ML20210L347
| ML20210L347 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Crystal River  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/1997 |
| From: | Jaudon J NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| To: | Gallo R NRC (Affiliation Not Assigned) |
| References | |
| 50-302-96-07, 50-302-96-7, NUDOCS 9708210074 | |
| Download: ML20210L347 (2) | |
See also: IR 05000302/1996007
Text
__
e
o
/
NUCLEAR REGU T
COMMISSION
o
'f
- TTNA.
G
g * v ,/
January 14. 1997
.**
MEMORANDUM TO:
Robert M. Gallo, Chief
Special Inspection Branch
' Division of Ins)ection and upport Program
Or
of Nu
3r
actor egulation
. J udo . N ct r
FROM:
on
ivision of Reactor Safety
SUBJECT:
REGIONAL ACTION ON POTENTIAL ENFORCEMENT ACTIONS RESULTIN
FROM THE CRYSTAL RIVER INTEGRATED PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT
'
INSPECTION
This
Js to your memorandum of September 26, 1996, to Ellis W. Merschoff
conce
Integraceu Performance Assessment Process. proposed enforcement actions resulting
Your memorandum listed five potential enforcement actions. Our planned
disposition of each is provided below.
Proposed Violations A and B were both against 10 CFR 50 A)pendix B. Criterion
XVI and concerned the licensee's failure to issue Problem Reports for issues
/
requiring correction. The Region issued a Violation for essentially the same
issue in Inspection Report 50-302/96-07. The licensee has informed the Region
that they have revamped their problem reporting system effective November 18,
1996.
The Region plans to inspect this new process prior to restart of the
facility and to verify independently that it is effective and meets regulatory
requirements.
Since your proposed enforcement actions in these instances are
apparently additional examples of a Violation recently cited we do not
alan
to issue these examples as a new, separate Violation.
We believe that tie
follow up inspection already planned will resolve the issue effectively.
Proposed Violations C and 0 were for making a change under 10 CFR 50.59. in
which an Ureviewed Safety Question was not addressed: and for performing an
incorrect and non-conservative engineering calculation. Inspection Reports 50-
302/96-12 & 96-19
escalated enforcement action items. address these and other related issues and identify the
A Predecisional Enforcement Conference
has been scheduled for January 24, 1997.
Proposed Violation E was against 10 CFR 50.65, the Maintenance Rule.
This
proposed Violation was reviewed by the National Review Panel who reviews all
proposed actions under 10 CFR 50.65.
The National Review Panel found that
your preoosed action was not a violation, because the failures occurred before
the Maintenance Rule went into effect.
planned based on your findings.
No further enforcement action is
s 0
'
.
9708210074 970114
h
h
DR
ADOcK 0500
2
e)
a
.
.
R. M. Galls
2
The Region has been and will continue to follow up on the other unresolved and
inspector followup items in Inspection Report 50-302/96-202.
Since your memorandum was placed in the docket, this response is also
docketed.
cc:
J. Johnson DRP
K. Landis. DRP
D. Norkin. NRR
Docket File
..
l
!
_
J