ML20211F711
| ML20211F711 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 10/23/1986 |
| From: | Andrews R OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | Sells D Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| LIC-86-515, NUDOCS 8610310233 | |
| Download: ML20211F711 (3) | |
Text
'
t Omaha Public Power District 1623 Harney Omaha. Nebraska 68102 2247 402/536 4000 October 23, 1986 LIC-86-515 Mr. D. E. Sells, NRC Project Manager PWR Project Directorate #8 Division of PWR Licensing - B U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
References:
1.
Docket No. 50-285 2.
Letter OPPD (R. L. Andrews) to NRC (J. R. Miller), dated April 1, 1985 (LIC-85-135) 3.
Letter OPPD (R. L. Andrews) to NRC (A. C. Thadani), dated January 28, 1986 (LIC-86-025) 4.
Letter OPPD (R. L. Andrews) to NRC (A. C. Thadani), dated July 23, 1986 (LIC-86-306)
Dear Mr. Sells:
Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR)
Labeling / Demarcation Study Status The purpose of this letter is to provide the current status of the DCRDR project.
The attachment to Reference 3 was a time line used to group all the remaining items of the DCRDR into one schedule.
Reference 4 was a revision to that schedule, changing the completion date for the labeling, demarcation, color coding and meter banding study to September 30, 1986.
The " study" phase was that time required to obtain the information necessary to complete the Human Factors Maintenance Plan.
This also corresponded to OPPD's contractor involvement which was completed on September 30, 1986.
Thus, we consider the
" study" completion date as being met.
The pre-implementation stage will now follow, with a planned completion date of February 1987.
Modifications associated with DCRDR implementation will follow.
i Attached is a summary status of the elements of the labeling / demarcation study, as defined in Reference 2.
Please note that the " Study" phase in the Reference 3 time line was revised in Reference 4 from June, 1986 to September 30, 1986.
The Pre-implementation phase completion date remained as February 1987 in both documents.
8610310233 861023 l
PDR ADOCK 05000285
[3 P
\\
- p. v f t men um,n rt opponorny
(
s Mr. D. E. Sells LIC-86-515 Page 2 Elements completed by our contractor were those elements necessary to complete the Human Factors Maintenance Plan (HFMP). The HFMP is on schedule and should be completed by November 15, 1986.
OPPD is evaluating the impact of control room design review on the proposed simulator. OPPD's resources can best be utilized by manufacturing new labels and mimics at the same time they are fabricated for the simulator. The tenta-tive schedule for control room implementation, as shown in Reference 3, is also under evaluation and cculd change as a result of this Design Review.
Our schedule remains to issue the final DCRDR Report in February 1987.
If you should have any questions concerning the labeling, demarcation, color coding or meter banding studies, please do not hesitate to call.
Sincerely, R. L. Andrews Division Manager Nuclear Production RLA/me cc: LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae 1333 New Hampshire Ave., N.W.
Washington, DC 20036 Mr. P. H. Harrell, NRC Senior Resident Inspector
[
J l
l l
r
I 6
ATTACHMENT Detailed Control Room Desian Review Summary Status October 1986 LABELING llEM STATUS 1.
Existing labels entered into DBMS Completed by OPPD 2.
Standard abbreviations developed Completed by Contractor 3.
Standard acronyms developed Completed by Contractor 4.
Functional descriptions added Completed by Contractor 5.
Hierarchical labeling developed Completed by Contractor 6.
NUREG-0700 Guidelines applied Completed by Contractor 7.
Paper labels implemented on mock-up Not yet completed by 0 PPD DEMARCATION llEM STATUS 1.
Listing of plant systems Completed by OPPD 2.
Outlining (demarcation) done on Not yet completed by 0 PPD mock-up 3.
Color padding assigned Completed by Contractor 4.
Outlined areas globally labeled Not yet completed by 0 PPD METER BANDING llEM STATUS 1.
Review existing meters for:
a) Normal operating range Not yet completed by 0 PPD b) Range constant across plant Not yet completed by 0 PPD modes 2.
Determine type and placement of Completed by Contractor bands COLOR CODING l
llEM STATUS 1.
Address colors used in C.R. for Completed by Contractor consistency
._