ML20235H434
| ML20235H434 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 09/24/1987 |
| From: | Hind J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | Sylvia B DETROIT EDISON CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20235H438 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8710010051 | |
| Download: ML20235H434 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000341/1987029
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:_ h& . . SEP 241987 l l l Docket No. 50-341 l @ The Detroit Edison Company s 1 ATTN: B. Ralph Sylvia p$ ! Group Vice President S 6 , i Nuclear Operations $Q >! ) . 6400 North Dixie Highway i
- &
l Newport, MI 48166 > Q ,? ! Gentlemen: 1 I Q This refers to the routine safety inspection conducted by Mr. H. Peterson and others of this office on August 17-20, 1987, of activities at the Fermi Atomic Power Plant, Unit 2, authorized by NRC Operating License No. NPF-43 and to the discussion of our findings with Messrs. F. Agosti and W. Orser and othe s of your staff at the conclusion of the inspection. The enclosed copy of our inspection report identifies areas examined during the inspection. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of a selective examination of procedures and representative records, observations, and interviews with personnel. No violations of NRC requirements were identified during the course of this inspection. However, four weaknesses were identified during this inspection which will require corrective actions. These weaknesses are identified in the Appendix to this letter. As required by 10 CFR 50, Appendix E (IV.F), any weaknesses that are identified must be corrected. Accordingly, you are requested to submit a written statement within 30 days of the date of this letter describing your planned actions for correcting the weaknesses identified in the Appendix. In addition to the above, following your review of the enclosed report, we would like to meet with you and discuss your corrective actions, including l repeating the Assembly / Accountability and Medical Drills. In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, a copy of this letter, the enclosures, and your response to this letter will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room. / /,V jJ 1\\ { , Wo28RBW@ G _ _ _ - - _
, - - - _ - - - - - , . _. -.. - , .i ,. 'Th Detroit Edison Company 2, g We_will gladly discuss'any questions you have,concerning this inspection. t Sincerely, 'lYh,Iftu ck A. Hin , Director- 61 vision of Radiation Safety and Safeguards- Enclosures: 1. Appendix, Exercise Weaknesses .2. Inspection Report l No'. 50-341/87029(DRSS) ' ' cc w/ enclosures: ' S. R. Frost, Licensing P. A. Marquardt, Corporate Legal Department , DCD/DCB'(RIDS) , Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Ronald Callen, Michigan Public Service Commission Harry H..Voight, Esq. ' Michigan' Department'of, Public Health Monroe County Office-of Civil Preparedness D. Matthews,~ EPB, NRR -W. Weaver, FEMA, RV- h %)\\ 4 ) ! l ? @i R RII RII RII: g bell Green an (h,y Pe erson/ims Foster [[ J/n/s7 qlz3l11 ' ja - _ _ - _
-__- -_ _ ._ - . _ - . ' l -.1 -,: I
. .! APPENDIX 1 EXERCISE WEAKNESSES 4 I
- 1.'
=Information. flow to the TSC from the. Control Room was untimely. ~For j example, the.TSC was informed of.the'High Pressure Coolant Injection (HPCI) system initiation and subsequent fuel failure approximately one -hour after-the fact; the TSC was not aware that one'of'.the Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC)' steam isolation valves indicated an intermediate l valve position until approximately two hours after.the condition existed. l (Item No. 341/87029-01) (Section Sa) 2. The licensee failed to adequately demonstrate Assembly and Accountability. l Assembly and Accountability was' declared completed within 30 minutes, . but over 70 people were not properly accounted for. No adeqtiate actions j were taken to find those missing before. Assembly and Accountability ./ activities were terminated. (Item No'. 341/87029-03) (Section 5b) l ! 3. The Post-Accident Sampling System (PASS) procedure had incorporated- ! unapproved changes. The practice in utilizing informally revised l procedures without prior formal review and ' approval is unsatisfactory. 3 (Item No.' 341/87029-07) (Section 5d) t . 4. The licensee failed to adequately demonstrate a Medical Drill. Onsite , response by licensee personnel was slow. Inadequate. contamination control. support was.provided by licensee personnel to ambulance and medical staffs. (Item No. 341/87029-09) (Section Se) j l l n ( ) i ____ - - - _ - _ _ - - - - _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _-- - - - }}