ML20210P789
| ML20210P789 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak  |
| Issue date: | 09/04/1985 |
| From: | Merrill O Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20210P722 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-85-699 ACRS-GENERAL, NUDOCS 8605130504 | |
| Download: ML20210P789 (2) | |
Text
. J.,
[
'g UNITED STATES 8
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
f
,E ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFEGUARDS WASHINGTON, D. C. 20655 NpI.
Aegest 4, 1985 MEMORANDUM FOR:
ACRS Me s
FROM:
/
. Merrill, Staff Engi eer n
SUBJECT:
YOUR COMMENTS ON COMANCHE PEAK SSERs 7 THROUGH 11
REFERENCE:
August 14, 1985 Memorandum for D. Okrent, C.
Michelson and All Other ACRS Members from.0. S.
Merrill Ray Fraley has asked that I remind each of you of the request made in the second paragraph of the referenced memorandum regarding you review of the subject SSERs 7 through 11 prior to the 305th ACRS meeting, September 12-14, 1985. He further requested that you be prepared to comment on the results of your review during that meeting.
Although a written response was not requested, we have received one such response to date from C. Siess. A copy is attached for your informa-tion.
Attachment:
As stated cc: ACRS Technical Staff ACRS Fellows l
hSI A 860417
~
GARDE 85-699 PDR
]
e !.e 1.,
, > kY bOMM!SM. :N
' ~ ~
j
~~~
'1 O
' :t e_. < c a w ' <,
w
..~s j
r' t
To:
STAN SCHOFER From:
CHET SIESS Message #:
643
Subject:
' EOR O.
S.
MERRTLL Submitted:
Sun B/25/85 - 15:31 Received:
No
~
Status:
Private Group:
Open Re Comanche Peak St.3ERs relating to all
'Nos. O and 10.
In SSER 8, egations.
I reviewed in some detailI have reviewed SSER
' Ci vi l and Structural Group.
Piping area and In SSER 10 I the items in the as the Civilin the Hanger and Support areaslooked at the it' ems -in the detail And Structural but not in as much fby the NRC Staff *s efforts areas in SSER S.
I am impressed judgements and conclusions. and am completely satisfied with their tri vi al With very few exceptions, were unsubstantiated, to safety.
just plain incorrect the allegations In the Staff has required the utility ta very few case,s wher
- concern, or nor related of which seem reasonable.
safety in the Staff's hands and I believe that this mattero do various things, all or i n vol ved.
that there is no reason for should be left concerned the ACRS to be e + s me.
m-O
/
6