ML20210R446
| ML20210R446 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 09/29/1986 |
| From: | FLORIDA POWER CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210R434 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8610070311 | |
| Download: ML20210R446 (247) | |
Text
g c
DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW SUPPLEMENT TO
SUMMARY
REPORT FOR CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 GENERATING STATION PREPARED FOR U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 29, 1986 FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION ST. PETERSBURG, FLORIDA l
B610070311 860930 !
PDR ADOCK 05000302 I P PDR j i
.x- - - . - , - - . . . , ., _ . , , , - , . _ -- , . . _ . - _ , - . _ . . . _ _ . ~ .-_,m__.
FOREWARD This report supplements the Florida Power Corporation (FPC) Detailed Control Room Design Review (DCRDR) Summary Report for Crystal River 3 submitted to the NRC on June 17, 1985. This DCRDR Supplemental Report provides FPC's responses to the concerns identified in the Evaulation Report of the FPC DCRDR Summary Report prepared by Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) for the NRC. The SAIC Evaluation Report was transmitted to FPC on September 6,1985.
Because of the length of time that has transpired between the submittal of the FPC DCRDR Sumary Report and this Supplemental Submittal to the Summary Report, FPC recommends that review of this document be prefaced by re-reading both the FPC DCRDR Sumary Report and the SAIC Evaluation Report of the Summary Report.
i Low (Foreward)DN51-2 l
4 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Purpose 1 1.3 Organization 2 2.0 NRC DCRDR CONCERNS 2
- 1. Qualifications and Structure of the DCRDR Team 2
- 2. Operating Experience Review 2
- 3. Control Room Survey 3
- 4. Systems Function and Task Analysis 4
- 5. Comparison of Display and Control Requirements 11 with Control Room Inventory
- 6. Validation of Control Room Functions 14 7 Assessment of HE0s 15
- 8. Selection of Design Improvements 18
- 9. Verification That Improvements Will Provide The 21 Necessary Corrections Without Introducing New HE0s
- 10. Coordination of the DCRDR with Other 25 l Improvement Programs l
- 11. Proposed Corrective Actions and Justification for 25 HEDs Left Uncorrected Low (Tb1 Cont)DN51-2 111
T ,
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd)
Page APPENDIX 1 27 (1) Task Analysis Worksheet Fields (Columns)
Definitions (2) Equipment Suitability Decision Process Flow Chart (3) HE0 Categorization Guidelines APPENDIX A 32 HE0s with Inadequate / Incomplete Corrections APPENDIX B 43 HE0s with Inadequate / Incomplete Justifications APPENDIX C 121 HEOs Requiring Further Study APPENDIX D 196 I
HE0s with no Implementation Date APPENDIX E 217 HE0s Revised by FPC Since Summary Report (Not Listed as Deficient in Evaluation Report)
Low (TblCont)DNSI-2 iv
a TABLE OF CONTENTS (Cont'd) l Page
! APPENDIX F HE0s Resulting From Additional SF&TA 237 Low (TblCont)DN51-2 v
SUPPLEMENT TO ;
DETAILED CONTROL ROOM DESIGN REVIEW
SUMMARY
REPORT FOR 4
, CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 GENERATING STATION ,
i i
1.0 INTRODUCTION
l i
1.1 BACKGROUND
f As required by NUREG-0737, Supplement 1, Florida Power Corpora-tion (FPC) submitted the Summary Report of the Detailed Controi i Room Design Review (DCRDR) conducted at FPC's Crystal River Unit 3 to the NRC on June 17, 1985. The FPC Summary Report was !
evaluated by the NRC Human Factors consultants, Science Applica- ;
tions International Corporation (SAIC), who prepared an Evalua- i i
i tion Report of the FPC DCRDR Summary Report. The SAIC Evaluation l
Report was transmitted to FPC on September 6,1985, and identi-
, 1 i fled numerous NRC concerns with the FPC Sumary Report. These 1 t
concerns were subsequently discussed with NRC and SAIC personnel
- 1 during a meeting in Bethesda, Maryland, on October 24, 1985.
1.2 PURPOSE i
t The purpose of this Supplement to the FPC Summary Report is to l
! provide the FPC response to the NRC concerns identified in the l l SAIC Evaluation Report. The FPC responses documented by this
! I
)
-- .. -,-r-_ --
-.,.w-,%,. .-,-em, _y--__,v.-, ~.__-.-.w.w__. . - - - ww - c.. -
Supplement are substantially the same as provided verbally during the October 24, 1985 meeting in Bethesda. The Human Engineering Observation (HEO) action / justification statements, which were identified as major deficiencies in the SAIC Evaluation Report, have been revised to incorporate descriptions of the detail design features to correct these HE0's developed since the October 24, 1985 meeting. Implementation schedules have been added to all HE0s for which a corrective action is specified.
1.3 ORGANIZATION Since the purpose of this Supplement to the FPC DCRDR Summary Report is to answer the NRC concerns identified in the SAIC Eval-uation Report, tne FPC responses will be referenced to the appro-priate paragraph in the CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS section of the Evaluation Report. In each case, the NRC concern will be stated followed by tne FPC response. Where the FPC Summary Report was found to be satisfactory, as documented in the SAIC l
Evaluation Report, it will be so noted.
l 2.0 NRC DCRDR CONCERNS 1
l 1. Qualifications and Structure of the DCRDR Team.
1 No concerns were noted in this area. l
- 2. Operating Experience Review l
No concerns were noted in this area.
- 3. Control Room Survey COMMENT The licensee needs to identify which NUREG-0700 criteria were modified or omitted from the survey process. If other criteria (such as NUTAC criteria) were substituted for NUREG-0700, the licensee should identify these criteria and provide justifications for the substitutions.
l
RESPONSE
When FPC initially began conducting the control room survey in the spring of 1983, INP0 had just issued a report that provided suggested changes to the NUREG-0700 control room survey approach. It was felt that the INP0 revisions to the survey approach were too extreme, i.e., some critical human factors items might be overlooked. The NRC later expressed a similar opinion. However, FPC did fina some useful suggestions for deleting redundant or inappropriate check-l list items. After FPC's consultant presented the concept of the proposed changes at an FPC and NRC meeting in Bethesda in April 1984, feedback was received from the NRC that led FPC to abandon any changes to the NUREG-0700 control room I
survey approach because there were no resources to defend all of the changes. For the checklists already completed, FPC went back and re-evaluated the relatively small number of items that had been deleted so that all NUREG-0700 check-list items were covered. For future checklist use, FPC will use the NUREG-0700 checklist verbatim. .
s
- 4. Systems Function and Task Analysis COMMENT i l
The licensee should expand the scope of the plant-specific Emergency Operating Procedures (EOPs) (Emergency Procedures (EPs), Abnormal Procedures (APs), and Verification Proce-dures (VPs)) so that all operator tasks specified in the CR3 E0Ps are subjected to the System Function & Task Analysis (SF8TA) and Verification & Validation (V&V) processes.
l
RESPONSE
1 FPC contracted with our human factors consultant, General Physics Corporation (GP), to expand the task analysis, as described in FPC's letter to the NRC dated June 17, 1985.
The purpose of this expanded task analysis was to cover the abnormal procedures and the scenarios listed below.
_4
n The additional work involved SF&TA and V8V for the following procedures:
EP-120 Inadequate Shutdown Valve EP-140 Emergency Reactivity Control VP-540 Runback Verification Procedure AP-241-AP-277 Response to Various Area and Process Radiation Monitor Alarms '
AP-360 Loss of Decay Heat Removal AP-450 Emergency Feedwater Actuation AP-530 Natural Circulation AP-770 Emergency Diesel Generator Actuation AP-1061 Loss of Containment Integrity This effort also included preparation of Operating Sequence Overvf ews (050) for the following scenarios: (1) Large Break
- Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) (Response to Challenge to Containment), (2) Interfacing System LOCA, (3) Response 'to l 1
the Release of Fission Products Outside containment, and (4) i Response to Multiple Equipment failures. !
The OS0s were initially used to verify the extent of l scenario involvement of the procedures listed above and to outline the expected operator responses during the scenario walkthroughs using the CR-3 Control Board mockup. Procedure steps not covered by the scenarios were walked through 1
l independent of a specific scenario context. The walk-throughs were conducted using CR-3 operations personnel and
~
the mockup in December, 1985. The walkthroughs were observed by GP human factors and FPC engineering personnel.
The mockup was updated for these walkthroughs to reflect the major design changes made during the Refuel V outage com-pleted in August 1985 by overlaying affected panel sections with the appropriate Computer Aided Design (CAD) drawings showing the revisions. Where the procedures required opera-tions at panel sections not included in the mockup (i.e.,
rear of Main Control Board), these steps were reviewed in the CR-3 Main Control Room at the actual panels. This effort resulted in the identification of five additional HE0s, numbers 0380 thru 0384.
COMMENT
~
The licensee should provide a description of the methods and processes used to: (A) identify parameters and other infor-mation and control needs that are not provided in the Antic-ipated Transient Operating Guidelines (ATOGs) or are different from those specified in the AT0Gs; (B) detennine the characteristics (e.g., units, range, accuracy, type of control / display) of the needed instrumentation; and (C) determine the differences, if any, between the task analysis approach used during development of the plant-specific EPs and APs and the task analysis used during the DCRDR process.
RESPONSE
Prior to addressing these comments, it must be understood that the CR-3 specific E0Ps are symptomatic type procedures in that they specify control actions to be taken or responses to be verified on a major component or system level but do not call out specific controls or instruments to be used. It is FPC's operating and training philosophy that determination of the best method to effect a control input or verify proper system response in a given situation should be left up to operator expertise. Therefore, it is FPC's opinion that the E0Ps are an excellent basis for com-pletion of the pre-fill portion of the task analysis work-sheets unbiased by existing control room equipment since, in most cases, required operations and expected responses are not specified in terms of specific controls or instruments.
(A) FPC does not feel that there is a requirement for a separate methodology for identification of information that may have been missed by the AT0G based procedures for the following reasons:
- 1) The ATOG based procedures were developed by Bab-cock & Wilcox (B&W) from a task analysis of all significant emergency operating scenarios known to date for a B&W reactor. FPC feels that this ef fort was comprehensive in identifying symptoms
that the operator will see and specifying responses. The methodology for this B&W AT0G task analysis was provided in the presentation made to the NRC in April 1984.
- 2) Since the CR-3 plant specific ATOG based E0Ps are symptomatic and not I&C specific in nature, the expertise of the individuals completing the pre-fill portion of the Task Analysis worksheets must ultimately be relied upon to provide the detailed specifications of control and instrument charac-teristics required to complete the tasks listed in the E0Ps. A similar level of expertise would have to be relied upon if a methodology separate from use of the ATOG based E0Ps were established to determine required Control Room characteristics.
(B) The characteristics of needed instrumentation were determined by the method described on pages 18-20 of the Summary Report. This method is outlined further in Appendix 1 of this report. A concern was expressed during the in-progress audit about the objectivity of the determination of information requi rements since many of the requirements were met exactly by Crystal River Unit 3 instrumentation. Again, it must be emphasized that the CR-3 E0Ps are symptomatic in nature and in most cases do not identify specific controls or
instruments to be used to accomplish a particular task. Therefore, the individuals completing the pre-fill portion of the Task Analysis worksheets (Columns 1 thru 5) were required to use their expertise along with the system descriptions contained in the CR-3 FSAR as references to interpret the general instructions in the E0Ps in terms of detailed instrument and control characteristics. Thus a requirement to adjust flow rate would be specified as a throttleable valve, a need to monitor trend would result in a recorder with an appropriate range being specified while a requirement to verify or maintain a setpoint within a specific tolerance would be specified as a meter with the appro-priate range and scale divisions.
The PWR Senior Reactor Operator (SR0) (from GP) who assisted in the initial task analysis (completion of the pre-fill portion of the Task Analysis worksheets) was licensed at Three Mile Island. This SR0 felt that the similarities between the two plants and his exten-sive knowledge of TMI led him to specify information requirements more exact than an SR0 licensed on-a more dissimilar PWR or a BWR might have specified. As a j result, FPC carefully reviewed the task analysis and concluded that while his knowledge may have led to specification of information requirements very close to what CR-3 has, his intimate knowledge of Babcock and
Wilcox plants had contributed to the project because he alerted the DCRDR team to human engineering observa-tions that a less expert operator would have missed.
Because of the concern expressed at the audit, another SR0 (from GP) licensed on a different plant (Davis ,
Besse) was selected to perform the additional task analysis work and further ensure objectivity.
C. For the task analysis performed during the DCRDR, the general instructions and response descriptions in the existing AT0G based EPs and APs were expanded signifi-cantly to include the detailed control and instrument characteristics required to complete the specified tasks. These ATOG based procedures were developed utilizing a previous task analysis which was performed with the objective of converting generic B&W guidelines for emergency plant operation into CR-3 specific proce-dures. This previous task analysis was completed prior to the start of the DCRDR and was done fcr a different purpose. The results of this task analysis were not organized in a fashion adequate to do a comparison.
m v rw- -, , es-e--,.---9 g - --am >- m-,--.i-., ,,.e---#- -
p .-, .w.e
- --s,r,--e----gwww- w<- -my-- -n
- 5. Comparison of Display and Control Requirements with Control Room Inventory COMMENT The licenses should complete the inventory process for all the controls and displays identified by the analysis of additional emergency scenarios required to complete the system function and task analysis.
RESPONSE
FPC assumes that " inventory process" means the same approach described in the Summary Report and past submittals to the NRC. GP developed Operating Sequence Overviews (050s) for the additional emergency scencrios required to complete the system function and task analysis of operator tasks speci-fied in the CR-3 E0Ps. As was described above, these OS0s outlined the expected operator responses in terms of proce-dure involvement for the four additional emergency scenarios to be walked through. These OS0s were submitted to FPC for review and comment in October,1985. They were approved for use by FPC in November, 1985 af ter being reviewed by FPC Operations and Engineering personnel. These OS0s were then used by GP in conjunction with the specified APs, EPs and VPs to complete the detailed description of required instru-mentation and controls entered on the pre-fill portion of the task analysis worksheets.
COMMENT FPC should address the following concerns about the mockup:
(1) Since all instrumentation was not mocked up, require-ments relevant to the missing instrumentation were never compared totally with available hardware.
(2) Did the mockup reflect the as-built condition for the time period during which the SF8TA were performed?
RESPONSE
To address (1) above:
Requirements for the instrumentation located on back panels (and not mocked up) were evaluated in the actual control room.
To address (2) above:
The mockup reflected the as-built conditions for the time period during which the original SF&TA were performed. The l
l
photographs were taken in January 1984. The mockup was used at the Columbia, Maryland, GP office during March-April 1984 for appropriate portions of the control room survey. The mockup was crated and shipped to CR-3 in May 1984 The por-tion of the original SF&TA that involved the mockup (the emergency scenario walkthroughs) occurred in August 1984 FPC is currently utilizing a CAD system to reflect recent changes and provide greater flexibility for incorporation of changes and for training purposes. The CR-3 mockup was modified for use during the additional emergency scenario ,
walkthroughs conducted during December 1985 by overlaying panel sections which were extensively modified during the 1985 refueling outage with CAD drawings of the revised panel layout.
Modifications to panel sections completed since the mockup were subjected to review on an individual basis at the GP Columbia, Maryland, offices. This review consisted of a table top analysis of the revised CAD drawings showing the layout of the affected panel sections.
- 6. Validation of Control Room Functions COMMENT The licensee should complete validation of remaining emer-gency scenarios.
RESPONSE
The validation of the additional emergency scenarios was completed in December, 1985 by conducting walkt troughs of these scenarios in accordance with the OS0s. The mockup was updated for use in these walkthroughs by overlaying panel sections with the latest revision of the CAD drawing of the Control Board layout where required. As before, procedure steps involving panel sections which were not part of the mockup were reviewed in the CR-3 Control Room. These walk-
~
throughs were performed by FPC plant operators and observed by GP human factors and FPC engineering personnel. This validation effort resulted in the identification of five l
additional HE0s.
l i .
- . . _ , , , . ~ . . . _ . . - - - . y-.-. _ _ _ , ,_ - _ . - , ._ _ . . - . . - . _ . , . - _ _ _ , _ . _ . _ . _ , _ , - . . - . _ . _ , _ . _ . . - , , . _ . - , _
- 7. Assessment of HEOs COMMENT The licensee has not provided to the audit team or in the Summary Report an adequate description of its assessment methodology and criteria to facilitate evaluation of the activities conducted rel ative to the requirements of NUREG-0737, Supplement 1. The licensee needs to provide a clear description of the assessment in sufficient detail to pennit evaluation of work accomplished.
RESPONSE
The assessment approach is described on pages 29-31 of the l Summary Report. The approach taken is not significantly different from that FPC's consultant (GP) has used for more than a dozen other DCRDRs.
The evaluation of safety consequences and error potential ultimately involves the expert judgement of the DCRDR team.
FPC has attempted to provide a systematic and structu red method by which the experts are polled.
Data from the operating experience review (GER), and the system functional review and task analysis (SF8TA) were con-sidered explicitly for HEOs derived from those sources and
implicitly for any other HE0s that seemed to be related to situations identified during the OER and SFf. A.
The method of combining safety importance and error poten-tial is explicit in our categorization scheme listed on page 30 of the Sumcary Report. To be conservative, if an HE0 had any significant safety consequence, it rated - at least a Category 3, if not a 1 or 2. Error potential or documenta-tion were then used to decide if an HE0 should be categor-ized 1, 2 or 3.
7 The differences noted between the Program Plan and the Sum-mary Report in the HE0 assessment area reflect the differ-ence in purpose of these two documents. The HE0 categories are described in terms of safety significance and error potential in the Summary Report whereas the Program Plan provides categorization guidance based on system association and/or operational constraints.
Verification of cumulative and interactive effects was con-sidered during assessment. HE0s were reviewed by the DCRDR team on a within panel / system basis to determine the extent to which they cumulatively increased the potential for error on that panel / system. In those instances where there was a higher error potential due to cumulative or interactive effects, the HE0 was upgraded to the next higher category.
,e.,-,-w ----- -- --%--.w.--, - - , y r-%- - r--mgy9-__ -- _ _ - - - - m.,
g -g
-.-a.,e9w. 9..y -----7-_p
The DCRDR team participated in the assessment of HE0s from both the original and the additional SF&TA efforts. For the HEOs resulting from the original SFATA, team members gather-ed in front of the mockup for a two-day session. Then, a second meeting was held to further discuss resolutions and provide additional information on the HE0s.
Because of the small number of HE0s resulting from the additional SF&TA effort completed in December 1985, the i
assessment phase for these additional HE0s was conducted by the DCRDR Project Manager soliciting responses from the DCRDR team members on an individual basis and then cross i
comparing coments instead of convening the DCRDR team for a group review session.
The discrepancy between the highest number assigned to an HE0 and the total number of HE0s submitted with the Sumary Report can be explained as follows:
The HE0 numbers were assigned for nominal administra-tive control purposes only. The highest HE0 number is greater than the number submitted because there were some redundant HE0s, some incorrect HE0s, and because some computer records (i.e., HE0s) were created with typographical errors that were easier to resolve by
)
\
creating new records rather than editing the old. The computer then automatically generated a new number.
- 8. Selection of Design Improvements COMMENT The licensee should provide more detailed description of the systematic approach used to determine and select Human Engineering Deficiency (HED) solutions. The 11censee is encouraged to ensure participation of the entire DCRDR team, including human factors personnel, in the selection process.
RESPONSE
The method for selecting design improvements involved the ,
collective expertise of the DCRDR team. Most of the improvements were straightforward. Each improvement was discussed thoroughly, however, and potential adverse or interactive consequences of changes to the control room were considered.
- The DCRDR team was involved in determining recomoiended
~
solutions as follows:
I l
Each HEU was chtegorized by type (i.e., annunciator problem, recorder, engraving, location, etc.). In areas where there ware a significant number of similar HE0's, the problems were studied on a generic basis. Specifically, areas such as the annunciators, control room recorders, nameplates and engraving were evaluated on a control room wide basis.
HEOs which identified specific problems (i.e., instrument ranges, swapping position of control switches, etc.) were looked at on a one for one basis.
The result of this review effort was completion of the Recommendation section of the HE0 record sheets. These recommendations were used as the basis for development of a conceptual design by Gilbert / Commonwealth Inc. (G/CI) under contract to FPC. G/CI employed its own independent human factors consultant (Essex Corp.) to serve in an advisory capacity during development of the conceptual design.
This conceptional design was then reviewed by the FPC opera-tions and plant staff for their input.
COMMENT r
l Before the licensee can select design improvements for many identified HEOs, it should complete the numerous evaluative studies mentioned on the HE0 forms. At a minimum, the I
licensee needs to provide a schedule for study completions and a time frame during which solutions will be proposed.
RESPONSE
The conceptual design effort, including studies of the over-all Control Room environment, was completed in March 1986 with delivery of the final conceptual design document pre-pared by G/CI to FPC. The majority of the detailed design was completed by G/CI in May,1986, and consisted of modifi-cation packages for the different Control Room panel sections. Detailed solutions for a few HE0s, including the ones resulting from the additional SF&TA effort performed in December 1985, have required additional engineering review to develop an acceptable correction. This effort has been ongoing since the delivery of the majority of the detailed design in May 1986 but it is expected that all detail design work will be completed by December 31, 1986. As with the conceptual design effort, G/Cl has used its human factors consultants during development of the detailed design to review the individual modifications for human factors impact.
FPC will install the modifications specified by the detail desigr. during the next scheduled refueling outage which is now scheduled to begin in September 1987. The DCRDR Project Director is the individual responsible for guiding and over-seeing this project.
As a clarification note, FPC does not consider the discrep-ancy documented on the HE0 Record form to be an HED until an acceptable corrective action or justification statement has been entered under the Action section of the Record form.
This is because in some cases the engineering analysis required to develop a detailed design for correction of an HED has revealed that the feature to be provided by the recommended solution is already provided by other equipment or that the description of discrepancy was not accurate in the first place. In any case, FPC considers that the dis-tinction between HE0 and HED is implicit in the action taken and not worthy of the additional effort that would be required to modify the HE0 Record to specify which HE0s are actual HEDs.
- 9. Verification That Improvements Will Provide the Necesssry Corrections Without Introducing New HEDs COMMENT The licensee needs to document its verification methodology and describe how interactive and aggregate effects of pro-posed changes will be considered.
RESPONSE
Although each individual solution / design modification involved human factors personnel in both the conceptual and detail design phases, the entire control board modification design package will be subjected to an additional Human Factors review and verification program. This review will be performed by Human Factors personnel f rom GP, the organi-zation that organized and performed the DCRDR, and thus will be independent of the human factors review effort utilized by G/CI in the conceptual and detail design development.
This review was initiated with the transmittal of the detail design modification packages to FPC in May 1986, who, in turn, forwarded the applicable portions to GP. This review is being made to ensure that the overall control board modi-fication:
- 1. Corrects the HE0's previously identified
- 2. Does not create new HE0s The methodology of this review is to perform a tabletop analysis of the CAD drawings showing the revised control board layout plus other applicable design documents such as annunciator / events recorder lists and arrangement sketches, nameplate and escutcheon plate sketches and the sketches of the scales and chart paper being purchased for the new l
recorders. This tabletop review and analysis is being per-formed by GP.
In addition, revised CAD drawings of all control board f ront panel sections showing the control panel layout af ter incor-poration of all proposed changes will be reviewed by selected operations personnel. Any adverse operations comments will be resolved by the DCRDR team.
COMMENT Verification needs to be completed for HE0 solutions yet to be determined.
RESPONSE
The design details of HE0 corrections not included in the original design modification packages provided to FPC by l
G/CI in May 1986 are being given to GP as they become avail-able for incorporation in the final review effort described above. It is anticipated that the overall final human f actors review of all Control Board modifications to be made during the next refueling outage will be completed by Decem-ber 31, 1986.
COMMENT The licensee should provide details of the long-term human factors procedure which will be established to evaluate con-trol room design changes subsequent to the DCRDR.
RESPONSE
in addition to the modified control board, the outcome of this control board modification effort will include:
- 1) A human factors design conventions document which will contain the guidelines related to panel layout, con-trols, visual displays, and labels and location aids.
This document will be maintained by the FPC Nuclear Operations Engineering Department.
- 2) An engineering program to ensure that all changes made to the control room and control board are performed in a coordinated manner, and to ensure that human f actors principles are followed. This program will be admin-istered by the FPC Nuclear Operations Engineering Department.
In the future, minor changes to the control board will be performed utilizing the human factors convention document within the structure of the engineering program. Projects )
i l
with major changes will require the use of outside human factors consultants. Such projects will be lead by an appropriate staff member from the FPC Nuclear Operations Engineering Department.
- 10. Coordination of the DCRDR with Other improvement Programs No concerns were noted in this area.
- 11. Proposed Corrective Actions and Justification for HEDs Left Uncorrected COMMENT The licensee needs to respond to problems specified in Appendices A-D of this report.
RESPONSE
Attached to this Supplement to the FPC DCRDR Summary Report are the HE0s listed in Appendices A thru D of the NRC Evalu-l ation Report revised to address the stated concerns. Where l
an HE0 was listed under two categories, i.e., both in Appen-dix A and D, the conservative approach was taken and the HE0 revised to satisfy the more stringent concern.
COMMENT The licensee needs to specify HEDs relating to missing instruments. Solutions for these HEDs need to be provided for review.
RESPONSE
HEUs resulting from the DCRDR have been submitted for NRC review. The fact that no HE0s consisting of missing instru-mentation were identified is not surprising to FPC consider-ing the extensive safety modifications implemented in the seven years since the TMI event. As expected, however, there were numerous HE0s documenting instrumentation with inappropriate ranges, inadequate scale layout and less than optimum location.
Low (NRC/Supp)DNSI-2 1
, - . , - , , , - ,- ~,,~------e -
, , , - - ,,,n-,--,--~,---e ,---n -
v- - -- - , - - - - - -
.t i .
I 1
APPENDIX 1 Task Analysis Worksheet Fields (Columns) Definitions, Equipment Suita-bility Decision Process Flow Chart and HE0 Categorization Guidelines I
i k
i i
i, J
i i
i i
i i
i 4
b i
i i
l J
i l
l 1
i i
j Low (Appendix 1)D1-3 27 eweg_ . _ _ . _ -
.m-wt=*=e
--r e r w w w w e-w-ve, erw wn~+---em+=m- *waen.r- m
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION Task Analysis Worksheet Fields (Columns) Definitions
- 1. Procedure - identifier (ID)
- 3. Task Description - a description of the operator's tasks in the operating sequence at the element level. Setpoints were included here if noted in procedure.
2
- 4. System - abbreviation of the system or systems called out in the task description
- 5. Decisions or Contingencies - operator decisions or contingent actions that are linked to task performance
- 6. Info / Action Req. - the information and control / action requirements for successful task performance (derived independently of j the actual IEC in the control room). Noted in this column are (1) the component or procedural information necessary,for operators to adequately assess plant conditions or system status and (2) the relevant characteristics (Range, Units, Control Status) of the parameter or component referenced for the operator to execute the task. These requirements were determined using operations, engineering, and i human factors personnel.
NOTE: Development of Info / Action Req. for Task Analysis Worksheets involved three (3) criteria:
- 1. Steps 1 through 6 were completed on the Task Analysis Worksheet using independent sources of data other than the actual I&C present in the control room.
I
- 2. Developed by Subject Matter Expert (SME) using accepted sources of documentation. The SME made a determination of means based on Task Description (e.g., if something called for trending then a recorder was selected, or if a setpoint was needed then a meter was selected).
! 3. Structured to include 4 pieces of data l
- a. Means - recorder, meter, switch, etc...
- b. Range 2500, 50-150, etc. . . ;
- c. Units - psig, gym, degree F, etc. . .
< d. States - on, off, close, normal, open, etc...
4 1
The remaining columns of the Task Analysis Form were utilized during the verification and Validation (v&V) phases which are described below:
) 26
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION
- 7. IEC Information - the existing Instrumentation and Control (IEC) that the operator urad for each procedural step were documented based on the control room. All IEC need to either (1) initiate, maintain, or remove a system from service, (2) confirm that an appropriate system l
response has or has not occurred, i.e., feedback, or (3) make a decision regarding plant or system status were listed along with the panel I.D.
- 8. Comments and EEOs - comments related to operating sequence overview execution, task performance, or the accompanying task requirement columns were noted in this column as were candidate HEOs based on a negative response to the " availability and suitability" questions---
Phase (1) Is the necessary IEC required for successful operator task performance available?
Phase (2) Is the existing IEC suitable to meet the postulated information and control requirement for the operator tasks?
The second phase determined the human engineering suitability of the required Instrumentation and Controls by comparing them against the criteria shown in Figure . For example, if a meter utilized in a particular procedure step exists in the control room, that particular meter was examined to determine whether or not it had the appropriate range, accuracy, and units to support the operator in the corresponding procedural step. If the range, accuracy, and units were appropriate, it was not noted on the Task Analysis Form. Conversely, if the meter range, accuracy, or units was not appropriate
' for the parameter of interest to the operator, a note was written in the " COMMENTS" column of the Task Analysis Form. This type of occurrence was defined as an HEO and documented accordingly on an HEO form. The suitability review of IEC was performed by an operations expert and a human factors engineer.
NOTE : It should be noted that a comment does not imply a problem but an HEO does. Additionally, if there is nothing in this column, then
- it has been determined that the IEC identification meets the
" availability and suitability" requirements.
I The Task Analysis Worksheet thus served as the complete record of operator tasks, decisions, information and control requirements, and IEC availability and suitability during the selected operating sequence i
i overviews. This record was developed through the series of steps described
- above.
I J
Z9
Flow Chart of Decision Process for Verifying Equipment Suitability For eve *v test sa tae task eastvsis eer.
.fv est vae eaw.omeat noec.f.e6.
auetatie to meet tae semanes of emee-pact coat apac.es.
F CalTERI A Fon DECISIONS Does NFE/0PS me
- e satormat on d sofeved to sop'coste oow.oment NO
,,,,,o, ,oo,oo,, ate modsote (eim,s. es. swditorvi eato, mat,on'teedoact 7
for me e Aporoo,iete parameter d.solaved q,sas '
e D.soie, o' owaat tat.,e sad o* aus sita-t=e enfoemet.oa aooropeiste for task la say staer e D.screte' coat.aown coatrot fwactions oow omeat app'oofiste o*8'leble wai@ NO o'o*43es YES ano,oo,,.t, e C+so'ae of tread saformateoa evailable when sopropriete enf o'* s t'on /
feccoact' N
p YES
=
Does tae eow,:, meat e ov ce act.s'* NO sys'e* statwo sio'* st oa' '
I& C *'8*'ects e Actus'systea eow.omeat statws safor-mat oa es o'oo ded #8tae' t*aa sadett issay enformetsoa le g demaad es ve**e otae+ equiomeat oos 1.o* for teat *ohers direct es *a- swa. lease laat diteCf meanwfe of flous sa syste* loool peo ioes approoe. ate enfo' met'on sad YES reheets aca.or evivem etervs' NO YES g
H F E tcPS rt&C
- Eev.omeat pro.. des sooeooe.au pre-tes.ca saa reage of teatros is
,e NO e $ case va.ts are coas,stemt wta the ee- sowiomeat yet of prec's on needed usesose' e $cs'e reap sosas tae espreted reage MED of oce'at.ones parameters ideatif.e4 e Valves d soieved are in a foaa immaf. ygg stei, onesoie we o conv ers.oa 1f Eossomeat meets esitsodety reewefe** eats fo, inna pereo,maaee Figure Flowchart of Decision Process for verifying Equipment suitability SC
FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION Categorizing UEOs into Levels of Significance Categories in which HEOs were grouped are defined below. This categorization was an aid to the reviewer in further assessing the importance of HEOs as well as providing a means of assigning priorities to HEOs for corrective action. The method allows for distinguishing between those discrepancies that are known to have contributed to operator error and those that have been evaluated to have potential for contributing to operator error.
The categories are:
(1) Category I - HEOs associated with documented errors which resulted in unsafe conditions or Technical Specification violations.
(2) Category II - HEOs associated with high potential errors which may result in unsafe conditions or Technical Specification violations.
(3) Category III - HEOs associated with low potential errors which may result in unsafe conditions or Technical Specification violations.
Category IV - HEOs not important to safety.
(4) 31
Y
>i APPENDIX A HE0s which the SAIC Evaluation Report stated had inadequate proposed corrective actions as submitted with the FPC Summary Report.
The proposed corrective actions were judged to be inadequate because they:
A. Were too brief, general, or ambiguous to allow an adequate evaluation to be made. This listing included HEOs 121, 122, 147, 254 and 278.
and/or B. Only partially corrected the discrepancy. This listing included HE0s 0044, 0109, 0121, 0146, 0153 and 0203.
l l
l i
l l
Low (AppendixA)DI-3 82
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0044 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.1.1E CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS GENERAL PRINCIPLES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT D2SCRIPTION:
IC DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
POSITION INDICATIONS ON EIGHTEEN SWITCHES ARE WORN OFF. .
.---=- ====--------------------------------------------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ARROW IS REDUNDANT TO THE SWITCH SHAPE WHICH THE OPERATOR IS TRAINED TO RECOGNIZE, THEREFORE, THERE IS NO ERROR POTENTIAL AND NO SAFETY CONSEQUENCES.
ACTION:
ACTION TO DE TAKEN THE ARROWS WILL DE REPAINTED ON THE SWITCHES AS A MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY. THIS ALONG WITH THE PHYSICAL SHAPE OF THE SWITCH WILL MEET THE GUIDELINES OF 6.4.
- 4. 5. D. SINCE SWITCHES HAVE DEEN IN USE SINCE 1977, THIS DOES NOT REFLECT A LACK OF DURADILITY OF THE SWITCH.
t CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 11
HUMAN ENQlNEERINQ GBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0109 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION o REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.4.4.5D CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS ROTARY SELECTOR CONTROLS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ED .
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE CHROME ROTARY SWITCHES USE BLACK POSITION ARROWS WHICH ARE FADED AND DIFFICULT TO SEE.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
REFILL THE POSITION ARROWS WITH BLACK PAINT TO ENHANCE VISIBILITY. THIS ALONG WITH THE PHYSICAL SHAPE OF THE SWITCH WILL DE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 6.4.4.
SD. THE REPAINTING OF THE ARROWS WILL DE DONE AS A MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 34
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0121 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.* 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.1.1E GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUDAREA:
CONTROLS GENERAL PRINCIPLES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG HOV-249 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE POSITION POINTERS FOR VALVE OPERATORS ARE WORN. ONE VALVE OPERATOR IS DROKEN.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE ARROWS WILL DE REPAINTED ON THE SWITCHES TO ENHANCE VISIBILITY AND DROKEN SWITCH (HOV-249) WILL DE REPAIRED AS MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES. THIS ALONG WITH PHYSICAL SHAPE OF THE SWITCH WILL THEN DE IN COMPLIANCE WITH 6.4.
- 4. 5. D. SWITCHES HAVE DEEN IN USE SINCE 1977. THIS RANDOM FAILURE IS NOT INDICATING OF LOW DURADILITY OF THESE SWITCHES.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0122 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS l
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.2.1 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG CDV-35, CWV-1, CDV-119 120, HDV-247 248 249, HDV-250, TBM-1, GEN VOLT ADJUST, DASE ADJUST, NAIN TURDINE LUBE DIL CLR TEMP SELECTOR SWITCH DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CONTROL MOVEMENTS DO NOT CONFORM TO ANY SET PATTERN. THE CONTROL MOVEMENTS ARE INCONSISTENT IN SOME CASES DECAUSE AUTOMATIC IS A RELATIVE POSITION ON THE SWITCH. SWITCHES 1, 2, AND 9 LISTED ABOVE ARE RELATIVE. SWITCHES 3 AND 4 ARE HAND-OFF-AUTO AND SHOULD DE OPEN-CLOSED-AUTO. SWITCHES 5-8 ARE AUTO-NORMAL-DUMP AND SHOULD DE AUTO-NORMAL-OPEN. SWITCHES 10 AND 11 ARE RAISE-LOWER AND SHOULD DE LOWER-RAISE. SWITCH 12 IS HIGH-LOW AND SHOULD BE LOW-HIGH.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE CONTROL SWITCH POSITION ARRANGEMENT CONVENTION AT CR-3 IS THAT MANUAL POSITIONS TAKE PRIORITY OVER AUTO (SEE HEO 0045 FOR MORE DETAILS)
ACTION:
CWV-1 AND CDV-35 ARE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CR-3 DESIGN CONVENTION AND THEREFORE REMAIN UNCHANGED. TDM-1 IS ARRANGED MAN-OFF-AUTO. THIS WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED DECAUSE FOR TECHNICAL REASONS. THE SWITCH MUST GO THROUGH THE OFF POSITION DEFORE MANUAL OR AUTO. CDV-119/120 WILL DE CHANGED FROM HAND-OFF-AUTO TO CLOSED-AUTO-OPEN. HDV-247, -248, -249 AND -250 WILL DE CHANGED FROM AUTO-NORMAL-DUMP TO AUTO-NORMAL-OPEN. GEN VOLT ADJUST AND BASE ADJUST WILL DE CHANGED FROM RAISE-LOWER TO LOWER-RAISE. MAIN TURDINE LUBE OIL CLR TEMP WILL DE CHANGED FROM HIGH-LOW TO LOW-HIGH.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-05) 34
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0146 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.1.1E CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS GENERAL PRINCIPLES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE POSITION INDICATORS ARE WORN OFF FOR THREE VALVE CONTROL SWITCHES.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE ARROWS WILL BE REPAINTED ON THE SWITCHES AS A MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY TO ENHANCE VISIBILITY. THIS ALONG WITH THE PHYSICAL SHAPE OF THE SWITCH WILL MET THE GUIDELINES OF 6.4.4.5D. SINCE SWITCHES HAVE BEEN IN USE SINCE 1977, THIS IS NOT INDICATIVE OF LOW DURADILITY.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 37
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0147 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.2.1 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUDAREA:
CONTROLS DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PD MUV-112 4
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
4 THE NORM POSITION ON THIS CONTROL SWITCH WOULD DE DETTER LADELED "TO MUT."
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ERROR PRODADILITY IS LOW DECAUSE OF OPERATOR TRAINING. NO SAFETY CONSEQUENCES DECAUSE PROCEDURES ARE USED TO OPERATE VALVES.
a 4
l l ACTION:
A LADEL WILL DE ADDED NEXT TO THE NORMAL POSITON OF THE SWITCH WHICH READS
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 28
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0153 i PLANT: CR3 '
i DATE: 04/23/84
, TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION 1 ----------_------------------------------------_-----------------_-------------
4 REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 QUIDELINE NO. : 6.5.1.1B I GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED 1
l PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PD LP INS XOVER FLOW DH-38-FII, WT-32-LI, RB H2 PURGE FLOW, MISC WTR STOR TK LEVEL DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SEVERAL METERS ARE LADELLED WRONG. ONE METER DOES NOT INDICATE WHICH WAY
, FLOW IS GOING. ADDREVIATIONS ARE NOT USED CONSISTENTLY. WRONG ABBREVIATIONS j ARE USED ON SEVERAL METERS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
! ERROR POTENTIAL IS HIGH, HOWEVER, SAFETY CONSEQUENCES ARE LOW BECAUSE l OPERATOR FUNCTIONS RELATED TO SAFETY SYSTEMS ARE NOT SOLEY DEPENDENT ON THESE INSTRUMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, IMMEDIATE ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH THIS INFORMATION IS NOT REQUIRED.
! ACTION:
i l LP XOVER METER WILL DE LADELED "A" TO D' AND 'S TO A" AT THE ENDS OF SCALE.
+ H2 PURGE WILL DE LADELED WITH "CFM" THE HANDWRITTEN LADEL FOR WTR LEVEL WILL I BE REPLACED WITH A PERMANENT LABEL. RANGE OF WT-32-LI IS O-1000 PERCENT
! WILL DE ADDED TO LADEL (SEE HEO-0150) (REF: MAR 84-08-10-03 & MAR C4-01-10-10)
\ ---------------------_----------------------_-----_----_------------_----------
, CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
! 2 REFUEL VI i
i l
i i
i b
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0203 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION .
REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW ,
DOCUMENT NO.: 0 13 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. S.1. 2 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUPAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT EFFECTIVE PANEL LAYOUT PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ED DSP, DCP, DHP, MVP, RWP SWITCHES DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THAT THESE CONTROLS WERE LIKELY TO DE OPERATED IN ERROR DECAU5E OF THEIR LOCATION AND THE FACT THAT THEY ALL HAVE BLACK-HANDLED SWITCHES.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THESE CONTROL SWITCHES HAVE DEEN SUDJECTED TO A HUMAN FACTORS REVIEW AND HAVE DEEN FOUND TO DE LOCATED DY SYSTEM / FUNCTION WITHIN THE CONSTRA!NTS OF THE ELECTRICAL SEPARATION CRITERIA IMPOSED BY THEIR SAFEGAURDS CHANNEL ASSOCIATION. PER HUMAN FACTORS RECOMMENDATIONS, DEMARCATION LINES ARE DEING ADDED TO IDENTIFY THE AREA IN WHICH THE MVP CONTROL SWITCHES ARE LOCATED TO ENHANCE OPERATOR USE AND MINIM 1ZE ERRORS. (REF: 6.8.1.3) (REF: HED 116)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 2 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-10) 40
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0254 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.1
, CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUDAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS
, PANEL /WDRKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN GRAPHIC RECORDERS DESCRIP TION OF DISCREPANCY:
I RECORDERS DO NOT KEEP ACCURATE TIME AND MUST DE RESET SEVERAL TIMES DURING THE DAY. ARMS OF RECORDERS TEND TO STICK AND NOT TREND WHEN RECORDERS ARE PUSHED I N. PAPER ADVANCE THUMDWHEELS DO NOT WORK PROPERLY. PENS SOMETIMES DO NOT IN% PROPERLY.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ERROR POTENTIAL IS HIGH DECAUSE THE OPERATOR IS READING POTENTIALLY INACCURATE INFORMATION. RECORDERS ARE USED FOR TRENDING PURPOSES ONLY THEREFORE SAFETY CONSEQUENCES ARE LOW.
ACTION:
ALL XISTING RECORDERS ON THE FRONT PANEL SECTIONS OF THE MAIN CONTROL DOARD WIL REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS. ALL EXISTING RECORDERS ON THE REAR PANEL SEC ON OF THE MAIN CONTROL DOARD WITH THE EXCEPTIONS OF RC-154-PR/TR AND DS-65-PR ARE DEING REPLACED. RECORDERS RC-154-PR/TR AND BS-65-PR ARE NON-SAFETY RELATED, AND ARE USED FOR HISTORICAL RECORD PURPOSES ONLY AND NOT FOR NORMAL OR EMERGENCY PLANT OPERATIONS.
CATEGORY; IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 (REF: MAR 84-08-10) 4/
i
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0278 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 i TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION a REVIEWER: LIDDLE d
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY J
i
- DOCUMENT NO.
- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. I . 2. 3F l GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
- CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE SIT-DOWN CONSOLE DIMENSIONS 4
l PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC A OTSG LEVEL. FEEDWATER CONTROLS i
l DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
i A OTSO LEVEL IS DIFFICULT TO SEE WHILE OPERATING FEEDWATER CONTROLS.
i i
RECOMMENDATION: .
}' CHANGE i THE ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW BECAUSE THE OPERATOR CAN READ THE LEVEL. SAFETY CONSEQUENCES OF MISREADING OTSG LEVEL ARE HIGH.
J l
ACTION:
THE RECORDERS FOR THE OTSG OPERATE LEVELS WILL BE REPLACED WILL A NEW 2 PEN l INDICATING RECORDER. THIS NEW RECORDER WITH DIRECT READING SCALES AND
- INDICATORS ON THE FRONT WILL BE MUCH NORE READABLE THAN THE EXISTING BAILEY f
WR RECORDERS AND, WILL DE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE FEEDWATER CONTROLS. THIS l COMDINATION OF DETTER READABILITY AND RELOCATION WILL GREATLY ENHANCE THE l ABILITY OF THE OPERATOR TO MONITOR DOTH OTSG LEVELS WHILE OPERATING THE i FEEDWATER CONTROLS. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-04) l IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
J CATEGORY:
3 REFUEL VJ l
r 42
APPENDIX B HEOs which the SAIC Evaluation Report stated had inadequate justifica-tions for not taking corrective actions .as submitted with the FPC Sum-mary Report.
The justifications were judged to be inadequate because they:
A. Were too brief, general, ambiguous, or did not sufficiently address the discrepancy to allow an adequate evaluation to be made. This listing included HE0s 0020, 0030, 0033, 0040,
, 0045, 0056, 0062, 0063, 0069, 0107, 0116, 0125, 0154, 0161, 0196, 0212, 0230, 0247, 0259, 0260, 0261, 0270, 0276, 0282, 0286, 0287, 0291, 0342, 0346, 0347, 0348, 0355, 0364, 0365, 0375, 0376, 0377.
and/or B. Did not provide an adequate basis for the justification. This listing included HE0s 0004, 0005, 0009, 0010, 0012 0064, 0071, 0072, 0081, 0086, 0092, 0099, 0106, 0112, 0115, 0134, 0138, 0140, 0157, 0160, 0172, 0187, 0207, 0222, 0226, 0266, 0267, 0268, 0277, 0295, 0300, 0301, 0303, 0327, 0332, 0334, 0337, 0338, 0347, 0348, 0359, 0364.
NOTE:
Re-evaluation since the submittal of the FPC DCRDR Stanmary Report has resulted in corrective actions being identified for the following HEOs:
0004, 0005, 0010, 0012, 0040, 0045, 0064, 0072, 0081, 0112, 0115, 0134, 0140, 0161, 0187, 0207, 0212, 0222, 0226, 0230, 0259, 0260, 0267, 0268, 0270, 0286, 0287, 0291, 0295, 0300, 0301, 0303, 0347, 0348, 0355, 0375, 0377.
Low (AppendixB)D1-3 43
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0004 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.6C GUIDELINE AREA: CUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS COLOR CODING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SR DECCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
WHITE AND YELLOW INDICATOR LIGHTS ARE USED ON THIS PANEL WITH NO APPARENT REASON FOR DIFFERENTIATION.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
ALL INDICATOR LIGHT LENS ON THIS PANEL WILL DE CHANGED TO AMDER (YELLOW)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 4.4
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0005 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: CADDY DATA . SOUR CE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 QUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.1.1 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUDAREA:
LADELS AND LOCATION AIDS NEED FOR LABELING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CN DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LADELING NEEDS IMPROVEMENT ON ALL OF THE DACK PANELS. .
RECOMMENDATION:
REVIEW AND CORRECT LADELS.
ACTION:
ALL LADELS WILL DE REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE TO CR3 ABBREVIATION LIST AND FOR PROPER DESCRIPTION AND WILL DE CORRECTED AS REGUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 45
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0009 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.6C GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS COLOR CODING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
MI SG RADIATION MONITORS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
FAIL / RESET IS INDICATED BY A GREEN LIGHT. THIS IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE USE OF GREEN THROUGHOUT THE CONTROL ROON.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE FAIL / RESET STATUS LIGHT WAS SUPPLIED AS PART OF THE ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT AND IS ACTUALLY A DACKLIGHTED PUSHBUTTON SWITCH. THE GREEN LIGHT BEING ON INDICATES THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS OPERATING NORMALLY, CONSISTENT WITH THE USE OF GREEG LIGHTS IN OTHER AREAS OF THE CONTROL ROOM. THE RESET FUNCTION OF t
THE SWITCH IS USED TO RESET ALARMS. THE OPERATORS ARE TRAINED IN THE ACTIONS TO DE TAKEN IF THE GREEN LIGHT GOES OUT INDICATING A MONITOR FAILURE, AND IN THE USE OF THE RESET SWITCH.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 46
1 I
9 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0010 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 iTWACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: TURNEY
'FDATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.2.3A B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS ZONE MARKING 1 -
P P.ANEL/ WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
',I C MAIN FW TURDINE 3A 3B 4
DE CRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
. CREASE PEN MARKS ARE USED FOR ZONE MARKINGS ON THESE METERS. THE MARKS
,f tINTERFERE WITH READING THE METER.
RECOMMENDATION:
. CHANGE
..s_--_--_____._________________________________________-----__________-_-_-_--_-
)CTION:
a W'rrf1 ARKS HAVE DEEN REMOVED.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 COMPLETE i
I 47
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0012 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUAT!DN REVIEWER: TURNEY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.1E GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATIDN TO BE DISPLAYED PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
VR VENT MCC-3A, VENT MCC-38 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
INFORMATION IS PEN 0! LED ON THE PANEL. EXAMPLE VENT MCC-3A, VENT MCC-38.
RECOMMEND ATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
PENCIL MARKS HAVE BEEN REMOVED, LABELS WILL DE ADDED WHERE REQUIRED.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-10) 48
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0020 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/54 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.2.3A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUSAREA:
PANEL LAYOU LAYOUT CONSISTENCY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
HV DH REMOVAL FLOW, PRESSURIZER SPRAY FLOW FROM DH, AH FILTER 4A 48 DIFF PRESS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THESE METERS ARE NOT PLACED LOGICALLY GIVEN THE REMAINDER OF THE PANEL LAYOUT.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THESE INDICATORS ARE FOR OPERATOR CONVENIENCE ONLY AND ARE NOT REGUIRED FOR i HIS NORMAL OPERATIONAL NEEDS i
8 I
i ACTION:
l NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED
, THE HVR IS A SECONDARY PANEL LOCATED IN REAR OF THE MAIN CONTROL BOARD WHERE
! LESS FREQUENTLY USED PARAMETERS ARE LOCATED. THE ABOVE REFERENCED 1 INDICATIONS HAVE NO FUNCTIONAL RELATIONSHIP TO EACH OTHER OR ANY OTHER i
i INDICATORS OR CONTROL DEVICES ON THIS PANEL AND WERE PLACED ACCORDINGLY.
j -------------------------------------------------_ -------_--------------------
1 CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 4 I
f l
I 1 .
t l
l 1
- , - - - _ _ . . - - - _ _ _ . _ _ . _ - . - - . - _ . . - _ ~ . . . . _--:
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0030 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.2.1.4 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
COMMUNICATIONS WALKIE-TALKIE RADIO TRANSCEIVERS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REGUESTED HEADSETS (APPROXIMATELY SIX) FOR USE WITH THE WALKIE-TALKIES, DECAUSE OF HIGH NOISE LEVELS IN CERTAIN AREAS FOR SPECIFIC TACKS.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE A NOISE SURVEY WAS PERFORMED IN THE CONTROL ROOM AND THE RESULTS INDICATE THAT THE NOISE LEVELS IN PRIMARY OPERATOR OCCUPIED AREAS ARE WITHIN THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED IN NUREG 0700. THE AREAS REFERED TO BY THE OPERATORS ARE AREAS INSIDE THE PLANT, NOT IN THE CONTROL ROOM.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
- C ATEGOR Y
- IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 i
i
J
- HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD 4
HEO.NO.: 0033 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
)
REVIEWER: GADDY q
_________~___________._________________________________________________________
l DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY l _________.___________._________________________________________________________
, DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.7.2.38 4
l GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PROCESS COMPUTERS OPERATOR-DISPLAY RELATIONSHIPS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
, ON DECCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CRT DISPLAYS ARE LOCATED ABOVE THE REACTOR CONTROL PANEL AND,ARE DIFFICULT
}i TO READ DECAUSE OF THEIR HEIGHT AND ANGLE (GREATER THAN 45 DEGREES).
I j _______________________________________________________________________________
! RECOMMENDATION:
I '
NO CHANGE THE CRTs WHICH PROVIDE BACKUP INFORMATION AND ARE LOCATED ABOVE THE REACTOR CONTROL PANEL ARE SATISFACTORY FOR THE OPERATORS, WHO USE THEM IN A STANDING POSITION. FOR THE CRTs TO BE RELOCATED WOULD BE WORSE FOR THE OPERATORS. THE 4 DACKUP INFORMATION WHICH CONSISTS OF SEQUENCE OF EVENTS DATA, CAN BE i
ODTAINED FROM A PRINTER (A HARDCOPY) AS REQUIRED.
I ACTION:
i NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED i
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 4
}
I 4
li 1
i
. i bb
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0040 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER. GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.4.2A B CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS CONTROL SET DESIGN PANEL / WORKSTATION ID. : COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CN DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ANNUNCIATOR CONTROL PUSH 3UTTONS ARE NOT CONSISTENTLY LOCATED FROM PANEL TO PANEL AND DO NOT STAND OUT SUFFICIENTLY FOR EASY LOCATION. IN SOME CASES THE PUSHBUTTONS ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO OTHER CONTROLS WHICH INCLUDE OTHER SIMILAR TYPES OF PUSHDUTTONS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANCE ACTION:
DEMARCATION WILL DE USE AROUND THE ANNUNCIATOR PUSH 3UTTONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINE 6.3.4.2.D(3) TO EASILY RECOGN!ZE THE ANNUNCIATOR RESPONSE CONTROLS. (REF: MAR 04-08-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
- 1 I
)
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD I l
HEO.NO.: 0045 PLANT: CR3 1 DATE: 02/14/84 l 1
TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.4.2.1 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC RCP START INTLK BYPASS-LEFT RCV-10 SWITCH-CENTER BK C PRESSURIZER HTR SWITCH-RIGHT, FWP-28 GOV SPEED CONT RAISE -LEFT LOWER -RIGHT DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
USE OF AUTO POSITION IS NOT CONSISTENT. SOMETIMES AUTO IS TO LEFT OF CENTER ,
SOMETIMES IN THE CENTER AND SOMETIMES TO THE RIGHT.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE CONTROL SWITCH PHILOSPHY AT CR-3 IS THAT CONTROL BOARD SWITCHES ARE ARRANGED SUCH THAT THE MANUAL FUNCTION, OPEN, ON, START, RAISE, ECT... ARE TO THE RIGHT AND CLOSE, OFF, LOWER, ECT... ARE TO THE LEFT. THESE POSITIONS TAKE PRIORITY OVER THE AUTO POSITION. IF A SWITCH HAS ONLY TWO POSITIONS ( I.
E. CLOSE AND AUTC) AUTO IS TO THE RIGHT. IF THE TWO POSITIONS ARE OPEN AND AUTO, THEN OPEN (HAVING PRIORITY) IS TO THE RIGHT AND AUTO IS TO THE LEFT.
1 IF A SWITCH HAS 3 POSITIONS AUTO WOULD DE IN THE CENTER UNLESS TECHNICAL REASONS PREVENT IT.
ACTION:
SWITCH "RCP START INTLK BYPASS" HAS TWO POSITIONS, AUTO AND BYPASS. IN THIS CASE DYPASS MEANS START AND THEREFORE THE SWITCH WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED.
! SWITCH RCV-10 HAS ITS POSITIONS LABELED CLOSE-AUTO-BYPASS. THIS MEETS THE CR-3 DESIGN CONVENTIONS AND THEREFORE RCV-10 WILL NOT BE CHANGED. THERE ARE FIVE SWITCHES FOR THE PRESSURIZER HEATER DANKS. THE SWITCHES FOR BANKS A,8 AND C ARE LADELED OFF-AUTO WHICH MEETS THE CR-3 DESIGN CONVENTIONS. THESE SWITCHES WILL REMAIN UNCHANGED. THE SWITCHES FOR DANKS D AND E ARE PRESE'4TLY ARRANGED ON-OFF-AUTO. THESE WILL DE CHANGED TO OFF-AUTO-ON. THE SWITCHES FOR Jr3 l
l
0045 HE0 No;) #A&E 2 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD FWP-2A AND 23 GOV. SPEED CONTROL ARE PRESENTLY ARRANGED RAISE-OFF-LOWER.
THESE WILL DDE CHANGED TO LOWER-OFF-RAISE.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-04)
I l
C4
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0056 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.3.3A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS
_ - - - - - _ - - - - - - _ - - - _ _ - - _ - - _ - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - =_ ---_--_-_-_----_-_-----
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE LEGEND PUSH 3UTTONS ARE NOT READILY DISTINGUISHADLE FROM LEGEND LIGHTS ON THE DIAMOND CONTROL PANEL.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE ONLY ONE INDICATOR LIGHT IS IN THE MIDDLE OF FIVE PUSHBUTTONS. THE INDICATOR LIGHT CANNOT BE PUSHED. OPERATORS ARE TRAINED TO RECOGNIZE IT.
l --_--_.--------------------_ _. __--_-------_----- -- ---------------- ---
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED THESE DIAMOND CONTROL PANEL LEGEND PUSH 3UTTONS ARE VENDOR SUPPLIED AND ARE THE SAME IN ALL B & W PWR PLANTS. ALSO, THE SIMULATOR, WHICH IS USED TO TRAIN THE OPERATORS, IS DESIGNED WITH THE SAME LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS.
- - _ - - - _ - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - = __ ____ _ _ _ _ --__-----_- - - - - - --------_---__
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
.$~[
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0062 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.1E
=____________________________ ______
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC MEAS. VAR /POS
__________________-_____-_____ ==_______-_________________-__________________
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
NINETEEN BAILEY CONTROLLERS HAVE INSTALLED O-100 METERS WITH A SELECTOR
, SWITCH. THE MEANING OF THE LABELS FOR THESE SWITCHES IS UNCLEAR.
I l RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE OPERATION IS NOT DEPENDENT ON THE READING OF THE DIAL BUT UTILIZES READING ON ANOTHER INDICATOR FOR OPERATOR ACTIONS. DEPENDING ON THE MODE OF OPERATIONS OF THE CONTROLS THE SWITCHES MAY HAVE TWO OR MORE DIFFERENT OPERATIONS. ADDITIONAL HUMAN FACTOR PROBLEMS WOULD BE CREATED BECAUSE OF THE COMPLEXITY OF ANY ADDITIONAL LABELING. OPERATORS ARE SPECIFICALLY TRAINED IN THE USE OF THESE CONTROLS. THE B &.W SIMULATORS CONTAIN THE SAME DEVICES.
- =__________ _ ________= _____ =___________
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ = _ _ _ _
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACT(ON IS REQUIRED
-_- =_______ _______ -
______ __ _ =__________- - ________-
l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 f
I 5
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0063 PLANT: CR3
> DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 QUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.28
==_____ ==--------------------------------------- -----------
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
, VISUAL DISPLAYS USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID. : COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MOST OF THE DAILEY CONTROLLERS HAVE O-100 METERS WHICH REGUISE SOME CONVERSION TO USE. BAILEY SETPOINT METERS ALSO REQUIRE CONVERSION.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE DEPENDING ON THE MODE OF OPERATION OF THESE CONTROLS, THE SCALE OF THE METERS MAY HAVE MORE THAN ONE MEANING. ADDITIONAL HUMAN FACTORS PROBLEMS MAY RESULT FROM THE COMPLEXITY OF ADDITIONAL LABELING. OPERATORS ARE TRAINED TO UNDERSTAND THE MEANING DEPENDING ON MODE OF OPERATON, ALSO THESE SAME METERS ARE USED AT THE B&W SIMULATORS WHERE THE OPERATORS ARE TRAINED.
.----- _= _
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
. - = -- ._-------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 i
57
HUMAN EN0INEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0064 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATIDN REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SCURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.2E CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES PANEL / WORK 5TATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC PRESSURIZER LEVER (UNCOMPENSATED)
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE METER HAS A SCALE RANGE MARKED X10 BUT THE LETTERING IS TOO SMALL COMPARED TO THE NUMERICAL GRADUATIONS.
--------- =-
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
-_---- -=__ _ - -
ACTION:
THE PRESSURIZER LEVEL (UNCOMPENSATED) SCALE WILL BE CHANGED TO READ DIRECT MEASUREMENT (0 - 320 INCHES) ( REF: MAR-84-08-10-04)
- - - - - - - - _ _ _ - - = - - - - _ - - - - - _ - -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 1
S~8
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0069 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.5C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS SCALE MARKING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC TURBINE DRIVEN FWP SPEED DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE INDICATION HAS INCREMENTS OF 0,1250,2500. AND 3750. THE INTERMEDIATE SETTINGS ARE DIFFICULT TO DETERMINE.
4 RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE OPERATOR LOOKS AT THIS METER DURING STARTUP AND SHUTDOWN FOR TREND INFORMATION RATHER THAN SPECIFIC VALUES. THE POTENTIAL FOR ERROR IN PERFORMING THIS PARTICULAR FUNCTION IS LOW. SAFETY CONSEGUENCES OF ERROR ARE LOW BECAUSE THE SYSTEM IS OPERATED BASED ON OUTPUT PRESSURE AND FLOW. IN I ADDITION, THE SIMULATOR FOR OPERATOR TRAINING IS DESIGNED WITH THE SAME METERS FOR EFFECTIVE OPERATOR ACTION. --------------------------------
_ ---=_-
- - - - - - - - - - - - _ - _ - = _ - - - - - - - - - _ - -
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
.--------._-_ =_- ----- _=__ _------ ___ =-----------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 l
1 N
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0071 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.2.2 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS POINTERS
- - _ ==----------------- ------------------------ . _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION: .
IC ROD POSITION
.--== __ ----------------------- ==-------------- _ _ _ - - - ---
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
POINTERS ARE ODDLY SHAPED AND COVER THE NUMERALS ON THE DIAMOND PANEL.
_ ---------------------------. ==- - _---- ----
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THERE IS MINIMAL OPERATION IMPACT. THIS IS USED AS A REFERENCE AND READ AT CLOSE RANGE.
---__---- ___-----_--=_ _
= - - - _ - _ - - _ - - _----------__---_-_-_-__---
ACTION: .
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED THIS IS THE EQUIPMENT PROVIEED BY THE ORIGINAL VENDOR MANUFACTURER AND IT IS THE SAME THROUGHOUT THE INDUE 3TRY IN D & W PWR PLANTS. THE NUMBERS ON THESE INDICATORS HAVE MINIMAL OPERATIONAL MEANING AS THE PRIMARY PURPOSE OF THESE METERS IS TO SHOW RELATIVE ALIGNMENT OF THE POSITION OF INDIVIDUAL RODS WITHIN A CONTROL GROUP.
____ _ .-----------------=____ -==__ == -------------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
- 4 l
6o
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0072 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.38 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC MUV 3 1 AIR FAIL RESET, FWV-40 AIR FAIL RESET, FWV-37 AIR FAIL RESET, FWV-39 AIR FAIL RESET, FWV-28 AIR FAIL RESET
_---_-____-_---__------_--_--__--- __-_--____--_____--_--_-__ _ _ __ __- - A _
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE LEGENDS CONTAIN MORE THAN 3 LINES OF TEXT AND THE WORDING DOES NOT TELL THE STATUS INDICATED DY THE GLOWING LIGHT.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
l THESE LEGEND LICHT INDICATORS ARE BACKLIGHTED PUSHBUTTON SWITCHES. THESE BACKLIGHTED PUSHBUTTONS WILL BE CHANGED TO READ IN THREE LINES: VALVE NO.,
AIR, FAIL. IN ADDITION A NAMEPLATE WILL BE ADDED TO INDICATE THE ACTION OF THE PUSHBUTTON SWITCH (I.E. PUSH TO RESET, ETC). _-------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-04) i 61
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0081 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS
____-----_---------_---__---_-__------_-----_-__=__ =__
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.2.3B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT LAYOUT CONSISTENCY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC ,
RCS MIMIC
===-__----____
--_------_-_-----------_--_--_---_-_-_----____ ==_-_-- __-__-
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MIRROR IMAGING IS USED ON THE RCS MIMIC AND ASSOCIATED INDICATORS BUT IT IS NOT USED ON THE REST OF THE PANEL.
= ---- -___---_-------_------ - ----_----_-_-
_-_---------__=_
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
--==-- =.------_--_---_--_-----------=_
ACTION:
TWO METERS ON THE RCS MIMIC WILL BE REVERSED TO ELIMINATE THE MIRROR IMAGE CONDITION. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-04)
_- =___=-- -- - -- --
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI i
I b
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0086 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.9.2.3A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL-DISPLAY INTEGRATION CONTROLS AND DISPLAYS IN SEPARATE PLANES
===____----------------------------------------------------------------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC CONDENSATE CONTROLS
-------- - - = = - - - - - - - = -----------= = -------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE CONDENSATE FLOW IS TO THE LEFT OF THE CONDENSATE MOTOR CONTROLS.
---------------------------------- =-- ------- ------------------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE CONDENSATE FLOW INDICATOR IS PLACED ON THE SAME PANEL AND LOCATED APPROPRIATELY IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE CONDENSATE FLOW CONTROLLERS. THE CONDENSATE MOTOR CONTROLS ARE NOT USED TO CONTROL FLOW.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = - - - _ = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD 1
i I
HEO. NO. : 0092 1 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
_-_-___--__----__-__--_--_--_-__----__= -_--________-_--__--____--______--_
REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.3A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SF DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ALL RED / GREEN LIGHTS ARE HARD TO SEE.
-------- _ = = _ . -------------------__----------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE LIGHTS ARE NOT HARD TO SEE EVEN FROM A DISTANCE. THE MESSAGE WHICH IS ON SOME OF THE LIGHTS CAN DE EASILY READ IF THE OPERATOR IS STANDING A COMFORTA3LE DISTANCE IN FRONT OF THE PANEL. THE LIGHT INTENSITIES WERE REMEASURED WITH A PRECISION LIGHT METER AND MET THE CRITERIA IN GUIDELINE 6.
5.3.3.A
.--== == -------------------_-------------
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED l
-_-__-___________--_-=
l l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 Co4
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD
?
HEO.NO.: 0099 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CGNTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.2.38 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT LAYOUT CONSISTENCY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SF 4.I6 ES BUS ES/UV BLOCK LO ACTUATED, RESET LIGHTS AND PUSHBUTTONS
=__===---------- _==- =---------------. =-----------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MIRROR IMAGING WAS USED TO LAY OUT REPEATED FUNCTIONS.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE RESET LIGHTS AND PUSHBUTTONS ARE FUNCTIONALLY RELATED TO THE 4160 BUS BREAKERS LOCATED DIRECTLY ABOVE THEM, IN ACCORDANCE WITH GUIDELINE 6.9.2.2.A.
THESE ITEMS ARE NOT RELATED.TO THE REFERENCED ES/UV BLOCK LOCK OUT ACTUATION. THESE ARE SEPARATE FUNCTIONS AND THEREFORE NO MIRROR IMAGING EXISTS.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED i
I
_--___.--_----_------_-----_= -_______________= _==__----_-_-__--___--_--___---
l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l 4 I
l l
l t
I h3I
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HED. NO. : 0106 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS
==__------------------------------------------ ----
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.2.2 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
' CONTROLS CODING OF CONTROLS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID. : COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES HPI MAN ACT, LPI MAN ACT, RB ISO MAN ACT DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CERTAIN MANUAL ACTUATION BUTTONS ARE ENCLOSED BY A YELLOW RING WHEN RED APPEARS TO BE MORE APPROPRIATE.
=----------------------- _-----------------------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE
- THE YELLOW COLLAR PROVIDES A DISTINCT INDICATION. CONSISTENT WITH 0700 GUIDELINE NO. 6.5.1.6 I E. " ATTENTION REGUIRED" ACTION
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED
, CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 4 I
l I
f l
D&
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0107 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
= -
REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.2.2 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS CODING OF CONTROLS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
, ES
- _ _ _ ------------- =---------- -
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE ANNUNCIATOR TEST PUSHDUTTON IS RED. THIS IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE NORMAL USE OF RED.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ __------. =_----- ---------- -
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CR-3 DESIGN CONVENTIONS DOCUMENT. THE COLOR RED IS USED FOR: RUNNING. OPEN, DKR CLOSED, OR TEST. THIS TEST PUSHBUTTON CONFORMS TO THIS CONVENTION ALSO THE ANNUNCIATOR TEST PUSHBUTTONS ARE CONSISTENT THROUGHOUT THE CONTROL ROOM.
=____----------------------. _-------- ------------
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
------------------------------------------------------ =-----------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 67
, HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0112 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
_------------------------ =--------------------------------------------------
REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.2.3A
= =---- =-------------------=_ _ ----------
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS ZONE MARKING
------ = ----------------- ---- _--
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES CRD FILTER DIP INDICATOR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE PURPOSE OF THE GREEN POINTER ON THE CRD INDICATOR IS UNCLEAR.
-- _ ----------------------== == ----------- --------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE GREEN TRIANGLE INDICATED DELTA PRESSURE LIMIT FOR FILTER CHANCE.
= =_ --------------------------- --
ACTION: .
GREEN POINTER HAS DEEN REMOVED.
=_ - _ - = _ - --- _=- ==------- ==-----
l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 COMPLETE G8
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0115 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.3B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES DHV-39 DH REMOVAL OUTLET ISOL, DHV-8 DH DISCH CROSS TIE, CAV-429 POST ACCIDENT SAMPLE VALVE, CAV-430 POST ACCIDENT SAMPLE VALVE, CAV-433 POST ACCIDENT SAMPLE VALUE, CAV-434 POST ACCIDENT SAMPLE VALVE, LRV-70 RB PURGE ISOL VALVE, LRV-72 RB PURGE ISOL VALVE, MUV-64, RWP-2B EMER WTR PP3B, LRV-71 RB PURGE ISOL VALVE, LRV-73 RBB PURGE ISOL VALVE, DHV-40 DH REMOVAL OUTLET ISOL, CAVV-431 POST ACCIDENT SAMPLE VALVE, CAV-432 POST ACCIDENT SAMPLE VALVE, CAV-436 POST ACCIDENT SAMPLE VALVE, SWP-1B EMER CCC PP-3B
==- =------
=_ _
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
NUMEROUS LEGEND LIGHTS ARE NOT CONCISE AND SEVERAL HAVE NORE THAN THREE j LINES OF TEXT.
7 RECOMMENDATICN:
4 CHANGE
- __----------_-_-_----_____-_--_--__---_-_------ ______ = - -
. ACTION:
l l ALL LEGENDS WILL BE REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE TO CR-3S ABBREVIATION LIST AND
! CORRECTED AS REGUIRED. ALTHOUGH THE I.EGEND LIGHTS MAY STILL HAVE MORE THAN 3 LINES OF TEXT, IT IS REGUIRED TO CCNVEY THE PROPER MEANING TO THE OPERATOR (REF GUIDELINE NO 6.6.1.1) (REF: :1AR 84-08-10-02) =- _= ---------------------------
r--------..-------- _
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 0
6
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0116 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
. REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.1.1A B
_ ==----------------------------------------------- --
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
- PANEL LAYOUT ASSIGNING PANEL CONTENTS
=----- ---------------------
___ =-
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES ASV-195-SV, ASV-196-SV, DH TO RCV-53, DHV-91, VIDRASWITCH RESET SWITCHES, 123 FAN ASSY TRNS SWITCHES, MUV-62 3. RWP-2B EMER WTR PP38, SWV-12, SWV-109, SWV-110, SWV-353, SWV-354, AHV-1C 1B, WSV-3 5, WDV-3 94 60 406, SG DRAINS MSV-130. MSV-148, MUV-18 27
_- _ ==-------==__.
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SEVERAL CONTROLS ARE LOCATED ON PANEL WITH CONTROLS THAT ARE NOT CLOSELY t ASSOCIATED.
j RECOMMENDATION:
- NO CHANGE THE ENGINEERING SAFEGUARDS PANEL (ES) IS USED FOR CONTROLS WHICH HAVE A SAFETY FUNCTIONS. THE LEFT SIDE IS REVERSED FOR SAFETY TRAIN A EQUIPMENT.
THE RIGHT SIDE IS FOR TRAIN B EGUIPMENT. THE CENTER SECTION IS FOR COMMON EQUIPMENT (AB). THE ABOVE LISTED EQUIPMENT IS LOCATED APPROPRIATE TO THE SAFETY TRAIN IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH. IN CERTAIN INSTANCES EQUIPMENT MAY HAVE l BEEN BETTER GROUPED BY SYSTEM OR FUNCTION BUT DUE TO SEPARATION REGUIREMENTS l THIS COULD NOT BE ACCOMPLISHED
--------.-=_ -=---- . -------------------- -------
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 l
r l 70 i,
.-+ - - , - - _ _ , - - - - - - _ _ _ , , . - -_- ., , % , , y.__---.%., , . - - - , ,. ,c, - - , - , . - - , .
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0125 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS <
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.3.3C D GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS i
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ALL PUSH 3UTTONS ON THE TURDINE CONTROL PANEL PORTION OF THE TGF SHOULD HAVE BARRIERS.
=__ __-------------------------------------------------------------------- -----
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE BEZEL PROVIDES A GUARD BETWEEN SWITCHES OF APPROX 1/8 INCH. TWO CONTROLS CANNOT DE ACTUATED BY A SINGLE FINGER BECAUSE THE DUTTONS MUST BE DEPRESSED BELOW THE BEZEL SURFACE IN ORDER FOR SWITCH ACTIVATION TO TAKE PLACE.
---==--- __==-------== _ =-------------------------------------
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
~7 /
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0134 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
__ =-------------------------- _--------- -----------------------
DOCUMENT NO. - 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.3A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS
=
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO EH FLUID PUMP TBP-7A, OUTPUT BREAKER SWITCHES, GENERATOR VOLTAGE REGULATOR CONTROL, MSV-7 TV-3 STOP DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE FIRST THREE LEGEND LIGHTS ARE UNLABELED. THE ENGRAVING ON THE FOURTH LEGEND LIGHT IS DIFFICULT TO READ.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
FOR THE FIRST THREE ITEMS LISTED ABOVE, THE LEGEND WILL BE ENGRAVED ON THE LIGHTS. ON THE LAST ITEM THE LEGEND WILL BE ENGRAVED ON A CLEAR LENS SO THAT IS CAN DE READ AND COLORED BOOTS ADDED OVER THE LIGHT BULBS.
l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-05) s I
72
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0138 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.1.3A l
l CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
' PANEL LAYOUT ENHANCING RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
-TO GSF-1A 1B, ARP-1A 1B
----------------------- ==---------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE SWITCHES BELOW SEVERAL INDICATORS ARE NOT GROUPED.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE EACH SWITCH OF A PAIR (GSF-1A,1B AND ARD-1A,18) ARE SPATIALLY LOCATED 3/8 INCH APART AND THE PAIRS ARE SPATIALLY LOCATED 1 1/8 INCH APART. SWITCH IS APPROPRIATELY LADELED. THERE ARE NO INDICATORS ON THIS BOARD WICH ARE RELATED TO THESE CONTROLS.
i
- ACTION
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED
_--_--------_------__----_-----_-_---_-__--_--==__--
i CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 7.7
t HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l HEO.NO.: 0140 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION ,
---_------_-_----__--_ ._ _---_----_-_-_-= ____--__-- ----___---_________
REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
=_- - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
DOCUMENT NO. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.2.38
_--__------------------=___ _-----_------ - = - - - - - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - - - - - - -
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT LAYOUT CONSISTENCY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO CDV-119, CDV-120, HDV-247, HDV-248. HDV-250
__----_------------ ----- _---_ _ ___=_ ----_----_-- ---=_ _ _ _ _
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE MIMIC IS MIRROR IMAGED, AND THE FLOWPATH IS UNCLEAR.
-- __ =--- = = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - = - - - - - - - - - -----
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
_= _-- =----_------------ - - - - _ - - - __ -- ----- -
ACTION:
THE MIMIC WILL DE REVISED TO INCLUDE COLORED FLOW PATH LINES TO ACCENTUATE THE DIFFERENCES AND THUS ELIMINATE ANY OPERATOR CONFUSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH GUIDELINE NO. 6.1.3.20. THE TG MIMIC MIRROR IMAGING WILL BE MAINTAINED AS IT IS CONSISTENT WITH PLANT EQUIPMENT LAYOUT AND WITH THE FLOW DIAGRAMS USED IN TRAINING
--__-----------------------_-------------------_------------------ = --------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-10) i l
74 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0154 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84
. TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.5A I
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS SCALE MARKING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS MU-81-DPI DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
STATION AIR AND INSTRUMENT AIR PRESSURE METERS AND PREFILTER DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE METER HAVE 14 GRADUATIONS DETWEEN NUMERALS.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE OPERATOR FUNCTION THAT DEPENDS ON THIS METER IS TO LOOK AT A CERTAIN RANGE RATHER THAN A SPECIFIC VALUE. THE POTENTIAL FOR PERFORMING THIS
- FUNCTION ERROREOUSLY IS LOW.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 i
i 7f
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0157 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION t
REVIEWER: WEEKS 1
l DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO. : 07CO QUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.3A QUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS
- PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.
- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS i
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
1 THE COLORED LENS MAKES THE RB DOOR / HATCH STATUS LEGENDS HARD TO READ.
=---------------------- -
_-------------------- =
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THIS IS A STATUS PANEL WHICH IS APPROPRIATELY LABELED. OPERATOR USES PANEL TO SEE IF ANY LIGHT IS ON OR ALL LIGHTS ARE OFF. INDIVIDUAL MESSAGE ON LIGHT
! IS UNIMPORTANT
- i. ----------------------------------------------------- --- -----------------
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED i
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0160 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.5.5.2.A.4 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS ELECTRONIC COUNTERS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PD DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
WHITE ON BLACK LETTERING IS USED FOR THE FOXBORO COUNTERS.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THIS IS A MANUFACTURER SUPPLIED PANEL WHICH USES WHITE LETTERS ON A BLACK BACKGROUND. SINCE THE BEZEL SURROUNDING THE DRUM IS BLACK, WHITE LETERS PROVIDE THE HIGHEST CONTRAST.
ACTION:
i NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED l
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 l
77
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0161 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.1.1 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT ASSIGNING PANEL CONTENTS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS LP INJ XOVER FLOW METER, DH-17-MS DH-18-MS, RB H2 PURGE FLOW METER, DOV-210 238, MUV-51 50
----- =
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SEVERAL CONTROLS COULD DE MORE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED. LP INJ XOVER FLOW METER ON ESF PANEL,MSIV TEST MATRIX RESET SWITCHES ON THE TGF PANEL DECAY HEAT REMOVAL CONTROLLERS ON THE ESF PANEL,RB H2 PURGE FLOW ON THE ESF, DOV-210 AND DOV-238 CONTROLLERS SHOULD BE WITH RWP.AND LETDOWN FLOW CONTROLLER SHOULD BE IN PARALLEL WITH MUV-50 INSTEAD OF IN SERIES.
_- _ ---= --------== ------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE LP FLOW AND DH CONTROLS ARE NOT SAFETY RELATED AND SHOULD NOT BE ON ES PANEL BECAUSE OF SEPARATION CRITERIA CONSIDERATION., H2 PURGE IS LOCATED SO OPEFATOR CAN READ IT WHILE OPERATING RELATED CONTROLS. DOVS ARE NOT SAFETY RELATED AND ARE LOCATED APPROPIATELY BECAUSE OF THE SEPARATION CRITERIA CONSIDERATIONS. MIMIC PLACEMENT SHOULD SHOW RELATIVE LOCATION OF MUVS.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ = = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- __ -------- ----
ACTION:
MIMIC PLACEMENT ON PS PANEL WILL SHOW MUV-50 AND MUV-51 IN PARALLEL WHICH IS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS DESIGN. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-03 & MAR 84-08-10-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 78
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0172 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 01/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: HISTORICAL DOCUMENT REVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: UOER 81-11 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.1.1 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS GENERAL PRINCIPLES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
MAIN FEEDWATER PUMP STEAM ISOLATION VALVE SWITCH DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
AN OPERATOR INADVERTENTLY ISOLATED THE MAIN STEAM SUPPLY TO THE OPERATING FEEDWATER PUMP, CAUSING dMERGENCY FEEDWATER TO RE-INITIATE. ,
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE A HUMAN FACTORS REVIEW OF THE SITUATION FOUND NO DESIGN CHANGE THAT COULD BE RECOMMENDED. APPARENTLY, THE OPERATOR WAS NOT LOOKING AT THE PANEL WHEN HE REACHED FOR THE SWITCH. THE MAIN FW PUMP STEAM ISOLATION VALVE SWITCH HAS BEEN DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCES WITH THE DESIGN CRITERIA IN NUREG 0700 SECTION
- 6. 0. 1. 1. IN PARTICULAR, IT MEETS SECTION 6.4.1C. HOWEVER IN THIS PARTICULAR REPORTABLE EVENT, THE OPERATOR WAS IN ERROR BECAUSE HE DID NOT OBSERVE THE l PANEL WHEN READING FOR THE SWITCH 1 ACTION:
f NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED i
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
1 1
i l 79
_. . - - . _ _ . -- . . _ . _~ . .-- _ _ _ - _ . -
i l
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD i
HEO. NO. : 0187 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/83 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: Q 02 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.3.38 4
QUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS CONSISTENCY i
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
____________________________________________= _______________ __- _______
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LABELS AND ANNUNCIATORS ASSOCIATED WITH THIS COMPONENT ARE NOT UNIFORM.
4
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ = ________________________________________ _________________
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANCE
____________________= -- - _______ _____________ _______________________
ACTION:
ALL LABELS, NAMEPLATES AND ANNUNCIATOR WINDOW HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH THE CR3 ABBREVIATION LIST AND FOR DESCRIPTION AND WILL BE CORRECTED AS REQUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l 4 REFUEL VI 4
1 l 20
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0196 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION i
REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.. O 08 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.18 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
1 VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN ~
=--------------- --------------------- --- --
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
DISCHARGE PRESSURE IS ONLY PROVIDED FOR A FEW PUMPS.
I
- ------------------------------------------ _= -------------------------------
- RECOMMENDATION
- .
NO CHANGE DISCHARGE PRESSURE INDICATION IS REGUIRED WHERE THE SYSTEM DESIGN REQUIRES OBSERVATION OF DISCHARGE PRESSURE TO MEET TASK REQUIREMENTS IN NORMAL, ABNORMAL, AND EMERGENCY SITUATIONS. WHERE IT IS NOT NEEDED IT HAS NOT BEEN PROVIDED. THE SF & TA DID NOT IDENTIFY ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THIS AREA.
ACTION:
. NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
= - __ ----------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 i
i i
, 81
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0207 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: G 16 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.2.2B i GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYG POINTERS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC DELTA T. DELTA Tc, THe, TH METERS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE3E METERS ARE SUBJECT TO PARALLAX PROBLEMS.
RECOMMEND ATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
CONTROLS WHICH ARE OPERATED UTILIZING THESE METERS WILL BE RELOCATED CENTRAL TO AND BELOW THE METERS WITH WHICH THEY ARE ASSOCIATED TO MINIMIZE PARALLAX.
THIS CHANGE COUPLED WITH THE FACT THAT THESE METERS ARE LOCATED RELATIVELY 1
LOW ON THE VERTICAL PANEL WILL PREVENT A PARALLAX PROBLEM IN THE USE OF THESE METERS.
CATECORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-10) l 22
(
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0212 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: G 21 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.7.3.2E CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PROCESS COMPUTERS ALARM MESSAGES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
RADIATION MONITOR ALARM PRINTOUTS DO NOT IDENTIFY BY NUMBER WHICH MONITOR HAS ALARMED.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ALARM MESSAGE IS INTENDED TO DIRECT THE OPERATOR TO THE ROD MONITOR PANEL WHERE SPECIFIC INFORMATION IS AVAILADLE TO DETERMINE EXACT PARAMETER WHICH IS OUT OF SPECIFICATION. ROD MONITOR PANEL IS LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE
, CONTROL DOARD. --------__-_
1 __--------_----------
==------- ---_---_--_-__------= _
ACTION:
THE RADIATION MONITOR ALARM PRINTOUT LEGENDS ON THE SEQUENTIAL EVENTS RECORDER WILL DE REVISED TO SPECIFY THE RADIATION MONITOR NO. ASSOCIATED WITH EACH ALARM. -_-------_-_---_--_--
- - - - _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = _ - - - - = _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - - - - -___
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-01)
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECCRD HEO. NO. : 0222 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: O 29 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.7.1.8B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PROCESS COMPUTERS ACCESS AIDS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
__ == _____-__-__-_-___-__--_-________---- - _- _____________-_____________
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THAT PARAMETER GROUPS ON THE COMPUTER ARE NOT TITLED BY j CONTENT. ALSO, THERE IS NO SEARCH CAPABILITY FOR FINDING A PARAMETER POINT BY ENTERING COMPLETE OR PARTIAL DESCRIPTION.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE I
THE GROUP SELECTION MENU DOES PROVIDE A TITLE BY CONTENT FOR PRE-ESTABLISHED GROUPS. THIS TITLE IS INCLUDED WHEN THE GROUP IS EITHER PRINTED OR DISPLAYED.
ACTION:
j ACTION TAKEN: AN I/O SUMARY PRINTOUT IS MAINTAINED IN THE CONTROL ROOM FOR USE IN LOCATING PARAMETER POINTS. IF WAS INITIALLY SORTED BY NO. AND INPUT TERMINAL. AN ALPHADETIC SORT WAS ADDED WHICH MEETS THE REQUIRMENTS OF l GUIDELINE NO. 6.7.1.8.B _____________
_____________--_____________ - ==_____________== -- _ = ________-
, CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 6-I-86 l
l 4
na- ---,._ .,,,- .u-.,. _._., - . _ , - . - . , - . . . . , , . . , . . _ . . _ _ - . _ , . , - . . . , , , , , , - . , , . . _ - _ _ n----,._,, . - , . ,- , - - - . _ - _ . . ,,, _ , n _ .
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0226 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO. G 32 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. I . 1. 4 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION AND STORAGE
_ _---- --- ==-----------------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
==---------------------------------- ------------ -----
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THAT THE LOCATION OF SPECIFIC PROCEDURES IS DIFFICULT AND LOCATING SPECIFIC STEPS IS VERY DIFFICULT.
_- _= ----------------------------------------------------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE NEW COMPUTER GENERATED PROCEDURE INDEX, ORGANIZED BY PROCEDURE NO. AND TITLE, HAS DEEN IMPLEMENTED WHICH PROVIDES GREATER PROCEDURE LOCATION ABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH GUIDELINE 6.1.I.4
==- - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _----=_____--------------------
ACTION:
A NEW PROCEDURE WRITERS GUIDE IS DEING DEVELOPED WHICH WILL STANDARDIZE i PROCEDURE LAYOUT MAKING INDIVIDUAL STEPS EASIER TO LOCATE.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
i I
- -~ -. . _
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD i I
- HEO. NO. : 0230 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84
- TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION 4
1 REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: I3
INE 0700 GUIDEL NO.: 6.3.1.2C j
SUBAREA:
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE ALARM PARAMETER SELECTION ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS
_--_----------------------- 7-_------------------------------------------
, PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
i DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY: IT TAKES TIME TO SOME ANNUNCIATORS HAVE 20 OR MORE DIFFERENT CHECK POINTS.
J CHECK THE ONES WHICH DO NOT CLEARLY INDICATE A FAILURE.
RECOMMENDATION:
1 CHANGE i
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WINDOW WERE REVIEWED FOR THEIR INPUTS AND WILL DE CORR I WHERE REQUIRED. THE MAJOR CHANGES ARE TO ADD A " WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ALARM WINDOW". INCORPORATING A TIME DELAY INTO THE REFLASH CIRCUIT FROM THE LOCAL ALTHOUGH f
i RAD WASTE PANEL ANNUNCIATOR TO THE MAIN CONTROL ROOM ANNUNCIATOR.
f THIS CIRCUIT CONTAINS THE STATUS CONTACTS OF NINETY-SEVEN ALARM POINTS IN PARALLEL EACH ALARM POINTS STATUS MAY DE INDIVIDUALLY DETERMINED FR
! LOCAL ANNUNCIATOR. THIS IN TURN WOULD GIVE THE ROVING OPERATOR TIME TO I ANALYZE AND POSSIBLY CORRECT THE PROBLEM DEFORE IT IS TRANSMITTED TO THE CONTROL ROOM, WHEREBY ELIMINATING A POSSIBLE NUISANCE. ALSO ADD A "SECOND
! SAMPLE ANALYSIS ALARM WINDOW". PURCHASE AND PLACE A SATELLITE ANNUNCIATOR (THIRTY POINT) IN THE SAMPLING ROOM AND ADD A TIME DELAY IN THE CIRCUIT TO THE CONTROL ROOM IN CASES WHERE MULTI-INPUT WINDOWS REMAIN, A NEW SEQUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER WILL ALLOW FOR THE CAPABILITY TO REVEIW ALL ALARMS AND THEIR SEQUENCE (6.3.1.2C(2)) (REF: MAR 84-09-10-01)
CATEGORY:
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI I
l n
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0247 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.1A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS
---------------=_ =------ - ------- ----------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CN LIGHT INDICATORS
___====--------------=- ==-------------------- ---
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LIGHT INDICATORS DO NOT HAVE DUAL-BULB OR DUAL-FILAMENT LIGHT ASSEMBLIES.
BULB TEST CAPABILITY IS ONLY PROVIDED FOR CONTROL ROD POSITION INDICATION AND DIAMOND CONTROLS INDICATION.
------ =------------------- --------------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE LIGHT INDICATORS, WHICH CONSIST OF 2 OR 3 STATUS INDICATION LIGHTS PER DEVICE HAVE SELF-CHECKING CAPABILITY BECAUSE BY SYSTEM DESIGN ONE OF THE STATUS LIGHTS SHOULD DE ON AT ALL TIMES. THE OPERATOR CARE EASILY DETECT A BURNED OUT BULB IN THESE LIGHT INDICATORS.
_ ------------- ==----- _--------------- ----------
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 57
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0259 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
===----------------------------------------------------
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.3C i
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN ANNUNCIATOR PANELS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
AXES OF ANNUNCIATOR PANELS ARE NOT LABELED.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
COLUMN AND ROW NUMBER LABELS WILL BE ADDED TO INDICATE THE AXES OF EACH ANNUNCIATORS PANEL. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
==-----------------------------------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
l i
l l
28
HUMAN ENGINEERING.0BSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0260 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.3D CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ON ANNUNCIATOR PANELS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MATRICES G AND H EACH HAVE 64 TILES. MATRICES P AND G HAVE 80 TILES.
MATRICES N AND 0 HAVE 60 TILES.
RECOMMENDATION:
, CHANGE ALTHOUGH THE DENSITY IS GREATER THAN SUGGESTED THE OPERATOR MUST ACKNOWLEDGE ALARMS FROM IN FRONT OF THE PANEL THEREBY ASSURING PROPER ATTENTION.
ACTION:
t l ALL ANNUNCIATORS POINTS WERE PRIORITIZED INTO 4 PRIORITIES. ANNUNCIATORS NOT REGUIRING IMMEDIATE OPERATORS ATTENTION (PRIORITY 4) WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATORS (ALTHOUGH STILL AVAILABLE ON THE SEGUENCE - OF - EVENTS RECORDER). THE RESULT OF THIS IS THAT THE ABOVE MATRICIES WILL HAVE THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF ACTIVE WINDOWS: MATRIX - G H,N,0,P,G. ACTIVE WINDOWS -
28,47,29,44,37,20 ALL OTHER WINDOWS WILL DE INACTIVE AND BLANK ALTHOUGH THEY MAY DE USED IN THE FULTURE. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI i
I HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0261 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE 4 DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVLY
-_----__-----_-------_-=_
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.1B i
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUSAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SF EDG.3B START CKT A/B DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LIGHTS ARE NOT BRIGHT ENOUGH WHEN ON TO BE CLEARLY RECOGNIZED AS ON.
-------------- ------------------------------------- a----------------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE
- OPRIGNAL LIGHTING SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WHILE WORK WAS BEING PERFORMED IN THE CONTROL ROOM AND LIGHTS AND DIFFUSER DID NOT REPRESENT NORMAL CONDITION. ALL l LIGHTING WAS RESTORED TO NORMAL AND A NEW SURVEY PERFORMED. THE CONTROL ROOM l ILLUMINATION LEVELS WERE f1EASURED AND ARE RECORDED IN FOOTCANDLES. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF SEVENTY READINGS RECORDED. REPLACING THE MISSING DIFFUSERS ON THE NORMAL LIGHTING FIXTURES GREATLY REDUCED GLARE ON THE MAIN CONTROL BOARD.
THE ONLY GLARE PROBLEM THAT EXISTS IS ON THE SPDS MONITORS LOCATED IN THE VERTICAL SECTION AT THE CENTER OF THE BOARD. THE TUBES WERE REMOVED FROM THE LIGHTING FIXTURE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE SPDS MONITORS WHICH REDUCED THE GLARE ON THE MONITORS AND STILL PROVIDED SUFFICIENT LIGHTING.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 b
1- . - _ . _ - _ - _ . , _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ - _
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0266 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
------------------------------------= -------------------
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.3.3C GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS
=_ =------------------------------------- ----
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO . LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS
==---------------- ==-----
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
NO LAMP TEST OR DUAL LAMP / DUAL FILAMENT CAPABILITY IS PROVIDED.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THESE BACKLIT PUSHBUTTONS ARE IN PAIRS SUCH THAT ONE IS ALWAYS LIT. BY THIS SYSTEM DESIGN THE OPERATORS CAN EASILY DETECT A BURNED OUT BULB.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED u
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 9/
. HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0267 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/3P/84 1
TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION i
REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY 1
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 CUIDELINE NO. : 6.4.3.3C GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS
\ ------------------------------ =---------------------------------------------
I PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LEGEND COVERS ARE NOT KEYED TO PREVENT THE POSSIBILITY OF INTERCHANGING COVERS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE l ACTION:
l THE LEGEND COVERS FOR THE PUSHBUTTONS ON THE WESTINGHOUSE TURBINE, EHC AND i REHEATER CONTROL PANELS WILL DE MARKED WITH POSITIONALLY SIGNIFICANT IDENTIFICATION TO PREVENT THE POSSIBILITY OF INTERCHANGING COVERS.
! CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-05) i 4
r 1
r i
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0268 '
PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.6E CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS COLOR CODING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO MIMIC LINE DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LIGHT DLUE FOR STEAM DOES NOT PROVIDE HIGH CONTRAST.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE i
ACTION:
MANY PROCESSES ARE REPRESENTED IN MIMIC ON THIS SECTION OF THE TO PANEL.
EACH PROCESS WILL BE A DIFFERENT COLOR OR LIGHT BLUE WITH TRACERS TO CONTRAST IT. LIGHT DLUE IS NUMBER 6 IN TABLE 6.5-7 IN NUREG 0700 AS ONE OF l THE COLORS OF MAXIMUM CONTRAST.
CATECORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-10) t l
I I
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0270 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY 1
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.9.1.1C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUDAREA:
CONTROL-DISPLAY INTEGRATION SINGLE CONTROL AND DISPLAY PAIRS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
DEMARCATION WOULD HELP DN LEFT SIDE OF THIS PANEL TO SEPARATE GROUPS OF SIMILAR CONTROLS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
DEMARCATION LINES WILL DE ADDED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HUMAN FACTORS GUIDELINES.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-05) 91
HUMAN ENGIfjEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0276 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/B4 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.1D CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ED ES LEGEND LIGHTS DESCRIPTION OF DISCPEPANCY:
EQUIPMENT STATUS LEGEND LIGHTS CHANGE FROM BLUE TO AMBER TO ALERT OPERATORS TO UNFAVORABLE STATUS. ANNUNCIATORS SHOULD BE USED TO INDICATE THE STATUS CHANGE.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE ES ACTUATION ANNUNCIATOR IS AVAILABLE ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED THESE EGUIPMENT STATUS LEGEND LIGHTS CHANGE FROM BLUE TO AMBER TO ALERT THE OPERATOR OF A CHAN0E IN EQUIPMENT STATUS FROM ES POSITION.THE LIGHTS DO NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE UNFAVORA3LE STATUS. THE ANNUNCIATORS ARE AVAILABLE TO INDICATE "UNFAVORADLE EQUIPMENT STATUS OF ES ACTUATED EGUIPMENT.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
)
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0277 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
_--___---__-_-------------_--_---_-------------------------- =---------------
REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
.---------------------------------.--== -----------------------------------
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.7.2.1H GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
, PROCESS COMPUTERS CRT DISPLAY CHARACTERISTICS PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SF ADDS CONSOLE DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LUMINANCE, CONTRAST, AND COLOR CANNOT BE ADJUSTED ON THE ADDS CONSOLE.
_------_--------= - -----------_---- ==------__-----------__ --------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THIS DISPLAY IS USED FOR DATA REQUESTS ONLY AND IS NOT USED TO DISPLAY OPERATING INFORMATION.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 i
9
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0282 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION t __________________________________________ __________________________________
j REVIEWER: LIDDLE
} DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.1.5.3F !
1 l CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
- CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE ILLUMINATION j _______________________________________________________________________________
l PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CN l DECCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CLARE INTERFERES WITH THE READABILITY OF DISPLAYS, LABELS, OR INDICATORS.
J RECOMMENDATION:
- NO CHANGE
- ORIGINAL LIGHTING SURVEY WAS PERFORMED WHILE WORK WAS BEING PERFORMED IN THE I CONTROL ROOM. LIGHTS AND DIFFUSERS DID NOT REPRESENT NORMAL CONDITIONS. ALL I LIGHTING WAS RESTORED TO NORMAL CONDITIONS AND A NEW SURVEY PERFORMED. THE l CONTROL ROOM ILLUMINATION LEVELS WERE MEASURED AND ARE RECORDED IN j FOOTCANDLES. THERE ARE A TOTAL OF SEVENTY READINGS RECORDED. REPLACING THE
! MISSING DIFFUSERS ON THE NORMAL LIGHTING FIXTURES GREATLY REDUCED QLARE ON i THE MAIN CONTROL BOARD. THE ONLY QLARE PROBLEM THAT EXISTS IS ON THE SPDS MONITORS LOCATED IN THE VERTICAL SECTION AT THE CENTER OF THE BOARD. THE TUBES WERE REMOVED FROM THE LIGHTING FIXTURE DIRECTLY ABOVE THE SPDS MONITORS, WHICH REDUCED THE GLARE ON THE MONITORS AND STILL PROVIDED SUFFICIENT LIGHTING.
ACTION: *
[
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED i
l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 4 l
l 97
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD
't HEO.NO.: 0286 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 -
TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE i
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY j ___________________________________________________________________________ _
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.1.28 i
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
J ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ALARM PARAMETER SELECTION
______________________________________= ______ _____________________
! PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
l GN ANNUNCIATORS i
i DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
]1 SOME ALARMS REQUIRE THE OPERATOR TO DIRECT AN AUXILIARY OPERATOR TO A GIVEN PLANT LOCATION FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION.
3 e
RECOMMENDATION:
- CHANGE THERE ARE SATELITE ANNUNCIATORS LOCATED THROUGHOUT THE PLANT TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF UNNECESSARY ALARMS IN THE CONTROL ROOM. THE ACTION REQUIRED BY I THESE ALARMS ARE NOT SAFETY RELATED NOR TIME DEPENDENT. AUXILIARY OPERATORS ARE PRESENT AT THESE LOCATIONS TO HANDLE THE PROBLEMS
! ACTION:
SATELLITE ANNUNCIATOR STATIONS WHICH HAVE AUXILIARY OPERATORS PRESENT WILL j HAVE A TIME DELAY ADDED SUCH THAT THE CONTROL ROOM ANNUNCIATORS WILL NOT ALARM IF THE SATELLITE ANNUNCIATOR IS ACKNOWLEDGED WITHIN A SPECIFIED TIME.
- (REF
- MAR 84-08-10-15)
! CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 1
l i
I
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0287 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 i TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY 4
DOCUMENT NO.* 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.1.2C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
, ANNUNCIATOR WAPNING SYSTEMS ALARM PARAMETER SELECTION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.:'
COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN DRAIN POT LEVEL HIGH, DRAIN VALVES NOT CLOSED, ATMOSPHERIC HIGH RAD, ATMOSPHERIC LOW RAD, EXTRACTION NON-RETURN VALVE TRIP, CDSTE DEMIN PNL
'; ALARM, HYDROGEN PNL ALARM, LOOSE PARTS MONITORING, ROD DRIVE PWR FAULT, ICS-NNI TROUBLE, RC PRESS HTR GROUP (3 ALARMS)
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE ADOVE ALARMS HAVE MULTIPLE INPUTS AND SPECIFIC INFORMATION IS NOT AVAILABLE IN THE CONTROL ROOM.
RECOMMEND ATION:
CHANGE i
CHANGE. ALARMS ARE GROUPED TO MINIMIZE OPERATOR DISTRACTION. OPERATOR TRAINING AND PROCEDURES DIRECT THE OPERATOR TO TAKE SPECIFIC ACTIONS.
l ACTION:
! ALL ANNUNCIATORS WERE REVIEWED FOR THEIR IMPUTS AND WILL BE CORRECTED TO 3 INCLUDE THE PROPER INFORMATION AND TO USE THE STANDARD 3 LINE FORMAT: THE
! FIRST LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PLANT SYSTEM / COMPONENT", THE SECOND LINE TO
< CONTAIN THE " PARAMETER", AND THE THIRD LINE TO CONTAIN THE " STATUS".
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-01) i
?? .
--n- ,--,,-_----.-r,..--<-,~.,-,mnm,w-w-.>,--n.---~-m,--w,- ,w,,. - m , w r w, - - - - - - - -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0291 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.2.18 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS SIGNAL DETECTION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN ANNUNCIATORS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ADJUSTING SIGNAL INTENSITY IS NOT CONTROLLED BY ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL WILL DE DEVELOPED FOR ADJUSTMENT OF ANNUNCIATOR SIGNAL INTENSITY.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/00
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0295 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION l
REVIEWER: LIDDLE '
4 DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.3E CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
- ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES i
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
. CN ANNUNCIATORS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OUT-OF-SERVICE ALARMS ARE NOT LABELED ON CONTROL PANEL.
j ----------__---------__-----------------_-------------------- - - -____------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE OUT OF SERVICE ALARMS ARE ENTERED IN AN ALARM LOG AND A YELLOW OUT-OF-SERVICE STICKER PER PLANT PROCEDURE LP113 IS PLACED ON THE TILE TO ENSURE PROMPT RECOGNITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH 6.3.3.3E.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATTON SCHEDULE:
i 4 COMPLETE I
i
.l I
i
/ 01
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0300 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
---_----------= ---- ---_-------------------------------------___ __----_
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.1.2 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LADELS AND LOCATION AIDS HIERARCHICAL SCHEME PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CN , LABELS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - = _ _ -------------- ---
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
A HIERARCHICAL LABELING SCHEME IS NOT USED CONSISTENTLY.
_------------- _ =-
.---------=
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
ALL LA3ELS, NAMEPLATES AND ENGRAVING ON THE CONTROL BOARD WILL DE REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE TO GUIDELINE 6.6.1.2 (REF: MAR 84-08-10)
_-------_--------_------_---- -------_------- =---------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI I
J
/D2.
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0301 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.2.1A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS PLACEMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN LABELS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MOST DESCRIPTIVE LADELS ARE BELOW COMPONENTS. OPERATOR'S HAND OBSCURES LADELS DURING OPERATION OF CONTROLS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
ALL NAMEPLATES AND LABELS WILL BE REVIEWED AND REPOSITIONED ADOVE COMPONENTS WHERE SPACE PERMITS. (REF: MAR 84-08-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/03
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0303 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION 1
REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.6.2.!F CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
! LADELS AND LOCATION AIDS PLACEMENT i PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN LABELS i
1 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
- ADJACENT LADELS ARE NOT SEPARATED BY SUFFICIENT SPACE AND MAY BE READ AS ONE CONTINUOUS LABEL. ,
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE i ACTION:
ALL NAMEPLATES AND LADELS ON THE CONTROL BOARD WERE REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE i TO THE CR-3 ABBREVIATION LIST AND FOR HUMAN FACTORS CONSIDERATIONS AND i CORRECTIONS WILL DE MADE WHERE REQUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10)
I CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
I 4 REFUEL VI i
f i
i
/04
. _ _ _ . . - _ _ .,__.-__ _ - - .-.y . , . . , __ _ , , . . _ , , _ , . _ _ . . _ _ , , - ~ _ . . . . _ _ . _ ,.m_,.._ - - - - . ~ .
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0327 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.2F CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ALARM RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
~
CN ANNUNCIATORS DESCRIP TION OF DISCREPANCY:
ANNUNCIATOR TILES WHICH MUST BE ILLUMINATED FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME DURING NORMAL OPERATIONS ARE NOT DISTINCTIVELY CODED.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE CR3 HAS ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES IN PLACE TO DEFEAT SUCH ANNUNCIATORS IF REQUIRED (REF 6.3.3.2F(2))
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED f
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
I 4
i l
I f
I
/07 1- -
I l
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l
HEO.NO.: 0332 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE
..-= _------------------------------------------
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.7.2.1D GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PROCESS COMPUTERS CRT DISPLAY CHARACTERISTICS
, PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN PROCESS COMPUTERS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CONTRAST DETWEEN CHARACTERS AND SCREEN IS 11: 5. MINIMUM REQUIRED IS 15: 1.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THERE SCENARIO IS ONLY BACKUP FOR THE PARAMETERS DISPLAYED ON METERS AND RECORDERS ON THE MAIN CONTROL BOARDS. IF THE OPERATOR WANTS MORE DETAILS OF THE DACK INFORMATION HE CAN CALL IT UP AND ODTAIN A HARD COPY FROM THE PRINTER.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 i
i
/06
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0334 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.7.2.29 1
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PROCESS COMPUTERS SYMBOLS AND CHARACTERS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID., COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN . PROCESS COMPUTERS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
DOT-MATRIX FOR CHARACTERS IS 3 X 8 AND SHOULD DE 7 X 9.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE DISPLAY IS READABLE FOR THE OPERATORS AS IT IS. THE ONLY DOT-MATRIX DEVICES ARE THE 2 DEC WRITERS. ONE WRITER IS AN AUXILIARY UNIT USED FOR DACKUP INFORMATION (CORE IMBALANCE) APPLICATIONS; THE OTHER WRITER IS USED TO PRINT ALL THE ALARMS WHICH SUPPLEMENTS THE CRT USED TO DISPLAY THE LAST 16 ALARNS.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
/07
1 i HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0337 l
PLANT: CR3 I DATE: 07/31/84 l TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY 1
1 DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. 5. 3. 3A i
i
, GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUSAREA:
- VISUAL DISPLAYS LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS 1
4 _______________________________________________________________________________
I PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG E. H. TURBINE CONTROL STATUS LIGHTS (GREEN) l i
! DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
) ILLUMINATION OF LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS IS 24% LESS THAN SURROUNDING PANELJ l SHOULD DE 10% BRIGHTER THAN SURROUNDING PANEL.
i RECOMMENDATION:
i NO CHANGE j THE LEGEND LIGHT IS ONLY USED WHEN THE OPERATOR IS IN FRONT OF THE PANEL j WHERE THE LIGHT IS CLEARLY VISIBLE. THE ILLUMINATION LEVEL OF THE LEGEND
} LIGHT INDICATORS ON THIS SECTION OF THE BOARD WAS REMEASURED USING A PRECISION LIGHT METER. WITH THE CONTROL ROOM LIGHTS IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF THE CONTROL 30ARD DIMMED, THESE LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS MET THE CRITERIA OF -
I GUIDELINE 6. 5. 3: 3A THAT THEIR ILLUMINATION LEVEL BE 10% GREATER THAN THE I SURROUNDING PANEL. THE OPERATIONS SHIFT SUPERVISOR HAS ADMINISTRATIVE t AUTHORITY TO ADJUST THE CONTROL ROOM LIGHTS TO A SATISFACTORY LEVEL FOR CONTROL DOARD OPERATION.
j _______________________________________________________________________________
ACTION:
- NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED i
, CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 4 i
l
(
4 f
d i
/02
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0338 PLANT: CR3
< DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION 1
REVIEWER: LIDDLE
< DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.5.3.3A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS PANEL /WORMSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PO BLUE STATUS LIGHTS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ILLUMINATION OF LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS IS 33% LESS THAN SURROUNDING PANELS SHOULD DE 10% BRIGHTER THAN SURROUNDING PANEL.
l
) RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE OPERATORS REPORTED NO PROBLEMS IN READING THESE LIGHTS WHEN THEY ARE ON. THE I ILLUMINATION LEVEL OF THE LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS ON THIS SECTION OF OF THE BOARD WAS REMEASURED USING A PRECISION LIGHT METER. WITH THE CONTROL ROOM LIGHTS IMMEDIATELY IN FRONT OF THE CONTROL BOARD DIMMED THESE LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS MET THE CRITERIA OF GUIDELINE 6.5.'3.3A THAT THEIR ILLUMINATION LEVEL DE 10% GREATER THAN THE SURROUNDING PANEL. THE OPERATIONS SHIFT SUPERVISOR HAS ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY TO ADJUST THE CONTROL ROOM LIGHTS TO A SATISFACTORY LEVEL FOR CONTROL BOARD OPERATION.
I ACTION:
! NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED CATECORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 a
)
4 i
i I
i l
I i
4
/07 i
-___ _ _ _ _ _.._.. _ . _ _ . _ . - . _ _ _ _ . _ . _ ~ - . __ _ _ , . _ . _ _ _ - _ , - . . _ _ . _
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0342 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/01/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: HITZ/KUPIEC/GADDY DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.1.1B CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT ASSIGNING PANEL CONTENTS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS . MAKEUP PUMP MIMIC
== ---------- ___ ------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
IN FOLLOW-UP ACTION STEP A5.0 OF PROCEDURE EP-260. THE MAKEUP PUMP MIMIC USED TO CHECK FOR PRESSURE INCREASE IS ON PSA PANEL, BUT PUMPS ARE ON ESF PANEL. ,
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = . - - = = = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = - -------------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE DISCHARGE PRESSURE INDICATION IS ONLY A BACKUP CHECK FOR PROPER SYSTEM FUNCTION IN THIS PROCEDURE. ALSO, MAKE-UP PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE INDICATION IS NON-SAFETY RELATED AND SHOULD NOT BE PUT ON ES PANEL. THE NORMAL METHOD OF VERIFICATION OF PROPER SYSTEM OPERATION WHEN USING EP-260 IS TO MONITOR THE HPI FLOW METERS WHICH ARE LOCATED ON THE ES PANEL.
_____====------------- -------- ---
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
===____--_==__ --- _ -----------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
//0
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0346 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/01/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: HITZ/KUPIEC/ CADDY DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.1.1B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT ASSIGNING PANEL CONTENTS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES MAKEUP TANK OUTLET VALVE - MUV64 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
IN FOLLOW-UP ACTION STEP A6.0 OF PROCEDURE EP-260, MAKEUP TANK OUTLET VALVE SHOULD DE ON MAKEUP TANK MIMIC (PSA PANEL) RATHER THAN ON BWST MIMIC. (ES PANEL) 1 RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THIS PROCEDURE DEALS WITH INADEGUOTE DECAY HEAT REMOVAL (I.E., LOSS OF CORE COOLING). STEP A6.0 DEALS WITH PROVIDING AN ALTERNATE SOURCE OF WATER TO HPI IN AN EMERGENCY. THE MAKEUP TANK OUTLET VALVE (MUV-64) IS PROPERLY POSITIONED ON THE ES PANEL WITH OTHER RELATED INLET VALVE CONTROLS AND FLOW INDICATORS MU-23-F14&12 FOR FLOW VERIFICATION IN THE MIMIC TO SUPPLY HPI WATER FROM EITHER THE MUT ON BWST.
t ACTION:
l NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED
=------------ =---------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
///
1
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0347 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/02/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: HITZ/KUPIEC/ CADDY DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 CUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.1B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO DE DISPLAYED PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES - PRESSURIZER LEVEL INDICATION
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ - - - - - - - - _ - = = ==-__-__-- --- ---_----_.._---_-
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS WOULD LIKE A PRESSURIZER LEVEL METER.
__--- ---___---_-____---___---___- = = _ _ - - -
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
______--___-________-__---__-_---_____--- - _==--_____-- - _ _ __________
1 ACTION:
THE PRESSURIZER WATER LtVEL RECORDER, A BAILEY METER CO. TYPE WR ON WHICH IT IS DIFFICULT TO READ INSTANTANEOUS VALUES, IS CURRENTLY LOCATED ON THE ICS PANEL. THIS RECORDER WILL BE REPLACED WITH TWO SINGLE PEN RECORDERS WITH l ANALOG INDICATORS ON THE FRONT OF THE RECORDER. THE NEW RECORDERS WILL STILL DE LOCATED ON THE ICS PANEL IMMEDIATELY TO THE LEFT OF THE PRESSURIZER LEVEL CONTROL STATION. HOWEVER, THIS LOCATION IS ALSO ADJACENT TO THE ES PANEL SO THAT THE RECORDER INDICATOR WILL BE EASILY VISIBLE TO THE ES PANEL OPERATOR.
(REF: MAR 84-08-10-04)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/ / 2.
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0348 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/02/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: HITZ/KUPIEC/GADDY l
DATA SOURCE: VERIFICATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.2A
---------------- --- l CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC STEAM GENERATOR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
IN STEP 2.3 OF PROCEDURE VP-580, OPERATORS WOULD LIKE A METER WITH A GREATER DEGREE OF PRECISION ( I . E. , SCALE GRADUATIONS) IN THE RANGE FROM O TO 100 INCHES, INSTEAD OF LESS PRECISE PRESENT RANGE (0-250 INCHES).
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
==-- ------------ _--------------------- - --
ACTION:
TO MEET REGUIREMENTS OF R.G.1.9.7, STEAM GENERATORS A&D LEVEL WILL DE INDICATED ON ICS PANEL AS FOLLOWS: A) OPERATING LEVEL WITH 1 DUAL PEN INDICATING RECORDER (RANGE 100-394"H2O) B) START UP LEVEL WITH 1 DUAL PEN INDICATING RECORDER (RANGE O-150"H2O) (REF: MAR 84-08-10-04)
. - -------- __ ___-------=
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
(
l
//3
^ '-- --
. . . . . . . . . - . . .-~
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0355 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATU3: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.4A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS PRINTING ON THE DISPLAY FACE PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC ROD GROUP POSITION INDICATION DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ROD GROUP POSITION METERS ARE LABELED 5, 6, 7, AND 8. A SWITCH CAN PROVIDE INDICATION FOR 1, 2, 3, AND 4 ON THE SAME METERS, BUT THEY AR,E NOT LABELED 1, 2, 3, AND 4.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE SWITCH IS MARKED " SAFETY" FOR ROD GROUPS 1,2,3,4 AND " REGULATE" FOR ROD GROUPS 5,6,7 AND 8. OPERATORS ARE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE SWITCH, THIS IS A BACK UP AVERAGE INDICATION TO INDIVIDUAL ROD POSITION INDICATION.
l ACTION:
THE (4) GROUP AVERAGE INDICATION METERS WILL HAVE THEIR LABELS REVISED TO INCLUDE. THE ROD GROUPS 1,2,3, AND 4 WHEN THE SWITCH IS IN THE " SAFETY POSITION. THE LADELS WILL BE REVISED AS FOLLOWS: FROM - 5,6,7,8 TO - 1 OF 5, 2 OR 6, 3 OF 7, 4 OR 8. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-04)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/ /<7
HUMAN ENGINEERIN0 OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0359 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
= ---------------------------------------------------------
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.2.38 CUIDELINE AREA: CUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT LAYOUT CONSISTENCY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ACCORDING TO TABLETOP SURVEY, MIMIC IS MIRROR-IMAGED.
- - _ _ - - . - _ - _ _ _ - - - __==-__--- __- - - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - - - -
l RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE ALTHOUGH THE MIMIC IS MIRROR-IMAGED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH PLANT EQUIPMENT AND FLOW DIAGRAMS WHICH ARE USED IN TRAINING. THE INDICATORS AND CONTROLS IN EACH SECTIONS ARE NOT MIRROR-IMAGED.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED
[ CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
.[
/ / 5'
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0364 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION l
---------- l REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.3.3D CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS LEGEND PUSHBUTTONS
---__-_-__-_---_-------= --________------ - -_-_----------_----- -_-_-
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS ,
EFIC/ICC MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ACCORDING TO TABLETOP SURVEY, BARRIERS ARE NOT USED BETWEEN CONTIGUOUS BAILEY TT-20 HAND / AUTO CONTROL STATION PUSHBUTTONS.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE OPERATOR WOULD IMMEDIATELY KNOW A MISTAKE HAD BEEN MADE AND COULD CORRECT IT WITH MINIMAL EFFECT ON THE PLANT OPERATION. OPERATOR TRAINING WOULD PRECLUDE THIS FROM HAPPENING.
=== .----------------------------
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED l
THESE HAND / AUTO CONTROL STATIONS WITH CONTIGUOUS BLACKLIGHTED PUSHBUTTONS ARE NOT PROVIDED WITH BARRIERS BETWEEN PUSHBUTTONS BY VENDOR DESIGN. THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF MIS-CONTROL BY ACCIDENTAL ACTUATION OF AN ADJACENT PUSHBUTTON BECAUSE THE TWO MANUAL CONTROL INPUT PUSHBUTTONS ARE SEPARATED BY THE TWO PUSHDUTTONS WHICH SELECT MODE OF CONTROL, I E. AUTOMATIC OR MANUAL.
THE MIS-SELECTION OF MODE OF CONTROL WILL BE READILY APPARANT BECAUSE THESE PUSHBUTTONS ILLUMINATE WHEN THEY HAVE BEEN DEPRESSED, AND WILL NOT INITIALLY RESULT IN ANY CONTROL ACTIONS.
=-- _ __--- -------------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 i/6
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0365 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: VERIFICATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.1.1C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT ASSIGNING PANEL CONTENTS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS EFIC/ICC MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ACCORDING TO TABLETOP SURVEY, COMPONENTS ARE NOT GROUPED BY IMPORTANCE AND FREQUENCY OF USE.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE COMPONENTS ARE GROUPED BY SYSTEM FLOW AND FUNCTION.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED HUMAN FACTORS ENGINEERING HAS REVIEWED THE COMPONENTS ON THE PSA PANEL AND HAS DETERMINED THAT ARE GROUPED BY SYSTEM FUNCTION AND TASK SEGUENCE AND ARE ALSO LOCATED CONSISTENT WITH THEIR OPERATIONAL IMPORTANCE TO PLANT SAFETY AND FREQUENCY-OF USE.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
//7
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD I
l HEO. NO. : 0375 l PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
! REVIEWER: GADDY 1
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.5.1.2 GUIDELINE AREA: QUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS , EFIC/ICC MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ACCORDING TO TABLETOP SURVEY, SAFETY-GRADE STEAM GENERATOR LEVEL INDICATORS TO BE INSTALLED ARE DENSITY-COMPENSATED, WHILE THE EXISTING INDICATORS ARE NOT. HOWEVER, THE OPERATIONAL DIFFERENCES IN READINGS DURING THE EXPECTED CONDITIONS WHEN EMERGENCY FEEDWATER IS IN USE SHOULD BE NINOR AND IN THE CONSERVATIVE DIRECTION.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
( LABELS WILL BE ADDED ADJACENT TO EACH LEVEL INDICATOR DESCRIBING THE l COMPENSATION USED FOR THAT PARTICULAR VERIABLE. OPERATORS WILL BE TRAINED TO UNDERSTAND THE VARIOUS COMPENSATION METHODS, HOW THEY EFFECT THE MEASURED I VARIABLE, AND TO RECOGNIZE THE DIFFERENCE IN INDICATION. THE EMERGENCY OPERATING PROCEDURES WILL BE REVISED TO ADVISE THE OPERATORS AS TO WHICH INDICATOR SHOULD BE THE PRIMARY SOURCE OF INFORMATION FOR EACH EMERGENCY SCENERIO.
---_-------------------___ - =------_----- _ ._--__---- - - - _ - _ - - - - - _____==-
ACTION:
CHANGE
- - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ - - -------_--
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
O REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-10) 1
// /
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0376 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
__------------- _ -------------- ==--------------
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. 8. 2. 3 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT LAYOUT CONSISTENCY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS EFIC/ICC MODIFICATION DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ACCORDING TO TABLETOP SURVEY, 12 METERS ARE ON BENCHBOARD OF THIS PANEL, WHICH IS INCONSISTENT WITH GENERAL CONTROL ROOM LAYOUT.
= ------------------------------------------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THIS LAYOUT IS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PROPER CONTROL / DISPLAY INTEGRATION.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED OTHER PANELS HAVE A SIMILIAR NUMBER OF METERS ON THE BENCHBOARD. THESE METERS ARE NOT PART OF A RE-OCCURRING CONTROL GROUP AND ARE FUNCTIONALLY GROUPED WITH THEIR APPLICABLE SYSTEMS CONTROLS. _ ----------------------
= _ .
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4
/ / 9'
l HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0377 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/08/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 CUIDELINE NO.: 6.9.1.2C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL-DISPLAY INTEGRATION MULTIPLE CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS
_ = - _ _ = _ _ - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _- -------------- _ -------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC TRANSMITTER SELECTIONS, T-HOT, T-COLDWR, T-COLDNR, CONTROLLING TEMP SELECT, PRESS LEVEL, PRESS TEMP, OTSG PRESSURE
==__ _ -------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE LABELS DO NOT CLEARLY INDICATE WHICH INDICATORS / RECORDERS ARE AFFECTED BY THE DISPLAY SELECTORS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
-----------------------------__ - _------------- =-------
ACTION:
THE SWITCHES LISTED ABOVE, KNOWN AS "X-Y" SELECTOR SWITCHES. WILL BE REGROUPED TO CORRECT A MIRROR IMAGING PROBLEM. DEMARCATION AND CLARIFYING LADELS WILL DE ADDED AS REGUIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HUMAN FACTORS GUIDELINES.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-04)(MAR 84 /20
APPENDIX C HE0s which were identified by the SAIC Evaluation Report as specifying "futher study required" in the FPC DCRDR Summary Report. This listing included HE0s 0011, 0014, 0018, 0021, 0024, 0027, 0034, 0035, 0036, 0038, 0041, 0047, 0048, 0049, 0050, 0051, 0052, 0053, 0054, 0055, 0060, 0066, 0076, 0083, 0109, 0114, 0123, 0147, 0150, 0156, 0164, 0165, 0166, 0167, 0168, 0169, 0170, 0171, 0176, 0178, 0181, 0188, 0189, 0190, 0199, 0201, 0209, 0210, 0213, 0214, 0216, 0218, 0219, 0220, 0234, 0245, 0253, 0275, 0289, 0290, 0292, 0294, 0307, 0312, 0313, 0324, 0345, 0351, 0353, 0354, 0358, 0378.
NOTE: All HE0s listed above have been subjected to further review since submittal of the FPC DCRDR Summary Report and corrective action or justification has been added. HE0s 109 and 147 were also listed under Appendix A of the Evaluation Report and were included under that Appendix.
l Low (AppendixC)D1-3
/21
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0011 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: TURNEY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.4.1A
~
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS ROTARY CONTROL DESIGN PRINCIPLES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
VR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
A' CONTROL IS LABELED O= FULL RECIRC. ROTARY CONTROL SETTINGS SHOULD INCREASE IN VALUE WITH A CLOCKWISE ROTATION.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
--== =---------------= ------------- ------------------ ---- ----
ACTION:
THIS LABEL WILL DE CORRECTED FROM "O - FULL RECIRC" TO "O - MINIMAL FLOW TO R. B. " REF: MAR 84-08-10-07
______==-------== -------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
l l
l
/2.7_
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0014 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: TURNEY
__-----_-- =----__-------__-----_----_-_------------ -- -----_----- -
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.2A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS SPECIFIC RECORDER TYPES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
VR
-_----__-_---------------_-------- __----- __==-- --_--- -------____---
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LABELS FOR PARAMETER IDENTIFICATION ON THE GRAPHIC RECORDERS,ARE NOT CLEAR.
===-- ___=------------------ ------ __ _ - - ------------------~.---
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
= ------------------------------------ _=-----------------------
ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS WITH PROPER SCALES AND POINT IDENTIFICATION. ALL LABELS WILL BE REVIEWED AND CORRECTED AS REQUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07 & MAR 84-08-10-10)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----------==--- - --
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
O REFUEL VI
/ 2. 3
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0018 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.2A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS SPECIFIC RECORDER TYPES
------------== _ --------------------- ----
PANEL /WORKETATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
..------------------------= -_------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE LADELS FOR GRAPHIC RECORDER POINT / CHANNEL / LOCATION IDENTIFICATION ARE ILLEGIDLE AND ARE PLACED BELOW THE RECORDERS SO THAT THEY ARE OBSCURRED FROM VIEW.
---== ____-------------- -------------==___=-----------------------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
-----------------------------===___ ----------- -------
ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL DE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS WITH PROPER POINT IDENTIFICATION AND CORRECTED LABELS. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-06)
====_=--------------------------- _=-- -----= _---------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 124-
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0021 PLANT: CR3 1 DATE: 02/14/84 l TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION i REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY i
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.5.4.1A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS
, PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RM RM-R1, RM-R2, RM-R3, RM-R4, RM-RS, RM-R6, SS-120-CR CONDENSATE PUMP DISCHARGE / MAIN CONDENSER HOTWELL, NI-10-NR INCORE DETECTOR #1, NI-11-NR INCORE DETECTOR #2, BS-65-PR BORATED WATER STORAGE TANK 4
LEVEL DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THESE LEEDS AND NORTHRUP SPEEDOMAX GRAPHIC RECORDERS DO NOT PROVIDE CLEAR, DISTINCT, AND RELIABLE MARKINGS.
I RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL DE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS WITH IMPROVED SCALE MARKING. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-06)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
J 4 REFUEL VI s
i i
i l
l
/ 2' T 4
i HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD i
HEO. NO. : 0024 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.1K GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID. : COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RM SS-120-CR. BS-65-PR
__---_-------_---_-_ _ _-------------_--_---_-__ =---_-------- -
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
PAPER NOTES ON THE FRONTS OF THESE GRAPHIC RECORDERS OBSTRUCT READING THEM.
I
< ---------_--._--_------ -__-- __ _==-----_- -_---_--_- --------_----__
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE i
ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS SUCH THAT EXPLANITORY NOTES ARE NOT REGUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-06)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/2G
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0027 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY '
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.1.1.5C GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE SPARE PARTS} OPERATING EXPENDABLES)AND TOOLS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
A TOOL IS NEEDED FOR INDICATOR LIGHT REPLACEMENT. SEVERAL OPERATORS HAVE RECEIVED SHOCKS OR BURNS WHILE REPLACING INDICATOR BULBS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
l l THE LIGHT CIRCUIT WILL BE REDESIGNED TO ELIMINATE THE SHOCK HAZARDS. (REF:
MAR 86-05-01-01). NEW 125 VDC LIGHT CIRCUITS ADDED TO THE MAIN CONTROL BOARD IN THE FUTURE WILL INCORPORATE THIS DESIGN PROVISION.
, ------------- =-_ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 JUNE 1986 i
i n
I 2 ~l
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0034 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY
=- =- --------------------------------
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. 6.1.1 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS NEED FOR LABELING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN
==__ -------------------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MANY LADELS ARE NOT ADEGUATELY DESCRIPTIVE. .
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
, -------------------- _===_ -------------------------------------------- -
ACTION:
OVERALL CONTROL BOARD LABELLING WILL BE REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE TO CR3 ABBREVIATION LIST AND PROPER DESCRIPTIONS AND WILL DE REVISED AS REQUIRED.
(REF: MAR 84-08-10-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
/1f
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0035 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.2.1 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LADELS AND LOCATION AIDS PLACEMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
VARIOUS CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS WHICH PROVIDE IDENTICAL FUNCTIONS HAVE DIFFERENT LABELS.
-_=__-_--------_--- _---
_ - - - - _ - - - - = = = - -__- =-----_-----_----__-- --
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
_---- ==_______----- - ===-_-__--_---==_____-
ACTION:
CONSISTANT TERMINOLOGY GUIDELINES IN AGREEMENT WITH CR3 ABBREVIATIONS LIST WILL 3E IMPLEMENTED AND PANELS RELABELED ACCORDINGLY. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-10)
- - - - - - - _ - . - _ - _ - - - _ _ - - _ _ - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _- _____ =------__
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI l
/2.9
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0036 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO. : 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.6.2.1A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS PLACEMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN
.--------------= ----.-------------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE LOCATIONS OF LABELS DO NOT ALWAYS FOLLOW A CONVENTION.
.-------- - .==--------- - ------------------------ _ -
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE OPERATORS ARE TRAINED TO READ LABEL BEFORE PLACING THEIR HAND ON A CONTROL.
= =------------------ ---__ _ ----------------------
ACTION:
ALL CONTROL BOARD LABELS HAVE BEEN REMOVED. IF SPACE IS AVAILABLE LABLES l WILL DE PLACED ABOVE THE APPROPRIATE CONTROL COMPONENT. (REF: MAR-84-OB-10-10 )
- - - - - - - - - - = = _ - . = = . - _ - - _ = - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - = = - - - - - - - ---- ---=
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/30
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0038 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.1.1 t
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS NEED FOR LADELING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MOST THROTTLE VALVES ARE LABELED WITH A RED T LABEL.
i -_-----_---_---_----- --- ----__-_-___----__----_------_---_------__----_-__
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE "T" LADEL IS AN OPERATOR AID. OPERATOR TRAINING TEACHES THE OPERATOR TO RECOGNIZE WHICH VALVES ARE THROTTLEABLE. THEREFORE, ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW. .
SAFETY CONSEQUENCES MAY EXIST, DEPENDING ON THE VALVE.
t
_----_-_--__---_--___--_----____==_ -_________- --__--_________-----
l ACTION:
i ALL THROTTLEADLE VALVES WILL BE LABELLED WITH A RED T. THIS WILL BE REFLECTED IN THE CR3 DESIGNS CONVENTIONS DOCUMENT. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-10)
==__ --------------------- _
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI h
I 31
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0041 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY
_--__---_--_--------__----__-----_= __-__---_-___-_---__--_---_____-____
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.5C
_----------===-- ---------_--------------_---------_------_-____------
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE READABILITY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
j GN DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
DYMO TAPE IS USED FOR LABELING ON SOME ANNUNCIATOR TILES. SINCE THE TAPE IS OPAGUE, IT IS DIFFICULT IN SOME PLACES TO TELL WHETHER OR NOT THE WINDOW IS ILLUMINATED.
_-----_-------------------= -__--------_-------- ----__--_____
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WINDOWS HAVE DEEN REVIEWED FOR INPUT, CONFORMANCE TO CR3 ADDREVIATIONS LIST AND PROPER DESCRIPTION. CORRECTIONS WILL BE MADE AS REQUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
_ -___==-----------_------_----------_-__-- =-------- ---_-
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI 1
/32
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD ;
1 I
HEO. NO. : 0047 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.3B
.-----------------_ ----------------------- __==-_ ----------- -
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES RB TEMP TROUBLE /RB PRESS AT 2 PSIG, NS LINE A1 HI RAD /MS LINE B2 HI RAD, RB SUMP HIGH LEVEL, RB FLOOD HI LEVEL, CRDM SHROUD FANS TRIPPED, LOAD SEQUENCE BLOCK 2, LOAD SEGUENCE BLOCK 3, LOAD SEQUENCE BLOCK
- 4. SEISMIC INST. TROUBLE, XMIT PWR SUPPLY "A" ON BACKUP, XMIT PWR SUPPLY "B" ON BACKUP, LOOSE PARTS MONITORING
= ---------- - _=-----------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE FIRST EIGHT ANNUNCIATORS LISTED ABOVE WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED IN THE C MATRIX RATHER THAN THEIR PRESENT LOCATIONS ON THE ES PANEL.
THE LAST FOUR ANNUNCIATORS ARE NOT RELATED TO ANYTHING ON THE ES PANEL.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WINDOWS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND THEN PRIORITIZED INTO 4 CATEGORIES. CATEGORY 4 WINDOWS WILL DE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATORS SYSTEM (RETAINED ON SEGUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDERS). REMAINING WINDOWS WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY GROUPED OVER THEIR APPROPRIATE CONTROLS AND BY SYSTEMS (6.3.3.3.
i D(2)) AND FUNCTIONS. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01) i CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l 3 REFUEL VI 4
I'
/33
. HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0048 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS I l
1 DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.4C
-------------------------------------------== -------------------
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------ =_ --==-- =------ __ - __-----
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES DH CCC TANK A LEVEL, HP INJ FLOW HI/ LOW, LP INJ FLOW HI/ LOW, RBS INIT INJ FLOW A HI/LO, RBS RECIRC FLOW A HI/LO, CF TANK A PRESSURE, CF TANK A LEVEL, CF TANK A DISCH VLV POS, HP INJ FLOW HIGH/ LOW, LP INJ FLOW HIGH/ LOW, CF TANK H PRESSURE, CF T/.NK B LEVEL, RBS INIT INJ FLOW B HI/LO, CF TANK B DISCH VLV POS, DH CCC TANK B LEVEL, RBS RECIRC FLOW B HI/LO, BOR WAT STOR TANK LEVEL, BOR WAT STOR TANK TEMP, SOD THIO TANK TEMP, SOD THIO TANK LEVEL, SOD HYD TANK TEMP, SOD HTD TANK LEVEL, CRD DISCH TEMP X211 TO X279, NS CCC TANK LEVEL, NS CCC TANK PRESS, ISOLATION VLV AIR FAILURE
__----------_____--_-_--__--_----- __-_------==__=__ __---_--____ ---_---
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE 26 ANNUCIATORS LISTED ABOVE ARE AMBIGUOUS OR UNSPECIFIC IN THEIR CONTENT.
__---_------------------------__--------_---------------------= ---_-----_--
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE l CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WERE REVIEWED FOR THEIR INPUTS AND WILL BE CORRECTED INTO A STANDARD THREE LINE FORMAT. THE FIRST LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PLANT SYSTEM / COMPONENT", THE SECOND LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PARAMETER", AND THIRD LINE TO CONTAIN THE " STATUS". (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
/ 3 44
HE0 #0. 'f 8 f46E 2 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI 4
6 i
O l
l i
f I3r
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0049 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.4D
= = _ _ _ -----.------------------------------------------------------------------
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS PANEL /WDRKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
- =---------------- _ ----------=_ __ __-__---- ---
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ABBREVIATIONS ARE NOT CONSISTENTLY USED IN ANNUNCIATOR TILE LEGENDS. FOR EXAMPLE: HP INJ ANO HPI, DH CC COOLING AND DH CCC, HI AND HIGH, LO AND LOW, VV AND VLV.
----------------------- = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
= _ ==------------====___-------------------- ___-----
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATOR TILES HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE TO THE CR3 ABBREVIATIONS LIST AND WILL BE CCRRECTED WHERE REQUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
_--_= _____----------_-_-_---___--_----_---------------- ___----_
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/36
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0050 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS
_-------_-_----------__----__--- - - =___--------__-------__----------_------
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.3B CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS
.-----------------------------_ -- ---------- ==------- -
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ANNUNCIATOR TILE FUNCTIONAL GROUPING COULD BE IMPROVED USING A SYSTEM ORGANIZATION. MATRIX F ANNUNCI ATORS COULD BE GROUPED: CI, CHILLED WATER, HVAC. MATRIX G ANNUNCI ATORS COULD BE GROUPED: EFW, HVAC, SC CC SYSTEM. AIR SYSTEMS (IA & SA), DW, BAST, WASTE, MISC.
.-- _-------------------------------------== ----------------------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE -
CATEGORY IS 3ASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs. '
ACTION:
ANNUNCIATORS TILES WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY GROUPED BY SYSTEM AND COMPONENT.
(REF: MAR 84-08-10-01) s
-------------------------------------------- _ - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/37 -
l HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0051 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS
.-----_--_-------------- __ =------------=______---_------------------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS RCVR A LO PR INST AIR A LO, RCVR B LO PR INST B LO, INST AIR AB LOW PR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THESE INSTRUMENT AIR ALARMS WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATELY GROUPED WITH THE IA ALARMS IN MATRIX G (THEY ARE PRESENTLY IN F).
, RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
_-- = _ _ _ _ __-----
ACTION:
THESE ALARMS WILL BE GROUPED WITH THE OTHER ASSOCIATED ALARMS IN THE O MATRIX. (REF: MAR 04-08-10-01)
-------------------------_------=_ _ _ _
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/ 3'8
l l
4 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0052 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY i
j DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1A l
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
. ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS AHU FANS HI CONDENSATE
=------------------------- _. ----------------------
_--_=_=------=__-
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THIS ANNUNCIATOR IS MORE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED ON THE ES PANEL FROM WHICH THE RELATED FANS ARE CONTROLLED.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ = _ - - = - - - - - - --------------
4 RECOMMENDATION:
INVESTIGATE FURTHER CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING l SYSTEM HEOs.
l
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - _- --__---=__ =----------_--_----__---_---_---_- -
l ACTION:
THIS ANNUNCIATORS WINDOW WILL BE RETITLED "AH FAN /A/B/C, CONDENSATE, HIGH".
IT WILL REMAIN IN THE F MATRIX DECAUSE IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RB BUILDING VENTILATION SYSTEM WHICH HAS ITS ALARMS IN THE F MATRIX. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
__=. _---------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI l3)
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0053 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
.----------------- -----_ .-- _ __=-------------------
REVIEWER: WEEKS
_ == ------ _-- -_ -------
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
=_ _--- __ ----- ---------
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1A
___== =----------------------------------------------------____ -
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS
.---------------------------------------------- - - - - - - = - - - - ------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS METEOROLOGICAL TROUBLE, DIESEL GEN IN 30 MIN RATING, DIESEL GEN AT 25 MIN RATING, FIRE SYSTEM TROUBLE
_--_-----__-------_----=---- __=--_--------_-_-== ----_-__--_-_------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THESE ALARMS ARE NOT APPROPRIATELY LOCATED.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs
-_--_-----_-------__-_--------------_--_--_--. --_---_--_-- ==- -_--
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WINDOWS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND THEN PRIORITIZED INTO 4 CATEGORIES. CATEGORY 4 WINDOWS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATORS SYSTEM (RETAIN ON SEQUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER). THE REMAINING WINDOWS WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY GROUPED OVER THEIR APPROPRIATE CONTROLS AND BY SYSTEM (6.3.3.
3.D(2)). THE METEROLOGICAL TROUBLE WINDOW WILL DE REMOVED. THE PS PANEL ON THE " PRIMARY & SECONDARY AUXILLARY" PANEL AND THEREFORE THE REMAINING WINDOWS LOGICALLY BELONG THERE. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
-----=_==_ ---------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/4 O
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0054 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUI'DELINE NO.: 6.3.3.4A
.-----.----------- _ _=--------------------------------------------------
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID. : COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
. PS SPENT FUEL POOL LEVEL, CASK AREA LEVEL, FUEL TRANSF CANAL LEVEL, FEED WTR PUMP POT LEVEL, GWP-1A, CWP-18,
! BORIC ACID STOR TANK 1A, BORIC ACID STOR TANK 18, GAMMA LO RAD / FAIL, LIQUID LO/ RAD FAIL, ATMOSPHERE LO/ RAD FAIL, ATMOSPHERE AIR FLW HI/LO, FLUSH WATER DOP 2A, FLUSH WATER DOP 28, FLUSH WATER PUMP PRESS'S, CW PPS LUBE WTR STRAINER, WASTE GAS COMPRESSORS, RC DRAIN TANK LEVEL, DH PIT SUMP PUMPS, RWP FLUSH WTR FROM SW SYS, AUX BLDG SUMP PUMPS, LAUNDRY SHOWER l
SUMP PUMPS, SECOND SAMPLE RECOVERY, SECOND SAMPLE CHILLED WATER. SECOND SAMPLE ANALYSIS, CDSTR SAMPLE EXTRACT PUMPS, NITROGEN GAS SUPPLY PRESS, RC PUMP SEAL FLOWS, RC PUMP BLEED OFFS, N2 HEATER 1 TEMP, N2 HEATER 2 TEMP, MAKEUP TANK LEVEL. MAKEUP TANK PRESS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THESE ALARMS ARE AMBIGUOUS.
___ == --------------- ------------------- ----- ---
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WERE REVIEWED FOR THEIR INPUTS AND WILL BE CORRECTED INTO A STANDARD THREE LINE FORMAT: THE FIRST LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PLANT SYSTEM COMPONENT", THE SECOND LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PARAMETER", AND THE THIRD LINE
/41
i
//E'O NQ 90 54 l HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD
$6E 2 !
TO CONTAIN THE " STATUS". (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI 14 2.
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0055 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS
.---------_ ==----------------------------------------------------------
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1A
------------------------------------===_=__ ------------------- ---
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS MOTOR EF PUMP FAIL TO START, MOTOR EF PUMP AUTO STARTED, TURB EF PUP FAIL TO START, TURB EF PUMP AUTO STARTED, MOTOR EF PUMP DISCH PRS LOW, GW CONTROL VV FULL CLOSED
=------_==___--_-_----- -_------_--_-- --
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THESE ANNUNCIATORS WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED IN MATRIX G RATHER THAN MATRIX H. ROOM COULD DE MADE FOR SOME OF THEM IF THE WASTE SYSTEM ALARMS THAT ARE IN G WERE MOVED TO H WHERE THEY WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs ACTION:
ALL ANUNCIATORS WINDOWS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND THEN PRIORITIZED INTO 4 CATEGORIES. CATEGORY 4 WINDOWS WILL DE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM (RETAINED ON SEGUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER).. REMAINING WINDOWS WILL DE FUNCTIONALLY GROUPED OVER THEIR APPROPRIATE CONTROLS AND BY SYSTEMS (6.3.3.3.
D(2)) AND FUNCTION. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/43
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0060 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATIDN i
l REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.4.5D GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
, CONTROLS ROTARY SELECTOR CONTROLS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC TURB BYPASS VALVE SELECTION i
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE SWITCH DOES NOT HAVE THE NORMAL BACKING PLATE WHICH SHOWS SWITCH POSITION. THIS MAKES IDENTIFICATION OF SWITCH POSITION DIFFICULT.
_-______-__-__--_-__-._________-_-________ ==_____-_________--_-____________
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE OPERATORS ARE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THE SWITCH, THEREFORE, ERROR PROBABILITY l IS LOW. POTENTIAL FOR UNMONITORED RELEASE OF SECONDARY STEAM TO THE ATMOSPHERE EXISTS IF THE TURBINE BYPASS VALVES WERE CONTROLLING STEAM PRESSURE.
) ACTION:
l ACTION TO DE TAKEN THE SELECTOR SWITCH HAS DEEN REMOVED AS PART OF THE REMOTE SHUTDOWN MODIFICATION. (REF: MAR 77-07-01-11)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 COMPLETE (REFUEL V) 1
]44
. , , . _ _ . , . _ _ - . . . ___,_ _. _ , ___ . . _ . . . _ _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ ~ _..
HUMAN ENGIfEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l
HEO. NO. : 0066 PLANT: CR3
! DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
, DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.4D CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS PRINTING ON THE DISPLAY FACE PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
_ --=-- -=____ ------------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ABBREVIATIONS ARE NOT USED CONSISTENTLY. EXAMPLES AVE / AVG,PZR/ PRESS /PRZR, PRESS /PR,INTERM/ INT GRP/G.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ALL TERMINOLOGY IS UNDERSTANDABLE EVEN THOUGH IT MAY NOT BE CONSISTENT. THIS
. COUPLED WITH OPERATOR TRAINING RESULTS IN LOW ERROR POTENTIAL. CONSEQUENCES COULD DE SERIOUS BASED ON CUMULATIVE EFFECTS WITH OTHER HEOS.
1
---------------== --- --------- ----
ACTION:
ALL NAMEPLATES AND LABELS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR CONFORMANCE WITH CR3 ABBREVIATIONS LIST AND WILL BE CORRECTED AS REQUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-04
& MAR 84-08-10-10)
--------------.--------= == ------------===___ _-----------------------
l 4
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
- 3 REFUEL VI l
I l
l (4C I
l E. ._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ . _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ - . . _ _ . . . _ _ _ . _ . _ . .-. _.-. _ _._ _ _ _ .
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l HEO. NO. : 0076 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
- - - - - - - - - - - - = = _=---------------------------------------- ------ --_-
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. 8. 1. 1 i
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
, PANEL LAYOUT ASSIGNING PANEL CONTENTS 1
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE RCP AC OIL PUMPS (3A1,3A2, 3B1,382) ARE PLACED IN A BACKWARDS ORDER FROM i THE ARRANGEMENT OF ASSOCIATED SWITCHES. GROUPING OF METERS / RECORDERS AND ASSOCIATED SWITCHES CONFORM TO NO SET PATTERN.
4 RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE RCP AC OIL PUMP SWITCHES WILL BE RE-ARRANGED TO CONFORM TO THE ARRANGEMENT OF THIS ASSOCIATED RC PUMPS. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-04)
_------ ==-----------------------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
i /4G
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0083 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.9.1.1C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL-DISPLAY INTEGRATION >^ SINGLE CONTROL AND DISPLAY PAIRS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC FW-205-PI, FW-206-PI (FW PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE)
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE LADELS ARE LOCATED TO THE RIGHT OF THE INDICATORS AND COULD DE OVERLOOKED.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
LABELS WILL DE RELOCATED ABOVE INDICATORS. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-04)
_------------------ --------------- =- ------ -------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0114 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.3A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
, VISUAL DISPLAYS LEGEND LIGHT INDICATORS 5 PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ED DECCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MANY LEGENDS ARE NOT LEGIBLE DUE TO WORN OFF MARKINGS.
I RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE OPERATORS ARE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THESE CONTROLS, THEREFORE, ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW. THERE ARE POSSIBLE SAFETY CONSEGUENCES, HOWEVER, THE INFORMATION IS AVAILA3LE ELSEWHERE.
t ACTION:
, ALL THE MONITORING LIGHT LEGENDS ARE TO BE REPLACED (REF: MAR 84-08-10-02 &
MAR 84-08-10-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
/48
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD
- HEO. NO.
- 0123 i PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 4
TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS 1
- DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
! DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.2.2 i CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS CODING OF CONTROLS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
l TO BRG.VIB PICKUP SELECTION 4 .
1 -----_--------------_---_-------------_-_--_-------_--------_---------_-----_--
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE SWITCHES INDICATE POSITION CHANGES BUT THERE IS NO POSITION INDICATOR.
RECOMMENDATION:
l' CHANGE OPERATOR TRAINING ENABLES HIM TO RECOGNIZE THE DESIRED POSITION. THE INFORMATION IS TREND INFORMATION. NO CONTROL ACTIONS ARE INITIATED BY SELECTING THE WRONG POINT.
ACTION:
THE BEARING VIBRATION PICKUP RECORDERS AND ASSOCIATED SELECTION SWITCHES '
WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE PANEL. THIS PARAMETER WILL BE IMPUTTED TO A NEW j MULTIPOINT RECORDER LOCATED ON THE REAR OF THE PANEL. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 4 REFUEL VI i
i l
I l,
i 1
l49 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0150 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.2B
______.--_-___-_-_-____-_____-_ -_______--__-_____..___-_-______--___- _= _ _ _ -
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS USA 3ILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS DEMIN WATER STOR WT-32-LI, MISC WATER STOR WD-49-LI, RC BLEED TANK WD-54-LI 58-LI 62-LI, FOXBORO BATCH FLOW CONTROLLER, SPENT FUEL LEVEL SF-1-LI1 LI2, WD-23-LI2 (RC DRAIN TANK LEVEL)
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE SCALES USED REQUIRE CONVERSIONS THAT ARE NOT EASILY PERFORMED.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE OPERATOR IS ONLY INTERESTED IN A RELATIVE INDICATION OF TANK LEVEL FOR THE MAJORITY OF THESE INDICATORS. PER GUIDELINE 6.5.1.2C PERCENT IS AN APPROPRIATE SCALE IN THESE CASES. WHERE A PROCEDURAL DATA ENTRY REGUIRES A CONVERSION FACTOR TO DE USED, THAT CONVERSION FACTOR WILL DE SPECIFIED IN THE PROCEDURE. GR N TRANSPARENT TAPE WILL DE USED TO MARK THE LIMITS OF NORMAL LEVEL ON T E INDICATORS WHERE APPROPRIATE. THE RANGE OF WT-32-LI2 IS O-100%s % WILL DE DDED TO THE LADEL. UNITS WILL DE ADDED TO THE LABELS FOR SF-1-LII, SF-1-LI2 AND WD-23-LI2. WD-49-LI HAS HAD % ADDED TO THE LABEL.
LADELS WILL DE ADDED FOR WD-54-LI, WD-5S-LI AND WD-62-LI. THE FOXBORO BATCH CONTROLLER REGUIRES PERIODIC FLOW LOOP CALIDRATION FOR BATCH CONTROL. THIS CALIDRATION CHANGES THE SETTING ON THE CONTROLLER SUCH THAT PERMANENT LABELING IS IMPRACTICAL. CONVERSION INFORMATION WILL BE PROVIDED BY TEMPORARY LABELS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CR-3 PLANT PROCEDURES. WD-23-LI2 WILL HAVE THE CONVERSION FACTOR SPECIFIED BY MEANS OF A TEMPORARY TAG SINCE IT IS SU3 JECT TO FREQUENT REVISION AS DORON CONCENTRATION IN THE PRIMARY SYSTEM
/To
HE0 N0l 0130 HUMAN ENGINEERING 08SERVATION RECORD 4GE 2 CHANGES.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-10) l i
l i
l l
l w
h i
l k l
i I
i l
i r
I h
t I
l
/T) ,
)
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD )
l l
1 HEO.NO.: 0156 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY 3
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.6C EUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS COLOR CODING
, PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PD MSIV TEST LIGHTS, FW TEST LIGHTS, MS LINE RUPTURE ACTUATION, MSIV TEST NORMAL RESET SWITCHES DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE COLOR CODES USED ARE NOT CONSISTENT. YELLOW, BLUE, AND RED ARE USED IN '
VARIOUS UNASSOCIATED SITUATIONS.
RECOMMENDATION:
l INVESTIGATE FURTHER ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW BECAUSE OF OPERATOR TRAINING AND PROPER LABELING.
CONSEQUENCES COULD DE SERIOUS BASED ON OPERATOR STRESS RESULTING FROM CUMULATIVE EFFECTS.
ACTION:
INSTALLATON OF THE EFIC MODIFICATION REMOVED THE LIGHTS WHICH HAD INCONSISTENT COLOR CODES. THE COLOR CODING FOR PANEL STATUS LIGHTS WILL BE SPECIFIED BY THE CR-3 DESIGN CONVENTIONS DOCUMENT AS FOLLOWS: A) BLUE -
BISTABLE TRIPPED, MANUAL ACTUATION, OR ES EQUIPMENT ACTUATED STATUS B) AMBER
- CHANNEL DYPASSED OR ES EQUIPMENT NOT ACTUATED (REF: MAR 80-10-66)
, CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: ,
3 COMPLETE (REFUEL V) 4 R
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0164 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION 1
REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY i
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.1A j CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS l
f PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
, IC TURB THROTTLE PRESSURE, ATMOS DUMP VALVES OPEN, TOXIC GAS DETECTED /TRBL, BYPASS VALVES AIR SUPPLY FAIL DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THESE ALARMS WOULD DE MORE APPROPRIATELY GROUPED ON OTHER PANELS. EXAMPLES ARE TURB THROTTLE PRESSURE ON TGF PANEEL DR MATRIX L, ATMOS DUMP VALVES OPEN 4 ON MATRIX L, TOXIC GAS DETECTED /TRDL ON PSA,AND BYPASS VALVES AIR SUPPLY FAIL ON MATRIX L.
RECOMMENDATION:
i CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING
, CYSTEM HEOs.
I ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATOR WINDOWS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND THE PRIORITIZED INTO 4 CATAGORIES. CATAGORY 4 WINDOW WILL DE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM (RETAINED ON SEGUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER). REMAINING WINDOW WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY GROUPED OVER THIS APPROPRIATE CONTROL AND BY SYSTEM (6.3.3.3.
D(2)) AND FUNCTION (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01) 1 --__-----___________-_____--____-______________-_______-------_____----___--___
l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l 3 REFUEL VI l
l l /T3 i
- - - , , _ . . , , - . , - _ - _ _ _ , _ . _ _ . , _ _ _ , . , _ _ _ - . , n--- . _ ,_,,.,,_,-. , _ ,. , , _ _ , , - - , . - - - ,
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0165 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/I6/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION i
REVIEWER: WEEKS i
, DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
! DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.38 l GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
} ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES i
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC GROUP PORV/ SAFETY VALVE ALARMS l DESCRIP TION OF DISCREPANCY:
I SEVERAL ALARMS ARE NOT GROUPED TOGETHER. IN GENERAL, GROUPING IN THE PANEL l
BY SYSTEM AND FOR CONSISTENCY COULD BE IMPROVED.
i _______________________________________________________________________- -____
i RECOMMENDATION:
i CHANGE CATEGORY IS DASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING
! SYSTEM HEDs.
l 1
i i
J ACTION:
l l THE PORV/ SAFETY VALVE ALARMS WILL BE GROUPED BY SYSTEM AND PRIORITY (REF:
MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 3 REFUEL VI -
1 i
I I
/ 54
,wn -
-- --. -mmen ..-m .. . ... - w-
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0166 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS
! DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.4A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS
- PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.
- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC -
PRESSURIZER LEVEL, RC PRESS HTR GROUP (5 ALARMS),
i STEAM GEN 1A LEVEL. STEAM GEN-1B LEVEL, FWPT LUBE OIL TANK LEVEL
= -- _ ----------------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE ALARM DESCRIPTIONS ARE AMBIGUOUS.
- --______-________---__---_-------_------_-_______-_-_-= ___-_____--___-____-_
- RECOMMENDATION
1 CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF.OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs ACTION:
l ALL ANNUNCIATORS HAVE DEEN REVIEWED FOR THEIR INPUTS AND WILL DE CORRECTED INTO A STANDARD THREE LINES OF ENGRAVING USING THE FOLLOWING FORMAT: THE FIRST LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PLANT SYSTEM / COMPONENT", THE SECOND LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PARAMETER", AND THE THIRD LINE TO CONTAIN THE " STATUS". (REF:
MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI ITT
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0167 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATIDN l REVIEWER: WEEMS i
1 l
- DATA SOURCE
- CONTROL ROOM SURVEY l
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1A 4
4 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
1 ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS l ,
i PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
I s
IC .
l DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
i THE RCP RELATED ALARMS SHOULD DE MOVED TO MATRIX I WITH OTHER ASSOCIATED I ALARMS.
i k
j _________________________________= _______________-____________-__-----------
! RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING
! OYSTEM HEOs.
! ACTION:
1 ALL ANNUNCIATORS WINDOWS WERE REVIEWED FAR INPUT AND WILL BE GROUPED BY SYSTEM, FUNCTION, AND PRIORITY (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/EL i
- - - - - -_ - - . _ , ; w_ _,.w . +,-_m.., , _
I HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0168 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY t
1 DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1A i
i CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS l ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS
\ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
l PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC MS ISOL VVS AIR FAIL, TURBINE EHC ON MANUAL, STM LINE RUPT ACT-1 ACT-2
! DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
l SOME ALARMS COULD BE MORE EFFECTIVELY GROUPED IN OTHER MATRICES. FOR EXAMPLE, TURBINE EHC ON MANUAL ON TGF, STM LINE RUPT ACT-1 AND 2 DN PSA PANEL, AND M3 ISOL VVS AIR FAIL ON PANEL TGF.
, l j __------_-----_-_--_-----------_---_---__--__-_--_----------__----___----------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WINDOWS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND THEN PRIORITIZED '
INTO 4 CATAGORIES. CATORGORY 4 WINDOWS WILL DE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM (RETAINED ON SEQUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER). REMAINING WINDOWS WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY GROUPED OVER THIS APPROPRIATE CONTROL AND BY SYSTEM (6.3.3.3.
D(2) AND FUNCTION (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
i 3 REFUEL VI I
i I
I I 1 l
/T7
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0169 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO. : 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO CW ALARMS, GLAND STEAM ALARMS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SEVERAL ALARMS ARE DISTRIBUTED BETWEEN SEVERAL PANELS. A MORE EFFICIENT
, GROUPING OF THESE SYSTEMS ON THESE TWO PANELS COULD BE PROVIDED.
A i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
ACTION:
! ALL CW ALARMS WILL DE GROUPED ON THE TG PANEL IN ANNUNCIATOR MATRIX "M" AND
! GLAND STEAM ALARMS IN MATRIX "O" (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI r
I 1
1 1
i 1
/ J7P
. _ - - _ _ _ _ . ~ _ . _ _ _ - _ _ .. _ . . _ , ., -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0170 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKKS, WEEKS 1
, DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.4A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS i
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
. TO CDSTE STOR TANK LEVEL, CDSTR HOT WELL LEVEL, GLAND STEAM PRESS HI/LO, DEAERATOR HI LEVEL CONTROL VALVE, EH FLUID SUPP PRESS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SEVERAL ANNUNCIATORS HAVE AMBIGUOUS LADELS.
- RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUNULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND WILL BE CORRECTED INTO A STANDARD THREE LINE FORMAT THE FIRST LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PLANT SYSTEM / COMPONENT", THE SECOND LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PARAMETER", AND THE THIRD LINE TO CONTAIN THE " STATUS". (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01) i -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/d
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0171 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SS DIESEL GENERATOR ALARMS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE DIESEL GENERATOR RELATED ALARMS WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATELY LOCATED CENTRAL TO BOTH DIESEL GENERATOR CONTROLS ON MATRIX R.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ON OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
ACTION:
THERE ARE THREE ANNUNCIATORS MATRICIES LOCATED OVER THE LEFT AND CENTRAL PARTRONS OF THE SS PANEL. THE CONTROLS FOR DIESEL GENERATORS B ARE LOCATED
,l TO THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE PANEL WITH NO MATRIX ADOVE IT. THE DIESEL GENERATOR ALAHMS WILL BE REGROUPED INTO THE CENTER NATRIX (G) WITH THE A GENERATORS ALARMS TO THE LEFT. B GENERATOR ALARMS TO THE RIGHT, AND COMMON ALARMS IN THE CENTER. THIS REFLECTS THE LAYOUT OF THE CONTROLS ON THE PANEL. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/60
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0176 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 01/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: HISTORICAL DOCUMENT REVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: LER 77-41 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.1.2 LER 77-99 LER 77-127 LER 77-147 LER 79-090 LER 80-007 LER 82-056 LER 82-061 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ALARM PARAMETER SELECTION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CONTAINMENT AIR TEMPERATURE DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE RB AIR TEMPERATURE ROSE DUE TO LOSS OF COOLING. EVENT WAS DISCOVERED DURING ROUTINE SURVEILLANCE.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE l ACTION:
i
- AN ALARM POINT FOR RB TEMPERATURE WAS ADDED. NO LERs HAVE BEEN WRITTEN SINCE 1922. ADDITIALLY A RB TEMPERATURE RECORDER WILL DE ADDED TO MONITOR FOUR
- REACTOR BUILDING TEMPERATURES AND A PATCH BOARD WILL DE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO THE RECORDER TO PROVIDE MONITORING CAPADILITY OF THE REMAINING REACTOR DUILDING TEMPERATURE SENSORS. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
1 REFUEL VI
/6/
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD f HEO.NO.- 0178
! PLANT: CR3 DATE: 01/16/84 l TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
.----------------------------------------..--------------- ___==--------
CEVIEWER: WEEKS i DATA SOURCE: HISTORICAL DOCUMENT REVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: UDER 81-03 0700 GUIDELINE NO.- 6.7.3.2B UDER 81-11 UDER 81-12 UDER 81-13 UOER 81-17 UOER 82-01 UDER 82-09 UDER 82-12 UOER 82-14 UDER 82-15 UDER 82-16 UDER 82-17 UOER 82-18 UDER 82-19 UOER 82-20 UDER 82-22 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PROCESS COMPUTERS ALARM MESSAGES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
DUE TO A TRANSIENT THE EVENTS RECORDER OVERLOADED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT STORAGE CAPACITY.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
A NEW SER WITH INCREASED STORAGE CAPACITY WAS INSTALLED DURING REFUEL V. IT WILL BE MODIFIED TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL 30% STORAGE CAPACITY PLUG
/62
WLELY NWUW HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD 8465 2 INCREA!ED DICPLAY CAPABILITY (REF: MAR C3 11 OB)
_______________________________________________________________________=_-----___
'. CATECORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
1 I REFUEL VI l
1 l
4
[
t i
i I
r I
i 1
6 l
/62 i o
- v t
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD 1 l
l HEO.NO.: 0181 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
_.-----__-----_-------_------ ---------------------------==- - ---
REVIEWER: GADDY
__=-----------
DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: O 01 0700 GUIDELINE NO.. 6.5.I.IB CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DEZCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
BAILEY RECORDERS MAKE IT HARD TO SEE INSTANTANEOUS TRANSIENT CHANGES.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE a
ACTION:
EXISTING RECORDERS WILL BE REPLACED BY NEW INDICATING RECORDERS WHICH ALLOW INSTONTANEOUS CHANGES TO BE SEEN. (REF: MAR 84-08-10) i
- CATEGORY
- IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
i l
l
/ G 4' i
n
-~-- . , - . , , , - - - _ , , . , _ - - . - - - - - -,,,,,.,,,-------,----_--,-,,-.,_--,--,--e ,,,,e---, , , - . - , -
HUMAN EN0lNEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0188 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION ,
l I
REVIEWER: GADDY
________________-____________________--___ -_'=--________________-
DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW s l -____-_____________________________-____________-___-_____________-____________
l DOCUMENT NO.: Q 03 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.1.5.3A 6.1.5.3A F 4 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE ILLUMINATION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LIGHTING BEHIND THE MAIN CONTROL BOARDS IS INADEGUATE.
RECOMMENDATION: ,
NO CHANGE THE ORIGINAL LIGHTING SURVEY WAS DONE WHILE WORK WAS BEING PERFORMED IN THE CONTROL ROOM. THE LIGHTING AND DIFFUSER DID NOT REPRESENT NORMAL CONDITIONS.
ALL LIGHTING WAS RESTORED TO NORMAL AND A NEW SURVEY PERFORMED. THERE WERE NO ILLUMINATION LEVELS BELOW THE IES RECOMMENDED MINIMUM OF THIRTY FOOTCANDLES (REFERENCES IES LIGHTING HANDBOOK, 1981, REFERENCE VOLUME, ILLUMINANCE SECTION). THERE WERE SOME RATHER HIGH READINGS, BUT THE'Y WERE NOT IN AREAS WHERE HIGH ILLUMINATION LEVELS WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO READ INDICATING LIGHTS ON THE CONTROL" BOARD. THE HIGH READINGS WERE MEASURED IN
! WORK AREAS WHERE ILLUMINATION OF DVER ONE HUNDRED FOOTCANDLES IS DESIRABLE.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED
- CATECORY: IMPLE.'ENTATION SCHEDULE:
I 3 l
)
/ST I
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATIDN RECORD I
HEO.NO.: 0189 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/2S/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: G 04 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. I . 5. 4 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE EMERGENCY LIGHTING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CN -
DECCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
EMERGENCY LIGHTING IS INADEGUATE.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF THIS HED WITH OTHER HEOS.
ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW, HOWEVER, SAFETY CONSEGUENCES RESULTING FROM INCREASED STRESS COULD BE SERIOUS.
ACTION:
EXIDE B-2OO SELF-CONTAINED EMERGENCY LIGHTING UNITS WERE INSTALLED TO BRING CONTROL ROOM EMERGENCY LIGHTS UP TO CURRENT STANDARDS.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 INSTALLED
/L6
, - - , - , - - , - -- - . - , .y. --- --------y a p
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0190 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: O 05 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.I.5.1 6.1.5.2 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE TEMPERATURE AND HUMIDITY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
VENTILATION IN THE CONTROL ROOM IS POOR IN TERMS OF AIR FLOW AND MIXING OF HOT AND COLD AIR.
RECOMMENDATION: /
NO CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF THIS HEO WITH OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL HEOS. ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW, HOWEVER, SAFETY CONSEQUENCES RESULTING FROM INCREASED STRESS COULD BE SERIOUS.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED ORIGINAL VENTILATION SURVEY WAS DONE WHILE WORK WAS BEING PERFORMED IN THE CONTROL ROOM. INADEQUATE MIXING OF HOT AND COLD AIR WAS THE RESULT OF MANY CIELING TILES. WHICH ARE USED TO DISTRIBUTE THE AIR, BEING REMOVED, AFTER WORK WAS COMPLETED AND THE TILES REPLACED A NEW VENTILATION SURVEY WAS COMPLETED AND FOUND TO DE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED IN NUREG 0700.
_----------__----_---_-------------__-_-----_ - =------------ -__--------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3
- HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0199 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW
_------------------- ==---------------------_------------
I DOCUMENT NO.: G 09 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.3.1A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA: ,
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS AND PROBLEMS OF LIGHT INDICATORS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THAT THE WIRING IS TOO HEAVY FOR THE GE CR 104 SELECTOR SWITCHES PUSH-IN TERMINAL CONNECTORS, LEADING TO THE WIRES BEING PULLED AWAY DUE TO THE WEIGHT OF THE WIRING THEREBY CAUSING SHORTS OR OPEN
- CIRCUITS TO OCCUR.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE SAFETY CONSEQUENCES AND ERROR POTENTIAL EXIST BECAUSE THE OPERATOR MAY BE UNABLE TO INITIATE AN ACTION.
l ACTION:
THE GE CR104 SELECTOR SWITCHES ASSOCIATED WITH MUV-257(PY4), MUV-53F(PH4),
! MUV-3(PR4) AND MUV-62(PM4) WERE REVIEWED TO DETERMINE CAUSE OF INTERMITTENT LOSS OF INDICATOR LIGHT. REVIEW UNCOVERED NO UNUSUAL PROBLEM. HOWEVER, ADDITION CABLE SUPPORTS FOR THE WIRE NEAR THE SELECTOR SWITCHES WILL BE PROVIDED AND THE SWITCHES CHECKED FOR PROPER MOUNTING IN THE PANEL. (REF:
MAR 84-08-10-02)
=-------- - ==--- =-----------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI l
/U
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0201 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: G 12 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.1.1A J
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS GENERAL PRINCIPLES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
EDG PRELUBE PUMP, EF BYPASS VALVES DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THAT THESE CONTROLS WERE POORLY DESIGNED FOR OPERATION.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE FOR THE EDG PRELUBE PUMPS. EDG PRELUBE PUMP CONTROLS ARE CLEARLY LABELLED AND THERE ARE RELATIVELY FEW CONTROL SWITCHES IN THE VICINITY. EDG PRELUBE IS NOT REGUIRED FOR AUTO START OF EDO.
ACTION:
ACTION TAKEN PROBLEM ON EF BYPASS VALVES (FWV-161&162) WAS THAT SWITCHES WERE IN REVERSED ORDER AND DUE TO SPACING, COULD NOT DE OPERATED TOGETHER. EFIC MODIFICATIONS REMOVED THE NEED FOR THESE VALVES AND ELIMINATED THE CONTROL SWITCHES.
---_----------------_---__- =---- ===_ -_----_- =-- --_-_---_----------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL V (MAR 80-10-66) -
/G 9
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0209 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW
=----------- _ -----
DOCUMENT NO.: O 20 0700 CUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.18 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED
==- ----------------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG DECCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED A NEED FOR AN INDICATION OF WIDE RANCE HOTWELL LEVEL.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE POTENTIAL FOR MISREADING IS HIGH, HOWEVER, MISREADING HOTWELL WILL NOT LEAD TO SERIOUS SAFETY CONSEGUENCES.
ACTION:
EFIC MODIFICATION INCLUDED THIS WIDE RANGE LEVEL INDICATION FOR HOTWELL A&B ON THE PSA PANEL
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 COMPLETE (MAR 80-10-66)
/70
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0210 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: G 21 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.1.4B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS PRIORITIZATION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ANNUNCIATOR TILES ARE NOT COLOR CODED FOR CRITICALITY.
RECOMMENDATION:
. CHANGE I
' ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATOR POINTS HAVE BEEN PRIORITIZED INTO 4 CATAGORIES. THE MOST i IMPORTANT ALARMS (PRIORITY 1) WILL BE COLOR CODED BY USING A RED BOOT OVER THE BULBS SUCH THAT WHEN AN ALARM CONDITION EXISTS, THE WINDOW FLASHED IN RED. (MAR 84-08-10-01) i CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
l I
/7/
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0213 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: O 23 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.4A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG GLAND STEAM DRAIN TANK HIGH, TURBINE TRIPPED, TURBINE TRIP
_____-__-_--_-______-----_----____-- =-_-_-_____--- _______-----__----_-__-
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS IDENTIFIED THE ABOVE ANNUNCIATORS AS ONES THAT WERE DIFFICULT TO INTERPRETE.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS 3ASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
-_---__--_-_---__------___-_-_-__-_-== __ ---- ---_----_-_-_-__-_____ ____
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATOR POINTS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND WILL BE CORRECTED INTO A STANDARD THREE LINE FORMAT: THE FIRST LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PLANT SYSTEM / COMPONENT", THE SECOND LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PARAMETER", AND THE THIRD LINE TO CONTAIN THE (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01) l -- _ _ _ _ _ _--_----_ __ _ ___ _" S T_-_-___==_ ___- A T US " . __ _ ______ ---_--_____------__
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI
/7L
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0214 i
PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO. : O 23 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.4A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC SHUT-OFF VV LOOP A OPEN, SHUT-OFF VV LOOP B OPEN, ISOL VV LOOP A CLOSED, ISOL VALVE LOOP B CLOSED DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
l OPERATORS IDENTIFIED THE ABOVE ANNUNCIATORS AS ONES WHICH WERE DIFFICULT TO INTERPRETE.
____-._------_-_-___----___---____-___--== _-- __--_---___ .-_-___
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
_-____--__----___-____----= _------__---__ _ ---__----__-_--_--____---
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATOR POINTS WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND WILL BE CORRECTED
- INTO A STANDARD THREE LINE FORMAT: THE FIRST LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PLANT I SYSTEM / COMPONENT", THE SECOND LINE TO CONTAIN THE " PARAMETER", AND THE THIRD LINE TO CONTAIN THE " STATUS" (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI I
l l
l73 l
. , ,g__7_y,m . , , , , , . . _ ,
_,,y _ _ ,
l HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD 1 1
1 HEO. NO. : 0216 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: O 23 0700 QUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.4A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS GLAND SEAL PRESSURE LOW, HI DIFF PRESS ACROSS FILTERS
== --------------------------------- -
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THAT THE ABOVE ANNUNCIATORS ARE INCORRECT. IN THE FIRST, SEAL SHOULD DE WATER. IN THE SECOND, ACROSS SHOULD BE AUX BLDG.
A RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
_---_------------_---_----_ _= = = - - - - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - - - - _ - - - - - . . _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - - - - _ -
ACTION:
THE FIRST WILL DE CHANGED TO READ " GLAND WATER - PRESS - LOW, " THE SECOND WILL BE CHANGED TO READ "AHFL 2A/B/C/D - D/P-HIGH. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
=== --------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
) ] 9L
. . -. - = - -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0218 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: G 24 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.1.2A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ALARM PARAMETER SELECTION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC RCS PRESS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THAT RCS PRESSURE ALARMS TOO LATE DURING TRANSIENT TO ALLOW OPERATOR ACTION, RESULTING IN UNNECESSARY SAFETY SYSTEM CHALLENGES.
RECOMMENDATION:
THERE IS DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF UNNECESSARY REACTOR TRIPS, THEREFORE, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT HI-PRESSURE TRIP BE RAISED AND PORV SET POINT BE LOWERED TO ORIGINAL DESIGN VALUES.
---_---------_-_--------==----
, ACTION:
THE RC HI-PRESSURE TRIP SETPOINT LIMIT WILL BE RAISED TO THE ORIGINAL DESIGN VALUE WITH APPROPRIATE ALLOWANCE FOR INSTRUMENT STRING ERROR. THE PORV SETPOINT WILL NOT BE CHANGED IN ACCORDANCE WITH B&W OWNERS GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS. (REF: MAR 86-04-21-01) .
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
1 REFUEL VI OR BEFORE (SUBJECT TO NRC APJ MMOVAL}f 7schkl Speahak Rewn
/7J'
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0219 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.- 0 25 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.1.2
._____==----------------------------------------------- ---------
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ALARM PARAMETER EELECTION PANEL / WORKSTATION ID. : COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS . SECONDARY SAMPLE ANALYSIS ALARMS, WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM, WASTE GAS COMPRESSOR TROUBLE, CONDENSOR EXTRACT PUMP TRIP, MISC COOLING FANS TRIP FOR AHF-34, LOW RADIATION FAILURE ALARMS, SCREEN WASH, SAMPLE CHILLED WATER HEATER DRAINS, SUMP PUMPS
= =------------------- -----------------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THE ABOVE NUISANCE ALARMS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS 3ASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF THIS HEO WITH OTHER HEOS.
ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW, HOWEVER, SAFETY CONSEQUENCES RESULTING FROM INCREASED STRESS COULD BE SERIOUS.
_-------- _- -=- ---------------------_-- --------
ACTION:
THE SECONDARY SAMPLE ANALYSIS ALARMS AND WASTE DISPOSAL SYSTEM ALARMS WILL DE MOVED TO LOCAL SATELLITE ANNUNCIATOR PANELS. THE SATELLITE PANELS WILL i INCORPORATE A LINE DELAY TO ALLOW THE LOCAL OPERATOR TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE l ALARM BEFORE IT REFLASHES TO THE CONTROL ROOM. THE OTHER ALARMS REFERENCED ABOVE WERE REVIEWED AND PRIORITIZED INTO 4 PRIORITIES. ALARMS WHICH DO NOT REQUIRE IMMEDIATE OPERATORS ATTENTION ARE PRIORITY 4 AND WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATORS ALTHOUGH THEY STILL ARE ANNOUNCED ON THE SEGUENCE - OF
- EVENTS RECORDER. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
.-------------------=__ - - - ----------------------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i, / 76
, . - ,- _m., _ - _ _ _ - - . - . . - , . _ . _ . . . . - _ _ . . . _ - _ . _ _ _ . -
~^-
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD 1
l HEO. NO. : 0220 l PLANT: CR3 i DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: QUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW
=-------- ------------- _ -----------------------
DOCUMENT NO.: O 26 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.2.1.1 6.2.1.2C GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
COMMUNICATIONS REGUIREMENTS FOR VOICE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS SUGGESTED THE FOLLOWING IMPROVEMENTS TO THE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM:
ADD A DEDICATED RADIO CHANNEL (FCC DEPENDENT) FOR THE CONTROL ROOM, IMPROVE THE IN-PLANT COMMUNICATION 3Y ELIMINATING THE DEAD SPOTS (I.E., OPS BLDG), AND MOVE THE RED PHONE AND BEEPER PAGE.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
A THIRD CHANNEL HAS DEEN ADDED TO RADIO. THE DEAD SPOTS REFERED TO ARE IN THE PLANT, NOT IN THE CONTROL ROOM. THE RED PHONE WILL BE MOVED FROM ITS PRESENT LOCATION TO A LOCATION IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA BUT WHERE IT WILL NOT RESTRICT OPERATOR MOVEMENT. THE BEEPER PAGE (OLD MOTOROLA UNIT) WILL BE REMOVED. THE PLANT CURRENTLY USES A DEEPER PAGE SYSTEM THROUGH THE LOCAL
! TELEPHONE COMPANY.
1 ---_--_-----_--_--_--_- -_=-- -- - -_-_-----_----- -- - ------------_---_-----
l CATECORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/77
~. __
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0234 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
l REVIEWER: GADDY !
DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: I3 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.1.3 l CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS FIRST GUT ANNUNCIATORS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
==---__---_----_-_---- --___
l DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THERE IS NO CAPABILITY FOR DETERMININC FIRST-OUT ANNUNCIATORS OR ORDERING OF ALARMS AS THEY COME IN.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW BECAUSE OPERATOR ACTIONS DO NOT RELY SOLEY ON THE ANNUNCIATORS. HIGH STRESS CAUSED BY THE LACK OF ABILITY TO DETERMINE FIRST-OUT ANNUNCIATORS OR ORDERING OF ALARMS CAN HAVE SERIOUS SAFETY CONSEGUENCES.
, ----- ---------------------------------= ._ - - - - = --------------- -- --
ACTION:
A NEW SEGUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER HAS BEEN INSTALLED WHICH WILL PROVIDE THIS FUNCTION.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 COMPLETE (REFUEL V-MAR 83-1.1-08) l7f
- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- _--u ma - m-,,...,,, ,w - ., , , , ww-
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0245 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION 1 1
REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: UOER 82-15 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.1.2F
=-_ __=---------------------------- ----
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS PREVENTION OF ACCIDENTAL ACTIVATION
=_______---- __-----------------------== ------------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS MSIV CONTROLS
_ ___--=- ------ __
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MSIV CONTROLS DO NOT HAVE LOCKS TO PREVENT THEM FROM PASSING THROUGH A POSITION. THIS HAS CAUSED A PROBLEM IN THE PAST.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THE KNOB WAS CHANGED IN SHAPE FOR EASIER RECOGNITION. THIS ACTION AND OPERATOR TRAINING HAS REDUCED THE POTENTIAL FOR ERROR. HOWEVER.
UNINTERRUPTED MOVEMENT OF THE SWITCH THROUGH TWO POSITIONS CAN STILL CAUSE A REACTOR TRIP.
---= -- =-------------------- _------------------------------- _------
ACTION:
THIS PROBLEM WAS INVESTIGATED AND COULD NOT DE SUBSTANTIATED. IT WAS DISCUSSED WITH THE OPERATORS AND THE SWITCH MANUFACTURER AND NEITHER WERE AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM.
_--------------_---_--== --- _==-_---_-__------- --- - --
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
1
/77
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0253 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.5.4.1K
_--_--__-----_--------_----_-----_-----= -__-____ -__-----_-___ --__---
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS
_-___--__-__---__--_-__--_------_-_---___-----_-__---------_---_-__-= --_---_
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN GRAPHIC RECORDERS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SCALE MARKINGS ARE TOO WIDELY SEPARATED ON RECORDING PAPER AND ARE NOT ALWAYS VISIBLE THROUGH WINDOW.
---__--_-_----_--_--__-=___=--- -_--__-----__--_-_---___-________-__------_-___
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - =__________--_------- -_--_-- _---_------_--__--____- -_---
ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS WITH PROPER
~ SCALES (REF: MAR 84-08-10)
_-__-_--------_-_-_-_-==== _=-----_-- -_-__-_----- -___------_.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/ cPO
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0275 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.3A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS READABILITY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES REDUNDANT ES METERS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
GRADUATIONS ON REDUNDANT ES INSTRUMENTS ARE TOO SMALL TO READ.
==----------------------== -- --
______=------ - ---- __-
RECOMMENDATION:
INVESTICATE FURTHER OPERATOR TRAINING RESULTS IN LOW ERROR PROBABILITY, HOWEVER, IF AN ERROR
- WERE TO OCCUR THERE COULD DE SAFETY CONSEQUENCES DURING LOSS OF ICS/NNI POWER.
_--------------_-------_---_--------------_---- --------------- - - = = -
ACTION:
NEW SCALES WITH NEW GRADUATIONS WILL BE ADDED (REF: MAR 84-08-10-02)
--------------------------------------------------- - -== __ -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
(
l I
/ //
-_-_y.
-- -- 'v---w, ym.4 ----- , - , _--
w.- - - - --_ , . .. _. -,. - _ . , , , _ , , , _ - -
-g-,,y,- _,,y7, _ , . - _ _ , , , _ _ , . _ - , , . , , - . _
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l i
HEO.NO.: 0289 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.1.3A
---____=-.---------_--------_----------------__--_----__---------- -_-------
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS FIRST OUT ANNUNCIATORS
---- =====--------------------------------------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN ANNUNCIATORS
_--_-._--_----_____-------_------=== --_----_--__---__--__-__----_------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
A REACTOR TRIP BRINGS IN MANY ALARMS, SOME OF WHICH GIVE OBVIOUS INFORMATION WHICH DISTRACTS OPERATORS FROM CRITICAL INFORMATION.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW BECAUSE OPERATOR ACTIONS DO NOT RELY SOLEY ON THE ANNUNCIATORS. HIGH STRESS CAUSED BY LACK OF ABILITY TO DETERMINE FIRST-OUT ANNUNCIATORS OR ORDERING OF ALARMS CAN HAVE SERIOUS SAFETY CONSEGUENCES.
-- =_ ------ = ---------------------
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATORS WINDOW WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUTS AND PRIORITIZED INTO 4 CATEGORIES AND CATEGORY 4 ALARMS WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATORS (STILL AVAILABLE ON SEQUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER). ALARMS WHICH SIGNIFY THAT A SIGNIFICIANT TRANSIENT IS IN PROGRESS (CATEGORY 1) WILL FLASH IN RED (REF 6.3.1.4) (REF: MAR 84-08-10-01)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI l cFL
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0290 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.1.58 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS CLEARED ALARMS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN ANNUNCIATORS A
_ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _==_
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CLEARED ALARMS ARE NOT CODED VISUALLY, BY A SPECIAL FLASH RATE, REDUCED BRIGHTNESS, OR A SPECIAL COLOR.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO ACTION REGUIRED, THE EXISTING SYSTEM DOES HAVE A METHOD OF INDICATING CLEARED ALARMS. WHEN AN ALARM RETURNS TO NORMAL, THE WINDOW WILL DIM FLASH AND A SECOND AUDIBLE WILL SOUND.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
_____-__--_-_--_--.--__-__-_--_____-____---____-__________-________ __ ==.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l l
//3 i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . m . . . -. . - - -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0292 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
_-_---_---------- --__-- - ---- ------- -----_-----_.2----___-
DOCUML T NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.2.1F GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS SIGNAL DETECTION
--=-_--- -
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN ANNUNCIATORS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM HAS ONE AUDIBLE ALARM INSTEAD OF LOCALIZED HORNS FOR EACH PANEL. THE ONLY MEANS OF IDENTIFYING FROM WHICH PANEL AUDITORY ALERT SIGNAL ORIGINATES IS TO VISUALLY LOCATE FLASHING ANNUNCIATOR.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON EFFECTS OF CUMULATIVE ANNUNCIATOR HEOs. PRESENTLY THERE ARE APPROX 5 AUDITORY ALARMS USED IN THE CONTROL ROOM, ONE OF WHICH IS USED l FOR THE ANNUNCIATORS SYSTEM. THE ADDITION OF MORE AUDITARY SIGNALS (ONE FOR EACH PANEL) WOULD CAUSE OPERATORS CONFUSION (6.2.2.1C) AND THEY WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO DISTINGISHED FROM EACH OTHER (6.2.2.2) ALL OF THE ANNUNCIATORS HAVE BEEN REVIEWED FOR THEIR INPUT AND SOME ALARMS HAVE BEEN COMBINED FOR MAJORS TRANSIENTS SUCH AS TURBINE OR REACTOR TRIPED TO LESSER THE NUMBER OF ALARMS. ALSO, DUE TO THE WING SHAPE OF THE CONTROL BOARD, THE OPERATORS CAN EASILY LOCATE THE FLASHING ANNUNCIATORS TILE.
( ACTION:
NO ACTION TO BE TAKEN
=------ --
_----_-_-----_--------------------- =-
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3
/N 1
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0294 )
PLANT: CR3 ,
DATE: 07/31/84 l TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION I
REVIEWER: LIDDLE
------------------------------==__-_==- ----------------------------
DATA SOURC3: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 QUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.2C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ALARM RECOGNITION AND IDENTIFICATION
- =------------------------------ _ ----------
i PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN ANNUNCIATORS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
IN CASE OF FLASHER FAILURE OF AN ALARMED TILE, TILE LIGHT DOES NOT ILLUMINATE. FLASHERS ARE TESTED ONCE A WEEK.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNICATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
- ==-- _ - - - - - - - - - ----------- --------
ACTION:
SINCE THIS IS A HARDWARE RESTRICTION OF THE EQUIPMENT, ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS WILL DE ESTADLISHED TO REQUIRE TESTING THE FLASHERS ONCE PER DAY.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
- 3 REFUEL VI i /W
, , _ . - - - . , , - - - , , ., - . _ , - --,,.,----_.,,.-.---.---.,-----_.,.__--.-.-e --.nn. . _ . , , _ ,,,,n-- _,c.
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l
HEO. NO. : 0307 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.6.48 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS USE OF MIMICS
_---- =-- ----------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CN MIMICS
= .-------=__ __ ------------------- -------------------- --
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MIMIC LINES ONLY HAVE FLOW DIRECTION ARROWHEADS AT ENDPOINTS. ARROWHEADS AT OTHER POINTS ON MIMIC LINES WOULD BE HELPFUL.
- - - - - - - = = -_ - ===---------- ------ _ -= -_ -------- --------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE OPERATORS ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE SYSTEMS AND THEREFORE, KNOW THE DIRECTION OF FLOW. IN GENERAL PUMPS AND VALVES ARE OPERATED PER PROCEDURES.
----- _-- _------- ----- ==--- -
ACTION:
ADDITIONAL ARROWS WILL BE ADDED TO THE MIMIC LINES TO INDICATE THE DIRECTION OF FLOW. (MAR 84-08-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
//G
= _ = = . - _ .
l HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD ,
l HEO.NO.: 0312 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
.--------------------------------------------== --------------- _----
REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
=------------
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.3B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO MN TURB TRIPPED, TURB TRIP BYPASS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE ABOVE ALARMS SHOULD BE ON THE ICS PANEL. THEY ARE RPS ALARMS.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -----= ____------- ------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS DASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
---_--__-------_------_- =_-------_-- -_--_-__--_-_---_--_----_- __----_-
ACTION:
ALL ANNUNCIATOR WINDOW WERE REVIEWED FOR THIS INPUT AND THEN PRIORITIZED '
l INTO 4 CATEGORIES. CATEGORY 4 WINDOW WILL BE REMOVED FROM THE ANNUNCIATOR SYSTEM (RETAINED ON SEGUENCE OF EVENT RECORDER). REMAINING WINDOWS WILL BE FUNCTIONALLY GROUPED OVER THIS APPROPRIATE CONTROLS AND BY SYSTEM (6.3.3.3.
( D(2)) AND FUNCTION. (REF: MAR G4-08-10-01)
- _ - -_=_=- = ------------------------=_ ___--------------------- -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE: -
3 REFUEL VI l
187 I
-- - - - - - _-----,,v., ,.,_.-.m ,.,,,,.-_,,.y,,,___,y,_ , . ,,.,y _ - . _ ,_ _ . _ , . , , , , , ,_ _ _ _ , _ ___,,4 _g 4 , , , _ , _
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0313 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.3.38
=---------------------------
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA: ,
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS ARRANGEMENT OF VISUAL ALARM TILES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES DIESEL GEN SUMPS HIGH LEVEL DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE ABOVE ALARM SHOULD BE ON THE PSA PANEL.
= --
RECOMMENDATION:
CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs. THE ONLY SOURCE OF WATER TO CAUSE THIS ALARM IS FROM THE COOLING WATER WHICH IS CONTROLLED ADN MONITORED ON THE ES PANEL, THEREFORE THE ALARM IS APPROPRIATELY LOCATED. (NO ACTION TO BE TAKEN)
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED
=-- =-----------------------------------==_ ---- -----
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
l i
8 l
t
/#
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0324 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 1 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION 1 REVIEWER: LIDDLE l
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.1.5.58
________________ ___ ______==_ ==______________________ ____________
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
3 CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE AUDITORY ENVIRONMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN .
______-__________-_____-____ ==____ __ ______________________ _____
1 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
AMBIENT NOISE LEVELS IN AND NEAR RESTROOM WERE MEASURED AT 72.5 AND 67 DB, RESPECTIVELY, DUE TO FANS. THESE MEASUREMENTS EXCEED RECOMMENDED MAXIMUM NOISE LEVEL OF 65 DB.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE CATEGORY IS BASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF THIS HED WITH OTHER HEOS.
ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW, HOWEVER, SAFETY CONSEQUENCES RESULTING FROM 3
INCREASED STRESS COULD BE SERIOUS.
_______________________________________________________________________= ___
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED THE AREAS REFERED TO ABOVE ARE NOT CONSIDERED PRIMARY ON SECONDARY OPERATOR OCCUPIED AREAS. NEW NOISE SURVEYS PERFORMED INDICATE THAT NOISE LEVELS IN PRIMARY OPERATES ACCUPIED AREAS ARE WITHIN THE GUIDLINES ISTABLISHED IN NUREG 0700
___________________________________________________=- -___________ ______
- CATEGORY
- IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 J
4 i
/19
e- -m>ww w w '---~--v-vvewy--~wg, - - - -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0345 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/01/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION l
REVIEWER: HITZ/KUPIEC/GADDY j l
DATA SOURCE: VERIFICATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.6.3.38 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS CONSISTENCY l
_------------__-_-_-_---_--_---_-------_------------- =_------__------_--
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.* COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATION DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LABELS FOR METERS USED TO MONITOR CONTAINMENT PRESSURE ARE OPPOSITE OF USUAL, USUALLY NUM3ER ON TOP OF LABEL IS FOR SCALE ON LEFT AND VICE VERSA.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE OPERATORS ARE TRAINED IN THE USE OF THESE LABELS. THERE IS REDUNDANT INSTRUMENTATION FOR CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATION.
ACTION:
THE EXISTING LABELS FOR THE CONTAINMENT PRESSURE INDICATORS WILL BE REPLACED.
THE NEW LABELS WILL DE MADE TO INDICATE THAT THE TOP TAG NUMBER IS FOR THE LEFT INDICATOR. ETC. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-02 & MAR 84-08-10-10)
_===____====-----_- ___== -_-_ - _ ___--- __----- _ -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
I 4
/ fC
-4 g- - - -am-- --g--c------f w----m t- -.y---yy-w-y---,-yv*---- +--9------w- -ww r---- --- ,-------c- ---------vi-r-c.y --------wv-i,-+- yov--m--r- -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0351 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/02/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: HITZ/KUPIEC/GADDY DATA SOURCE: VERIFICATION
.----------------------------= ----------_==___------- _
DOCUMENT NO.. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.4E 6.5.1.2B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS PRINTING ON THE DISPLAY FACE} USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES
_ ____-------------------------------- _----== - ---
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO
__-----__-_----__----------__-__--_----_--_-=___==- - -_-_-------___------_-
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
IN STEP 4.2.2 OF PROCEDURE VP-580, METER SCALE IS -4 TO +4. SINCE PROCEDURE ASKS FOR DETERMINATION OF HOTWELL LEVEL AT 7-9 FEET, THE SCALE SHOULD BE O-10 FEET.
- = _ _ _ _ = = - _ _---------------- ._-------------------------- _-----------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE POTENTIAL FOR MISREADING IS HIGH, HOWEVER, MISREADING HOT WELL LEVEL WILL NOT LEAD TO SERIOUS SAFETY CONSEGUENCES.
ACTION:
ACTION TO BE TAKEN THE EFIC MODIFICATION PROVIDES WIDE RANGE HCIW6LL A&B LEVEL INDICA 1 ION WITH INDICATORS HAVING O-15 FEET RANGE ON PSA (6EF: MA3 80-10-66)
== _----- =--_. _=---=_=_ __
( CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l 2 COMPLETE (REFUEL V) l
/9/
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0353 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
=_ =-=-------------------------------------------------------------------------
REVIEWER: LIDDLE
= __ ----------------------
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY !
DOCUMENT NO. 0700 CUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.4A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL TILE LEGENDS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG GLAND STEAM PRESS HI/LO
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ = = = - - - _ _ - - - - - - -
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE MEANING OF THIS ANNUNCIATOR IS AMBIGUOUS.
.--------------=_=- - ==--------------- __ - ___==- _ __ ----
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CATEGORY IS DASED ON THE CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OTHER ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEM HEOs.
ACTION:
WINDOW WILL DE CHARGED TO " GLAND STEAM - SYSTEM -TROUBLE" (REF: MAR 84-00-10-01)
.--------------------------.---------------------------=- -- -------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
l 9L
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l
HEO.NO.: 0354 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.2A
---_-_.-___-_--_--_--------_--__----_---== __-----__---_-__-----_-----_-----
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS SPECIFIC RECORDER TYPES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG TURBINE BEARING VIBRATION RECORDER
====_ =------- __ _===-- =------------------ _-----
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
PARAMETERS ON THIS RECORDER ARE NOT LABELED.
==-------------------------------------------------- __-
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
= ____=--------------------------------_ __--------- ------ --
ACTION:
THIS RECORDER WILL BE REMOVED. THE INPUTS TO THIS RECORDER WILL BE PUT INTO A NEW MULTIPOINT RECORDER TO LOCATED ON TGR PANEL WITH THE INPUT PARAMETERS CORRECTLY LABELLED (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07)
----- ______ _ ==-----------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/ 93
1 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO : 0358 PLANT; CR3 DATE: 08/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION i REVIEWER: CADDY l DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.2.1A 6.8.3.2C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT SEQUENCE} FREQUENCY OF USE}AND FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RD SWV STATUS LIGHTS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ACCORDING TO TABLETOP SURVEY, THESE CONTROLS SHOULD BE ORDERED AS FOLLOWS: A SUPPLY, A RETURN, B SUPPLY, B RETURN. MORE THAN 5 SIMILAR COMPONENTS ARE LAID OUT IN AN UNBROKEN ROW, WITHOUT SPACING OR DEMARCATION.
RECOMMENDATION:
INVESTIGATE FURTHER CONTROLS ARE APPROPRIATELY LABELED DEPICTING VALVE POSITION TO PARTICULAR COMPONENTS. THESE VALVE STATUS LIGHTS ARE ARRANGED ABOVE THE APPROPRIATE CONTROL SWITCH. IN ONLY ONE CASE IS THERE MORE THAN 5 SIMILAR COMPONENTS IN A LINE. ALL OF THESE VALVES SHOULD NORMALLY BE OPEN AND BY GROUPING ALL ISOLATION VALVE INDICATORS TOGETHER FOR EACH CHANNEL, THE OPERATOR CAN MO3E -
READILY DETERMINE AN ABNORMAL CONDITION.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED 1
CATECORY: IMPL5AMEf TATION SCHEDULE:
3 i
.i
/ 9bl
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0378 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/02/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY/HITZ/KUPIEC DATA SOURCE: VERIFICATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.1B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED
-_-----_-----_----_--------___ ==-_-___--_---__
__-----_-_--_--_---- _ =
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS SAID THEY WOULD LIKE A SELECTABLE DIGITAL VOLTMETER ON THE FRONT PANEL FCR READOUTS OF INCORE THERMOCOUPLE TEMPERATURES.
- ____--_____----__--_--- -_----==-- = - -- _-__---___l-- --__-__--
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ICC MODIFICATION SATISFIES'THIS NEED.
==------------------------------- ------------------_ -------------
ACTION:
THE ICC MODIFICATION PROVIDED CONTINUOUS RECORDING ON THE PSA PANEL OF 16 INCORE THERMOCOUPLES, 4 PER CORE GUADRANT, AS A REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLE. THIS PROVIDES INDICATION OF THE DISTRIBUTION OF COOLANT TEMPERATURE OVER ALL REGIONS OF COFE. (REF: MAR 80-10-66)
.---------..------ =====
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 COMPLETE (REFUEL V)
I 1
i l
/7J'
APPENDIX D HE0s which the SAIC Evaluation Report stated had adequate solutions but the solutions had not been implemented. This listing included HE0s 0001, 0013, 0016, 0019, 0023, 0044, 0105, 0110, 0121, 0137, 0146, 0155, 0175, 0185, 0194, 0205, 0208, 0229, 0233, 0263, 0326, 0349, 0375, 0379.
NOTE: HE0s 0044, 0121, and 0146 were also listed in Appendix A as having inadequate or incomplete solutions and were therefore addressed and included under that Appendix. HE0 375 was also listed in Appendix B as having an inadequate or incomplete justification and was addressed and included under that Appendix.
i l Low (AppendixD)D1-3 i
/76 o -e m em. s n -,yw,n-,v.--- , - , . . , - - . - . . - - .
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0001 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.1 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS
=------------------ -----------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SR 6900 V REACTOR AUX BUSES 3A 3B DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CHART RECORDER COVER IS MISSING RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
==------------ -------------------...-- --
_ = _ _ _
ACTION:
THIS CHART RECORDER IS TO DE REPLACED WITH A NEW RECORDER. (REF: M AR 84-08-10-07)
=_ _.----------------------------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
/77
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0013 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: TURNEY
_-._-_--_--__-__-__-__--_-_-----__--_ = _--_-_-______-_________________--
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
_ -=___=------------------------_-----_-___ ------_____--
DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.2D E CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES
_-----------== ____ _ - -----_-
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID. - COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
VR AH-32-FR, AH-35-FR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE SCALE RANGE IS PENCILED IN ON THESE METERS.
- _---------_----__--_-_--_-__--__- =- --____--_-______-__-__ -_--_____-_
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL DE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS WITH CORRECT SCALE RANGES. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07)
--_------- =_ _ _=---------==_ . . - - . - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/98
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0016 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
== - ------------------------------------------- -
DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.1.1.3G GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
-_-__----_--__--_-------------_--- ===-----__---- -- __-= -- ---
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
--- --==. __. ._-------------------------_ --. __---- -------== -
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CHART RECORDER FACE IS MISSING.
i RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE OPERATION OF RB AIR HANDLING UNITS IS NOT BASED ON INFORMATION ON THE RECORDER. THEREFORE, ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW. THERE ARE NO SAFETY CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE OTHER INSTRUMENTATION IS UTILIZED FOR OPERATOR ACTION.
_-------=-- ==- - - - - - - __==---------- -_-__-------
ACTION:
THE EXISTING CHART RECORDERS WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07)
------------------- =--. _ = = = - - - - _ =- _ _ _ - - =-;==-----
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI
/97
. HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0019 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
_---_-_--__- ==----_----- --------_. ---------------_---------------_--
REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6. S.1. 2B
_ _ _ =-------- ----- ---- _-------------
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES
___ __---------___ =------------ -------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RM SS-120-CR
_-----------.---_--_-------_------_----__ ==------------- ----_----
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
A HAND WRITTEN NOTE ON THIS GRAPHIC RECORDER. WITH POINTS FOR CONDENSATE PUMP DISCHARGE AND MAIN CONDENSER HOTWELL, SAYS THAT THE SCALE INCREMENTS ARE INCORRECT, EG .01 IS REALLY .11 MICROMHOS/CM AT 25 C.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE ERROR POTENTIAL IS HIGH SINCE BOTH THE SCALE AND LABEL ARE INCORRECT.
SAFETY CONSEQUENCES ARE LOW BECAUSE THE POINTS BEING RECORDED BELONG TO NON-SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS. ADDITIONALLY A SALT WATER / IMPURITY INTRUSION INTO THE CONDENSATE SYSTEM HAS NO SAFETY CONSEQUENCES.
ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL DE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS WITH CORRECT SCALES. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-06)
.-------------------------------------=_ ---------------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI Zoo
.---------~~--__:---------: . _ _ - . _ _
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0023 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.. 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.5.4.1 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS
_____-______ -- -_-____----_-__________=-----___ ._. __ ___ _ - - - - - _ _ ________
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RM BS-65-PR
, _______________--_---__-___--_____-____-----_-__ =____ ______ ___ _
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THIS GRAPHIC RECORDER SHOWS A 45 MINUTE TIME INTERVAL BETWEEA MAJOR DIVISION LINES ON THE PAPER INSTEAD OF A ONE HOUR INCREMENT USED ON MOST OTHER RECORDERS.
- _ - _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _. _-____________-____-- _==--_____________---_-- . ___
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
_____-_--_____________-_--- __ _==_ _______-__-___---_-_----_--_-_-__ -_____
ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL DE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS WITH PROPER SCALES. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-06)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI 29)
HUMAN ENGINEERING DHSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0105 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS
=--------------- --------
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.2.1 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS DIRECTION OF MOVEMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES , SU FW REG VV FW-39, SU FW REG VV FW-40 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CONTROL MOVEMENTS DO NOT CONFORM TO THE CONVENTIONS USED ON THE REMAINDER OF THE BOARD.
..------------------------------------= _
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THESE CONTROLS WILL DE CHANGED TO CONFORM TO THE CR-3 DESIGN CONVENTIONS DOCUMENT CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-02) i l
j 202.
_ _ _ _ _ __ __ ._. . _ . _ . _ . _ ~ . _ _ , . . _ _ . _ _
5 HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0110 '
PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6. 5.1. EA CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS USA 3ILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES BWST LEVEL DE!CRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SCALE UNITS USED ARE NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE DEGREE OF PRECISION REGUIRED.
READINOS ARE REGUIRED IN O.I FEET WHILE THE METER IS DIVIDED INTO INCREMENTS OF FEET.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE SCALE. THE POTENTIAL FOR ERROR IN READING THE BWST LEVEL, TO WITHIN ONE TENTH OF A FOOT, IS HIGH. THE SAFETY CONSEGUENCES ARE LOW GIVEN THE CAPACITY OF THE TANK.
ACTION:
l NEW SCALES TO RESOLVE THE INCONSISTENCY ARE NOT POSSIBLE. GREEN TRANSPARENT l TAPE WILL DE USED TO MARK NORMAL OPERATING LIMITS. THE NEED TO READ THE BWST LEVEL TO O.I FT IN INCREMENTS IS A TECH SPEC AND NOT AN OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENT. CONTROL ROOM ALARMS EXIST TO ALERT THE OPERATOR THAT THE BWST LEVEL IS APPROACHING THE TECH SPEC LIMIT. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-02)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI l
l 7_03 n..
- . - - , , ,,.e ..
._,--r-,., ,. ,,- - ,_,, .. ,,_,_,- ,. -,.-.,--,-_,e,...y._ ,, ,, , r, , , - ,,,----3 e -,,--g.w,,,* ,
HUMAN. ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0137 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
' REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.5.1.1B j
i CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG EXDT-12 BYPASS, GSV-7 RAISE LOWER
-_--__-_----__---________--____-__---_= ---_______--_-___ _-________-----_
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SEVERAL VALVE CONTROLS APPEAR TO BE LABELED IMPROPERLY.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANCE ERROR POTENTIAL IS HIGH, HOWEVER. THERE ARE LOW SAFETY CONSEQUENCES BECAUSE THESE COMPONENTS BELONG TO NON-SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS.
ACTION:
ACTION TO BE TAKEN CHANGE ESCUTCHEON PLANT FOR EXDT-12(EXV-65) TO EXDT-11 TO AGREE WITH THE i
! PLANT PIPING ARRANGEMENT. CHANGE ESCUTCHEON PLATES AROUND CONTROL SWITCHES FOR GSV-7, CSV-8, AND GSV-65 FROM LOWER-NORMAL-RAISE TO CLOSE-STOP-OPEN (REF: MAR 84-08-10-05)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI
(
l i
l l
- 2. o st l
l HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l HEO. NO. : 0155 PLANT: CR3 i
DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.5C 6.5.1.6C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS SCALE MARKING PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PS -
RC DRAIN TK PRESS WD-22-PI2 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE SCALE HAS A DESIGNATION OF 2.5 AND 7.5 BUT NO ASSOCIATED GRADUATION EXISTS. THE SCALE MULTIPLIER IS PRINTED VERTICALLY VERSUS HORIZONTALLY.
l SCALE NUMERALS ARE LIGHT RED VERSUS THE USUAL BLACK NUMERALS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE OPERATOR IS NOT REGUIRED TO READ A SPECIFIC VALUE BUT IS CONCERNED WITH
, OPERATION WITHIN A CERTAIN RANGE OF VALUES. THE PROBABILITY OF ERROR IN PERFORMING THIS FUNCTION IS LOW. SAFETY CONSEQUENCES EXIST BECAUSE OUTSIDE OF THE RANGE THERE IS A POTENTIAL TO RUPTURE THE RC DRAIN TANK DISC.
ACTION:
THE SCALE ON WD-22-PI2 WILL DE CHANGED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-03) i l
IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l CATEGORY: REFUEL VI i 3 l
i l 107
- - _ _ _ . . . _ . . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ _ . . _ . . _. _ _ . _ _ _ _ m ._ __
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD 4 HEO.NO.: 0175 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 01/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: HISTORICAL DOCUMENT REVIEW
= =----------------------------------------- - --------
DOCUMENT NO.: UDER 80-13 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.8.2.1 6.8.2.2A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
! PANEL LAYOUT SEGUENCE}FREGUENCY OF USE}AND FUNCTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
MUV-69, MUV-62 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
IMPROPER DC ALIGNMENT CAUSED A LOSS OF AUTO CONTROL OF DHV-110. THE OPERATOR UNINTENTIONALLY OPENED MUV-62 VERSUS MUV-69 FURTHER, IN QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSES, OPERATORS NOTED THAT MUV-3 AND-MUV-62 ARE LOCATED ON ES A PANEL,
- WHILE MUV-69 AND MUV-9 ARE ON ES B PANEL. OPERATORS SUGGESTEED PUTTING THE A TO D CROSSTIES ON THE ES 'A' PANEL AND THE B TO C CROSSTIES ON THE ES 'B' PANEL.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
.- . =---------------------
ACTION:
MUV 9 AND MUV69 CONTROL SWITCHES WILL BE RELOCATED TO THE ES 'A' PANEL. MUV l 3 AflD MUV 62 CONTROL SWITCHES WILL DE RELOCATED TO THE ES 'B ' PANEL (REF:
MAR 84-08-10-02)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
, 1 REFUEL VI i
4 l
i e
! 206 I- - , , _ _ . . . , . _ _ _ _ - - - . ~ _ - _ - _ _ . _ _ _ , _ - _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ -,.,. ,,. , ,,---,_._- ._. _ , _ , _ , _ , . . _ , _ , _ , _ _ _ .
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD 4
T HEO. NO. : 0185 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION I
REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: O O2 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.6.3.3A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS CONSISTENCY PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
i THREE DIFFERENT NUMBERING SCHEMES ARE USED IN THE CONTROL ROOM (I.E., B & W, FPC, GILBERT). THIS IS ESPECIALLY CONFUSING FOR PUMP CONTROL SWITCHES ON THE MAIN CONTROL BOARDS.
1 e
. RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE OPERATOR ERROR POTENTIAL IS HIGH. AN ERROR MAY CHALLENGE THE SAFETY SYSTEMS BUT THE SYSTEM WILL PERFORM AS DESIGNED.
ACTION:
DEVELOPED AND IMPLEMENTED A CR3 ABBREVIATION LIST AND INSTRUMENT NUMBERING SYSTEM. THE PANELS WILL DE RELABELED AS APPROPRIATE. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-10)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI 207
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0194 1
PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY I
l DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: O 08 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.2.2A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
- PANEL LAYOUT LOGICAL ARRANGEMENT AND LAYOUT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.
- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
. IC MSV-53, MSV-54 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
- MOV-54 (ISOLATION FOR MSV-11 AND -14. B OTSG TURBINE BYPASS VALVES) IS LOCATED DIRECTLY UNDER HAND / AUTO STATION FOR MSV-9 AND -10 (A OTSO TURBINE A
BYPASS VALVES). MSV-53 (ISOLATION FOR MSV-9 AND -10, A OTSG TUR8INE BYPASS VALVES) IS LOCATED DIRECTLY UNDER HAND / AUTO STATION FOR MSV-11 AND -14 (B OTSG TURBINE BYPASS VALVES).
i _________
l RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW BECAUSE OF OPERATOR TRAINING. CONSEQUENCES OF AN ERROR COULD BE SERIOUS.
ACTION:
MSV-53 WILL DE RELOCATED UNDER HAND / AUTO STATION FOR MSV-9 AND MSV-10 AND MSV-54 WILL DE RELOCATED UNDER HAND / AUTO STATION FOR MSV-11 AND MSV-14 (REF:
- MAR 84-08-10-04)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI i
~lo o
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0205 PLANT: CR3 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION i
j ________________________________________________________________________ ____
1, REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: G 15 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.1.1. 1 B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE ACCESSIBILITY OF INSTRUMENTATION /EGUIPMENT PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
- RCP SEAL DATA RECORDERS, RB SUMP RECORDERS, RM-G 1 29/30, RM-G 19, RCP BEARING TEMPERATURE MONITORS, a WASTE DISPOSAL FEED AND BLEED PERMIT PANELS, COMMUNICATION MERGE SWITCHES, ES TEST SWITCHES DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
OPERATORS REPORTED THAT THE FIRST FIVE COMPONENTS LISTED ABOVE ARE BACK
- PANEL INSTRUMENTS THAT SHOULD BE ON THE FRONT PANELS. THE LAST THREE ARE ON FRONT PANELS AND COULD BE MOVED TO BACK PANELS, IN THEIR OPINIONS.
RECOMMENDATION:
- NO CHANGE i
THERE IS NO ROOM ON THE FRONT PANELS FOR THE FIVE RECORDERS. ALARMS FOR EACH OF THESE PARAMETERS ARE ON THE FRONT PANELS, AS WELL AS METERS OR COMPUTER POINTS FOR SOME. FEED AND BLEED PANEL HAS BEEN R,EMOVED AS PART OF THE EFIC MODIFICATION. MERGE AND TEST SWITCHES COULD BE MOVED IF SPACE WERE NEEDED.
i THEY DO NOT CURRENTLY INTERFERE WITH OPERATIONS.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED j CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 COMPLETE (REFUEL V - MAR 80-10-66)
{
i 207 r
..,- - - ,_ _ _ _ _ _ . - , ,_-n---.,,-__..,.___-. ___ _ , _ .
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD )
HEO. NO. : 0208 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY
== ----------------------_ ------ ----------------
DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: 0 17 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.18 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VIGUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO DE DISPLAYED PANEL / WORKSTATION ID. : COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC OTSG STARTUP LEVEL DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LOW LEVEL LIMIT PORTION OF THIS METER NEEDS TO DE EXPANDED TO A SCALE OF O TO 50.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE EFIC MODIFICATION ADDED TWO NEW METERS TO THE PSA SECTION OF THE MAIN CONTROL DOARD WITH AN EXPANDED LOW RANGE OF 0-150 INCHES. THIS RANGE IS APPROPRIATE FOR ALL OPERATOR TASKS NEEDED TO MEET TASK REQUIREMENTS FOR NORMAL, ADNORMAL OR EMERGENCY SITUATIONS. A NEW 2 PEN INDICATING RECORDER WILL DE ADDED TO THE ICS SECTION WHICH WILL DISPLAY AND RECORD THE SAME OTSG START LEVEL SIGNALS THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON THE PSA SECTION.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-04) 2/O
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0229 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
.----------------------------= -------------------------------------
REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: OUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.- I2 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.2A CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS USABILITY OF DISPLAYED VALUES
= --------------------- __-----------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES , CORE FLOOD PRESSURE GAUGES DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
GAUGES ARE SCALED IN INCREMENTS OF 20 LBS. DUT OPERATORS MUST CONTROL PRESSURE WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 15 LDS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE CHANGE THE SCALE. THE POTENTIAL FOR ERROR IN READING THE CFT PRESSURE, TO WITHIN PLUS OR MINUS 15 POUNDS, IS HIGH. THE SAFETY CONSEQUENCES ARE LOW BECAUSE SUFFICIENT WATER WOULD STILL DE AVAILABLE TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS.
ACTION:
CHANGE THE SCALE. A NEW SCALE (25 PSI /DIV) WILL BE INSTALLED WHICH WILL PROVIDE REGUIRED DIVISION LINES FOR LIMITS OF 575 TO 625 PSI WITH ZONE DEMARCATION USING GREEN TRANSPARENT TAPE TO MARK NORMAL OPERATING LIMITS.
(REF: MAR 84-08-10-02)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI 7!/ /
-- . _ - - - _ _ - _ . . - - - : -=== _- ._ -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0233 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: 'OUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: I3 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.7.3.2 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUB AREA:
PROCESS COMPUTERS ALARM MESSAGES PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DECCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
14 ALARMS FOR 500 Kv CIRCUIT DREAKERS ARE PRINTED OUT INCORRECTLY.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE OPERATOR DOES NOT USE COMPUTER PRINTOUT FOR PLANT OPERATION, THEREFORE, THERE IS NO ERROR POTENTIAL AND NO SAFETY SIGNIFICANCE.
ACTION:
THE COMPUTER I/O LIST WILL DE REVISED TO DELETE THE ALARMS. THEY ARE NOT CONSIDERED TO BE ESSENTIAL.
4 --__--____________--_-_--_---_-_-__---____--_--_-_--_-_---__--_-___----_-------
i CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
1 4 REFLEL VI i
l Z/2.
. . _ _ - . _ , - _ .- --___. _ _ _ _ _ . _ . = = _----- ..; -. - _ - _ - _ _ _ _ .
A HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0263 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 QUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.1.1E CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS GENERAL PRINCIPLES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
CN >
SPRING-RETURN-TO-NORMAL CONTROLS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
SPRINGS IN SOME SPRING-RETURN-TO-NORMAL CONTROLS ARE WORN AND DO NOT RETURN ALL THE WAY TO NORMAL.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE WORK REGUEST PROCEDURES ARE IN PLACE TO HANDLE PROBLEMS OF A MAINTENANCE NATURE.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 CONTINUOUS Z/3
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0326 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.1.2.3D GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE SIT-DOWN CONSOLE DIMENSIONS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN .
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CONTROLS ON TG, ICS, PSA, AND ESF PANELS ARE LESS THAN 3 INCHES FROM FRONT EDGE OF PANEL.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE LOW ERROR POTENTIAL, DUT IF SOMEONE WERE TO INADVERTANTLY ACTUATE EQUIPMENT THERE COULD DE SERIOUS SAFETY CONSEQUENCES.
ACTION: .
ACTION TO BE TAKEN A RAILING WILL DE INSTALLED AROUND THE MCB REF: MAR 84-08-10-13)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL VI 2 /4l
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0349 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/02/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: HITZ/KUPIEC/GADDY DATA SOURCE: VERIFICATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.48 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS PRINTING ON THE DISPLAY FACE PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
. DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
IN STEP 3.1.3 OF PROCEDURE VP-580 (SURGE TANK LEVEL INCREASING), THERE WAS A PIECE OF RED TAPE ON METER THAT SEEMED TO HAVE NO SIGNIFICANCE.
- ---------= ------ ____==---------------- ------------------------ -------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE TAPE WAS SUPPLEMENTAL OPERATOR AID. (TEMPORARY) t ACTION:
THE RED TAPE HAS DEEN REMOVED.
l l --__--_-----__---------___----------_------------_------------------------__---
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 COMPLETE I
I i
l 1
l D[
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0379 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 06/02/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVfEWER: CADDY /HITZ/KUPIEC DATA SOURCE: VERIFICATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.1.1A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS GENERAL PRINCIPLES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.* COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
PO MUV-23, -24, -25, -26 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THESE THROTTLE VALVES ARE NOT TO BE THROTTLED BASED ON B&W RECONMENDATION.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE PROCEDURES WERE CHANGED TO IMPLEMENT B & W RECOMMENDATIONS, THEREFORE, ERROR POTENTIAL IS LOW. HOWEVER, IF AN ERROR WERE TO OCCUR HPI INJECTION COULD BE AFFECTED.
ACTION:
ACTION TO DE TAKEN VALVES HAVE DEEN REPLACED WITH THROTTLEABLE VALVES CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
3 REFUEL V (MAR 82-09-22-01) 2/6
- . - - - _ = _ = . = = _ - . . -
APPENDIX E HE0s which were originally judged as satisfactory by the SAIC Evaluation Report but which FPC has since found necessary to significantly revise in the Reconnendation and/or Action / Justification statement areas.
These HEOs are 0003, 0007, 0017, 0022, 0025, 0039, 0074, 0077, 0094, 0100, 0127, 0143, 0174, 0197, 0243, 0258, 0297, 0308, 0344.
.i I
l l
Low (AppendixE)D1-3 Z/7
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0003 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
, DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.1.2.5B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE VERTICAL PANELS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SR CHART RECORDERS DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CHART RECORDERS ARE LOCATED TOO LOW ON THIS VERTICAL PANEL. DISPLAYS SHOULD DE PLACED IN AN AREA BETWEEN 41 AND 70 INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR.
RECOMMENDATION:
RELOCATE CHART RECORDERS.
ACTION:
EXISTING CHART RECORDERS WILL DE REPLACED BY NEW RECORDERS AND RELOCATED APPROX 68 INCHES A30VE FLOOR. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 1/d
. - - . _ _ . - _ - . _ _ _ . _ = -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0007 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.1.2.5B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL ROOM WORKSPACE VERTICAL PANELS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TR DECCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CHART RECORDERS ARE LOCATED TOO LOW ON THIS VERTICAL PANEL. ;
RECOMMENDATION:
RELOCATE CHART RECORDERS.
ACTION:
THE EXISTING CHART RECORDERS WILL BE REPLACED BY NEW RECORDERS AND RELOCATED APPROX 70 INCHES ADOVE FLOOR. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI i i
2/9
d HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0017 i PLANT: CR3 '
DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.1.1 i
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
l LADELS AND LOCATION AIDS NEED FOR LABELING I
! PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
VR -
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THERE IS A GOOD DEAL OF HANDWRITTEN INFORMATION ON THIS PANEL.
1 a
- RECOMMEND /, TION
CHANGE HANDWRITTEN INFORMATION IS NOT IN LIEU OF LABELING. THE INFORMATION IS AN
, OPERATOR AID. IN LOADING PAPER IN THE CHART RECORDER FOR REACTOR BUILDING TEMPERATURE.
i ACTION:
THE HANDWRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS WILL BE REMOVED WHEN THE NEW REACTOR BUILDING TEMPERATURE RECORDER IS INSTALLED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-07) l r
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l i
4 REFUEL VI i
i e
i 22.o
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0022 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY
b DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.18 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS i
t PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RM RM-R1, RM-R2, NI-10-NR, NI-11-NR, RC-130-FR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE SCALES PRINTED ON THE RECORDING PAPER OF THESE GRAPHIC RECORDERS ARE NOT THE SAME AS THE SCALES SHOWN ON THE RECORDERS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE l
ACTION:
i THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL BE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDERS WITH PROPER SCALES. (REF: MAR 84-09-10-06)
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI z ?-I
i HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0025 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: CADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.1C GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RM RB TEMP MONITOR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THIS GRAPHIC RECORDER IS NO LONGER USED.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THOSE VARIABLES WHICH REQUIRE HISTCRICAL RECORDING WILL BE RECORDED ON A NEW l RECORDER. REMAININO VARIABLES NILL DE ROUTED TO A PATCH PANEL SUCH THAT THEY CAN DE MONITORED WHEN REQUIRED. EXISTING RECORDER WILL BE REMOVED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-06 & MAR 84-08-10-07) i i CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 1
l i
l l
I
- z. 2_?-
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD 1
HEO. NO. : 0039 !
PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
.--------------------------------------------------------------------- i REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.3.1.3 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS FIRST GUT ANNUNCIATORS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
FIRST GUT ANNUNCIATORS HAVE RED LIGHT BULBS AND SMALL RED SOUARES ON THE TILES. IN NVREG-0700. A SEPARATE FIRST DUT PANEL IS RECOMMENDED FOR THE REACTOR AND TURBINE-GENERATOR SYSTEMS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
l FIRST GUT INDICAITON WILL DE ELIMINATED. A NEW SEGUENCE OF EVENTS RECORDER HAS DEEN INSTALLED TO INFORM OPERATORS OF THIS INFORMATION. (REF: MAR I
S4-08-10-01) l CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
! O REFUEL VI l
213
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0074 PLANT: CR3 DATE: G4/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION l
REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.1B CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS CHARACTERISTICS OF GRAPHIC RECORDERS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC NI-9-NR, RC-L-LR, SP-6A-PRI. RC-3A-PRI. RC-4-TR, RC-13-FR, RC-3B-PR, SP-9A-FR, CD-15-FR, SP-1A-LR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE SCALES PRINTED ON THE RECORDING PAPER ARE NOT COMPATIBLE WITH THE SCALES SHOWN ON THE RECORDERS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDERS WILL DE REPLACED BY NEW RECORDERS WITH PROPER SCALES.
(REF: MAR 84-08-10-04)
CATECORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
l 1
224-l l
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0077 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING. STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO. : 6.6.6.4 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS USE OF MIMICS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE METERS FOR RCV-8,9,10 ARE DIRECTLY IN THE PATH OF THE RCS MIMICS. THE
! MIMICS FOR RCS AND FW ARE WORN WITH SOME SECTIONS MISSING.
_--_------___--------__-_--- -----_------= _- ------- -------_-..----
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE ACTION:
THE MIMIC ON THIS PANEL WILL BE REDESIGNED PER HUMAN FACTORS GUIDELINES.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-11)
Z l 5~
- - _ . . . . . - - . -- - . ._-- - _. .-- . . . . . ~ . . - - . . . - . . - - . - - - -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0094 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.4.28 GUIDELINE AREA: CUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS SPECIFIC RECORDER TYPES PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.* COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SF TB-124-TR DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE RECORDER APPEARS TO BE OVERLOADED BEYOND ITS DESIGN CAPACITY. IT IS HARD TO DETERMINE WHICH CHANNEL IS PLOTTED ON THIS RECORDER.
.-------------------------------- =- ------ -----------------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE THE COMPUTER IS THE PRIMARY SOURCE FOR THIS INFORMATION.
ACTION:
THE EXISTING RECORDER IS TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW RECORDER, WITH GREATER j CAPACITY. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-14) i CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 2L2_G
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0100 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/09/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.8.3.2C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL LAYOUT STRINGS OR CLUSTERS OF SIMILAR COMPONENTS
= ==----------------------------------------------- - -------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
SF DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
MORE THAN FIVE SIMILAR COMPONENTS ARE PUT IN A STRING. ELECTRICAL METERS ARE IN A STRING OF SIX.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE GIVEN THE OPERATION OF THIS PANEL AND PANEL LAYOUT, THIS DOES NOT POSE A PROBLEM. ALSO, THE STRING OF METERS IS BROKEN-UP VIA LABELING AND MIMICS.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REGUIRED
==---- _--=_
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 12.-7
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0127 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION l REVIEWER: WEEKS l
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.4.5C CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS ROTARY SELECTOR CONTROLS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TO BRG.VIDR PICKUP CONTROL SWITCHES
==--------------
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE CONTROL SWITCHES HAVE MOVING POSITIONS WITH A FIXED POINTER.
_-__--.-----_-__-__--_____------------= =--_--_--- - - -_--___------_
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
= =------------- - ---- -----
ACTION:
CONTROLS AND ASSOCIATED RECORDERS WILL DE REMOVED. BEARING VIBRATION POINTS WILL BE RECORDED ON A MULTIPEN RECORDERS ON REAR OF BOARD SUCH THAT SWITCHES ARE NO LONGER REQUIRED. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-05 & MAR 84-08-10-07)
== --- ___=-------------------=_____---------------- -
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
l i
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0143 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 04/23/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.9.1.2A GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROL-DISPLAY INTEGRATION MULTIPLE CONTROLS OR DISPLAYS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG ARV-48 49. TURB BEARING VIB. RECORDERS
.------_-_-----------____ ==--------_----- = = - _ _ _ ______---_
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE VACUUM 3REAKER SWITCHES ARE LOCATED TO THE LEFT OF THE CONDENSER VACUUM RECORDER. ALSO, THE SWITCHES FOR THE TURBINE VIBRATION RECORDERS ARE LOCATED SETWEEN THE TWO RECORDERS.
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
- _ - _ - - - - - - - - - - _ = - - - - - _=-_--_ ==__-------------- ----_-----_---- -
ACTION:
TURDINE DEARING VIBRATION RECORDERS AND ASSOCIATED CONTROL SWITCHES WILL DE REMOVED AND THE POINTS RECORDED ON A MULTIPOINT RECORDER LOCATED ON THE REAR OF THE PANEL (REF: MAR-84-08-10-05 & MAR 84-08-10-07)
_--------_--_----- _ __ ===------- _=---_----------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 729
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0174 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 01/16/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION ,
REVIEWER: WEEKS DATA SOURCE: HISTORICAL DOCUMENT REVIEW
__-=- --__-------------------------_----------_. -_--_--------_-
DOCUMENT NO.: UOER 82-15 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.4.2.2
=-------
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
CONTROLS CODING OF CONTROLS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RUPTURE MATRIX TEST SWITCH DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
DURING THE AIR COMPRESSOR SHUTDOWN, THE OPERATOR INADVERTENTLY OPERATED THE MAIN STEAM RUPTURE MATRIX TEST SWITCH. THIS ACTION CAUSED ALL MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVES TO CLOSE WITH A RESULTANT REACTOR TRIP OCCURRING ON HIGH RCS PRESSURE.THE TEST SWITCH FOR THE RUPTURE MATRIX WAS IN THE SAME BOARD SWITCH LINE AS THE AIR COMPRESSOR SWITCHES AND WAS ALSO A SIMILAR SHAPE.
==_- _------------------------- -- ----- --- --------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ==---------- _---------------------- --------
ACTION:
ACTION TAKEN THE RUPTURE MATRIX TEST SWITCHES HAVE BEEN RELOCATED AND ARE FUNCTIONALLY SEPARATED FROM ANY SIMILAR CONTROLS.
- - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - = = - _ = - - __-- -----------------------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
1 (REFUEL V - MAR 80-10-66-17) 230
, .= -
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD ;
HEO. NO. - 0197 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/28/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALVATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: GUESTIONNAIRE AND INTERVIEW DOCUMENT NO.: O 09 0700 GUIDELINE NO.:
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID. : COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
CONTROL PANEL MAINTENANCE WAS CITED AS A PROBLEM BY THE OPERATORS. FOR EXAMPLE, MANY WORK REQUESTS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED FOR WHICH NO ACTION WAS
-TAKEN OR FEEDBACK PROVIDED. SPECIFICALLY, OPERATORS CITED REPAIR NEEDS FOR CHART RECORDERS. .
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ =-------__ ---- _----------- ---------------
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE
=- __ ----=_____=-_ - ----- ===------- _-----
ACTION:
PROGRAM ALREADY INITIATED TO CLEAR UP REQUESTS. ALL EXISTING RECORDERS WILL DE REPLACED WILL NEW INDICATING RECORDERS FOR BETTER MAINTAINABILITY (REF:
MAR S4-08-10)
-_-----------_------------__---------_---- - --== --------------_
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI l
- 2. 7/
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0243 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 02/14/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: GADDY DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY
===_ ==-----------------------------------------------
DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.1F
-_------___-----_----__------ -_---_-_---_----_-=_ -_----- -__--_---___
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GN
- DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
l BAILEY METERS SUPPOSEDLY FAIL MIDSCALE WHICH COULD POTENTIALLY GIVE THE
! OPERATORS A FALSE NORMAL INDICATION.
_--_____-_--__-__-___ - ==--_--_--_-__-_-------- ---------_--_-__-_---------
RECOMMENDATION:
THE D&W OWNERS GROUP I&C WORKING GROUP PREPARED AN NRC SUBMITTAL TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE. CHANNEL FAILURE IS INDICATED AND HAS BEEN HANDLED WELL IN TWO INSTANCES. DOCUMENTED NNI POWER FAILURES WITH METERS GOING TO MID SCALE HAVE RESULTED IN SERIOUS CONSEQUENCES AT CR3. ERROR PROBABILITY RESULTING FROM THIS IS HIGH.
ACTION:
ACTION TAKEN CR3 HAS INSTALLED REDUNDANT INSTRUMENT PANEL AND ADDED A BACKUP POWER SUPPLY FOR NNI Y CHANNEL. FUSES WILL BE ADDED TO POWER LEADS TO PREVIOUSLY UNFUSED PANEL METERS. (MAR 85-10-19-01)
_= -------=. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - -
- CATEGORY
- IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
REFUEL VI 1
l
?_3 2.
l
_ - _ _ -_. _ __ . _ , . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ . - _ _ _
HUMAN ENGINEERING DBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0258 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE
_ _ = __=- ==------- =--
DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.3.1B GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS VISUAL ANNUNCIATOR PANELS
== ------
PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
GENERIC ANNUNCIATOR PANELS
===_ _------------
DESCRIP IICN OF DISCREPANCY:
LABELS ARE NOT ABOVE MATRICES.
.------------------------- -----...---- _ _- =--- =-
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE BECAUSE O~ THE HEIGHT OF THE ANNUNCIATOR PANELS, THE LABELS ARE BELOW THE ANNUNCIATOR MATRICES d' 6/,2. 5 d
.--------.--------------==- =-----_= __ ---------
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION IS REQUIRED
- . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - =
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 i
I l
i i
2'23 l
t
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0297 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: CVALUATION REVIEWER: LIDDLE DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY DOCUMENT NO.- 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.3.4.28 CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
ANNUNCIATOR WARNING SYSTEMS CONTROL SET DESIGN PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
IC ANNUNCIATOR ACKNOWLEDGE
-_-__-_-------_----_--------_---_----_--____--___-_= _______________________
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
ANNUNCIATOR ACKNOWLEDGE PUSHBUTTON ON ICS PANEL IS GREENS SHOULD BE BLACK.
_-_----_-----_-_-----_______===___ _ - _ _ _ _-_ _ _ _ _ ____ ________________
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
-_-------__-------__--_--_- - -= _-_-____-_________________________________
ACTION:
ANNUNCIATORS ACKNOWLEDGE PUSHBUTTON WAS CHANGED TO BLACK TO BE CONSISTANT.
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 COMPLETE 234
- HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD l
l HEO.NO.: 0308 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 07/31/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION l
4
. REVIEWER: LIDDLE l DATA SOURCE: CONTROL ROOM SURVEY i
- DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.6.6.48
--------- --------- ==--------------------- --
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
LABELS AND LOCATION AIDS USE OF MIMICS PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
TG MIMIC LINES
, DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCV:
SOME ARROWS IN STEAM FLOW MIMIC LINES POINT TO NOTHING.
=_-------==____---------= -
===---------= --------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANCE TYPICALLY THESE SHOW A DRAIN VALVE. WHEN OPERATORS LEARN A SYSTEM THEY LEARN WHERE THE SYSTEM DRAINS. NO SAFETY SYSTEM WOULD BE ACTUATED BECAUSE OF ERROR.
ACTION:
LABEL THE STEAN FLOW MIMIC LINES WHERE APPROPRIATE. (REF: MAR 84-08-10-05)
_= ------------------------------------ --------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 1.Y
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0344 PLANT: CR3 DATE: 08/01/84 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: HITZ/KUPIEC/GADDY
=------= _- ---------------_ -------
DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION
____ _-------------= -------- .,------------------ -------
DOCUMENT NO. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.: 6.5.1.1B
_ - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
CUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
VISUAL DISPLAYS INFORMATION TO BE DISPLAYED
=== =-==== ----------------
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.* COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RC DRAIN TANK TEMPERATURE INDICATION
===___---------------------------------=-- ------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - --
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
LOCAL INDICATION FOR RC DRAIN TANK TEMPERATURE WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE ON PSA PANEL.
==__=__= - - - - -------------- ===----- --- -------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ==-----------
ACTION:
RCDT (QUENCH TANK) TEMP INDICATOR WITH RANGE O-400 DEG F WILL BE INSTALLED ON THE PSA PANEL (REF: MAR 84-08-10-03)
------------_=__ ----------------------------=_==== -----_ ---
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 REFUEL VI 22b
APPENDIX F HE0s resulting from the SF8TA effort based on the additional emergency scenario walkthru's.
These HEOs are 0380, 0381, 0382, 0383 and 0384 Low (AppendixF)D1-3 227
- - - , - -e.r,---,, ,-n-,r., , -.rr,-,--,- - - - , . , - - - - , - - - . - , , - - , , , - - - - - - . , , - , - - - , - - - , - - - - - - - - - - - - , - - - - . - - - - -
?
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0380 PLANT:
DATE: 12/12/85 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER; HARLEY
=_ _ ------------------------------------------ -------
DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.-
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
-----------------------------------------------____===- ..----------------
PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID. COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
HV AHF-34 DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE CCNTROL AND INDICATION FOR FAN AHF-34 ARE NOT LOCATED IN THE CONTROL RCOM.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THIS FAN IS FOR THE WELDING HOOD IN THE HOT MACHINE SHOP AND WILL ONLY DE IN OPERATION WHEN PERSONNEL ARE IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. THERE ARE LOW FLOW ALARMS AND FLOW INDICATION IN THE CCNTROL ROOM TO ALLOW OPERATOR l VERIFICATION OF FAN TRIP DUE TO HIGH RADIATION.
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION REGUIRED
! CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 l
i i
l I
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO. NO. : 0381 PLANT:
DATE: 12/12/85 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION REVIEWER: HARLEY 1 DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.:
4 GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
! IC -
RCP-2A-28-2C-2D (RCP OIL LIFT PUMPS)
TO TBP-8 (SEAL DIL PUMP)
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE EQUIPMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE ACTUAL SYSTEM STATUS INFORMATION. THE 4
ECUIPMENT PROVIDES BREAKER INDICATION ONLY WHICH IS NOT A DIRECT INDICATION OF ACTUAL EQUIPMENT STATUS.
--_----------------------- - =-_--------__--------_--_-__--_------_-
, RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE
- THESE PUMPS ALREADY HAVE ALARMS AND/OR INDICATIONS OF CONTROL / LUBE OIL PRESSURE IN THE MAIN CONTROL ROOM WHICH PROVIDE THE OPERATORS WITH A DIRECT INDICATION OF ACTUAL EQUIPMENT STATUS.
, ACTION:
NO FURTHER CHANGE REGUIRED
-_-_-------_----_-------= - ---------_------ - ----- _ ------------
4 CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
4 z77
_ _. = - - . . ._ =- --- -- , - . -_
-. . ~ . . _ . . . - . - . . - .-.
HUMAN ENGINEERING OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.: 0382 PLANT:
DATE: 12/12/85 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
- - - - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = - _-- ------------
REVIEWER: HARLEY
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - =----
DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION
..--------------- -_ __-==_ _-----------------------------------
DOCUMENT NO.. 0700 GUIDELINE NO.:
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL /WCRKSTATION ID.- COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
HV AHF (VENTILATION FANS)
DESCRIP TION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE EQUIPMENT DOES NOT PROVIDE ACTUAL SYSTEM STATUS INFORMATION. THE EQUIPMENT PROVIDES DREAKER INDICATION ONLY WHICH IS NOT A DIRECT INDICATION OF ACTUAL EQUIPMENT STATUS.
RECOMMENDATION:
NO CHANGE THESE FANS ALL HAVE EITHER LOW FLOW ALARMS OR FLOW RECORDERS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM LOCATED IN THE MAIN CONTROL ROOM. THIS PROVIDES THE OPERATORS WITH DIRECT INDICATION OF EGUIPMENT STATUS.
--------------------------------------------.----------_==- -
ACTION:
NO FURTHER ACTION REGUIRED
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - =-----------
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATICN SCHEDULE:
3
~2.40
HUMAN ENGINEERINB OBSERVATION RECORD HEO.NO.- 0383 PLANT:
DATE: 12/12/85 TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION
, REVIEWER: HARLEY
---------------= _ __-----------------------_ _ ===-------------------
DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION
=====____= =------------------------------------------
DOCUMENT NO : 0700 GUIDELINE NO.:
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.* COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
RM Al-RMG 25, A2-RMG 27. B1-RMG 26, B2-RMG 28
_---- = - - - - - - _ = = - - - _ _ _ - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - . . - - - - - - - _ - _ _ ___ -----------
DESCRIP TION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE AUDI3LE ALARM FOR THE MAIN STEAM RADIATION MONITORS CANNOT BE HEARD IN THE FRONT PANEL AREA OF THE MAIN CCNTROL ROOM.
~=-- = -------------
RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE INSTALL A REMOTE ALARM / ANNUNCIATOR ON THE FRONT PANEL TO ALERT THE OPERATOR OF A MAIN STEAM RADIATION ALARM ON THE BACKPANEL.
ACTION:
i AN ANNUNCIATOR WINDOW AT LOCATION PSA-Z WINDOW 8-4, READING MSL HI RAD / FAILURE, HAS BEEN INSTALLED TO ALERT THE OPERATOR OF A MAIN STEAM RADIATICN ALARM CONDITION. THIS ALARM WILL DE MOVED TO WINDOW LOCATION PSA-Z WINDOW 1-05 3Y MAR 84-08-10-01.
---------------------- ______ _= =------
i CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
l 3 COMPLETE (MAR 81-02-72-01) l l
i 1
74/
- - - , = _ = - - - - - - = . - - - - = - = _ - - - -
HUMAN ENGINEERING 08SERVATION RECORD I l
HEO. NO. : 0384 l PLANT:
DATE: 12/12/85 '
TRACKING STATUS: EVALUATION l I
l REVIEWER: HARLEY DATA SOURCE: VALIDATION DOCUMENT NO.: 0700 GUIDELINE NO.:
GUIDELINE AREA: GUIDELINE SUBAREA:
PANEL / WORKSTATION ID.: COMPONENT DESCRIPTION:
ES BS-90-PI, BS-16-PI, BS-91-PI, BS-17-PI
- =--_--_-_-_---- __ ==------ --___----__-__-_--_ -_--_____--- -- _
DESCRIPTION OF DISCREPANCY:
THE REACTOR DUILDING PRESSURE METERS ARE IN UNITS OF PSIA VICE PSIG.
_----- - _ - - - - - - - - - = = - - - ------------ .-_----- ---_--__ __
i RECOMMENDATION:
CHANGE FROM A HUMAN FACTORS STANDPOINT THE METERS SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH ONES HAVING UNITS OF PSIG FOR CONSISTENCY AND INTERPOLATION REASONS.
ACTION:
INDICATORS BS-90-PI, US-16-PI, BS-91-PI AND BS-17-PI WILL HAVE THEIR SCALES REPLACED WITH ONES THAT READ IN PSIG.
___ -----------------------------------_ -- -= _=-__ ------___----
CATEGORY: IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE:
2 REFUEL VI (MAR 84-08-10-02) 242
~