ML20211D714

Notice of Violation from Insp on 860414-21

ML20211D714
Person / Time
Site:	LaSalle
Issue date:	06/05/1986
From:	Paperiello C NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20211D706	List: IR 05000373/1986015 ML20211D702 ML20211D714
References
50-373-86-15, 50-374-86-16, NUDOCS 8606130135
Download: ML20211D714 (2)

Text

- __ - -_

I NOTICE OF VIOLATION Commonwealth Edison Company Docket No. 50-373 LaSalle County Station Docket No. 50-374 As a result of the inspection conducted on April 14-21, 1986, and in atcordance with the " General Policy and Procecures for NRC EnforcWent Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), tne following violatico was identified:

Technical Specification 6.2.A. requires that detailed written procedures including applicable chet.koff lists covering the applicable procedures reconsended 16 Appendix "A" of Regulatory Guide 1.33 Revision 2, February 1978, and suneillance end tes't requirements shall be adhered to.

A. Item 1.0 of Appendix A to Regulator Control (e.g., locking and tagging)y ." Guide 1.33LAP Procedure identifies " Equipment 900-4, revision 24, entitled Enuipment Out Of Service Procedure, requires all necessary Out-0f-Service Cards be placed on safety-related . equipment rcmoved from service in accordance with the Checklist.

Contary to the above, on March 19, 1986, the day shift EA hung the 00S card and de-energized a breaker that was not specified on tiie Ten.porary Lift Checklist.

B. Item 1.c of Appendix A to Regulatory Guidt! 1.33 Identifies procedores for Equipment Centrol (e.g., locking and tagging). Both Procedure LAP 1600-2., " Conduct of Operatort Protedure,' and LAP 900-4 require that a seccnd independent verification shall be made when placing safety-related equipment into or out of servics.

Contrary to the above, on March 19, 1986, a second verification of the 005 Card placement was not performed after placing the High Pressure Core Spray Suppression Pool Full Flow Test Valve motor operator breaker out of service.

C. Item 1.g of Appendix A to Regulatory Guide 1.33 identifies " Shift and <

Relief Turnover" as required procedures. Procedure LAP 200-3 requires that the oncoming Shift Engineer, oncoming Shift Control Room Engineer (SCRE)/ plant SRO, oncon.ing Shift Foreman, and offgoing Nuclear Station Operator (NS0) with the oncoming NSO shall perfom a visual control room panel check which shall include the status of safety-related systems (green board concept).

Contrary to the above, on the afternacn of March 19, 1986, the oncoming Shift Engineer, Shift Control Room Engineer, Shift Foreman, Nuclear Station Operator, and offgoing Nuclear Station Operator failed to determine the status of a safety-related system in that they failed to identify that the High Pressure Core Spray Suppression Pool Full Flow Test Valve was inoperable.

8606130135 860606 PDR ADOCK 05000373 G PDR

s i

NOTICE OF VIOLATION 2

0. Step F.33.f of Shift Surveillance procedure LOS-AA-S1 requires that the HPCS Full Flow Test to Suppression Pool valve, 1(2)E22-F023, be checked to indicate closed.

Controry to the above, on March 19, 1986, the afternoon shift NSO failed-to perform Step F.33.f of the procedure.

This is a $eyerity level IV viclation (Supplement 1).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201 you are required to submit to this office within thirty days of the date of this Notice a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation: (1)correctiveaction taken and the results achieved; (2) corrective action to be taken to avoid further violations; and (3) the date when full compliance will be achieved.

Cor. sideration n'ay be given to extending your response time for good cause shown,

/

3%

Dated /

'~

64 $1 Carl J./ Paper+To','liirector Division of Rhactor Safety