ML20236B930

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-443/87-20
ML20236B930
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/22/1987
From: Johnston W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Harrison R
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
References
NUDOCS 8710260416
Download: ML20236B930 (2)


See also: IR 05000443/1987020

Text

w

.,

.,

OCT 2 21987

USNRC-DS

M OCI 26 A 9: 49

Docket No. 50-443

Public Service of New Hampshire

ATTN: Mr. Robert J. Harrison

President and Chief Executive Officer

'

P. O. Box 330

Manchester, New Hampshire 03105

Gentlemen:

Subject:

Inspection No. 50-443/87-20

l

This refers to your letter dated September 18, 1987, in response to our letter

'

dated August 19, 1937.

Thank you for informing us of the corrective and preventive actions documented

i

in your letter. These actions will be examined during a future inspection of

l

your licensed program.

l

Your cooperation with us is appreciated.

l

Sincerely,

I

ROBERT M. GALLO

l

William V. Johnston, Acting Director

i

Division of Reactor Safety

cc:

Seabrook Hearing Service List

l

Ted. C. Feigenbaum, Vice President of Engineering and Quality Programs

William B. Derrickson, Senior Vice President

Warren J. Hall, Regulatory Services Manager

Donald E. Moody, Station Manager

Peter W. Agnes, Assistant Secretary of Public Safety, Commonwealth of

Massachusetts

'

i

Employee's Legal Project

'

l

l

Public Document Room (PDR)

!

Local Public Document Room (LPOR)

Nuclear Safety Information Center (NSIC)

i

l

NRC Resident Inspector

State of New Hampshire

/

hogg h

p

G

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL SEABROOK 87-20 - 0001.0.0

0 ol

10/20/87

5

I

li

1

l

<

l

l

!

l

Public Service of New Hampshire

2

'

1

bec:

l

Region I Docket Room (with concurrences)

!

DRP Section Chief

Robert J. Bores, DRSS

i

l

1

l

l

1

l

.

l

l

.

DRS

DRS

l

Wallace/cm

Kel

1

l

10/3//87

10

87

10)

7

4W

l

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

RL SEABROOK 87-20 - 0002.0.0

10/20/87

l

- - - - _ - _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ - - - - _ .

'

,

y

b 90$,-ThomOS

Vice Pf osident-Nucloor Ptoduchon

I

.

Put:4c SeMce of New ikingdilre

New Hampshire Yankee Division

NYN-87111-

September.18, 1987

l

l

United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Washington, DC 20555

l

Attention:

Document Control Desk

l

!

References:

(a)

Facility Operating License NPF-56, Docket No. 50-443

i

i

(b) USNRC Letter, Dated August 19, 1987, " Inspection Report

l

No. 50-443/87-20", William V. Johnston to Robert J. Harrison

!

Subject:

Response to Inspection Report No. 50-443/87-20

Centlemen:

l

In accordance with the requirements of the notice of violation identified

in Reference (b), enclosed please find our response to that violation.

Should you have any questions concerning our response, please contact

Mr. Warren J. Hall at (603) 474-9574, extension 4046.

Very truly yours,

cb

'

k

o

S. Thomas

l

Enclosure

cc:

Mr. William T. Russell,

!

Regional Administrator

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I

631 Park Avenue

,

King of Prussia, PA 19406

l

J

Mr. A. C. Cerne

NRC Senior Resident Inspector

4

5

Seabrook Station

Seabrook, NH 03874

l

a

pq_A4Ga/T3f-

, , 7 , -.

r

P.O. Box 300. Seabrook, NH 03874. Telephone (603) 474 9574

j

u____--_____

___ . - - - - _

_

__

j

.

.

y

.

.

ENCLOSURE TO NYN-87111

i

<

NHY RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF VIOLATION

!

l

Notice of Violation 87-20-01

j

l

As a result of the inspection conducted on July 20-24, 1987, and in accordance

I

with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enf orcement

i

Actions ," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (Enforcement Policy) (1986), the following

)

violation was identified:

10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIV, requires that measures be

established to indicate the operating status of systems and components.

ANSI N18.7-1976, paragraph 5.2.6, " Equipment Control", states in part,

" Procedures shall be provided for control of equipment...to avoid

unauthorized operation of equipment." Seabrook Station, Maintenance

]

Program Manual, Procedure MA4.2, Revision 5, " Equipment Tagging and

i

Isolation," paragraph 4.2.6, step 1, states "A Danger Tag Hold is used to

allow work to be performed on systems or equipment already Danger tagged

without issuing a redundant Tagging Order."

Contrary to the above, safety tagging operations were improperly

)

controlled, in that, on July 22 and 23, 1987, two instances were observed

j

where plant maintenance was conducted with applicable Tagging Orders

j

being controlled without a Danger Tag Hold as required by Seabrook

i

]

Station procedure MA 4.2.

In addition, on July 23, 1987, it was observed

that Danger Tagged valve 1-SW-V-139 had been physically removed f rom the

i

Service Water System in violation of the requirements of ANSI N18.7-1976.

Response

l

The improper implementation of procedure MA 4.2, " Equipment Tagging and

3

Isolation" as cited in Violation 87-20-01 is correct.

A subsequent evaluation

l

concluded that the Tagging Order Modifications Section of the subject

procedure required better definition and each tagging order should be a

stand-alone document.

Immediate Corrective Action

i

As a result of the above stated violation, the following corrective actions

have been taken:

1)

Tagging Order 87-1395 has been modified to change the boundary

isolation from SW-V-139 to SW-V-140 and to release the Danger Tag on

SW-V-139.

Additionally, Tagging Order 87-1754 has been modified to

include all the boundary isolations required to support the removal

and reinstallation of SW-V-20.

2) An internal audit was conducted on all active Tagging Orders to

ensure conformance to MA 4.2. The audit was completed on August 6,

1987, and concluded that the findings were limited to those stated in

the violation.

1

i

Page 1 of 2

L _________-

_ __

-

-r

)

!

.

,.

3)

Equipment tagging procedure HA 4.2 was revised to reflect the

following:

a) A step was added to Section 4.2.1, Danger Tags , which requires

each Tagging Order or Hold Order to be a stand-alone document.

b) A step was added to Section 4.2.9, Tagging Order Modifications,

which allows modifications to be made to the original Tagging _

Order if the boundary isolation is to be moved.

This revision was implemented on July 29, 1987.

4) The Shift Superintendent, Unit Shift Supervisor and Shift Test

Engineers involved with Tagging Orders 87-1395 and 87-1754 have been

counseled to ensure each Tagging Order is a stand-alone document.

Long Term Corrective Action

Training for all individuals identified.on the Switching and Tagging List has

l

been initiated to ensure that the requirements set forth in the equipment

!

tagging procedure, HA 4.2, are understood.

It is anticipated that these

individuals will complete this training by November 30, 1987.

l

l

l

!

l

i

l

!

I

l

l

\\

!

I

l

'

l

i

i

l

l

l

!

'

Page 2 of 2

l

l

!

__

. -_ _ _

a