ML20212N107
| ML20212N107 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1987 |
| From: | Pate R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Mazur D WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212N112 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8703120362 | |
| Download: ML20212N107 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000508/1986013
Text
--
-- -- - ---
.
.
.
s
.
i
fEB 201937
Docket No. 50-508
Washington Public Power Supply System
P. O. Box 968
3000 George Washington Way
Richland, Washington 99352
Attention: Mr. D. W. Hazur
Managing Director
Gentlemen:
Subject: NRC Inspection - WNP-3
This refers to the routine inspection by Hessrs. A. D. Toth and C. G. Bruch on
December 8 - 19, 1986 of activities authorized by Construction Permit No. CPPR-154
and to the discussion of our findings held by Mr. Toth with Mr. H. Honopoli and
other members of your staff at the completion of the inspection, and with
(
Hr. Coody during subsequent telephone conferences on January 8, 12-13, 1987.
Areas examined during this inspection are described in the enclosed inspection
report. Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selective examinations
of procedures and representative records, interviews with personnel, and
observations by the inspectors.
Based on the results of this inspection, it appears that certain of your
activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC requirements, as set
forth in the Notice of Violation, enclosed herewith as Appendix A.
Your
response to this notice is to be submitted in accordance with the provisions of
10 CFR 2.201 as stated in Appendix A, Notice of Violation.
With respect to item 2 of the attachment, our inspection findings noted as-built
conditions which did not conform to revised design drawings.
In your reply
to this item, please discuss the method the Readiness Review Program will
implement to assure that construction changes have been accomplished in accordance
with such design revisions.
This inspection focused upon your implementation of the Construction Assurance
Program aspect of the Readiness Review Program described to us in your letter of
January 20, 1.86.
The enclosed inspection report identifica several weaknesses
in the implementation of your conunitments to this program. These weakncases
reflect upon the potential usefulness of the pending module report as an
integrated assessment of completed work. We recommend your careful consideration
of these matters, since results of this inspection will be considered in our final
assessment of your conduct of the Construct. ion Assurance Program Hodule,
0703120362 0702P6
PDH
ADUCK 0D000D00
.
g
PDP
l
k{
p.-
-
,
.
4
,
L
.
hEB 26 N5i
~
Mr. D. W.,Mazur
2
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.190(a), a copy of this letter and enclosure'will
be placed in the NRC public document room.
The responses directed by this letter and the attached notice are not subject
to the clearance procedure of the Office of Management and Budget as required
by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980, PL-96-511.
Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be glad to
discuss them with you.
Sincerely.
C,
9
'
e, r, e
h
Robert J. Pate, Chief
Reactor Safety Branch
Enclosures:
A.
D.
Inspection Report No. 50-508/86-13
cc w/ enclosures:
A. D. Kohler, WPPSS
R. B. Glasscock, WPPSS
L. J. Garvin, WPPSS
M. M. Monopoli, WPPSS
P. D. Olson, WPPSS, Elma, WA
State of WA.
bcc w/ enclosures:
RSB/ Document Control Desk (RIDS)
G. S. Lewis, IE
R. S. Lee, NRR
Project inspector
Resident inspector
G. Cook
D. Faulkenberry
J. Martin
bec w/o enclosure B:
LFMB
bec w/o enclosures:
M. Smith
Region V/ norma
~
]/itS T /[AiEST COPY ,
Rf.4tK5T CDPY ,
Rf.Q
OPE l[Iff0EST f,DTC~TfQUEST COPY ;
ryTES / NO
YES //N(1)
YES / NO
j
NO
_ DES // h0
U
(
5~
T0 PDF
F
4M.'44
g
h YE
/ _ NO
'
ADioth
$ARic)iards
RJP te
ADJ inson
ft
fee
2 hs/87
2./M/87
t//,87
A /) /87
/ /87
. - -
- -
. .