ML20236T938
| ML20236T938 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Hatch  |
| Issue date: | 11/25/1987 |
| From: | Reyes L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236T936 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-366-87-26, NUDOCS 8712020178 | |
| Download: ML20236T938 (1) | |
Text
,
1 ENCLOSURE 1 NOTICE OF VIOLATION 1
Georgia Power Company Docket No. 50-366 Hatch Unit 2 License No. NPF-5 During the NRC inspection conducted on September 26 - October 26, 1987, a violation of NRC requirements was identified.
The violation was for failure to perform monthly caution tag reviews.
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Action," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1986), the violations are listed below:
I Technical Specification 6.8.1.a requires the licensee to establish, 4
implement and inaintain written procedures covering the applicable acti-vities in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, Revision 2, February 1978.
Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.33, paragraph 1, recommends procedures for equipment control (e.g., locking and tagging).
Licensee procedure 30AC-0PS-001-0S, " Control of Equipment Clearances and Tags", establishes requirements for the control and periodic review of.
equipment tags.
Section 8.13.1 of this procedure requires that Caution Tag Index/ Audit Sheets be reviewed monthly.
Contrary to the above, the licensee failed to conduct reviews of the Unit 2 Caution Tag Index/ Audit Sheets during the months of May, June and September of 1987.
This 4 a Severity Level V violation (Supplement I).
Pursuant to 10 CFR 2.201, Georgia Power Company is hereby required to submit to this Office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply including:
(1) admission or denial of the violation; (2) the reasons for the violation, if admitted; (3) the
)
corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved; (4) corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations; and (5) the date when full compliance will be achieved.
Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j
1 l
t w / >r, h s A. R 9es, Director 9
Division of Reactor Projects Dated at Atlanta, Georgia this 25th day of November 1987 a
8712O20178 B71125 DR ADOCK 050 1
. _ _.