ML20212J700
| ML20212J700 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah  |
| Issue date: | 01/20/1987 |
| From: | Mcdonald J TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | Harold Denton NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM), Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20212J703 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8701280274 | |
| Download: ML20212J700 (11) | |
Text
i TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Watts Bar Nuclear Plant P. O. Box 800 l
Spring City. Tennessee 37381 January 20, 1987 Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention:
Mr. Harold Denton, Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation In the Matter of the Application of
)
Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority
)
50-328 EMPLOYEE CONCERNS TASK GROUP (ECTG) provides a listing of the report numbers, the related employee concords, and the previous submittal dates if applicable. To assist you in your review of these reports, Enclosure 2 provides a comparison between the ECTG Writer's Guide recommended report format and the transmitted reports. As has been previously discussed with your staff, the welding reports addressing employee concerns have been left in the format used by the Weld Task Group. transmits the final element reports for 5 elements addressing Sequoyah Nuclear Plant employee concerns in the following categories:
Engineering
- 2 reports Operations
- 2 reports Welding
- 1 report As indicated by the report cover sheets, these reports have completed final review by the Senior Review Panel and the Employee Concern Task Group management. With these final reports, all employee concerns related to Sequoyah have been addressed for Operations Subcategory 30100, Nechanical Equipment Reliability / Design; and Operations Subcategory 30200, Electrical and Communication. Operations Subcategory 30800, Maintenance, was completed with the submittal dated January 9, 1987. This submittal completes the final element reports in the Operations Category.
Please telephone Martha Martin at (615) 365-3587 (Watts Bar) if you have any questions.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY 8N St J. A. Mcdonald Watts Bar Nuclear Plant Site Licensing Manager 8701280274 870120 I
PDR ADOCK 05000327 cc (See page 2.):
p PDR g(
An Equal Opportunity Employer
- _. -., _ _. _... _, _. _ -. ~ _ _ _ _ _ _. _...
?
2 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission cc (Enclosures):
Mr. James N. Taylor, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U.S, Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II Attn:
Mr. Gary Zech 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 Nr. B. J. Youngblood, Project Director PWR Project Directorate #4 Division of PWR Licensing - A U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Room 440, 5 Story Phillips Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Nr. B. D. Liaw, Branch Chief U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7920 Norfolk Avenue Room T-1132 Bethesda, Maryland 20814 3302T 4
-,------,c.
1 e
i ENCLOSURE 1 Page 1 of 1 SEQUOYAH EMPLOYEE ELEMENT REPORT CONCERN NUMBER ISSUE Engineering 22906*
IN-85-348-003 Water Quality Monitoring (Final)
System Effluent Control
- Element report added after 9/26/86.
NOTE: An initial report was not necessary. This will be the only submittal for 22906.
Engineering 22910*
BNP-QCP-10.35-18 Nercury Switches In Diesel (Final)
Generator Building
- Element report added after 9/25/86.
NOTE: An initial report was not necessary. This will be the only submittal for 22910.
Operations 30115
- IX-85-102-005 Hardware Not Properly (Final)
Identified
- Concern XX-85-102-005 added after 9/26/86.
NOTE: Initial report transmitted 11/12/86.
Operations 30201 NAS-85-002 Possible Lack of Water-(Final)
NRS-85-006 tight Conduit and Connections TAK-85-001 NOTE: Initial report transmitted 10/21/86.
Welding XX-85-100-001 XX-85-100-001 (50800)* Improperly Repaired Welds (Final)
- Data base subcategory as shown in 9/26/86 printout.
NOTE: An initial report was not necessary. This will be the only submittal for Welding XX-85-100-001.
3302T
I e
1 ENGINEERING CATEGORY Enclcsure 2 Page 1 of 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE ELEMENT REPORT FORMAT 1.0 Issue 1.
Characterization of Issue (s)
Characterization 2.0 Summary 9.
Discussion,. Findings and Conclusions 3.0 Evaluators Cover Sheet Information 4.0 Evaluation 8.
Evaluation Process Process
5.0 Findings
9.
Discussion, Findings, and Conclusions 6.0 Root Cause (Collective Significance)n H Overall Root Cause will not be considered at this report level.
7.0 Attachments /
Attachments as required List of Concerns Other items included 2.
Have issue (s) been identified in Engineering Element in another systematic Reports analysis?
3.
Document nos., tag nos.,
locations or other specific descriptive identifications stated in element.
4.
Interview files reviewed 5.
Documents reviewed related to the element 1992T
ENGINEERING CATEGORY Enclssuro 2 Page 2 of 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE ELEMENT REPORT FORMAT Other items included in Engineering Element 6.
What regulations, licensing Reports commitments, design require-(cont'd) ments, or other apply or control in this area?
7.
List requests for information, meetings, telephone calls, and other discussions related to element.
1 1
OPERATIONS CATEGORT ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE OPERATIONS (OP) ELEMENT REPORTS NOTES /CONNENTS 1.0 Issue I.
Title The brief introduction Characterization Very brief introduction touches on the source of the concerns.
2.0 Summary I.
Title
- 1. The Conclusions are Very brief introduction towards the end of the findings.
III. Finding (Conclusions)
- 2. The Conclusions services as a summary of the findings.
3.0 Evaluators Cover Sheet
- 1. The printed name of the original evaluator (s) appears on the cover sheet.
- 2. The peer reviewer and CEG-H approval signa-tures are also on the cover sheet.
4.0 Evaluation II. Specific Evaluation Process Nethodology
5.0 Findings
III. Findings O
1880T
E clectra 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE OPERATIONS (OP) ELRENT REPORTS NOTES /CORRENTS-6.0 Root Cause IV. Root Cause
- 1. At the element level (Collective Significance) the Root Cause is often not identifible.
- 2. Collective significance is not addressed at the element report level.
7.0 Attachments /
II. Specific Evaluation
- 1. A list of the concerns List of Concerns Methodology with text are included within this section.
- 2. Other reports are sometimes attached.
l l
l e
O
Ecclsn ra 2 ECTG WRITER'S GUIDE NSRS/ERT*
WELD PROJECT (WP) REPORTS NOTES /CONNENTS 1.0 Issue Background Info Issues Addressed Characterization (Section I)
By Concerns (Section II)
'l 4
2.0 List Of Concerns Background Info Scope of Evaluation (Section I)
(Section I and Att-1) i 3.0 Evaluators Coversheet Coversheet i
I j
4.0 Evaluation Scope Not Delineated As Part Process (Section II)
Of The WP Reports however it is addressed as part of the
}
Weld Projects Program Manual
5.0 Findings
Findings Validity or (Section III)
Substantiation l
(Section III)
I
'l I
6.0 Root Cause" Conclusion and Validity or
- Note that recommendations are not included in element reports under the current ECTG program, and Conclusion Recommendations Substantiation Overall Root Cause will (Section IV)***
(Section III) not be considered at this report level.
i
'The Weld Project has endorsed a number of ERT Reports
)
and general issue level reports as adequately addressing the concerns at this level for SQN.
i I
w.
I 4