Similar Documents at Perry |
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20211P2871999-09-0909 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Increasing Present 100% Authorized Rated Thermal Power Level of 3579 Megawatts Thermal to 3758 Megawatts Thermal ML20216E4631999-09-0909 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Change Eliminating Requirement in EPP to Sample Lake Erie Sediment in Perry & Eastlake Plant Area for Corbicula,Since Corbicula & Zebra Mussels Have Already Been Identified & Control & Treatment Plans Are Implemented ML20216E4791999-09-0909 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Allowable Values for CST Low Water Level Limits from Greater than or Equal to 59,700 Gallons to Greater than or Equal to 90,300 Gallons ML20210M7851999-08-0404 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.9.1,incorporating Addl Option Into Required Actions When Refueling Interlocks Are Inoperable ML20196A2021999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SRs Implementing 24-month Operating Cycle at Pnpp ML20204E4971999-03-15015 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Typos Found in Table 3.3.6.1-1 ML20207K1041999-03-0404 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Improving Licensing & Design Basis for Isolation of FW Penetrations ML20206Q3571999-01-0606 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Improving Licensing & Design Basis for Isolation of Feedwater Penetrations ML20155D9431998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1.1.2,applying Addl Conservatism by Modifying MCPR Safety Limit Values,As Calculated by GE ML20155D8241998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding Two Paragraphs to TS 5.2.2.e, Organization - Unit Staff ML20151V4831998-09-0909 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Stipulating That Water Leakage from Feedwater motor-operated CIVs Will Be Added Into Primary Coolant Sources Outside of Containment Program & Check Valves Do Not Need to Be Included in Hydrostatic Program ML20151V1111998-09-0303 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Permitting EDG TS Action Completion Time of Up to 14 Days for Div 1 or 2 EDG & Allowing Performance of EDG 24-hour TS SR Test in Modes 1 & 2 ML20151V6861998-09-0303 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Present Div 3 DG Fuel Oil Level Requirements to Account for Rounding Error in Calculation & Unusable Volume Due to Vortex Formation at Eductor Nozzles Located in Fuel Oil Storage Tank ML20151S9561998-08-31031 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Blind Flange in Inclined Fuel Transfer Sys (Ifts) Containment Penetration to Be Removed While Primary Containment Is Required to Be Operable ML20236T7911998-07-22022 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising MSL Leakage Requirements & Eliminating Msli Valve Leakage Control Sys ML20151P1921998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Present +/- 1% Tolerance on Safety Mode Lift Setpoint for SRVs to +/- 3% ML20236H8411998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Boron Concentration in Standby Liquid Control Sys for Pnpp Cycle 8 Fuel Design & Providing Margin for Future Cycles as Required ML20216H9361998-04-14014 April 1998 Rev 1 to Proposed TS Bases,Reflecting Changes Made Since Original Implementation of TS in Improved Format in June 1996 ML20197F7871997-12-23023 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising 3.8.1 Re AC Sources to Be Consistent W/Recommendations in GL 94-01, Removal of Accelerated Testing & Special Reporting Requirements for Edgs ML20217K6501997-10-22022 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Temp Control Valves & Associated Bypass Lines Around Emergency Closed Cooling Sys Heat Exchanger ML20217F5911997-10-0202 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Note to TS 2.1.1.2 Re MCPR SL Values & Adding Footnote to TS 5.6.5.b to Reference NRC SER That Approved MCPR SL Values for Cycle 7 ML20210T9631997-09-0808 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.2.2.e,removing Reference to NRC Policy Statement on Working Hours.Rev Allows Changes to Specific Overtime Limits & Working Hours to Be Evaluated IAW 10CFR50.59, Changes,Tests & Experiments ML20217Q4591997-08-28028 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.11,revising Pressure-Temp Limits,Per Reactor Vessel Matl Surveillance Program Requirements Contained in App H of 10CFR50.90 ML20148A6591997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Existing Exception to LCO 3.0.4 as Applies to LCO 3.6.1.9 for MSIV Leakage Control Sys ML20148A6871997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Requirement for MSIV Leakage Rate Acceptance Criteria ML20137S7761997-04-0909 April 1997 Proposed TS Requirements 3.9.1.1 & 3.9.2.2 Re Frequency on Refueling Equipment & one-rod-out Interlocks ML20134D8251997-01-31031 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 1.1 Re definitions,3.6.1.1 Re Primary Containment - operating,3.6.1.2 Re Primary Containment Air locks,3.6.1.3 Re PCIVs,3.6.5.1 Re Drywell & 5.5 Re Programs & Manuals ML20134D8751996-10-24024 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1.1.2,safety Limits Applying Conservatism by Increasing MCPR Safety Limit Values ML20117E7891996-08-27027 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Mls Leakage Requirements & Eliminating MSIV Control Sys ML20108A2581996-04-26026 April 1996 Proposed Improved Tech Specs ML20100N9501996-03-0101 March 1996 Proposed TS Pages Re Drywell Leak Rate Testing Requirements ML20100L3331996-02-27027 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Drywell Personnel Air Lock Shield Door Analyses ML20100J5971996-02-24024 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Definition of Core Alteration ML20149K2221996-02-17017 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Mod of Leakage Rate Requirements for Main Steam Lines Until End of Operating Cycle 6 ML20096D4651996-01-16016 January 1996 Proposed TS Requirements for Drywell Leak Rate Testing ML20096C0591996-01-10010 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting one-time Surveillance Interval Extension to Support Current Schedule for Refueling Outage 5,scheduled to Begin 960127 ML20095H4721995-12-20020 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement of Selected Analog Leak Detection Sys Instruments W/Ge Numac Leak Detection Monitor ML20094E6751995-11-0202 November 1995 Proposed Tech Spec,Requesting Rev to TS for Onsite Power Distribution Sys:Ts 3/4.8.3.1, Distribution - Operation ML20094F2051995-11-0202 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs for Handling Irradiated Fuel in Containment or Fuel Handling Bldg & Performing Core Alterations ML20091R1911995-08-29029 August 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Incorporating New Instrumentation Trip Setpoints & Allowable Values ML20086C7281995-06-30030 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Test Interval Extension Request ML20084U0781995-06-0909 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Reflecting one-time Extension of Performance Intervals of Certain SRs ML20084Q5351995-06-0101 June 1995 Proposed Tech Specs for Implementation of Control Rod Drive Scram Time Testing Consistent W/Requirements in Pnnp Improved TS LAR ML20083Q1991995-05-18018 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs for Conversion to TS Based on NUREG-1434, Improved BWR6 Ts ML20083A6841995-05-0505 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Changes to App a TSs ML20087H8911995-05-0101 May 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Incorporation of Results of Work Performed by BWROG ML20087H9411995-04-28028 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Removal of License Conditions for Tdi EDGs Specified by Paragraph 2.c & in Attachment 2 to Operating License ML20087H9311995-04-28028 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Proposing Extension for One Operating Cycle of Exception to LCO 3.0.4 as Applies to TS for MSIV LCS ML20082C2681995-04-0303 April 1995 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding New Programmatic Requirements Governing Radiological Effluents & Relocating Procedural Details of RETS to ODCM or PCP ML20081K3191995-03-24024 March 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re one-time Extension of Performance Intervals for Certain TS Surveillance Requirements 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20216E4791999-09-0909 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Revising Allowable Values for CST Low Water Level Limits from Greater than or Equal to 59,700 Gallons to Greater than or Equal to 90,300 Gallons ML20216E4631999-09-0909 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Change Eliminating Requirement in EPP to Sample Lake Erie Sediment in Perry & Eastlake Plant Area for Corbicula,Since Corbicula & Zebra Mussels Have Already Been Identified & Control & Treatment Plans Are Implemented ML20211P2871999-09-0909 September 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Pages,Increasing Present 100% Authorized Rated Thermal Power Level of 3579 Megawatts Thermal to 3758 Megawatts Thermal ML20210M7851999-08-0404 August 1999 Proposed Tech Specs 3.9.1,incorporating Addl Option Into Required Actions When Refueling Interlocks Are Inoperable ML20209B3391999-06-28028 June 1999 Simulator Four Yr Test Rept ML20196A2021999-06-17017 June 1999 Proposed Tech Specs SRs Implementing 24-month Operating Cycle at Pnpp ML20205C6351999-03-16016 March 1999 Preliminary Rev 0 to Wps 01-43-T-801, Preliminary Weld Procedure for Perry Nuclear Power Plant Feedwater Nozzle Repair ML20204E4971999-03-15015 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Typos Found in Table 3.3.6.1-1 ML20207K1041999-03-0404 March 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Improving Licensing & Design Basis for Isolation of FW Penetrations ML20206Q3571999-01-0606 January 1999 Proposed Tech Specs Improving Licensing & Design Basis for Isolation of Feedwater Penetrations ML20195H5381998-11-18018 November 1998 Rev 4 to Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program Plan ML20155D9431998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1.1.2,applying Addl Conservatism by Modifying MCPR Safety Limit Values,As Calculated by GE ML20155D8241998-10-27027 October 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Adding Two Paragraphs to TS 5.2.2.e, Organization - Unit Staff ML20196H5131998-10-0808 October 1998 Rev 4,Vol 1 to Inservice Exam Program for Perry Nuclear Power Plant ML20151V4831998-09-0909 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Stipulating That Water Leakage from Feedwater motor-operated CIVs Will Be Added Into Primary Coolant Sources Outside of Containment Program & Check Valves Do Not Need to Be Included in Hydrostatic Program ML20151V1111998-09-0303 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Permitting EDG TS Action Completion Time of Up to 14 Days for Div 1 or 2 EDG & Allowing Performance of EDG 24-hour TS SR Test in Modes 1 & 2 ML20151V6861998-09-0303 September 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Increasing Present Div 3 DG Fuel Oil Level Requirements to Account for Rounding Error in Calculation & Unusable Volume Due to Vortex Formation at Eductor Nozzles Located in Fuel Oil Storage Tank PY-CEI-NRR-2395, Rev 5 to Perry NPP Odcm. with1998-09-0202 September 1998 Rev 5 to Perry NPP Odcm. with ML20151S9561998-08-31031 August 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Allowing Blind Flange in Inclined Fuel Transfer Sys (Ifts) Containment Penetration to Be Removed While Primary Containment Is Required to Be Operable ML20236T7911998-07-22022 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs Revising MSL Leakage Requirements & Eliminating Msli Valve Leakage Control Sys ML20151P1921998-07-13013 July 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Present +/- 1% Tolerance on Safety Mode Lift Setpoint for SRVs to +/- 3% ML20236H8411998-06-30030 June 1998 Proposed Tech Specs,Increasing Boron Concentration in Standby Liquid Control Sys for Pnpp Cycle 8 Fuel Design & Providing Margin for Future Cycles as Required ML20236T8451998-06-24024 June 1998 Rev 3,Change 3 to Vol 1 of Inservice Examination Program, for Pnpp ML20216H9361998-04-14014 April 1998 Rev 1 to Proposed TS Bases,Reflecting Changes Made Since Original Implementation of TS in Improved Format in June 1996 ML20203G4781998-02-23023 February 1998 Maint Progress Review for Perry Nuclear Power Plant ML20197F7871997-12-23023 December 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising 3.8.1 Re AC Sources to Be Consistent W/Recommendations in GL 94-01, Removal of Accelerated Testing & Special Reporting Requirements for Edgs ML20217K6501997-10-22022 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Temp Control Valves & Associated Bypass Lines Around Emergency Closed Cooling Sys Heat Exchanger ML20217F5911997-10-0202 October 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Note to TS 2.1.1.2 Re MCPR SL Values & Adding Footnote to TS 5.6.5.b to Reference NRC SER That Approved MCPR SL Values for Cycle 7 ML20210T9631997-09-0808 September 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 5.2.2.e,removing Reference to NRC Policy Statement on Working Hours.Rev Allows Changes to Specific Overtime Limits & Working Hours to Be Evaluated IAW 10CFR50.59, Changes,Tests & Experiments ML20210U8701997-09-0808 September 1997 Rev 3,change 2 to Vol 1 of Inservice Exam Program, for Pnpp ML20217Q4591997-08-28028 August 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 3.4.11,revising Pressure-Temp Limits,Per Reactor Vessel Matl Surveillance Program Requirements Contained in App H of 10CFR50.90 ML20148A6871997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs Re Surveillance Requirement for MSIV Leakage Rate Acceptance Criteria ML20148A6591997-05-0202 May 1997 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Existing Exception to LCO 3.0.4 as Applies to LCO 3.6.1.9 for MSIV Leakage Control Sys ML20137S7761997-04-0909 April 1997 Proposed TS Requirements 3.9.1.1 & 3.9.2.2 Re Frequency on Refueling Equipment & one-rod-out Interlocks ML20134D8251997-01-31031 January 1997 Proposed Tech Specs 1.1 Re definitions,3.6.1.1 Re Primary Containment - operating,3.6.1.2 Re Primary Containment Air locks,3.6.1.3 Re PCIVs,3.6.5.1 Re Drywell & 5.5 Re Programs & Manuals ML20147B8271997-01-24024 January 1997 Rev 3 to Vol 1 of Inservice Exam Program ML20134D8751996-10-24024 October 1996 Proposed Tech Specs 2.1.1.2,safety Limits Applying Conservatism by Increasing MCPR Safety Limit Values ML20117E7891996-08-27027 August 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Mls Leakage Requirements & Eliminating MSIV Control Sys ML20108A2581996-04-26026 April 1996 Proposed Improved Tech Specs ML20100N9501996-03-0101 March 1996 Proposed TS Pages Re Drywell Leak Rate Testing Requirements ML20100L3331996-02-27027 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs Re Drywell Personnel Air Lock Shield Door Analyses ML20100J5971996-02-24024 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Definition of Core Alteration ML20149K2221996-02-17017 February 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Mod of Leakage Rate Requirements for Main Steam Lines Until End of Operating Cycle 6 ML20100G0161996-02-0101 February 1996 Draft Rev 0 to Pnpp NUMARC/NESP-007 Plant-Specific EAL Guidelines ML20096D4651996-01-16016 January 1996 Proposed TS Requirements for Drywell Leak Rate Testing ML20096C0591996-01-10010 January 1996 Proposed Tech Specs,Requesting one-time Surveillance Interval Extension to Support Current Schedule for Refueling Outage 5,scheduled to Begin 960127 ML20095H4721995-12-20020 December 1995 Proposed Tech Specs Re Replacement of Selected Analog Leak Detection Sys Instruments W/Ge Numac Leak Detection Monitor ML20108B2851995-11-22022 November 1995 Rev 5 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual ML20094F2051995-11-0202 November 1995 Proposed Tech Specs for Handling Irradiated Fuel in Containment or Fuel Handling Bldg & Performing Core Alterations ML20094E6751995-11-0202 November 1995 Proposed Tech Spec,Requesting Rev to TS for Onsite Power Distribution Sys:Ts 3/4.8.3.1, Distribution - Operation 1999-09-09
[Table view] |
Text
__._ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ - _ _ _ - - - _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ . - - _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - - - - _ _ - - - - _
Attachment 3 PY-CEl/NRR-2295L Page 1 of 5 PROPOSED CHANGES TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS l
l I
l l i l
l
~
9807070381 980630 PDR ADOCK 05000440 P PDR;
Attachment 3 PY-CEl/NRR-2295L SLC System Page 2 of 5 3.1.7 l
l THis CE ,
l . SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS /
SUP,VEILLANCE FREQUENCY (borax- bon'c acid)
SR 3.1.7.1 Verify available volume oftedter_J 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> l THis p nt er:te) solution is within the limits CR of Figure 3.1.7-1. g gg
(
borax -boric acid SR 3.1.7.2 Verify temperature of ::dier pent 9er2tc 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> l solution is 2 70*F.
SR 3.1.7.3 Verify temperature of pump suction piping- 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> is 2 70*F.
! SR 3.1.7.4 Verify continuity of explosive charge. 31 days SR 3.1.7.5 Verify the concentration of boron in 31 days solution is within the limits of Figure 3.1.7-1. AND l
Once within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after water or boron is added to solution AND Once within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after l solution temperature is restored to 2 70*F (continued)
PERRY - UNIT 1 3.1-21 Amendment No. 69
)
I L__.__ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _ __
Attachment 3 PY-CEl/NRR-2295L SLC System Page 3 of 5 3,1,7 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)
SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.7.6 Verify each SLC subsystem manual, power 31 days operated, and automatic valve in the flow !
path that is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, is in the correct position, or can be aligned to the correct position.
32 4 SR 3.1.7.7- erify each pump develops a flow rate In accordance 2 N lgpm at a discharge pressure with the 7Ml5 2 1220 psig. Inservice CR Testing Program SR 3.1.7.8 Verify flow through one SLC subsystem from 18 months on a pump into reactor pressure vessel. STAGGERED TEST BASIS l
SR 3.1.7.9 Verify all heat traced piping between 18 months-storage tank and pump suction is unblocked. i AND !
Once within i
24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> after l pump suction piping l
temperature is i
restored to 2 70*F PERRY - UNIT 1 3.1-22 Amendment No. 69 I
L
- Attachment 3 PY-CEl/NRR-2295L Page 4 of 5 SLC System 3.1.7 R6PQCG WITA h)EvJ FlSURE 3.1.7-j A77AcdED 3
Ib r l5 ,
, l
/ / / /
/, / / /
g / LOW I / HIGH / _o Flow g A. EVE 1.' AL A RM / LEVEL ALARfA- / OLUME gh
/l l , .I , , l / ,. . / /
'l l '
/ )
a / ARolN '
g s /
REGION VOLU APPRdVED'
_CONCENTAATIONy f '-
%_ \ 7
/ N l / /
I2- f ! !
/ / MINIMUM [ RED j CONCENT) 10N LINE -/
j -
,/
/ / ! !
/ / / /
\
/ l. / /
/
'l l 4260 4 47 50 V - NET NK YOLUME (GALL )
Figure 3.1. -1 Sodium Penta rate Solution C entration/Volu. Requirements PERRY - UNIT 1 3.1-23 Amendment No. 69
0 4 0 1
. 5
_ W O
_ K L -
NF 4 -
AR
. f -
_ TE g
( - .
1 0 -
0 V 5
_ O !'[6
?- ) i,7M v." h *f' + 0
- 50
$y V
~-i . k2-
=- '
?;~
S
_ T -
N v?c~ -
E cM M -
e?
s L<
'%r" -
- 0 E '
N 4 - 0 9
R
.- ; LI G 4 74 ~ .;m L i-
'.. E
=
UI .' ,
VR Q l' E A
.)
LM R ;
< 1
%:2@f. Mb E .'
Y; 5 M
. : [,
_ Q-U .Q
- 00 L L ? -
+ 8 O E T 4
=^; G. W .- -#
V VM N I ER O q 2
_ D L A P 8 7
N HL T 4 A GA E I
S N H D O E V
I T N - 0 0
A O + 7 OD R 4 R
P NT I
T -
P AAR N
_ E C AE T N
FMN O
C OUE -
N L C - 0
- 0 O NO OV N
+ 64 I
T I O
U G C
_ L E
. O E L
T R S
VM N I
N ERO O LAP 4 4
WLT 0 f
il5 R O AE 4 + 5 0
O L S 4 B
0
. 0 4
4
_ x nC%
a n. n%C mCO 29 io 8 mC 2 0
v i+l * - 1 0 3
3 5 s 8 5 l* 5 6 4 9 8 2 7 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 zOe 8
l'
Attachment 4 PY-CEl/NRR-2295L Page 1 of 5 PROPOSED CHANGES TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION BASES "INFORMATION ONLY" l
l t
{
l i
i 1
i
, . Attachment 4 PY-CEl/NRR-2295L SLC System Pig] 2 of 5 B 3.1.7 B 3.1 REACTIVITY CONTROL SYSTEMS
'B 3.1.7 Standby Liquid Control (SLC) System BASES BACKGROUND To meet General Design Criterion 26. the SLC System is designed to provide the capability of bringing the reactor.
at any time in a fuel cycle, from full power and minimum control rod inventory (which is at the peak of the xenon transient) to a subcritical condition with the reactor in the most reactive xenon free state without taking credit for control rod movement. In addition, the SLC System satisfies the requirements of 10 CFR 50.62 (Ref.1) on anticipated transient without scram (ATWS).
The SLC System consists of a boron solution storage tank.
two aositive displacement pumps and two explosive valves, whic1 are provided in parallel for redundancy, and associated piping and valves used to transfer borated water from the storage tank to the reactor pressure vessel (RPV).
The borated solution is discharged through~ the high pressure core spray system sparger.
APPLICABLE The SLC System is manually initiated from the control SAFETY ANALYSES room, as directed by the Plant Emergency Instructions, if the operator believes the reactor cannot be shut down, or kept shut down, with the control rods. The SLC System is used in the event that not enough control rods can be inserted to accomplish shutdown and cooldown in the normal TdlS manner. The SLC System injects borated water into the CR reactor core to compensate for all of the various reactivity effects that could occur during plant operation. To meet this objective, it is necessary to inject a que of 8l6 boron that produces a concentration of at leas ppm o natural boron in the reactor core at 68 F. To al ow for potential leakage and imperfect mixing in the reactor system, an additional amount of boron equal to 25% of the amount cited above is added (Ref. 2). The concentration )
i versus volume limits in Figure 3.1.7-1 are calculated such that the required concentration is achieved accounting for l dilution in the RPV with normal water level and including I the water volume in the residual heat removal shutdown i cooling piping and in the recirculation loop piping. This quantity of borated solution is the amount that is above the (continued) i PERRY - UNIT 1 B 3.1-39 Revision Nn. 1 u------------
. . Att:chment 4 PY-CEl/NRR-2295L Paga 3 of 5 SLC System B 3.1.7 !
BASES I ACTIONS eL1 (continued)
OPERABLE subsystem ca)able of performing the intended SLC System function and t1e low probability of a Design Basis Accident (DBA) or transient occurring concurrent with the failure of the Control Rod Drive System to shut down the l reactor. '
B.1 ;
With twa SLC subsystems inoperable. at least one subsystem must be restored to OPERABLE status within 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />. The allowed Completion Time of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> is considered acceptable, based on the low probability of a DBA or transient occurring concurrent with t1e failure of the Control Rod Drive System to shut down the reactor.
C.1 If any Required Action and associated Completion Time is not met, the plant must be brought to a MODE in which the LC0 does not ap)1y. T9 achieve this status, the plant must be brought to 10DE 3 within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br />. The allowed Completion Time of 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> is reasonable, based on operating experience, to reach MODE 3 from full power conditions in an orderly manner and without challenging plant systems.
SURVEILLANCE SR 3.1.7.1. SR 3.1.7.2. and SR 3.1.7.3 ~DllSCR REQUIREMENTS 9 SR 3.1.7.1 through SR 3.1.7.3 are 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> Surveillance. ,
verifying certain characteristics of the SLC System the volume and temperature of thefeedium cen:rcrx bem- ric "'y' solution in the storage tank, and temperature of the pum) suction piping). thereby ensuring the SLC Sy_ stem OPERABI _ITY without disturbing normal plant operation.fEc tc~ ":cciu ;)
T'WS CM '( pent:bcrate clutien" is uccc 0 describe the rc: alt: fromf These Surveillance 7 mixing ber=) roper ensure the =d beric borated acid solution in water.)
ana temperature.
including tie temperature of the pump suction piping, are maintained. Maintaining a minimum specified borated solution temperature is important in ensuring that the boron remains in solution and does not precipitate out in the ;
storage tank or in the pum) suction piping. The 24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> '
Frequency of these SRs is 3ased on operating experience that l has shown there are relatively slow variations in the I measured parameters of volume and temperature. l (continued)
PERRY - UNIT 1 B 3.1-41 Revision No. 1 L-______--_._-_-_----_--____
Attachment 4
~
- PY-CEl/NRR-2295L SLC System Pags4 of 5 B 3.1.7 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.1.7.4 and SR 3.1.7.6 REQUIREtiENTS (continued) SR 3.1.7.4 verifies the continuity of the explosive charges in the injection valves to ensure proper operation will occur if required. Other administrative controls, such as those that limit the shelf life of the explosive charges, must be followed. The 31 day Frequency is based on operating experience that has demonstrated the reliability of the explosive charge continuity.
l SR 3.1.7.6 verifies each valve in the system is in its correct position, but does not apply to the squib (i.e.,
explosive) valves. Verifying the correct alignment for manual, power o)erated, and automatic valves in the SLC System flow pati ensures that the proper flow paths will exist for system operation. A valve is also allowed to be in the nonaccident position, provided it can be aligned to the accident position from the control room, or locally by a dedicated operator at the valve controls. This is acceptable since the SLC System is a manually initiated system. This Surveillance does not apply to valves that are locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in position, since they were verified to be in the correct position prior to locking, sealing, or securing. This verification of valve alignment does not apply to valves that cannot be inadvertently misaligned, such as check valves. This SR does not require any testing or valve manipulation: rather it involves verification that those valves capable of being mispositioned are in the correct positions. The 31 day Frequency is based on engineering judgment and is consistent '
with the procedural controls governing valve operation that ensure correct valve positions.
T415 CE SR 3.1.7.5 borar-boricM. pent:bcr;tc)
This Surveillance solution byrequires an examination using chemicc1 of the :cdt; analysis to ensure Ine pr tank. y ,,,c concentration
- cim 3001am ofpcr.;
boron exists
= cr;tc in the storage
- cluticr," i; u;cd to 1 descr' bt+he rerults free '""'W
- bcrax ar.d beric acid ij THIS CR - -wat+-JSR 3.1.7.5 must be 3erformed anytime boron or water is added to the storage tanc solution to establish that the boron solution concentration is within the specified limits.
This Surveillance must be performed anytime the solution temperature is restored to a: 70 F, to ensure no significant (continued)
PERRY - UNIT 1 B 3.1-42 Revision No. 1
- Attachment 4 PY-CEl/NRR-2295L 9*
SLC System i B 3.1.7 BASES SURVEILLANCE SR 3.1.7.5 (continued)
REQUIREMENTS boron precipitation occurred. The 31 day Frequency of this Surveillance is appropriate because of the relatively slow variation of boron concentration between surveillance.
TH6 cf. SR 3.1.7.7 l 31.4 rating each SLC System pump develops a flow rate i a gpm at a discharge pressure = 1220 asig ensurbs that pump performance has not degraded during tie fuel cycle.
This minimum pum? flow rate requirement ensures that, when borax-boricacid) combined with EnmcdM cc?2cNtd solution concentration 6_s requirements, the rate of nehative reactivity insertion from the SLC System will adequately compensate for the positive THIS Cg.j reactivity effects encountered during power reduction.
cooldown of the moderator, and xenon decay. This test confirms one point on the pump design curve, and is indicative of overall performance. Such inservice inspections confirm component OPERABILITY. trend performance, and detect incipient failures by indicating abnormal performance. The Frequency of this Surveillance is in accordance with the Inservice Testing Program.
SR 3.1.7.8 and SR 3.1.7.9 1
These Surveillance ensure that there is a functioning flow path from the boron solution storage tank to the RPV, including the firing of an explosive valve. The replacement charge for the ex)losive valve shall be from the same manufactured batc1 as the one fired or from another batch that has been certified by having one of that batch successfully fired. The pump and explosive valve tested should be alternated such that both complete flow paths are tested every 36 months, at alternating 18 month intervals.
The Surveillance may be performed in separate ste)s to prevent injecting boron into the RPV. An accepta)le method for verifying flow from the pump to the RPV is to aump ,
i demineralized water from a test tank through one S_C subsystem and into the RPV. The 18 month Frequency is based ;
on the need to perform this Surveillance under the conditions that apply during a plant outage and the potential for an unplanned transient if the Surveillance was i performed with the reactor at power. Operating experience (continued)
PERRY - UNIT 1 B 3.1-43 Revision No. 1
_ _ - _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ ,