ML20214H794

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Requests Schedule for Implementation of Seismic Verification Program,Per Generic Ltr 87-02 by 871201.TE Murley Granting Extension of 60-day Reporting Requirement Per 870410 Request Encl
ML20214H794
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/20/1987
From: Sylvester E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Utley E
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
REF-GTECI-A-46, REF-GTECI-SC, TASK-A-46, TASK-OR GL-87-02, GL-87-2, NUDOCS 8705270499
Download: ML20214H794 (1)


Text

May 20, 1987

' DISTRIBUTION:

Docket Nos. 50-325 N' 50-324 NRC & Local PDRs PD21 r/f JPartlow Mr. E. E. Utley SVarga ACRS (10)

Senior Executive Vice President Glainas Power Supply and Engineering & Construction EAdensam Carolina Power & Light Company PAnderson Post Office Box 1551 ESylvester Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 OGC-Bsda EJordan

Dear Mr. Utley:

SUBJECT:

GENERIC LETTER 87-02 REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 Generic Letter 87-02, " Verification of Seismic Adequacy of Mechanical and

, Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors, Unresolved Safety Issue (USI) A-46,"

l was issued on February 19, 1987, to all licensees of operating reactors to which the' requirements of USI A-46 applied. By that letter, you were requested to provide a schedule for implementation of the seismic verification program at

, the Brunswick facility within 60 days of receipt of that letter. Subsequently, the Seismic Qualification Utilities Group (SQUG), of which you are a member, i formally requested an extension of the 60 day reporting requirements for l licensees who are members of the SQUG. The extension was granted in the

enclosed letter from Thomas E. Murley, Director of the NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, to Neil P. Smith, Chairman of the SQUG, dated April 28, l 1987. In accordance with the provisions of that letter, you are hereby granted l an extension until December 1, 1987, to provide the schedule for the Brunswick l seismic verification program.

Sincerely,

/S/

l Ernest D. Sylvester, Project Manager l Project Directorate 11-1 l Division of Reactor Projects - I/II

Enclosure:

As stated cc: See next page LA:P R PM:PD21:DRPR h D: .DRPR PAnd -

ESylvjster/vag EAden am 05/; /87 05/15/87 05/JC/87 NO Db 4 l P l

ENCLOSURE

'em UNITED STATES

/ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

/ wAsmwcTow.o.c.aosss ]

f E j i k**"* / APR 2 81987

\

i

= l Mr. Neil P. Smith Chairman Seismic Qualification Utility Group 801 18th Street, N.W.

Suite 300 4 Washington, D.C. 20006,

Dear Mr. Smith:

I have received Your letter dated April 10, 1987 requesting clarification of the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02. In Generic Letter j 87-02, the staff requested that each licensee subject to the USI A-46 equipment seismic adequacy verification requirements provide a schedule for 4

implementation of the seismic verificatio'n within 60 days of receipt of the  ;

ii Generic Letter.

l In your letter you stated that licensees who belong to the Seismic

' Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) will be unable to provide a schedule for implementation at this time because the generic implementation procedures are still under development by the SQUG and will not be finalized until the completion of several trial plant reviews.

The staff hasfreviewed your request and concluded that it is appropriate to

extend the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02 for SQUG licensees until the generic implementation procedures are better defined
i and the trial plant reviews are completed. It is my understanding that the

, 1 SQUG generic implementation procedures should be essentially complete before October 1,1987. By that date at least two trial plant reviews will have been completed and the generic implementation procedures sufficiently defined and reviewed by NRC staff so~that licensees can plan and schedule their plant specific reviews.

All licensees participating in the USI A-46 SQUG implementation program should provide the schedule for plant specific implementation no later than December 1, 1987. The NRC staff will review and evaluate the generic l'

procedures by October 1, to allow each utility 60 days to prepare their replies to the generic letter.

Sincerely, Thomas E. Murley, M.aur Office. of Nuclear Reactor Regulation v

3

Mr. E. E. Utley Brunswick Steam Electric Plant Carolina Power & Light Company Units 1 and 2 cc:

Mr. P. W. Howe Mr. C. R. Dietz Vice President Plant General Manager Brunswick Nuclear Project Brunswick Nuclear Project Box 10429 Box 10429 Southport, North Carolina 28461 Southport, North Carolina 28461 Thomas A. Baxter, Esquire Mr. H. A. Cole Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Special Deputy Attorney General 2300 N Street, N. W. State of North Carolina Washington, D. C. 20037 Post Office Box 629 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Mr. D. E. Hollar Associate General Counsel Mr. Robert P. Gruber Carolina Power & Light Company Executive Director Post Office Box 1551 Public Staff - NCUC Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Post Office Box 29520 Raleigh, North Carolina 27626-0520,

~

Mr. Christopher Chappell, Chairman Board of Comissioners Post Office Box 249 Bolivia, North Carolina 28422 Mrs. Chrys Baggett State Clearinghouse Budget and Management 116 West Jones Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27603 Resident Inspector U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Star Route 1 Post Office Box 208 Southport, North Carolina 28461 Regional Administrator, Region II U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 101 Marietta Street, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Mr. Dayne H. Brown, Chief Radiation Protection Branch Division of Facility Services N. C. Department of Human Resources 701 Barbour Drive Raleigh, North Carolina 27603-2008

__ , ,._ , .- _ . . . . _ .