ML20210U495
| ML20210U495 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick  |
| Issue date: | 05/15/1986 |
| From: | Grace J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Utley E CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210U500 | List: |
| References | |
| TASK-3.D.3.4, TASK-TM EA-85-131, NUDOCS 8606020376 | |
| Download: ML20210U495 (3) | |
See also: IR 05000324/1986011
Text
.
A.ESkO
-
.
.
MAY 151986
,
Docket Nos. 50-325 and 50-324
License Nos. DPR-71 and DPR-62
EA 85-131
Carolinj Power and Light Company
ATTN: v E. E. Utley
Senior Executive Vice-President
Power Supply and Engineering
and Construction
P. O. Box 1551
Raleigh, NC 27602
Gentlemen:
As a result of an NRC inspection for Units 1 and 2 (50-325/84-31 and 50-324/84-31)
conducted October 15 through November 30, 1984, a Notice of Deviation was issued
to you on December 31, 1984, involving a discrepancy between the as-built
configuration of Brunswick, Units 1 and 2, and the FSAR with respect to chlorine
detectors designed to alarm in and automatically isolate the control room upon
detection of chlorine at the tank car siding. Our report identified that these
detectors did not function as described in the FSAR.
Subsequent to our identification of this deviation, we reviewed two reports
prepared by the NUS Corporation in which the configuration of the chlorine
detection system was described. These reports are NUS-3697, Control Room
Habitability Evaluation Brunswick Steam Electric Plant (NRC TMI Action Plan
Item III.D.3.4) dated December 1980 and a revision to the same report dated
February 1983. Both reports stated that "[d]etection of high chlorine
concentrations at the tank car siding or in the control room air intake will
alarm in and automatically isolate the control room."
In letters dated
December 30, 1980, and March 2,1983, your staff submitted these two reports as
official CP&L positions. Eecause the detectors at the tank car siding were not
operable and would not isolate the control room, your letter contained inaccurate
information. An investigation was conducted by the Office of Investigations (01)
(NRC Report of Investigation No. 2-85-002) for the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant,
Units 1 and 2 from December 28, 1984 through September 30, 1985. 01 concluded
that your submittal of the inaccurate information was not willful. A copy of
the synopsis of the 01 report was forwarded to you on January 22, 1986.
An Enforcement Conference on this matter was held on February 19, 1986
.
at the NRC's Region II Office,
j
l
8606020376 860515
ADOCK 05000324
G
j
i
D: Cl1 <
,
-
-
-
-
-
-
-- - -
.
.
8
Carolina Power and Light Company
2
IE6i' 1 5 [986
The NRC has decided that because the discrepancy between the as-built configuration
and the FSAR was already addressed in the December 31, 1984, Notice of Deviation,
no additional enforcement actions will be taken.
Your corrective actions
described at the February 19, 1986, Enforcement Conference will be examined
during future inspections.
Sincerely,
J,-Helson Grace
Regional Administrator
Enclosure:
Inspection Report Nos.
50-325/86-10 and
50-324/86-11 (Enforcement
Conference Summary)
cc:
P. W. Howe, Vice President
frunswickNuclearProject
C. R. Dietz, Plant General Manager
-
.
'
.
-
..
i
.
'
.
.,
.
-
MAY 151986
Carolina Power and Light Company
-3_
pistribution
F
/NRC Resident I ~3&
spector
/ Stat of Nor
Ca rolina
PDR
/
ECY
!
A
MTayl
RVoll
r, IE
v/JNGra e,
I
,AAxe rad,
TPo dexter IE
/JL berman, LD
E RI,ill,p
ordJnatyRV
orcemen
rs
RI I.1IV.
IE:ES
IE:ES
EDO Rdg File
\\
.
Y
(
E
9
Ik
xter
I
ace
J
berman
1:ad I
$/,/86
/,3/86
W/S/86
(A
4/
r
K
lor
VSt
o
tf /f/86
4 / ' /86
g
/{/86
- [////86
RII
R
RII
g
Reyes
GRJe kins R0ra ker
5/[f/86
05/ f/86
f
05/j /86
-
_.
.
. -
-__
..