ML20214X013

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards to Seismic Qualification Util Group Granting Extension of Reporting Provisions of Generic Ltr 87-02 to 871201,to All Participating Licensees.Util Also Covered by That Extension
ML20214X013
Person / Time
Site: Crystal River Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/05/1987
From: Silver H
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Wilgus W
FLORIDA POWER CORP.
References
GL-87-02, GL-87-2, NUDOCS 8706160296
Download: ML20214X013 (2)


Text

/

-k 'j

June 5, 1987 DISTRIBUTION

. Docket No. 50-302 4Mnt,.

J. Partlow NRC PDR ACRS (10)

Local PDR Gray File

- Mr. W. S. Wilgus S

a Vice President, Nuclear Operations

c. Lainas

- Florida Power Corporation D. Miller ATTN: Manager, Nuclear Licensing H. silver sta R r, Florida,32629 J. Partlow

Dear Mr. Wilgus:

The enclosed letter dated April 28, 1987, to the Seismic Qua*41fication Utility Group (SQUG) granted an extension of the reporting provisions of Generic Latter 87-02 to December 1,1987, to all licensees participating in SQUG. Florida Power Corporation is a member of SQUG and is therefore covered by that extension.

Sincerely,

/s/

Harley Silver, Project Manager Project Directorate II-2 Division of Reactor Projects-I/II

Enclosure:

As stated

'cc: See next page L

?)Le

- PM: >D22 D:PD22 rr HSilver:he LRubenstein 6

/87-6/6/87 6/ 5 /87 8706160296 870605 PDR ADOCK 05000302 P

PDR

Mr. W..S. Wilgus Crystal River Unit No. 3 Nuclear Florida Power Corporation Generating Plant cc:

Mr. R. W. Neiser State Planning and Development Senior Vice President Clearinghouse and General Counsel Office of Planning and Budget Florida Power Corporation Executive Office of the Governor P. O. Box 14042 The Capitol Building St. Petersburg, Florida 33733 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Mr. P. F. McKee Mr. F. Alex Griffin, Chairman Director, Nuclear Plant Operations Board of County Comissioners Florida Power Corporation Citrus County P. O. Box 219 110 North Apopka Avenue Crystal River, Florida 32629 Inverness, Florida 36250 Mr. Robert B. Borsum Mr. E. C. Simpson Babcock & Wilcox Director Nuclear Site Nuclear Power Generation Division Florida Power Corporation Support Suite 220, 7910 Woodmont Avenue P.O. Box 219 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Crystal River, Florida 32629 Resident Inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 15760 West Powerline Street Crystal River, Flcrida 32629 Regional Administrator, Region II U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 101 Marietta Street N.W., Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Jacob Daniel Nash Office of Radiation Control Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 1317 Winewood Blvd.

Tallahassee, Florida 32399 0700 Administrator Department of Environmental Regulation Power Plant Siting Section State of Florida 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Attorney General Department of Legal Affairs The Capitol Tallahassee, Florida 32304

f, a

+.'!.

an mag g'o,,

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

..1 y

wasmwoToN D,C.20666 i

\\*****/

i APR 2 81987 Mr. Ne11'P.-Smith Chairman Seismic Qualification Utility Group 801 18th Street,_N.W.

Suite 300 Washington,.D.C. 20006,

Dear Mr. Smith:

f I have received Your letter dated April 10,1987 requesting clarification of the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02.

In Generic Letter 87-02, the staff requested that each licensee subject to the USI A-46 equipment seismic adequacy verification requirements provide a schedule for implementation of the seismic verification within 60 days of recefpt of the Generic Letter.

In your letter you stated that licensees who belong to the Seismic

-Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) will be unable to provide a schedule for implementation at this time because the generic implementation procedures are still under development by the SQUG and will not be finalized until the completion of several trial plant reviews.

The staff has/ reviewed your request and concluded that it is appropriate to extend the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02 for SQUG licensees until the generic implementation procedures are better defined

.l and the trial plant reviews are completed. It is my understanding that the SQUG generic implementation procedures should be essentially complete before By that date at least two trial plant reviews will have been October 1,1987.

completed and the generic implementation procedures sufficiently defined and reviewed by NRC staff so~ that licensees can plan and schedule their plant specific reviews.

All licensees participating in the USI A-46 SQUG implementation program should provide the schedule for plant specific implementation no later than The NRC staff will review and evaluate the generic December 1,1987.

l procedures by October 1, to allow each utility 60 days to prepare their replies to the generic letter.

l Sincerely, i

i Thomas E. Murley, hwr Office.of Nuclear Reactor Regulation M3hNd~

i

---