ML20235M077

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of Informing NRC of Steps Taken to Correct Violations Noted in Insp Repts 50-424/87-32 & 50-425/87-23.Severity Level for Violations 1 & 2 Reduced to Severity Level V.Violation 3 Withdrawn
ML20235M077
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  
Issue date: 09/29/1987
From: Grace J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To: James O'Reilly
GEORGIA POWER CO.
References
NUDOCS 8710060060
Download: ML20235M077 (3)


See also: IR 05000424/1987032

Text

_

_-

- - - _

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Q&ja}

m

-

SEP 2 91987

Georgia Power Company

ATTN: Mr. James P. O'Reilly

Senior Vice President-

Nuclear Operations

P. O. Box 4545

Atlanta, GA 30302

Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

NRC INSPECTION REPORT N05. 50-424/87-32 AND 50-425/87-23

Tnank you for your response of July 23, 1987, to our Notice of Violation issued

on July 18, 1987, concerning activities conducted at your Vogtle facility. We

have evaluated your response and found that it meets the requirements of

10 CFR 2.201.

We will examine the implementation of your corrective actions

during future inspections

Pursuant to your request that the Severity Level for Violations 1 and 2 be

,

reduced from Severity Level IV to severity Level V, a careful review was made

of your submittal and the facts surrounding each violation. Although there was

"

a prompt classification of the security aspects of the event, the violation was

based on the failure to classify the event in accordance with the emergency

plan. The failure to classify the event and resultant delay in notification of

State and local government agencies is a matter of more than minor safety and

environmental significance.

Thus the classification of the violation at

Severity Level IV is appropriate.

With regard to Violation 2, involving training, your response stated that the

results of your evaluation of the finding concluded that four of the five

individuals initially identified as not having been trained, in fact had been

trained although records available to the inspector at the time of the

inspection showed five individuals had not been trained.

In light of the fact

that you have determined' that only one individual had not received the

specialized emergency response training, we conclude that this is an isolated

example of failure to provide training.

Accordingly, the Severity Level for

this violation has been reduced to a Severity Level V.

Regarding Violation 3, we agree with your comments for example 2 initiating

conditions, "most of all alarms (annunciators) or indicators lost." This item

will be withdrawn as a violation.

Example 1, involving the loss of all

onsite and offsite AC power or a loss of all vital DC power, is based on an

inconsistency between the Emergency Plan and the implementing procedure.

We

3

understand from a telephone conversation between a member of the Region 11

i

staff and the Corporate Emergency Preparedness Supervisor, that actions are

being taken to bring about consistency between the Einergency Plan EALs and EALs

found in the emergency classification and implementing instructions.

It is

important to keep in mind that one of the major needs for consistency in plans

.and procedures is that the operating utility, NRC, State / local, and any

8710060060 870929

DR

ADOCK 050

4

)

' *

-

-

_ _ _

._

-

~.

Georgia Power Company

2

other response agencies who may use those plans and procedures in times of

emergency are not confused by inconsistencies.

We agree with the

appropriateness of the action being taken.

If your position is different on

this matter and actions are not being taken to bring about consistency between

the Emergency Plan and classification procedures, please notify this office

immediately. Based on the new information (provided in your response and phone

conversation with the Region 11 staff), this item will be rescinded from the

records as a violation and considered an inspector followup item.

We will

examine the implementation during future inspections.

We appreciate your cooperation in this matter.

Sincerely,

1

l

J. Nelson Grace

Regional Administrator

cc:

P. D. Rice, Vice President,

Project Director

C. W. Hayes, Vogtle Quality

Assurance Manager

G. Bockhold, Jr., General Manager,

Nuclear Operations

L. Gucwa, Manager, Nuclear Safety

and Licensing

J. A. Bailey, Project Licensing

Manager

B. W. Churchill, Esq., Shaw,

Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge

J. E. Joiner, Troutman, Sanders,

Lockerman and Ashmore

D. Kirkland, III, Counsel,

Office of the Consumer's Utility

Council

D. Feig, Georgians Against

Nuclear Energy

M. B. Margulies Esq. , Chairman,

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

Panel

Dr. O. H. Paris, Administrative Judge

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

Panel

G. A. Linenberger, Jr., Administrative Judge

Atomic Safety and Licensing Board

Panel

bcc:

(See page 3)

____

_ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

_ _ _

-

-.

I

Georgia Power Company

3

bec: E. Reis, OGC

i

le,

I

1

si"::!da"*J:P8:!r

I

State of Georgia

j

i

.

/

7 7

.e

7

/

7

87