ML20216H462
| ML20216H462 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 04/16/1998 |
| From: | Belisle G NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Richard Anderson FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9804210142 | |
| Download: ML20216H462 (49) | |
Text
.
- e April 16, 1998
. Florida Power Corporation Crystal. River Energy Complex Mr. Roy A. Anderson (SA2A)
Sr. VP. Nuclear Operations ATTN: Mgr... Nuclear Licensing -
15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River FL 34428-6708
SUBJECT:
MEETING
SUMMARY
- CRYSTAL RIVER 3 CLOSURE INFORMATION FOR THE SECURITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN - DOCKET NO. 50-302
Dear Mr. Anderson:
This refers to the open management meeting that was conducted at Mr. F. Marcussen's request in the Region II office on April 8.1998, to discuss closure information for the Crystal River 3 Security Improvement Plan.
Enclosed are a list of attendees and a copy of your presentation handouts.
In accordance kith Section 2.790(a) of the NRC's " Rules of Practice.~ Part 2.
Title 10. Code of Federal Regulations. a copy of this letter and its enclosures will be placed in the NRC Public Document Room.
Should you have any questions concerning this meeting, please contact me at
- (404) 562-4621.
Sincerely.
ORIGINAL SIGED BY GDoE E BELISLE-George A. Belisle Chief Special Inspection Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket No. 50-302 License No. DPR-72 l
Enclosures:
- 1. List of Attendees
- 2. Handout - Security Improvement Plan
- 3. Handout - Security Improvement Plan Closure Information f
cc w/encls:
. John P. Cowan. Vice President v Nuclear Production (NA2E).
Florida Power Corporation l Crystai River Energy Complex i 15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River. FL 34428-6708 (cc w/encls cont'd - See page 2) 9804210142 990416 i
///
PDR ADOCK 05000302 !
i
_F. PDR -
SCd3
FPC 2 (cc w/encls cont'd)
Charles G. Pardee. Director Nuclear Plant Operations (NA2C)
Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Energy Complex 15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River. FL 34428-6708
- 8. J. Hickle Director. Restart (NA2C)
Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Energy Complex 15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River. FL 34428-6708 Robert E. Grazio. Director Nuclear Regulatory Affairs (SA2A)
Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Energy Complex 15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River. FL 34428-6708 James S. Baumstark. Director Quality Programs (SA2C)
Florida Power Corporation Crystal River Energy Complex 15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River. FL 34428-6708 R. Alexander Glenn Corporate Counsel Florida Power Corporation MAC - A5A P. O. Box 14042 St. Petersburg, FL 33733-4042 Attorney General
, Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee. FL 32304 Bill Passetti Office of Radiation Control
.De)artment of Health and i Rehabilitative Services l 1317 Winewood Boulevard i
Tallahassee. FL 32399-0700 (cc w/encls cont'd - See page 3)
I
I FPC 3 (cc w/encls cont'd)
Joe Myers Director Division of Emergency Preparedness Department of Community Affairs
- 2740 Ceriterview Drive
! Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Chairman Board of County Commissioners Citrus County 110 N. Apopka Avenue Inverness. FL 36250 Robert B. Borsum Framatome Technologies l 1700 Rockville Pike Suite 525 -
Rockville, MD 20852-1631 Distribution w/encls:
L. Wiens, NRR S. Ninh. RII P. Steiner, RII PUBLIC NRC Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
- 6745 N. Tallahassee Road Crystal River. FL 34428 FFICE QDR$ / RII DRP RII s))R$[ l SIGNATURE dho/g [h[fy yd(
NAME fS'TR1TTQN RSCHIN GB M[5LE ^
DATE 4% fl/) /98 4/ /98 4/ l h /98 4/ /98 4/ /98 4/ /98 4/ /98 g ( 4ES ) NO YES NO YES NO YES NO I YES NO YES NO YES NO OFFkCIAd RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME: St\DRS\ SIB \CRYMESU.LS l
)
l
l '
! LIST OF ATTENDEES l
l l Nuclear Reculatory Commission l
l J. Jaudon. Director. Division of Reactor Safety (DRS) l G. Belisle Chief. S)ecial Inspection Branch DRS T. Johnson Acting Clief. Reactor Projects Branch 3. Division of Reactor Projects L. Stratton. Safeguards Inspector. DRS Florida Power Corocration M. Marano. Director. Nuclear Site and Business Support F. Marcussen. Manager. Nuclear Security l
! )
i l
l 1
1
)
Enclosure 1
. .- ,. ' y ,y.
f
. N FLORIDA POWER
- . CORPORATION
~
[; CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3-
- T 2
security
. Improvement zw,n,
- r. _ _ _
. 'T an .
l l
4 JULY 25,1997 4
A s
O FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION 1
CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 SECURITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN l
l JULY 25,1997 i
O 1 l i
l l
i
\ C- --
F.E.\fiarcussen '
Manager Nuclear Security Department h ,_ h e (p -- -- - .
M.W. Narano (
Director Nuclear Site and Business Support t
I i
i ..
~
l FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION O CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 l
! SECURITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN Foreword:
Crystal River Unit 3's recent history of regulatory issues and the results of analyses by both our own and outside resources clearly indicate the need for an aggressive and broad-based action program for the overall strengthening of our nuclear security program.
During the past several months, CR-3 has taken a number of actions to begin improvement of its program: replacement of the incumbent Director of Nuclear Site and Business Support and Manager Nuclear Security with individuals having extensive experience in nuclear security program i management; inclusion of Nuclear Security in the Plant's Corrective Action Process; and two peer assessments.
l l Assessments by the new management team and the peer assessment groups j s identified a number of weaknesses in the effectiveness and l 1mplementation of the physical security program and provided l recommendations for improvement. Additionally, data obtained by l inclusion of Security in CR-3's Corrective Action Process and the results of Quality Assurance audits supported management and peer assessment recommendations and identified additional areas of the physical security program that required corrective action.
l At the Pre-Decisional Enforcement Conference held with NRC Region II on May 22, 1997, CR-3 management committed to develop a comprehensive l Security Improvement Plan (SIP) that would serve as a vehicle to achieve 1 l and maintain superior compliance with regulatory requi rements . The pl an , detailed in the following pages, meets that commitment and reflects the determination of CR-3's management to again have an i exemplary nuclear security program. The development of the SIP was ;
based upon lessons learned as a result of regulatory findings; experience of the new management team; recommendations made by peer assessment groups; and program weaknesses identified by the Corrective Action and Quality Assurance programs. The SIP will be implemented by CR-3's Nuclear Security Department with the support and oversight of FPC management. The status and results of Plan activities will be available for review by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
l Page 1 l
/
'4-
=
Purpose & Scope:
A_
U The Securiry Improvement . Plan delineates a program for the overall:
strengthening of physical security at CR-3, with the goal of achieving and maintaining verbatim compliance with the applicable security
' requirements of 10 CFR, Part 50. Three major attributes contributing to the total security program improvement are addressed in .the plan:
people, the. individuals who implement the program; equipment, the tools needed to do the job; and, processes, which structure and direct security program activi ties . Objectives, to be achieved in strengthening. each attribute, are identified. Some objectives may' be j accomplished quickly while others will require a long-term or ongoing effort. For each objective, a number of " tasks" representing action items leading to the objective, are identified and a projected. date for completion given. A brief descriptive comment is provided for each task.
The SIP identifies initial improvement actions only, and is not intended to be definitive. Other objectives will have to be achieved and additional tasks completed before excellence can be reached in each security program attribute. The' plan does, however, delineate an initial action program that represents CR-3 management's thrust and strategy for overall nuclear security program improvement.
Method of Approach:
O The implementation of the Security Improvement Plan will have a decided l
impact on nuclear security force activities -and the accustomed ways of j
implementing the security program. Attitudes, operational methods, equipment and, possibly, personnel assignments will requi re change.
Except where immediate action must be taken to preclude non-compliance, changes will be systematically phased-in over a period of time. This approach is necessary to maintain continuity and effectiveness in day- ,
to-day security operations and to ensure regulatory compliance. While !
l addressing program weaknesses, care will be taken to preserve and build upon existing strengths. In addition to the efforts of CR-3's 4 management and supervisory staff, assistance in the improvement effort '
will be provided by CR-3's Corrective Action Review Board (governing l body of the Corrective Action Process), Quality Assurance, and Nuclear l Training departments. Outside resources will also be used to evaluate
. progress and provide assistance. These resources will include help from the Cooperative Management Audit Program, a follow-up peer assessment planned during December, and'an NRC Regional Assist visit, scheduled for early August of this year, i
O l- Page 2 l
I O ^11araure: reorte OBJECTIVES:
l
- 1. Restructure the Nuclear Security Department to Include the Replacement and/or Reassignment of Management, Supervisory, and Support Personnel .
Tasks:
1-1 Assion New Director: In May 1997, overall responsibility for the Nuclear Security Program was assigned to Mr. Mark Marano, newly appointed Director Nuclear Site and Business Support.
Mr. Marano recently worked in management with PSE&G in support of the Salem Plant recovery effort and was previously j with ' Carolina Power & Light where he had several management responsibilities including oversight of the nuclear security program. As Director, Mr. Marano reports to the Vice L
President Nuclear Production, and is empowered to establish l policies in the area of security and to ensure that the i
Nuclear Security Department has the resources and training needed to fulfill its mission, t
To Start By: N/A Complete By: Completed l
1-2 Appoint A New Nuclear Security Department Manaaer: Mr. Fred E. Marcussen was appointed as Manager Nuclear Security and joined the CR-3 staff in June 1997. Mr. Marcussen was previously Manager of Security at Turkey Point Nuclear Power Pl ant. He brings to CR-3 over sixteen years of experience covering all aspects of nuclear security. Mr. Marcussen has a demonstrated record of success in security program development, implementation, and management. As indicated by the July 1997 Nuclear Quality Assessments audit, the recent management changes in the Security area have had a positive impact and increased management focus on improving the effectiveness of the security organization.
l To Start By: N/A l Complete By: Completed
>O l Page 3 l l
m.
t l
1-3 Establish and Fill a New FPC Nuclear Security Deoartment Y Position To Assume Resoonsibility for the Security System and Sub-systems and to Supervise Alarm Station Ooerations: A position of Nuclear Security Systems Coordinator has been
, established and was filled by Mr. Ron Hess in July. For sixteen years Mr. Hess was responsible for the installation, daily operation and testing of the security system and subsystems at the Turkey Point Nuclear Plant where he also supervised alarm station operations. Ron has a thorough, hands-on knowledge of security electronics and thei r l application in the security operational program,
,. To Start By: N/A l Complete By: Completed ;
l L 1-4 Establish and Fill a New FPC Nuclear Security Deoartment l
Position To Supervise the Access Control and Reaulatorv
- Comoliance Proarams
- The new position will consolidate, within -the Nuclear Security Department, the Access Authorization Program, formerly under Nuclear Operations, and
, the Security Department's site badging operations. The supervisor will also oversee and coordinate all aspects of the nuclear security program to ensure compliance with CR-3's security commitments and regulatory compliance. Mr. David O Watson, who has. had previous experience in Access Control, has been appointed to the position.
To Start By: N/A Complete By: Completed 1-5 Develoo A New Oraanizational Structure For the Nuclear Security Department and Assian Personnel to Identified Supervisory and Admini strative Positions: A new organizational structure has been established and personnel l assigned to identified positions. The intent of the new I structure is to strengthen departmental management control by l identifying tasks, assigning responsibilities, and establishing channels for command and reporting. A chart depicting the new departmental organization is presented as ;
Attachment One. As positions and personnel assignments may l change during the Security Improvement Program, the l t organizational chart should be considered as " temporary."
I To Start By: N/A Complete By: Completed (Temporary) l Page 4 l
i l .
I 7
- 2. Improve Security Force Performance.
l Tasks:
l 2-1 Establish and Fill a FPC Staff Security Ooerations Suoervisor l Position: The primary duties of the supervisor will include:
ensuring regulatory compliance in day-to-day security force operations; . coordinating security operations with plant l operational activities; supervising operational activities of j the Security Shift Supervisors and ensuring continuity in
- shift-to-shift operations.
l To Start By: N/A Complete By: Completed
( 2-2 Reauire All Members of the Security Force to Wear Uniforms:
l This has been done as a part of an overall effort to improve esprit de corps. Shift Supervisors and Alarm Station Operators are now in uniform.
To Start By: N/A Complete By: Completed
-[
l V]
i 2-3 Chance Security Officer Work Schedule: The current schedule requires weekly rotation between day and night shifts, limits time available for training and includes extended time-off periods wherein officers can not be kept abreast of current activities. A new schedule is being implemented which will
, correct these. problems and _ improve work performance.
l-l To Start By: Preliminary action underway i Complete By: Target - ,
Sept. 30, 1997 l 2-4 Evaluate Security Officer Staffina. Duties. And Post l Assianments: Although evaluated on a near daily basis, a formal study will be made following the current plant outage to ensure an appropriate level of staffing to meet normal operational and contingency needs. ;
I 1.
)
l To Start By: In progress l Complete By: Jan. 31, 1998 ,
l O l V
Page 5 l ;
2-5 Implement Improved Continaency Response Drills: Improved
/3 drills will focus on plant protection strategies and are V designed to improve security force skills and teamwork.
To Start By: In progress Complete By: On going 2-6 As Necessarv. Retrain and Reaualifv Security rorce Personnel Followina Security Plan and Procedure Chanaes: The FPC Training Department is responsible for Security Officer training, qualification, and requalification. Although its support has been excellent in the past, additional resources will be required to meet increased training and requalification needs resulting from security program 1 changes.
To Start By: Preliminary action underway Complete By: On going
- 3. Strengthen Alarm Station Operations i
f- Tasks: )
3-1 Increase Suoervision of Alarm Station Operations: The supervision will be provided by the newly established Nuclear i Security Systems Coordinator position and will stress proper use of alarm station resources and consistency in operator performance.
To Start By: Initial action underway Complete By: On going 3-2 Imorove Alarm Station Operator Skills: This will involve increasing operator understanding of the security system, retraining, and implementing software enhancements to improve equipment / operator interaction. The changes are essential to improving command and control of security shift activities.
To Start By: Initial action
- underway l Complete By: On going ;
~~'
(V l
l Page 6 l l
O ^11araore: eaurescur OBJECTIVES:
- 1. Evaluate the Security System and System Operations. Identify and Correct Deficiencies Found.
Tasks:
1-1 Conduct Test To Evaluate the Perimeter Surveillance (CCTV)
System: The evaluation will verify day and night visual coverage of the perimeter, quality of alarm station monitor display and proper camera display in response to Perimeter Intrusion Detection System Alarms. This test will be structured to detect vulnerabilities and will be more rigorous than routine, "Seven-day" tests. Action will be taken to correct any deficiencies found.
To Start By: July 28.1997 Complete By: July 31,1997 1-2 Conduct Tests to Evaluate the Perimeter Intrusion Detection
_Sn lem: Each perimeter alarm zone will be subjected to stringent penetration testing and a detection probability of at least 90% with a 95% level of. confidence confirmed. This test will be structured to detect vulnerabilities and will be more rigorous than routine, "Seven-day" tests. Action will be taken to correct any deficiencies found.
To Start By:- N/A Complete By: Completed- 7/17/97 1
l l
Page 7 l ;
l
1-3 Test and Evaluate Security System Back-up Power Supolies:
Tests 'will be conducted to evaluate the ability of back-up power supplies (UPS and Diesel) to support, without interruption, security systems in the event of normal power loss. Testing will be done in conjunction with normal Plant restart activities. Action will be taken to correct any deficiencies found.
To Start By: Per Restart Schedule Complete By: During Restart Actions 1-4 Test and Evaluate Protected Area Liahting: A test, to be i conducted once every thi rty days, will be developed and implemented to evaluate security lighting levels within the l protected area and isolation zones.
l To Start By: N/A l Complete By: Task completed
- 2. Conclude the Security System Upgrade Project l
Tasks:
2.1 Resolve Security System Concerns With Vendor: During Factory and Site Acceptance testing, a number of software concerns I unrelated to alarm annunciation, were identified as "open
! items." CR-3 is working with the Vendor to "cl os e" the items.
To Start By: ~In progress l Complete By: August 31, 1997 I Comolete Vograde in the Area of the Nuclear Security Operations Center: The equipment is installed. Initial testing identified the need for an additional power supply.
jp To Start By:
Complete By:
In progress July 31,1997 (Based on successful testing) i O
l Page 8 l
2-3 Perform A Site Evaluation Test of Security Uoorade Proiect O Eauioment Performance: The . test will provide a technical
- evaluation of the new equipment's conformance to design criteria and the equipment's operational reliability. Action will be taken to correct any problems identified during testing.
To Start By: September 1, 1997
\ Complete By: 30 to 60 days from start
1 Complete Preliminarv Work Reaui red for Eauioment Installation: The work will include the design, engineering and, if needed, modification of equipment required to support the video-capture devices. UPS and video-switcher capacities may require change.
To Start By: In progress j Complete By: Jan. 31, 1998 3-2 Install. Test. and Place Video-Cacture Eauioment Into l Service: In addition to start-up testing, Security will j conduct extensive functional tests before use. Operators l will be trained on equipment use and procedures changed to l include the use of video-capture as a means of alarm assessment.
To Start By: Jan. 31, 1998 / l Complete By: Feb. 14, 1998 O l i
l Page 9 l
O ATTRIBUTE: PROCESSES OBJECTIVES:
- 1. Revise the Physical Security Plan and Security Procedures Tasks:
1-1 Revise the Physical Security Plan: The Physical Security Plan has been revised sixteen times during the past five years. Each revision has been partial, affecting one or moie Plan segments. As a result, the Plan has become disjointed, overly descriptive and, in some areas, vague. The following criteria are to be met in the revision:
o Restate commitments in a clear and concise manner o Eliminate redundancies o Eliminate unnecessary descriptive detail .
l o Revalidate information describing equipment performance )
l and emergency power supply f l o Pattern to NUREG 0908 '
To Start By: August 4, 1997 Complete By: Jan. 31, 1998 l
1-2 Make Immediate Chanaes to Existina Procedures as Needed to Imorove Security Force Performance: This is an interim measure that is in progress and will be continued until a new set of procedures or instructions can be developed. The revisions will include proceduralizing security force instructions now contained in Security Information Reports.
To Start By: In progress Complete By: Dec. 31, 1997 O
l Page 10 l l
1-3 Enable the IJse of Security Departmental Procedures or
(-
Instructions: At present security procedures are, by references in the FSAR and Tech. Specs. to Regulatory Guide 1.33, Quality Control documents. The revision, review, and approval process for procedural change is labor intensive and slow. A quicker way is needed to impart and change instructions to the security force.
To Start By: In progress Complete By: Dec. 31, 1997 1-4 Develop a New Set of Departmental Procedures or Instructions to Direct the Activities of the Security Organization: The condition of the Security Plan is, to a lesser degree, reflected in the security procedures. Both requi re significant change to provide a stronger basis for implementation of the security program. As the new procedures / instructions will require frequent modification to address program changes, the task will be considered to be complete when a majority of the new Departmental Procedures / Instructions have been developed and implemented.
To Start By: August 4. 1997 l rms Complete By: Jan. 31, 1998
(,)
- 2. Transfer Security Related Activities Now Performed by Other Departments to the Manager, Nuclear Security Department j l
Tasks:
2-1 Transfer Responsibility for the Access Control !
(Authorization) Pronram from the Trainina to the Nuclear _ I Security Department: The transfer is designed to make better use of resources and establish stronger controls by placing all access responsibilities under Nuclear Security Department leadership.
l To Start By: N/A Complete By: Completed O
Page 11 l
F l 2-2 Transfer Security Activities Now Included in the Procedures i
of Other Disciplines to the Nuclear Security Department:
\
Some security . tasks (example; performance testing of the perimeter intrusion detection system) are now proceduralized and performed by other departments. The change is needed to J l strengthen performance by placing all security operational activities under Nuclear Security Department leadership.
To Start By: July 8, 1997 Complete By: Dec. 31, 1997
- 3. Develop and Implement a Security Department Self-Evaluation Program l
Tasks:
3-1 Initiate a Security Deoartment Trackina and Trendino Proaram:
The program will supplement CR-3's Corrective Action Program and consist of a number of " Indicators" that will enable l Security to closely monitor program problem areas, including i the following:
l l o Loggable Events Attributable to Security Force Error o Total Loggable Events l N-s/
i fT o Unsecured Doors o Compensatory Hours Worked Due To Equipment Failure o Badges Lost On-site o Security Force Overtime o Security Force Staffing Level Compared To Authorized.
To Start By: In progress !
Complete By: On-going 3-2 Imolement Security Officer Assessments of the Security )
Proaram: The assessments will be performed with support by ,
l Quality Programs Department and security supervisory personnel and will be based on NRC inspection modules. In addition to program evaluation, the assessments are intended to increase Security Officer awareness of regulatory requi rements .
To Start By: In progress Complete By: On going i
O i l Page 12 l
1 I
l
- 4. Complete and Evaluate Actions for the Protection of Safeguards l Information Tasks:
4-1 Comolete the Destruction and/or Reclassification of Documents No Lonaer Determined to be Safeauards Information: Action to meet the planned completion date stated in the May 22, 1997 Pre-Decisional Enforcement Conference is in progress.
Aperture cards and microfilm remain a concern for on-time i completion.
gg',A l To Start By: In progress _
' Complete By: Sept., 30, 1997 4-2 Evaluate Corrective Actions Taken for the Protection of Safeguards Information: All Safeguards Information is now within repositories controlled by the Nuclear Security Department and procedural controls have been strengthened.
The effectiveness of the measures taken will be evaluated by the Corrective Action Review Board.
l To Start By: In progress l
Complete By: On going I
- 5. Implement Hand Geometry System for Routine Identification of Persons Authorized Unescorted Access to the Protected Area.
Task:
5.1 Receive NRC Acoroval of Physical Security Plan Changes.
! Complete Procedures. Inform CR-3_ Ponulation. and Imolement Identification Process.
To Start By: N/A j l
Complete: July 24, 1997 i
O l Page 13 l
,m Summary:
U Consistent with FPC's mission to achieve excellence in all CR-3 activities, management is committed to the implementation of the Security Improvement Plan. Some tasks have already been completed, and actions are in progress on a number of others. As more tasks are completed and objectives achieved within each Plan Attribute, we anticipate a quantifiable improvement in our overall nuclear security program. The skills, regulatory awareness, and the quality of security officer task performance will be improved. Our security systems will be enhanced, giving us better and more reliable equipment to work with.
Also, we will have in place the management team, organizational structure, and the Physical Security Plan / procedural foundation necessary to achieve and maintain excellence.
In addition to the activities identified in the Security Improvement Plan, other actions for the enhancement of the nuclear security program are now being considered by CR-3's Management. Under consideration are an upgrade of the security system's host computers, an expansion of the CCTV system, and the addition of a fence-mounted perimeter detection system to supplement our existing microwave detectors.
CR-3 will devote the resources and continued effort needed to achieve the verbatim compliance goal of the Security Improvement Pl an .
b] Nuclear Security Department has been tasked with the implementation of the plan and the timely completion of the plan's tasks and objectives.
The Progress will be closely monitored by FPC management.
n%J l Page 14 l
. j ATTACHMENT WO O
I J
CLOSURE DOCUMENTATION REQUESTS / TRACKING l
l l
o Each action item will be tracked to closure and statused, o Documentation supporting closure will be required.
o Tracking of closure will be the responsibility of Compliance Supervisor (D. Watson).
o Concurrence on closure will be given by Manager of Security (F. l
\
Marcussen).
i o Effective reviews will be conducted by Compliance Supervisor and followed up by Quality Assurance and our outside peer assessments.
i o All files will be maintained by Security.
l i
f
(%yr 1
E
,)._ O N
( T N r E e e ge )r M b tr a nt o H a a c C I C
r Mar t A t n e c r
T A Y lajC D ro(
P e o i
k T
I I ia s
w et s o r
c c jer a
)
t r
s oot R st s so s m
e r K .P A.
A r no C
(
U e yi I
HS ye v r I E. t ri up C
s R u cS ac k
r
)
S e r pL c oto K n a el s
r c
I Csa/ a r A.. t mt e o n S s u y uni c
t r
J sC S
y(
,C r r u a e c R
Mg e s aS t r
n n o l o t E. a l i f )
d p bet arr o i r r FM A
r p h oo a ut s p eis S c
_ h cSi mp v r y istv a r
aOe t r l
I nt a ir et H la eni B mp
. tr S c
e C y p J c
.t S. rui S u
S u p n c u o ESC (
D. a e l A p o T e S t r
n t o n C
D Ct a
I s e siss U s c
n r rlo e cA n
ol o i a r et n o r
c t
s p s t s ois A a mi v FoC vr N i Wo .
L. / S D in u C pe m
r
.ss p e H. e u GccS I
l y or r nt o nt d A imoa r n A l oCi D sd r
. s e o o
P. c Y AcC
,)
'\
x .
e 4
W SECURITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN CLOSURE INFORMATION
'1 e l
. I l
t ATTRIB ~TE: PEOPLE 1
I i
l l
\
l
=
Establish anc Fill a New FPC Xuclear Security Dept. Position to Assume Responsibility for !
the Security System & Sub- !
systems and to Supervise A arm l Station Operations.
i
- A aosition ofXuclear Security Systems Coorcinator nas aeen establisaec. and was il ed 3y Mr.
Ron Hess in Ju y. i i
e Restructure the Nuclear Security Department to Include the Replacement and/or Reassignment of Management, Supervisory, and Support Personnel.
Assign New Director
- In May 1997, overal:
resaonsibility -Por the Nuclear Security Program was assignec to Mr. Mar 1 Marano.
Appoint A New Xuclear Security Dept. Mgr.
- Mr. Frec E. Marcussen was appointed as Manager Xuc. ear Security anc joinec the CR-3 sta ~f in June 1997
~
Establish and Fill a New FPC Security Dept. Position to Supervise the Access Control &
Regulatory Compliance Programs
- Mr. David Watson, who .aas aac.
arevious exaerience in Access Contro_, has aeen anointec to t;ae Josition.
I
~
4 Develop a New Organizational Structure for the Nuclear Security Dept. & Assign Personnel to Identified Supervisory and administrative Positions
- A caart c.epicting the new de:aartmental organization is representec as Attacament One.
As :aositions and personnel assignments may caange during the Security Improvement Program, the organizational caart saou.c. ae consic erec as "temaorary."
l
Establish and Fill a FPC Staff Security !
Operations Supervisor Position Establis.1 and Fill a FPC Staff Security Operations Supervisor
- In March 1998, Mike Waite was :
appointec as Security Oaerations l Suaervisor.
Require A;1 Members of t:ae Security Force to Wear Uniforms
- This has aeen c one as aart 0: Pan overal; e:ifort to im 3 rove escrit de cor3s.
Change Security Officer Work Schedule
- The 0: Ficer schedule was changed on Marca 30,1998.
Evaluate Security Officer Staffing Duties, and Post Assignments
- Tais is 3eing evaluatec on a c aily 3 asis. Proposec scaedu e for 1998 - 76 0:fficers anc. 9 Sta:fing personnel.
Implement Improved Contingency Response Drills
- This is on going.
I i
4 As Xecessary, Retrain and Requalify Security Force Personnel Following Security Plan and Procedure Changes
- This is on going.
1
Strengthen Alarm Station Operations 1 Increase Supervision of Alarm Station Operations
- Tais is on going. l Improve Alarm Station Operator Skills
- Tais is on going. .
1 1
l l
e ATTRIBUTE:
EQUIPMENT
~
Evaluate the Security System and System !
Operations. Identify and l l Correct Deficiencies Found.
Conduct Test to Evaluate the l Perimeter Surveillance (CCTV)
System.
-T 1is was tested c uring the weer of August L,1997 waica resulted in comaensatory post.
- Vic eo caature will reso.ve tais issue.
L
, 4 l
i
4 l -
Conduct Tests to Evaluate the Perimeter Intrusion Detection System l - These tests were completec on
- Ju y,
- 7, : 997.
Test and Evaluate Security System Back-up Power Supplies
- This test was conducted a:ler restart.
Test and Evaluate Protected Area Lighting
- This testing is c.one on a mont: 11y 3 asis.
(
t
Conclude the Security System Upgrade Project Resolve Security System Concerns With Vendor
- A1: items were comaleted c.uring tae weer o:P August :. :., :.997.
Complete Upgrade in the Area of the Nuclear Security Operations Center
- Allitems were completec during tae weer o:PJu y 18, : 997 wit:1 t:ae release o:Pcomaensatory costs on tlat c ay.
1 Perform a Site Eva uation Test of Security Upgrade Project Equipment Performance
- Tais test was started on Octo aer
- 4,1997 anc.was coma etec on January 7, ~ 998.
. l Install a Video-Capture System in CAS and SAS Complete Preliminary Work Required for Equipment Installation !
- This worr has 3een comp. eted. !
Install, Test, anc Place Video- i Capture Equipment Into Service
- This is scaecu ed for comaletion on Aaril 8, : 998.
4 e
ATTRIBUTE:
PROCESSES I
\
Revise the Physical Security Plan and Security Procedures Revise the Physical Security Plan
- 7.0 Rev. O to the P 1ysical Security P an is in :~1nal review process.
Make Immediate Changes to Existing Procedures as Xeeded to Improve Security Force Per ~ormance
- A:.1 SS's anc security re..atec. AI's aave 3een t:aroug1t:ae SAG. This wil: enaale a more exaecitious met:1od for revising arocec.ures in the future.
Enable the Use of Security Departmental Procedures or Instructions l
- Security Procec ures .aave a. been i
through a safety assessment l review (50.59 per CP 213). This
.aas enablec t:1e deaartment to I uadate procec.ures on a more exaeditious manner in orc er to get the aroaer information to the field c uick:y.
l I
i Develop a New Set of Departmental Procedures or Instructions to Direct the Activities of the Security l Organization
! - Taere is no longer a neec. to l c. eve o 3 a set of c.e aartmenta.
3rocedures. All 3rocecures are l 50.59 reviewec. waica mares t:1e flow much easier anc. more exoeditious.
l l
l l
l
4 Transfer Security Related Activities Now Performed by Other ,
Department to the Manager, Nuclear Security Dept.
Transfer Responsibility for the Access Control (Authorization Program from the Training to the Nuclear Security Dept.
- Tais was comp eted c uring July 1997.
.- l
.. 1 Transfer Security Activities ;
Now Included in the Procedures of Other Disciplines to the !
Xuclear Security Dept. l
- SS-300 (Testing 0:f Security Equiament) training completec ay Marca 3 ~ ,1998.
I J
Develop and Implement a Security Dept. Self-Evaluation program Initiate a Security Department Tracking and Trending Program.
- This is on going done monthly.
Implement Security Officer Assessments of the Security Program.
- Tais is on going.
l 4
.: i Complete and Evaluate Actions for the Protection of Safeguards Information Complete :he Destruction and/or Reclassification of !
Documents No Longer Determined to be Safeguards Information
- Tais is on going.
Evaluate Corrective Actions taken :for the Protection of i Safeguards Information
- Tais is on going.
Implement Hand Geometry System for Routine Identification of Persons Authorized Unescorted Access to the Protected Area.
Receive XRC Approval of Physical Security Plan Changes, Complete Procecures, Inform CR-3 Popu.ation, anc.
Implement Ic.entification Process.
- This was com1eted on July 24, 1997.
e e
A C c .Y o
o se.cP r
dsD A i
nCr o I d
aonm A Si.mD t
ot r rloyni S u c c G. n p
es.
eH s u/L pe C.
A I
r vCo F r v
imaoW i cB io s s spl s t Ac. otnt r r e oio r a n s e J. or n s s l c
isR s I e
t Ce a
nnn on t tr e oy l
( S sum S
e c N CSe oucu np t erit ui.
py e
vpW r
t O.J D u r
avy ci t
ooh
)r r
sS r i r
ieh s
r r
o iati e i
peA Sra D p rt .
c l
t e el nB e
f t
o c n
s ina at n a
l si uh Sc t
p a MF a.
p r S
( y J Cs.
oe t S
e ScuR .
j od r
t Sa.
c nE egeM r a r
puri E u r S
t r
iNc n
r m t
sC.A ey .
r I t y uu a/a cL vSH cs el se t
oc op r ka r iy e s
ot ss r es a r n e s m s
c u
(
P r
Cj o o c.
nt eL
.D r i
t r
aMr C I t
caa o nb t
)r g e art y ee r
A t
t a
c h
PS r . m o
c e e .P n dG ua i
t 1
r gn e
si
Areas For Improvement Access Authorization Program and Fitness For Duty
- Imalement Follow-ua Testing Program.
- Train E MT's to Per ~orm Col: ection anc. Bac.
Security Officer ?erformance
- To Ac.aieve Zero Security Force Errors.
- Enhance Training in t: 1e Area of O.S.R.E. !
- Alarm Station O aerators rec uired i to Train as RTM's.
-Increase Fie.c Suaervision ay 30t:a FPC anc Contractor Personnel.
e zlj' 1 1 2 3 050 50 5
- - - _ _ ~ -
- - - _ } -
E F
A Q I U 2 LI 3 UP RM E E S TN L
O 1
.V J
.A 1 0 A G _
D O
N B G O g 3
U A T
Y R
S A YB P
RTL I
E F
EOS RRE - 1 YYE P E R C .C E
e s 1 9
EV 9 E I
8 N C
O A T N C T E R S C
- 1 e
1 S
O L
S 0 0
~ _ - - -
~ _ - - -
0 2 4 6 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
g cB&
O jE$
1 0 3 9 2
- ~ _ _
- ~ _ _
E F
AQ 9 I U LI UP I RM E E S N F O T I C G T B G Y
R B A YB P
E U
U ATL DS N 4 RYI C OE OC YPI i
C RU SR 1
0 1 c V E
D 0 9 9
E 8 N T
S O 2 4 6 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
[eo g
4 5E$'
1 0 2 4 6 8 0
.v A
5 D
O O 5 R T O
1 E
FQ AU I I 4
Y EN T RYBI C
P T>
I E I B L I
YE A O D S E1 1 P E G T E 9 9
EV 8 E I
N EE S
T RC RU OR E1 S I
1 RT 0 0 _
Y O 2 4 6 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0
a'og3g
, 2 3 , s o 7 8 9 o o o . o o o , o o J
a n r' -
T F
e I W/
b
/
/ o M III II4 t a
r a
l A
p I E I E E I -
r L
Jo M
I E I I E I a
y
\ a g J
u n
I I W\
N
\
ng e
- - a J
u l
y E
1 Ml b a e A
g u
- Y r CI S
p e
t E* 1 v 9e I
O c
t
/ ' 9n t N
o v
II I 8s D
I E I 1 e
c A 9 9
J a
n IEk\ 7 F
e -
b M
a r
L
.