Assurance Program Manual. I
)
The enclosure letter of R H Vollmer to L F C Reichle dated May 12, 1975 is the NRC's acceptance of Ebasco's Quality Assurance Program Manual ; (Ebasco Report ETR-1001, Revision 0, March 14,1975). l The enclosure letter of H J Miller to B R Mazo dated May 1,1987 is the' - NRC's latest acceptance of Ebasco's Quality Assurance Program Manual, l Revision 13. The Ebasco Quality Assurance Program Manual, as modified ! for the South Texas Project, is the basis of this _ Quality Assurance Program i Description; The primary responsibility for overall implementation and administration of the Ebasco Quality Program rests with the Vice President Corporate Quality Programs as delegated to him by the Senior Chairman,' Chairman and President of Ebasco Services Inc. The Director Quality Assurance is assigned the responsibility and authority to enforce Ebasco Quality Program requirements and has the unqualified support of corporate management. His decisions may not be overriden by personnel in any division or department, except with the. written consent of the Vice President Corporate Quality Programs. The Director Quality Assurance shall staff this Project to the extent necessary to perform quality assurance tasks directly and audit departments other than his own in their performance of tasks related to quality assurance. The Director Quality Assurance has the authority to require immediate correction of any nonconforming a,ctivity or. condition to comply with Ebasco Quality Program requiremen,ts, or if necessary, to stop work until suitable corrective action has been taken or a satisfactory resolution reached. W/s u . - June 22,1987
/
, y
;7,g 7 ,, 77 7 - - - , ,, , , , , , , , g , ,,. 7 y n 2-
, ,w l
l~ 1
' ES ASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED EBASCO: .I TwoWorld Trace Ceme' New *:re. N Y 10048 -
1 a j J i l STATEMENT OF AUTHORITY ) d
. j The Management of.EbascoiServices Incorporated recognizes.:
the necessity for,a comprehensive Quality Program.for. j l Nuclear Power Plants. Ebasco Company Procedure No.L N-21' establishes ~ the basic organization, assigns authorities I and_ responsibility for implementing.the Quality Program. and establishes the requirement for a" corporate.. Qual.ity. Assurance Manual. Accordingly, this Manual! represents.- l Ebasco Quality Program policy. 'In'this respect, it'is - ' to be used as a standard by personnel ~in all Ebasco organizational units. ; y l The primary responsibility for overall imp 1'ementation and- { l administration of~the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program i rests'with'the Vice President Corporate' Quality Programs as j l delegated to him by the Senior Chairman, Chairman and .l President. The Quality Program Committee chaired by the; j
. Vice President Corporate Quality. Programs will establish-- 1 Corporate Quality Program policy. This permanent Comittee- I will be comprised of personnel from the various applicable. -)
operational divisions. bQ l A. Scarola R.J. Christesen R.F.' Albosta
/ e'./nior Chairman Chairman President-July 1, 1986-i
.s i
9 1
.r + f p.,,....+ ,4 .<m e p. y * - g b .
. . . . . ':<m . . .*-
- 4. ,. - ,, ,
. . i .. A :
. m_,,,. ' * : ..A . . Z . :g .
,~a *
~
UtstTED sT ATES NUCLE AR REGULATORY COMMtsSION w Asuewetow. o. c. 20555 MAY 12 575 Mr. Leonard 7. C. Reichle Vice President Ebasco Services Incorporated Two Rector Street New York, New York 10006
Dear Mr. Reichle:
We have reviewed and evaluated the Dasco Services Incorporated (EBASCO) ~ Huclear Quality Assurance Program Manual (Ebasco Report ETR-1001, Revision 0, March 14, 1975). We find that it describes an acceptable Quality Assurance-Program for the design, procurement, and construction activities which are within the Dasco scope of work for nuclear power plants. For the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program, applicants need only reference this Topical Report in Section 17 of license applications. ' We do not intend to repeat our review of this Topical Report when it is referenced in' an application. Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusions about this Topical Report are invalidated, we. will notify you. Yon vill. be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire. Please include a copy of this letter and our evaluation in each of the reports and resubmit 70 copies to the NRC. 4 Sinceraly, Richard H. Vollmer, Chief Quality. Assurance Branch j Division of Reactor 1.icensing j
Enclosure:
NRC Topical Report Evaluation of Ebasco Report ITR-1001,Rev. O, 3/14/75 - 1 4
-}
edocutso,*g
+
6 [ s .f D .9916 A w_ _ - _ . . - ---
Q2.1. ~ L ..L: W L . . .: - . ..m, - . , - . ..v . . .. . x . .v. ;< . u. :.. .e s TOPICAI.' REPORT EVALUATION Report Number: ETR-1001, Rev. O, Nonproprietary j Report
Title:
Dasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Report Date: March 14, 1975 Originating Organization: Dasco Services Incorporated ; i Reviewed By: Quality Assurance Branch I
SUMMARY
OF TOPICA1. RIPORT Topical Report ETR-1001, Rav. O describes the Quality Assurance (QA) Program which the Dasco Services Incorporated (Dasco) applies to those ; design, procurement, and construction activities invo?ving safety related I struetures, syste=s, and components of nuclear power plants vithin the j Dasco scope of work. ETR-1001, Rev. O coscits Dasco to comply with i the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CTR Part 50 and to follow the QA I guidance provided by the NRC in: I
- 1. " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During Design and Procurement Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," WASH 1283, Rev.1, May 24, 1974, and l l
i
- 2. " Guidance on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Construction.
Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," WASH 1309, May 10,1974.- ) { 1 Dasco has provided for our evaluation a detailed organizational description of those individuals and groups involved in carrying out activities required by the QA Program and a' delineation of duties, j responsibilities, and authority of those organizational elements involved in the QA Program. ETR-1001, Rev. O contains a description of the measures used to carry out the Dasco QA Program activities and describes how applicable requirements of Appendix B will be satisfied by the administration and implementation of these measures. SUM".ARY 07 RECULATORY EVA1.UATION We have evaluated the QA Program and the organizations responsible for QA functions as described in ETR-1001, Rev. O. We find that QA' policy and direction originate at an acceptably high management level and are af fectively communicated to other parts of the. organization. Those performing QA functions have responsibility and authority commensurate with their duties in implementing the QA Program. We also find that measures have been established, to be implemented by written procedures and instructions, which address each of the criteria of Appendix B and demonstrate conformance with each criterion. Based on our review and evaluation of ITR-1001, Rev. O we conclude that:
- 1. The organizations and persons performing QA functions within Dasco have the required independence and authority to ef f ectively carry out the QA Program without reservation or undue influence fron those directly e
e
[ TL ~ , . : &...e ,. ;n.L.C u :.. . s.a. :a w . - r . . ... .. , , , e in. ....<a..... responsible for costs and schedules, and .
- 2. The Dasco QA Program contains the necessary requirements, procedures, and controls to demonstrate that quality-related activities will be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Appendix B to 10 CTR Part 50.
REGUI.ATORY POSITION' It is the staff's position that the B sco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual (Dasco Report ETR-1001, Revision 0, March.14,1975) . is acceptable - for 'use in the design, procurement, and construction 'of nuclear power plants. The Topical Report.can be referenced'by report n e ber in Section 17 of future Safety Analysis Reports. o 9 e I l I L , .
TZ . .l.. - [~ %M a.s.A 1 ': ' . , w .t . TR O - /A sc. . . .
. x . E .'.1. '!
7 ,petetuq'o_. UNITED STATES 8 ' N ., , g ,7. ' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E, - I wassiNcios, p. c. 20s55 - s,* m....f MAY 1 887 Docket No. 99900505 Mr. Bertrand R. Mazo, Vice President Corporate Quality Programs Ebasco Services Incorporated. Two World Trade Center 4 New York, NY 10048-0752 -!
Dear Mr. Mazo:
SUBJECT:
NRC ACCEPTANCE OF EBASCO QA TOPICAL REPORT We have completed our review of the proposed Revision 13 to the Ebasco quality assurance topical report, ETR-1001, " Nuclear' Quality Assurance Program Manual." Proposed Revision '13 was submitted with your letter of December 29, 1986; and, in response to staff questions of February 17, 1987, modified by Ebasco letter dated March 17, 1987. This revision updates the topical report to reflect organizational changes, to reflect changes to the QA program to accommodate the organizational changes, to update Regulatory Guide commitments, and to make other changes of an' editorial nature. Based on our review of the changes' proposed in Revision 13, we find that the . revised topical report continues to meet the criteria of Appendix B-to 10 CFR-Part 50 and is, therefore, acceptable. Should regulatory criteria or regulations change such that our conclusion regarding this report is. invalidated, we will notify you. You will be given the opportunity to revise and resubmit it should you so desire. Changes to the QA topical' report should be reported to the NRC. in accordance with the provisions fer holders of' construction permits as described in 10 CFR 50.55(f)(3) except that the second copy of the submittal should go to the Quality Assurance Branch, Division of Licensee Performance and Quality Evaluation, NRR, U.S. NRC, Washington, D.C. 20555'(instead of to the NRC Vendor Program Branch). To use this topical report in future nuclear. power plant license applications, you need only to have it referenced in Section 17 of the SAR. Should it be ' referenced in an SAR for a new facility, the basis of our evaluation.will be the acceptance criteria in the latest revision of.the Standard Review. Plan Section 17.1 (currently Revision 2). Appropriate changes may be necessary at that time. i O
[ -. . .. . . . . . . . ;h ..: L .- T., - ~~ - a n s+v.i . . + . . u .%
.m - . . . .a ~ . ;v . 2 4a..i.. }
a.
,(.
Bertrand R. Hazo - 2.- '!
- Please replace our previous. acceptance letter with a copy of this letter, identify the report as Revision.13 of ETR;1001, and forward seven copies to- -
the Document Control Desk, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington,: D.C. 20555. ' Sincerely. - Hu t J. Miller,' Acting Director E Division of Licensee Performance'and: Quality Evaluation . Office of Nuclear Reactor. Regulation =. 4 g
-l' e' ..m- e +e -g 8
-___.m__...__._ . _ . . _ . _ _
Q mg .02
.m ; c -
- u. Af.../ NN/A@ b,MM55U'5MN2bk,a { 3 A dd I MM' , -
,z '
q.... . m'
- w. - -
a h4kh y w+ ' hMm! E -n ' p-4 ,
.. o - , - , .: .. .
1
.$109 2ttSTPl4 45 !
, PAGE
{ f ob t HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY ; ,h # 5
' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT F ..
SECTIC [" W 1 ERASCO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2. t , J:
\ 4 Il INCORPORATED.
4 M MME PRMM DMM r PW O U [i
. Revistan- 20.
TABI.E OF CONTENTS: nY Date -8/28/87- .gy
* ?- '
c a,
- : .- { h y,y/T' W m ym-a
' . ' ' -!y 7
7 -- PART I - General i'. 3- f[- 1
'! n .
Section - : Title = ' 4 :W 4 '
.7
- e 1
. '.:Q QA-I-1. Quality Assurance Prograa ' '
, : a blR20 ~ o
' i
.QA-I-2 Organization and Responsibilities '
~ t i
'lR20Kl QA-I-3.
~
Pareonne1 Indoctrination'aad Training '
, .( -
._ .]y Program in Quality ' Assurance - 1 '
llR20 j
.I.
- LP. "s QA-I-4 Deleted'(not applicable) ~
.r QA-I-5 Deleted (not applicable)'
s , l QA-I-6 Quality As'surance Records.
;{ ; lR20 q
.4 PART II - Engineering Offices 3 l' . _.
Deleted (not applicable) [
-jip' PART III - Construction Site M? ( '
Section Title t.- . l \ '. QA-III-1 Instructions, Procedures, and ' Drawings - s f E( p .lR20i
=
h c
. ( '. 4 3 .: ' ... -
QA-III-2 Document control / ~ si' c.- ] R20
+ .
)
QA-III-3 Deleted (not applicable) ', h:j ph
\
QA-III-4 Deleted (not applicable) (
,. W ,
f f 5) "l u
' 1 /. . ..
QA-III-5 Deleted (not applicable) . i
.c e QA-III-6 Nonconformances lR20 9 a;
QA-III-7 Corrective Action p p' Uj15.20; c. F fa "? H h.. v ./ l! 1
' j -r>
Copyright c
,y l 1987 Ebasco Services : Incorporated: - ' : (O
\1 .j 4- ,d 1075d 7.o
, Q, M yy d:
.i e v. .m m+. :Q y,-: 48 ~ -
jb ft 1
~~TEXC5%.:5L:.a
,,,w vc m lFDil2N]N%NWQ:%$i;%W
.w.. r.,
' m 3 . ~ y\. A . .' ,
%hi"?'
y;;- f' .(hr"'*%Y ^ O
- :]1 - '
;M '
'! :y' ., %
eioessim.as . [. . , . (M' o,;.2[
.. . ~r. Q"" ' ~
3:,e g J2 . '
- l. _
f W6,ousTon"uoM hf wo PowiicoMPANy.'
~
IEC1)DC f $00T : TEXA5 PRfMECT ELECTRIC GEf j MTING $TtOL UNITS 1 & 2' o ,
'W%
- ESA5CO mconeonAvro -
SERylCES.$.< "
" dAUTY AS$URANCE PROGRAN DESC TNW -GART . . CT i j-. . ... .
TABLE
.g , g ,g,g , 4
. 20 L ~ " %{lh f up OF CQlR*JNTg!'., q~ Date;J,/ '
4d i"' 8/28/87<1 m w m ;;,f,t;-)l + 9 sfe
... ?'T
- m
,, y l$ h '
;4 .+ g ._
s
. v' .
?
PARTUII - Construction Stie TCont'dl M . Pqo L lq y ' 1 g%> -..<' _itetion ..6#r .1'itio o
.QA-III-8 % Control!o se fal Processesi 'II *
( , '-lR20 2 .
.. (
QA-III-9 Quality Assurance Au'dits! l # y ' lR2'0 "
- ,j A ,l e s ,
, :,y ~
c.n QA-Ill-10 4i identification 'and control of Items.1
' lR20; m p s a
.QAsffall
-Imptetton -
G,
~ lR20 '1 ,
; ri ' t, > -
. n
.{" ,
QA-III-12 Test ControJ,- c '.. .. ;lR20
,o t
- f, ,
QA-III-13 control 41pesuring'andTesting. l' .t i Equipment / t i >.
-\ '
- lR20L QA-III-14 Control of. Rheiving,Jandling, and .,
Storag'e ^ lR2 0
.)
y . I QA-III-15 4 / Inspect.'rn, Test, and Operating Statt.s" e ,
- lR20 ;
1 h ,b' )
.b k '
jfxendixI 4 Teras and Deitettions.
,lR20 f1endixII '
Ebasco Exceptions ,to- US Nuclear '. . , 164 ulatory Guides and ANSI Standards k I;\ / ^ d 4 f\
\ f6 Q$dicatt;d in'Secti,on QA-I-in 1 l u ji- ;
-lR29 V i
e , y .,
)
)
~
> < r
/f '
,c 4,c- , -
.p Q q
./h
,/
/
f 1 i
>y ,
,a f.\ 'h' , ./ . r n
j 3 , 'l-) y j L s' . . \)> .\ y l
, '),
p/ '/- -) *
>w yf [ a. . . ( m, ,
Q'y- , f L ; t , (
;9 4 ,. - y ./
c, .
-e 3 xt .
; t ~%, .,j s '
,,u .
f y .,
- f. .
~
. 4
(- r ' ol> y' r
'.t' >
4 ,( > i s *- ' q
.g a A @%q .
.t .
4
).
? _, y cpy right c 1987 Ebape Services; Int;orpobte:dl
'E r w. k w Y' fb%
l
.m . ;. C. - -
- w. e - -
~ m - a
DL: : .. , , i. 4 a :L ,; > .p . 5: k 30 G595;&&d&MD T5O?l:b % j >
;tf
.e.
, , -i ,, . q [. % h. ;.
;iL b _b
+
jb '# D jv '
' 's tos-a ttstru4s; . , ,
. 'A pagz [ .or g
)
's
-f i/ a ' HMTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY n > l) SE CTICH .
'e 'I, L. . SOUTH TDA3 MJECT #
4
'l '
ELECTMC GENFJtArtNC, ATION UNITS 1 A. 7, EB.h'500 SERVICt!- ggg ggg ggg ,.,,,W C m inconeonArzoa jA t -7 3QA-I y ,e QUALITY ASS {,2ANCE PROGRAM 7 ,' e! o , ,
~
s .q p (
,, u. .
> 3 -. q
' t i,c 1.0 StlDPE l "
y
,1 y {
3 The purpose c/,this (e,ction is tu describe ~the Quality Assurance Program of S 8 Ebas..o Services Incorporated and itt applicability co : safety-related t y activitias and .servyes performed by 2basco in the construction of. the ' '? South Texas Proletr..' ' 71 tis. progras basibeen designed to meet the, applicable
~4~
requirements of the Unfted States kilear Regulatory Commissio9 8 Quality.L ' Assurance Criteria cV10 Cat' 50, Apphndir B. The program als'o' conimits to / , l[ comply with the Quality Asakrance'rlejuireme'nts oF ehe ASME' Boiler an6 lR20: Pressure Vessel e de Section III for. Items covt <A by the Code.: . It has also : l f been des.tgned n ..t N4 regulatory /posJ tion of de;following USNRC 9 egulatory : I Guides awi AV5I, Standards, ith excepticds and cI. deifications as stated in Appendix lII 6f this hinualf Standard h ] , l 4 Title , ANSI N45.2-1971 , Quality' Assurance Program-R.G. 1.28 (Rev. O, 6/72) ': Requirements for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N45.2.1-1973 , Cleaning ^of Fluid Systems and-R,.G. 1.37 (Re v. O, 3/73) Associated Components During - (3em Appendix II.Hotes 3 throupt 3) ' Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N45.2.2-197'! Packaging , Shipping, l Receiving. R.G.1.38 (Rev. O, 3/73) Storage, and Handling of Items (See Appendix II Notes 6 through 11) for Nuclear Power Plants (During
,, the Construction. Phase)-
l ANSI N45.2.3-1?/3 Housekeeping During the-R.G.1.39 (Rev. O, 3/73 ? _' construction-Phase of Nuclear. (See Appendit'II Notes 12 and 13) Power Plants ANS1 M$.2.44.972 Insts11ation, Inspect $on, and R.G. 1.30 (Rev. O, 8/72) Testlng Requirements for (See Appendix II Notes 14 and 15) Instrumentation and Electric Equipment During the Construction of Nuclear Power CAngrating -
' Stations ,..
l ARSI N45.2.5-1974 Supplementary Quility Assurance (See Appendix II Notes 1 and 2) Requirements fer" Installation, Inspection, and ' Testing - of Structural Concrete andi Structural Steel During the
, Construction Phase'of Nuclear- *
. Power Plants 1 g I e 1075d 4 M
7 ,
/- p; ij's
', :l. - ' ' 0 (' *
, a t
[
. . m.. ,_ f ..iT Ch ' _j. .m 1.? JE % ca - ir C sies.a usrpms pace 2 or 20 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY I S E CTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EB45CO SEmcE5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 51 & 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA~I-l l>4 Co R Po R A T E D )
i QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM j 1 Standard Title ANSI N45.2.6-1973 Qualifications of Inspection, R.G. 1.58 (Rev. O, 8/73) Examination, and Testing As Modified by Positions C.5, C.6, Personnel for the Construction , C.7, C.8, and C.10 of Rev.1 Phase of Nuclear Power Plants '{ (See Appendix II Note 24) i ANSI N45.2.8-1975 Supplementary - Quality Assurance R.G. 1.116 (6/76) Requirements for Installation, l (See Appendix II Notes 16 through 18) Inspection, and Testing of l Mechanical Equipment and Systems j for the Construction Phase of ) Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N45.2.9-1974 Requirements for Collection, Storage, R.G. 1.88 (Rev. 2, 10/76) and Maintenance of Quality Assurance (See Appendix II Notes 19 through 21) Records for Nuclear Power Plants ANSI N45.2.10-1973 Quality Assurance Terms and R.G. 1.74 (hev. O, 2/74) Definitions l ANSI N45.2.12-1977 Requirements for Auditing of Quality R.G. 1.144 (Rev. 1, 9/80) Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power (See Appendix II Notes 22 and 23) Plants ANSI N45.2.23-1978 Qualification of Quality Assurance R.G. 1.146 (Rev. O, 8/80) Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants Table I-1.1 provides a matrix which shows the sections of the Ebasco Nuclear < Quality Assurance Program Manual that correspond to the requirements of 10 CFR 50, Appendix B and USNRC Regulatory Guide 1.28, Rev. O. The Ebasco Quality Assurance Program is comprised of: The Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual, the Ebasco Quality Assurance Manual - ASME Section lR20 i III, written corporate policies, procedures, departmental instructions, . and I other site-specific documents related to quality. Table I-1.2 provides a matrix of the principal implementing procedures as they relate to 10 CFR 50, Appendix B criteria. Table I-1.3 is a listing of these procedures by title. , The principal implementing procedures are not necessarily limited to those I indicated in the matrix. Implementing procedures will be issued for South ! Texas Project use as the need for specific procedures arises due to changes in i scope of Ebasco safety-related activities. i 1 1 1075d ___.____.___...m. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
,. :. L.= s c . XLL.-. . :q L 7 '. .. .a M J '. . ..J .......;.. M:c.. .a . ." <.. . m , 41094f tSTDk3-05 20 PAGE oF HOUSTON UGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
-{
EBA5CO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2. , INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-I-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM j I
~ ,
The Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual has been designed to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.34(7) for a _ quality assurance program l description. It will be incorporated into applicable portions of Houston j Lighting & Power Company safety analysis reports in whole or by reference as { provided by 10 CFR 50.32. l The Ebasco Quality Program for the South Texas Project is in force at the i Ebasco home office and Construction operations. The Ebasco home office is an i organized unit where project-related support functions are performed. Construction operations encompass those activities related to the construction of the nuclear power station. Ebasco's responsibility for l implementing the Ebasco Quality Program shall begin at the. commencement of activities affecting quality and shall end with the turnover of completed systems to the Client or his designee. Definitions pertaining to the Ebasco Quality Prog. ram are listed in Appendix I of this Manual. 2.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATION For the South Texas Project, the Ebasco Site Quality Assurance organization's I responsibilities are limited to those Quality Assurance functions performed I under Ebasco's ASME Certificate of Authorization, as well as home office and lR20 site Quality Assurance activities as defined herein. Other Quality Assurance I functions are the responsibility of the Client or his designee in accordance I with their respective Quality Assurance programs. l 3.0 QUALITY PROGRAM COMMITTEE 3.1 The Ebasco Quality Program Committee is responsible for and has authority to make and approve procedures for any changes to this Manual. This committee is comprised of personnel from the various applicable operational divisions within Ebasco Services Inc. These people are appointed by officers of Ebasco Services Inc. from the respective organizational divisions. The Vice President Corporate Quality Programs is designated by the Senior Chaiman, Chairman and President of Ebasco Services Inc. as the Chairman of the Quality Program Committee. A member of the Quality Assurance organization shall be designated by the Chairman as Quality Program - Coordinator, whc shall function as the Quality Program Committee's secretary and be a member of the Committee. l The Director Quality Assurance is designated by the Vice President Corporate Quality Programs as a permanent representative of Corporate Quality Programs on the Quality Program Committee. 1075d
)
l l
- n; ~"
. =; .
--- f-h4W ? 5 l
..2 ,
' - 7
. ~. . - - ' ~
- s we.ms ma.es - '
,,a, 4 , 20 s I
HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY - SOUTH TEXA3 PROJECT $ECTION - EBASCO SERVICES LECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 7 { 1 INCORPORATED QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ,- PART C
.QA'I -
s QUALITY ASSURANCE; PROGRAM l
]
1 The Committee shall be
- esponsible for and shall have authority to wake any changes to the policies.and procedures of the Ebasco Qualityf Program. All changes or revisions to the Ebasco. Nuclear Quality , a Assurance Program Manual shall- be processed through the' Quality Program '
Committee by the Quality Program Coordinator. , . 3.2- Ebasco Quality Program Procedures document the various significant activities of the Quality Program that'are the ' direct responsibility of 'l the Quality Program Committee or the. Quality Program Coordinator. These- s procedures include but are not limited to.the following: l 3.2.1 Quality Program Procedure No.~ 4 entit3.ed,- QUALITY PROGRAM l
' COORDINATOR - DESCRIPTION. OF POSITION, . DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES. j 3.2.2 Quality Program Procedure No. 5 entitled,- DEVIATING FROM-THE CORPORATE EBASCO NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM This MANUAL.
provides for control of such deviations by requiring execution of 'an 1 authorization form involving approval of specified authorities to assure, among other things, that safety and/or' quality will not be ) sacrificed. ' j 3.2.3 Quality Program Procedure No. 6 entitled,' ASSIGNMENT, DISTRIBUTI.ON PROGRAM MANUAL. AND CONTROL OF THE EBASCO NUCLEAR QUALITY AS 3.2.4 ! Quality Program Procedure No. 7 entitled, REVISIONS TO THE q EBASCO NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE: PROGRAM MANUAL. ' j 4.0 GENERAL 1 4.1 Section QA-I-2 describes the organizational structure, functional ~ responsibilities, levels of authority, and lines of internal and external communication for management, direction, and; execution of the Ebasco l Quality Assurance Program. j By the Statement of' Authority at the front of ! this Manual Ebasco's Senior Chairman, Chairman and' President mandates . ' the use of this Manual and its supporting documents which make up the Ebasco Quality Program for the South Texas Project. ' 4.2 It shall be the responsibility of each Ebasco department and the - individual this Program. personnel of that department to adhere.to the requirements of.. 1 Section QA-III-1-requires these departments to develop and- ' control Ebasco instructions, procedures, and/or drawings which describe the manner in which activities affecting qualityJare to be accomplished.. j i 1075d . l
, ~
____-------.-~-m-
CML. . i :: .u..; ., i Z.". .. lEm . w h y A M W _.m it ...2.. . - . u 4 C1.d.5.a. 2 l
.. , 1 nos.msTracs pace 5 ,, M HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBASCO SERMEs ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 -
INCORPORATED QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-I-1 l
.j .
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM When documented evidence is required for the satisfactory performance of these activities, checklists, forms, and/or other appropriate means shall provide this evidence. The documents which contain the procedures listed ) in Table I-1.3 and are used to implement the Ebasco QA Program are: 1 l 4.2.1 Quality Assurance Proc'edures Manual for South Texas Project { 4.2.2 Standard Quality Assurance Procedures for the South Texas l Project 4.2.3 Quality Program Procedures Manual i 4.2.4 Company Procedures Manual - Nuclear 1 4.2.5 Quality Control Procedures Manual for South Texas Project 4.2.6 Site Quality Assurance Instructions Manual for ( South Texas Project { 4.2.7 Construction Procedures Manual - Administrative Site Procedures for South Texas Project
- 4.2.8 Construction Procedures Manual - Construction Site Procedures for South Texas Project 4.2.9 Standard Site Procedures for the South Texas Project The above-listed manuals may also contal: Departmental working procedures which do not describe activities affecting quality and therefore are not l
governed by the requirements of this Manual. Furthermore, certain i l implementing procedures may require changes in order to suit unique I client requirements; such procedures for the South Texas Project will be included in a project manual of' procedures and/or a site manual. In this ' case, the changed procedure shall be designated a Project Procedure, i These procedures will be subject to controls similar to those applicable i to the original documents. i l 4.3 In addition to the requirements of Section QA-III-1 and Paragraph f' l 4.2 above, Section QA-III-8 further assures control over quality-related ! activities by requiring that special processes shall be performed in accordan'ce with written qualified procedures,-and that they shall be f 1075d
. '- lvh32 L .. . : ? Z.:.1.' ~'2h ..J. . %
2 .' a. . = . , .- ' .: T siemestro as i
.occe 6 or 20 HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION
$0UTH TEXAS PROJECT EBA5CO SENCE5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2
-{
mcomponaveo QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C i QA-I-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM performed only by qualified personnel. All qualifications shall be in ; accordance with applicable codes, standards, specifications, and other j requirements as applicable. The Ebasco Quality Program provides for the vez:ification of quality. requirements through written policies, procedures, and instmetions for the performance of inspa.ctions and tests. These inspections and tests are performed on services provided by-Ebasco. All inspections shall be performed by individuals other than s those who performed the activity. !
-}
5.0 INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING 1 j 1 ( Section -QA-I-3 provides for the company-wide-indoctrination.and training of l Ebasco personnel engaged in activities subject to the requirements of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program. The objectives of the training program are !' to familiarize applicable Ebasco personnel with this Quality Assurance Program Manual and the implementing procedures identiff ed in Table I-1,3. Overall responsibility for training as delineated in Section QA-I-3 rests with the Quality Assurance organization. 6.0 REVIEW OF QUALITY PROGRAM ADEQUACY ! 6.1 Ibe adequacy of the Ebasco Quality Program is reviewed on a reguint basis. The determination of program adequacy is based on audit results and trend analyses. Section QA-III-9 provides for the performance and follow-up of audits. lR20 6.2 Audits performed by home office Quality Assurance Engineering are lR20 designed to evaluate the site Quality Program effectiveness on a project I basis. When corrective action is necessary, re-audits are scheduled to assure implementation of corrective action. Section QA-III-9 defines review activities and reports involved in the auditing function. 6>3 Information on audits performed by home office Quality Assurance Engineering shall be submitted to the Client, who is responsible for the lR20 performance of quality trend analysis specific to' the South Texas Project. The Client is responsible for analysis of the available quality lR20 data with respect to quality trends and provides a report to the I appropriate Ebasco executive level of management for review and assessment. The Quality Program Site Manager, the Director Quality l Assurance, or the Vice President Corporate Quality Programs, as applicable, shall be responsible for initiating the implementation of any changes or corrective action deemed necessary to improve the effectiveness of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program. l
~
1075d - L_ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _ _.
;.ma:41.;p w.: 1ph:a.i.iM Dpi.[L4.LX.;4'AMQQ.J:.'uMWIG:!:Ji;Tii.F Md M.'
a., s o, a. . .y, ;< ,. . . ...,,,., ,- , , sies.$rme.es - l enor 7 ' 2'O
,e,-
, , HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY '
$ECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT '
EBASCO SENCEs ' ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 INCoRPoMATaD QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .- PART C? .QA-Il l
. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM' l
k
; TABLE I-1.1: H
' MATRIX OF: COMPLIANCE TO USNRC 10 CFR 50 APPENDIX B' AND ANSI N45.2 -
'10 CFR.50 .- ANS' I N45.2 : . -
,Ebasco Nuclear' Quality, Assurance m Appendix'B' Criteria Paragraph '
Program Manual'Section.
. I. 3. QA-I-2 :-
'II .2 . QA-I-1, QA-I-3 :-
~
III. 4 Not Applicable.to Ebasco.STP Work Scope.- IV 5 ' Not ' Applicable to Ebasco STPI Work Scope V 6 QA-III-1 VI' 7 QA-III-2
.VII , 8- Not. Applicable. to Ebasco SNP Work Scope , VIII 9 . QA-III IX 10- QA-III-8 X 11 :.QA-III-11 XI 12 QA-III-12 III 13 QA-III-13 XIII 14 -QA-III-14 XIV 15 QA-III-15 XV 16' QA-III XVI 17 . QA-III-7 -
i XVII 18 QA-I-6 XVIII- 19 QA-III-9 1075d
' " ~ ~
b______1__Tl___I_ =_-----_
-gc ., .x --
,.,..v~7,w-J .u
-4 7 ~% , t q.y./o u,---- - , , ,
,+ ,'.t i 1.a...w P.7;; g. , - m**..._..ais.p.u d Awat.s , ,
.4.** a_.c . < . '..#. 4 5 - . .
...<.,.t.L., i.s
~
- ) ,
.y s e t o
8 . 20' 5109 21(STP)4 85 PAGE OF HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION j SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2
' EBA5CO SERVICE 5 INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C ' QA-I-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM
= i
.- J .aJ: Y.da;; ~a '. ; e na
- 1. . .
. : yf T *777 0777777
- T 7 '. f 7, 7 l R20 5$ fiY iiiYhk
^
if i i i.Y l i 5'Y ? Ei 9 19 Eiiii. Eiiiiiii E Y, i Ei E9 i . l' I
- 1.
D: [
- 7 o Egg T7
** l
$^ .
Y.-
=
4* 3:a
*e 8-
[.. i J. . 7 J =.t 'J e
! E3 a.
E 77.E Ti ? 7 77 7 m. C
':i = R20-o :! : . ,
8 : :- a ~
. {
7 g t
- t. .*. .1 7. a'. n 3% j. : V5 7 77 1 7 7 1 i j 3
. i l
I
$2 1 y 2: .
s gI
-- T :21
- s ec 4:::a
- sg v
v
~
v v
~
as:n-
- n -
EE . : . .- 4 i I g ran- y p. . .
- 14 a
. 1 *: Ma Y. .3 1 5 ja8S 4: Y Y
~
v "v"7 aa vv 9 **1 v fty i m
]
~ . 4 8 . s . .
m D :: =~ ~ a ~
;ii[e t:* G ?? ??
a si di
?
a
?
i a ~ ei T l
<a e vt ?? V .t V V t v
~
; R20 t ....
8 % 47777 12 J ! men n. , Aaags s': 05 ,; 7 7: l
- v;1 t t* --: 9.9t.v
< a.: 7:e a. .l.
6 6.w. g J. ~. 1 ". O. *AIAA 8* 1
~
,. I 7 7 f f 772 .@o@v T ? 43 7,e 7 77 7 l hs !
i i h h le 8 - t SE : . :E : . EE E'm E E' E 1075d w-~__-..---_. . - . - . - _ _ .---_ _ - _ -
3." ., ~. ,7
- Cj3.- QL2,1~ d,%, Ic :n ;,ZZ"Gj,c, Q;5L 23,;~, ~ ,;;T .O
, ,,,, , , . 7- 1., ,, ~ ,,, ;
'c
' - stos attstowge 9 '
of"20 HOUSTON L'lGHTING AND POWER COMPANY : ' 3"ECT10N ' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBASCO SERVICES - ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT $ 1 & 2 - mcompon4Teo . QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C
-Q4-I-1.
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM TABLE I-1.3 ' - PRINCIPAL IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES Procedure c No. Title NUCLEAR PROCEDURES-(N) N-21 Nuclear Quality Program Authorization. and' Implementation N-23 Reporting a. Defect / Noncompliance to- the NRC ' N Ebasco Macagement Quality Assurance Audit ' Committee QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES (QCP, NDE, AND OC) l QCP-1.1 Quality Control Organization and Responsibilities QCP-2.1* Indoctrination, Training and Qualification of .
, Quality Control Personnel to ANSI.N45.2.6 and ASME-Section III, Division 2 Requirements l QCP-6.1 Preparation, Review and Approval'of Quality 1
Control Procedures QCP-6.2 Document Control QCP-6.3 Quality Control Review of Incoming Revisions / Changes to Bechtel Specifications and Procedures QCP-10.1 Cadweld Inspection-1075d L l'
--_-~--A
~
.... 3.31 .L.x : ua :+2D v.. . . . w. :.L' 77 ; . ; -. .:.- . . .D esos.aitswo.as ' no,10 o, 20 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY S E CTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBASCO SERVICE 5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 51 & 2 iwcomponATao QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-I-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM f Procedure No. Title QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES (Cont'd)
QCP-10.2 Preplacemerit Concrete Inspection QCP-10.3 Concrete Placement Inspection QCP-10. 4 Concrete and Field Mixed Grout Post-Placement Inspection QCP-10. 8 Protective Coatings Inspection QCP-10. 9 General Inspection QCP-10.10 Soils Inspection QCP-10.20 Electrical Penetration Installation Inspection QCP-10. 22 Receipt Inspection QCP-10.25 Inspection of Bending and Fabrication of ^ Reinforcing Steel QCP-10.27 Modification / Removal Control Procedure QCP-10. 28 Control of Inspection Stamps QCP-12.1 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment QCP-13.1 Storage and Maintenance Inspection / Verification QCP-13. 2 Verification of Rigging and Handling Activities QCP-13.3 Housekeeping inspections I l 1075d ___ _ _ a
MC_ .2ffi' T. n. '. . , . ic. . .; .t a.;.IQ.:1;f; 12g5EE?.42 ; Md;. :L n e.. c .: .;:.. . .ca A. .. Z : ...
.. , e .-
11 20 6109 21tSTP)4-85 Pact op HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION
- SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 '
EBASCO SERVICES INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-I-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Procedure No. Title QUALITY CONTROL PROCEDURES (Cont'd) lR20 QCP-17.1 Quality Assurance Records NDE-002-1 Radiographic Standards for Welds and Components
'NDE-002-4 Radiographic Standards for Welder's Qualification I (ASME IX) .
NDE-002-5 Radiographic Standards for Welder's Qualification (AWS D.1) NDE-005-1 Ultrasonic Examination (Thickness Measurement) ] 1 NDE-005-2 Ultrasonic Examination of Pipe Welds and Components l l NDE-005-3 Ultrasonic Examination of Structural Welds l NDE-006-1 Liquid Penetrant Examination Procedure l NDE-007-1 Magnetic Particle Examination Procedure l 1 l NDE-009-1 Visual Examination of NF Welds and Threaded Rod QC-0003 Preparation, Control and Distribution of NDE Procedures for the South Texas Project i 1 l l 6 e
- 1075d .
w u___- _ _ . _ __ m _ _ . _ A
y,24' _2; SAD JJUi._J.3FyJg..+@c, da ' Q, :NLEM.ugdsal .1
~
,".. :I.71 2 Rgr 4 F
, . , , . ,4 s
. o - - -
1 ' g d'.
. s ios.a nsTr u.as '
",we'12i ,,120 - >
. HOUSTON LtGHTlhG AND POWER COMPANY .
SE CTION , SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EB A5CO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS I & 2 - WCoRPORATED QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C
. kk.I"1' QUALITY ASSURANCE; PROGRAM-
,U' Procedure ~
N o .' '
; Title; .i SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE INSTRUCTIONS(' QAI)
]
QAI-001 . Site QA Organir.ation and Responsibilities J
]
i
, QAI-002 Preparation, Review, Distribution and Contro1 ~of: !
L L Supplements to Quality Assurance Procedures : > j l'
.1 QAI-004. - Issuance andlProcessing.of Nonconformance Reports: '
j QAI-005 Review and , Approval of Quality Control,c Construction, and Site Procedures' QAI-006 Audit of Ebasco Site Organization lby the Client, Bechtel, - Ebasco Home 0ffice, Code, or- Regulatory 3 Agency ' QAl-007 Reportable Deficiencies i QAI-010 - Site Quality Assurance -Records. l R20 - QAI-014 ' Quality Assurance Review.of Radiograph's QAI-017 -QA Review of Incoming Revisions to Bechtel and. ; Houston Lighting & Power QA Program Documents -
.i QAI-018 Quality Assurance Indoctrination and Training Program QAI-020 Training, Examination and Certification of NDE--
Personnel i = l.. QAI-021 Allegation Investigation i 1
,l l
l
-- 1075d:
o.
,4.
5 _ .____._._.m- _ _ . _ 2--- - -
yng7g;,ggi;[p?M;Qgf;Q-JA..~;y;MCj?.'L,ssemawSiGyylf,WM c ' *
,. ; . , .y. - ,. f , , - -. q + , s
,1 -
- df;J 22]l -
)
sise.nesreus i .c
'. .. og 13i ;ob20.5
. y
, HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWE8t COMPANY
$E CTION ' ' '
J SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT - , . EBASCO SEMICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 - d ' QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C - inconconAtso @.-I-1.
-QUALITY' ASSURANCE PROGRAM .e Procedure-No. Title-SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE = INSTRUCTIONS (Cont'd) ' ,)
~
QAI-022 Quality, Assurance Instructions i 1 [ .QAI-023 Planning of Site Quality Assurance Engineering Activities. , QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDUREG'(QA)
}
QA-G.1 ' Preparation and Control of Quality asurance' - Procedures QA-G.2 Control and Distribution of Project-RelatedlMinuals I f
-)
QA-G.3 Qualification of.-QA. Audit Personnel QA-G.3.1 -Qualification of Inspection,~ Examination and; Testing Personnel. 4 QA-G.3.2 ' Qualification of Corporate Level III'and. l Designated Level III Individuals i QA-G.4 Quality Assurance Records' QA-D.4 Resolution of External Audit Findings- 4 QA-D.5 (STP) Internal Audits i l STANDARD QUALITY ASSURANCE PROCEDURES (SQAP) ' SQAP-01 Generation and Control. of Standard Quality Assurance Procedures SQAP-02 Deficiency . Reporting ; SQAP-03 Project Audits SQAP-04 Project Surveillanees- ; 1 l . l 1075d:
. y '1 ,
ti _ _ . - _ _ - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - =
- my;g . ; ,;.. .; ,g.gl ::sg 7 g
, , , x. ,
,,;;;g; 3%;;;l;7a;;a32 y~jgE:XMG,,;pW
- o! Q3;i}l a
sici4ustPea
' ~ '
py,14 ', 2 0 --
' HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY '
SE CTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT . , ESASCO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 d QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C -
. INCORPoMATs0 ' QA-I-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM q i
d Procedure-No. 'Titie
, AININISTRATIVE SITE PROCEDURES (ASP). .
ASP-1 Preparation of Site Procedures' ASP-2 Organization and Responsibility [! ASP-4 Heavy Handling and. Rigging-ASP-6 Document Control > i ASP-7 Field Change Notice Procedure da ASP-8 . Preparation and Transmittalof Quality Assurance and Non-Safety Related Records. 1 1 ASP-10 Field Drawing Review for. Configuration Control i ASP-12 Development of Construction Field Sketches' I ASP-22 lR20 l Field Fabrication Modifications ) ASP-23 Measuring and Test Equipment. Control ASP-32 Maintenance of Construction Equipment ! CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCEDURES (CSP) CSP-1 Excavation and Backfill' CSP-3 . Control of Lifting Apparatus ! CSP-4 Concrete Placement l t e l . . l
- l. 1075d
~"
-_:____-- ___ __?_ : -
g- r 2 -- .7 mr , s; em r ;-, gc w ,_
.<. .p.ay y. o a; y ,, -
y y,gy;,, a,,,, G 4-.. > ),_ u..: x . : *
~.,,y n y.p
> c'y ,*ss
- :3.. , ...s, x?.p i+.L +,. , L., :;) . :* ',a ' s . 4 r.s s w .". . .!J, w d' hav% :- a 6109 21(STD14.4$
PAGE oF HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY
$ECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EB ASCO SERVICES L GN A N A ON UNm 1 & 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C mcomponAveo QA-I-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Procedure No. Title CONSTRUCTION SITE PROCEDURES (CSP)
CSP-11 Storing, Installation, Cadwelding, Fabrication and l Modification of Rebar CSP-12 General Instructions for Housekeeping During Construction CSP-18 Soil Test Fill Procedure l CSP-20 Construction Survey Activities CSP-21 Field Preparation and Coating of Surfaces outside i the Reactor Containment Building CSP-29 Reactor Vessel Internals Handling and Assembly CSP-30 Field Preparation and Coating of Surfaces Inside the Reactor Containment Building CSP-32 Insulation Resistance Testing CSP-33 High-Potential Testing CSP-34 Control and Verification of Survey Equipment CSP-35 Installation of Post-Tensioning Trumplate Assemblies and Sheathing CSP-36 Data Collection to Support Geotechnical Monitoring Program CSP-3 7 Crane and Hoist Load Testing CSP-40 EE-580 Electrical Installations CSP-44 Installation of Electrical Penetration Assemblies CSP-55 Field Fabrication of Reinforcing Steel i 1 1075d
W.65lG!&:A: N SEN,C5U N 5ih!..HE.E N D,# alS A;~' AN $ Wb
.p 7 ' ' G S , S;Ahi!E ,&, ,S, ,h,$(5 5.DAil S N55' & Ak5$s
" = - -
- f. '
+ '
b
^~ '
. s .
1
-x .
if' i stos 21(s7pmes -
.c .paog N . or[N I ,
VHOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY ; <a SE CTION I " h SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ' . , E8ASCO SERVICES .. ELECTRIC GENERATING STAT 10N UNIT 51 & 2 .
.INCoMPoRATs0 -' QUAUTY A33URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .- PART C . griz_1c" .
.J QUALITY' ASSURANCE PROGRAM ~.
U
- 1. t - , ,l
~ Procedure f: ' '
R No. - LTitlec .. , , CONSTRUCTION SITE ~ PROCEDURES (Cont'd) . , . . . , , N CSP-56 ApplicationandRepairofWaterproofingofht . < s F Buildings
. . n '3
-CSP-65 Reactor Coolant, Pumps Rigging and Installation.
.m e 3
CSP-87 '1
; Welding} Procedure. Specification!. Qualification .
CSP-93 Control of Weld Filler Material For.Non-Permanent Plant Maintenance
~~
i j! CSP-94 Maintenance Calibration' and Repair,. Program fory Dimetrics Automatic Welding' Equipment
'.lR2 0 .
QUALITY P'ROGRAM PROCEDURES (QPP) QPP-4 , Quality Program Coordinator - Description of.- ~ ( Position, Duties, Responsibilities. ' _ iI
.j J
QPP-3 Deviating.from the Corporate.Ebasco Nuclear. ; Quality Assurance Program Manual 1; l QPP-6 Assignment, Distribution' and' Control of the"Ebasco ! Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual - 1
-)
QPP-7 Revisions to the Eba'sco Nuclear: Quality.' Assurance. Program Manual d STANDARD SITE PROCEDURES (SSP) ' , o l SSP-1 Preparation, ' Issue, and Contro1~.of Standard 1 Site: 'I Procedures , .
~
SSP-2. Project Generic Pressure Test Procedure. '
. l I
j i 1075d 1 e .. .
"'? t_--_
- . - - := - - - - - - = -- --
EZGIME:11 12,ZUT.110,"IUQ J ...,QS. 2!i'.}ilE'?GTEL1.17 HEE.1..T y2N~ aa J.Il d.h.il.ua
+
sios.zitsress ' har II' or 20'
-HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY '
$E CTION '
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
' E B ASCO' SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 :
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C inconeonAtto QA-I QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM Procedure N No. Title STANDARD SITE PROCEDURES (Cont'dI -
. SSP-3 . System Completion and Release' for' Test' 1 i
l \. SSP-4 Jurisdictional' Release l l . . l SSP-5 Coring, Cutting or Drilling Concrete ; SSP Nonconformance Reporting SSP-9 Pipe Support Installation i SSP-10 - Installation and Field -Fabrication of Piping. .
)
SSP-11 Fabrication, Erection and Bolt-up of Structural and Miscellaneous Steel SSP-12 On-Site Shop Fabrication-SSP-13 Material Control .
.1 1
SSP-14 Stud Anchor Installation and Inspection ' i SSP-15 . Nonshrink Grout and Mortars SSP-16 General Structural Welding Requirements' j SSP-17 General ANSI B31.1 Welding Requirements l S SP-18 General ASME-III Welding Requirements-SSP-19 STP QA/QC Responsibilities for System and Area. 1 Turnovers SSP-20 Control of Vendor ASME Code Nameplates and -! Permanent Plant Tags SSP-21 Preparation and Certification of ASME Code N-5 Data Reports : I i i
-i 1075d '
'c W- ')
w__ _____- _.--- --
' m ' 3:'i y r 3 ;Jj;c W ._.,;..:: J 2 C. u?);. L i;i:%
- w.: L L . T C p c:;D c;; .n , * =; ~, ;;h:2L;.
- j. , , .... - .
sios at<ste>4.as . ' Pact _18__ or.20-HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBASCO SERWCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT $ 1 & 2 , mcomponATso QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C A QA-I-1. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM , t Procedure-No. Title STANDMtD SITE PROCEDURES (Cont'd)
- i 1
SSP-22 Piping System Cleanliness - 4 SSP-23 Release for Insulation'or Fireproofing SSP-24 Disassembly / Reassembly of Safety and Non-Safety-- Related Valves ,d 1 S SP-25 ASME Section XI Work- - SSP-26 Termination of Eiectrical Cable ! SSP-27 Installation of Electrical Cable I 1 SSP-28 Installation and Inspection of' Electrical Raceway and Support.s SSP-29 Post-Weld Heat Treatment SSP-30 Weld Filler Material Control ! l SSP-31 Welder Qualifications * ' SSP-32 Impact Review of Bechtel Documents ' SSP-33 Construction Safety Tagging SSP-34 Technical Requirements and Walkdown Procedure for As-Building of Piping Systems SSP-35 Procurement of Minor Repairs and Replacement Parts Under the NSSS Contract - SSP-36 Construction Work Package - Work Package Control SSP-37 Configuration Control Package
)
SSP-38 Installation and Inspection of'HVAC Duct / Supports. and Accessories i 1075d L_- - - _ , _ - -
T ' ".2 2:.a. X Z. S T,_ K 7 ? D T M G M X a a ' '523:L 2TIEV D"~ Idle " "flX iiN h- e:1 iX. j a sios 21(sTPi445 1191 '20 - PAog 4 or - -1
- HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWEP COMPANY
$ECTION SOUTH TEXA5 PROJECT EBAsCo $ERWCES ELECTRIC GENERATING $TATION UNITS 1 & 2 (
INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C qA.I_1-i QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM j U 4 Procedure No. ' Title
. STANDARD SITE PROCEDURES (Cont'd)-
SSP-40 ' Maxi-Bolt stallation'and. Inspection-
\
. SSP-41 Rock Bolt ' Installation and' Inspection SSP-43 Release for Installation of Penetration Seals SSP-44 Storage and Maintenance of. Permanent Plant Equipment-1 SSP-45 Electrical Separation- '
SSP-46 Field Material Requisition Preparation and Approval ! SSP-47 Inspection and R,ework of Class 1E M.O.V.'s SSP-48 Equipment er Component Interchange J SSP-49 Field Change Request SSP-50 Start-up Work Request SSP-51 Microbiological 1y Influenced Corrosion Monitoring- ' Program i SSP-52 Installation, Assembly and Disassembly of Permanent - l Mechanical Plant Equipment 'l SSP-53 Instrumentation Installation L ! SSP-54 Contractor Work Request SSP-55 Indoctrination and Training of Site Personnel-SSP-56 Project Record Review Program SSP-57 Installation and Inspection of-Electrical Equipment I i 1 1075d- ' _.______i - -
Ek?.f?%QLi%+2t([2, ISGS%&IUM %dW dit5!YI5: Ek~'A'? ?QLlSl - -*W W+~ c ; ,
=
f'NA~A ld ,,
' 3' 9 ,
H gif e.ggtsypugg, ptoc'20 L " or 20 )
- HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND power COMPANY '
S E CTION '3 SOUTH TEXA5 PROJECT ' . ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 ' ( EsAsco SERMES QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C mcommonavao QA-I-1
' QUALITY ASSURANCE ' PROGRAM.
I y Procedure ;1
~ No. Title-STANIARD SITE PROCEDURES - (Cont'd) -
, SSP-58 Area Turnover. ,
't i
SSP-59 Control of Vendors on' Site ' H 9 SSP-60 e.
- l Stop Work Procedure j
=i
'i SSP-61 Engineering Review.Walkdowns j
.1 SSP-62 Release for Installation of Appendir'R-Fire-Barriers .
.)
SSP-63 STP Document Type List SSP-64 Detailing,[ Fabrication andjInspection of HVAC, Duct, ') Duct Supports, Plenums and Duct Accessories J a SSP-65 Reporting o,f Significant Situations, Problems or ' ' l
. Concerns to Management . SSP-67 , Project Corrective Action . lR20 l
l l f
.j 1075d. 1 um_2._-._...___ . _ . . . . _ _ . -
.- 2.~a
. .LL.2 -.LJGMsLiuJ5.6..id usiD l 0 ; ,, l
- ifl :,t .
' l T. T '7 ' ~ T ,a.;.u.
a 1 sios 2HsT PM.88 pAgg 1 op N HOUSTON UGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT l EBASCO 5EmCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 31 & 2 QA-I-2 QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C INCoR PoM A TED j ORGANIZATION AND R. RESPONSIBILITIES i i
- 1. 0 SCOPE i This Section describes the organizational structure, functional I responsibilities, levels of authority, and lines of internal and' external communication for management, direction, and execution of the Ebasco Quality Program. It is recognized that quality assurance is an interdisciplinary function and not the sole domain of ~ a single quality aosurance group; for that reason, this Section of the Manual includes organizational end functional descriptions of several departments in addition to that organization whose sole function is quality assurance. 3
']<
2.0 CENERAL I i 2.1 The Ebasco operations organization consists of various applicable i operational divisions within Ebasco Services Inc, each headed by an j officer of the company. The South Texas Project is an independently run { operation with support by other Ebasco organizational units as described ( herein. I 2.2 Representatives from the various operational divisions including the Vice President Corporate Quality Programs comprise the Quality Program ! Committee which is responsible for Ebasco Quality Assurance policy, i This Committee is shown diagrammatically in Figure I-2.1 at the end of this Section. ; 2.3 The Ebasco organizational units on the South Texas Project most j directly involved in the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program ' for fabrication and installation are Corporate Quality Programs, and Ebasco Constructors Inc. The organizational structures of these are shown in Figures I-2.2 and I-2.4 at the end of this Section. 2.4 The responsibilities of the individual Ebasco organizational units for quality assurance requirements applied to nuclear power stations are described herein. 3.0 CORPORATE QUALITY PROGRAMS Primary responsibility for quality assurance rests with the Vice President Corporate Quality Programs who reports directly to the Chairman of Ebasco Services Inc. Qualification requirements for the position of Vice President Corporate Quality Programs are: Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering; minimum of 10 years of experience in quality-related work or equivalent experience in the engineering or construction of a nuclear power plant, including at least 10 years experience in responsible managerial project 1075d
' " (d [ , . .[I., ;I b b s.k b f,Eh' b D b [d b b3.3 b[b[h , h[b5 .(([ Y'h $
b 2' , 4, 't - n ,
; f i- '
fi , ,
+ 4.,
410 (STPub . ' 1 'p M .'2 (op 13 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY.': $E CTION -
- SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBA5CO SERYtCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2
; QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C -
~ INCORPORATE 0 QA-I~2'-
-ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES Positions; sud a chorough knowledge of the Ebasco Quality Assurance ~Prostam.
The; Corporate Quality Programs unit. is comprised of the following.
', organizations,i each of .which contributes directly to,the implementation' of .the
.Qualitys Program-(see. Figure I-2.2):
~
a) Quality Assurance , t b)' Materials Applications land Welding. c)' Vendor S'urve111ance* ' d). Quality' Assurance Consulting Engineer e) Materials Testing and Examination Se Nices;
'3.1 Quality Assurance is administered' by the Director Quality Assurance:
who reports to the Vice President' Corporate Quality Programs. Qualification requirements. for the position of Director. Quality Assurance are: Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineering;. minimuin of '10 years..of experience' in quality-related work or ' equivalent. experience in the -
~
engineering or construction of a nuclear; power plant, including at'least . 5 years experience in responsible managerial project positions;: and=.a'- - thorough knowledge of the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program. . Quality . . Assurance is responsible to ' plan implementation,' o f, evaluate,- nonitor, and enforce the Ebasco- Quality' Program.'. . This responsibility is carried out by live functional subdivisions:. a) Quality Assurance Projects *
~
b) Quality Assurance Site Services-c) Quality Assurance Engineering d) Quality Assurance Consulting e) Quality Assurance Regional Managers *
,
- NOTE: Not applicable to the STP Quality' Programs- Organization. <
S 1075d 4
. y
- .. v N+ <
MT M M" ' b NS Eb' by(;*' '
" hfM
W
'i-y 31 ',. , \. 0 ' ,
4{'f * ,f,,,, 4 2 ' '
, a i F
5 e *
'" ]
- j. ; ,
~f; .l . ' y .
_9;; '- oa*..,.a .: "
. 4119-2HSTPSSS . r
, .- p A g g
[3[ , ogr
..:13; ,~ O
. HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANYl '5E CTION -
., SOUTH TEXA5 PROJECT ~
ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2- l 6 EBA5CO $ERVICES INCORPORATED - QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION _-l PART C -QA ' L I-2!' 4
. ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES - ,
j l Managers ~ in charge of the subdivisionsTreportidirectly; toithe. Direct'or '.
. Quality. Assurance.L-Engineers andiSpecialists'are,thenLassigned to j specific projects.from these subdivisions._ The Quality-Assurancei 'l Organization ~ is shown 'in Figures;I-2.6 - and:I-2.7' at' the" and. ofi this :
L Section.': The- organization. and responsibilities"of; thef four;Qualityl
; Assurance' subdivisions associated with the South Texas:: Project are; '
' describedLin the following paragraphs.s 3.1;l ' Quality As'surance Site: Services :- The Quality? Assurance Sitel 7 1
. Services subdivision:isLheaded(byf the Manager Quality) Assurance Site' H Services who is responsible::foria111 site-related; Quality [ Assurance / ^
-Quality Control activities,Tincluding implementation:of the site' phase for all Ebasco project: quality: programs.: [A Manager,Siter
' Quality Assurancef whoireports: to the. Manager Quality Assurance Site ; ;
Services, and;ai Quality; Program Site , Manager, . who reports to the j Director Quality Assuranc'e,f are responsible ~ for. Quality Programi - i implementation for the South Texa's: Project in accordance with the - following:. z j 3.1.1.1 Site QualNy As'urance- s .The Manager [ Site Quality :1
- Assurance,_who reports'to the Manager' Quality Assurance. Site Services-in New York, is responsible:for-providing"technicaF 1
, r.ssistance and guidance to' subordinate Quality' Assurance! Site l Supervisors and staff, and for distribution fand contro1L of: _l quality assurance annuals,.as well as' changes thereto, for '
.I the South Texas Project.!.(See Figures I-2.2 and-I-2.6.')i:The l
Manager Site- Quality Assurance has' delegated authority;to . j the Quality Program , Site Managerion: the' preparation,' review, 'f _l approval, Land distribution control of: Site'. Quality Control " Procedures and Site Quality Assurance -Instructions;; and to approve the Standard Quality Assurance Procedures, and the' Standard Site Procedures when ' applicable, developed by, q the Client or his: designee. ' ' '
~!
3.1.1.2 Site Quality Prog' ram. - 'A. Quality Programi Site Manager'is assigned to; the, construction sitel on' a resident basis ~ for the purpose of overall. planning, direction, and laplementation of the Ebasco' Nuclear Quality. Assurance. j Program Manual. ' The Quality' Program Site' Manager, who' reports to the Director Quality Assurance,'isl subordinate to. :l no'. individual on. site and has the independent authority to ' l identify site quality-related problems, to initiate or ! 4 I me w-m,
. f:.
1075d i;
.i 'T ,, n 3 ,..
i ,,,
') "r ' ' ,~. . . . >- b a tos-21(sTClo-as '
- doog 5
'o, .1' 3 ;
HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY ;
$ECTION 'l SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT - '
EBASCO SENE5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2
- mcompon Atro QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-I-2 ORGANIZATION AND' RESPONSIBILITIES d
o d) Generate ' records of all . reviews, . :lR20; surveillance, and audits' performed. . il
~
e) ~ Review all radio 6raphic film for -
. -site-related nondestructive '
examination. ^j
~
f) Audit Code. records and ' documentation -lR20 prior to turnover to the' Client. .
.g) . Develop and implement Quality {
Assurance Instructions and review the ] Standard Quality' Assurance; Procedures f prior to the Quality. Program Site 1 Manager's approval and their - implementation. ~When applicable', 4 review the Standard Site Procedures { prior to the Quality Program Site', -: Manager's approval and their ' implementation. 4 h) Perform on-site distribution of those' , Quality Assurance procedures'which '{ are issued and controlled by the - { Manager Site Quality Assurance or his < desigoce, and distribute the Standard Quality Assurance Procedures. J
- 1) The' Quality Assurance Site Supervisor ]
has 'stop work authority. 3.1.1.2.2 Site Quality Control - A Quality Control l ' Site Supervisor and staff of engineers and. inspectors are assigned the following functions consistent with the scope'of work assigned to Ebasco:- , a) Planning and performance of . { inspection activities during the; construction phase.- '!
'I b) Identifying and initiating correction .
of nonconforming conditions to' requirements. indicated by drawings, - specifications, codes, or procedures,- ' and performance of reinspection to verify corrective action;taken. - " 1075d - s
? \*D?212.V 'ZXW :2 L 3W'%
- 3Gl2 i"X:.T:5~1.id??H M K W 51N..M lDL L ,.,}
3, > ;; sit s.at(snus P Act -' or ~} HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER f:0MPANY-SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT . EBA$CO SERVICE 5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 14 2 - QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAls DESCRIPTION - PART C INCoR POR A TED 'QA-I-2 1 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES - ' W c) Establishing and enforcing quality coutrol docume.ntation' and inspection - i requirements based upon; specifications,. '! todes, standards, and drawings as . O
, ' established by the Client or his .
designee. ' n
.d)L Performance or. monitoring of.' site NDE, '
soils, and concrete testing activities.
)
e)' Assisting in organizing and administering training seminars as
. required to assure proper level of training, and engaging in the ' 'I certification of Quality Control.
oersonnel to the< required level of -1 qualification.
]
f) Identification and control of the f quality status of items.
]
g) Development and implementation of- . I applicable Quality Control Procedures,; implementation of applicable Standard L ! Site Procedures,' and generation of 1 inspection reports covering mandatory J inspection activities.at the j construction site.- .j i h) Peview Standard Site Procedures, l 1 Construction Procedures, anc'. Quality l . Control Procedures prior to the lR20D
- Quality Program Site Manager's l' approval and their implementation (as I ;
applicable).' l; l
- 1) - The . Quality Control' Site Supervisor has stop work' authority.
The Site Quality Control Group will only be responsible for first-level Quality Control activities for safety-related items and services being perfomed by Ebasco's forces. 3.1.1.2.3 At the site level, inter:ediate positions for all of the above categories may be required but- .. functional ~ reporting will remain as depicted in 1 Figure I-2.6. (
.1075d
' ~
_ : T_ _ . ' '
3 G SL:~. D,.. DT ~ J.2 . .L ' R n %, N K : D .l" 1 3 M '_.. % G "ll T T L t 3 j. _
\
- a. l u ' '
s10N t($WW85 ,, g g / 'op 1 HOUSTON UGHTING AND POWER COMPANY fpEtTloH
$0UTH TEXAS PROJECT N ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 4 EBASCo SERVICES 1 QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C mconPonateo QA-I-2 '
ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES >, h' 3.1.2 Quality Assurance Engineering - The Quality Assurance > / , Engineering subdivision is headed by. the Manager Quality Assurance - 4 I Engineering. He is responsible for the.following activities which
- y-{
are under the direction of supervisors reporting to him and are ' performed in accordance with, Quality Assurance procedures: , cf(;' a) Administration of training and qualification progt's.ms for Quality Assurance audit and inspection personnel. 6 b) Conducting Quality Assurance education, both internal and j external to Quality Assurance. Quality Assurance ! Education Specialists.from Quality Assurance Engineering i are assigned to the construction site. These specialists report administrative 1y and functionally to the Quality Program Site Manager, but receive technical direction from Quality Assurance Engineering *at the Ebasco homa ; office. -
}4 c) Auditing of Site Quality Assurance activities covered by j the Quality Program.
3.1.3 Quality Assurance Consulting - The Quality Assurance Consulting subdivision is headed by the Senior Consulting Quality Assurance Engineer, who is responsible for the following activities: 1 a) Development of Quality Assurance standards and procedures. b) Interpretation of quality assurance requirements as i specified in national codes, standards, and regulatory }l l documents, and incorporating these requirements in ; company documents.
/ N 3.2 Materials Applications and Welding, under the supervision of the Chief Materials Applications and Welding Engineer, includes four subdivisions: Materials Applications, Materials Science, Welding Development, and Site Services. A Project Materials Engineer and Project Welding Engineer are assigned to the South Texas Project from the Materials Applications subdivision. These positions may be assigned to the same individual if properly qualified. A Site Welding Superintendent from the Site Services subdivision, who reports to the Chief Materials
- Applications and Welding Engineer in the Corporate Office, is assigne'd to the construction site and is responsible for the direction, supervision, ;
and administration of the site welding operations staff. Quality-related l l 1075d _~~__m__h
1:
- ; 3 7 v .w g g y g g 3 2_j G .2~; % {,, y ,d G ;z [ 'L'{> 2 ', 'l Q J J t i
- 1Q(JELLGS
(; ll%. j- f ( ~ f l,\ ::] O ' !U
)
,Tt, (q; ,p A q .g .g i
~ siosdisT&s
) ,, y ,, . 13 1 rA y .> -J.'iO 1 . , , I3 6
HOUSTON UCb TING AND POWER COMPkNY
> & R- 3 " C " 0" -
Netscop*JRVICE5'
. ECTRp I' s SOUTH (dXA5 STATPROJECT ON 4Nid! & 2/ .
M}' N F
$(.ENERATING n' .o my, w reo QUAUTY E'JRANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C .
y y8 g.74
~ . ..p \ . .
e ,1 8 rq
. \y/ ORGANIZATION D RESPONIHB11fTDtS M f cihi '
m 3 ,' g :
<N #
1 ,\) z
./
< +
u j
. b.
) i Abeivities ok M:,terials Applications /f'.; We1Jind peEhonne; isclude the
% )" b fo11cving:'( 'l i Q' i -( 4y 4 Iy a) Dev orf heerici and welding specifications.- l f4j;
.j
'6 h -
j + f b) Devr2h an( qualify .welddg procedurer,jind'fabricatyen technique pr use by F co site co2[struction forcea.. g c) Prepare 'sity welding operations implementation procedures fri-- .
- Ebasco site construction forces.' / -
al b g d) Advise Ebasco Construct & meinagement as to the'. develorpent and appiteation of advanced welding techniques which would \nhance'- 4
-quality.' q
/ .. e) Prepare Pr cus Data Checklists.yhich provide comprehenN -
# *f
; , requirements or welding) pro,:ess'.4cd procedure selection,
)> postw' eld teet al 1:reatadut, and inspection at the const1uct g
1
\, site.
l' i f l -
,A , , - 1 l
'O Review specifications and drawingr pr5vided by tbb Cient or his y designeedofcompliancewithapplicablecodesandregulatory..
]
%;\ [juiEc * \eg;ti}c#ad ot3 for proper selection
'e taile, and testing and, ewsiT/.nion requirements.
% welf procedures, of.ma.tertAl t
- )
j % ., y, p't , ' , - )
,, '{ 3 'I 4 >?s g) (upe/ vise.the'se.!derperformandetestingprogram'atthe ,
't p.
d' 3 , eta.v.ructiof site to assure that all code and regulatot? \< <
, j a{ to[(solve problems
/ o '!
,\
ky j x "+ yreqly y remen[*
- t. pys been met; y ~,
3 ; h) P M/e tec teal' assistance ad equired y at, .l ./ p 4 the chast2;ue '.on alte in the areas of weldit.g; sqterials, heat !. i Lh ,f treatment, y other related areas. i e ,
- 1) Provide techLiceJ assistance covbrdughatorial properties )
i g urcder service coul.'tions involving stress, radiatie p temperature, cot rosivr riaia, etc, to determine capabit.ty of - specific materials to pe;tform in such environments. - ' ' ?/ h y j)j gtyje, monitor, and provide Commendations for upgrading of " ~j
* [(,~1 >
eo7,welder training program andwel'aerassignmentgracticeq. i
)4 sp% y ty 4 -
E3 Prdp re and monitor site filler sp*eria13:ontrol procedures.q' t s )- \ 3 3 ,
-s 8 ,
6 P (' f s;, 9
,L . -
f Y J 1 2 , y k ,1075d \ 4 ' )1 e '
.A.
,7t s"
.;r c
"~+[ _ _
~ "~
E7hi11 l, M Afi],C" [K.y,?,'li,s -
'p ", ~,- ;.T ~ ~ . [d., " m S" - Q; v . ,,T,"G. ,< , ,;~ ,, ' ' '
I
'~
1 w,e e, 13
,,, 9 3
HCOSTON LIGNTING AND' POWER COMPANY
$ECTlON s SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STAT!ON UNITS 1 & 2 a EbASc0 SERyE5 J hPTiON - PART C QUAUTY AUURANCE PROGRAM DES' mconeonawo QA-I-2 URGANI2ATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES .'
Nvieps i ( 3' 1) Supelvise and direct teating and applied research programs reeqs.* red ' to resolve sige et,,nstruction materials and welding ) problev.h } l I 3.3 The Opality Assurance Ccensuin5g Engineer reports to the Vice President Corpci:ste' Quality Progrw. He is responsible for conducting-audits of the Ibacco Quality Assurana functic6to determine and report its compliance with the Ehasco Quality Progrcr. requirements. a f 3.4 Matarials" Testing and Examination Services, under the supervision of ?>- . the DJ. rector Mterials Testing and Faamination Services . includes two e
'. subdivisions: Materials Enginte ig labrutory and Inservice Inspection Services. '
l 3.4.1 The Materials Engineering liboratory perforss field ' nondestructive examination services. The Materials Engineering. i i Laboratory is admin.tstered by a Manager who reports to the Director Materl41s Testing and Examination Servf.cos. The FDE Iaboratory l superv1,sor 're ports adminis't.ratively tothe Materials Engineering laberprory Manager or hivc designee end 'Is responsible for the 1 technJ. cal 'irection of norAestructive examination activities peric.nvid b{y the Site. NIE Laboratory at the construction site. The FM Lakeatory Supervisor reports fcnetionally to the-Quality {
< Cadr">1 Site Supervisor t?r his designee. <
3,4,4 Itstrvice Inspectid Services is headed by the Manager of .! Inse vice ,tuspection Servqes, who reports to the Director Materials Testing and Examination Servf.cag. : He is responsibib for the i followig activl. ties which are under the direction of supervisors i reporting tc ~. tim: a) Est.t.blishment an1hr interpretation ' f oNDE requirements , { and acceptance cr'teria for fabricated and erected ' ac,uhment as rr>cf reed. l b) Reviewing and commenting on NDE procedures and radiogr7phic films submitted by site construction forces and/or clients.
' c) Advisf ug site construction forces as to proper NDE procedures, applications, techniques, equipment, and qual!fications.
l N75d , I s 3 f,r * '
$* f u_________ _ .-
'.1;/h ShEMb. ;hhh b * * * '
[ "Ns ' p ' '] y;r >
- y. ' '
'4[ ' iC
+ 4 ,
imi i
, i 3.
i m , A i p C iC 4 4 , s j, . . , 4 SC. - c & Y'
, ~ 81094ttST7NS ,
- . > m , . . "lQ
- PA3E : cF - Q' 3 "
iL' - HOUSTON OGMTING AND power COMPANYr SECTION : 'd
$0UTH TEXAS PROJECT 5 g , EsASCO 52RYlCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 ~
.. M MME PROM ERIPTM y PART C : !p INCoRPonATsD' -' ' @Q -
. ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBLE.ITIES i ,
.s 7
d), Qualification and certification of Ebasco NDE personnel. J
' 3.4.2.11 Radiation Safety - Ebasco's Corporate Radiation'4 '
o
- Safety Officerireports:to:the Manager ISI Services.f He is'-
> o responsible for the compilation of occupational; radiation ,n exposure records' received from. Ebasco employees and Licensees.:
g a > l 4.0 EBASCO CONSTRUCTORS'INC Primary responsibility. for construNion rests with the-President Ebascoi t Constructors Inc. < The Construction organization has the prime' responsibility 4 ' for the performance'of-quality construction ~onlthe South Texas' Project:andris-described in the following paragraphs.' .
]
4.1 The President Ebasco Constructors Inc_ reports [to: the Presidenti ,. , Ebasco Services Inc and is responsible..for executive' managements oflallt construction activities and' services. (Sse Figure I-2.4.'):. , [j
> ~
4.1.1 The' Ebasco Construction Manager reportsito the' President j Ebasco Construct' ors Incfand is responsible for'overallLsupervisioni g. ><; and coordination' of all" construction activities" and ' services;' and" ' providing ' the training and . development programs for- construction. 4'1- ', Additionally,'the Ibasco Construction' Manager shall approve ^ thel 1 Standard Site. Procedures.. The Ebasco Construction Manager lhasLatop 'f j work authority. 9
,y .,
4.1.2- The Manager of Construction Quality ireports to' the President . ,
-i Ebasco Construct ors ' Ine ; and : is responsible l for L development J of.
l Construction procedures,7 keeping abreast of NRC 'and. code u[
~
e requirements, and reporting to: Construction management of current ! Quality Program status. J il 4.1.3 The Site Manager reports to the Ebasco. Construction' Manager. . / The Site Manager has. the responsibility for the direction and ' 4 coordination of all' on-site activities related to constructiori. , , l i The Site Manager has'stop work authority.- ' Jy 4.1.' 4 The Discipline. Managers; report to the Site Manager. - ' Each Discipline Manager is: individually.' responsible for: the Ebasco ~ . fj construction operations and' activities within his assigned 1 ' _*T discipline. . He will manage. all: phases of r construction within j
, disciplines assigned, including field' engineering and cost? control):
j.
~
~
to assure that.the work accomplished is completed 'within. the ' budget c ' and in accordance' with the contract and. all applicable installation- ..] t-g ^ e $ , T , .'
.. js 'h!
1075d
- W ~4l:
, -( .
ay.7 gn , j , , 1 . m'k . I.y s
NIa fY$ b . I s. 'd 0 5 L. lA tk sh . (; 6 >s '
'-f ',, ,{[3' ;3s _.
u ? s.
.c. ,
. . . . ~ , .
m ,e2 4 -o v- , ..
" 6109 21f5TPMJS .pacy 113 ' 'or 13.
~
. " HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY j
$ECTION ; i
'i SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
'EBA$CO $ERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2f INCORPORATE 0 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C -
' QA- I- 2 f ORGANIZATION ; AND RESPONSIBII.ITIES ,
- 4 1 1 5 -. n,_,
m
,y plans, procedures, - specifications, drawings, 'and the -Quality . .
Assurance Program. . The Discipline Managers have stop work authority.; m 4.1. 5' Th$ Imbor Rilat' ions Representative reports to' the ~ Site . Manage r. . The Imbor. Relations Representative is conversant with the . .g general' provisions of the Project Stabilization Agreement.; . The: . . 'f> 14bor Relations Representative; participates,in settlement ~ of local labor disputes,. assists in preparation; for arbitration proceedings i 7 related to operations .at the site, and ' advises the Site Manager on-s local labor relation matters.' T 4.1.6 The Senior Resident, Engineer reports lto the Site. Manager and is responsible for administering,: coordinating,'and supervising;all 0- . Site Construction Engineering' and technical activities, for interpretation of. design aocuments and specifications,: and forj furnishing assistance to Ebasco site. personnel! as required.g ' The'- Senior . Reside'nt Engineer has stop work authority.; 4.1.7 The Construction Services. Superintendent reports to. the' Site Manager and will be' responsible for providing and establishing. . adequate and efficient accounting,' timekeeping, and computer support programs as required to support the construction effort.. . . 4.1.8 The Manager of Safety / Security reports' to the1SitelManager. The Manager of Safety / Security is responsible for establishing.and 1 enforcing the site security, safety,, and. industrial; bygiene' programs in accordance with established policy 'and all federal and state. regulations, as well as any other. criteria necessary 'to ensure 'the; safety of site personnel. 4.1.9 The Permanent Plant Maintenance (PPM) Superintendent reports to the Site Manager and is responsible for' administering the maintenance program for permanent plant equipment upon. receipt from - the warehouse until turnover to the Client. 4.1.10 The Start-up Support Superintendent interfaces: with the-Client's Start-up Manager and reports to the Site Manager for1 project coordination. He is responsible for systems testing, . including ensuring construction progress in' support of systems - testing,.and conducting construction test efforts.- L 9 1075d - o yy .. a
.- t . , < , p
.- < ,r- 1 .
+
- _ .______mi__ _ _ _ - - - - - - - -
R"T;L.wQj.=..'i.T.GT. G :G n.12CD M 5 % %.C22.25 312MB;%kK J J.G lit..Z.L.+:M 4,.72.L< d
. e sos mstr>44s ** '
- P . n,$12 y13 _
HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SE CTION - SOUTH TEXA5 PROJECT . EBA5CO SERVICES . ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 31 & 2 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C INCORPORATED -QA-I-2 ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES 4.1.11 The Site Fabrication Shop Coordinator reports directly .to the Mechanica1L Discipline Manager. and .is responsible for coordinating work to be performed in the. fabrication shop, ensuring housekeeping is. maintained in.the fabrication shop, and establishing laydown areas 'around the fabrication ' shop in support of the construction effort. 4.1.12 The Systems Completion Manager reports' to the Site Manager
. and is responsible for the coordi ation of ' systems turnover to the' Client.
4.1.13 The Shift Superintendents (2nd"or!3rdishift) report to the Site Manager and are responsible for directing, coordinating, and providing general supervision of all construction activities associcted with their shift. The Shift Superintendents have stop. work authority. 4 5.0 INTERFACE Interface, as applicable, is so illustrated by Figure I-2'.9 at. the end' of this Section and is explained by appropriate and applicable South Texas Project documents.
)
9 1075d
- .i . 1
,,m.,,.,.
+
a m e m oaawwww m... w.nze.=.wxM=*?LDLu t y; s
- 'p 3 W fQ W I,.nM T? & f 5} f- ?, N T ig siosaitsrev..as - x, v.' '
' W . . m~
- pasc'13 ? - or ' 13 -
' HOU5T,0N LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANI(
SECTION ' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT 1
' ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 , m EBA5CO SERVICES ' .>.
mconeonATso QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C;. QAi-l-R' ; ORGANIZATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES'
. ': c ,
i< 3 < 6.0 ' ORGANIZATION CHARTS ' ' l ll Thet following figurea apply to this Sections ; Piaure No. '
-Title
, Revision a. 1 I-2.1 ,0perations Organization Showing Quality Program Committee Representation? 7-STP- '?
'I-2.2- Corporate Quality Programs Organiz'ation 9-STP I-2.3- Deleted ~.
.I-2.4 Organization'for Construction' ' '
8-STPf I-2.5 Deleted ., I-2.6 Quality Assurance Organization .9-STP ,' ' I-2.7 Quality Assurance Engineering?' Quality Assurance Specialists 8-STP
.j I-2.,8 Deleted -
1 i' I-2.9 Interface Between. Houston Lighting' & - Power Company,' Bechtel Energy Corporation, . , and Ebasco Services Incorporated' ~
,5-STP0 e 1
4 i i l l 1 i o
)l q
1 i
;j l'
- 1075d
' l' t~ m. ;
<- i
' d 4 i
N N A T u A a e e t 'I m Pst P
# O Oe(
lA 5 fe "O "fP t OR C H G P C
=
= - 5
=
=
T & 1C Y N E ,pG
= M J ,
,aO .
O C L
= MU R NO P M-P P
VggvH aN O ME OM
= NW 1
L A OC C
= CC I
pAE - M = MTP EE T A = R
= (
G = O =
' T N s R E D
m P = e s P M P E i A O OR ME DYT
=
=
R P E R C EI iC M TLN AAO
= V
=
RUI T = OQ A = & R t ~ PGT = Tc WA T L RNN = t s ROAe t sM O: 3G M f DIMC C E S P er
't .
OI E Nt I OV t O OR Mt CWS NOE =
= t SP E
a CW t t aR n i t S#P E R P" I R E S C N I HR RA
= vt n
SSP OM NIR I
=
=
EN E E A SH CO R I C 5 I T m VT E N Y N 0T O RAE - E D 50C 0 5UC
. pep O ME s
EZT I S : 4aN 5 OR - t t E 9f I C R 15 SINI T 8 P P O N '- ' OAM C CGM SR O l AO C BS C N - EN " OT E N S E P aP t I O I'A I BPY E AC tt O OR ME C - T R f A S R E P G 1 O TN N E fM I R3 I - T Y ReDfA W " - OtMR 8 t oI p eP t MfGG R sU t O oR mI 1P 5 NE O R i C E P R' CP I R& P "# - V O I
' C G N
- ,f l N O - , t t AR A - f A Rf P MP Ot t C OM I - YgP Nt tR C N g
, 8O G I
U
, M CN ( M
- O C r l.
EG Y CNR TlANITLN EE lRUt A USG USNN OS
- A OE C
" y N ~
*Y Y O &
4 *R . T R G Nt 0
.gGY OR. y S S SE T
I g RLNR toy aE R F T T OIT T Ac g . E A I O GI RT AS RIVTA g IC OIS A SLS C ES Ng gV A l E T mg R t yI ARE E A NE A TN R 0 9 RS AEO A R N E S 1 AN SVI I RC IO Z I 1 D 1Ag lit g T M A GB MNA IO LUA ES PN AS MIS E ET PP U S A I E- I S&D N M EL O N" A I D A S E G TR * *
- S E
AO RE E E OC C S CtV R DN R A O NR R AA Nf OS P I NA t L VSt O LI S DtV O DtN
!I Nt RM f F i v
Nti R E V Vt P E E V E S E OA e S . Ht UR RU US R UP CR T M N E RA CS S SE R NG I N A E D T G SO M R I AO SRR f UP l ER I A RP P R TY - _ CP I H C fO4 CCL Y S eY V I V A V'S . C $ ' RY - O U FILENG .EUS PT Nt 9 A G - A. K ET Re E A C I vCS IL A UNR iNGA Ue UN R SI OAE t RI A NI SM T N V A O L RRt E UN t A C S L AA A E A Y U URE
. L T O
C A G SI A SG AN OSES SE P YN TO L L N W T A 59 A SN E S U N :AND I A E I N IL G ' . G A AE AQ B R vC OTN E M N E UR O T t A EE 1 Ct f A R I RU U T t OS O S
- Y
* ' E A A i t
v i . Sf S f Y T tt f f5 E CS NN R t AC S E isE nC RA A CC T I S AUS H t S UNT UN OT O OA C E OAgSSRy& UNI V OA R R UVF ES SRf P R RJ EUO T C Ug S RR E EUS GAPT A YUS f A GSR Sg R A N A-SP O E S p R' J AyG GSSE A AT NTS & AIE O N I t . gN S ML T A' f
- E A AI P
M US C M O
==
= -
& S -
.SS ' SN S LN AO G RLO EAI G" R L E R S I N GI T eNI EA GI C E E F
E I HEA IRT Di I L A RA C t t DN Ht IG I I ARN NET IE GEt ATI iV C TC Nf t N A f Ci A ASC A SR E A Ai Me ttW P wNI E P M MF MM M S A A '
tt e t*G n0 e e t t se s e e s
*.n .
- s. matO _ a <" .
aE L n e cT C - mP t t a iw P e e e e e
. m=". .
e A e s
- .o pnt o >.
~ gG y
nA . - c ,a4 N . #- > . 3h 6
=. .
u . n i= o v g 1, I n".e w g ia .
,cm c N g e ,
O I
,O
.o T, v 2
l T eU Ci i. hCaR U Y N A P 1 S cRntt a T U
.S aWs O mry 1
=o'u a
s. r 0 T C s' oT pS 0 0 I N U a CT r o N - M E C N _
,_e ..
cono f J O I $ nCr oRPwOAP TS . We 4 T f R. 4 )
$ ,att. n i 9 t I ,$
5 L . fN 1 E t. _ sR o&t 5 A G DS Hc. f
$ A W91 e eo. 4't s.Mm i
trG eA ft l ea s. eor Gre X e W f SF s mf ng 5 ta5A 8 a . i c F AoT W E T TA RI $ f e ft O 5 R se S m v P C O r NnH GHTU RN C SIeO U 0 E E n T N 5 G oA c O T S C , sZ I U O RI T l
.. n.
baN C H I L , E G A E
.o R -
O a n o v TE I w S e-e.
'mv a
a I aao
=- c
==n -
l c
.- o a f nyt sp f
e - e n,samet "
" . m, ,,
. s
.u5 . ". ,
ot 1A ~ e
~
~
- m. v..:
,, .:.a.
.m .m.,
.-w- ~w.La s + ~ a. mm.m,mv.ns
- n. . .. . w;;,w v.: .. ;
. .mn 'i :~ ~ n 1.w
. .x-
. xn;,
, .,.;as
. . a . . ...e = . a u .
w -
" y--e""q
' FIGURE'!-2 6 -
REV. 9-STP-.
'l
.,- 'i y
s : r ,- y: : 55
.a y:..
5: 'r=
}}[$r I d
33:5< sii!! - 5 512
- E;ii! i
*$88.5 l85..W s.$.. 85.F E -.g} g . '5 s:s!
i -l
>v; . >
,, e : .s - .
- 252 5: i j!!.
..! '8Bf E ..
9
] 3 Z
Oo w- ,.
. e.
y-
=. !ar o '
o e yv .y p< -
- 5.
o .. 1
. 85 5:=!
-. s.n=-
sg e . i, Ef!:<:s CCbl * .-* * [2- ga). 2 iK i Oz Q-8 1
-1 Cc g< .
-j O cc !
l CO 2 j l
-w . 3 i,
l I y) O WZ
~
" E_ !
e r s ,2 __ -- i 5E s-ugst E_!_!5
.gE c l
Q( 5 0@ s, 5w g . $ w { g -. tt .> s. a.
>D gg y)
, s, r se eg~.i .
1 g &) gy < a
>y 1 >ys l E.:!i E.:s j!js' Op j!*i -
c oy .. ... U) - 4'4 CD WD 0 4 i # Z I 9 r, s ; .
- n. . .r..
. .g .g.
. n i o : . 1: .a . 3 I
!- " y
- .! E ty:E -
o -.. I ss
- - i!i ei:r.gfr,ea<i :-..- as .5
- 3 't
;i 88.3 . ; ::: 5.:: ! 8.g" rt i
- -ag 8 a
..a --
W
.r . .a . <r .. '.
3 3. ~ . .E
.1 : = -
s$! E!s $
. EE -
1 e .e e 8 > E >$ -> 5 > $ 5 :.$v sy:k
- !v ":.:- :.:
E8 Ib h
~
Ebk ESh i 8."s$$ t ;,t.h
. S a. g g86 . s s. .a I
1 e- i
NVCO ARsi .v 0TNS f I AV I NUR A 0$t T l 1 fLRR A A UE f $ fAseN t RUSP A t EOSU R VeGs T P AS EI P NeR O ' OA LEr a U R . O - l
. t E R c
e C E
# N MD A T A T NAA R SWt R O RS ts NsT tRt U
SDu$ SR tVt S UDail SR t I 6P ct I i AOCR A Oc C oA ,R O U Yfcat Vf Nt AC R TR NA P IL U S TR t Ar s G M t
. A A M '
I - U U O O Ee G R VCt t 4 . - E T8 8 R o s G - G lAE i A vF TIN t N A RE I A U UN l - e rot D i 5 t M O5AN G e UA - t u s DGS E TI NT 5 0" - A RIS G " W" l - R EL I WA N" "C - O EA s R " L' P NIC i T . C - T I R . R t GMR R GE i f u wm - StNf O 9s O E t EuS t aA - ONP I R AGR V I l uc R t t CES V trat f
& AU Nr N
l0P a ,,J M NE E t $ v,Rt sm o - t M t A I U vt a n G CC O ti CRa - t R O VC TN RcR tU Oi S NN T C tt A R A l i A O s UsRe OtrW E AA t U R U S D -OSA I 1 Ram C RR - ~ A I V SS UU - R - E SS S AA . O YY l - CITT I SL L AAA - BUU EQO 1 G - m s i s t Y f -_ uYgR C R e S 1 N f Ot' I Nt Ot Ae t T = At - _ Rt f - CA U UG ta U ' ROS SN - O A I GU O - s E - N Rt E a S
) l I
C - N
* ,l 8
A fg uMt l UP A ,0 c t I, , v o, i I I ,E
,D i A
N ~ 4
' - t
P. .
. R.C O. OmN C .
. C.I R
YmS G.EC D WPO E O C R RmI EwV E P NuR T &.Y . ems E A GG N.E R leo E.C n N T. S R TI H. E G G HmA Y N O P G . L E T gR oE IN T C n e ft C.B Eu. B.E A R IL. N. H t E g N EE J E O N n P O O.C T.E oG I . Rt PG m N M C , S. U.B E le E
. l
_ O N Om Ho m C I
- m R S
_ w E E C _ C m _ W I m . N I O V _ m . T _ P R .
. n. NOO ECT R
_ E m. DS C
& S w S
E I aU eR m Rt f _ G O P $ N
.m N C .
O C I S *. T n H A . m - G I B E R N O tR u n w
- N O
I R R' E
, i T G
_ L " . OC U G E m Cu f A D t'. t A Ua N a _ N N .. En I F SA i N e HN 1S a M _ O A M NM O m NM O f i _ T , C m C l E _ S N l m U _ - m O O I -
. r
. u =
_ H T - m
=
N A -
. m
=
=
E R - f
=
E O . f A R Ovi N E C
=
_ P * - .
. R 4 . m T t A
=
=
_ W R - . O0 P R
. m u
C t R E AU =
=
_ T O - O . m R I U$ O$A = E D
- C C
_ = _ e B -
. n e
=
=
Y - _ m m - E C G
~ .m
. n n
R n A A m e R R F E T. m. A OR m G E O G R N ' T C G E a R NA E E T L 'a E J N O A RM A e n u P V A 1 4E tI M _ N E m. P A: U5 I T . m O H . C E g m. " _ B .. _. m o - f.
E.;$k$b-
$YY I
. ~
p1 js . wm,y,%
~r J '
,e '
,,,, if ;3,l31 , O HOU$ TON 1 fGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECT M 'i SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
~
EBAsco SENCEs ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 .. .
~
INCORPORATED QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C L 'QA-I-3 ;j PERSONNEL' INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING PROGRAM'IN QUALITY ASSURANCE I'. 0 SCOPE-J This' Section describes ;the program for indoctrination land training of' Ebasco -
~
l personne1 engaged.in activities'affecting quality.with respect to:the 4 requirements of this Manual and its' supporting: principal; implementing, R procedures. Ebasco personnel- shall.be' indoctrinated and trained, as-necessary, to assure that proficiency is achieved and asintained in; those parts of the Quality Assurance Program as.it applies to the individual's - responsibility. " 2.0 GENERAL j The Indoctrination and Training; Program is a. combined effort of the' Ebasco . organizations implementing any portion.of this Manual ~ and its principa1L . implementing procedures',' and the -Quality Assurance organization' .The . < Construction, Materials Applications and Welding, and- Quality ' Assurance: >
.I organizations are responsible to schedule, indoctrinate, L and train. theirL .j personnel, and to record this indoctrination and ~ training .'unless' otherwise . j denoted by project' commitments. - 1 3.0 PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS- ,
3.1 Preplanned written lessons shall contain the's botance' of the: indoctrination and training program. ' These lessons shall address one' or. more quality-related topics, to achieve one 'or more stated educational objectives. The training will be conducted.by trained supervisors' or their designees within the. Construction and' Materials. Applications and Welding organizations, and by a Quality Assurance-Education' Specialist or designee when the need c rises. A Quality Assurance. Education Specialists will be responsible for training the selected instructors within~ the; other Ebasco organizations in methods of conducting required quality.. assurance training. 3.2 For Construction, Quality Assurance, and Materials Applications and ' Welding, preplanned training lessons are maintained by- each organization - respectively. The preplanned training lessons relate to activities . the
~
personnel shall be performing..- For~ Construction and. Materials-Applications and' Welding, s' responsible person-'within the respective organization shall determine the training requirements for each . 1 individual based on that individual's. assigned responsibilities and past. i experience. ' Within the Quality- Assurance organization, a Quality R Assurance Education Specialist shall be' responsible for determination'of - 1 1075d , ;
._ _ . , -. - g-- n , y x.~ : w. w----
h*MMsbididb2NODMkhkb N'k 'N , mx p*Yp~ w::@ pm , ,
. v ,
y f k ( _,n.,( ,
+
& *m , \+ Y a +
'*W * "
'l' ia. s tos.sitstChas ' i ' , _ \
= pAci-gr- , zop '
HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPAN I SECTIONI
' ~ SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT a ;
d EBASCO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENLRATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 ? . lNCoRPORATaD QUAdTY A$$URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART i9 KIN! C. ' u' ! s, PERSONNEL' INDOCTRINATION AND TRAINING'.. PROGRAM IN QUALITY ASSURANCE' Y ' f1
- an individual's training; requirements basedtupon' thatiindividual's 9 !T-'
~ s assigned responsibilitiestand past experience,,as.' applicable... Preplanned : ,
f training lessons 'are updated, when required,iandfreflect any changes Lin' ' k the program. Copies of. these preplanneditraining-lessons .shalll.be liept V
, . on file byf the. respective : organization. ; Quality-affected : training ;will; ,
reflect project l requirements. !
~ ~
- i '
l' 4.0 RECORDS < 1 h- Individua1' training files for personnel in thel Construction,f Quality..
- h. . r a <
Assurance , tand= Materials , Applications, and. Weldingsorganizations receiving indoctrination and ~ training in accordance with this program's requirements ! ' shall be maintained by each affected organization.. .These' records will indicate, as applicable, the~" subject matter, the training received. . attendance date, time duration, instructor, and special' qualifications or restrictions,; if'any. . f 5.0 SCHEDULING Scheduling training of applicable . organization personnel l willi be coordinated' with a Quality Assurance Education Specialist where necessary. 'As ' new a personnel are added to the South Texas- Project 'within an: organization. . appropriate, indoctrination and training sessions will be scheduled based ont the requirements of this Manual. N ,
, 6.0 . PROGRAM UPDATING s
This indoctrination and training program is subject to continuous development? to broaden and improve its. effectiveness. . A. Quality Assurance Educations Specialist will hold periodic. discussions with those: groups involved with. the - training program to coordinate recommendations for updating. 'A Quality Assurance Education Specialist is responsible for' updating. the program' for. the ? Quality Assurance organization. ' 9
- 7. 0 ADi1NISTRATION 7.1 The , Quality Assurance Engineering Quality Resources and- Training ,
Management Group shall have overall responsibility for administrating the [ quality ' assurance training program. It . shall provide technical' expertisc - L for developing'necessary programs and r'eview existing programs for currency. 1.9
-i e
1075d' >
.g. , .
y y %
mn l$MayLSL:LiLZ5hlYb72"M WigyHXL70Z:K
, -n 4 W 2 3:55g.3;:..;';.N, a m K W ;;;;;
-g w n .2 i u. g jj j
yl 2, '1 ; shs 21t'sTP445 ' ' ' '
- 4 ^ * '
l~pAag 3 ,, ' 3 '
'{
HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY '
$NTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT.
EBA5CO $ERVICES - ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 31 & 2
.auconpoRATEo : QUAllTf ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C .
..QA-I-3 PERSONNEL INDOCTRINATION AND .1 RAINING ~
' PROGRAM IN' QUALITY ASSURANCE, 4
m W l 7.2' Management of each Ebasco organization is. responsible: to assure that. ~ the appropriate. personnel attend the training program (s) foriwhich they are scheduled.
.. 4 8.OJ TRAINING,! QUALIFICATION, AND CERTIFICATION OF QUALITY CONTROL PERSONNEL'- .
4 Training, qualification, and ' certification of Site' Quality'.Contro1' inspection: , j personnelt shall be in accordance.with. written procedures. i The. Quality. Control' 3 Site Supervisor or his desiignee shall coordinate.with a' QualityfAssurancen d Education Specialist regarding the' training, qualification',' and ' certification' , of Quality ' Control personnel.' 1 Qualification . records for all: Quality Control' 4 personnel assigned to the South Texas' Project. site 'shall be maintained byl a - Quality: Assurance. Education Specialist.at the. site. Theselinitial certification records willL be reviewed by 'the Manager. Quality; Assurance * ]l
]
Engineering, or his designee; for, compliance with the' qualification H requirements. Any deficiencies detected after initial certification.shall be:
!li reported-'in writing to the . Quality Control' Site (Supervisor for. resolution. . m. lR20-'j If necessary, pending resolution of the deficiency, the individual shall- be.
.l 'D restrained frost performing any Quality ' Control . activities. ' , '
' 9.0 AUDITS Audits shall be performed in accordance 'with Section' QA-III of this' Manual.
. lR20 H i
to assure conformance' to the requirements of this Section. l. i' ( i a i t 1 a 1 1 1 sq
,l f.F*"*
-1075d - ' '
, i 1
; , , v .
.; y;: ,
s k
4,NG8 '.5 i ...JT!5% L?ff32 "EVhhiZ ilyWL9.jyiC. CW . eI O.M c.3 2 E { y po . , =stos ustru.as; ,
,.>h ,. ,
-,,,,r , ,s r
,g 1 ,j-4-
HOUSTON UGHTING AND POWER COMPANY
'q '. S E CTION -
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT p -EsAsCO SERVICES . CM GEWAN $TAMN W31 & 2 INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C-
. QA-I-6 '-
QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORES a 1.0 SCOPE This Section covers the requirements and guidelines-forL the collection, filing, storage, disposition, and maintenance of lifetime and nonpermanent-quality assurance' records associated with the construction and maintenance.
~
activities.. Corporate records related to the South Texas Project,"such as
' audit reports, : shall be forwardsd to the ' Quality Program . Site. Manager or~'his -
designee for incorporation into the Client's Record Management System'.. 2.0 ' RESPONSIBILITY l 2.1 The responsibility - for receipt , . review, and . processing -'of quality ' assurance: records is jointly administered by the Client or his designee! I and Ebasco. 2.2 Ebasco is responsible for the adequacy and maintenance ofi quality assurance records generated by Ebasco untill completion of activities.. The HI4P STP - RMS Site Records Center is the principal and final records repository. All QA records shall be accessible to the. Client or his designee until such time as they are turned Jover. toi the Client or his-designee. 3.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS SYSTEM-Each organization within Ebasco (including but . not .11mited ' t'o, the' Construction' and Quality Assurance organizations) that participates in the generation,
~
collection, filing, storage, or disposition of quality assurance; records- shall establish a written quality assurance record system applic'able to the: function (s) performed by that organization.' These written procedures shall j provide that each completed quality assurance record shall be transmitted by: ; the organization generating the records to the Client or his designee. 'This system shall be implemented and enforced in accordance with the requirements l of the following paragraphs that apply to the function (s) 'of; that organization.. 4.0 GENERATION OF QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS ' i 4.1 The QA records to be generated 'shall'be as 'specf fled in the; 'lR20 applicable design specifications, construction, maintenance, ' test, or - 3 i' inspectiori procedures, and other documents as necessary. 1
- j
'd
.t 1075d
++ ' * *
{ I I O
7 7:if.1;.CiRZ1:.3,l!E?l[35531NZM hYJ2 E Q.5'.iO2,2 E M :,j f C ilZ N,M 1', W s tos rtistolo.as'. rang I =or 0
' HOUSTON 1.lGHTING AND power COMPANY '
S E CTION ' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT: E B ASCO SERVICE't ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 ' mconeonAvro QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C .
-QA-1 QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS 4.2 All- QA records shall be dated and ' igned s or otherwise ' authenticated.
4.3 -QA' records'shall be indexed. 'The indexing system'shall inc1Ude as a> minimum: *'
'4.3.1 QA records retention times (retention period begins ~ on date of satisfactory operation of items).
4.3.2 Location of-storage area.- 4.3.3 Location of QA records within storage area. 4.4 All QA records shall be distributed 'and handled in accordance with' written instructions. 4.5 There shall be sufficient infomation 'in the QA records to permit identification between the records and the item (s) or activity to which it applies. Identification of QA records may be by purchase order-number, system, or any means that permits' accurate traceability. q 4.6 All QA records shall be classified as '" lifetime" or " nonpermanent." 4.7 When QA records are corrected or supplemented,they shall be reviewed or approved by the organization that originated the~ records.- All corrections and supplements shall bear dates and ' authorized signatures i or initials traceable to the authorized individual.- 4.8 Inspection and test records shall contain the following, ;as applicable: , I a) The type of observation. b) Evidence of completing and verifying an inspection or test operation. c) The date and-results of the inspection or test. I d)' Information reisted to nonconformances. ' e) Inspector or data recorder identification. f) Evidence of the acceptability.of the results. e 9 1075d - 1'
mm.
. t x7 ..s
;g:3.9.:a v a> y. ua w w. u m:u..e =;mm,,
- a. c~
p a. ,.x..=.ym.smywa.a qwy: qggg.,p y.u m. 27.yum 4.w+ y* t a.a
.w.:e amA.-m wy; w s g 9~ '
1 a , , s . p r gr< < \
^
sios at sn a.es pig, 3 - - oj 4? HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION ' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2
.EB ASC'O SERYlCES INCoR POR ATEo QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION . PART C QA-I-6 '
QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS-5.0 RECEIPT OF QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS' 5.1 A system shall be established for receipt of QA records at the' Site which shall include:- 5.1.1 A checklist designating the' required QA records. ; i
.i 5.1.2 A record of QA records received.
5.1.3 Written procedures for receipt and:1nspection of incoming
~
l. p site QA records.
- lR20 ;
5.2 The system describ'ed in Paragraph 5.1 of this Section'shall permit ' an accurate assessment of the. status of- the QA' records during. the' I receiving process. 5.0 TEMPORARY STORAGE, PRESERVATION, AND SAFEKEEPING 6.1 QA records shall be stored in accordance with.a. written procedure which shall require or include the following:- I 6.1.1 Description of storage facility, if other.than a dual , facility. 6.1.2 Description of filing system to be used. l 6.1'. 3 Method for verifying that QA records received'are 'in' ! agreement with transmittal documents and pre-established records, ! checklist and that the QA records 'are legible. l 6.1.4 Rules governing access to files. ; 6.1.4.1 A list shall be generated designating those : i personne1'who shall have access to the-files. 1 6.1.5 Method for maintaining control of QA records removed from storage. Such method shall provide.for' signing out of QA records removed from storage or other appropriate'means of maintaining control of the records removed. - 6.1.6 Method of filing supplemental information and superseding obsolete QA records. Supplemental.information shall be filed with the original documents whenever practical. i l' 6.2 A custodian (or custodians) shall be designat'ed to implement'the- ! requirements of Paragraph 6.1 of this Section. I: o i p 1075d' L' '
= _a
% % K L Y.is;rGQ Li;: p) % 5% h;35 6.El %B, ihqi!"T ;h AELEXKWM2iyl}
T. . 1. N ,
- 6lb921tSTb445' PAGE Ok HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTICH SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT. J EBASCO SERWCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 '
INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C c
.QA-I-6 >
QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORD 6-. y., l 6.3 ' QA records may be stored within a temporary ' storage facility;if' they-are protected from damage and loss. This shall include::
~
.l 6.3.1~ Storage:within1 fire-resistant cabinets with a four-hour.
i
' Underwriters' rating or a satisfactory alternative.
,y :f l 6.3.2 Protection from condensation. s 1
6.3.3 Disallowance of' loose -documents. : . Records shall be attached. > d to binders, placed in folders, or similarly maintained. 6.3.4 Specially processed lQA. records 'such as" radiographs,' ! microfilm, etc. shall be stored and protecte:?'in accordance with. q the manufacturer's recommendations. 1 6.4 / A satisfactory alternative to-the requirements of. Paragraph 6.3 of ' 1i this Section -is maintenance of ' duplicate QA records stored in a separate: '1 remote location.
. lR2 {
- 7. 0 DISPOSITION OF QA RECORDS .J l '
.. Y l
Upon transfer of QA records, the' Client or his designee shall. acknowledge in :j writing the receipt of the particular QA records. - ' q
- 8. 0 AUDITS
'{
L Audits shall be performed'in accordance with' Section- QA-III-9 of this Manual l to assure conformance to the requirements of this Section. .
~
l i i. i I
- 1 e
l-l l 1075d 1
,. ,,. , s , - , , _ , . 3 -
MM7U MZ 22 Q RZ C h y .$ 5 2 @ 5 M E Q C O M df M.CcSCIM iE24 MAKE ji i
. s ios'.a usipm.es
, PAGE of HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY - SE CTION K -
- ' SOUTH TEXA$ PROJECT .
- EsAsCO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2:
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DE5CRIPTION - PART C ' mcommonarso QA-III-1 INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES, AND IRAWINGS : 1.0 SCOPE Activities affecting quality.perforised'st the construction' site sha'11be 1 described in written instructions, procedures, or drawings that have:been: developed in accordance with the requirements of this Section. Departmental : ^ procedures which describe the manner 1i which activities affecting quality; are . to' be accomplished are part of the' EbascoL Quality Program.. 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ( 2.1 Where the Ebasco Nuclear- Quality' Assurance Manual designates _an
' individual ~ or' organization' with~ the responsibility Lof performing. . , .,
quality-related functions at the. construction: site, such functions _ shall. be performed in' accordance with written instructions, procedures, or g drawings that have been developed by -the organization.perforising the .. function. These instructions, procedures, and-drawings shall establish'. the' manner of performing the activity in accordance 'wich' the requirements of the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual and of.the - organization performing' the activity. L 2.2 'When documented evidence is required for-the satisfactory; performance of particular activities, checklista, forms, and/or other c appropriate means shall be utilized -_to provide this i evidence., Such a documents shall be signed and dated;by the ' party performing the activity.' 2.3 Ebasco procedures, instructions, or drawings describing activities,
- affecting quality which are qualitative or quantitative-in naturel (ie, _
inspections or tests) shall contain or reference' criteria for_ determining that such activities have been satisfactorily secomplished.. J 2.4 Standard Quality Assurance Procedures, and Standard Site Procedures ; when applicable, shall be reviewed and approved by the -Quality Program Site Manager prior to implementation. ' ' 3.0 DEVELOPMENT OF INSTRUCTIONS, ' PROCEDURES, AND ' DRAWINGS' s 3.1 Instructions, procedures,' or drawings for activities affecting, ; quality at the construction site'shall be developed by the Construction ^ ' and Site Quality Assurance organizations for their ' respective quality-related functions. The appropriate Ebasco Quality Assurance Program lR20 1 Manual shall be used as a guideline:for1their development. In addition,:. -; all Site Quality Control Procedures shall-include' or reference at-least the following:
-l i
1075d e
* - s - ,s ,
1[AiCEE.Cf.idsU 4 SA2MFfiL ih_dij.7I.%.Lil7:4 122'N 535225 7d M U [ s .. = ~ '"
". 2 ' 'g HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY
$'ECTicH .
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBA5CO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 mconconATto QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C :
-QA-III INSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES,' AND IRAWINGS -
a) Identification of characteristics to be inspected.
' b) Identification of the individuals or groups responsible for:
performing the inspection operation. c) Acceptance and rejection" criteria. d) A description of .the method of . inspection, e) Verification of completion and ' certification of inspection. f) ' A record. of the resultsof the> inspection operation. 3.2 The Ebasco Engineering Standards Department. shall develop companyc instructions and procedures of categories, such as Nuclear (N), - pertaining to quality-relate.d functions.
- 3.3 Individual departments / disciplines shall be responsible for' the -
development of their own intradepartmentar/ discipline instructions, procedures, or drawings that establish :the methods- for performing ' quality-related functions. The Ebasco Engineering Standards Department-will provide, upon request, guidance and assistance in developing the documents. 3.4 If so requested by a dept rtment, Quality Assurance Engineering shall act in an advisory capacity during the preparation of internal Ebasco procedures. 3.5 All procedures, instructions, and drawings for activities affecting quality shall be identified, dated, and shall provide' authorized signaturess) of approval. 3.6 To assure that all Ebasco Quality Control and Construction - ' procedures and instructions comply with this Manual. . site-specific requirements, and applicable codes and regulatory requirements, they shall be submitted for review and acceptance to: 'a) the Client or his !- designee for all safety-related activities and b) Ebasco Site Quality lR20 a Assurance for ASME Code activities, prior to implementation. l
}
i 1075d
$ 'l
=~
y M Mi.Ti L W 222 X i R M G W VI: M S f E M M S W A U f ? f N Y N ?
]
+ ,,,,,,,_,, i , * -
,J3 , 7 43 J
- l HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY ~
SECTIOH
$0VTH TEXAS PROJECT-EB A5CO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & '2 mcomponATro . QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C 9;.yyy_y
-1 INSTRUCTIONS,; PROCEDURES, AND IRAWINGS- I
-}
- 3. 7 ~ The Standard - Quality: Assurance Procedures are procedures whieb are .
. . .. q developed by the ~ Client, Bechtel', and. Ebasco ' (as' applicable) and W lR20ja common to each' organization. ' Standard Quality.' Assurance Procedures shalli l be approved by the Quality Program Site Manager prior to ' implementation.. ,
3.8 The Standard Site' Procedures'are developed by Bechtel, Ebasco. and . ;- ; the Client, 'as applicable, for project activities. The Standard Site :1 L, Procedures shall be approved by the Ebasco Con'struction' Manager and, , where required 1 by the. Quality Program Site Manager prior: to . J. implementation. 4.0. DISTRIBUTION AND CONTROL <
, ;j 4.1 Each Ebasco department shall be responsible for. maintaining and d q
enforcing. a written system for.the distribution.and control of- that i organization's instructions, design; ie, rigging drawings) procedures,.f and drawings (other. for activities-affecting quality.than.
; This H j
system shall provide fo: at least- the following * - i 4.1.1 Copies of these documents ,and revisions'thereto'shall be - ll distributed to all appropriate department ' personnel in a timely. manner. j 4.1.2 Outdated and/or superseded documents shall either be destroyed or shall be clearly marked as " Superseded" or"" Void" to
-)
avoid inadvertent use, o 4.1.3 A file of the latest revision of these documents shall be. i maintained. Such a file shall be readily .available to. all .affected ' personnel. , l 4.1.4 A log of the documents shall be maintained. The log shall: indicate as a minimum: ) 2 a) Title of document. 'I I: {, b) ' Document identification' number.
~
l 1 8 { c) Iatest revision number and date' of document presently in , l4 use. . O d) Distribution of document' (Manual Holder No.). I
/!
'I
~1075d e-
- - . . ;J
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ J
J. ~WL. .:SM :::, . L:& C.lKL;@ &pB_.GME2Q'.3.t.N:C:b:. :. > p .G % ,. '. . Ki1C -; j
~' '
h sioshhstok as . paar 4 ,, 4 3; , 1 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY'
$ECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT.
EBASCO SERWCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 mecaponA tto : QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C ' 9^~113 1-INSTRUCTIONS, . PROCEDURES, AND IRAWINGS i I 4.2 A historical file of all:revinions and changes to instructions, .
~
procedures, ar i drawings shall be maintained by the applicable- , organization wponsible for such documents or as may be described in the l applicable organization's procedures. 4.3 All approved Ebasco site-generated' field sketches, construction { procedures, quality control procedures, and special process procedures- . ' shall be transmitted to the Client or his designee for distribution and control in accordance with Section QA-III-2.of this Manual.' 'i i 5.0 CHANGES TO DOCUMENTS Changes to Ebasco documents, the Standard Quality Assurance _ Procedures, and ! the Standard Site Procedures shall be reviewed and approved by' the same . organization responsible for the original document when those changes affect-- ; the original reviewer, unless delegated in writing by the originating organization to another' responsible organization. The' reviewing organization- I shall have access to pertinent background information upon which to. base' their approval and aball have adequate understanding of the requirements and intent ] of the original document.
]
- 6. 0 AUDITS Audits shall be performed in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this: Manual-to assure conformance to.the requirements of this Section.
t 4 0
+
1075d L_____________.___.
fhQK SMM%MIGdONYSE$3OIAA 5 fM*VN* UNS N AI {, . -
. stosattsTDMas 0S ' '
pAgg or j 2 HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY
$ECTloH
$0UTH TEXA5 PROJECT EBASCO $ERVicES - . ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 't j inconponaveo W MME PROM DDMM - PW C yQA_III,2'
.is N
DOCUMENT CONTROL , I
\
1.0 SCOPE' f This Section of the' Manual: establishes the requirements" for the controllof all' projoct ' documents used by Ehasco which have an offect on quality-related; activities. .These requirements apply to, those documents such as t j specifications and drawings, .as well as' site instructions and: site proc'edures,: l' which control or direct ' activities' affecting quality.;
't 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES?
J 2.1 ' The corresponding Department! Heads or their ' designee'sshal1[be~- . , j o responsible for. furnishing' the Clienttor his-designee-with the latest of < ' all Ebasco site generated field sketches, construction procedures,. quality control procedures, and special processi procedures. 2.2 The Client or his designee .shall be responsible for -the ' distribution and control of all construction site design documents,; drawings,. specifications, construction procedures,: quality . control' procedures,- special process procedures, and Standard Site Procedures. . 2.3 Ebasco shall assure satisfactory implementation of the Client;or his. designee's distribution and control. of.Ebasco-generated documents as per the requirements of Paragraph 6.0 of this Section of the Manual.. 2.4 The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or hi,s designee -shall' be ~ responsible for the distribution'and control of site generated Quality, Assurance Instructions'and the distribution ofl Standard Quality Assurance Procedures. 3.0 ISSUANCE OF CONTROLLED DOCUMENTS l 3.1 Establishment-of Document Control Stations 3.1.1 Document control stations shall be established and maintained (, by the Client or his designee. i 3.1.2 Requests by Ebasco for the establishment of new or deletions of existing document control stations for the distribution of . controlled documents 'shall be submitted' by the corresponding . Department Head or Discipline Manager to the' Client or his designee..
~
3.1.3 Requests by Ebasco for additions or deletions of documents .. '! issued to.an established document control station shall be submitted to the Client or his designee.
, j
, 't
'1075d n; , a
,. .~ ..: _. - i :
}?l$ }!N? O 1 NL?b E"+f ? $A A'.d kN0D ?I5 ? ? 5Y N YEI u ; ,' n ,. + ,:V *
*99 , .
foi.s g 2 2k,[4 "~ f cp stica ttstP w se + r '
' + ~' b,
- y . LHOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY'
" SECTION -
- SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT .. d.
- EBASCO $ERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 .y QUAll1Y ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION -~PART Cu mcomponArso -QA-III-2e; -
" ' 1 DOCUMENT CONTROLL , d 3.2 Design' Documents, Drawings,' and specifications +
,.- , . i !
3.2.1 The Client _or his designee shall furnish, distribute,'andE , control all. c'.esign documents, drawings,t and specifications to the '
,j established document control stations in accordance with the : q' '
Client's or his designee's written procedures.= A 3.2.2 Ebasco personnel shall use 'during their work activities the latest design documents,. drawings, and specifications aslprovided: by : l the Client or hisidesignee at~ the appropriate ' document _ control; ,h stations, Lezcept that .-field change: requests in ;anL " Interim Approval"' m- - ., - stage shall be. controlled-by the SenioraResident. Engineer in t accordance with approved site procedures. 3.3 Ebasco Intradepartmental/ Discipline Instruct' ions and Procedures . 3.3.1 Intradepartmental/ Discipline instructions .and procedures ..
.I shall be issued- and controlled in accordance with Section'QA-III-l' of this Manual. , ,
i 3.3.2 , Quality Assurance Instructions and Standard Quality Assurance. . Procedures describing responsibilities [of:SiteL Quality ' Assurance ;) shall be distributed and controlled at the construction, site:in 1
" book" form by the Quality Assurance Site Supervisor. TA master
~
file shall be maintained of all procedures and revisions.'.A~ master list shall'be maintained indicating each person or organization to whom a book of. procedures .has _ beenlissued.' New or - revised procedures will be issued to.each holder of a. procedure
" book." A l receipt system 'sha11Lbe used which requires written acknowledgement of distributed procedures. ; Receipt acknowledgements: .
] ;
shall be maintained for the latest revision. 3.4 Ebasco Site-Generated Procedures and Instructions Ebasco site generated construction, special-process, and quality control procedures and instructions shall be trana'altted to the-Client or his designee. for distribution to"the. established document control stations.
'- Jo 3.5 Field Change Requests 1 3.5.1 A' Field Change Request shall: be submitted to' the' Senior Resident Engineer from applicable site personnel lwhenever conditions .j arise which may warrant consideration by the Client or hisLdesignee 1 of a change in the specified design. !
l j 1075d 6 d J
,y. 9.
s ~w
- 1 9 !
Mo g@ECId%@ZE%iEr3Mjy4Qf@3@@kh@M
'W N' , My A [ D N kNb
, (- >
n .f
"" ~
1
.h 4<mu + 4 . " +"M' ' ' " - '
s tos.a tts7Pw.as lpagg E3' ; ,,C 4 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY "' '
% SE CTION ':
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT .. e EeA5c0 SENCE5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 . L' E , mconeonarao . J QUALITY. ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C: 0 1 ~ a; D, . A-III-2.. -
, , ; -)
DOCUMENT CONTROL ~
- n. ,
>p, ,j-3.5.2 ' The Senior Resident Engineer sha11Lsubmit the' proposed' FiSid[ q Change Requestito the client.'or his designee-for' evaluation,c. .. ,"
disposition,1 distribution [and control by the, Client; or his! designee.- in accordance with the' Client'sLor. his' designee's written proc'eduresa L
' 3.5.2.1 In ' order ato expedite field chang'e requests m
,)
- associated with in process activities :against design"
~
.y
; drawings', fan " Interim' Approvs1" shall? be obtained by the ?. g
~
Senior Resident Engineer fron'the' Client or his. designee /in ' ' f" " G.q accordance .with approved site procedures. - q
, , a 3.6 Field Change' Notice- '
1 q '
. r .;
3.6.1 AL" Field Change Notice"'or a " Field: Sketch Change' Notice"i . l shall be generated by the Senior. Resident Engineer as ,is allowed byJ the design specification 'and shall: be approved," issued, and. , y controlled by the. Senior-Resident' Engineer in'accordance with approved site procedures. ,
]
l 'J
- 3. 6. 2 A Field Change Notice (FCN)for.'a Field Sketch' Change Notice
~
"d i
(FSCN). is to provide construction with a method of ' documenting. ~ J conditions (not: tolerances) that are ;within criteria' allowed. by the ? , ; applicable specifications; .' An FCN or FSCN . shallEnot ' be _used' in lieu ; , of a Nonconformance Report j(NCR) ~or' .a Field ' Change Request. (FCR). y i 3.7 Field Sketches al 3.7.1 Field sketches shall be' prepared, reviewed,' and approved by-the Senior Resident. Engineer or his designee in accordance with J approved ' site procedures. Only : the .following two types of . field. 1 sketches shall be' permitted;toibe utilized by field personnel as a y basis for' the fabrication installation,and. inspection of ' safety-related. items 9 a) Field sketches which have been approved by th'e CIient'or- :: his designee.. ' w-b) Field sketches which the Senior Resident Engineer hasi determined to be~within standard detailing parameters! l established: by specifications prepared lby the Client:or. ; l 1 his designee.' ' ' fl
$. j st
.j I
, ,at l' .< .
j
,7 ,
1 3 1075d ' " s ,' ' ,
'3
. - Q. --; - a .
.1 3 ,y * ,
_3 LL1
G.e] W l]LT11C Q }f i % ~1 2 hD M E*M M E 5 M f '=A*1 f WNWY N ^ * ,l < p ' t
;f If M ,
('
^
-< \ 'stos$HstPw.as ' - " -"Y ' .
9 ,, !/
,e '
'[ 'pade 7 4_' ' .fgy" C, ',
4} '. ~~.. ,' . . .
- }"
U l HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY - '
. S E CTioN ' Il i '
' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECTJ , -
- 0 S
. E B ASCo SERYlCES ' . ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 L T
; QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION '- PART C g mconPonA rso -
, m A '.QA-III-2
" DOCUMENT; CONTROL m
e ,
> y
;;p '
o Of 1
'j
' 3.7.2f LIn process.-revisions of:these, types' of field sketches may be '*
l utilized'provided l .{ 1 L ~ D
.a)-;The in process revision.is-initiated'by the Resident:-
Engineer or his' designee to indicate:that he has i j} ' i determined Lit ' to' be' within iallowable L construction options !
- established.by specifications preparedLby.the Client'or, ? "
his designee. > (y 1 b) ' The in-process revision is controlled and issued-by.the6 1.i t .y . Resident. Engineer or his designee. in accordance with approved site. procedures.. * ]
< w/ ,
y;, c) The in process revision is. utilized for fabrication 6 installation, and in process; inspection onlyi iD l d d) The in process revision lis not utilized for fina1L inspection and seceptance:which shall require'the use'.of a formal. revision of the, field sketch thatlis approved byl the Senior Resident Engineer lor his designee'in '
, accordance with approved sita procedures. ,, ;i 3.7.3 Field sketches shall be transmitted. by the Senior l Resident'
- y. ?!
Engineer to' the Client or his designee for approval:and/or) . distribution to the' established document" control stations "by the' Client or his designee. 4.0 CHANGES TO DOCUMENTS cli J m a
' Changes to Ebasco documents shall, be: distributed 'in thef saae manner 'as the? . 'i original document. Revised documents shall be controlled in-accordance with - '
che requirements of this Section and/or written" procedures'in order to ' avoid ' inadvertent use of outdated docuser;ts. 5.0 AUDITS -lR20: 9"
~ '
1 1 Audits shall be performed in accordance with Section' QA-III-9. of thik Manual-to assure conformance to the requirements of this Section.' R20 l e?
' :)
l 4
.~ 1075d '
,1
.f .p * - * = .ce-A .,g s 4 g .
H L .a l.L. s h usi % i.; M nin & % LE x t.2.1,M E 7 m -n: w >.; 4..u.a:0 3 a d m z i a n : T L M 2 2 :;.3 0
,y s
,.,n
, .L-s
[
~ s ios.ausme.as 5cios[1[ or 5 HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY -
U" " ."
$0UTH TEXAS PROJECT ESA5c0 SENCE5 ELECTRIC GENERATING $TATION' UNIT 31 & 2 .
iwconeonaTao QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C L - o i
.QA-III-6. x ; ;
.i a %1
.NONCONFORMANCES~ 2
'hM 3,
1.O SCOPE - u
-]
ma m% l This Section establishes the requirements for the identification, control, "sind - #< j disposition of items or services found to be'in nonconformance'with the i applicable requirements at the construction site. All: activities describad'inL A dE j\% this Section shall be performed.in accordance with written. instructions and/orv '!, .j procedures. hE ! 2.0 CONSTRUCTION SITE NONCONFORMANCES ' 2.1 Nonconformances at the' construction site may be detec'ted ' byl Ebasco
<( w .
'E
~ Site' Quality' Control,' Site .-Quality) Assurance', or7C construction. The: '
, l#
person identifying a nonconforming condition shall document the condition 1< :< P h" . I ' by initiating a South Texas Project Site Nonconformance Report.~ l [ 2.2 Nonconformances detected shall be reported to:the f sppropriat i e DIO j l ' Quality Assurance organization in accordance with site procedures.' The; ;! responsibility for evaluation of all nonconformances for possible _ - l' _A deportability rests with the Client or his designee. 1 2.3 Quality Control procedures shall require. that ' all. nonconforming :
'1lh
;d items shall be clearly marked or tagged as nonconforming 'and shall bo 4 >
l' segregated when possible. i 2.4 The Nonconformance Report shall then be reviewed' and processed 'in- c L
.' -i.a
'O accordance with approved site procedures. (R20 H
'1
')
2.5 Af ter processing of the .Nonconformance Report , . the . Quality ' Assurance ' ' Site Supervisor or his designee shall distrib.ite copies of the reviewed [ l rb,' and evaluated report in accordance with iSternal Site Quality Assurance ] Instructions. 'i \ a - i 2.6 The appropriate Quality Assurance organization or their designees' R20 shall be responsible to verify by audits, reinspection, or other - t appropriate means that the necessary corrective actions are taken. '. i i
.p .g, i
i l'- , 1075d L ._ ) ;
. 2.. . ,
Tf TW@ ?XEidMMMMMTQ^@@MD p Ql .; '+ 9*# % '# v, ei f P gMyf d' ' Y '
,,E5i x )u~' 6- . pagg . 2l i .
v/, t h ' M," 4 OU5 TON USMT188G Ad0 E'fWER cOMPANU .
' d. I jiU 4 $ E CTION ;
1G.- 1
' cECTRbSOUTH
, ,. . +% *ci
\l .(p EBA5W 5ERVICES GErsERATmGTEXA3 sTATICN UNITS PROJECT'1&2s . if[Ch
>r 3 ggay'yk'@,.O. A 3 h'/ponArto '
QUAUTY. A$$URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C .
,. , w j [- "
1~ 1W MONCONFORMANCES: , h,,d}5 q '
% >}: ,
~f; E
. .[ M. E f 5% lk* '
&, n N k h', " ^
l 4 7: r3 ,3 t 3
^
-y '
3 , y
-f nr :
m .3 , D.c 3.g ME1@ECT!ff4, m
'3 q- A D; 3OM h(. d 1
F . y- . , - y y c 1,t
>\
.9 i A ' h.1 For non6onfotmancep/ detected at 'the consk.ruction site,Jthe '1 based' ' ' , ' l R20) i . i
.M' ' '
Quality Control Site' Supervisor?or,his. designee shall assure thati (k < ' > reinspection \ts performe$)n all itess and service's reported as' . .. j
,l t m
nonconAraing, ByVetssetida shall be performediin'sceordanca with thei ' requirement / of,th14,overning code (s) and 'in'accordar:ce with requirements ; i'
.at least aspctqsjit as. those bd which'the nouconformance, was d9tected.; t"
']}
,J He shall documenMhepatisfactory correction or~ resolution = cf all' s - nonco'n'f,oragnces c) 7 the'dispositioned Noncon&mance Report. : This t (X documentatif).shall. p,rovide sufficient detailed information for. as-b recceds.. r
, y 't I-s<
r
.g 1 1
;,n , j;
,\ ' 3.1.1. Nonconformanc'es not' corrected 'in accordscu' with thel j requirements of the approved disposition to th(Nesconforaenca . q" l 5
,s, , s 3
- Report shall not be ampe,ed by Site Quel $tyi C ontr(13 .'Itehs4 l' '
, ' , ', +' g'servie a shall not bet tecepted by Site- Qualityf Control puil.euch ' ,
q y , ei.se' as 'the ap'propriq corrective action' has ben 4.ccompInhet L s s
, , (f . 7N 4 ,0 REVIEW OF NONCONFOR?iVCE REPORTS .
y
. c{p . j?
- n.
e t i 4 21 Upon hetNipt or initiation cf a N6nconfor:aance Report,lthe Quality .. d Assuranen J ite Supervisor gr his designee shdll perfore the following INOS funy'och isin accorded with QA pmcedurdy aM/cir ' instructions /" ~ I*
,, s
.J** '
o y .$ Log-in thlu, rein:t and record al unique identifying-number on
,4'y g
( the report. \,
- y "]
*/ .o V '
1 4 1 y><3 . I
/., '%2 Route th re/> ort'to the Clien, st his designee who shal'1 I
i sition and N prove-tbe reporf. ' f
, g' (n %']j
,w
' 'j t i @[ l
( , i ~ , - w I t 4.3 7 Receise M re: ort from the Client' or 'his designAd following 9 I ap; oval of the dispositioned report. '" d '
<,( t -
4, s - g[g(,-j U )
) 61..% Upon receipt df the approved Jonc,onforchee Report from; ths. . , ?
(Elen or d4 sigye s,his desithe, the-Quality j{ hall lemn the results' of: theAssurance, revieiauf disfeibute Site, Cupeyvisor <, or' hisJ 'I copig of the report Wr implementation of the apprt,ven disposition :, &F as masary in acco c/(\. r ance with approved procede :cs.f' feb }lQ i[ t ,j y,, f' ' 4 / w jU y'
. ;, j ,a[,(\v. n., 4 u , w-4o
$ % if'y
\ . , .
' .1 "l ,~ '\_t :Q? .}
, . t r_ .
, )h t, ;.
,rl .
V - na
) 3 ,
. n, , ( a. -7 i m
) 5
& .Y \
? .
A 0 1 (f , a , , .; ' Vl'l 'Gyg'Pi .
.c
'O
, jn% e.f .jp 'l J }g ;
4' z' %[u, ' [y oH}.,'g;4.p73dj m T f t[ w 3I ${
~
.g '
.g M 74 4y'
\ls ' ,
n' s . 1 . x pF v
'! h _ _ _ _ _ .
N, .%. . <
- M 4 - ~*' ~- J y-' . s% g M
- l '
-A.sc e
, e soset3tPN.e;,s[. - q(f; [;; ie' - k. * ' '
pacei '3 or'5! j gk't
- a
- t. 4 . ( . h f'y HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY -
SECTION '
' ~C ha # SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ,j E
>d ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 1 g EBAng W m yEs)f QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C 4 mccios4enatto QA-III N' O <
3 NONCONFORMANCES m j
. l -,
,, x t
h '
?
4.2. ffspositions for all nonconformances to'the' design specifications or 4 j other documents originally requiring review and approval of the Client -l or his designee, must have the review an'd approval of the Client or. his ! designee prior to implementation unless otherwise permitted. by approved ' procedures. l 4.3 . Copies of all open Nonconformance, Reports generated in accordance-~ l.
. lR20 - j i
with the requirements of this Section shall be filed'and maintained by the l- i Site NCR Room. l-5.0 DEFICIENCY NOTICES I
-1 5.1 Deficiencies in the quality of items and ' services which either.
violate.the restrictions of Paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3 of this Section of the 3 { Manual or are detected during final inspection.at .the construction site,- and which can be' corrected by reworking ~ or by standard repair procedures .
]
(approved'by the Client or his designee) during the normal' course.of construction, shall be documented on a Deficiency Notice. Copies of all. j Deficiency Notices shall' be transmitted to the Quality Control' Site Supervisor or his designee who will initiate-Nonconformance Reports based on information given in the Deficiency Notices when he determines that i this action is necessary. In this case, the Deficiency Notice becomes a l part of the Nonconformance Report'and only.the Nonconformance Report is required to be resolved. j l l l 5.2 Items discovered to be out-of-tolerance or not to-specification at i in-process inspection checkpoints of an _ inspection process shall be i documented on a Deficiency Notice, provided all conditions listed below j are met: l a) The condition is corrected prior to final inspection / acceptance of the work. i b) The work does not proceed beyond the checkpoir+ until the i ccrrec* ion is made. i c) The cut-of-tderance condition does not reflect on work previwaly accepted. d) No violation of co *e is evident. i l 4
]
, 1075d W_-__-------------x- s.----- u-- m.-- - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - -.-- .- .- ----------s--
,A l}*;$3]DD,?[M UUS.& & U,]'I & btl.& Q ?E H j? &,W?55$R5b.Y}b&ijk,,,%[5h. [ 5 2 [
- y. ,
,s s c, ' m, v >
- -i m o ,
" ' ' , , m . . . - J - , - / ' ' E
, stos.attsTPt34s ; ,
. . . . " 4'1 :or 5 [- o PAos
. HOU5 TON L10HTING AND POWER COMPANYJ $E CTION - Y --
- SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ,.
' EBA5c0 SERVICE 5 . ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 3 2 & 2 ~ .
m'
. iucom ponArso .
- QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAN DESCRIPTION '- PART C ?
o ~ ,
, iq&-III-6 &g .
!NONCONFORMANCES' , ji sn
,f 3. b ;
Deficiencies meeting. the above requirements.: which can easily be reworked f ~ immediately by Construction,' 'or' are - easily. controlled by, and . documented : $ on the Construction work package inspection ~ documentation,: require no~
~
i Ld . documentation, other then on the aforementioned inspection documentation. ./ y . Examples include, but are not limited to:- , g a) ~ Loose bolts, b) Undersized welds. ' c) Coating thickness too low. - M
~d) Surface profile.too low.
Damage which would affect the integrity of an item shall be classified!as a nonconformance and processed accordingly. 5.3 An unacceptable ASME'. Code weld found during the, normal welding / - inspection process shall be' processed and reported on,a."ProcessLData Checklist" form in accordance with approved . Site Quality Control' . ~ procedures. Any unacceptable weld'found after the/ normal" welding /J inspection process is completedf shall be documented as nonconforming in ' q accordance with this Section of the Manual. 1 a 5.4 The processing of Deficiency Notices 'shall be detailed' in approved! .h Site. Quality _ Control procedures. '
.j r
6.0 TREND ANALTSIS OF NONCONFORMANCE REPORTS AND DEFICIENCY' NOTICES Copies of Nonconformance Reports (NCR's) and Deficiency Notices l.(DN's)' from the sources mentioned above shall be transmitted to the Client's Quality Systems / Administration (QS/A). - The Client's QS/A.isi responsible' for the South : i( Texas Project Trend Program' activity in accordance with their~ procedure (s).4 'l This Trend Report shall be reviewed and corrective action taken as nec'essarys li in accordance with Section QA-III-7 of this Manual. ' i
- 7. 0 RECORDS J
i t Nonconformance Reports shall be maintained in accordar.ce with Section QA-I-6,. i [ of this Manual and/or approved Site' Quality ~ Assurance ~ Instructions'._ ' I A: a
-i (i
1075d- , 5
- v. ,
w r ,, ,.a. ,, , _W J. - . . . . 1 "--
, ~
3,UdC..Y[5fM2C,41.'T 2dfi.p?C6*L I,Fl.hCLEl.'Tfli-ZTC.D.CG.7%2Esi!X5,,]V", *; C3.'3,21/M.il O 253.P 3I,3, g i r". .y
'5 I* .
6109e21tSTD$445 '
-PAGE CF 5- 1 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND power COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBASCO SENCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 s -i
. QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C -
inconPonAvro . QA-III-6. ', l NONCONFORMAN2S. ll ' 8.0 AUDITS ' , Audits ~ shall be performed in accordance with Section QA-III-9 Lof this Manual'to 'lR20 . i assure conformance to the. requirements of this Section.~. l' i j 4 e. 9 e 1075d
.7 .
. ~ J 1. . , " .
. .. a ;;_. C "~ . L _ f., a ,. 2.0 ,W % -4. ULT . 7 NW ,ME~5,E. : '
sieseusTmcs pace 1 or 3 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT Es AsCO SERWCE5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 31 & 2 INCORPORATED QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-III-7 CORRECTIVE ACTION-
- 1. C' SCOPE This Section establishes the requirements for the identification, analysis, and implementation of corrective action for safety-related items and services. The Section applies to activities performed at the construction site.
I 2.0 GENERAL 2.1 Corrective action shall be required for identified 'and documented nonconformance(s) associated with safety-related items and services. 2.2 The need for corrective action may be identified from the following I sources a) Inspection activities performed by Site Quality Control. I b) Quality records document reviews. j c) Quality Assurance audits performed by the Quality Assurance organization in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this Manual. < l d) Audits of Ebasco performed by regulatory bodies. lR20 { e) Nonconformances detected at the construction site as described in Section QA-III-6 of this Manual. f) Surve111ances performed by Site Quality Assurance and/or the R20 Client or his designee. ,l l g) Trend Analysis Reports, as identified by the Client or his lR20 ; designee. l 2.3 Determination and review of corrective action items shall be made as early as possible in order to preclude the possible repetition of deficiencies. 2.4 During the review of all corrective action items, consideration shall be given to the training of personnel if it is determined that this was a cause of the deficiency. 1075d '
p: % : y 2 .u.n!. C h M 4 , f .h :k ,7 u:ZWU.l.1%CEf:D . C., L.}:Qf7GC Qyl3GG QQQQ%~i M.:D i < :g , , ,
- ;a ,
t a, > e s tos.atisTPu.as L gj. a.g
, q sl, t
' w%gg ?2 l > c,73 HOUSTON UGHTING AND POWER COMPANY' 6 > ' 5ECTioH . .
' ' 1 ,'
SOUTH TEXA5 PROJECT . t a b' EBAsco SENCES , ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 2 < iucompomateo QUAUTY AS$URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART CE + QA-IkI_7. ,
.r CORRECTIVE ACTION ' , ii
,- g, m
L ,
'2.5' Dissemination-ofcorrectiveactio'ninformationtoresponsibdel '
1:
; individuals'shall be performed'in'a minimum length of: time.L
^ 2.6 ' At the discretion.of the appropriate. Quality Assurance organization,
~ '.lR201
- for corrective ' action items identified' per Paragraph"2;2 of! this :Section,! ="
a correctiveLaction document,may.be. issued; 1This documentishall'beLusedy a.>'
. when deficiencies detected are not isolated ' cases and;when they;are of; ' sufficient magnitude to warrant a documented" supervisory review in s accordance with ' approved Quality Assurance' procedureso' r ' instructions. .
This. document'goes beyond:the standard audit action response required. by' audit . re port s. -
' / '
r.
'2. 7 For programmatic; deficiencies that arelidentifiedl thh idngth of; 1 time for corrective action response shall be:in accordance with: sites ,
. IR2 0 -
requirements / procedures.
,o .
l 'i 2.8 It shall' be the responsibility of the cognizant Quality Assuranc'e . 'lR20 organization to assure that- all required corrective " action 'is implemented y in a timely manner. L 2.9 An assessment of the' severity of deficiencies detected ' by Ebasco . lR20s s shall be made in accordance with Company: Procedure N-23 or approved site procedures. ' lR20'- 3.0 DETERMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION METHODS 3.1 Nonconformance Reports Generated at the Construction site. 3.1.1 il Site Quality Control shall perform direct inspection of ' activities at the construction site las required by: Section QA-III-11 ].j of this Manual. ' ' j 3.1.2 Nonconformances noted during these inspection activities . shall be documented. on a Nonconformance Report :in :accordance' with 1 Section QA-III-6 of this Manual. Site. Quality: Control'sha11Lverify-that the corrective action which hasL been stipulated on the . .
~
n completed form is implemented. Site l Quality Control'shall maintaini a log of all required corrective action'and shall' review thi's ' periodically to assure the resolution of deficiencies and - ! 1 implementation of required corrective action. 4 l 1 i 1EA i
' " i j 1:' j r
c.
- MM:.:n , .. u.:z 7 .M i"* " Y2:1.: D.E i &.2iS t. 3,;&T2:'d -
"T? ; D V L.:. W M D & M
, 2 S109 4t($7PM.45 . '
bAGE' OF~ ,i HOUSTON UGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXA$ PROJECT EBA5CO SERVICES LC G NERAM STADON UNm 1 & 2 inconeonarso- QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-111-7. CORRECTIVE ACTION 3.2 Regulatory Agency Audits lR20? l
. Audits of construction-site activities may be performed by the appropriate regulatory agencies. Ifl corrective action is required
,lR20 as a result of one of these audits, the appropriate Quality l .{
' Assurance organization shall be responsible for obtaining a response
~
~
l from the cognizant. individual (s) for submittal to the auditing body, i 4.0 FINAL VERIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ' ACTION IMPLEMENTATION , rResppnsibility.foroverification' of the' implementation-of-corrective action (s). R201 shall be in accordance with site requirements / procedures. i
- 5. 0 DETERMINATION 'AND ANALYSIS OF QUALITY TRENDS Copies of Nonconformance Reports (NCR's), Standard Deficiency Reports (SDR's), '
Management Corrective Action' Requests (MCAR's), and other appropriate site generated corrective action docunents shall be transmitted by the: Site ! Quality Assurance organization to the Client's Quality-Systems / Administration. . (QS/A). The Client's QS/A is responsible for the South Texas Project Trend l Program activity in accordance with their procedure (s).~ The Quality Assurance Site Supervisor shall review the applicable portions of this' Trend Report for l-reporting of repetitive Code-related conditions and shall issue a Standard lR20 t Deficiency Report as appropriate. l 6.0 AUDITS l ]. Audits shall be performed in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of this Manual! IR20 1 l to assure conformance to the requirements of this Section. I l i j l i 1 1
]
j 1075d '
, a r
__Y__ ~ _ . _. - $
CTMl G D L 3 53L M 7?iB.h &d Y' T 7 % Q:XW?%2fMTM;MM : on K:W yiWXKhW2.Q
.v -
41094 fl5T PIO.45 lpAgg'" . oF
!q HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY:
SECTION ! SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBASCO SERWCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 INCORPORATED QUAUTY A$$URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION '- PART C
- gg;III-8
> CONTROL OF SPECIAL' PROCESSES 1.0 SCOPE
, i This Section of the Quility Assurance Mar. cal' establishes the requirements for ' w.
1 the control of.special processes:st(the construction site..= Included'herein are provisions for. the establishment; of critical process. parameters qualification of the processes; and' training"and qualification of personne1' who perform the ' functions covered by this .Sectioni , 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES ' y 2.1 The Quality. Assurance organization shalli.be responsible:for thu x ' :j
-following:. ,
2.1.1 Developing and implementing Sit'e Quality Control procedures; if and for qualifying personne1~ to_ perform inspection of'special ' processes.
~
2.1.2 Provid'ing technical assistance' for procedure review'and-development as required. 2.1.'3 . Qualifying personnel performing nondestructive examination. - 2.1.4 Performance of. audits -in accordance with1Section' QA-III-9 of this Manual to assure conformance to; the requirements of; this-Section. 2.2. The Materials Applications organization shall- be. responsible for~ the following: a) Development and qualification of welding: procedures. . b) Providing-technical assistance for' procedure review and~ development as required by Site Quality Assurance and'. Site-Quality . Control. - ' c) Qualification of welders and welding operators. d) Development of heat treating procedures. 2.3 The Construction organization shall be responsible for the.following:, 2.3.1 Implementing welding and heat treating procedures.
. 1075d.
, - - ~ '
r
- .__-__-___-:L--
W 'S M.WALBCMBMWLCMMMIL5555DESAN gr t ' a ' l$ " J-- D o W ic y
'W '
f{. ! ,
? :-
, .~
. m .,
' r- #;- W ' '
~
A Y ^ ' N#' M' ? ' ' s '" T u' , e ns.austamos - < --
-PAsg.'2' ,op"'3'-
m HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY. SEcTION J "E
. SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
.$ ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2'-
EaA5CO SENCE5
. mcomponarso . QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAN DESCRIPTION '- PART C ;
-QA-III_8- ,
CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES: c [3 g
, i.
w
' }( I 2.3.2: L Developing;and implementing proceduresffor othsr/activisies; classified as special. processes (eg,Leadweldingi chemicalicleaning, ;
flushing) land for qualifying-personnel to perform-those' functions.- I 2,4 The Ebasco Site NDE Laboratory;Kan extension of;the Materials . n
; Engineering Laboratory, :is responsible .for ' developing and implementing l'V nondestructiverezamination proceduresi T '
3.0 METHODS FOR CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES' I m 3.1 Site Special' Process' Procedures : T
, ,m
< ; c.
' 3.1.1. Nondestructive examination procedures used at- thei construction site shall be developed by the Site NDE Laboratory and:
.J shall be ' reviewed 'and accepted' by the' Quality Assurance. Site - Supervisor or his designee, to' assure complianc'e to.the- requirements - of all applicable codes and standards;: asia _ minimum. : Conformance to?, 1 these procedures and qualification requirements shallibe verified through audits. and surveillance performed [by Site .QualityL Assurance. -{: , 3.1.2 -All welding procedures used'at.the construction site' shill:be: prepared by the New York Materials Applications and Welding organization. EThe weld procedures test naterial shall be prepared
~ , i either at the home office or the construction; site'according to _d instructions for qualification provided by the:New1 York Materials Applications and Welding organization. ' >
3.1.3 construction' procedures for, site implementation of'weldingi and heat treating requirements shall be. developed ~ by the Site' ' Welding Superintendent or his designee. '
~
3.1.4 All welders installing safety-related components shall be
- j a ~
qualified according to appropriate codes and standards. ?-Welderf '
' qualification shall be performed by the. Site Welding Superintendent-or his designee. - Verification of conformance to procedure and- '!
operator qualification requirements shall: be performed in accordance 1 1 with site' procedures by Site Welding Superintendent (or his . . . y3 ' 'N designee) surveillance, Site' Quality Control-inspection,7 and/orl Site ^ Quality Assurance audit and surveillance functions. ,; l 4 d o
. ,O!
.i
- 1075d- d
~
?
... , .. . , T- .
; "u rGw,92II'm~'iL~" E&.=1 c. .:J{ . (.;.N"c f7; g.,.c, .72.L. . f.J c ~4 ;. .
, . 1 1
4 I i 3 ~ 3' 6 809-21($7 P)4.85 .PAGE OF HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 '1 EBA5c0 SEWICES INCORPORATED QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION , PART C QA-III i
-(
CONTROL OF SPECIAL PROCESSES- j 3.1.5 Construction procedures for~ welding, heat treatment, and l d other special processes shall be reviewed and> accepted by.the Ebasco
~
lR20 -l and/or the Client (or his designee) Quality Assurance / Quality Control l organization. All comments resulting from such reviews shall be resolved prior to procedure implementation. , d 3 4.0 RECORDS i i Records pertaining to this Section shall be maintained in accordance with f Section QA-I-6 of this Manual. i 1 3 1 4 i j
,l l
)
1 l i
. J i
.I
{ i i 1075d , i _. :.-._ s - . . _ - .
v: . . y ,, r g.
= ~
7 ;.;; y, c7 cg.. q- .
- , m.;g-a+....-..s.- ,. w ~ . r. 7 p 7..a.
.a .. s a . m - ;. . >, -
.u...
7, - y.
. a.u 7-.-
7.
. .- a , . . , .c ,
1 8' s os.21($7P)4 85 PAGE oF HOUSTON LIGHTlh3 AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 , ESASCO $ERVICES INCORPORATED QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-III-9 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS 1.0 SCOPE Quality-related activities at the construction' site and Ebasco home office are-independently audited, This Section establishes the requirements and .l Suidelines for the preparation, performance, reporting, and follow-up of l quality assurance audits. Ebasco audit activities shall be performed'in lR20-accordance with the requirements of the appropriate Quality Assurance Manual and applicable site or home office procedures. ! I 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Ebasco Audits l l Audit activities will be conducted in accordance with the IR20 ; requirements of the applicable Ebasco South Texas Project Quality. l l Assurance Programs / Manuals - EIR-1001 or ASME Section III. l 2.1.1 The Ebasco Quality Assurance Site Supervisor or his designee from the Site Quality Assurance organization shall perform audits of ASME Code construction site activities. !R20 2.1.2 The Quality Assurance Engineering Supervisor of Auditing (N.Y.) shall perform home office audits of Ebasco site activities. lR20 li 2.1.3 A committee chaired by the Quality Assurance Consulting
! Engineer conducts audits of the Ebasco Materials' Applications lR20 and Welding and Quality Assurance organizations.
l~ 2.2 Client Audits l l The Client or his designee shall be responsible for the performaner l
; of construction site audits of Ebasco, Construction, and Quality lR20 Assurance / Quality Control activities to assure compliance to this l l
Manual. Audit activities, shall be in accordance with the Client's l program.- l 3.0 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AUDITS PERFORMED BY EBASCO lR20 3.1 Audit Personnel 3.1.1 Audit personnel shall be independent of direct responsibility for performance of the activity being audited. 3.1.2 Audit personnel shall be qualified to perform quality assurance audits based on experience and training as described in Quality Assurance Procedure QA-C.3.
, 1075d l _ , , . _ . .
- d. ' ' ~ . MV~I h[I62A ,.dCMi?,VK .
UKAn ECii2L g 5_.. a ..?
- 'lE . E~.fECL . ,? j
- ..r . , ,, .
6109 21($7P)4 85 PAGE OF [ HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION - N SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 EBA5CO SERVICES lNCORPORATEo
- QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C @.171 9
- QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIIS j l
I 3.2 Training and Orientation q 3.2.1 Audit. personnel shall have experience and training or . I orientation to assure their competence for performing audits. The competence of personnel to perform audits shall be developed by one or more of the following methods: a) Providing personnel with working. knowledge of appropriate regulatory documents, practices, codes, and standards.
. b) Training or orientation in general and. specialized methods of planning and performing audits.
c) On-the-job training under direct supervision of a Lead
.' Auditor. .
3.2.2 The requirements for training and orientation of auditors shall be in accordance with Quality Assurance procedures. 3.3 Proficiency of Lead Auditors 3.3.1 Lead Auditors performing audits shall maintain their proficiency through one or more of the following methods: a) Regular, active participation in the audit process. b) Review and study of codes, standards, and procedures i related to Quality Assurance Programs and program auditing. ! c) Participation in orientation or training programs. I i 3.3.2. The Director Quality Assurance or his designee shall evaluate Lead Auditors in accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure QA-G.3 l J to assure that the Lead Auditors are maintaining their proficiency. j 9 3.4 Scheduling of Audits 3.4.1 Audits shall be initiated as early in the life of the project .i' or activity as practicable in order to assure timely implementation of the applicable Quality Assurance Program requirements, and to assure effective quality assurance during construction activities.
, j i
1075d - 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ - i
a aka.1l'l
^
- .lw A'L;.]U5:~ ' l lb.~.< Quld5;ll .?b T,fl l N : N l.l::...1: ? ? J ' .
1 e sos.21($TP)4-85 PAGE OF HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION i SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT j ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 EBASCO SERVICES QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C - QA,III-9 i l INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS q s 3.4.2 Audits shall be regularly scheduled on the. basis of the status and safety importance of the activities to assure conformance, to the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program. Applicable elements of the Quality Assurance Program shall be audited by the i home office Quality Assurance Engineering.and the Ebasco Management- 1 Audit Committee at least annually or once within the life of the - '] activity, whichever is shorter. l
' l 3.4.3 Audits performed by Ebasco Site Quality Assuranc at the , , l ; construction site shall be scheduled in accordance with the Standard ,
j Quality Assurance Procedures requirements., . __ 1 J !j 'i 3.4.4 Supplemental audits shall be conducted when: l a) Significant changes in the Quality Assurance Program are' ; made. 1 b) There is evidence of significant noncompliance to the Quality Assurance Program. c) An assessment of the effectiveness of the Quality Assurance Program is requested. d) It is necessary to verify implementation of corrective action.
; e) It is considered necessary by the Quality Program Site i Manager.
3.5 Planning of Audits Preparation for audits shall include the development of a written audit plan of standard format which shall include or identify the following: a) Audit scope. b) Requirements and applicable documents. l c) Activities to be audited. < d) Organization to be audited. e) Tentative audit schedule.
+
1075d
yy
< ;g~ n y.&ny;g ,n ,
gw.mm.. 3ua ;m
. ./ m u.p.u - .7.,.;.>7p ,,w3
- p.u < w .. ... n .. 4 . 3a7a-.
-. a . .we
'1
, .c. . . . .
, sios-mstpa4s PAos 4 oja HOUSTON L!GHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 ESASCO SERYiCES INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C kA-III-9
. QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDITS f) Approved written procedures.and/or checklists which assure that-the organization will be audited to the extent necessary. These procedures and/or checklists shall provide for verifying corrective action of deficiencies identified'in previous audits. l Audit procedures and/or .checklista may be developed as part of a l general audit program and need'not be unique for each audit, i
3.6 The Audit Team 1 i l , 3.6.1 The audit'shall.be performed by one or more individuals. A l
-qualified Lead Auditor shall'be established.as..the., team leader for j audits when teams are comprised of two or more auditors. When j audits are performed by only one individual, that individual shall i
be a qualified Lead Auditor and considered to be the team leader. 1 lj The team leader shall be responsible for: ; I a) Orientation of the team. b) Assuring communication between the. team.and'the J l organization being audited. 1 . c) Coordinating the preparation and issuance of audit . l reports, i I d) Establishing the pace of the audit. l
- l. '
3.6.2 The team leader shall assure that the team is prepared prior-to performing the audit. Information such as appropriate procedures, manuals and prior audit reports shall be made available to the team members. Each auditor shall be provided with any appropriate audit plans, procedures, or checklists necessary to performing the audit. 3.7 Audit Notification l The organization to be audited shall be notified of a scheduled audit and the scope of the audit. Such notification shall be given ! a reasonable time before the audit is to be performed.
! 3.8 , Audit Performance 3.8.1 Checklists and/or written procedures prepared during audit planning shall be used to conduct the audit.
3.8.2 An informal pre-audit conference shall be arranged at the audit site in order to confirm audit scope and' discuss the audit plan. 5 1075d
>.;s -~. p a.
_. a . . c.y . ,
.m..
~g.;
..m ,.7. - g ,.
- n. , e . ....m, .o:. . .
, _v
- .:ae_:n;.c.:.
peg aa?!.;.M. n.w
. .my ,w,.mu.u p.
;r y ,;.
a s. a .a . ,a.: ,..L,a 2 sios.aitsrea es PAos 5 y8 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION I SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 EBASCO SERYlCES QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C 1 m Co R POR AT ED QA_III_9 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIIS l I 3.8.3 A post-audit conference shall be conducted to: 9 a) Inform those audited of the audit results. l b) Assure' understanding of audit results. t ! 3.9 Reporting of Audit Results 3.9.1 An audit report shall be compiled and shall be signed by. the. ! audit team leader. The audit report shall provides a) Description of the audit scope. 4 I b) Identification of the auditors. 1 c) Persons contactei. ] I l d) A summary of the audit results, including an evaluation i statement regarding the effectiveness of the Quality { Assurance Program elements which were audited. l li ' 1 e) Detailed description of Quality Assurance Program ' deficiencies and causes thereof where possible.
- f) Recommendations for correcting program deficiencies or
! improving the Quality Assurance Program, if possible.
3.9.2 The audit report shall be issued in a timely manner as defined in the applicable Quality Assurance procedure, but shall not exceed 30 days from the post-audit conference. 3.10 Audit Follow-up 3.10.1 A response to the audit report shall be prepared by the responsible individual and submitted within the required time' period as established in the audit report, but shall not exceed 30 days. The response shall state the corrective action taken or to be taken, and the date of completion. The audit team leader, or another qualified Lead Auditor or the management of.the auditing group shall review the response for acceptance. As nee.essary, subsequent responses may be required to verify completion of corrective action.
-1075d
~
Li;?l5N Q cl.:...? ? Adh:A? . 55A5 eN A y E udSEI? UNI 1lW .50 ll5 5:.l-ANN A n sios ausrpa.as paos 6 ep 8 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT - ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 EBASCO SERV CES QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C INCORPORATED QA*III QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIIS 3.10.2 Follow-up action shall be performed by a qualified Lead
. Auditor to:
a) Assure that the written reply to the audit report is - received. - b) Assure that corrective action is' identified and scheduled for each program deficiency. c) Confirm that deficiencies are resolved'and corrective-sction, when necessary, is accomplished..
. q 3.10.3 Follow-up action may be.. accomplished through written communication, re-audit, or other appropriate means.
3.10.4 Follow-up action taken shall be documented. 3.11 Trend Analysis of Audit' Reports l
; The Client is responsible for analysis of the available data with l R20-respect to quality trends, and reports-the result in accordance with. ; their program. Distribution of the trend analysis reports shall be made by.the Client to the appropriate Ebasco levels of management for review and assessment.
4.0 SPECIFIC AUDIT REQUIREMENTS -- 4.1 Management Audits 4.1.1 A committee chaired by the Quality Assurance Consulting Engineer is responsible.for conducting audits of Ebasco Materials Applications and Welding and Quality Assurance' functions to determine compliance wi.th the Ebasco Quality Assurance Program - requirements. This committee is made up of personnel not in the Quality Assurance organization and who are qualified in accordance with criteria denoted in Ebasco Nuclear Procedure N-24. These I audits will also include evaluating quality assurance policy ' effectiveness and assuring that appropriate implementing procedures are available and are being complied with, l 1075d
,,,:. n 9 .w . . . ,,
m -.y . ; q - g y9.y y ~ n ymy m , y y v ,, vg. , yn; 39 g.;~7 >
- y, ,
;t .u44 ..L.. .-. .z x,...a,
.:au w uz n.w...a:.. ..<.d.a:4c.nh.neM A .. :w a 'n : n. _.w.2.d...sK-4 w .
..[ . - , ,m cs- . g, j q s_ ,
- 7 8 6109 21(STPM 85 ,
PAcg or HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT Et.ECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 EBAsCo sEmCES INCORPORATED QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-III-9 QUALITY ASS *JLANCE AUDI'IS 4.1.2 This auditing shall be accomplished on an annual basis'in.
~
accordance with the requirements of Ebasco Nuclear Procedure N 24. ~ The management audit committee shall be comprised of at least two. qualified representatives from either Ebasco Constructors Inc or Engineering, and the QA Consulting Engineer. Each committee -i representative shall be appointed by.the respective group Vice President; however, no committee member can be directly engaged i' in any policy-making or administrative phase of the.Ebasco Quality. Assurance Program, but'shall be knowledgeable in the general-area of. , quality assurance. The committee shall be directly responsible to f rthe Vice President Corporate Quality-Programs.,
.;]
4.1.3 The' committee shall prepare an auditfreport for each' audit. l performed. This report shall be submitted directly to the Vice j President Corporate Quality Programs, with copies ~ to other ,4
- appropriate parties. , :l i 4.1.4 The Vice President Corpora.te Quality Programs shall be l responsible for Lnforming the concerned Ebasco management of the .
j! results of the audits performed by the committee. He shall also be' responsible for initiating the implementation of any changes or-1 corrective action deemed necessary to improve the effectiveness of .j the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.
~
4.2 Audits by the Quality Assurance Organization
- 4. 2.1 Site Quality Assurance shall audit the various ASME' Code.. lR20 I
; quality-related activities performed by Ebasco organizations on the.
construction site in accordance with the requirements of the ASME~ lR20 Section III Quality Assurance Program, the applicable Site Quality ' l j i' Assurance Instructions, and the Standard Quality Assurance -) Procedures. ; R20 ) 4.2.2 Home office Quality Assurance Engineering will. conduct audits. and evaluations of the construction site annually in accordance with the applicable Ebasco Quality Assurance Programs and Quality ' lR20- 1 i Assurance Procedure. l-i 1
?
i 4 1 - 4 1075d
,- m. ,, u . - - - - +
2:,:2 ::& ..- < " . Lai :::.c ,w . Q, . ..;;.u.. .X ;Ca.-~3 y. '
- .dk222."uQ.. :.~.D.Cu.R sios.austen.as paos 8 ,, 8 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 EBASCO SERVICES mconeonATeo QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA_yyI-9 QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDI15 5.0 AUDIT RECORDS
. 5.1 Records generated. during audit preparation, performance, or follow-up shall be retained by Ebasco in accordance with the applicable requirements lR20 of Section QA-I-6 of this Manual and/or approved Quality Assurance procedures. Such records include: lR20 a) Audit plans and checklists, b) Audit reports.
c) Written replies to audit reports. d) Status of required corrective action.
- , e) Other documents which support audit findings and corrective j action as appropriate.
f) Records of auditor training and experience. lR20 l; 5.2 Records of training and experience of auditors shall be maintained 'i for all personnel who are performing audits or who have previously i performed audits. These shall be retained for the same period of time as required for the audit reports with which the auditors are associated. { Maintenance and retention shall be in accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure QA-G.3. 1 l s i i, i s 5 l 1075d ' _.__a__ __.__ms__ ___
1%3d W Z M d* , M. N k " *
' g
.f s
p; ,
, N;; ;y ,
'{
Nei i ans6s u ? '@ " ~ 1 ' or I3 "s ' e
- pass HOUSTON LlGHTING AND POWER COMPANY . id SECTION ' <,
SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT : ELECTRIC GENERAllNG STATION UNITS 1 & 2' ...
, . y. c.H
- ESA$CO SERVICES.- ,
1-f mconmonatso QUAL.lTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION.- PART C
.Q&-III-10: 1 IDENTIFICATION. AND' CONTROL OF > ITEMS!
, n l
N U,1, ! 4 1.0 SCOPE l q
' "R 1.1 This Sect':lon establishes the requirements for the.-identification and: , control of safety-related items 'at the construction. site.'
x. 1.2l The activities describ'ed herein shAll be performed'in' accordance- - *l , with written' instructions,-procedures, and/or drawings'that have been1
. o?
developed and a'ccepted in accordance with.the requirements of ' Section QA-III-1. of' this Manual' . - w 2.0. RESPONSIBILITIES - 2.1. Site Quality Control'shall be responsible to perfora thelfollowing; "' functions in'accordance.with written procedures: * *
' .:U ql a) Assure that items' received from the Client. or; his ' designee ;at
. the construction. site are properly l identified and are .
accompanied by. appropriate documentation ' traceable to the = items.c 1 b) Assure that all. item's shall be hhysically. identified in . accordance with Paragraph 3.0 of this Section of the Manual,' and. 4) appropriate written procedures.
-l
... t i a
c') Assure that' identification of items sha11L be transferred to s d inspection and test records and ~as-built ' documents in a manner .
'd sufficient to provide' the required traceability. '
i d) Assure that items are handled andistored in accordance~ withithe; requirements of Section QA-III-14' of this Manual'so as , to t F maintain identification. L1 u 2.2 Audits shall be performed in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of,
' 1 +1
" 'R20 9 this Manual to assure conformance to the requirements.of this Section. 3.0 GENERAL i d^ 3.1. Documented Quality Control procedures require that items shall be physically identified by the following means, as applicables j j 1 a) Stenciled or etched markings 4
* , , 7. H
,...i b) Strip markings . _ .
e 9 ij
;l l
1075d . .
. + :9 -'T#' '
._ , ,[d p g
d __ _ _ ___m___ _ _ _ l a i--- 1--- -- -i- " - ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' ' " ~ ~ ~ __ _.
,a,.6 Aa.2 - ' - '
~
..;, : A. K.:& > RRus. G u d @ .,~a. % .L;~ :u Mi .JNXDX"~ 23h.LZ.
.l
'- ~
6109-21(STPk3C8 ' 3 PAGE OF HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT. , EsAsco SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 l mconPonatzo QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 0ESCRIPTION - PART C
%-III-10 IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL OF ITEMS c) Impriated tape i d) Tagging e) Stamping ,
f) Color-coding g) Records traceable to the items h) Frocedural control
- 1) Other appropriate means in accordance with approved Site Quality Control procedures 3.2 When it is impractical to physically identify ' individual small items, these may be identified as to heat numbers, batch, lot, or .
specification by applying markings to bags, bins, : tanks, or other suitable containers. 3.3 Identification of items shall provide the required degree of k traceability to pertinent documents. i 3.4 All markings shall be clear, unambiguous, and indelible and shall not affect the function of the item when applied. 1 3.5 When an item is subdivided, markings'shall be transferred to each part of the item. l i 3.6 Markings shall not be obliterated or hidden by surface treatment or coatings unless other means of identification is substituted. ! 3.7 All safety-related items and materials shall be controlled by one or ' more of the followings a) Uniquely identifiable and traceable. i b) Physically marked items are not traceable but readily re t rievable. c) Physically identified as to type and users tested. d) Identifiable as to type, by some physical characteristic or other administrative control. 1075d
, ,. . . ~ . - +
. y,3.- ~y emp ,u -
,3 .
, 7
. 1 % .* ;.-r n s,,y pr 3:...;s.%r
, ._,i
. y y;as: g .:-ws q w.;ry&.:
y2 M s.;.s.ggg:y . G y y,
. g r zl;.,fp :,y; dwwkh L;;7;ga w.;m-.
..rQ,)i.*y "3.g,7 3.ssn ,.ak, J. 77,,
*. . . ,-3
" k4.y;.; G e Y,; n n,~.3 3- z..e, =y4 e
- y ,
' .1 cp >
.. s 2 <
,y. .. s . _.
~
sics.gitston.as
, Pace 3 .orJ3 1 H HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANYL SECTION l SOUTH TEXA5 PROJECT
~]
EBASCO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2J .. o mcommoaavao QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .- PART C s QA-III-10
IDENTIFICATION AND CONTROL '0F ITENS - '
.]
4
,)
q' 4.0 RECORDS * ' Records pertaining to this Section' shall' be maintained 'in accordance withe-l- 1Section QA-I-6 of: this Manual. J 1
- t. c 1 I<
1-l .. 4 1 h a i l a
.l l l 1 s l
l l l 1 i l 1 l l n (
-)
i 1075d
... . ~ , . .,;. :
_ - _ _ . _-~ -.
y ,),'?.M s Cl'.Egif3dfdE2dKZU.S5CigiM CEEAEK.S.JA.iM .,:!. T L5 f .M.n#1ka d
#' f P s tos-msTPk3 45 '
Pact '1 or 3 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION ' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT : EBAt9 SEREES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 : mcodeonateo QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C - QA-III-11 INSPECTION 1.0 SCOPE
- 1 This Section establishes the requirements 'for the inspection of safety-related items and. services at the construction site as necessary to assure compliance '
y with documented instructions, procedures, specifications, drawings', codes, . and ' :] regulatory requirements. . 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Site Quality Control shall be responsible for the following: a) / Development of written procedures for the: inspection of . safety-related items and services which list the _ required inspection activities when existing inspection documents such as - ! standard specifications and drawings do not provide an adequate basis for inspection. . j b) Submittal of inspection procedures to Ebasco Site' Quality .i Assurance for review and acceptance in accordance with ' Section QA-III-1 of this Manual. c) Preparation of reports for all inspections made. { d') Approval processing of inspection procedures and revisions thereto. 2.2 Site. Quality Control shall be responsible for performing inspection . activities in accordance with appropriate inspection documents. , 2.3 Qt. lification of inspection personnel shall be in accordance with applicable Quality Assurance procedures and Paragraph 4.0 of this Section i i of the Manual. 2.4 Audits shall be performed in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of lR20 this Manual to assure conformance to the requirements of thi's Section. l 3.O GENERAL - f 3.1 Inspection documents shall be prepared based upon the quality j requirements contained in specifications, quality control documents and procedures, and applicable codes and standards. i 1075d m .. . , - . . . , -
k' khhh.dhit , i
'1 3.b b LidA b d 55 2'E O*_h M k.h M k hII h I'k E4"44,hkh.,3( h hbjfNih 1 Mtd [
j' ,
,v ,
, 8
, .1, '
'i' , + v Jp ,
,q " Q <-
6; e a-b 7 g l .A 4 * * " ' ' N- " 4*
, , i t '.- , - h "' ' '
4109 2HSTPIO44 .- .i i +
- 'pAgg: ,, 'oF d
HOUSTON OGHTING AND POWER COMPANY' o SECTIOh i SOUTH TEXAS PROJECTE o , o a EB'ASCO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 - a y ; QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRARI DESCRIPTION - PART.C. swconPonArso,
, QA-III-11 !
. ;1NSPECTION: ' '!
+ .
L 5$ w . 3.2 If asndatory!. inspection h'old points are reqEiredi the specific hold points shall be indicated onethe:inspectionLdocuments.' ~ P . a 3.3 Inspection' documents shall specify or reference"as I Ainiaua the activities to be performed, seceptance- criteria, 'by whoa'activitiest are 1 performed, and the ' sequence in which the activitiesJare Lto be: performed.- 3.4 Where mandatory inspection Lholdl points are indicated on inspection? documents or procedures, work may: continue' beyond a: hold; point onlylwithL 1 the written approval of the Quality Control. Site . Supervisor" or his; ! qualified designee.- 3.5l Inspection reports shall' indicate the acceptability:statusTof the items or services inspected with respect to : meeting.the: applicable L < - quality. requirements. f , L 3.6 When inspections are to be performed (by use of a'. sampling program-(ie, to determine the acceptability .of a.. group of' like-items based upon . the resultsiof an_ inspection 'of a representative: number of Litems'. from ' thel group), the sample size, shall be identified; on the ) inspection Ldocuments. L Justification for this sampling shall be' based :upon recognized ' standard . construction practices and successful past experience, as'we11Las;the' complexity and function of the activity,.ites, Lor ^ service to be'in'spected. 4.0 TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION OF INSPECTION ~ PERSONNEL-L 4.1< Inspection; personnel shall: have Eexperienee and Ltraining : to , assure - their competence for performing inspection. ! = The' competence of personnels , to perform inspections shall- be. developed by one or more of the following methods: ' ' a) Providing personnel with working knowledge of ' appropriate-regulatory documents, practices, codes, . and standards.- b) Training or orientation in general and' specialized:sethodstof planning and performing inspections. c) On-the-job training under direct supervision of an experienced : qualified inspector. L .
'i 1
0
.1075d 0 4 l- A p """
,.y %
Nf W l.' * * '
?f .. t '
(-' > I t
% 3 p W pz:5X2 :.=EEilnWMMpi.W~@k;.MiD,2 a.Eir.GlHMEbL h@g %%i.5K,Qiga::.s.t
- y. ,
, o e. ,,
.v
, , 7 is tis.ausTpu.as .
- 5'
,', phog , o r '-
HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY:
., SOUTH TEXA3 PROJECT! SECTION.
'ES A5C0 SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2
. mconeonarso QUALITY A$$URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION.- PART C :
.QA-III :
' INSPECTION ,
ie 4.2 The requirements for training Jand. qualification o'f inspectors- shall be in accordance with ' applicable Quality Assurance ~ procedures,Eandi > qualification ~ of inspectors shall' be based upon consideration of: the;' > , following:- 4 4 o ..
.a); Records 'of education and' experience.
, j]3 h b) . Test rendits, where applicable.
c) Results of ' capability determination. y 1 m 4.3 n Site . Quality Contro11shall jeiresponsible Pfor-scheduling andi , U coordinating training for qualityLcontrol personnel in' r.dvance of. implementation of. the: applicable inspection- documents.j This training-shall be conducted inL sufficient, detail and with sufficient frequency to? assure that the personnel responsible-;for. the. inspection fully understand: the requirements. contained in the applicable inspection' documents.-
~
4.4 Inspectors . performing inspections 'shall maintainL their proficiency" through one or more of the. following methods:
-a) Regular, active participation inlthe inspections process.- l b) Review and study of. codes, standards, .and procedures: related to Quality Assurance Programs and program Inspection.'.
4.5 The Director Quality Assurance; or 'his designee. shall'r periodically . . evaluate inspectors in accordance with applicable- Quality Assurance : 1 procedures to assure that. the inspectors are maintaining .theira proficiency. - a 5.0 R CORDS
-.E.
, r i
5.1 All inspection documents sha11L be' maintained in.accordance with
-i Section QA-I-6 of this Manual. J 5.2 Records of training, experience, and certification- of inspectors. I shall be maintained for all personnel who 'are performingLinspection ori d who have previously performed inspections.'- These records shal1~ be j retained for. the same period of time'as" required for the' inspection ' i reports with which the. inspectors are associated. +
1 i
'b I
. sw-e -
l-l
- 10.75d '
N " j 7
. . .~ - _ , . . .4 -
yy h______. 1 _ ._ - - - - - -
,e , 1 1 -
, ff?.Z,EEQhEdLSLSESIT?CTNE5?N?A?:S N'?YY '
'Y " '
.Nl'l ' O q.; , , ,
,.!" * , i
< 4109 21($7P)4 42"
,s ,
..' c' ~. s ,9 {, ' py ,r '* '
'. ~
'2
..P AGE -or -f -~ ,
. HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY: S E'CTI'0H ;
. ' SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT
'ESASCO SERVICES - ' ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 :
INCORPORATED 1 QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C '
- QA-III-12
o TEST CONTROL' , s .
> da p
b) Identification of ritems to be testied. : ,' " i c) .' Identification of calibrated devices Tor equipment ;to be usedI i during testing.. - d) Provisions for checking condition 'of; test equipment' and item tof be' tested.. '
;d.
i e) Proper environmental. condit' ions under ,which test is .to be '2
- performed.
i f)u Test methods. ' g) Operations to.be performed. 1
. h)' Inclusion' of,-- or reference ' to,' acceptance criteria. - -
i) Data to be recorded. - j) Requirements for qualified and/or.'. certified. personnel.- 2.3 i Test reports shall be reviewed and signed-off:by Ebasco Quality o Control in accortlance with written: procedure requirements to assure- tha't; test requirements have been satisfied.
- )
.1 2.4 Audits shall be performed in accordance with.'Section QA-III-9 'of this Manual to assure conformance, to. the. requirements of this Section. ;llR20 :
3.0 RECORDS , y l ' All records pertaining to this Section skiall be maintained in:accordance'with ' I Section QA-I-6 of this Manual. . i
'i
! i.
1
.{
j 1 1
. i I
'- 1075d j .
i
'( 3., ,, ., n . , i, d ** - '
e
"-['
- L '
. . i_n a .. ._:m.__.. ,vs
,;u was.a:.1:GD S:% -A. ".-'3 W =i M " ' "n"# [ , sie..ause m is- '
occe 1 or~2' HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY ' SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBA5CO SERVICE 5 ELECTRIC GENERATING $TATION UNIT 51 & 2 mconeoaATeo QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 0ESCRIPil0N - PART C QA-III-12 TEST CONTROL 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This Section describes the system employed at the construction site which assures that tests required to demonstrate that items will perform satisfactorily in service are identified and documented. The requirements of this Section apply to all phases of the testing program at the construction site, including, but not limited to: func tional-testing, proof testing, acceptance testing, and operational testing. s 1.2 These tests shall be performed in accordance with written test procedures which include or reference the requirements and acceptance
. limits contained,in applicable design-documents. - -
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Site Quality Control procedures shall provide for the following: a) Assuring that all prerequisites for the given test have been met. b) Use of trained personnel to witness tests. - c) Identification of test equipment and the item to be tested. d) Checking the condition of test equipment and the item to be tested. e) Use of devices of this Manualcalibrated in accordance for the performance with Section QA-III-13 of tests. f) Verification that tests are performed under proper environmental conditions; eg, cleanliness. g) Documentation of test results. h ,' Acceptance criteria for test requirements. 2.2 Site Quality Assurance, and/or the Client or his designee, shall lR20 review and comment on the written procedures for tests covered by this Section. All comments sha13 be resolved prior to implementation of the procedures. These test procedures shall be reviewed in accordance with Site Quality Assurance procedures and/or instructions for the inclusion of: a) Provisions for assuring' that all test prerequisites have been met. 1075d
. .mam.c.h:w. . , , w w .;u/ 4 s a ce 4 : R LZ ; ' -
' MAN ' C- N y e sos.astsroe.as
' pace 1 or ~2 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXA$ PROJECT -
EBA5CO HMCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 mconeonarro QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-III-13 CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TESTING EQUIPMENT 1.0 SCOPE - 1.1 This Section describes the interface activities between the Client and Ebasco for the purpose of providing Measuring and Test. Equipment (M&TE) and calibration services. This Section also describes the. requirements of Ebasco's M&TE control for the equipment used at the - construction site when performing tests and inspections of safety-related-items. 1.2 Ebasco's activities described herein shall be performed in accordance with written instructions, procedures, and/or drawings that have 1een developed and accepted in .accordance_with the. requirements of - Section QA-III-1 of this Manual. 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 The Client shall be responsible for the issuance and subsequent calibration of all measuring and testing devices. 2.2 The Ebasco Quality Control Site Supervisor or his-designee shall be responsible to assure compliance with site implementing procedures for the control of user M&TE apparatus used by the Site Quality Control. 2.3 The Ebasco Site Manager or his designee shall be responsible to assure compliance with site implementing procedures for the control of - user M&TE apparatus used by Ebasco Construction. 2.4 The users shall assure that the measuring and testing devices used are marked with the proper identification number and identified to their calibration due date, and are of the preper range, type, and accuracy to verify conformance to established requirements. 3.0 GENERAL 3.1 Measuring and Test Equipment issued from the Client to Ebasco shall be controlled in accordance with approved site procedures. 3.2 Methods shall be employed to assure proper handling, storage, and care of the M&TE in order to maintain its required accuracy. i
)
1 1075d I i r <
x .: i.s a a .G % % v l G K G a L ' M __W-' ' " 5 -' ~ " + _.__.m.-- .
~&~~" ' " " ,'~"_~ ~y"mm,
"' ~ "* ,g P
. sics.ruste n.ea poos =2 or 2 HOU$ TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPAtJY '
SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EB ASCO SEmCES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 meoRPoRATEo QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C Q8-111-1) CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TESTING EQUIPMDIT 3.3 Any M&TE found to be out-of-calibratica'shall be returned to the Client. When M&TE is found to be out-of-calibration,. damaged, t iost, or stolen, an evaluation shall be made to ascertain the validity of previous inspection or test results and the acceptability of suspect items, the original required inspections and/or testa shall be repeated using properly calibrated equipment. Suspect items'on which a questionable device was used shall be listed on the. Nonconformance Report (NCR) or Deficiency Notice (DN), as applicable.
' 3.4 Inspectf on and test reports shall include identification of M&TE
, used to perform the inspections and/or tests. 3.5 Audits shall be performed in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of lR20 this Manual to the extent necessary to assure compliance with the requirements of the Client's measuring- and test equipment calibration program and the requirements of this Section. 4.0 _ RECORDS Records pertaining to this Section shall be maintained in accordance with Section QA-I-6 of this Manual. N 1075d 4
*'.w % a _ _ ,, ,
- ,r m, y g t-
.. %SIisd. ~
s h "hN A'O k N '-k
/
Y * *
' ~
4
/ s )s ) g r
;h f.1. ' -
3 ' ]' ' ' . l g 11 ,p, d A
' s h,eg g heje$ k' s sace 1- e ,. 5 ,,
HOUSTON LtdhT,1 G AND POWER COMPANY k Stb: :.XA5 PROJECT - 's h SECTION *
/
EBASCO SERVI [E5 ELECTRIC GENT.R, 'NG STATION UNIT 51 & 2 *p(/ 3
,e meoneentro QUAUTy ASSURANCE PRUA, TAM DESCRIPTION - PART C ![
(- QA,III-14 v/ CONTROL OF RECZIVING, < (. RAEpLING, AND STORAGE 2.
~'
n t g fa N 2.0 SCOPE I, 17 )r
.d 1..I [Thih%ction describes the methods' employed during receiving, bdnting, pJora2e,, and installation to assure that all safety-related items receisd by Ebasco at the constfactica site will be usable when 5 ,' needed. .These requirements a;ynly'to bo Q items received by Ebasco / S m.
~
tequire temporary storage before assem[bly urThey inatt03also tion.the Clien apply to both on-site and off-site facilities khichbre used for the \ storage of items under control of the construction forr:es. p s 1.24 The activities described herein shall-be performed'in accordance with written instructions, procedures, abd/or drawings that have been developed and accepted in accordance'with the requirements of Section-QA-III-1 of this Mannal. ' 1.3 The storage of safety-related items mair.tained in facilities under [l(\lI.. the direct concrol of the Client or his designee is excluded from the scope of this Manual. t '., 1.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.34 The Ebasco Construction organization shall be esponsible for the following:, , s a) Perform scs:e of receiving, handling, storam, maintenance, and ciertaing activities in.accordance with specifications provided by tx C1fe.nt or his deAignee and/or code requirements.
' .l .
, h!
b) Development of bethods for dpecis landling (off-loading) in accordance with manufacturer's roiemmendations and/or specifications provided by the, Client or his designee. c) Establishing storage areas to meet levels as briefly described below:
- 1) Level A - Indoor, controlled environment.
l
- 2) Level B - Indoor, heated and ventilation controlled. . ;
- 3) level C - Indoor or equivalent, ventilation controlled. I
- 4) Level D - Outdoor.
l 1075d '
.1 < : x.: a u w . . % .: .u:w w. a & wwJ a & "" ~~ * " -" ' ~ ~ ~ "
l
.. 5 :09 2115TP)4.e5 pagg 2 . op $
HOU$ TON UCHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBASCO SERWCE5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 meoanomateo QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-III-14 CONTROL OF RECEIVING, HANDLING, AND STOTJLGE d) Development of general storage plans which list types of items and their intended storage locations and levels. Such plans shall be prepared prior to receipt of items from the Client or his designee. 2.2 Ebasco Site Quality Control shall be responsible for the following: a) Qualification of personnel performing inspection functions applicable to receiving, handling, and storage. b) Assigning qualified quality control personnel for performance of inspection and/or surveillance of receiving, handling, storage, maintenance, and cleaning activities. c) Performing and documenting inspection and/or surveillance activities in accordance with approved checklists to verify that receiving, handling, storage, maintenance, and cleaning activities, as described in Paragraph 2.1 of this Section, are performed in accordance with project requirements, d) Establishing and implementing methods for rejection of nonconforming items which provide adequate means of identifying the item as nonconforming and physically segregating the item where practical. When segregation is not I ractical, a status type indicator shall be used. Application and removal of status type indicators shall be by quality control personnel only. . 2.3 Audits shall be performed in accordance with Section QA-III-9 of lR20 ; this Manual to assure conicrmance to the requirements of this Section. 2.4 The Client or his designee is responsible for procurement and initial receiving inspection of all safety-related items. However. if requested in writing by the Client or his designee to perform initial receiving inspection of safety-related items upon their arrival at the job site, Ebasco will conduct a complete program that covers the full parameters of this Section. Otherwise, Ebasco shall conduct a receiving inspection program as is applicable and in accordance with approved site procedures. l 1075d __ ______________.i---_-----
m1.MMLXK2%WiHGKb7l15?dhXMiM,2911 X@%:!5MMGi;LC A RC.%W Da.G;p
; . s.
W WlQ
,4 h ,.
g ,
' . j;, . . , ,
3
., : site-mstrus = cy 9 4.s - - ' ' M '
- ace i3! , or S3 h HOUSTON LIGHTING AhD POWER COMPANYf.
s , SECTloN !
<$0UTH TEXAS PROJECT ,
=.. EB ASCO SERylCE5" ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 31 & 2 '
mconcomatso QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C QA-III-147 CONTROL OF RECEIVING, ' 4 , t
. , HANDLING, AND STORAGE '
j ' .1 7 1 3.04 RECEIVING INSPEUTION 3.'1 Safety-related items utilized for' fabrication, Lorection,cinstalla- - ution,. or modification shall be subjected to receiving inspection to ' assure-
. conformance to = the ' requirements. of the . applicable drawings,ispecifica-o
, tions,: and- other documents as required. Where source' inspection 11s,not:
performed, receiving inspection at site; for acceptability; will be .'
. performed. -
3.2 Inspection Requirements . e 4 JReceiving. inspection procedures 'shall ben preparadrby khe Quality ; Control Site Supervisor or his designee-in accordance with the requirements of. this Manual. These procedures l shall' provide instructions and checklists for performing recaiving: inspection:and- ' shall include at least the following activities:2 f
~
a) Documentation-review to assure that the' documentation package: has been received and that a signed " Release for Shipment' form . 4 accompanies the items received,' when applicable.!. ' b) Visual examination. - g c) Marking and' tagging for. traceability. . . 1 d) Testing when specified. e) Preparation for storage. 4.0 HANDLING 4.1 Handling practices applied to safety-related items shall assure-minimum possibility for damage or loss of environmental protection.- 4.2 Inspection Requirements, Site Quality Control procedures .shall- provide for' at leastL the' following: ' a) Review of handling requirements. for safety-related items.
+
b) Performance 'of appropriate inspections to assure that handling .. operations have not jeopardized . item integrityn
),
1075d , ; , (,i [ 4 . , 4.,+ x ; f.S dw e <* AW M *** '- > 1 f
~
.[ q (
'. z,R RKr:1.%:i1% % K:: K 52t r it. D L2 D % 7: 2:...G L .T. JT '" 7%,: L:.K2h.;i.;
] s
. ses.atisTow es
-pA*t ~4 er 3' HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTioH SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT !
EBASCO SENCES : L ECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 51 & 2 qualm ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C-mcommonarco QA-III-14 . ' CONTROL OF RECEIVING, HANDLING, AND STORAGE f 1 (
- 5. 0 STORAGE AND IN-PIACE PROTECTION 5.1 All safety-related items shall be stored in locations and storage-levels as outlined below except for those items released from storage and placed in their permanent or sta'ged locations which shall be cared for, maintained, and inspected in accordance with design specifications and the applicable approved procedures. In place protection in permanent i
' location is permitted for large items such as equipment, provided that the permanent location is ready for the' item installation. If the '{ permanent location or the area in which the item is staged does not afford the required level of protection, additional protection shall be provided to prevent degradation of the item. For in place protection purposes, a permanent location shall be considered to be within the room i and/or immediate vicinity in which the item is to be permanently installed. 5.2 Inspection Requirements Site Quality Control procedures shall provide for at least the following: a) Monitoring of the storage levels listed below:
, 1) Level A'- Indoor, controlled environment. j
- 2) Level B - Indoor, haated and ventilation co'n trolled.
- 3) Level C - Indoor or equivalent, ventilation controlled.
- 4) Level D - Outdoor.
b) Monitoring maintenance of storage areas to control such items as the following:
- 1) Physical condition of storage area.
?) Accus to storage area.
l
- 3) Fire protection.
l
- 4) Prohibited materials.
+
t i 1075d
-_ _ _ a
,2 + 2r;yg. ,
&.A L C L. &., & W.-lT%GA M u% M.; EN M P. 5 5,WSI$'#N??
s , y; ' 2,3 > 4 j '
,, q s etshNsTrues ' ' N :i - + . @ e <
k <4 s> * ~ ',f
, ; l plo[Nd,65' '
'l p ' E MOU$ TON Ll0HTiNG AND POWER CCMPANY '
- stCTION<M'
$0UTH TEXA5 PROJECT t .. ..
>4
= EB ASCO $ERVICES - ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 51 & 2 - ! H- t E . ?!
y mconcomAvso QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION ' PART;C!
! QA i 1II-14' .
.'CONTROLLOFREGIVINGE, l liANDLING,! AND STORAGE /
+
s t, _ , !
- .F '
%. [ .i c).iInspection:of~ stored?itensiand< items protected in-place lto; assure their integrity. '
1-d) Verification' of. general' storage plans khich list types ;ofl items i 1and' their.. intended storage locations,and levels.-( , ' x f.
. J \ .
e)' . Monitoring"of: storage! areast to maintain; proper; segregation of. l asterials. Itessisha11~ retain an appropriate identification for? .o re trievability. and . Inventoryj control' .(as . . applica ble , to . the ' E J nature and use of the material. . 4 4 s q g f) -Monitoring; of, provisionsifort preservation 2ofJitems,Cas ' required U
' by apecial. conditions.'
.i , ;G
- g) Verification that the withdrawal of. any component,: assembly -
system,. or materials' from the Client.'s 'or his designee'si , warehouse or storage . area' s shall' be' by t6 he Requisition' fori Stored Items' completed byithel responsible' supervisor or his ' designated representative. S The request sha11Lidentify the; .
' material'and applicable references to a' drawing or ' specification. '
,, cc
-i-'
5.3 The Client or his designee shall'be responsibleLfor:the . . . . establishment of storage levels,' 1 maintenance, and:anyf other applicable y handling and storage requirements. The'Ebasco Construction. organization-is responsible for developing and implementing; procedures;sddressingi h these requirements.
.. 6.0 ' RECORDS i;' q' Records pertaining to this Section;shall be maintained in~ accordance withi C{
Section QA-I-6 of this Manual. {
;\
9
?
' c J ,
p
. , s 1~ ,
4
.Ti ;
a
, ]'f[
, Sf
- q ,
't
' Y_ g '
3
-1075d #'.
' 7s -!
' s q , <' 7 3 v(
(; Np$h +- 4 3 . .,
.,gi + #
..1,'
- t
- A w . - -. _ _ _ 2. < - -
, 3
] ki 4 I < '. ]
X n ,; .;a , 2 72 ^ 3 ,4.W G, ,A LG2G aG % MLE L: ;if31.ZGa ^ = T!L T ~ , i.. JAM 4 41094tfSTF1448 ' . - P;fE 1 oF
-2 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXA3 PROJECT EBAsco $ENES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 .
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C BNCORPoMATED QA-III-15 INSPECTION, TEST, AND OPERATING STAn1S 1.0 SCOPE 1.1 This Section establishes requirements for identifying and: documenting the status of inspections and testa performed on safety-related items at the construction site and the status of the readiness of these items for turnover to the Client or his designee. The C11ent 'or his designee is responsible for precperational testing. 1.2 The activities described herein shall be performed in accordance with written instructions, procedures, and/or drawings that have been developed and accepted in accordance with the requirements of Section p QA-III-1. of this Manual. . Procedures and. instructions- shall include identification and authority of the individuals or groups responsible for application and removal of status indicators. ; 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 1 2.1 Site Quality Control shall be responsible for the following: 2.1.1 Develop and implement a system for maintaining the status of safety-related items through the use of status indicators such as { I physical location and tags', markings, work travelert, stamps, or inspection rer..ords. This system shall provide for the identifica-tion and maintenance of the status of inspections and tests ! performed on these items throughout fabrication, installation, and. erection. This system shall provide methods which assure that only ; items that have passed the required inspections and tests are .used or installed. Where physical tagging is either impractical or insufficient, procedural control or other appropriate means for maintaining item status shall be employed. 2.1.2 Control and maintain a log of the issuance and removal of status indicators such as tags. 2.1.3 Develop and implenent plans for the witnessing and documenting the results of inspections and tests. 2.1. 4 Provide methods for assuring that all required inspections and tests are performed (checklists, travelers, etc). 2.2 construction shall be responsible for the following: 2.2.1 Develop and implement a system for marking and tagging to e indicate those safety-related items which are in test, so as 'to prevent inadvertent operation. 4 1075d 9
ig; p g ,32'M: J:GbhQQ-f,WTHLD Mo*AM D5DA5 AIM ?,NMOfM t M W5W* 5S m. a > >
= s y- r s '.- [ :'
7- s
'4
.: :D sios.a usTpu.es- ' ' -
1~< l' % * [i
- 4' e ' *-i ! - *
.i -
' piog [2 ' L g e :- 2 ~
. HOU5 TON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY:
SECTION I s EBASCO SERVICES . .
. SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT' .
G ON M5101. JJT c wcomponATao QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION .PART C; , QA-III E15;1 > INSPECTION,' TEST, AND OPERATING STATUS l , M [l , 1 ..
~
2.2.2 l Develop and' implement' aisysten for : maintaining ' the status Lof . all-. systems turned.over to the Client or his designee for 4
, preoperational testing.':
3.0 GENERAL 3.1 Quality . control- procedures s mil' require ' that(inspection and' test.) , status be maintained by. the use ofl status: indicators such as.tagsi.
' markings, travelers,1 stamps,- inspection records, work sequence plans,'l or '
other appropriate means. ,
' q'
. 3.2.EThe : progre sa' of fabrication,; installation,; erection, reinspection, and ; '
test shall be entered- on appropriate' documents.' Provisions shall'be made for updating these ~ documents. to' reflect l current:. conditions.L ' 3.3 Nonconforming aafety-related ' items shall; be hiearly[ identified ~and < mark'ed a~nd shall. be processed in accordance' with Section J QA-III-6 'of. this .- ' Manual. ' 3.4 Records of tests and. inspection results shall be prepared and '
-maintained in an orderly and systematic manner.' '
3.5 Audits shall be performed 'in' accordance with Section' QA-III-9Eoff . lR20l this Manual to assure conformance to the' requirements of:1this Section. 'l' d. 4.0 RECORDS ' .j 1i
' Records pertaining to this Section shall'be maintained in .accordance .with' Section QA-I-6 of this Manual.
1 1 i 1
']
. . J
]
J id 1 l\
;l
^
, , , , W>',, }
i e 3 _. . 4 1 I i, , , , . ,4 1-1075d : 1
-, + o, m ,
- gs, 4 i f g , ].e l J I I 8 1
g 1 $' ) , g ,
..:.u.1TL KJCh =.:.*M . C .; ~;.~G D & K i> L T X M C " D 1 : 4 5 & D O s %:.wi6 s Aosastaus p a o c _1_ . er 3 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTioN SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBA5CO SEWCE5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 51 & 2 m coneom Avao QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C - Appendix I TERMS AND DEFINITIONS This Appendix contains certain tems and their definitiose used in this Manual that are importani: to the uniform understanding of the Manual and its application. Where a term is used to convey a different intent than that related herein, clarification must be'provided at the point of application: ACTIVITIES AFFECTING QUALITY (Quality-r' elated activities) - Activities affecting the quality of safety-related items, including fabricating, lR20 handling, shipping, storing, cleaning, erecting, installing, inspecting, and testing. AUDIT - A planned and documented activity performed in accordance with written procedures' or checklists to verify, by examination and evaluation of objective ! evidence, that applicable elements of a quality assurance program have bam ! developed, documented, and effectively implemented in accordance with t applicable regulatory documents, guidelines, or requirements. An audit 6es I not include surveillance or inspection for the purpose of process control or product acceptance. AUDITS (INTERNAL) - Audits performed by Ebasco personnel on those Ebasco i organizations that are governed by the Ebasco Quality Assurance Programs. IR20 CLIENT OR HIS DESIGNEE " Client" is defined as Houston Lighting and Power Company and "his designee" as Bechtel Energy Corporation.
'i CONSTRUCTION OPERATION - Activities related to construction of a. nuclear power station. -
{
)
i EBASCO HOME OFFICE - Office where project support and related functions are
. performed at Ebasco, New York. 4 INSPECTION - A phase of quality control which by means of examination, observation, or measurement 6 termines the conformance of items or services to predetermined quality requirements.
INSTRUCTIONS - Written descriptions of activities to be performed, including job specifications, work instructions, shop construction drawings, job tickets, planning sheets, operating or procedure manuals, test procedures, or other written forms, to assure that the activity is adequately described. ITEM - Any level of unit assembly, including structure, system, subsystem, component, part , or material. 4 1075d ! l 1
.,u.2 l. A t a t n.Zl3 5 H L.2Z,T y.:J 5. y 2 jyiEL B & B H M iZ*L L M i: M fM UX2.7,i:.J M
,, . . , - . ., , a o . s tos.stistrus paos 2 or 3 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY S ECTION - SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT . ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNIT 51 & 2 EBASCO SERYlCES ft INCORPORATED QURITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C . Appendix'I TERMS AND DEFINITIONS 1 i-1' NONCONFORMANCE - A deficiency in characteristic, documentation, or procedure which renders the. quality of an item or service unacceptable. Items
. - discovered to.be out-of-tolerance of specification at routine checkpoints;of an inspection process shall not be considered as a nonconformance, provided . .
, a) The conditions are corrected prior to acceptance of the work.
b) The work does not proceed beyond the checkpoint until the correction-is made.
, c) The condition does.not affect work previously_ accepted.
d) No violation of procedure or Code is evident. j QUALITY ASSURANCE (QA) RECORDS - are those records which furnish documentary l evidence of the quality of items and of activities affecting quality. A i document is considered a quality assurance record when the document has been:
,l completed. QA records may be either the original or.a reproduced copy.
i QA RECORDS (LIFETIME) - are those records which meet one or more of the following criteria a) Those which would be a significant value in demonstrating capability
- j. for proper functioning of safety-related items.
i i b) Those which would be of significant value in maintaining,. reworking, repairing, replacing, or modifying the item. c) Those which would be of significant value in determining the cause-of an accident or malfunction of an item. d) Those which provide required baseline data for in-service' inspection. QA RECORDS (NONPERMANENT) - are those records which meet all of the following - criteria: a) Those of no significant value in demonstrating capability for safe operation. b) Those of no significant value in maintaining,; reworking, repairirg, replacing, or modifying the item. 0 E 1075d' _,L-__.-1----..-_l - _ - _ . _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ . - .- 1-.A.-__ k _ -?__.'.._.- . - _ - _ . _ - - - - -
- . m .# . u.A..: TLEG.o , 3 ncA...;. .h_.. . ~ 7d477!:R ' ti..aa:MHi:ZM3.iC.E.XdlL?T .j , - a , , . ,
610941(STP)445 'pAgg op HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 EBA$co SENCES INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C Appendix I-TERMS AND DEFINITIONS. c) Those of no significant value in determining the cause of malfunction of an item. d) Those which do not provide baseline data for in-service inspe'etion. I ,
! QUALITY TREND - A consistent reporting of'conformance or nonconformance with applicable criteria attributed to a specific organizational unit.
SAFETY-RELATED ITEM - Any item designated by the Client or his designee to ' lR20 be Safety class 1, 2, 3, Seismic Category I, or electrical Class IE and any
- other items as designated and indicated as safety-related in the SAR.' lR20 i ; SHtVICE - Performance of nuclear safety-related activities such as ! fabrication, inspection, nondestructive examination, installation, and test..
SPECIAL PROCESS '- A special process is a fabrication, testing, or inspection operation whose correct performance is governed by parameters established l during qualification testing for the operation, eg,. welding and nondestructive q testing. i
! r I
i i ll 1 t
~i 1075d . _ .
I _-
E , d, r i 1 site.aitsm44s paoc or 6 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION
$00TH TEXA5 t>ROJECT 4 EBASCO SERVICE 5 ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 .. .
QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAF DESCRIPTION - PART C- Appendix II INCORPORATED EBASCO EXCEPTIONS TO US NUCLEAR , REGUIATORY GUIDES AND ANSI . STANDARDS l
. INDICATED IN SECTION .QA-I-1 I a
EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.5-1974: ) l :.
- 1. ANSI N45.2.5-1974, Section 4.8, states " Pumped concrete'must be sampled from the pump line discharge." In lieu of this statement, in' process- 3 strength samples of' pumped concrete are taken at: the delivery point. !
Correlation tests of air content, slump, and temperature .are ' performed to-l verify these plastic properties of the concrete at the placement point-in { , accordance with the following frequency requirements: i L A. A minimum of two correlation tests are performed 'for each pumped placement exceeding 200 cu. yds. B. Otherwise, a minimum of two correlation tests per week' are performed . when any individual pumped placement during a week requires delivery 3 of more than one truckload of concrete.
.j C. During a week when a pumped placement exceeding 200 cu. yds. is' made',
the correlation tests performed on that placement will satisfy! the.
] '
weekly requirement for performing two correlation tests as specified in Item B above. If the correlation test result shows a concrete property not meeting the l i specification limite and/or tolerances at thel point of placement, the frequency of correlation testing shall be increased to 100 cubic yards. If two consecutive correlation tests exceed the'specified limit for slump, air content, or temperature, the. Constructor shall document the condition, notify Bechtel Site Engineering within 24 hours of completion . of the placement and shall return to control of the concrete by . in process testing at the point of placement per ANSI N45.2.5-1974 l
" Correlation Testing," " Delivery Point," and " Placement Point" are as i deflued in ANSI N45.2.5-1978, Section.1.4.
2. Samples and frequency for cadweld testing is in accordance with ACI-359-ASME Section III, Division 2, issued for trial use and comment in 1973, including Addenda 1 through 6 (see Sections 3.8.1.6.3 and 3.8.3.6.3 of. the South Texas Project Fins 1 Safety Analysis Report). i 1
~
l i
'1075d ,
. mm
.s . ,
i . ,y . , , . ..m e ina psism.o 2 nog ,, . 6 , , HOUSTON UGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBA5CO SERVICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 mcompon Arro - QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C EBASCO EXCEPTIONS TO US NUCLEAR Appendix II REGULATORY GUIDES AND ANSI STANDARDS ' INDICATED IN SECTION QA-J ' j
.{
J EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.1-1973:
- 3. Section 2.1,. Planning. . The required planning is frequently performed on a generic basis for application to many installations 'on one or more. a projects. This results in standard procedures or plans for installation and inspection and testing which meet the requirements of the standard.. ]
1 Individual plans for each item or system are not normally' prepared ~unless; ! the work operations are unique. However, standard procedures or plans . l will be reviewed for applicability in each case. Installation: plans or. 1 procedures are also limited in scope to those actions or activitle's which e ,- u.- ,m_,
- > are , essential.to maintain =or achieve required; quality.u This is {
consistent with Section 2, Paragraphs 2 and 3, of ANSI N45.2-1971 which i provides for examination, measurement, or testing to assure quality or. indirect control by monitoring of processing methods. However, final . cleaning or flushing activities will be performed in accordance with .
)
procedures specific to the system.
- 4. Section 4, Pre-Installation Cleanness. This.section states,'" Items should not be delivered to the point of installation site sooner than necessary unless the installation location is considered a bet.ter storage ;j area." As an alternate to this requirement items may be' delivered to the J
' installation site sooner then absolutely necessary when determined to be advantageous for other considerations, for example, reduced handling or -
easier access, thereby reducing susceptibility to handling damage. In all such cases, equipment stored in place will be' protected in accordance j with Section.5 of ANSI N45.2.1-1973. '
- 5. Section 3.1.2, cleanness Classifications - Class B. Ebasco interprets -
the lighting level of 100 footcandles to be guidance. .It'is'Ebasco's' normal practice that the lighting level for determining " metal clean" of accessible surfaces of piping and components is determined by the inspector. Typically he uses a standard two-cell flashlight supplemented :j by other lighting as he deems necesscry. EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.2-1972:
- 6. Section 2.7, Classification of Items. The four-level classification-system may not be used explicitly. However, the. specific requirements for each classification as specified in the standard will be. applied to ;
.the items suggested in each classification and for sin.ilar items..
Classification differing from Section 2.7 will .be. considered acceptable . . provided no degradation is assured; for example, electric motors' designed ' for outside service may be stored in Level C area rather than a Level B.
'i 1075d # :
. i L___.__ L_ ] - _ . - . _ _ _
0
. . a . .w Li : I L ~. ,, .- .
- w. .
. /.v l, za> .w' t
a e soseustmaco 3
,,cc o, 6 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECHON SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EB ASCO $ERYlcES CN GENERAMG UADON UNm 1 & 2
* "" "*
- QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C EBASCO EXCEPTIONS TO US NUCLEAR Appendix II i REGULATORY GUIDES AND ANSI STANDARDS INDICATED IN SECTION QA-I-1 l
- 7. !
Section 6.2, Storage Areas. Paragraph 6.2.1 requires control and limited 1 access to storage areas. In lieu of and to amplify this paragraph, the following t C1 be applied: i l
" Access to storage areas for Leve'is A, B, and C will be controlled by j the individual (s) responsible for storage. While the above areas will be !
posted to litit access, other positive controls (other than that for the i overall site area) or guards may not be provided. Level D areas will be. posted with the storage level designation only."
- 8. Section 5.5, Correction of Nonconformances. Thie section provides for
" rework" and "use-as-ts' dispositions for nonconforming items. As an l
alternate, the " repair" disposition (as defined in ANSI' N45.2.10-1973) will also be used. 9. Section 6.2.4, Storage of Food and Associated Items. Controlled areas, within storage areas, will be established for the storage of. food, drink, and salt tablets. These areas will be controlled through normal supervision and inspection.
- 10. In Section 8, the control of documentation and records shall be in accordance with Section QA-I-6 of the Ebasco Nuclear Quality Assurance Program Manual for the South Texas Project.
- 11. Appendix A3.4.2, Inert Gas Blankets. There may be cases involving large or compler shapes for which an' inert or ' dry air purge flow is provided rather than a static gas blanket in' order to provide adequate protection due to difficulty of providing a leakproof barrier. In these cases a positive pressure purge flow may be utilized as'an alternative to the leakproof barrier.
EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.3-1973: 12. Section 2.1, Planning. The required planning is frequehtly performed on a generic basis for application to many installations on one or more projects. This results in standard procedures or plans for installation and inspection and testing which meet the requirements of the standard. Individual plans for each item or system are not normally prepared unless the work operations are unique. However, standard procedures or plans will be reviewed for applicability in each case. Installation plans or procedures are also limited in scope to those actions or activities which are essential to maintain or achieve required quality. 1075d
. . . 'l' , Y ci , a . . , J. n J.,. u . i: "M 1. n a:D, .m l w.nax J: G ikal%GW sios4ustamas naar 4 op 6 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY S E CTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT EBASCO SEWICES ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2
** ""*"^*"" QUALITY AS$URANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C EBASCO EXCEPTIONS TO US NUCLEAR Appendix II REGULATORY GUIDES AND ANSI STANDARDS INDICATED IN SECTION QA-I-1
'3.
Alternative equivalent zone designations and requirements may be utilized to cover those situations not included in the subject standard; for example, situations in which shoe covers and/or coveralls are required but material accountability is not. In addition, zones might be combined into the next more restrictive category in order to reduce total number of zones. EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.4-1972:
- 14. Section 1.2, Applicability. The standard is applied to the items and systems identified in Paragraph 1.1.1 and to additional systems depending on the nature and scope of the work to be performed and the importance of the item or service involved.
- 15. Section 2.1, Planning. The required planning is frequently performed on a generic basis for application to many installations on one or more projects. This results in standard procedures or plans for installation and inspections and testing which meet the requirements of the standard.
Individual plans for each item or system are not normally prepared unless the work operations are unique. However, standard procedures or plans will be reviewed for applicability in each case. Installation plans or procedures are also limited in scope to those actions or activities which I are essential to maintain or achieve ' required quality. EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.8-1975:
\
16. Section 1.1, Scope. The term "important items" will be int'erpreted to apply to those activities or quality attributes of an item or service that could affect a nuclear safety-related characteristic. For example, if a barrier is required for leakage control, but serves no structural function, the leaktight characteristic would be considered "important," but appearance, dimensional requirements, and structural features would not necessarily be considered important; .or if a pump casing is required for coolant boundary integrity, but the pump does not have to ' operate to provide for nuclear safety, those attributes which affect its operation would not be considered important from the standpoint of nuclear safety. Section 2.1, Planning. The required planning is frequently performed on _ a generic basis for application to many installations on one or more projects. This results in standard procedures orp 'lans for installation and inspection and testing which meet the requirements of the standard. Individual plans for each item or system are not normally prepared unless the work operations are unique. However, standard procedures or plans 1075d ___1 _ _ _ _ _ _
' %T:5 2.W. :u 'iJJi%.. : 4.l. 7.;;:. % Dj Q W.:}:.y'.. 3 L6 l5.)1~ K jui A:h QX 3 h. & hi&B' e sos.zitsrps.as Pace' 5 ., 6 HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY SECTION SOUTH TEXAS PROJECT ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2 EBASCO SERVICE 5 INCORPORATED QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C Appendix II-EBASCO EXCEPTIONS 70 US NUCLEAR REGULATORY GUIDES AND . ANSI STANDARDS INDICATED IN SECTION QA-I-1 1 i I will be reviewed for applicability in each case. Installation plans or procedures are also limited in scope to those actions or activities which; ! are essential to maintain or achieve required quality.
- 17. Section 3.3, Processes and Procedures. The terms." inst +11ation site,"'
" installation area," and " site" used in this standard sin 11 be ,
d interpreted as follows: a) " Installation site" or " site" will be interpreted. the'same as
" construction site." When applied to documents, these may be.at the-central office or work area document' control station, j l
b) Installation area - Immediate proximity of location where work is to l be performed.
- 18. Section 3.5(e), Site Conditions. This requirement will be applied only 4 if subsequent correction of adjacent nonconformances could damage.the !
item being installed. 1 Section 4.6, Care of Items. HL&P retains the authority and is the
" Responsible Organization" for temporary usage of equipment or facilities unless specific (ie, on a case-by-case. basis) or general authority is granted in writing to the Construction Manager's organization.
, EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.9-1974:
- 19. Section 1.4, Definitions. Quality Assurance Records - A document is considered complete when it has finished full processing and has been issued for use in design, procurement, construction, or manufacturing.
- 20. Section 1.4, Definitions. Authenticated Eecords - Those records which are clearly identified as a statement by the individual or organization holding responsibility. Handwritten signatures are not required if the document or printout is clearly identified as a statement by the reporting individual or' organization.
- 21. For Appendix A, an installation shall be considered .to be in an "as constructed" condition if it is installed within the tolerances established by Project Engineering indicated in the design output documents.
1075d
[IEi%i.253fMSE@l@.5MO .Ch.MU42.h: !ISC/.bliM1E.4/..Ay 4 $/2 J c- @ d [23E d 7
.s
* ' f. ,
's tos.n tsT60.as --
paog b o, 6 ,
. HOUSTON LIGHTING AND POWER COMPANY - < SECTION 500TH TEXAS PROJECT -
EBASCO SENE5 ' ELECTRIC GENERATING STATION UNITS 1 & 2
*C0""^ * - QUAUTY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - PART C-EBASCO EXCEPTIONS TO US' NUCLEAR Appendir-II REGUIATORY GUIEES AND' ANSI STANDARDS INDICATED IN SECTION QA-I-l' EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.12-1977: ~
- 22. ANSI N45.2.12-1977,, Section 4.5.1, states,' "The audited organization
!. shall provide a follow-up report stating the corrective action taken and. the date corrective action was completed."' This implies,that the audited'. organization must provide the auditing organization with written: . -; i notification detailing' what corrective action was' taken and when ithe 1 corrective action was completed. In actual practice, the audited organizat on will. provide'theLauditing
~
organization with documented corrective action. including the date when' the corrective action will be completed. The auditing organization will . evaluate the corrective action res; Mse .to determine ifl corrective action 9 verification is necessary. If verification is necessary, the corrective 1 ' action verification will be performed after the scheduled completion'date 1 and the result of the verification will be ' documented.
- 23. ANSI N45.2.12-1977, Section 1.3 states, "In no way shall the" performance a of audits by an organization diminish: the responsibility of the audited organziation or contractor for audit of'his.' designated portion of thei quality assurance program or the quality .of his productL or services." ,1 For the South Texas Project 'all quality-related activities - ;
implemented for the South Texas. Project are audited annually, atla. ] minimum, or at least once within the'11fe of the activity, whichever is ' j shorter. These ' audits are performed by either Houston Lighting ,& Power i Company (HL&P) or Bechtel Energy Corporation (BEC). 'Ebasco Services l- _-l Incorporated (ESI) activities are limited:to those audits performed in accordance 4th Section III-9 of this Manual. 'R20 -]
.q EXCEPTIONS TO ANSI N45.2.6-1973:
q
- 24. As an alternate, compliance with ANSI N45.2.6-1978 and R.G.1.58 (Rev 1, 9/80) in its entirety is acceptable.
i d
'j-0,
. .- 1075d:
, 7 ,j y e ~m.* c & q. * '
.b] _l __
'}}