|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARML20217M8851999-10-0808 October 1999 Informs of Staff Determination That Listed Calculations Should Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790, as Requested in 990909 Affidavit ML20211J7731999-08-31031 August 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/99-03 on 990802-06.No Violations Noted.Insp Included Decommissioning & Dismantlement Activities,Verification of Compliance with Selected TS & Review of Completed SEs ML20211H7481999-08-13013 August 1999 Forwards Amend 126 to License DPR-54 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Changes Permanently Defueled Technical Specification (PDTS) D3/4.1, Spent Fuel Pool Level, to Replace Specific Reference to SFP Level Alarm Switches with Generic Ref 3F0799-22, Provides Update & Rev to Submittal Made by Util Ltr with Regard to EAL Classification Methodology for Unit 3.Reponses to NRC Staff Questions Provided as Attachment D to Ltr & Reflects Discussions Held1999-07-13013 July 1999 Provides Update & Rev to Submittal Made by Util Ltr with Regard to EAL Classification Methodology for Unit 3.Reponses to NRC Staff Questions Provided as Attachment D to Ltr & Reflects Discussions Held ML20210H9541999-07-0707 July 1999 Informs NRC of Change to Rancho Seco Decommissioning Schedule,As Described in Licensee Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20209D2501999-06-24024 June 1999 Informs That Util Has Revised All Sections of Rancho Seco Emergency Plan (Rsep),Change 4,effective 990624 ML20196G0431999-06-22022 June 1999 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Smud Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20195D1851999-05-27027 May 1999 Forwards Rancho Seco Annual Rept, IAW Plant Permanently Defueled TS D6.9.4 & D6.9.6b.Rept Contains Shutdown Statistics,Narrative Summary of Shutdown Experience,Er Info & Tabulation of Facility Changes,Tests & Experiments ML20195B8511999-05-27027 May 1999 Forwards Change 4 to Rancho Seco Emergency Plan, Incorporating Commitments Made to NRC as Outlined in NRC .Emergency Plan Includes Two Listed Supporting Documents ML20207E9181999-05-27027 May 1999 Informs That Effective 990328,NRR Underwent Reorganization. within Framework of Reorganization,Div of Licensing Project Mgt Created.Reorganization Chart Encl ML20206U7411999-05-18018 May 1999 Provides Summary of 990217-18 Visit to Rancho Seco Facility to Become Familar with Facility,Including Onsite ISFSI & Meeting with Representatives of Smud to Discuss Issues Re Revised Rancho Seco Ep,Submitted to NRC on 960429 ML20206M1611999-05-10010 May 1999 Forwards Listed Proprietary Calculations to Support Review of Rancho Seco ISFSI Sar.Proprietary Encls Withheld ML20206E8591999-04-12012 April 1999 Provides Info Re High Total Coliform Result in Plant Domestic Sewage Effluent Prior to Confluence with Combined Effluent.Cause of High Total Coliform Result Was Broken Flow Rate Instrument.Instrument Was Repaired on 990318 ML20204H6751999-03-19019 March 1999 Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/99-02 on 990309-11.No Violations Noted.Portions of Physical Security & Access Authorization Programs Were Inspected ML20204E4031999-03-16016 March 1999 Submits Rept of Status of Decommissioning Funding for Rancho Seco,As Required by 10CFR50.75(f)(1).Plant Is Currently in Safstor, with Operating License Scheduled to Expire in Oct 2008 ML20204E6661999-03-11011 March 1999 Forwards Rancho Seco Exposure Rept for Individuals That Received Greater than 100 Mrem During 1998,IAW TS D6.9.2.2 & NRC Regulatory Guide 1.16 ML20204E6441999-03-11011 March 1999 Forwards Individual Monitoring Repts for Personnel That Required Radiation Exposure Monitoring During 1998 ML20207L1711999-03-10010 March 1999 Informs of Staff Determination That Supporting Calculations & Drawings Contained in Rev 2 of Sar, Should Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 NL-99-002, Submits Info About Property Insurance for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station,Iaw 10CFR50.54(w)(3)1999-03-10010 March 1999 Submits Info About Property Insurance for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station,Iaw 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20207D4431999-03-0101 March 1999 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept, for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station for 1998 ML20207H6181999-02-18018 February 1999 Provides Attached Metrix & Two Copies of Rancho Seco ISFSI Sar,Rev 2 on Compact Disc,As Requested in 990209 Meeting. First Rounds of RAIs Dealt Primarily with Use of Cask as Storage Cask.Without Compact Disc ML20203D0761999-02-10010 February 1999 Ltr Contract:Task Order 37 Entitled, Technical Assistance in Review of New Safety Analysis Rept for Rancho Seco Spent Fuel Storage Facility, Under Contract NRC-02-95-003 ML20155D4431998-10-27027 October 1998 Forwards Amend 3 to Rancho Seco Dsar,Representing Updated Licensing Basis for Operation of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Rancho Seco Nuclear Facility During Permanently Defueled Mode.With Instructions & List of Effective Pages NL-98-032, Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Util1998-09-30030 September 1998 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Util ML20237A6031998-08-0707 August 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/98-03 on 980706-09.No Violations Noted ML20237A9481998-08-0303 August 1998 Forwards Smud 1997 Annual Rept, IAW 10CFR50.71(b),which Includes Certified Financial Statements ML20236Q9461998-07-15015 July 1998 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/98-02 ML20236J6331998-06-30030 June 1998 Forwards Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/98-02.Corrective Actions:Util Revised RSAP-1003 to Clarify District Security Staff Responsibilities Re Handling & Review of Criminal History Info ML20236E8211998-06-0303 June 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/98-02 on 980519-21 & NOV Re Failure to Review & Consider All Info Obtained During Background Investigation.Areas Examined During Insp Also Included Portions of Physical Security Program ML20217G8391998-04-20020 April 1998 Forwards Copy of Rancho Seco Monthly Discharger Self-Monitoring Rept for Mar 1998 IR 05000312/19980011998-03-25025 March 1998 Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/98-01 on 980205 ML20217F1891998-03-18018 March 1998 Forwards Signed Original & Amend 7 to Rancho Seco Long Term Defueled Condition Physical Security Plan & Rev 4 to Long Term Defueled Condition Training & Qualification Plan.Encls Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20217G6661998-03-18018 March 1998 Forwards Discharge Self Monitoring Rept for Feb 1998, Which Makes Note of One Wastewater Discharge Permit Violation ML20217H0451998-03-18018 March 1998 Submits Rancho Seco Exposure Rept for Individuals Receiving Greater than 100 Mrem During 1997,per TS D6.9.2.2 & Guidance Contained in Reg Guide 1.16.No One Exposed to Greater than 100 Mrem in 1997 ML20216K1091998-03-11011 March 1998 Forwards NRC Form 5 Individual Monitoring Repts for Personnel Who Required Radiation Exposure Monitoring,Per 10CFR20.1502 During 1997.W/o Encl ML20217N9531998-03-0505 March 1998 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/98-01. Corrective Actions:Radiation Protection Group Wrote Potential Deviation from Quality (Pdq) 97-0082 & Assigned Radiation Protection Action to Determine Cause & CAs ML20203H7001998-02-25025 February 1998 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jan- Dec 1997, IAW 10CFR50.36a(a)(2) & TS D6.9.3.Revs to Radiological Environ Monitoring Manual & off-site Dose Calculation Manual,Encl ML20202G0131998-02-12012 February 1998 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements & Master Worker Policy Certificate of Insurace for Facility NL-98-006, Submits Annual Rept of Property Insurance Levels for Rsngs, IAW 10CFR50.54(w)(3)1998-02-12012 February 1998 Submits Annual Rept of Property Insurance Levels for Rsngs, IAW 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20202C4641998-02-0505 February 1998 Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/98-01 on 980105-08 & Notice of Violation.Insp Included Decommissioning & Dismantlement Work Underway,Verification of Compliance W/Selected TS & Main & Surveillance Activities Associated W/Sfp ML20199A5881997-11-10010 November 1997 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/97-01.Corrective Actions:Reviewed SFP Water Temp & Instrument Calibr Records,Generated Otr 97-001 to Document out-of-tolerance Instrument & Generated Pdq 97-0064 ML20198R9501997-11-0505 November 1997 Requests Interpretation of or Rev to NUREG-1536, Std Review Plan for Dry Cask Storage Sys, Re Compliance W/ 10CFR72.236(e) & 10CFR72.122(h)(4) for Dry Fuel Storage Casks ML20198K5391997-10-21021 October 1997 Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/97-04 on 970922-25 & Notice of Violation.Response Required & Will Be Used to Determine If Further Action Will Be Necessary ML20217D3101997-09-25025 September 1997 Forwards Update of 1995 Decommissioning Evaluation, for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generation Station & Annual Review of Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund for Adequacy Re Assumptions for Inflation & Rate of Return ML20211F0991997-09-23023 September 1997 Forwards One Certified Copy of Mutual Atomic Energy Liability Underwriters Nuclear Energy Liability Insurance Endorsement 120 for Policy MF-0075 for Smud Rancho Seco Nuclear Facility ML20198G8141997-08-22022 August 1997 Forwards Amend 125 to License DPR-54 & Safety Evaluation. Amend Permits Smud to Change TS to Incorporate Revised 10CFR20.Amend Also Revises References from NRC Region V to NRC Region IV ML20151L0281997-07-29029 July 1997 Provides Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re TS Change,Relocating Administrative Controls Related to QA to Ufsar,Per NUREG-0737 ML20149E5031997-07-10010 July 1997 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents. Forwards Records Listed in App C Being Made Available in Pdr.Records in App D Already Available in PDR ML20148P5161997-06-30030 June 1997 Second Partial Response to FOIA Request for Documents.App B Records Being Made Available in PDR ML20141A1721997-06-17017 June 1997 Forwards Insp Rept 50-312/97-03 on 970603-05.No Violations Noted.Areas Examined During Insp Included Portions of Physical Security Program 1999-08-31
[Table view] Category:INCOMING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEAR3F0799-22, Provides Update & Rev to Submittal Made by Util Ltr with Regard to EAL Classification Methodology for Unit 3.Reponses to NRC Staff Questions Provided as Attachment D to Ltr & Reflects Discussions Held1999-07-13013 July 1999 Provides Update & Rev to Submittal Made by Util Ltr with Regard to EAL Classification Methodology for Unit 3.Reponses to NRC Staff Questions Provided as Attachment D to Ltr & Reflects Discussions Held ML20210H9541999-07-0707 July 1999 Informs NRC of Change to Rancho Seco Decommissioning Schedule,As Described in Licensee Post Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20209D2501999-06-24024 June 1999 Informs That Util Has Revised All Sections of Rancho Seco Emergency Plan (Rsep),Change 4,effective 990624 ML20196G0431999-06-22022 June 1999 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Smud Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20195B8511999-05-27027 May 1999 Forwards Change 4 to Rancho Seco Emergency Plan, Incorporating Commitments Made to NRC as Outlined in NRC .Emergency Plan Includes Two Listed Supporting Documents ML20195D1851999-05-27027 May 1999 Forwards Rancho Seco Annual Rept, IAW Plant Permanently Defueled TS D6.9.4 & D6.9.6b.Rept Contains Shutdown Statistics,Narrative Summary of Shutdown Experience,Er Info & Tabulation of Facility Changes,Tests & Experiments ML20206M1611999-05-10010 May 1999 Forwards Listed Proprietary Calculations to Support Review of Rancho Seco ISFSI Sar.Proprietary Encls Withheld ML20206E8591999-04-12012 April 1999 Provides Info Re High Total Coliform Result in Plant Domestic Sewage Effluent Prior to Confluence with Combined Effluent.Cause of High Total Coliform Result Was Broken Flow Rate Instrument.Instrument Was Repaired on 990318 ML20204E4031999-03-16016 March 1999 Submits Rept of Status of Decommissioning Funding for Rancho Seco,As Required by 10CFR50.75(f)(1).Plant Is Currently in Safstor, with Operating License Scheduled to Expire in Oct 2008 ML20204E6441999-03-11011 March 1999 Forwards Individual Monitoring Repts for Personnel That Required Radiation Exposure Monitoring During 1998 ML20204E6661999-03-11011 March 1999 Forwards Rancho Seco Exposure Rept for Individuals That Received Greater than 100 Mrem During 1998,IAW TS D6.9.2.2 & NRC Regulatory Guide 1.16 NL-99-002, Submits Info About Property Insurance for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station,Iaw 10CFR50.54(w)(3)1999-03-10010 March 1999 Submits Info About Property Insurance for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station,Iaw 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20207D4431999-03-0101 March 1999 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept, for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station for 1998 ML20207H6181999-02-18018 February 1999 Provides Attached Metrix & Two Copies of Rancho Seco ISFSI Sar,Rev 2 on Compact Disc,As Requested in 990209 Meeting. First Rounds of RAIs Dealt Primarily with Use of Cask as Storage Cask.Without Compact Disc ML20155D4431998-10-27027 October 1998 Forwards Amend 3 to Rancho Seco Dsar,Representing Updated Licensing Basis for Operation of Permanently Shutdown & Defueled Rancho Seco Nuclear Facility During Permanently Defueled Mode.With Instructions & List of Effective Pages NL-98-032, Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Util1998-09-30030 September 1998 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Util ML20237A9481998-08-0303 August 1998 Forwards Smud 1997 Annual Rept, IAW 10CFR50.71(b),which Includes Certified Financial Statements ML20236J6331998-06-30030 June 1998 Forwards Response to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/98-02.Corrective Actions:Util Revised RSAP-1003 to Clarify District Security Staff Responsibilities Re Handling & Review of Criminal History Info ML20217G8391998-04-20020 April 1998 Forwards Copy of Rancho Seco Monthly Discharger Self-Monitoring Rept for Mar 1998 ML20217H0451998-03-18018 March 1998 Submits Rancho Seco Exposure Rept for Individuals Receiving Greater than 100 Mrem During 1997,per TS D6.9.2.2 & Guidance Contained in Reg Guide 1.16.No One Exposed to Greater than 100 Mrem in 1997 ML20217F1891998-03-18018 March 1998 Forwards Signed Original & Amend 7 to Rancho Seco Long Term Defueled Condition Physical Security Plan & Rev 4 to Long Term Defueled Condition Training & Qualification Plan.Encls Withheld,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20217G6661998-03-18018 March 1998 Forwards Discharge Self Monitoring Rept for Feb 1998, Which Makes Note of One Wastewater Discharge Permit Violation ML20216K1091998-03-11011 March 1998 Forwards NRC Form 5 Individual Monitoring Repts for Personnel Who Required Radiation Exposure Monitoring,Per 10CFR20.1502 During 1997.W/o Encl ML20217N9531998-03-0505 March 1998 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/98-01. Corrective Actions:Radiation Protection Group Wrote Potential Deviation from Quality (Pdq) 97-0082 & Assigned Radiation Protection Action to Determine Cause & CAs ML20203H7001998-02-25025 February 1998 Forwards Annual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept for Jan- Dec 1997, IAW 10CFR50.36a(a)(2) & TS D6.9.3.Revs to Radiological Environ Monitoring Manual & off-site Dose Calculation Manual,Encl NL-98-006, Submits Annual Rept of Property Insurance Levels for Rsngs, IAW 10CFR50.54(w)(3)1998-02-12012 February 1998 Submits Annual Rept of Property Insurance Levels for Rsngs, IAW 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20202G0131998-02-12012 February 1998 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements & Master Worker Policy Certificate of Insurace for Facility ML20199A5881997-11-10010 November 1997 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/97-01.Corrective Actions:Reviewed SFP Water Temp & Instrument Calibr Records,Generated Otr 97-001 to Document out-of-tolerance Instrument & Generated Pdq 97-0064 ML20198R9501997-11-0505 November 1997 Requests Interpretation of or Rev to NUREG-1536, Std Review Plan for Dry Cask Storage Sys, Re Compliance W/ 10CFR72.236(e) & 10CFR72.122(h)(4) for Dry Fuel Storage Casks ML20217D3101997-09-25025 September 1997 Forwards Update of 1995 Decommissioning Evaluation, for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generation Station & Annual Review of Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund for Adequacy Re Assumptions for Inflation & Rate of Return ML20211F0991997-09-23023 September 1997 Forwards One Certified Copy of Mutual Atomic Energy Liability Underwriters Nuclear Energy Liability Insurance Endorsement 120 for Policy MF-0075 for Smud Rancho Seco Nuclear Facility ML20151L0281997-07-29029 July 1997 Provides Response to NRC Request for Addl Info Re TS Change,Relocating Administrative Controls Related to QA to Ufsar,Per NUREG-0737 NL-97-030, Forwards Endorsement 132 to Nelia Policy NF-0212 & Endorsement 118 to Maelu Policy MF-0075 for Smuds Rsngs1997-05-13013 May 1997 Forwards Endorsement 132 to Nelia Policy NF-0212 & Endorsement 118 to Maelu Policy MF-0075 for Smuds Rsngs ML20138F5321997-04-28028 April 1997 Forwards Response to RAI Re License Amend 192,updating Cask Drop Design Basis Analysis,Per NRC 960510 Request for Addl Info on 960318 Application NL-97-027, Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Utility1997-04-17017 April 1997 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Utility ML20137W8091997-03-20020 March 1997 Forwards Biennial Update to Rancho Seco Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20137S3571997-03-19019 March 1997 Provides Notification of Use of Revised Quality Manual for Activities Re Rancho Seco ISFSI ML20137D0981997-03-18018 March 1997 Submits Rancho Seco Exposure Rept for Individuals Receiving Greater than 100 Mrem During 1996.Provided IAW TS D6.9.2.2 & Guidance Contained in NRC Reg Guide 1.16.No One Exposed to Greater than 100 Mrem in 1996 ML20137D1221997-03-18018 March 1997 Submits,Iaw 10CFR20.2206 & TS D6.9.2.1,1996 NRC Form 5 Individual Monitoring Repts for Personnel Requiring Radiation Exposure Monitoring Per 10CFR20.1502 During 1996. W/O Encl NL-97-012, Submits Rept of Listed Current Levels of Property Insurance for Plant,Iaw 10CFR50.54(w)(3)1997-02-11011 February 1997 Submits Rept of Listed Current Levels of Property Insurance for Plant,Iaw 10CFR50.54(w)(3) ML20138L1091997-01-29029 January 1997 Informs of Schedule Change Re Decommissioning of Rancho Seco.Incremental Decommissioning Action Plan,Encl NL-97-005, Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Utility1997-01-22022 January 1997 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Utility NL-96-056, Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Util1996-12-16016 December 1996 Forwards Certified Copies of Listed Nuclear Liability Endorsements for Util ML20134E0041996-10-23023 October 1996 Forwards Response to NRC GL 96-04, Boraflex Degradation in Spent Fuel Pool Storage Racks ML18102B6871996-08-0606 August 1996 Informs That Util Will Revise Loading & Unloading Procedures & Operator Training as Necessary ML20149E4491994-05-16016 May 1994 Forwards 1993 Annual Rept of Sacramento Municipal Utility District,For Info ML20149E3971994-05-10010 May 1994 Forwards Re Updated Decommissioning Cost Estimate for Rancho Seco & Attached Rept by Tlg Engineering,Inc. W/Svc List ML20059H6731994-01-20020 January 1994 Forwards Revised Rancho Seco Quality Manual, Reflecting Current Rancho Seco Pol Phase Nuclear Organization Changes ML20059E1221994-01-0303 January 1994 Forwards Amend 7 to Long Term Defueled Condition Physical Security Plan.Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR73) ML20059C1681993-12-22022 December 1993 Forwards Suppl Info to Support Review & Approval of 930514 Proposed License Amend 186 Re Nuclear Organization Changes, Per NRC Request 1999-07-07
[Table view] Category:UTILITY TO NRC
MONTHYEARML20059L5431990-09-20020 September 1990 Requests Exemptions from Certain Requirements of 10CFR50.47(b) & 50,App E & Proposes New Emergency Plan That Specifically Applies to Long Term Defueled Condition ML20059J9161990-09-13013 September 1990 Notification of Change in Operator/Senior Operator Status for R Groehler,Effective 900907 ML20059J9221990-09-13013 September 1990 Responds to Generic Ltr 90-03, Relaxation of Staff Position in Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2,Part 2, 'Vendor Interface for Safety-Related Components.' No Vendor Interface Exists for Spent Fuel Pool Liner NL-90-442, Forwards Endorsements 13 to Nelia Certificate N-49 & Maelu Certificate M-49,Endorsements 91 & 92 to Maelu Policy MF-75 & Endorsements 103 & 104 to Nelia Policy NF-2121990-09-12012 September 1990 Forwards Endorsements 13 to Nelia Certificate N-49 & Maelu Certificate M-49,Endorsements 91 & 92 to Maelu Policy MF-75 & Endorsements 103 & 104 to Nelia Policy NF-212 ML20059G0791990-09-0606 September 1990 Forwards Supplemental Fitness for Duty Performance Data, Omitted from 900725 Rept Re Random Drug Testing Results ML20059E0031990-08-30030 August 1990 Forwards Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Rept,Jan- June 1990, Corrected Repts & Revs to ODCM ML20059C2491990-08-27027 August 1990 Advises That M Foster & B Rausch Leaving Util Effective on 900810 & 17,respectively & Will No Longer Require Active Operator Licenses ML20056B2591990-08-20020 August 1990 Forwards Long-Term Defueled Condition Security Training & Qualification Plan. Encl Withheld (Ref 10CFR2.790) ML20056B2961990-08-10010 August 1990 Discusses 900731 Meeting Re Future of Util & Closure & Decommissioning of Facility.Request for Possession Only License Pending Before Commission ML20058Q2811990-08-0909 August 1990 Forwards Updated Listing of Commitments & long-range Scope List Items Deferred or Closed by Commitment Mgt Review Group Since Last Update ML20058N0911990-08-0707 August 1990 Notifies of Minor Change in List of Tech Specs Applicable in Plant Defueled Condition.Determined That Surveillance Requirements Table 4.1-1,Item 63 Not Required to Be Included in List of Tech Specs Applicable in Defueled Condition ML20056A1131990-07-30030 July 1990 Apprises of Status of Plans to Use 3 of 4 Emergency Diesel Generators as Peaking Power Supplies & Responds to Questions in .Util Obtained Authorization for Operation of Diesel Generators for No More than 90 Days Per Yr ML20056A2041990-07-30030 July 1990 Provides Response to NRC Bulletin 90-001, Loss of Fill Oil in Transmitters Mfg by Rosemount. Pressure & Differential Pressure Transmitters 1153 & 1154 Do Not Perform Any safety-related Function in Current Plant Mode ML20055J0311990-07-25025 July 1990 Forwards fitness-for-duty Performance Data for Facility from 900103-0630 ML20055J0331990-07-25025 July 1990 Notifies of Change in Operator/Senior Operator Status. Operators Terminating Employment & No Longer Require License ML20055H8081990-07-24024 July 1990 Forwards Decommissioning Financial Plan for Plant,Per 10CFR50.33(k)(2) & Requests Interim Exemption Re Requirement to Have Full Decommissioning Funding at Time of Termination of Operation,Per 10CFR50.12 ML20055H7561990-07-24024 July 1990 Requests Exemption from Performing Annual Exercise of Emergency Plan,Activation of Alert & Notification Sys & Distribution of Public Info Brochures,Per 10CFR50.12 Requirements ML20055F8421990-07-13013 July 1990 Forwards Application for Proposed Decommissioning of Plant. Util Needs Relief from Equipment Maint,Surveillance,Staffing & Other Requirements Not Necessary to Protect Public Health & Safety During Defueled Condition ML20055G9821990-07-12012 July 1990 Advises That Environ Exposure Controls Action Plan Will Be Provided by Sept 1990,per Insp Rept 50-312/90-02 ML20055E5111990-07-0606 July 1990 Notifies of Change in Operator/Senior Operator Status for D Rosenbaum & M Cooper,Effective 900622 & 29,respectively ML20055C3541990-02-14014 February 1990 Forwards Updated Response to Insp Rept 50-312/88-30. Calculations for Liquid Effluent Monitors Completed & in Use & Rev to Reg Guide 4.15 in Procedure RSAP-1702 Scheduled to Be Completed & Implemented by Apr 1990 ML20055C3511990-02-14014 February 1990 Forwards Addl Info Re 900306 Response to NRC Bulletin 88-003, Inadequate Latch Engagement in Hfa Type Latching Relays Mfg by Ge. Util Will Replace Only Relays Found Not to Meet Insp Criteria ML20248H2571989-10-0606 October 1989 Responds to NRC Re Addendum to Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 92 to License DPR-54 Re Reactor Vessel Vent Valve Testing.No Testing of Reactor Vessel Vent Valves Will Be Performed ML20248H2391989-10-0606 October 1989 Requests Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR26 Re Fitness for Duty Programs Based on Present & Future Operational Configuration ML20248A8271989-09-25025 September 1989 Requests Permission to Submit Next Amend to Updated FSAR W/Decommissioning Plan Submittal.Extension Will Allow District to Incorporate Plant Closure Status in SAR Update to Reflect Plant Conditions Accurately ML20248D4611989-09-13013 September 1989 Responds to 890906 Request for Assessment of Util Compliance W/Ol & Associated Programs & Commitments,Per 10CFR50.54(f). Staffing Requirements for Emergency Preparedness Will Not Be Violated & Future Shortfalls Will Be Remedied ML20247G1991989-09-11011 September 1989 Requests Extension for Time Period Equivalent to That of Current Shutdown.Extension Would Result in Revised Final Expiration Date of Not Earlier than 900318.Plant Would Not Be Brought Above Cold Shutdown W/O NRC Prior Concurrence ML20247H3551989-09-0707 September 1989 Informs That Util Stands by Commitments of 890621 & 0829 Re Implementation of Closure Plan in Safe & Deliberate Manner in Compliance W/License & W/All Applicable Laws & Regulations ML20247H5541989-09-0101 September 1989 Responds to Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/89-14. Corrective Actions:Stop Order on Fuel Movement Issued & Action Plan Generated on 890908 to Address Broader Issues 05000312/LER-1988-010, Forwards Rev 1 to LER 88-010,due to Change in Commitment Date for re-evaluating Fire Zones.Date Changed to 901001. Zones re-evaluated in Conjunction W/Mods to Fire Detection Annunciator Sys1989-08-23023 August 1989 Forwards Rev 1 to LER 88-010,due to Change in Commitment Date for re-evaluating Fire Zones.Date Changed to 901001. Zones re-evaluated in Conjunction W/Mods to Fire Detection Annunciator Sys ML20246A4011989-08-16016 August 1989 Forwards Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program Plan. Changes Identified Consistent W/Guidance Provided by Generic Ltr 89-04 NL-89-593, Forwards Plant Closure Organizational Charts & Administrative Procedure RSAP-0101,per 890802 Request1989-08-15015 August 1989 Forwards Plant Closure Organizational Charts & Administrative Procedure RSAP-0101,per 890802 Request ML20245H4781989-08-10010 August 1989 Requests Exemption from Generic Ltr 89-07, Power Reactor Safeguards Contingency Planning for Surface Vehicle Bombs Because on 890607,util Board of Directors Ordered That Plant Cease Operation ML20245H1781989-08-0909 August 1989 Notifies of Change in Operator/Senior Operator Status. J Dailey & J Reynolds Terminated Employment on 890721 & 890802,respectively ML20245L1831989-08-0808 August 1989 Informs That Official Correspondence Must Be Directed to Listed Individuals Due to Reorganization of Util Following 890606 Election ML20247L9221989-07-26026 July 1989 Provides Revised Response to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-312/88-33.Corrective Action:Portable Shield Walls Inspected Every 6 Months to Ensure All Safety Factors Met & Area Surveys Conducted on Weekly Basis ML20247M4121989-07-24024 July 1989 Requests Exemption from 10CFR50,App E,Section IV.F.2 to Allow Util Not to Perform Annual Emergency Plan Exercise for 1989.Request Results from Transitional Mode of Plant from Operating Plant to Plant Preparing for Decommissioning NL-89-541, Requests That Completion Date for Addl Training of Personnel Involved in Performing Work on Environ Qualified Equipment Be Extended from 890616 to 8912151989-07-14014 July 1989 Requests That Completion Date for Addl Training of Personnel Involved in Performing Work on Environ Qualified Equipment Be Extended from 890616 to 891215 ML20246P4011989-07-14014 July 1989 Informs That Evaluation of Contracts & Agreements Identified No Restrictions on Employee Ability to Provide Info About Potential Safety Issues to NRC NL-89-547, Forwards Amend 110 to License DPR-54,issued on 890609, Identifying Discrepancy in Tech Spec Page X (Table of Contents) Which Does Not Reflect Changes Approved in Amend 1061989-07-0606 July 1989 Forwards Amend 110 to License DPR-54,issued on 890609, Identifying Discrepancy in Tech Spec Page X (Table of Contents) Which Does Not Reflect Changes Approved in Amend 106 ML20246A9751989-06-30030 June 1989 Advises That Concerns Addressed in Generic Ltr 89-08 Inapplicable,Since Util Intends to Defuel Reactor.Generic Ltr Will Be Reviewed Prior to Placing Facility in heatup-cooldown Operational Mode for Return to Power ML20246A5171989-06-30030 June 1989 Forwards Rancho Seco Closure Plan, Per 890621 Request for Addl Info Re Plan CEO-89-289, Notifies of Change in Operator/Senior Operator Status.Listed Operator/Senior Operator Terminated Employment on Listed Effective Date1989-06-27027 June 1989 Notifies of Change in Operator/Senior Operator Status.Listed Operator/Senior Operator Terminated Employment on Listed Effective Date NL-89-526, Lists Discrepancies Noted in Amend 109 to License DPR-54,per 890615 Discussion W/S Reynolds.Tech Specs Encl1989-06-22022 June 1989 Lists Discrepancies Noted in Amend 109 to License DPR-54,per 890615 Discussion W/S Reynolds.Tech Specs Encl ML20245H4181989-06-21021 June 1989 Discusses Util Plans Re Overall Closure of Plant,Per 890615 Meeting W/Nrc.Util Will Request Appropriate Changes to Tech Specs to Reflect Defueled Mode & Will Evaluate & Request Changes to Emergency Plan ML20245D9281989-06-21021 June 1989 Discusses Activities Underway Re Plan for Closure of Plant Discussed During 890615 Meeting W/Region V.Util Intends to Continue Use of Essential Programs,Such as Preventive Maint Program,For Sys within Scope of Closure Process ML20245A0981989-06-16016 June 1989 Responds to NRC Bulletin 89-001, Failure of Westinghouse Steam Generator Tube Mechanical Plugs. No Westinghouse Plugs Used at Plant ML20248B5751989-06-0202 June 1989 Advises That Util Anticipates That Final Analysis of Thermal Striping Will Conservatively Support Surge Line Lifetime Significantly Longer than June 1994 Date,Per NRC Bulletin 88-011, Pressurizer Surge Line Thermal Stratification NL-89-468, Submits Justification for Absence of Functional Testing Requirement in Proposed Tech Spec 4.14(f) Re Snubber Svc Life Monitoring,Per 890517 Request1989-05-30030 May 1989 Submits Justification for Absence of Functional Testing Requirement in Proposed Tech Spec 4.14(f) Re Snubber Svc Life Monitoring,Per 890517 Request ML20247N2601989-05-25025 May 1989 Requests Guidance Re Whether NRC Concurs W/Arbitrator Order Concerning Employee Access to Plant 1990-09-06
[Table view] |
Text
i . . ., .
huo SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT O P. O. Box 15830, Sacramento CA
., 4p 95852 1830,(9 [4 n 2 3'2 @
RNIA i
October 16, 1987 AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING g lT GCA 87-673 k l j
I U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Es l
Attn: J. B. Martin, Regional Administrator l Region V Office of Inspection and Enforcement
@C5 2c ;
I 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Halnut Creek, CA 94596
$$ i 4
m i !
,0 L DOCKET N0. 50-312 e i RANCHO SEC0 NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION N l
LICENSE NO. DPR-54 VERIFICATION AND VALIDATION OF C00LDOHN PROCEDURES
Dear Mr. Martin:
l l !
Por the telephone conversation between Mr. Chris Caldwell of Nuclear Regulatory !
Commission, Region V, and our Dennis Tipton and Steve Redeker, I am enclosing marked up copies of the portions of the Abnormal Transient Operating Guidelines !
(ATOG) manual used in the discussion about the Verification and Validation of l Cooldown Procedures (cps). The ATOG manual makes a distinction between l
" Guidelines" and "Cooldown procedures." Also, Rancho Seco Administrative i' Procedure AP.47, " Emergency Procedures Writer's Guide," states in Step 3.2 that Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) are designated by the letter "E".
Based on these excerpts from ATOG and AP.47, which were originally submitted to NRR as part of the District's original Procedures Generation Package, the District has defined the E0Ps. Therefore, your concern about the V & V of cps l should be resolved. Also enclosed is a copy of the original ATOG manual, l Revision 0 for yc.ur information. l If you have any further questions on the matter, please contact Dennis Tipton j of my staff at Extension 4548. l l
Sincerely, h(
G. Carl Andognini l Chief Executive Officer, Nuclear 8710260410 871016' l PDR ADOCK 05000312 l Attachment P PDR l cc: G. Kalman, NRC, Bethesda (w/o atch)
A. D'Angelo, NRC, Rancho Seco (w/o atch) .
F. J. Miraglia, NRR,'Bethesda (w/o atch) j
-pu/ ,
i RANCHO SECO NUCLEAR GENERATING STATloN O 1444o Twin Cities Road, Herald, CA 95638-9799;(209) 333 2935 J
q 7'0-- . : <
,. .g . BWNP-20007 (6-76)
" BABCOCK & WILCOX NUCLtAt POWER otNERAfloN otVISloN .
1 TECHNICAL DOCUMENT 74-1127469-00 I
1 i
I Objectives: a) minimize offsite releases b) t e rmina t e leakage before BWST depletion I c) maintain core cooling / expedient cooldown and I depressurization Key Points: a) transient (leakage) not terminated until RCS cooled ,
depressurized, and drained below tube leak elevation 1
b) LOOP / natural circulation cooldown will probably result l l
in highe r offsite releases due to greater need to steam j the affected SG to the atmosphere 1
c) natural circulation cooldown necessitates use of EMOV l x ,~ m ,~ v ~ ~ ,.
to reduce RCS pressure , e, 1
pesare25N8* U42. cj v Afl,Cv4 WhM u
i0 "N 1 W
f }Q
')h Cooldown Procedures / Inadequate Core Cooling ~) %Jw-
, ,.- - s The objective of these guidelines is to maintain adequate core cooling by !
- w_
t e rmina t ing t rans ie nt s and stabilizing the plants with controlled decay y/ 4 heat removal. Once stable conditions are achieved, further plant cooldown can be accceplished by existing plant proc ed ure s .
tions at stabilization following the execution of the guidelines will not However, the end condi-nec es s aril y coincide with the entry conditions for plant cooldown proced-m F gff ures. There fo re , procedures are provided in Part I to accomplish the p 4
( q 4
[ transit ion fecu the guidelines to the plant pec c ed ur e s . Five cooldown f k (*N }
p i procedures are provided to cover five possible end ccr.ditiona $
1 1) Cooldown following a large LOCA 4
A 0
N 2) Normal cooldom
, 3 4; 3) Saturated cooldovn with primary to secondary heat tr ans f e r i
I -
DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE 254
1
'. l p%' '
BWNT-20007 (6-76)
BABCOCK & WILCOX 6ER i
NUCLEAR Powin GENtRAf ton clVIStoN j TECHNICAL. DOCUMENT 74-1127469-00 l
a I
- 4) HPI cooling
{
ha I
jj 5) Solid plant cooldown/ recovery from solid plant. j e '
3 A sixth procedure is provided for the special case of Inadequate Core Cool-L; j ing (ICC). The philosophy and the objectives of the actions for ICC are 0 I
discussed in detail in the " Backup Cooling Methods" chapter in Volume 1 of I Part II. Y l
warwann At the end of the section containing the five cooldown proc ed ures (immedi- ;
i ately be fore the ICC section) are specific rules. These rules are pro- j vided in a separate section to avoid repetition throughout Section III of the guidelines. These rules apply wherever they are referenced in Section
/] j III. Specific rules are provided to cover:
l
- 1) Initiation of RPI l)
- 2) ELDI flow control i 1
- 3) Feedwater throttling methods i l
- 4) SC level setpoint.
In addition, three fig ur es are provided at the back of Part I fo r easy ;
1
' reference during the use of the guidelines. These figures provide: l
- 1) HP I flow vs . RCS pressure r l
- 2) RCS pres sure-temperature limits for brit tle fr ac t ur e / tiDT
- 3) Incore exit thermocouple temperature for ICC ;
i Goerator Aids '
In addition to the guidelines in Part I and the training material in Part DATE: PAGE 10-8-82 255
r__ _ ._
. J, f .. l
.u ..
1
- a s BWNP-20007 (6-76) i
- '.' BABCOCK & WILCOX
-, sucteAa rowen oesen4rios civisios . -DDr - I TECHNICAL DOCUMENT /$ . ,1 4'-1127469-00 ,
f
~
Y$ fu$j} 01 Nor CHAPTER C ('00(20m C/064t bl5ttMcN ABNORMAL TRANSIENT DIAGNOSIS AND MITIGATION !
Introduction This chapter shows how an abnormal translent can be diagnosed and I mitigated using the information provided by the P-T diagram and the concepts on heat trans fer discussed in the previous chapters. A simplified flow chart of the approach to be used to diagnose and mitigate an ab no rmal transient is provided in Figure 20A " General Plant Transient 1
Mitigation". It is broken down into a few separate steps . although these steps will blend together into one con t inuous process in actual practice.
The Abnormal Transient Operating Guidelines are implemented whenever an m
- automatic or manual reactor trip occurs or a' forced shutdown is necessary.
l l
The guidelines are provided in Part I. They list the appropriate operator l
actions necessary to mitigate an abnormal transient. They follow the approach outlined in Figure 20A. The guidelines incorporate the following features.
l
- 1. Use of the P-T diagram which provides a constant feedback to the operator on his success or failure after taking each step in Part I.
This diagram should be checked frequently to make sure th ing s are progressing as expected. It will thus give the operator esrly indications of s ub s eque n t f ailure s that are delayed after the initial event, or mult iple failures that were masked by the predominant event and thus didn' t appear until that one was corrected.
DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE 74
____________-:_-_-_-_-_______a
a
'. 'j
. , : BWNP-20007 (6-76) '
' . BABCOCK & WILCOX , .
NUCLEAR POWER oENERAflON DIVIS10N
.~
TECHNICAL. DOCUMENT FE 1!27469-00
/j
- 2. The guidelines are constructed such that the c.perator makes an attempt I
to correct the problem with a given piece of equipment 'or system (e.g.,
AFW to correct loss of main feedwater). If that' fails he is instructed.
l to go on to the next available syste'n (e.g., HP1 cooling). The failure o? a particular syatem (e.g., the AFW system) is. not given priority attention in Part I, protection of the core is.
i
- 3. The operator is given fdquent present plant status ( STATUS) aids throughout the procedure to help him maictaiu proper orientation.
l
- 4. If new symptoms appear he is instru :ed a recycle (go to the . section l
' ,4:
that treats that symptom) to the 'appropiate part of the procedure . )
)
i I
A detailed discussion or. the use of the guidelines in Part I is provided i in Chapter H of this volume.
Immediate Actions ,
The first block in Figure 20A is the "Immediate Actions" block. The i:amediate actions should be completed in the first 2-3-minutes. The first action to be made is to determine' if a reactor trip has occurred or pla nt.
conditiens requiring a forced shutdown exist. If a reacter trip has occ urred the operator should manually trip the reactor and turbine, then ,
proceed to the next post trip step of the ATOG procedure which is. Vital Systems Status Ve r i f ic a t ions " . However, if plant cond i t io ns ' ' war r ant a forced shutdown, the operator should ini t ia t e the appropriate shutdown
.DATE: 10- 8-82 PAGE 75
..._1 _ . . _ . '2
1
.+ .,
BWNP-20007 (6-76)
BABCOCK & WILCOX ER j l
NUCLEAR PowfR GENERATION DIVI $loN
^' 74- 27ce e00 TECHNICAL DOCUMENT ]i l
1 procedure. When the reactor is tripped during the forced shutdown I 7perations, the post-trip ATOG procedures should be implemented. If the
);
I forced shutd own is due to a steam generator tube rupture (SGTR) the operator should. proceed directly to III D of the guidelines. )
l l
l 1
Vital Systems Status Verification l j
The next major block on Figure 20A is the Vit al Systems Status Veri-1 fication. This section requires reviewing specific plant status items including the P-T diagram to determine if they are behaving as they should )
i for' a normal reactor trip. If the s pecific plant status items cannot be ]
1 1 l ve ri fied as performing as expected, the operator should perform the l
l A specified remedial actions. The proced ures provide specific remedial
) i j i
d actions for each plant status item which cannot be verified. The plant status items which are checked first are the normal automatic post trip.
f unct ions which control core re ac t iv i ty , primary and seconda ry inventory,
\
l and primary and secondary pressure. ~
l l \
l l
l j Next the operator must verify the operability of certain power supplies to
~
l assure the important plant parameters can be monitored and the power is l
l available to the im po r t ant control devices. . These include pumps, valves, etc., which are needed to safely control the plant and to mitigate abnor-1 mal transients. The plant cannot be controlled or abnormal transients mitigated if the control devices do not work. Nor can the plant be safely controlled if the instrumentation parameters to be controlled are not available for diagnosing the plant status.
DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE 76 l - . _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ______________:J
'4. BWNP-20007 (6-76)
' BABCOCK & WILCOX NuuaEn NUCLEAR POWER oENtAATioN DIVl5loH 'N 1
%'l TECHNICAL. DOCUMENT 74-1127469-00 ~{
1 Next the operator must check to see if any safety systems have been actuated and if so that they are operating properly. For example if the operator notes the presence of a high reactor building pressure alarm of :l l
30 psig he will be directed to verify actuation of the re ac t o r building _.
j i
spray system. )
I Next, the operator needs to check the P-T diagram fo r , a los s of subcool-ing margin, " overcooling" or " overheating" conditions. T able 2 summarizes generally the plant status items to be checked and the actions to be taken I
if the items are not as they should be. !
p.
)i Finally the operator stust check to see if there are any steam generator 9/
tube failures.
The P-T diagram is the foundat ion for transient diagnosis and fo r the actions to correct abnormal transients.
l l
When the PT diag ram is checked, the reactor P-T should stay within the ,
" post trip" window and steam pressure should stay above the steam pressure i
i limit of 960 psig. If the plant res pond s so th a t these limits are not 4 l
exceeded then the transient is going "as expected". If the plant does not fe i "go as expected" the P-T characteristic should be checked to find out the i
" type" of abnormal transient so that proper corrective act'ons i can be made j i
to restore the reactor-steam generator heat transfer. )
a 1
DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE' 77 J
.. , BWNP-20007 (6-76) c BABCOCK & WILCOX N M8ER 1
NUCLEAR power oENERATION OlVISION TECHNICAL DOCUMENT If the Vital Systems Status Verification shows everything is alright , then the pl ant is in a s t ab le subcooled condition with pr ope r primary to secondary heat transfer and no major primary boundary failures. Further j l
action will be at the discretion of the station management. ,
I
.~ '
- ]
I If one or more items are not alright, the ATOG procedure will direct the k l
operator to make a remedial action. The remedial action may be a finite action such as closing a valve or a " Followup Action".
l 1
i Followup Action )
As shown on Figure 20A when the P-T diagram indicates a " loss of subcool-
[ %, ing margin, " overheating" or " overcooling", exists the operator must d e te rmine wh ich one of the three conditions exist, and then start the
]
appropriate followup actions procedure. These followup actions are first 1
di rec t ed at rees t ab li shing the correct amount of steam generator cooling. )
l If it cannot be reestablished, then backup cooling methods are to be I implemented. (The backup cooling methods are di sc us sed in Chapter D of Part II).
Once s t e an generator heat t rans fer or backup cooling has been established ,
i the plant should be brought to a stable condition for plant cooldown. The condi tion may be het or ccid depencing on the circums t ances ; a return to the " post trip" window is not required for plant stability.
~
l l
l l
i i
DATE: 10- 8-82 PAGE 73 ]
b
.. . . .i
^
BWNP-20007 (6-76):
.B ABCOCK '& WILCOX. guy ,,, i NutLtAR POWER GENERATION OtVi$roN TECHNICAL.' DOCl] MENT 74-1127469-00 -
=_.___ a_----- -mmarmemmmassammemmamen-amme. = __ __ --
Cooldown Procedures i Once stable plant conditions are reached, the plant is cooled down using
.kl i one of several cooldown procedures depending on the existing stable plant ( ,
e N I conditions such as a solid water system or saturated RCS. ; 4 r; .T _ heat 00 _
j
] g proc ed ures state which cooldown procedure~~~. to use. This is discussed in V i
i
- n- m. ,
f j the Post-Accident Stability Chapter of AT00.
_$ _ mmian , a,- = ~ n- - -~ - - - - - -
=;wommwl Inadequate Core Cooline In the eve nt that neither ateam generato r cooling nor backup cooling is ;
l e s t ab li sh ed , " Inadequate Core Cooling: will occur. Th is topic is i discussed in the Backup Cooling Chapter.
T. i
, i i
-) !
.+ ,
Abnormal Transient Diagnosis and Treatment
)
Although the type of transient may have become evident during 'the first 2 l
l l or 3 minutes after trip, plant monitoring is required to make sure that 1
the transient is going as expected. Generally, after 2 or 3 minutes the i plant will begin to stabilize within the " Post Trip Window" (examples of l 8
i this were given in the P-T Diagram Chapter). Actions have already been !
t ake n to identify and handle the " fast" excessive main feedwater transient and the systems which should be operating have been checked to make sure ,
I i
thac they are working correctly. Further plant mo n i to ring should ' begin, l i
At this stsge the- e f for t should new be to make sure chat the plant i i
sesbilizes as it should. )i 1
1 d
i
+ ;
, 4 1 -
i DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE 79 i
- , . i e s
. *. '. ;. s ..
~
~'
4
, BWNP-20007 (6-76)
BABCOCK &.WILCOX
- ,_, NUCLEAR POWER GENERADON DMSION Nuest ' 74-1127469-00 .
TECHNICAL DOCUMENT !
i l
To do this the P-T diagram is kept under surveillance. If reactor coolant 3
. pressure and tem pe ra tur e stabilize within the P-T post trip wind o w, and i steam pressure is above the- low steam' pressure limit, the transient is-probably not abnormal and a quick check of the following should be made ' to c' ' '
ensure system and equipment parameters are within expected values: .l Heat Transfer Balance Indicators
)
P-T diagram ( for RC pressure and temperature and subcooling and secondary saturation temperaute)' -l 1
l
- Pressurizer Level .
i
~
- Steam generator level and pressure
,, l
[ 'l
, ') ,
DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE 80
{ ,. -. BWNP-20007_(6-76)-
BABCOCK & WILCOX Nu e te NUtttAR PowtA GENERAtloN DIVIsloN
~
- TECHNICAL. DOCUMENT- 74-1123298-00 .
[
I I
Equipment Status and. Operation (depending on what was started); i
- Makeup /HPI flow rates and pump status-
- Main or auxiliary feedwater flow rates and pump status l
- RC pump operation including cooling water and seal injection service
- Position of important valves (letdown, EMOV, feedwater isolation s and control valves, pressurizer spray valve)
- Reactor Building isolation and cooling systems I
- Power supplies (AC and DC) l Once these reviews are completed a more thorough check can be cond uc t ed and a decision made to determine if the plant is stable. (Refer to the Chapter F on "Pos t Trans ient Stability Determination" .)
1 /
,s 1
i But if the first review of the P-T indic at es that the reactor coolant pressure and tem pe r a tur e are not going to remain within the pos t-trip window (or return to it), or that steam pressure is below the steam pressure limit, then some thing is wrong with heat transfer and corrective actions are required to bring the heat transfer into balance, i
l DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE 81 L .
BWNP-20007 (6-76)-
' BABCOCK E. WILCOX Nu d
. NUCttAR POWER GENERATION DIYl5loN
' O[/V
' E TECHNICAL. DOCUMENT , Res^f#fil27469-00 4
'<l ogy l I CHAPTER F A l0 30
. POST TRANSIENT STABILITY DETERMINATION To determine if the transient has been brought under control- four general 1
areas must be checked. ;
- 1. Reactivity Control - The reactor must have a suberitical margin of j at least 1% ak/k.
- 2. Core Heat Removal Control - The core must be c"vered and cooled; i i
the heat removal rate is equal to or slightly greater than the core heat generation rate.
- 3. Radiation Release Control - Release to of fsite is terminated .
- 4. Plant Equipment is Operating Correctly - Equipment to maintain the
, ) plant
/ safe and stable is operating and within design duty; !
equipment. f ailures have been bypassed , isolated or repaired .
Several things around the plant must be chec ked to make sure these four !
l general rules are being met. The following basic check list defines the more impo r t ant items. The list is divided into two cases. Case I applies l to LOCA's which can be stopped by complete isolation of the leak and to all other t rans ient s. Case II applies to LOCA's which cannot be isolated.
i The difference be tween the two parts is simple:
a reactor leak that can-not be s top ped is a transient that cannot be po s it iv ely t e rm ina t ed . How-eve:, a leak can be reduc ed to the smallest amotnt pos s ible and becoma i I
stable fo r "l o ng -t e rm c oo li ng" .
Steam generator heat removal can be u s ed for some small leaks but HPI or MU mu s t be kept r unning to maintain the i i
reactor coolant inve n to ry . Subcooling can be regained for some very small i
DATE: 10- 8-82 PAGE '166 ;
- l. .-l
_ _ . . __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _m _ _
_j
i
- 4 i
BWNP-20007 (6-76)'
BABCOCK & WILCOX NuusEn NUCLEAR POWER GENERATION DIVI $loN - %.,
TECHNICAL DOCUMENT 74-1127469-00 '
break sizes at a time when the decay heat decreases and HPI is able to refill the RCS loops and add water to the pressurizer.
Case 1 - All transients (including LOCA's which can be isolated) =
- 1. Reactor coolant pressure and temperature are pre fe rably within the "po s t-t r i p window" of the P-T diagram;. however, pressure and temperature may be anywhe re on the P-T diagram within a region bounded by; a) NDT limits, b) the subcooling ' margin, c) an RC l
pr e s s ure upper limit equal to the EMOV setpoint, d) fuel pin j compression limits and e) RCP NPSH requirements, if ap pl ic ab le , j 1
Subcooling will exist in the. hot and cold legs of both loops. i
- 2. The "long term" trend of reactor coolant pressure and tempe r a tur e ;
is constant or slowly decreasing with time. "Short-term" l l
fl uc tua t ions of temperature and pres sur e are small and can be' j i
attributed to periodic operations of other equipment. (pressurizer l l
heat ers , spray, or feedwater),
i
- 3. Pressurizer level is within the indicated range. !
l
- 4. If fo rc ed circulation exists (RC pumps on) then reactor coolant T ave is abou t equal to the saturation temperature of the water in l
the steam generator (or generators) that is removing the heat. l l
I
)
t i l
I i
l DATii:
LO-8-82 167'
BWNP-20007 (6-76)
)
' BABCOCK & WILCOX . Numee l
Nuctenpowea ceNee4now omsios e s TECliNICAL DOCUMEPT 74-1127469-00 l
- 5. If natural circulation exists, Tc old will be about equal to the saturation t em pe r a t ure of the water in the steam generator (or i
generators) that is removing the heat. The dif ference between l incore th e rmo c ou pl e s and h T ot in the operating loop (or loops) will l track within 10F. ]
I
- 6. Steam generator level will be at the correct se tpoint (either i natural or forced circulation setpoint) and will be steady. )
l
- 7. Steam gene ra to r pressure is s t e ad y and is below the safety valve l l opening setpoint.
l l
- 8. The core is at least 1% A k/k sube ritic al on rods and boron. If I
\
more than one rod did not fully insert the core is at 1% ;
7-l l \ A k/k subcritical on boron alone, i
l
/
l 9. If the transient caused water to enter the reactor building and the reactor building env iror. men t was increased, it will now be l l
reduced to near normal levels. Pressure will be close to j atmos pheric pressure; average re ac to r building temperature will be i
near prior operating temperature; relative humidity will be about ;
l l 100%. i l
l 10. If radioactive water leaks oc cu rr ed in auxiliary buildings those l
areas will be sealed and the spillage either trapped or drained to s to rage t ank s .
l l'
1 .
DATE: 1 0- 8-82 PAGE 168
F . 1 1
. BWNP-20007 (6-76) ;
BABCOCK & WILCOX say o
- suct:Aa ROWER GENDAfiON DM51CN TECHNICAL DOCUMENT' 74-1127469-00 l l
l l
- 11. The component- failure (or f ailures) which caused the transient is l l
known. It has been bypassed, isolated,- repaired, or otherwise handled so that it no longer compromises plant safety, t
- 12. Components which suppo rt plant s afe ty are operatire, within their l
design limits (examples: pumps are operating away from the minimum l I
shutoff flow and have adequate NPSH, throt tl e valves are near the ]
. J proper o pening , electric motors are in the norma'l service range, .
elec t ro nic equipment is environmentally protected). If a component is operating off design and future f ailure is possible, then I i
redundant or alt ernate . equipment is on standby and ready to replace !
the equipment which might fail.
N l a , ;'
- 13. Stored water (condensate storage tank, BWSTI is adequate for long i term use or alternates are readily available.
14 Ins trume nt at ion to moni tor plant performance is operating l
- correctly. Potential failures of c rit ic al instrumentation have l been identified and alternate instrumentation is available.
Case II - LOCA's which cannot be isolated l
NOTE: With the exception of steam generator tube leaks, all reactor coolant I l
1eaks outside the reactor b uild.ing can be isolated, Although a l tube le ak is " ins id e" the reac te r building a direct path ou t s id e l the reactor building exists through the steam lines.
N
]
DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE 169-i l
I
~
, BWNP-20007 (6-76) l BABCOCK & WILCOX NUcLIAR POWER GENEAAllON OlVISION NUM8tR l
^
TECHNICAL. DOCUMENT 74-1127469-00 Many of the criteria of Case I apply to this part except that the reactor coolant will not always regain the subcooled margin and operating condit ions that depend on subcooling will not apply. The very smallest reactor coolant leaks may allow the reactor coolant system to repressurize <
l (because of continued High Pressure Injection) .and some amount- of e s ub cooling may be regained, but it is not likely that the subc ooling ;
margin will be restored. Consequently, the criteria ' for LOCA stability l does not include the subcooling margin. Also because subcooling may not exist the hot legs may have steam binding and natural circulation may not l i
exist; therefore, the criteria do not include natural circulation [
requirements (however, it can exist for very small breaks and should be f
/ ^
. checked). A re ac t o r-s t e am generator heat trans fer balance cannot usually j
/ !
be accomplished because of saturated (or near saturated) conditions which j may not oermit the reactor coolant to move the heat from the core to the steam generacor, but some heat trans fer to the steam generator is pos s ible 1
fo r small b re ak s . The steam generator operating level should be at the 95% level for small breaks to permit condensation of primary side steam.
Pressurizer level cannot be relied upon if saturation exists.
The most impo rt ant criterion for LOCA is to keep the core covered. This condition is confirmed by readings of the incore thermocouple and the hot leg RTD 's; both should show that the reactor coolant is s a tur a t ed (or even subcooled) but not su pe rhe a t ed .
DATE: 1 0-8-82 PAGE 170
, .o BWNP-20007 (6-76)
BABCOCK & WILCOX' Nuxsen NUCLEAR Powit GENERAtlON DIVIS:ON 'N 74-1127469-00 TECHNICAL. DOCUMENT ,
The continued loss of coolant . from a LOCA will not permit the . transient to be truly terminated , .but the leak rate can be ' minimized . Lowering RCS pressure is the best 'way .to lower the leak rate. This can be done by' loss l
through the le ak , by opening the EMOV, or by lowering ~ secondary side
.s ,
pressure. Long term loss of coolant when the RCS is depressurized occurs in two ways: 1) steaming out of the leak because of continued boiling ,
and 2) water loss' bec ause the nead of water is above the b reak and water l l will "run" out- of it. The rate of leakage m depend on the system pressure, the decay heat level (which causes bo ili.n;;) , and the elevation 1
of the le ak (a leak high in the system will have a lower flow rate than a leak low in the system). The leak rate will also depend on the hole size.
l
~--/ i1 The criteria for stability is that the leak rate is as low as possible and )
i that the flow into the core keeps it covered. It may take a very long j I time to recove r from some LOCA's and during that time there will be two 1
general stages shen the leak rate diminishes. The first s tage 'is when the reactor coolant system is depr es sur ized to the t e ac t o r building pr es s ur e ]
I (big breaks will depressurize rapidly, smaller breaks will take longer); q the second s t ag e is when the core heat drops so th a t it cannot boil the )
I water in the reactor vessel. Steaming will stop at that time (which may be
{
as long as several months after the transient). .Until the water in the !
l vessel becomes s ub c o oled (incore thermocouple r e ad less than 212F), the !
plant must be o pe r a t ed by injecting reactor building sump water in the ')
recirculation mode or by continuing to inj ec t fresh borated water from
.):
1 i
\
i DATE: PAGE 10-8-82 171 , j j
,. .. 1 BWNP-20007 (6-76).
BABCOCK & WILCOX nomen NUCLEAA POWER otNERAiloN DIYl5!ON
.m TECilNICAl. DOCUMENT 74-1127469-00 other sources. When the vessel water becomes subcooled the operator has !
the option to trans fer one train . of LPI to the decay heat removal mode and i keeping the other train on sump recirculation. The reason one train is I
left on recirculation is th a t it will keep water above the hot leg suction l for decay heat removal. Decay heat removal has the advantage of rapid RCS cooldown, but it must be carefully monitored to make sure the decay heat pump does not lose suction (or it will fail), and to make sure the decay I
heat pump does not run at shut-o f f head ,
i Because the leak may continue a long time until the decay heat system is placed in se rv ice , an arbitrary definition of s t ability is given. The following criteria define post-LOCA long term stability:
/ 1. The core is covered. Incore thermocouple readings show saturated or subcooled reactor coolant.
- 2. ECCS inj ec t ion is in the "long term cooling" mode. Long term cooling exists when the ECCS is operating with recirculation from the reactor building emergency sump. (NOTE: A decision may have been made not to transfer but to bring in backup water to refill th e BWST. Nevertheless, if recirculation could have been started , "long term cooling" is considered to have started).
- 3. The reactor coolant system is depressurized to near atmospheric !
l pressure so that the leak rate is as low as po s s i'o le . The LPI f system is used to cool th e core. (NOTE: If the break size did !
l 1
l 1
i DATE: 10-8-82 PAGE
e' ' '
BWNP-20C W (6-76) .
s- ,
BABCOCK-& WILCOX NUM8(R s
NUCllAR POWER oENERAflON olVl$ ION TECMilC Al.' DOCUMENT ~ 74-1127469-00 not permit depressurization before .the BWST was empty, and'HPI
" pig gyb ack" recirculation had to be .used while further depressurization took place the plant is not- considered to be l stable until the pressure 'and leak rate are as low as possible).
~^
- 4. Steam generator level is at 9'5% on the ' operate range and is s t e ad y .
l l
- 5. Reactor coolant pumps are off (operation of RC pumps could move 1
water past the break and increase the leak rate).
- 6. The following criteria from the previous part also apply:
Numbers 7, d, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14
- 7. For the special case of steam generator tube leaks (LOCA's):
- I a) Fe ed wa t er (main and auxiliary) . has been s topped to the I bad generator. ."'
b) Steau created by boiling the RCS leakage is directed to the condenser (if it is operating). i l
c) The plant is on decay heat ' removal. or standby backup borated water sources are available to replenish BWST inventory, l
l l
l
)
DATE: PAGE 10-8-82 .
-..__---a. . - - ~ _ _ _ - - - - - - m---