ML20212B195

Forwards Request for Addl Info to Complete Evaluation of Rev 9 to Topical QA Rept (Fpltqar 1-76A) Per 10CFR50.54(a)

ML20212B195
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie, Turkey Point, 05000000
Issue date:	07/21/1986
From:	Reyes L NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:	Woody C FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
References
NUDOCS 8608060254
Download: ML20212B195 (4)

Text

hY f h)

U l

July 21, 1986 Florida Power and Light Company ATTN: Mr. C. O. Woody Group Vice President Nuclear Energy Department P. O. Box 14000 Juno Beach, FL 33408 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

FP&L TOPICAL QA PROGRAM UPDATE Your letter dated June Assurance Report (FPLTQAR 1-76A), Revision 9, in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(a12,1986 This report provides the current quality assurance program description for Turkey Point and St. Lucie (Docket Nos. 50-250, 50-251, 50-335, and 50-389). We have reviewed your submittal and determined that additional information is needed to complete our evaluation of changes to the program.

Our request for additional information is enclosed. Please contact Mr. G. A. Belisle of this office on (404)331-5596 if you have questions regarding our request.

Sincerely, Original Signed by Luis A. Reyes Luis A. Reyes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Projects

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information

,cp w/ enc 1:

tec. M. Wethy, Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant

. . Baker, Plant Manager urkey Point Nuclear Plant

. Bladow, Plant QA Superintendent Arias, Jr., Regulatory and Compliance

, Supervisor V. N. Harris, Vice President St. Lucie Nuclear Plant (D(A. Sager,PlantManager Jg. Harper,SiteQASuperintendent i

8608060254 860721 O DR ADOCK 0000 , g zn/

6 Florida Power & Light Company 2 July 21, 1986 bec w/ enc 1:

NRC Resident Inspector Document Control Desk State of- Florida RII RII RI RIT f.a 1 rad gc Tau) iera RI[I Elrod MRunyan:bhg GBelisle J n P 7/in/86 7/1o/86 7 /86 7/[f/86 7//f /86 RIJ Verre111 7/jj/86

6 ENCLOSURE REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FP&L QA TOPICAL REPORT, REVISION 9

1. Section 1.2.3.2, page 9 of 27 (of Revision 9)

Within this section, the duties, responsibilities, and authorities of each manager in the Quality Assurance Department are delineated. In Revision 9, an exception was made for the Quality Assurance Systems and Audits Group.

Instead of assigning responsibility to an individual, the revised version assigns responsibility collectively to the group as a whole.

Explain the reason for this change.

2. Section 1.2.4, page 17 of 27 Revision 8 states that the QA Department has a representative assigned to each major project, who reports to the Director of Quality Assurance.

Revision 9 deletes this requirement.

Explain the basis for this deletion.

3. Section 2.2.2, page 4 of 7 Revision 8 states that quality instructions shall be reviewed by the Quality Assurance Department. Revision 9 states that these instructions shall be reviewed at each revision.

Explain the reason for adding "at each revision" to this statement and how it impacts other parameters governing the frequency of procedure review.

4. Section 2.2.4, page 5 of 7 Revision 9 deletes three responsibilities of the QA Department dealing with the coordination of the QA program, the Topical Report, and the review of quality instructions written by other groups.

Explain the basis for this deletion.

5. Section 2.2.5, page 6 of 7 Revision 9 removes the commitment for the QA Department to be responsible for the indoctrination of supervisory personnel. It also deletes requirements for department heads to indoctrinate non-supervisory personnel.

Explain the basis for this deletion.

2 i

1

6. Section 6.2.1, page 1 of 3 I Revision 8 states that quality procedures shall delineate the control measures for controlled documents including direction for the verification -

that changes are properly incorporated. Revision 9 changes the wording to l read " verification that changes are received." i I

Explain the reason for this wording change.

7. Section 7.2.3, page 3 of 3 Revision 8 lists six elements which shall be included in receiving L

. inspections. Revision 9 deletes one of these elements, dealing with 1 identifying, segregating, and handling nonconforming items.

Explain the basis for t.his deletion. l

8. Section 13.2.1 and 13.2.2, page 1 of 2 l The last paragraph of Section 13.2.1 and the entirety of Section 13.2.2, concerning the establishment of handling, storage, and shipping require-

ments, was deleted by Revision 9.

i Explain the basis for this deletion. 1

9. Section 17.2.1, page 1 of 2 Revision 8 contains a list of six elements which, as a minimum, inspection j and test records shall identify. This list is deleted by Revision 9.

'l j Explain the basis for this deletion.

I

10. Section 18.2.2, page 3 of 5 4 j In Revision 8 of this section, letter "c", the scope of audit activities includes the request for proposals and evaluation of bids. Revision 9 revised this commitment to require audits only of the evaluation of bids.

f Explain the basis for this change.

11. Section 18.2.5, page 5 of 5 i Revision 8 states that when implementation of corrective action cannot be l verified by other means, a reaudit of deficient areas shall be performed to j accomplish verification. Revision 9 deletes this requirement.

Explain the basis for this deletion.

l t