ML20214F660
| ML20214F660 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1987 |
| From: | Capra R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Tiernan J BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO. |
| References | |
| REF-GTECI-A-46, REF-GTECI-SC, TASK-A-46, TASK-OR GL-87-02, GL-87-2, NUDOCS 8705260203 | |
| Download: ML20214F660 (3) | |
Text
,
. Docket Nos. 50-317 DISTRIBUTION and-50-318 ugenstmiea S. McNeil NCRPDR OGC Local PDR E.. Jordan PDI-1 Rdg.
J. Partlow S. Varga ACRS(10)
Mr. J. ~ A. Tiernan B. Boger L. Tripp.
Vice President - Nuclear Energy _
C. Vogan:
-Baltimore Gas and Electric Company P. 0. Box 1475. -
Baltimore, Maryland 21203
Dear-Mr. Tiernan:
SUBJECT:
- RELIEF FROM 60 DAY REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF GENERIC LETTER 87-02 Re:.Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Generic Letter 87-02, dated February 19, 1987, was issued to all licensees
~
subject to implement the requirements of USI-46, " Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants". The generic letter requested that each affected licensee provide an implementation schedule for' seismic adequacy verification within 60 days.
By letter to the NRC, dated April 10, 1987, the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) stated that its member utilities would be unable to provide the required response within the specified time because generic implementation procedures were still under development. The SQUG thereby requested-that an extension be granted.
The staff reviewed this extension request and, by letter to the. Chairman of SQUG dated April 28,1987 (Enclosure -1), granted schedular relief to SQUG.
member utilities. Therefore, in accordance with Enclosure 1, you are requested to provide a schedule for implementation of-the' requirements of -
USI-46 for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant no later than December 1, 1987.
Sincerely, Robert A.'Capra, Acting Director
)
Project Directorate I-1 Division of Reactor.-Projects, I/II Enclosure As stated j
cc: See next page
.PDI-1 g
.PDI-1 47 PDI-1 f
CVogan SMcNeil RCapra l
5/4/87f f/7/87.
5/4 /87
.i)
~
re w.i' e
j s
97052gog ( h oo g -
a PDR p
_P.
.j a
May 12, 1987
. Docket Nos. 50-317 DISTRIBUTION and 50-318 Docket File S. McNeil NCRPDR OGC.
' Local PDR
'E. Jordan PDI-1 Rdg.
.J. Partlow-S. Varga ACRS(10)
Mr.- J. A. Tiernan B. Boger.
L. Tripp Vice President - Nuclear Energy C. Vogan Baltimore Gas and Electric Company P. 0.~ Box 1475 Baltimore, Maryland 21203
Dear Mr. Tiernan:
SUBJECT:
RELIEF FROM 60 DAY REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF GENERIC LETTER.87-02 j
Re: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 Generic Letter 87-02, dated l February 19,1987, was issued to all licensees subject to implement the. requirements of USI-46, " Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating' Plants." The generic. letter requested that each I
affected licensee provide an implementation schedule for' seismic adequacy.
verification within 60 days.
]
i i
By letter to the NRC, dated April 10, 1987, the Seismic Qualification Utility -
l Group (SQUG) stated that its member utilities would be unable to provide the required response within the specified time because generic implementation procedures were still under development. The SQUG'thereby requested that an extension be granted..
~
The staff reviewed this extension request and, by letter to the Chairman'of SQUG dated April 28,1987 (Enclosure'1),: granted schedular relief to SQUG member utilities. Therefore, in accordance with. Enclosure 1, you are requested to provide a schedule for implementation of the requirements of USI-46 for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant no later than December.1,-1987.
' Sincerely, Robert A. Capra,-Acting Director.
Project Directorate I-1
~
Division of Reactor Projects, I/II.
Enclosure As stated cc: See next page
- SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCE PDI-1 PDI-1 PDI-1 CVogan*
SMcNeil*
RCapra~
5/07/87 5/07/87 S/es./87,
[
l J-
- --Y
Mr. J. A. Tiernan Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Baltimore Gas & Electric Company cc:
Mr. William T. Bowen, President Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cormission Calvert County Board of Office of Executive Director Commissioners Prince Frederick, Maryland 20768 for Operations 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, Pennys1vania 19406 D. A. Brune, Esq.
General Counsel Baltimore Gas and Electric Company P. O. Box 1475 Baltimore, Maryland 21203
- Jay E. Silberg Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge 2300 N Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20037 Mr. M. E. Bowman, General Supervisor Technical Services Engineering Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant MD Rts 2 & 4, P. O. Box 1535 Lusby, Maryland 20657-0073 Resident Inspector c/o U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 437 Lusby, Maryland 20657-0073 Bechtel Power Corporation ATTN: Mr. D. E. Stewart Calvert Cliffs Project Engineer 15740 Shady Grove Road Gaithersburg, Maryland 20760 Combustion Engineering, Inc.
ATTN: Mr. W. R. Horlacher, III Project Manaaer
(
P. O. Box 500 1000 Prospect Hill Road Windsor, Connecticut 06095-0500 Department of Natural Resources Energy Administration, Power Plant Siting Program ATTN: Mr. T. Magette Tawes State Office Building Annapolis, Maryland 21204
. p msg'q, -
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION UNITED STATES
- g f_
WASHWGTON, D. C. 20555
%,*****/
APR 2 81987 i
.o Mr. Neil P. Smith Chaiman i
Seismic Qualification Utility Group 801 18th Street, N.W.
Suite 300 Washington, D.C.
- 20006,
Dear Mr.:
Smith:
'I have received'your letter dated April 10, 1987 requesting clarification of
+
the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02. In Generic Letter 87-02, the staff requested that each licensee subject to the USI A-46 equipment seismic adequacy verification requirements provide a schedule for implementation of the seismic verification within 60 days of receipt of the Generic Letter.
In your letter you stated that licensees who belong to the Seismic Qualification Utility Group (SQUG) will be unable to provide a schedule for implementation at this time because the generic implementation procedures are still'under development by the SQUG and will not b4' finalized until the completion of.seygral trial plant reviews.
r
~
The staff hat / reviewed your request and concluded that it is appropriate to extend the 60-day reporting provisions of Generic Letter 87-02 for SQUG licensees until the generic implementation procedures are better defined and the trial plant reviews are completed'. It is my understanding that the SQUG generic implementation procedures should be essentially complete before October 1,1987. By that date at least two trial plant reviews will have been completed and the generic implementation procedures sufficiently defined and'
-reviewed by hRC staff so that licensees can plan and schedule their plant specific reviews.
All licensees participating in the USI A-46 SQUG implementation program should provide the schedule for plant specific implementation no later than December 1, 1987. The NRC staff will review and evaluate the generic procedures by October 1, to allow each utility 60 days to prepare their replies to the generic letter.
Sincerely, i
Thomas E. Murley, M. owr L
0ffice of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
~
9 N
L b
m
___ _ _ ___._-_ _,__ _ _