ML20216E463
| ML20216E463 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 09/09/1999 |
| From: | CENTERIOR ENERGY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20216E460 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9909140077 | |
| Download: ML20216E463 (2) | |
Text
.
Atttchm nt 3 PY-CEl/NRR-2406t.
Page i of 2 2.0 Environmental Protection Issues associated with the operation of the two-unit Perry Nuc i
Certain environmental issues were identified which required study or license conditions to resolve environmental concerns and to assure adequate protection of the environment.
2.1 Aquatic Issues (1)
NRC staff in the FES-OL.No specific nonradiological aquatic impact issue l
i (2)
The presence of Asiatic clams (Corbicula sp) in western Lake Erie renders t
their eventual presence near Perry as likely. Should the presence of Corbicula in the vicinity of Perry threaten the operation of a safety system, due to biofouling, measures'to control Corbicula will be undertaken (FESSection4.3.6.2).
Cae+4-= a a 1 E
AL-een (Mau 1800)
.=*=anadwme ek-pf55ES 75!:brEM E5545555,' ~5f555:5'tk'1IA=a==A'c maaH5/4E naeanHal enfatu ralmead
'praarte th;t :::: ht!'e'*
cf the his f;
{
(e) e= 714aa carde ]:, Seth at Parry and at :::,;f C,41j;,;ge;'; ;r th: preraare ef-
- rg ';;;j]_';;;];j rr 0;;;;; (S)==intanance inenacHans ead (c)
- r;;illerce i.uti,,3 T5h C^a addr;;::: th: hte e=-alia; (5)the'::.-
ia 2.2 Terrestrial Iss'ues
(
I,I (1)
Cooling tower drift was not expected to cause adverse effects but the need for operational data to confim this conclusion was identified by the staff.
(FESSection5.5.1.5) i (2)
Herbicide use should conform with current Federal and State regulation.
(FESSection5.5.1.4) m.
2-1
__l PDR A
PDR P
Attachm:nt 3 PY-CEl/NRR-2406L pig 3 2 of 2 4.0' Environmental Conditions 4.1 Unusual or Important Environmental Events Any occurrence of an unusual or important event that indicates or could result in significant environmental impact causally related to plant operation shall be recorded and reported to the NRC within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> followed by a written report per Subsection 5.4.2.
The following are examples:
excessive bird impaction events, onsite plant or animal disease outbreaks, mortality or unusual occurrence of any species protected by the Endangered Species Act of 1973, fish kills, increase in nuisance organisms or conditions, and unanticipated or emergency discharge of waste water or chemical substances.
No routine monitoring programs are required to implement this condition.
I 4.2 Environmental Monitoring 4.2.1 Aquatic Monitoring The cer'ifications and permits required under the clean dater Act (1) t provide mechanisms for protecting water quality and, indirectly, aquatic biota.
The NRC will rely on the decisions made by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency and the State of Ohio under the authority of the Clean Water Act for any requirements for aquatic monitoring.
_(?)
w i-annual (late spring eald early f:11) ;;;.plir.; cf ;rae; at-parry ead the lic;,;;;'; [estle' g plant ;h;il b; ;;adgcted to g
detect th pretene: ef Cerbicela.
The===n11ng methndnlany che11 h-that ;;,,;,,itted t: 7,d dre ihed by tha 14c ac = in its 1 tter dated 0 teber ?,19n7 (py crt/ won-
-0707L}.
m e
'l 4-1 Amendment No. 15
,