ML20215L419
| ML20215L419 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/21/1985 |
| From: | Gramm B NRC |
| To: | Lazarus B NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20215L413 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-86-685 NUDOCS 8610290023 | |
| Download: ML20215L419 (6) | |
Text
T,
~
l~%
h)1 sw bu '. bB bRAMM
[Ax lo' IE u U :
Au.e c,e 7 's Cc66 B M-O S-6vBTecT -
2E5toose To a.ckivi fi<o I
b)heb o< wol so@cica.S b was ebkO $< c od irvelav luskMows cd v i ve_.
peo' ck sckdo(co I s id uliEed RA Gde m o I ),/SWt:c tw QC ic.ssc$ ion N#4K fu 0
are
-b reovird iws9acb is 4(adcu9 6Jb5h aTi IN>9ECb 6hb5 (d hlVood'A, aA ctC skaff ks hcve.c<se8 4e etccovnoScdb. % stD uxvb
. h projech d
opbshc as b proKck-S c k c)iA<_ W V u Aoo vt55tve iwdica.kb M QC bspech (tas beu N
C a p IfG51 T
C vi
%kebs Shipre8 do saqpok pro \\cck.scOuk.
act c4od? As sMec9 b 0), m pol (ams bAok is 6 M@kee 'ta 2
(we. hen ic) cad gassing ( ve vived QC j
i kspechoes OccP sa ceskockvs preavtspeckou pgram, l
3 w:k a re4(ace.e 4 Fu & ecc, inc9 at inspechn 4o sure acc<-pkbibh tc.c 9 is GC ide.pevid<xdh ye<Ca nas gnspechows also Peed.s Q A Cd ( \\/tardwwe,
% C.CCP procjra.wt o asdufrac6 GC resv0s Ixck fo 6 craff so k do odr
!E va xal nd
(&covej-ical
). To sowtuv i te, ccc p is
=
a construckow o.cccudtWl yocqmu cwJ h qiven. vio z
ys@
cada 4oCMit(
Aypeedit rec wuwds.
is ipwx/ Mose s'ee EJ, 4
Tonouer skbs is cow.9 dd = % e cd'shwdi ts.wk be otccow.plish/
9 epa ( ualdc6. ideadiOc3/QA recied & g#ncw cbco
$EE (esktagacers
- d. les d (5
pesCcgu. w\\lcdouus +o a ssvu fecjtow T 6s 'ic)cdked [ CAT imspec how l
h m dcvcc.
hcd cli@evencvs ad.sk lockween Ces-hock'enn catc9 ac sacu. sos 8eu %awu o/o w9%s u>u e 1
s cyoss chGfP6d. 9eh ca.use gpecured b loc -LA Ccw ' ochim CaEs lnshtQadicms compkkE piov w ceh cqWg work ie parfied ccdh pol ( Codfkc)
Co GC hawtuer recvires accephosce to be g
l docmkc) l0Vior k CA U cow ( Y L w q G Hk.
QC GC shWs /psh so Sc1 all cliscrepN h/novh l
is pcw 4 o tynshoch 50.5 are VecenacIbcf hk<.ew C at Ln nov e..
d es h -d J -
A&t?$ v.e dz access culwlks %ww se2 Ge.nu S.
&osas % v6cc% vxns t L eGehicJ c&u z are
- m. % had uh.
O
[o,
ks. Gection i
kco dekch8 isolcifid cases (JLve.
otA 09 nukion /voa chawi+p kcure W e-vud Nspcbvs, Cow 6lbf 1 utppep 4 \\~
acSbwon w
b Js an w & J n sc,em pager so oa 4u '~
vis%. huwd (Mhd ruop! ogc (v ws Le 6ew l
L.A
.a.c0 6 up aqp<t %'
45 outr.
as C
tLck CMC \\chk$t9yc%%s a
w chran!is etoisas u RdA 990ew tzshg.
A campob t
ss w wyA en be %
p psL sy m S A 6 he um(6w3 toe 4,
- 7. w<<su us&sw % bk&
oA pssa6 ana b cotavce woma3 v:C &Lup /4 o y x a y N ro p %
% k a. anah % 40 pa u f,
% c&r b dre4B o\\
usea u eke %J uckcauca l
uvipua
%b hcv.1 sea msyda9 e - ea a assu<e Mbg uskttdus Gb ksips were
/
OcA & G.sSun ilComC c0 WtN \\ eAA0cv Sti6wiC propa %%
css 9}c unikas u osec3 % Reh9, S
h aa;E+ckva$ ss dest r
bbv (ok pvocoanesd uJ
% iwia cra v cc I
esk ask.'
pe emaQ a4 %E
%prLJ
% dc d
is s % u avea kwwa wL csula \\x uk o)t l
a p<ku) los(W^0 ad verk9 a5wst senwac desh akc leh"d.
B.
Swec_ Ws ML cLcc, bur 40 cmapL JL
{tcase C unc ) nwtaywoe ckciscovs, u' JA nas c>c4eckrci Bak y U das<e (MAc3 pwgel gdh mama sAsb4cd e ( Te c %gd E c 3% w~
\\ s % y eved r
iu u ss.
eas aLwe unc suckk qwh L appsit ;L rxsveuechs swec proyn s aavexsa 4o dwo as ms Beer ()enkoxceJ eves year.Tkaprol<<k tw.biMous-houver we kaae net Sche)vb is vewgiac1 <dahemskip h adverse c(py
&cbd e d G
S%%s >
V i
l
/
ALLEGATION PANEL DECISIONS PANEL MEETING 3:
Priority: Medium f)
Q An allegation panel reconvened on 3/27/85 regarding RI-85-A-0012 following W. Lazarus' interview with the alleger.
Those in attendance were:
R. Starostecki Panel Chairman S. Collins Branch Chief J. Linville Action Office Contact W. Kane Deputy Director H. Kister Chief, RPB-1 J. Strosnider Chief, RPS-IC W. Lazarus Project Engineer, RPS-2C E. Kelly Project Engineer, RPS-1C A. Shropshire Office Allegation Coordinator FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS:
NINE MILE POINT UNIT 2:
1)
Section Chief to write letter to licensee to follow-up on one of two technical problems identified after reviewing the alleger's transcript:
licensee will have to do a record review of samples taken by Gould Equipment pertaining to torque checks of fasteners in accordance with vendor technical manual QD 4f4/85]
]
A11eger relates to changes and deletion:, to Engineering l
Specifications but provides no more details.
The Panel agreed that this area was too vaguely described to inspect.
2)
Review licensee's response and document in Inspection Report (ECD 5/15/85).
SHOREHAM:
1)
This item is opened under allegation RI-85-A-0037.
In regard to the alleger's opinion of the NRC's Readiness Assessment Team Inspection of two years ago, a letter will be sent clarifying the purpose of that inspection and why his assessment of the inspection was considered but not used.
(See RI-85-A-0037 for more details).
Division Director concurrence required for closeout.
- k. S fc YV A. Shrops re, OAC TT1vi lle, AOC
.R'. Starostecki Pan Chairman cc:
J. Allan s
N J. Gutierrez J. Linvillei R. Christopher, 01:RI Allegation File D. Caphton AE l
ALLEGATION PANEL DECISIONS
/' 'T FIRST MEETING
(,/
Prfority: Medium An allegation panel met on 1/30/85 regarding RI-85-A-0012 which was received by the OAC on 1/31/85.
Those in attendance were:
R. Starostecki Panel Chairman S. Collins Branch Chief W. Lazarus (Acting) Action Office Contact W. Kane Deputy Director A. Shropshire Office Allegation Coordinator FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS OF FIRST MEETING:
1)
Resident inspector to examine programs of Stone & Webster's for QC problems (ECD 03/01/85) and document in inspection report (ECD 03/15/85).
2)
Section Chief to write a letter to the alleger for the Division Director's signature including timeframes and previous actions taken in this area at Nine Mile Point (ECD 2/8/85).
Division Director concurrence required for closeout.
(s Previously signed and distributed following the first panel meeting by
(
I A. Shropshire, OAC S. Collins, AOC R. Starostecki
's I
Panel Chairman SECOND MEETING An allegation panel reconvened on 2/25/85 regarding RI-85-A-0012 following a 2nd letter from the alleger in reply to telephone conversations with W. Lazarus.
l Those in attendance were:
(Same as Above)
FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS:
1)
Acting Section Chief to interview the alleger in an attempt to obtain more specific information pertinent to Nine Mile Point and Shoreham including any documentation that the alleger may have.
Division Director concurrence required for closeout.
S,.g G + Lie iela :
i A. Shropshire, OAC
- 5. Collins, AOC R. Starostecki Panel Chairman J Allan
\\'
J. Gutierrez R. Christopher, 01:RI i
D. Caphton W. Lazarus Allegation File l
ALLEGATION DESCRIPTION
(,)
Nine Mile Point 2 50-410 (Site or Licensee)
(Docket No.)
Allegation RI-85-A-0012 was received on 1/26/85 by T. Murley.
Characterization of the concerns:
Milestone schedules causing poor work practices and quality control omissions.
Confidentiality:
No Name:
Employer:
Former S&W employee Address:
Position:
Elect. Sprint. of Const.
Phone:
Type of Regulated Activity:
Reactor Functional Area (s):
Construction DETAILS:
(Timeframe of Allegation:
Spring of 1984 (termination as of 5/84))
Letter addressed to the Regional " Director" from a fermer Stone & Webster '
(
}
employee who was the Manager of UNIC0 Planning & Scheduling; Electrical Superintendent of Construction; and, Quality Accountability Task Force Leader at Shoreham.
Individual sited poor work practices and quality difficulties brought on by Nine Mile Point 2 management.
SECOND LETTER A second letter was sent by the alleger following telephone discussions with W. Lazarus.
This letter lacked specifics as did the first letter.
_