ML20215L704
| ML20215L704 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/18/1986 |
| From: | Burnside W NRC |
| To: | Dunleavy J NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215L667 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-588 NUDOCS 8610290252 | |
| Download: ML20215L704 (4) | |
Text
p -
p'j. 0/
FM
/, o o. /G - 4
\\/
APR 181986 hM O'
- ).j
- /
NOTE TO:
James J. Dunleavy, Chief. FPSB FR0t!:
Wayne G. Burnside, FPSB
SUBJECT:
PROTECTIVE PERSONNEL AT WHITE FLINT NORTH Prothetion and Safety Division (FPSDI met with P,andol h Lash and William Till' On A ril 16, 1986, to discuss protective personnel requirements at White Flint North (WFN).
I later telephoned Donald-Hale, FPSD, to further discuss contract guard policies.
The pertinent issues discussed during these meetings / conversations are as follows:
Use of FPD's for all necessary protective personnel coverage at WFN -
Lash stated that we have no chance of utilizing FPO's for the necessary coverage at WFN.
FPSD policy now dictates that contract guards are to be utilized for fixed building protection, and that FPO's will be used in a patrol capacity within the boundaries of a particular zone, i.e. Zone 1 and Zone 8.
Use of FP0's for the Codmission area, i.e.,17th and 18th floors -
Scveral years ago when FPSD implemented its policy of utilizing contact guards over FP0's, we initiated the process of employing contract guards at H Street. The Commission, however, objected and FPO's remained at H Street. According to Lash, the Commission succeeded in retaining the FPO's only because of the " Edgar Amendnent" which precluded automatic removal of federal employees, e.g. FPO's, GSA cleaners, elevator operators, etc., in favor of contract enployees.
Inasruch as the HRC is relocating to a new facility, the " Edgar Amendment" no longer applies, necessitating use of contract guards.
Lash stated, however, that in view of the Comission's preference -
for FP0's, we should write a letter to the cognizant GSA Office, the
'Public Building Services Comission, to request approval for FP0 utilization at certain fixed posts. Lash estimates that we have a j
30% chance of obtaining the necessary approyal.
Use of contract guard force-According to Hale, FPSD will need to let a new contract, taking 6-8 months to. complete, as opposed to renegoti-ating the existing contract with Guardian.
Since FPSD lets contracts on a facility type basis, not on an agency type basis, it would be much easier, from an adninistrative point of view, to select a new contractor.
8610290252 861022
=
~*
- O!
..r -
..u -
l
\\/
._.._3_.--
T
- c. r:. n: nmi uve cm OFFICI AL RECORD COPY
. _. _ _,- L
APR 181986 In light of the fact that the contracting process takes 6-8 months FPSD will need post specifications and funding as soon as possible. I reconnend that we start naking decisions in terns of the exact nurber of guard posts we require, without delay.
I also spoke with Hale concerning the use of temporary guard service at UFU prior to contractor selection. Since FPSD will not have an existing contract from which to take guards Hale is not optimistic about getting temporary guard service. Hale did say, however, that if pers6nnel are available, he r.ay be able to pull guards from other contracts in the area, e.g. HRC or HHS.
.As we discussed, since FPSD is charged with protecting federal buildings, the onus is on it to provide the necessary protection until a contractor is selected.
~
Wayne G. Burnside, FPSB bec:
SCF PHYS 3.07.0 W FAC 1.00.16-2 MCF:
None nCe p JPs5
.mMg,JGYdr'nY!de':'6ii".'.'..".".'
novt) 4/.f../.86
' F C HM 318 00 80) NRCM 0740 p p l(-l A l p p f-. n p n g-. n p y
~
j c.;<-
r/4L l..c.0-A APR 161996 NOTE T0:
Janes J. Dunleavy, Chief, FPSB FRO?':
Wayne G. Burnside, FPSB S'JPJECT:
PROTECTIVE PERSOUNEL AT WHITE FLINT NORTH On April 16, 1986, I met with Randolph Lash and William Tilli an ' Federal Protection and Safety Division (FPSD) to discuss protective pers,onnel requirements at White Flint North (VFN).
I later telephoned Donald-Hale, FPSD, to further discuss contract guard policies.
The pertinent issues discussed during these reetings/ conversations are as follows:
Use of FP0's for all necessary protective personnel coverage at WF?! -
Lash stated that we have no chance of utilizing FPO's for the necessary coverage at UFi!.
FPSD policy now dictates that contract guards are to be utilized for fixed building protection, and that FPO's will be used in a patrol capacity within the boundaries of a particular zone, i.e. Zone 1 and Zone 8.
Use of FPO's for the Comission area, i.e.,17th and 18th floors -
Several years ago when FPS 3 implemented its policy of utilizing contact guards over FPO's, we initiated the process of employing contract guards at H Street.
The Commission, however, obfected and FPO's remained at H Street.
According to Lash, the Comission succeeded in retaining the FP0's only because of the " Edgar A endnent" which precluded automatic removal of federal employees, e.g. FPO's, CSA cleaners, elevator operators, etc., in favor of contract enployees.
Inasruch as the PRC is relocatine to a new facility, the " Edgar A"endnent" no longer applies, necessitating usc of contract guards.
Lash stated, however, that in view of the Commission's preference for FPO's, we should write a letter to the cognizant CSA Office, the
~ Public Puilding Services Cemission, to request approval for FP0 utilization at certain fixed posts.
Lash estinates that we have a 30Y chance of obtaining the necessary appreyal.
'- Use of contract guard force-According to Hale, FPSD will need to let a new contract, taking 6-C onths to conplete, as opposed to renegoti-ating the existing contract with Guardian.
Since FPSD lets contracts nn a facility type basis, not on an agency type basis, it vould be roch easier, from an administrative point of view, to select a new contracter.
g
<*=,m
.-.eee~e-.e
..--wem.mo-=e-
- - - - - * + - * " = " - " ~
- l' w a.% b. '
9 i
e....
A C ' R C ' A L F L J C R.~
~.O ? Y
I APR 181986 1
In light of the fact that the contracting process takes 6-8 months, FPSD will need post specifications and funding as soon as possible. I recomiend that we start nahing decisions in terns of the exact nur.ber of guard pests we rcquire, without delay.
I also spoke uith Hale concerning the use of tenporary guard service at UFU prior to contractor selection.
Since FPSD will not have an existing contract fral ubich to take guards, Hale is not optinistic about getting tulporary guard service, liale did say, however, that if personnel are available, he r.ay be able to pull guards from other contracts in the area, e.g. llRC or HHS.
As we discussed, since FPSD is charged with protecting federal buildings, the onus is on it to provide the necessary protection until a contractor is selected.
Wayne G. Burnside, FPSB PHYS 3.07.01. w W bcc:
SCF FAC 1.00.16-2 MCF:
None p.d5u,PSB'y F
i i.e t >
N r'nYide:' tilts 4../, /.86
.)
,