ML20214A542
| ML20214A542 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 05/12/1987 |
| From: | Brown W, Russell J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20214A438 | List: |
| References | |
| MC-40709-SQN, MC-40709-SQN-R02, MC-40709-SQN-R2, NUDOCS 8705190491 | |
| Download: ML20214A542 (18) | |
Text
o TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40709-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REPORT TYPE: Sequoyah Nuclear Plant - Element REVISION NUMBER: 2 (R2 (Final Report)
TITLE: Material Personnel - Search for PAGE 1 0F 8 Defective Material REASON FOR REVISION:
l 1.
To attach the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) l NOTE: The issue was escalated to the Employee Concerns Task Group (ECTG) l Manager in accordance with the ECTG Program Manual. Resolution was l
received from the ECTG Manager in memorandum T25 870505 912 attached.
l The subject memorandum has the CAP attached. The ECTG evaluators are l
not in agreement with the CAP. The revision level was raised to R2; I
however, the contents of the report at Revision Level I have not been lR2 altered in order to preserve the report the evaluators prepared and l
l signed.
I 2.
To indicate that the problem identified in this report was determined l
to be applicable to Browns Ferry, Bellefonte and Watts Bar Nuclear Plants.
l The generic applicability column on Attachment A of the report should have l
l a "Y" under BF, BL and WB.
PREPARATION PREPARED BY:
N/A (See NOTE under " Reason for Revision" No. 1)
SIGNATURE DATE REVIEWS PEER:
!j N/A (See NOTE under " Reason for Revision" No. 1) 1 SIGNATURE DATE I
j TAS:
N/A (See NOTE under " Reason for Revision" No. 1)
SIGNATURE DATE 4
CONCURRENCES j
YALO G8L $ l$ hl S*I2*07 SRP:
A CEG GNATURE ~ /
TATE' SIGNATURES DATE iL3 d)"N57 N/A W Ed5P hAN5GER [
'DNfE '
MANAGER OF NUCLEAR POWER DATE u
CONCURRENCE (FINAL REPORT ONLY)
- SRP Secretary's signature denotes SRP concurrences are in files.
5068T e
8705190491 870513
}
PDR ADOCK 05000327 t
P pyg
- _-=
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40709-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 2 0F 8 I.
INTRODUCTION This evaluation was performed as a result of a Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) specific concern No. XX-85-027-X04 and addresses the conclusion:
. a need to re-evaluate the material control and accounting program relative to Ray Hiller Inc.,
material at the Sequoyah Nuclear facility."
as stated in the Employee Response Team (ERT) Interim Report No. XX-85-027-XO4.
II.
SUMMARY
OF PERCEIVED PROBLEM The perceived problem is that materials personnel at SQN were not given an opportunity to verify whether or not defective material had been received on site from a certain manufacturer and a report to Knoxville that the material was not on site was made without input from materials personnel.
III.
EVALUATION MET 8(ODOLOGY T
1-A.
Reviewed Employee Concerns Tast Group (ECTG) working files, expurgated files, and Nuclear Safety Review Staff (NSRS) unexpurgated files to obtain additional information.
B.
Reviewed ERT Interim Report No. XX-85-027-X04 to determine if it adequately addresses the perceived problem.
C.
Reviewed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Office of Inspection and Enforcement Bulletin (IEB) 83-07, "APPARENTLY FRAUDULENT PRODUCTS SOLD BY RAY MILLER, INC.", to determine the reporting requirements relative to Ray Miller, Inc., material.
D.
Conducted interviews with NRC personnel to gain a clearer perspective of the scope and reporting requirements of IEB 83-07.
E.
Reviewed Watts Bar Nuclear Plant (WBN) ECTG Element Report No. MC-40709, " Material Personnel", for application to SQN.
F.
Conducted interviews with personnel in various Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) nuclear power organizations to determine if materials personnel were given an opportunity to verify whether or not defective material was on site and if a report was made to Knoxville that material was not on site.
l l
I I
L
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40709-SQN s
SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 3 0F 8 G.
Reviewed documentation associated with the TVA response to IEB 83-07 to determine whether or not a report was made to Knoxville that no Ray Miller, Inc., material was on site.
H.
Reviewed documentation associated with the TVA response to IEB 83-07 to determine whether or not the TVA response to IEB 83-07 was adequate.
IV.
SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS A.
A review of the ECTG working files, expurgated files, and NSRS unexpurgated files revealed no additional information.
B.
A review of ERT Interim Report No. IX-85-027-X04 revealed that the concern grew out of the TVA investigation into whether or not any material from a certain vendor (Ray Miller, Inc.), identified by IEB 83-07, had been received at SQN.
The ERT report does not adequately address the perceived problem that maturial personnel were not allowed to determine whether or not receipt of Ray Miller, Inc., material and the subsequent reporting to Knoxville of no such material being on site, occurred at SQN.
The ERT report states, "A complete investigation was not conducted and a conclusive statement relative to substantiation cannot be provided...."
However, based upon the information presented in several Nonconforming Item (NCI) reports and the TVA response to IEB 83-07, it concluded;
... a need to re-evaluate the material control and accounting program relative to Ray Miller, Inc.,
material at the Sequoyah Nuclear facility."
This conclusion is valid; however, part of the basis for the ERT conclusion is in error, in that the referenced NCIs, are for Ray Hiller, Inc., material purchased on contracts that are outside the required time frame (1975 through 1979). This ECTG evaluation also revealed the TVA response to IEB 83-07 to be in error, see Section IV.H of this ECTG report for details. The NCIs referenced by the ERT report are as follows:
a TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40709-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 4 0F 8 NCI NO.
CONTRACT NO.
CONTRACT DATE N2-80-1210 80PK2 - 304432 07/23/80 N2-81-1751 80PK7 - 307141 09/19/80 N2-81-1252 80PK7 - 307141 09/19/80 N2-83-1887 80PK2 - 304432 07/23/80 N2-83-1888 80PK2 - 289063 07/22/80 N2-83-1889 80PK7 - 307141 09/19/80 N2-83-1890 80PK6 - 323787 09/28/81 N2-83-1897 82PK6 - 323787 09/28/81 N2-83-1901 80PK7 - 307141 09/19/80 N2-83-1902 80PK2 - 289063 07/22/80 C.
A review of IEB 83-07, "APPARENTLY FRAUDULENT PRODUCTS SOLD BY RAY MILLER, INS.", revealed that TVA must file a report on the receipt and disposition of all Ray Miller, Inc., material received during the timeframe 1975 through 1979. This report must contain information about Ray Miller. Inc., material whether identified through an apparently fraudulent data file supplied with the bulletin, or identified by TVA's own initiative. The report must contain the identification of all Ray Miller, Inc., material installed in safety-related systems along with its safety-significance evaluation and the disposition of all Ray Miller. Inc., material that remained in stock.
D.
Interviews were conducted with NRC personnel to gain a clearer perspective concerning the scope and reporting requirements of IEB 83-07.
These interviews revealed the following:
1.
The timeframe of interest is January 1975 through December 1979.
2.
Reporting is required for any item installed in a safety-related system along with its safety-significance evaluation.
3.
Reporting the disposition of any material that remained in stock is required.
4.
Any reporting of material received outside the timeframe requires complete reportability of material on that contract.
E.
A review of WBN, ECTG Element Report No. MC-40709 " Material Personnel", revealed that the investigation for Ray Miller, Inc.,
material for WBN was performed by the Nuclear Engineering Support Branch (NEB), Knoxville, in preparation for the formal response to IEB 83-07.
This report further revealed that NRC had closed IEB 83-07 for WBN.
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40709-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 5 0F 8 The report concluded, "Through interviews and research no evidence was found to indicate WBN had received material from Ray Millor, Inc., or that any employee was impeded in the search for this material."
The conclusion is not concurred with because evidence was found during the SQN evaluation indicating WBN had received Ray Miller.
l Inc., material, see Section IV.H.2 of this ECTG report for details.
F.
Interviews conducted with TVA personnel involved in the search for Ray Miller, Inc., material at TVf Nuclear Plant Sites, including SQN, did not reveal any instances of material personnel not being
~
given an opportunity to verify whether or not defective material had been received on site from Ray Miller, Inc. However, interviewees indicated that possibly a report of no material being on site was made to Knoxville.
Interviewees further revealed that documents (both formal and informal) describing the search and reporting process for Ray Miller. Inc., material were stored in the Quality Services Branch (QSB) Library, in Chattanooga. A review of this documentation is contained in Sections IV.G and IV.H of this ECTG report.
G.
A review of the documentation associated with TVA's response to IEB 83-07 revealed the following:
1.
A memorandum from the Manager, Nuclear Licensing, to the Director of Nuclear Power and the Chief Nuclear Engineering Support Branch (A27 330819 003), dated August 19, 1983, designated the responsibilities for preparation of the TVA response, for certain plants, to the specific actions required of them by IEB 83-07.
The Division of Nuclear Power (DNP) was designated to be the lead organization in developing the SQN-related response te the bulletin. NEB was designated to be the lead organization for the WBN and Bellefonte Nuclear Plant (BLN) response.
2.
A response to IEB 83-07 for all TVA nuclear plants was outlined in a memorandum from the Chief Nuclear Engineering Support Branch, to the Manager of Nuclear Licensing (A27 840228 006),
dated February 24, 1984. This memorandum identified only one instance of Ray Miller, Inc., material used in a safety-related system, at BLN, and none for other TVA nuclear plants, including SQN. This response was written for all TVA nuclear plants even though DNP was to respond for SQN.
L
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40709-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 6 0F 8 3.
The SQN-related response to IEB 83-07 was outlined in a memorandum from the Director of Nuclear Power, to the Manager, Nuclear Licensing (L16 840224 884), dated March 2, 1984.
This memorandum identified five instances of Ray Miller, Inc.,
material installed in safety-related systems, at SQN. Two were in Critical Systems, Structures and Components (CSSC) applications and three were in non-CSSC applications.
4 A response, superseding memorandum No. A27 840228 006, to IEB 83-07 for all TVA nuclear plants was outlined in a memorandum from the Chief Nuclear Engineering Support Branch, to the Manager of Nuclear Licensing (A27 840321 011), dated March 20, 1984 This memorandum identified four instances of Ray Miller, Inc., material installed in safety-related systems at TVA nuclear plants. Two of these items were for SQN and the others were for BLN and Yellow Creek Nuclear Plant (YCN).
Again, this memorandum was written for all TVA nuclear plants even though DNP was to respond for SQN and did, as indicated in paragraph three above.
5.
TVA's official response to IEB 83-07 for SQN and other TVA nuclear plant sites, is outlined in a letter from the Manager, Nuclear Licensing, to the Regional Administrator, Region II, United States (U.S.) NRC (A27 840322 014), dated March 22, 1984.
This letter contains only the items identified by the NEB memorandum (A27 840321 011) and does not include items identified in the DNP memorandum (L16 840224 884) discussed in paragraph three above.
In summary, although no evidence was found that a report was made to Knoxville, it is believed that this portion of the concern stems from a memorandum (A27 840228 006) issued by NEB, from Knoxville, indicating that no Ray Miller, Inc., material was supplied to or installed in any safety-related system, at SQN. This memorandum was superseded by a memorandum (A27 840321 011) identifying only two instances of Ray Miller, Inc., material having been installed in safety-related systems, at SQN. These memorandums are contrary to a DNP memorandum (L16 840224 884) identifying five instances of Ray Miller, Inc., material having been installed in safety-related systems, at SQN. Although DNP was responsible for the SQN related response (A27 830819 003), the NEB response memorandum (A27 840321 011) became the basis for TVA's response to IEB 83-07.
This has resulted in identified Ray Miller, Inc., material installed in safety-related systems, at SQN, that has not been reported to NRC.
v.
se TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40709-SQN 7*
SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 7 0F 8 H.
A review of TVA's response (A27 840322 014) to IEB 83-07, dated March 22, 1984, and associated documentation revealed the following:
1.
The two items identified in TVA's response (A27 840322 014) to IEB 83-07 for SQN are Ray Hiller. Inc., material purchased and received on contracts that are outside the 1975 through 1979 timeframe (i.e., 80PK2 - 289063 and 80PK7 - 307141).
2.
The following contracts for Ray Miller, Inc., material purchased and received, both directly and indirectly, during the 1975 through 1979 timeframe were not dispositioned or addressed in TVA's response (A27 840322 014) to IEB 83-07.
SQN 78K80 - 772426 SQN 78K82 - 779675 - 1 SQN 79K82 - 782908 SQN 79K88 - 780547 SQN 79P87 - 272960 - 02 WBN 78K87 - 556304 WBN 78P82 - 235168 WBN 79P82 - 269979 3.
A TVA memorandum from the Head. Procurement Program Group to the Quality Engineering Branch-(0QA 840210 703), dated February 10, 1984, contained a list, of secondary companies identified as having potentially supplied material from Ray Miller, Inc., resulting from an evaluation of IEB 83-07, Supplement 1.
The results of this evaluation, including the response from Goulds Pumps, Inc., (L16 840323 194) were omitted from TVA's response (A27 840322 014) to IEB 83-07.
4.
TVA's evaluation of SQN contract No. 79P88-1613 (identified in IEB 83-07, Attachment 1, page 259 of 277) is omitted from TVA's response (A27 840322 014) to IEB 83-07.
SQN is identified as both the " buyer" and " delivery point" for this.
contract with the " order date", 03/02/79.
CONCLUSION:
This evaluation revealed the search for Ray Miller, Inc., material at SQN included site "Haterial Personnel".
No evidence or indication was found, that:
... materials personnel were not given an opportunity to verify whether or not defective material had been received on site, from a certain manufacturer (Ray Miller, Incorporated)
TVA EMPLOYEE CONCERNS REPORT NUMBER: MC-40709-SQN SPECIAL PROGRAM REVISION NUMBER: 2 PAGE 8 0F 8 Therefore, this portion of the perceived problem is not valid.
Even though no report was found, the remaining portion of the perceived problem:
... a report to Knoxville that the material was not on site was made without input from materials persor.nel."
is believed to be valid. This conclusion'is based upon interviews with TVA personnel (see Section IV.F) and memorandum (A27 840228 006) issued by NEB, from Knoxville, indicating that no Ray Miller. Inc.,
material was supplied to or installed in any safety-related system, at SQN, (see Section IV.G).
While the material on contract No. 80PK2-289063 and 80PK7-307141 was not subject to the reporting requirements of IEB 83-07, the fact that TVA has reported the status of a portion of this material requires that the status of all material on these contracts be reported to NRC.
Due to this deficiency and the fact that the status of material on several contracts, falling within the timeframe 1975 through 1979, was not reported, it is concluded that a re-evaluation of the identification and subsequent reporting of Ray Miller, Inc., be made [ reference SQN specific Corrective Action Tracking Document (CATD) No. 40709-SQN-01 and corporate CATD No. 40709-NPS-01].
V.
ROOT CAUSE There was no clear understanding on the part.of Nuclear Licensing, NEB, and DNP of TVA's reporting responsibilities for the SQN response to IEB 83-07.
VI.
CORRECTIVE ACTION To be provided by line erganizations.
Reference CATD Nos. 40709-SQN-01 and 40709-NPS-01 VII.
GENERIC APPLICABILITY Determined generic to Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN), BLN, SQN and VBN due to the fact that TVA's response to IEB 83-07 is in error and must be re-evaluated.
This re-evaluation must include Hartsville Nuclear Plants (HTN), Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant (PBN), and YCN because these canceled 4
nuclear plants are potential material suppliers to the other TVA sites.
VIII.
ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Concerns Printout (Identifies relationship to Nuclear Safety and Generic Applicability)
PAGE 4
rut! TIME - 10:33:44 RUll DATE - 10/31/86 d
N 2
REFEREllCE SECTI0tl 3 M
M CATEGORY - MC SUBCATEGORY - 407 y
- o..<
S..n i-E,^m g~ :3
?EE 2" 7 M*
- g?"
m REFEREllCE
- ECPSI51J-ECPSI31C TEllllESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
- % i f >% 9 H
O 7 $n u8 "o
FREQUENCY
- REQUEST OFFICE OF !!UCLEt.R PDHER OllP - ISSS - Rlut EMPLOYEE C0tlCERN PROGRAM SYSTEM (ECPS)*
LIST OF EllPLOYEE CollCERN INFORMATION
= QFk
- r E CATEGORY: MC ADEQUACY OF MATERIAL SUBCATEGORY: 407 PROCEDURAL CollIROL
%8 e
u C"
7 48O GEllERIC y io
- APPL QTC/NSRS,
PA w
- s ft Q Cat!CERN SUB PLT BBSH INVESTIGATI0tt S
COIICERN g
IlullBER CAT CAT
- .0C FLQB REPORT R
DESCRIPTI0li o
!! Il N Y (ERT)
SS MATERI ALS PERS0!IllEL 110T GIVEll All DPP ORTUNITY TO VERIFY HHETHER OR fl0T DE T50056 REPORT Interi n Repott FECTIVE MATERIAL HAD BEEli RECEIVED 0 n
No. XX-85-027-X04.
N SITE FROM A CERTAIII 11AllUFACTURER.
(llAME KNDHN) A REPORT TO KIIDXVILLE THAT THE MATERIAL HAS 130T Dil SITE HA S MADE HITHOUT INPUT FROM MATERIALS P ERS0tlN EL.
110 FURTHER IllFORMATIONIS y
y Q
AVAILABLE.
g g
g n
CutlCERNS ARE GROUPED BY FIRST 3 DIGITS OF SUBCATEGORY NUMBER.
o z
N z
5 en
- o
- PSR Codes:.
g NS-Nuclear Safety-Related
- SS-Nuclear Saf ety Significant u
o NO-Not Nuclear Safety-Related i
S*o' t,
t!
- Tva 6c tos+6H (onwas sa
'emTEo irrATES GOVERNMENT T25 8 7 0 5 0 5
>912 Memorandum TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY TO J. R. Inger, CEG-H. Material Control Employee Concerns Tast Group, ONP, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant FROM W. R. Brown, Jr., Program Manager, Employee Concerns Tast Group, ONP, Watts Bar Nuclear Plant DATE tt4Y 0 51937
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK GROUP (ECTG) -
ESCALATION OF MATERIAL PERSONNEL SEARCH FOR DEFECTIVE MATERIAL ISSUE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION
References:
1.
Memorandum from you to me dated March 27, 1987 (T25 870327 954) 2.
My memorandum to S. A. White dated March 27, 1987 (T25 870327 953) 3.
My memorandum to C. H. Fox, Jr., dated April 10, 1987 (T25 870410 819) 4.
Memorandum from S. A. White to me dated April 15, 1987 (A02 870414 027) 5.
Memorandum from T. J. Chiles to me dated April 27, 1987 (LO3 870427 800) 6.
Memorandum from T. J. Chiles to me dated April 27, 1987 (LO3 870428 802) (copy attached)
The purpose of this memorandum is to document my endorsement and approval of the attached corrective action plan and to briefly review recent developments that have brought us to where we are today.
Because of your difficulty in resolving the subject issue (obtaining a corrective action plan acceptable to the ECTG), you escalated the resolution of the issue to my level, reference 1.
I then escalated the issue to the Manager of Nuclear Power, reference 2.
As a result of your meeting on April 1, 1987 with Mr. White, Mr.
Fox, et al., you were directed by Mr. Fox to provide a list of
" bullets" or specific issues that would provide a basis to improve dialogue and to sharpen the issues. As a result the list of
" bullets" was transmitted, reference 3.
In reference 4, Mr. White returned the issue to me for further action and to resolve an existing communication problem, f,
L
2-J. R. Inger WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK GROUP (ECTG) - ESCALATION OF MATERIAL PERSONNEL SEARCH FOR DEFECTIVE MATERIAL ISSUE FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION On April 16, 1987 you, Mr. Chiles, et al., met to discuss and to resolve the issues transmitted in reference 3; however, a resolution was not achieved.
Mr. Chiles and Mr. McCloud then responded (reference 5) te the " bullets" that we transmitted.
On April 27, 1987 you and I met with Mr. McAnally, Mr. Chiles, et al., to further discuss and to resolve the issues. Findings of the ECTG report, previously recommended corrective action plans, and the contents of references 5 and 6 were discussed. The result is the attached corrective action plan (reference 6) which I endorse and approve for incorporation into ECTG element report 40709-SQN.
~
W7'R. Brown, Jr.
WRB:EMC Attachment ec RIMS, MR 4N 72A-C (Attachment retained by ECIG.)
H. L. Abercrombie, ONP, Sequoysh C. H. Fox, Jr., LP 6N 38A-C J. L. McAnally, A108 IOB, Watts Bar 5017T
. w bios.,csi tor-*p s asi
- c. vite 6 nnES covEi:xvExT LO 3 870428 802 Memorandum T1:NNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY TO W. R. Brown, Jr., Program Manager, Employee Concerns Task Group, ONP Watts Bar Nuclear Plant FROM T. J. Chiles, Assistant Manager, Materials and Procurement, LP 3N 166D-C DATE
- April 27, 1987
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT - EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK CROUP (ECTG) ELEMENT REPORT MC-40709-SQN - MATERIAL CONTROL CATEGORY This is in response to W. R. Brown's memorandum to W. T. Cottle dated December 17, 1986.
By this memorandum I am endorsing the Corrective Action Plan (CAP) attached to Corrective Action Tracking Document Nos. 40709-NSP-01-RO and 40709-SQN-01-RO.
This CAP is not a Sequoyah restart requirement.
T. J. Chiles CRM:KAC Attachment cc (Attachment):
RIMS, MR AN 72A-C (Re: T25 861217 932)
R. C. Denney, DSC-E, ONP, Sequoyah S. B. Fisher, LP SN 38A-C R. L. Gridley, LP SN 157B-C C. R. McWherter, LP 3N 166D-C i
4-0602u h 2 '.' N \\f z..w = a=<.-n:a Grougj'1 i l
+ g-r,1; c. s I nwe
} D.45 3
[7ts/sv.
h i
i I
.,6 W* :
i 16 I
6 I
sto i
6
%'k(ha i
i aca j.
j
- I i
6 jba i
i 15 t4 t
1 i
i ke ?.P i
i j
I l
,___ l T AS g _ 15 75' t
idf*
f y
$ **},
Y/* {
- e..r __
- 'c
- N ' '.4 i&
ECY8 C.3 Atteehaent A Page 1 cf 1..
Revision 2 BCSP Corrective Action Tracking Document (CATD)
INITIATION Applicable ECSP toport No.: NC-40709-SON 1.
Immediate Corrective Action Requiref: [Yes O No 2.
Stop Work. Recommended: 0 Yes Ef No 3.
CATD No. 40709-NPS-01-R0 4.
INITIATION DATE 11-16-86 5.
RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATIO)l: Office of Nuclear Power 6.
PROBLEN DESCRIPTION: E QR O NQR TVA's response to NRC for IRB 83-07 is inadequate in that it did not contain the identifi-cation of all Ray Miller, Inc., material installed in safety-related systems along with its safety-significance evaluation and the disposition of all Ray Miller Inc., material that remained in stock.
This evaluation is determined generic to Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Bellefonte Nuclear Plant. Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, and Watts Bar Nuclear Plant due to the fact that TVA's response to' IEB 83-07 is in error and must be re-evaluated.
This re-evaluation must include Hartsville Nuclear Plants. Phipps Bend Nuclear Plant, and Yellow Creet Nuclear Plant because these canceled nuclear plants are potential material suppliers to the other TVA sites.
M a /
, O ATTACHMENTS 7.
PREPARED BY:
NAME /h6 /BLkM/n/r*2m M DATE: N//r /Pt 8.
CONCURRENCE:
CEG-ji C # $ e _ '
DATE: ////MS 4"
h.,
9.
APPROVAL: ECTG PROGRAM NGif.
4 // 6 / //a M !
DATE: //-/4-8(a
,p-CORRECTIVE ACTION 10.
PROPOSED CORRECTITE ACTION PLAN:
See attached Correerive Action Plan.
O ATIACHEENTS 11.
PROPOSED BY:
DIRECTOR /NGE:
TM DATE:
e.//.2 7/F >
12.
CONCURRENCE: CEG-H:
DATE:
SEP:
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
ECTG PROGRAK NGR:
DATE:
YERIFICATION AND CLOSEOUT 13.
Approved corrective actions have been verified as satisfactorily implemented.
SIGNATURE IITLE DAIE 2580T
T
-j,,.
C
". 2
.- w.
Page 1 of 1 Revision 2 ECSP Corrective Action Tracting Document (CATD)
INITIATION foolicable ECSP Report No: MC-40709-SON 1.
Insnediate Corrective Action Requiref:
Yes O No 2
Stop Work Reconsnended: O Tes Gr No 3.
CAID No. 40709-SON-01-R0 4
INITIATION DATE 11-5-86 5.
RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATIOJI:
SON Site l
6.
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION: GfQR O NQR TVA's response to NRC for IEB 83-07 is inadeauste in that it did not contain the identifi-cation of all Ray Miller, Inc., material installed in safety-related systems along with its safety-significance 9 valuation and the disposition of all Ray Miller, Inc., material that remained in stock.
_ O ATTACHMENTS 7.
PREPARED BI: NAME M/4MrMez/.f *#*A / A_ )fDATE: // /4 /9A 8.
CONCURRENCE: CEG
-nfC/L ' /
I
."M 'DATE: ///(c/h(,
9.
APPROVAL: ECTG PROGR'AM MGR./ 9fv#t2c4WM -t6e, DATE: ///d/f&
~
CORRECTIVE ACTION 10.
PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN:
See attached Corrective Action Plan.
O ATTACHMENTS 11.
PROPOSED BI: DIRECTOR /MGR:
/ Ch DATE:
N /A. 7 /fQ 12.
CONCURRENCE: CEG-H:
DATE:
SRP:
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
DATE:
ECTG PROGRAM MGR:
DATE:
VERIFICATION AND CLOSEOUT 13.
Approved corrective actions have been verified as satisfactorily implemented.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE 2154T
r-
. L _ __ :. _
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN (CAP)
REPORT MC-40709-SQN-11 f
" Material Personnel-Search for Defective Material" CAQR No, CH5870013 is attached to ensure that the TVA Nuclear Safety and Licensing Staff performs a thoroughly documented evaluation of TVA's past actions relative to IEB-83-07 regarding Ray Miller material. The evaluation will address, but will not be limited to, the following:
"o Activities for all TVA plants, including cancelled plants, relative to information requested in IEB-83-07.
Identification of material installed in safety-related o
systems, along with safety significance, Disposition of all Ray Miller material that remained in stock.
o Specific problems identified in the ECTG Report.
o Any deficiencies identified as a result of the evaluation will result in a CAQR to ensure that a letter will be written to the NRC advising them that the previous response was in error, and that a revised response will be prepared and issued to the NRC.
All corrective actions will be verified complete by July 30, 1987.
0322u I
_ _ _. - ~
SHEETTOF
~ ~ - - - ---
....,u CAQR...
- e. _,, 7
...-... = v.
o RIMS ACCESSION NUMBER 3mL 16 s'7 0 3 2 4 9 61 SAOR NO.lcinisl gly lojojmj ;
PART A DESCRIPTION OF THE CAO PLANT /PRQJECT All UNIT All VENDOR 4//A SYSTEM A//A VENDOR'S ADDRESS A//A COuPONENT A'/S 4'/#
CONTRACT NO.
ASME7 YES O NO @
REFERENCES IEB 83-07 ECTG Element Report m.-.v, v y o w..
REQUIREMENT VIOLATED SOURCE OF REOutREMENT VIOLATED DESCRIPTION OF CONDITION As a result of the ECTG investigation documented in Element Report MC-40709-SQN, the adequacy of TVA's response to IEB 83-07 is in question.
RECOMMENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION (OPTIONAL)
CAOR INITIATED BY -
DATE S~M4'- 8 7 TEL.NO.
.5301-C INITI ATOR*S ORG ANC ATION Mat. & Proc. Svs. Staff DATE/TiuE CAO clSCOVERED 3-b7 M ANAGEMENT REVIEWEPL, d/kMM
- DATE 3 - D' ' 9 7 Mgr. Planning 6 TITLE RESPONSIBLE ORGANC ATION Nuclear Safety & Licensing Staff Financial statt POTENTIAL AFFECT OR OPERABILITY BFN 10.20 30 COuuONO SON 10 20 couuCND OPERABILITY OF NUCLEAR UNIT IS O IS NOTOAFFECTED.
IF *YES* INDICATE AFFECTED UNITS.
WBN 10 20 COuuCN O BLN 10 20 couuCN D CAQ COORDINATOR DATE RECEIVED 3/2MN S/24./ 67 7// ' k k DATE 3/ 4 /8'7 PROCESSED BY a
TRENDING CODES DISTRIB UTION sat
- rn ! 'J uil.LJ
- actwr, is
- u. t
- e e PLANT ORG ANC ATION/MGR.
,Bd BLISOIwl
- ctw otse.ietics, en L1,,,.!
a L.LJ eoet c ma L ' J DNoA. Den OtStTE DIR.
1010 'OiO DNE., Dra OlpuO IOlO DiC
...e^!
' I t I ca.rst cas. en f ' ' I us f ' ' i DN OtR OtSITE OA IDIOlDIO s we. ta =t.
u rt e : tion ent e s acca r**
- g. t
- - J - !,v=, 't-ti-!'8
' ' ' ' ' l - LJ DNS. DIR DIDNE-PE
!OlOlOlO t
lDNSL. DIR DIDNO-CE 10:01010 n.=t
., _ t,umisanto,u c, Nsne DiDuc-uoD en OfOid
.,o c, s,,t aoon e s s....
u',,3, ' ' ' "
e s
t.
ON i OP M-eeoctows vaatto I'I''''
RIMS
@lNRC RES lOlMIDin
,f
..v..etu..e t
- t
. ORIGIN ATOR- '
... u.,
OTNER l
TVA 19564 (ONP 1-87) i
1 r
- - ~ ~ -
%, 2 gy g
__(fQg m
{
y RIMS ACCESSION NUMBER D L 1687032496 lu $on no.iejyisig;giojd,i,i i ! ;
' PART B EVALUATION AFFECT ON OPERABILITY DOES THIS CAO IMPACT UNIT OPERABILITY 7 YES O NO O IF *YES* NOTIFIED PLT. MGR. AND/OR OPERATIONS AT ON SIGNIFICANCE /REPORTABILITY SIGNIFIOANT CAO REPORTABILITY REVIEWED BY DATE PORS YES O NOO YESO NO O RESPONSIBLE ORG ANIZ ATION YES O NO O YESO NO O IF REPORTABILITY BLOCK IS CHECKED 'YES* IN ITEM 3B, GIVE A COPY TO THE ORGANIZ ATION AESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINING REPORTABILITY IMMEDIATELY! SENT TO DATE TIMr GENERIC REVIEW A REVIEW FOR POTENTIAL GENERIC IMPLICATIONS IS O IS NOT O REOUIRED.
EVALUATED BY (ALWAYS REQUIRED FOR SIGNIFIOANT CAQ'S AND CAO'S AFFECTING OPERABILITY)
OOPY OF CAOR SENT TO ON FOR NAME DATE CERFORMANCE OF A GENERIC REVIEW, ROOT CAUSE AN ALYSIS/ RECURRENCE CONTROL OHG AN42 ATion ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS REQUIRED 7 YES O NO O APPROVED BY REOURRENOE CONTROL REQUIRED 7 YESO NO O I AtwAYS REQUIRED FOR SIGNIFICANT CAO'S, NRO VIOLATIONS, AUDIT FINDINGS CAO'S NAME DATE AFFECTING OPER ABluTY. )
IF EITHER ARE RECUIRED FILL OUT PART D OF THIS CAOR.
tit LE iPART C REMEDI AL CORRECTIVE ACTION '
DISPOSITION METHOD DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED DISPOSITION RETURN TO VENDOR O Th< Nuclear Safety and Licensing Staff will perform and
=EwCRk O REPAIR C document an evaluation of TVA's past actions relative to ACCEeT-As-tS O SCRAP O IIEB 83-07.
Specific concerns identified in the ECTC report OTHER IDESCRIBE) O _
will also be addressed by the evaluation.
OTHER INFORM ATION NO TAGS PLACED REPAlk/ REWORK Ph00EDur4E NO.
WAS ENGINEERING RECWT llQgED YES O_ NO O ORGAN RESPONSIBLE FOR C/A Nuclear Saferv & Licens:.nc na:I l
[dTtN_ ON Ns
_NO O"E '"l SOHEDULED COMPLETION DATE I4 " A 7 O
VERIFIOATION RETEST Ol REINSPECT C l AUDITOR FOLLOW-UP O lOA REVIEW D lSUPV REVIEW D I
REQUIREMENTS OTHER IDESORIBElO 9
j APPROVALS l
NAME l DATE l l DATE APPROVE NAME f.
- HOPOSED BY l
l l
l lSUPV. APPROVAL l
l l
l PORO REVIEW DATE bHE/DNS APPROVAL l
l l-l AI A AOCEPTANCE l
l l
l PLANT MANAGER DATE OA A P P R OV AL 6
6 l
l I
ICTHER APPROVAL l
l l
RIMS ACOESSION NO.
VERIFICATION OF REMEDI AL C/ A I
NAME I
DATE APPROVED CORRECTIVE ACTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND IS READY FOR VERIFICATION
)
VERIFICATION COMPLETE l/
I AU. TAGS REMOVED l
i OADR SHEET t CLOSED
/
l l
/
RIMS ACCESSION NUM t
l TVA 19584 (ONP-1-87)
.(*
SHEET 3 OF 3~
5
~m.-
~
_.CAOR aEv. o RIMS'A00ESSION NUMBERM i 6 g 7 0 3 2 TT61.. OOR NO.lcluislal11ddi131 ! l l t PART D ROOT CAUSE AN ALYSIS/ RECURRENCE CONTROL ROOT..CAUSE OF THE CAQ PROPOSED RECURRENCE CONTROL ACTIONS
, l-i DRGANIZ ATION RESPONSIBLE FOR RECURRENCE CONTROL 4
l ;
SCHEDULED COMPLETION DATE VERIFICATION ISUPERVISOR REVIEW OlOC INSPECTION OITEST Di AuolTOa PottowUa O IOA Review 0 REQUIREMENTS iOTHER (DESCRIBE) O i
APPROVALS I
NAuf I DATE i NAME i OATE APPHQvAL l
l r!.OPOSED BY I
I l.
SUPV APPROVAL l
l l
PORC REVIEW D AT E Ll DNE DN S ^' "
PLANT MAN AGER DATE 1
9 ova I
OTHER APPROV AL l l
l RIM b ACCE SSION NO.
VERIFICATION OF RECURRENCE CONTROL 1
NAME DATE APPROVED REOURRENCE CONTROL i
COMPLETE-RE ADY FOR VERIFICATION VE RIFIC ATION
/
CAOR SHEET 3 CLOSED y
RIMS ACCESSION NUMBER TVA 19584 (ONP-1-87)
,1 f'
-, -