ML20212R191

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of FEMA Findings Re State of Mi & Local Emergency Response Plans.Fema Concludes That State of Mi & Local Plans & Preparedness Adequate for Facility
ML20212R191
Person / Time
Site: Fermi DTE Energy icon.png
Issue date: 04/17/1987
From: Shafer W
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To: Sylvia B
DETROIT EDISON CO.
References
NUDOCS 8704240340
Download: ML20212R191 (2)


Text

-.

a -

APR 171987 Docket No. 50-341 The Detroit Edison Company ATTN: B. Ralph Sylvia Group Vice President huclear Operations 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, MI 48166 Gentlemen:

This is to inform you of our receipt of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) findings regarding the State of Michigan's emergency response plan as well as associated local plans related to the Femi Nuclear Power Plant. These plans have been reviewed by FEMA Region V and the FEMA Headquarters. The FEMA overall evaluation was that the State and local plans and preparedness for the Fermi Nuclear Power Plant are adequate to protect the health and safety of the public in that there is reasonable assurance that the appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological emergency. A copy of the letter dated March 9,1987, from Mr. Dave McLoughlin, Deputy Associate Director, State and local Programs and Support, FEMA to Mr. Victor Stello, Jr., Executive Director for Operations, U. S. Nuclear Pegulatory Commission is enclosed for your infomation.

The enclosed letter also notes FEMA's previous approval of the public alert and notification system.

If you have any questions concerning this letter, , ease contact Mr. J. Foster of my staff of (317) 790-5655.

Sincerely,

" Original signed by W.D. Shafer*

W. D. Shafer, Chief Emergency Preparedness and Radiological Protection Branch

Enclosure:

As stated See Attached Distribution 8704240340 870417 PDR ADOCK 05000341 F PDR PIII RTi R/Id I k RIIls e

kn1 pen

+b Foster /ib ff~\

Gro r Lfj f S'

& I y/ r"

The Detroit Edison Company 2 APR 171987 Distribution cc w/ enclosure:

F. H. Sondgeroth, Licensing Engineer P. A. Marquardt, Corporate Legal Department DCS/RSB (RIDS)

Licensing Fee Management Branch Resident Inspector, RIII Ronald Callen Michigan Public Service Commission Harry H. Voight, Esq.

Fuclear Facilities and Environmental Monitoring Section Monroe County Office of Civil Preparedness D. Matthews, EPB W. Weaver, FEMA, RV l

1

ons

<) f- . .

Poe w .m.

.i s i j

( Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C. 20472 .

Taylor Cys: Stello Roe Mt 9lgt r.ehm Zerbe Denton BDavis Mr. Victor Stello, Jr. Murray Executive Director for Operations U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Ccrmtission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Mr. Stello:

In accordance with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) rule 44 CFR 350, the State of Michigan sutmitted its State and associated local plans for radiological emergencies related to the Enrico Fermi Atcnic Power Plant, Unit II, to the Regional Director of FEMA Region V for FEMA review and approval. The Regional Director completed and forwarded his final evaluation of the Michigan State and local plans to me on May 5, 1986, in accordance with section 350.11 of the rule. Contained in the May 5,1986 evaluation by the Regional Director is a review of full scale exercises conducted February 2-3, 1982 and June 26-27,1984; and, a repott on the public meeting held on April 28, 1982, which explained the site-specific aspects of the State and local plans. In addition, FEMA Region V is evaluating a partial exercise conducted on October 22, 1986, and preliminary reports indicate that there were no deficiencies.

Based on NUREG-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev.1, I find and determine that the State and local plans and preparedness for the Enrico Fermi Atomic Power Plant are adequate to protect the health and safety of tha public in that there is reasonable assurance that the appropriate protective measures can be taken offsite in the event of a radiological emergency. The public alert and notification (A&N) system is in place, operational and was approved on November 28, 1984 through FEMA's verification of the A&N system in accordance with the criteria of Appendix 3 of NUREI;-0654/ FEMA-REP-1, Rev.1; and, FEMA-REP-43,

" Standard Guide for the Evaluation of Alert and Notification Systems for Nuclear Power Plants" (now published as FEMA-REP-10).

If you have any questions, please contact Robert S. Wilkerson, Chief, Division of Technological Hazards, 646-2860.

Sincerely, Dave McTeughlin Deputy Associate Director State and Incal Programs and Support g ry y L O([] WlY