ML20212N218
| ML20212N218 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Clinton |
| Issue date: | 01/22/1987 |
| From: | Butler W Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Spangenberg F ILLINOIS POWER CO. |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8701300369 | |
| Download: ML20212N218 (5) | |
Text
o-DISTRIBUTION January 22, 1987 EWeEEFITe-LKintner Docket No. 50-461 NRC PDR ~'
M0'Erien LPDR ACRS(10)
PD#4 Rdg.
EMarinos RBernero HLi
. Mr. Frank A. Spangenberg Pirfo,0GC Manager-Licensing and Safety EJordan Clinton Power Station BGrimes P. O. Box 678 JPartlow Mail Code V920 NThompson Clinton, Illinois 61727 BSiegel
Dear Mr. Spangenberg:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI) RELATED TO ATWS REVIEW FOR CLINTON POWER STATION By "U-600279, Forwards Response to 10CFR50.62 Requirements Re Reduction of ATWS Events for Light Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants. Installation of ATWS Sys Complete.Tech Spec 3/4.1.5, [[system" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. Sys, Will Be Revised|letter dated October 16, 1985]] you provided information related to imple-mentation of the ATWS rule requirements for Clinton Power Station. The staff has reviewed your submittal for compliance with the requirements 10 CFR 50.62 and determined that additional information, identified in the enclosed RAI, is required for the staff to complete its review.
It is requested that the information be provided by March 10, 1987.
If you have any questions related to the enclosure or cannot meet the proposed submittal'date please contact the staff's project manager for your application, Byron Siegel at (301) 492-9474.
Sincerely,
/s/
Walter R. Butler, Director BWR Project Directorate No. 4 Division of BWR Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page i
I PDf4/PM PDf4/D BSiegel:lb WButler W f /w/87 3/p/87 8701300369 870122 i
PDR ADOCK 05000461 P
1 a nam o
UNITED STATES
[}%( ((gg NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
% [,'(, #
January 22, 1987 Docket No. 50-461 Mr. Frank A. Spangenberg Manager-Licensing and Safety Clinton Power Station P. O. Box 678 Mail Code V920 Clinton, Illinois 61727
Dear Mr. Spangenberg:
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (RAI) RELATED TO ATW FOR CLINTON POWER STATION By "U-600279, Forwards Response to 10CFR50.62 Requirements Re Reduction of ATWS Events for Light Water Cooled Nuclear Power Plants. Installation of ATWS Sys Complete.Tech Spec 3/4.1.5, [[system" contains a listed "[" character as part of the property label and has therefore been classified as invalid. Sys, Will Be Revised|letter dated October 16, 1985]] you provided information related to imple-mentation of the ATWS rule requirements for Clinton Power Station.
The staff has reviewed your submittal for compliance with the requirements 10 CFR 50.62 and determined that additional information, identified in the enclosed RAI, is required for the staff to complete its review.
It is requested that the information be provided by March 10, 1987.
If you have any questions related to the enclosure or cannot meet the proposed submittal date please contact the staff's project manager for your application, Byron Siegel at (301) 492-9474.
t Sincerely, t/
Walter R. Butler, Director BWR Project Directorate No. 4 Division of BWR Licensing
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ enclosure:
See next page
s Mr. Frank A. Spangenberg Clinton Power Station Illinois Power Company Unit 1 CC*
Mark Jason Mr. R. C. Heider Assistant Attorney General Project Manager Public Utilities Division Sargent & Lundy Engineers Office of the Attorney General 55 East Monroe Street State of Illinois Center Chicago, Illinois 60603 100 West Randolph Street - 12th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60601 Mr. L. Larson Project Manager Mr. D. P. Hall Vice President General Electric Company 175 Curtner Avenue, N/C 395 Clinton Power Station San Jose, California 95125 P. O. Box 678 Clinton, Illinois, 61727 Regional Administrator, Region III 799 Roosevelt Road Mr. John Greene Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137 Manager-Nuclear Station Engineering Dpt.
Clinton Power Station Richard B. Hubbard P. O. Box 678 Vice President Clinton, Illinois 61727 Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue - Su~ite K Sheldon Zabel, Esquire-San Jose, California 95125 Schiff, Hardin & Waite 7200 Sears Tower 233 Wacker Drive Chairman of Dewitt County c/o County Clerk's Office Chicago, Illinois 60606 DeWitt County Courthouse Clinton, Illinois 61727 Resident Inspector i
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety RR 3, Box 229 A Division of Er.gineering Clinton, Illinois 61727 1035 Outer Park Drive, 5th Floor Springfield, Illinois 62704 i
Enclosure REOUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON ATWS REVIEW The information provided in your submittal dated October the re 16, 1985, " Meeting (ATWS)quirements for Reduction of Risk of Anticipated Transients Without Scram Events," is not sufficient for the staff to determine that the Clinton design is in compliance with the Comission's regulations.
Provide the following design information as supporting doci: mentation of your method of compliance with 10 CFR 50.62:
1.
The documentation to describe the analysis and/or tests to verify that the Alternate Rod Injection (API) system function time will begin within 15 seconds and be completed within 25 seconds from ARI initiation.
2.
The electrical functional diagrams for the ARI system from the sensors to the solenoid coil of the ARI valves including documentation that the ARI system has redur. dant scram air header exhaust valves which are independent from the backup scram valves.
3.
The electrical one line diagram to demonstrate the electrical indepen-dence between the ARI system and the reactor trip system (RTS).
4.
The qualification information on isolation devices:
For the type of device used to accomplish electrical isolation, a.
describe the specific testing performed to demonstrate that the device is acceptable for its application (s).
This description should include elementary diagrams when necessary to indicate the test configuration and how the maximum credible faults were applied to the devices.
b.
Data to verify that the maximum credible faults applied during the test were the maximum voltage / current to which the device could be exposed.
In addition define how the maximum voltage / current was detemined, Data to verify that the maximum credible fault was applied to the c.
output of the device in the transverse mode (between signal and return) and other faults were considered (i.e., open and short circuits).
d.
Define the pass / fail acceptance criteria for each type of device, Provide a comitment that the isolation devices comply with the e.
environment qualifications (10 CFR 50.49) and with the seismic qualifications which were the basis for plant licensing.
f.
Provide a description of the measures taken to protect the safety systems from electrical interference (i.e., Electrostatic Coupling, EMI, Common Mode and Crosstalk) that may be generated by the ATWS circuits.
[
M9*Sy6%a g
, Provide information to verify that the Class IE isolator is powered g.
from a Class IE source.
5.
The proposed plant technical specification for AP,I function time and the ARI system components.
(Similar to the RPT system in current Tech. Spec.)
6 The information readout to the control room operator for the ARI and the RPT systems.
7.
Describe the system design to permit maintenance repairs and test or calibration of the system logic, e --
.