ML20235T607

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Notifies That Util Not in Compliance W/Regulation Re Min Amount of Insurance That Must Be Maintained by Util Operating Nuclear Plant.Relief Requested from 10CFR50.54(w) on 871002.Util Maintains $585 Million of Property Insurance
ML20235T607
Person / Time
Site: Fort Calhoun Omaha Public Power District icon.png
Issue date: 10/05/1987
From: Andrews R
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM)
References
LIC-87-672, TAC-66352, NUDOCS 8710130146
Download: ML20235T607 (1)


Text

_______.___,.._._m.

J.,..... _.

Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha Nebraska 68102 402/536 4000 e

October 5, 1987 LIC-87-672 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission l

Attn: Document Control Desk l

Washington, DC 20555 I

References:

1.

Docket No. 50-285 2.

10 CFR 50.54(w) 3.

Request for Exemption from 10 CFR 50.54(w), filed with the Commission on 10/2/87, by LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae on behalf of OPPD Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

Final Rule,10 CFR 50.54(w), Changes in Property Insurance Requirements for Licensed Nuclear Power Plants 52FR28963, August 5, 1987 A final rule amending 10 CFR 50.54(w) was published in the Federal Register e

dated August 5, 1987, which affects the minimum amount of insurance coverage that must be maintained by utilities operating licensed nuclear power plants. -

The Omaha Public Power District (0 PPD) wishes to notify you that we are not presently in compliance with this regulation.

Request for relief from the schedular requirements of 10 CFR 50.54(w) was filed with the Commission on Friday, October 2, 1987 by OPPD's legal representative, LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leibj &

MacRae.

At present, OPPD maintains $585 Million of property insurance obtained through American Nuclear Insurers and the Mutual Atomic Energy Reinsurance Pool.

As was detailed in Reference 3, the Nebraska Constitution and the Nebraska Supreme Court currently prevents OPPD from purchasing insurance from Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL).

OPPD has asserted, and the Commiss4on has found, (52 Federal Register 28966), that they are unable to provide equivalent protec-tion in lieu of purchasing the NEIL coverage necessary for OPPD to be.in compliance.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact us.

Sincerely, 9 9< M y R. L. Andrews k 0710130146 s71005 Division Manager PDR ADOCK 05000285 Nuclear Production J

PDR RLA/me cc: LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae R. D. Martin, NRC Regional Administrator gD{

A. Bournia, NRC Project Manager P. H. Harrell, NRC Seniogegi,dgnt Igectgr Male!remale

_ _ _ _. _