ML20210D496

Forwards Fee Workpapers for 10CFR171 Final Notice of Rulemaking Scheduled for Fr Publication on 860917,for Placement in PDR & Document Control Sys

ML20210D496
Person / Time
Issue date:	09/17/1986
From:	Holloway C NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:	Bailey I NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
References
RULE-PR-171-MISC AC30-2-58, NUDOCS 8609190229
Download: ML20210D496 (181)

Text

-

b" 1

=

p nu -

/g kg UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

[

$ j WASHINGTON, D. C 20555

%, ...../

SEP 171986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Inez K. Bailey, Chief Records Services Branch, TIDC, ADM FROM: C. James Holloway, Jr. , Director License Fee Management Staff, ADM N

SUBJECT:

FEE WORKPAPERS FOR 10 CFR 171 FINAL NOTICE OF RULEMAKING Enclosed are two sets of the workpapers in support of the Final Notice of Rulemaking scheduled for publication in the Federal Register on September 18, 1986. Please advance one set of the workpapers to the Public Document Room by September 18, 1986. The second set can proceed normally through the DCS system.

Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

\ .

/ ,

(,? 5 , . . }l]r cl twA -l;l PcM C James Holloway, Jr., Director ficense Fee Management Staff Office of Administration

Enclosure:

Workpapers i

l l

l eg91 229 860917 171 MISC ppg

TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Final Fee Rule (10 CFR 171) Required by the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 (P.L.99-272)

B. Determination of Annual License Fees for Operating Reactors C. FY 1987 Budget Estimates

1. Sumary of NRC Generic Program Costs Related to Operating Reactors

2. Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Generic Costs for Operating Reactors

3. Office of Inspection and Enforcement Generic Costs for Operating Reactors

4. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards Generic Costs for Operating Reactors

5. Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research Generic Costs for Operating Reactors

6. Office of Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data Generic Costs for Operating Reactors D. Estimated FY 1987 Collections / Billings Under Part 170 -

E. Reactor Inspection, Licensing and Part 55 Fees Assessed for One-Year Period Under 10 CFR 170 F. Listing of Licensed Operating Nuclear Power Reactors G. Summary of Comments 1

e O O

[7590-01]

j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPNISSION 1

i 10 CFR Parts 51 and 171 AnnualFeeforPowerReactorOperatingLicenses( j l

and Conforming Amendment .;

I AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Final rule.

SUMMARY

1The Nuclear Regulatory Connission is adding to its regulations a new regulation. that will impose an annual fee on power reactors with operating licenses. This annual fee will recover allowable NRC budgeted costs for provid-

.ing regulatory services to power reactors with operating licenses and will not alter the existing fee schedule under 10 CFR Part 170. The annual fee is necessary to comply with the statutory mandate of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985.

EFFECTIVE DATE:

• i 1

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert L. Fonner, Office of the General Counsel, 1 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555 Telephone: 301-492-8692.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Contents I. Background A. Authority for the Rule B. Revisions and Effect on Existing Fee Schedule

• Thirty days after date of publication in the Federal Register. [

O O II. Sumary of Coments III. Resolution of Comments IV. Section-by-Section Revision I. BACKGROUND A. Authority for the Rule s

TheConsolidatedOmnibusBudgetReconciliationAct(COBRA)of1985(P.L.99-272,1986), requires the Nuclear Regulatory Comission to assess and collect annual charges from persons licensed by the Comission pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.) in an amount to approximate 33 per-

' cent of the Commission's estimated budget.

Section 7601 of the Budget Reconciliation Act states that the charges assessed shall be established by rule and, specifically, in paragraph (b)(I) that:

...the Nuclear Regulatory Comission shall assess and collect annual charges from its licensees on a fiscal year basis, except that--

(A) the maximum amount of the aggregate charges assessed pursuant to l

this paragraph in any fiscal year may not exceed an amount that, '

when added to other amounts collected by the Comission for such fiscal year under other provisions of law, is estimated to be equal 1

to 33 percent of the costs incurred by the Comission with respect to such fiscal year; and

O O (B) any such charge assessed pursuant to this paragraph shall be reasonably related to the regulatory seriice provided by the Comission and shall fairly reflect the cost to the Comission of providing such service.

The legislative history shows that Congress intended the authority of this mandate to go beyond that contained in the Independent Offices Appropriation Act (10AA) of 1952 (65 Stat. 290; 31 U.S.C. 9701). The Congressional Managers of COBRA,indescribingthisiegislativeprovision, asserted:

The charges assessed pursuant to this authority shall be reasonably related to the regulatory service provided by the Comission and fairly reflect the cost to the Comission of providing such service.

This is intended by the conferees to establish a standard separate and distinct from the Comission's existing authority under the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952 in order to permit ,

the Comission to more fully recover the costs associated with regulating various categories of Comission licensees.

See 132 Cong. Rec. H879 (Daily Ed. March 6, 1986); 132 Cong. Rec. 52725 (Daily Ed. March 14, 1986.

The NRC is construing this legislation to permit it to charge licensees not only for special benefits provided to individual licensees, as that term has been used in construing the 10AA, but also to recover the cost of any Comission activity reasonably related to regulating power reactors licensed to operate.

O O

, l l

B. Revisions and Effect on Existing Fee Schedule The proposed rule (July 1, 1986; 51 FR 24078) provided that applicants for power reactor operating licenses or holders of power reactor operating licenses and

! major materials licensees would pay an annual fee in lieu of all other fees.

! The final rule will impose an annual fee on power reactors with operating licenses. The annual fee under 10 CFR Part 171 will be based on NRC budgeted costs for providing the following regulatory services to power reactors with cperating licenses: (1) research activities directly related to the regulation ofpowerreactorsonagenericbasis,(2)powerreactorplantregulation(except licensing and inspection activities, and Part 55 operator licensing and instructor certification), and (3) safeguards activities for power reactors (other than those activities directly associated with plant-specific licensing and amendments).

Th'is fee will include costs for many operating reactor-related regulatory costs notrecoveredunderNRC'sexistingfeeschedule,10CFRPart170(49FR21293; May 21, 1984), which established fees for some regulatory services that NRC i

provides its licensees.

The proposed rule provided that Part 170 would be suspended and, therefore, no fees would be collected under the 10AA. This proposal also relieved small materials licensees of all fees. The final rule provides that Part 171 will not affect the existing 10 CFR Part 170 fee schedule. This means that all fees currently collected under 10 CFR Part 170 will continue to be collected, includ-ing those from small materials licensees. Thus, under the final rule, holders of power reactor operating licenses will pay an annual charge (COBRA) under Part 171 and 10AA fees under Part 170. Other applicants and licensees will pay fees i l only under Part 170.

l

]

i l

_._ . w

O O

The Commission has placed in its Public Document Room at 1717 H Street, NW.,

Washington, D.C., data used in developing the proposed 10 CFR Part 171, copies of the coments received, and a separate document that categorizes and sumarizes these comments by facilities, Agreement States, and materials licensees.

l II. St# MARY OF C0teENTS Only three commenters supported the proposed rule; the majority of the sixty-one i

I comments discussed eleven common concerns:

1 1

1. Cons'titutionality of the Annual Fee

2. Exclusion of Some Licenses from Fees

3. Collection of One-Third of the NRC Budget j 4 Inclusion of Research Costs in Fee Base

5. Fines, Penalties, Interest, and Reimbursements

6. Basing the Fee on Size of Reactor

7. High-Level Waste Fund i 8. Exemption Provision

9. Quarterly Assessments

10. Adjustments

11. Comment Period 1

]

Twelve commenters thought the proposed fees to be unconstitutional, and four l commenters said no annual fees should be assessed to recover NRC costs for providing regulatory services, but, rather that the public, as the real bene-i j ficiary of NRC regulatory services, should support the regulatory costs of the l NRC. Thirty-four commenters, in opposition to the proposed rule, requested that small materials licenses be subject to fees charged by the NRC.

l l

O O i

Two comenters stated that relief should be given from the proposed fees for uranium mills licenses. One commenter thought that suspended license j

applications, with minimal activity, should not be subject to the proposed annual fee because the fee would be disproportionately large in relation to the profit realized in that circumstance. One comenter also thought that operating license

)

l (OL) applicants would not be receiving a benefit from the activities upon which 1

the proposed fee was based and would, in effect, have a double fee burden because

~

they would pay the annual fee in addition to fees previously paid under Part 170.

f One commenter asserted that " Architect-Engineers, vendors, test reactors, waste i repositories and others..." should pay annual fees.

I i

Several commenters expressed the view that the NRC was not required to collect l

j -a full 33 percent of its budget. Eleven commenters held the view that agency 4

research costs should not be included in the cost basis for detennining the t annual fee. Two commenters asserted that fines, interest, and penalties should be ir.cluded in the cost basis for the proposed fees. Ten comenters thought the j annual fee should be assessed on the basis of power rating in thermal megawatts i (one comenter opposed this suggestion). One commenter thought that the Depart-l ment of Energy high-level waste program fund should be subject to fees. One

! comenter said that an exemption provision was needed for small and expensive-to-operate reactors because of the disproportionate burden that the proposed l; rule would impose on the resources generated from these reactors. Six comenters I thought that fees should be collected on a quarterly or a monthly basis.

Comenters urged that, should excess fees be collected, a provision for refunds l be included in the rule. Finally, several comenters thought that the comment i

period for the proposed rule was too short.

f 1  !

o o

' No comments were received regarding the proposed amendment to 10 CFR Part 51, which provides that promulgation of Part 171, and future amendments thereto, does not require preparation of an environmental impact statement or assessment.

1 III. RESOLUTION OF COMMENTS i

1. Constitutionality of the Annual Fee 1

j Comment: .Many of the consnenters argued that the Commission was imposing an ,

! unconstit6tional' tax.

I Response: The thrust of commenters' arguments was that the Comission's proposal i -

violated constraints on user fees established by the Supreme Court in National l Cable Television v. United States, 415 U.S. 336 (1974) and Federal Power i

! Commission v. New England Power, 415 U.S. 345 (1974) and further developed in i

subwquent decisions by courts of appeals. In National Cable and New England Power,

! 1 l

the Supreme Court examined agency authority to assess fees pursuant to a  :

l particular statute, the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952. The l

Court there adopted a limiting construction of the 10AA to avoid a Constitu-tional question of whether certain language of the 10AA amounted to a delegation l

i to assess " taxes" rather than " fees." The Court indicated that the legislative history of the 10AA did not reveal an intention on the part of Congress to dele-gate its taxing authority to Federal agencies. In short, the Court's analysis was largely limited to the 10AA itself. The commenters, however, appear to read i

i these cases as establishing general Constitutional limitations on an agency's l 1

1 j power to assess fees. Accordingly, many of the commenters argued that because j i

I 1 l 4

l.

O O i

the NRC was not only charging for "special benefits" provided to identifiable  :

recipients of NRC services, but also recovering the costs of its generic rule-making and research activities, the NRC was imposing an unconstitutional tax. l The Connission finds these legal arguments to be unpersuasive. The comenters' arguments are based on the faulty premise that the only legally acceptable standard l for assessing fees is that contained in the 10AA. In Section 7601(b)(B) of COBRA, Congress provided that annual charges assessed by the NRC "...shall be reasonably related to the regulatory service provided by the Comission and shall: fairly reflect the cost to the Comission of providing such service."

The underlying legislative history makes clear that this provision is intended by the conferees to establish a standard separate and distinct from the Comission's existing authority under 10AA in order to permit the Comission to more fully recover the costs associated with regulating various categories of Comission licensees. Statement of Managers Re NRC Fees, 132 Cong. Rec. H.879 (Daily Ed.

March 6,1986);132 Cong. Rec. S. 2725 (Daily Ed. March 14,1986). Congress undeniably has the authority to provide a fee standard distinct from the 10AA, provided that the standard satisfies Constitutional requirements.

In numerous cases the Supreme Court has addressed the issue of whether Congress has unconstitutionally delegated legislative power to administrative agencies.

A reading of those cases indicates that Congress may delegate its authority to administrative agencies provided that it sets forth intelligible standards for the agency to follow in carrying out the Congressionally prescribed policy.

Hampton,Jr.&Co.v.UnitedStates,276U.S.394(1928). A delegation is not unconstitutional simply because the determination of facts and the inferences to O O be drawn from them in light of the statutory standards and declaration of policy call for the exercise of judgment and for the formulation of subsidiary administrative policy within the prescribed statutory framework. Yakus v. United States, 321 U.S. 414, 425 (1944).

In COBRA, Congress has laid down an intelligible standard for the Comission to apply and has articulated its policy objectives. Simply put, the NRC is to recover approximately 33 percent of its budget from user fees (see Statement of Managers Re NRC, Fees) and is to assess fees based on the standard articulated above. We believe this delegation of authority to the NRC satisfies all i

Constitutional requirements.

'The courts have previously considered the issue of whether a fee can be charged J

! for a service provided by the Government that benefits not only the licensee, but f also the general public. The Courts have held that the mutual benefit of a l Government service to the recipient and to the public is not a legal bar to the imposition of fees. Prorating of costs on the basis of benefit to the public is not required. Mississippi Power & Light Co. v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 601F.2d223(1979), cert, denied 444U.S.1102(1980).

Thus the only question that remains is whether the fee schedule promulgated by

! the NRC falls within the parameters authorized by Congress. We believe that it clearly does. Following the Congressional mandate, we are attempting to collect l a third of our budget in fees and, as explained elsewhere in this notice, have r

carefully developed a schedule which ensures that fees assessed are reasonably )

related to the NRC costs of providing regulatory services.

O O

2. Exclusion of Some Licenses from Fees Comment: Agreement States and some other comenters asserted that the proposed rule, in eliminating fees for small materials licensees, would have a severe adverse effect on State fee programs and that 10 CFR Part 170 should be retained in order to maintain reasonable fees for materials licensees.

Many commenters asserted that the Comission had misconstrued Congressional intent by proposing the suspension of collections under the 10AA--the authority for the current Part 170. Commenters argued that the Congress contemplated that the NRC would continue to collect fees under the 10AA, as well as COBRA.

Specifically, many comenters vigorously argued that Congress contemplated that

'all licensees should pay fees and that the NRC lacked authority to exempt all small materials licenses from payment of fees.

i l Response:

The Comission believes it did not misread the Congressional intent, and that it has the authority under COBRA to suspend collections under Part 170 and not charge fees to small materials licensees. The Comission, nonetheless, has decided to retain Part 170 as a means of more equitably distributing the agency costs among those receiving services.

The final rule will not affect materials licensees; they will continue to pay only fees chargeable under Part 170. Major materials licensees will not be subject to an annual fee, as previously proposed. OL applicants similarly will remain subject only to fees under Part 170. With the issuance of an operating l license, a former OL applicant will be subject to the annual fee required under l

O O this final rule in addition to the other fees collected for services covered by Part 170. If an OL applicant receives its OL license during the year, it will pay only a prorated annual fee for that year, because, under the final rule, Part 170 will remain in effect, and fees will be collected under Part 170 up to the time of issuance of the OL. The applicants for licenses and holders of these licenses for test and research reactors and waste repositories will also

! continue to pay fees under that part. Vendors will also continue to pay fees under Part 170.

3. Collection of One-Third of the NRC Budget Comnent: The Comission is not required by Section 7601 of the COBRA to collect

'the full 33 percent of its budget.

4 I Response: The Budget Reconciliation Act provides that the " maximum amount of i

}

the aggregate charges assessed may not exceed an amount that...is estimated to be equal to 33 percent of the costs incurred by the Comission with respect to such fiscal year...." On its face, this is a ceiling, i.e., it would permit the Comission to charge user fees of less than 33 percent. However, the legislative history clearly indicates that Congress expected tne NRC to charge the full amount authorized by the statute. The Statement of Managers, which was drafted to reflect the views of the Conference Comittee that considered the legislation and was inserted into the Congressional Record as part of the floor debate on the measure, states:

l 1

J 1

O O The conferees agreed to require the NRC to assess and collect annual charges from its licensees in an amount that, when added ,

to other amounts collected by the Comission shall not exceed 33 percent of the Comission's budget for each fiscal year. Assuming the current level of NRC expenditures, this is expected to result i

in the collection of additional fees in an amount up to approximately l

$80 million per year for each fiscal year.

132 Cong. Rec. H. 879 (Daily Ed. March 6,1986);132 Cong. Rec. S. 2725 (Daily Ed. March 14,1986). '

We read this limited legislative history as indicating that Congress expected this legislation to result in approximately $80 million in collections each year above that already collected by the NRC under Part 170. To meet this target, collecting a full third of the NRC budget is required.

Such an interpretation is also consistent with the President's request to Congress that the NRC recover a far greater amount of its budget from user fees.

The President in his proposed budget to Congress for fiscal year 1987 had i suggested that 50 percent of the NRC budget be recovered through user fees, a l

figure adopted by the House of Representatives, but reduced in Conference Comittee.

i

O O 4 Inclusion of Research Costs in Fee Base Comment: Commenter: argued that the NRC research costs should not be recovered through fees.

Response: Comenters argued for instance that a boiling water reactor (BWR) 1 licensee under the proposed rule would be paying for research on a pressurized waterreactor(PWR)andviceversa. This could result in one group of licensees subsidizing another. It was also argued that other research costs may be rele-vant only;to future generations of reactors, but of no benefit to the current reactors. The Commission has reviewed again the research portion (as well as the Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards, Nuclear Reactor Regulation.

-Inspection and Enforcement, and Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data portions) of the cost basis for the annual fee. The purpose of this review was to ensure that only generic costs associated with all power reactors, with operating licenses, regardless of type, were included in the cost basis. Costs for research rulemaking and other activities not relevant to all reactors will not be recovered through fees. A detailed breakdown of costs to be recovered is '

available in the NRC Public Document Room in Washington, D.C. Based on this review, the cost basis for the annual fee has been revised as follows:

J FISCAL YEAR 1987 PROJECTIONS OF NRC COSTS FOR NUCLEAR l POWER REACTOR REGULATORY GENERIC PROGRAMS (Dollars in thousands) i i

Costs for i Programs Regulatory 1

l Services ,

i k

i Research............................................ $ 74.356 I Sa fe g u a rd s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,326 I

i Reactor regulation.................................. 24,346 I Inspection and enforcement ......................... 15,482

(

l Analysis and evaluation of operational data......... 7.720 i

Tota 1..................................... $124,230

{

J f

Because the costs listed above apply to all power reactors, the costs have been divided equally for purposes of calculating the annual fee. This approach is

{ consistent with the Congressional directive that all fees be reasonably related 1

i to the cost of providing services.

4 i

t

5. Fines Penalties Interest, and Reimbursements

)

l I Comment: Commenters said that fines, interest, penalties, and reimbursements '

j i should be included in the cost basis as collections under other laws.

I 1

i I a f

1 l

O O I

Response: The commenters argued that COBRA provides that the maximum total of fees to be collected by the NRC may not exceed, when added to other amounts  :

l collected by the Commission, 33 percent of the Commission's budget. Accordingly, .

they believe the 33 percent total is to be derived by adding fees collecced to fines, interest, penalties, and reimbursements collected. The Commission rejects this argument. Fines and penalties are charged because of the failure of a licensee to adhere to prescribed standards or requirements. No public policy would be served by reducing a power reactor's annual fee because a utility l violated NRC's requirements. We are unwilling to attribute such an intent to Congress.. Nor do we believe Congress contemplated reducing fees to account for

interest paid to the NRC. Interest is assessed only for late payment of monies due the United States. Accordingly, interest is not included in the cost base.

Finally, the NRC receives reimbursements from other Federal agencies of approxi-mately $50,000 per year. We have not included this sum in the fee base. The purpose of COBRA was to generate additional Federal revenue as compensation for services rendered by the NRC. The transfer of funds from one Federal agency to another does not result in increased Federal revenue. Accordingly, Congress did not contemplate that reimbursements would be in the fee base.

6. Basing the Fee on Size of Reactor 1

Comment: The annual fee should be based upon the power rating in thermal megawatts  !

l

! for each reactor. l l

j l

O O  !

i i

i Response: The Comission has considered calculating the annual fee on power l reactors with operating licenses on the thermal megawatt ratings of those reactors. An argument can be made that the larger the reactor, the greater the l

l licensee's ability to generate income to pay the annual fee. The COBRA, i

l hewever, requires that the fees be reasonably related to the agency's costs of i

! providing services to the licensee. As discussed in the proposed rule (51 FR 1

f, 24078,24082-3), the Commission has examined the relationship between megawatt

! rating and the costs of NRC regulation. The NRC finds no necessary relationship i

! or predictive trend between the thermal megawatt rating of a reactor and NRC l

li regulatory costs (see Memorandum to Files

• entitled " Reactor Inspection Licensing i and Part 55 Fees Assessed for One-Year Period," dated July 7, 1986, from James l Holloway, Acting Director, License Fee Management Staff Office of Administra-l tion). Accordingly, the Comission has determined that fees should not be based i

l on the size of the reactor. Nevertheless, in recognition of the problem that '

l some licensees of smaller reactors may have in paying substantially increased  ;

I i

fees, the Commission has provided for fee exemptions. This issue is discussed l in item 8 Exemption Provision. ,

t i

l

7. high-level Waste Fund

)

i f Coment: The Department of Energy (DOE) should be assessed fees, payable from the high-level waste fund, for NRC services provided toward high-level waste i

j management.

I i

• A copy of this memoradnum is available for review at the NRC Public Document Room, 1717 H Street, NW., Washington, D.C.

l l

l

- 16 .-

O O Response: The Commission has no legal authority to charge the DOE fees for NRC staff work associated with high-level waste. The 10AA and the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, do not authorize the NRC to charge the DOE fees. The Comission does not construe COBRA as augmenting NRC authority in such a way as l to permit the NRC to collect fees from the DOE.

i,

, 8. Exemption Provision

! Coment: One commenter, a holder of a license for a small reactor, requested that provision for exemptions from the full annual fee be incleded in the final l rule.

i l

' Response: While the Comission is concerned with recovering its costs, it is not l

j the intent of the Comission to promulgate a fee schedule that would have the effect of imposing fees at such a level that the owners of the handful of small, older reactors would find it in their best economic interest to shut their reactors down. Tnerefore, the Comission has included an exemption provision that takes reactor size and age and other factors into consideration in determining whether a license should be exempted from the full annual fee.

9. Quarterly Assessments i

Comment: Several comenters were concerned with the size of the annual fee and its I

effect on their cash flow. The comenters also suggested that the NRC not require payment of fees in a single lump sum.

i

O O Response: In recognition of these concerns, the Comission will collect the annual fee under Part 171 in equal quarterly installments. . Fees collected under Part 170 will continue to be collected under the payment schedule set forth under that part.

10. Adjustments Comment: Provision should be made for refunds if the total of fees collected exceeds 33 percent of the NRC budget enacted by Congress. '

Response: The Comission agrees with commenters that the possibility exists, under both the proposed and final rules, that the aggregate of collections under Parts 170 and 171 could exceed the statutory limit of 33 percent of the NRC budget in a given fiscal year. Therefore, a section has been added to the final rule which requires that any such overpayment be returned on a prorata basis to those who pay fees under Part 171. Provision is also made for adjusting the refund to take into account any power reactors that were given an operating license during the course of the fiscal year and thus did not pay the full fee.

If the prorata share of the overpayment is $10,000 or less, it will be credited i

against the annual fee for the following fiscal year.

Finally, if a final appropriation for the NRC has not been passed at the time the annual fee is set and if the final appropriation is greater or less than the projection, the annual fee would be raised or reduced, as appropriate, and an adjustment to the remaining quarterly installments or a refund would be made,

! as appropriate.

I

O O

11. Coment Period Coment: Some commenters argued that the Comission should have provided for more than a 15-day coment period on the proposed rule.

Response: The Comission was under a statutory mandate to promulgate final fee i

regulations 45 legislative days after submission of its July 7,1986, report to Congress on user fees. A longer comment period would have prevented the i

Comission from. meeting the Congressionally mandated deadline. Under the circumstances, the coment period was reasonable, particularly because licensees were on notice in April when COBRA was enacted that the NRC would be proposing substantially higher fees. Moreover, based on the thoroughness of the comments received and the numerous issues raised in them, the Comission is convinced that all relevant issues of importance to this rulemaking have been identified and that the commenters have not demonstrated that they have been prejudiced by i

the 15-day coment period.

IV. SECTION-BY-SECTION REVISION Section 171.1 -- Purpose.

The purpose section is revised to state that Part 171 sets out the fee to be charged persons licensed to operate a power reactor as defined in the new part.

Section 171.3 -- Scope.

i i The scope is revised to state that Part 171 applies only to persons licensed to operate a power reactor.

i- O O i i

l Section 171.5 -- Definitions.

l In the final rule, the definitions for " Materials license " " Source material,"

and "Special nuclear material" have been deleted because licenses for these materials will remain subject to the appropriate fee schedules under 10 CFR Part 170. The definition for " Nuclear power reactor" has been modified to conform with the definition for " Power reactor" in 10 CFR Part 170.

. Section 171.11 -- Exemption. ,

As stated in the proposed rule (51 FR 24078, 24082), the Congress urged the Conunission to consider the impact of its fee schedule on certain licensees.

Based on coments received, the Comission has determined that it is appropriate I to take a similar approach in setting the fee schedule for power reactors with operating licenses. Accordingly, the added Exemption secticn provides that the holder of a license to operate a power reactor who believes that the annual fee is unfair or overly burdensome may apply to the Comission for partial relief j

from the annual fee. The Comission may grant such relief, if it is persuaded j by the licensee that factors such as age and size of the plant and size and impact on its customer rate base substantially reduce the NRC's regulatory costs for that plant and the benetits bestowed on that licensee below that of the i other power reactors. Nevertheless, the agency's intent is to grant exemptions i

sparingly.

i i

1 ,

i i

-.- -,._.-,,_ , . , , - . _ , , , - , , , _ . , , , - - . , , . . _ .-..,-__,.n- .,. - ._-.--,,.-n.,--...- -e. . - - _ - . , _ -

O O Section 171.13 -- Notice.

1 This section, which was section 171.11 in the proposed rule, is revised to .

reflect that only power reactors licensed to operate are covered by the final rule.

Section 171.15: Annual Fee: Power Reactor Operating Licenses.

The proposed section 171.15, Annual Fee: Materials Licenses, has been deleted.

This renumbered section on computing the annual fee is revised to reflect that only power reactors will be subject to the annual fee under Part 171. The formula was also revised to deduct the estimated fees to be collected under Part 170. The fees under Part 170 are estimated for fiscal year 1987 to be

$37 million. It is estimated that approximately $30 million of this amount will come from power reactors with operating licenses. The annual fee will be charged to every power reactor unit licensed to operate as of October 1,1986 (assumed to be 101 reactors), and, on a prorata basis, to any power reactor licensed to operate during the fiscal year. If a power reactor licensee has only the 4

authority to possess nuclear material and the Cc mission has received a request from the licensee to amend its license to permanently withdraw its authority to operate the reactor, or the Comission has permanently revoked such authority, the licensee is not subject to the annual fee under this part for that power reactor. Such reactors no longer benefit from the regulatory services that are i 1

the basis for the annual fee. Plants within this latter category, such as Dresden 1, Humboldt Bay, Peach Bottom 1, and Indian Point I will not be charged fees under this part (though they remain subject to any applicable fees pursuant to Part 170 of this chapter).

l

O O The annual fee is calculated as follows:

$405 million (NRC FY 87 budget) x .33 = $133 million (rounded down to the nearestmillion)

$133 million minus $37 million (est. fees Part 170, FY 87) = $96 million

$96 million divided by 101 licensed reactors = $950 thousand per license (roundeddowntothenearestthousand).

t Section 171.17 -- Proration.

l I

) .Section 171.17 in the proposed rule addressed the annual fee and its calculation i for major materials licenses. As they wili not be subject to fees under this part, that section is deleted and a new section 171.17 is added to the final rule for the purpose of addressing the issue of prorating fees for power reactors i

that are licensed to operate after the beginning of a fiscal year. No such

! provision was necessary in the proposed rule. As revised, applications for i

operating licenses under review will still be subject to fees chargeable under l

Part 170. It would not be fair to holders of new operating licenses to charge them the full annual fee in addition to fees which might have accrued under Part

]

170 during a fiscal year but prior to issuance of an operating license. The annual fee would be prorated by first dividing the annual fee by 365 and then multiplying the quotient by the number of oays re:naining in the fiscal yeer efter

, the operating license issuance date. For example, if an operiting license were issued on January 15 of fiscal year 1987, the annual fee for that fiscal year l

4

f

- P2 -

1

, l

O O would be $950,000 divided by 365, which is $2,603, and then multiplied by 258 (the number of days remaining in FY), which is $671,574 Section 171.19 -- Payment.

i i

This section, which was i 171.17 in the proposed rule, is revised in the final rule to allow the NRC to prescribe only those collection mechanisms that are acceptable to the U.S. Treasury Department. At this time, such mechanisms include checks, drafts, money orders, or the Electronic Funds Transfer System.

This section also has been revised in this final rule to provide for payment in quarterly installments of the Part 171 fee rather than payment in a single lump sum as proposed.

Section 171.21 -- Refunds.

Section 171.21, in the proposed rule was Enforcement and is renumbered i 171.23 in the final rule. This new section 171.21 is added to address the contingency that by the end of a given fiscal year, the aggregate of collections under Parts " ,

170 and 171 might exceed the statutory limit on collections of 33 percent of the i NRC budget. For example, several plants could be licensed to operate during the fiscal year and thereby pay a prorata share of the annual fee, or the number of amendments, inspections, or other activities subject to fees under Part 170 could be greater than estimated at the beginning of the fiscal year.

O O The purpose of the annual fee pursuant to Part 171 is to collect that portion of costs to the agency of providing regulatory services to power reactors, but with a ceiling on those collections equal to the difference between collections under Part 170 and 33 percent of the NRC budget. Accordingly, any collection of fees exceeding this ceiling will be refunded under this part. Refunds will be adjusted to allow for the fact that some licenses may only have been subject to a portion of the annual fee because the license to operate was issued during the fiscal year. However, it is anticipated that overpayments will arise under this provision rarely, if at all, and will probably not exceed $10,000 per license.

Because of the administrative costs associated with making a refund from the U.S.

Treasury, any overpayment of $10,000 or less will be credited against the annual fee for the following year.

Section 171.25 -- Collection, Interest, Penalties, and Administrative Costs.

This renumbered section, which was i 171.23 in the proposed rule, is modified slightly to reflect the requirement under 4 CFR Part 102 that, in addition to interest and penalties, administrative costs of collection also are recoverable by the NRC. The section is also modified in recognf tfon of the authority given under i 171.19 to pay the annual fee in quarterly installments. If the quarterly installment is not paid on time in accordance with the schedule provided in Interest, i 171.19, then the full annual fee becomes insnediately due and payable.

penalties (if applicabic), and administrative costs of collecting the fee will ba calculated from the date that the late quarterly installment was due.

i

.~ __. _ . . . . --

.O O Unchanged Sections.

l Sections 171.7, Interpretations,171.9, Comunications, and renumbered 171.23, Enforcement, are in this final rule as they were in the proposed rule.

10 CFR 51.22 -- Categorical Exclusion.

i The amendment to 10 CFR Part 51 to include Part 171 as a categorical exclusion j is unchanged.

i I

i 1

i i

i l

l

\

L

i L

i O O d

Commissioner Thomas M. Roberts abstained. The separate views of Commissioner 5

i.

Frederick M. Bernthal follow: .

t b

4 .

i4 i

4 1

! [

1 i

! t j -

4 I l i

i., ,.

t r

i I

I i

i

O O ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT: CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION The action required under this final rule is administrative and would not impact the environment. The Comission has determined pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(a) that this final rule would.be the type of action that is described in categorical exclusion 10CFR51.22(c)(1). Therefore, neither an environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment has been prepared for this proposed rule.  ;

l PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT STATEMENT This final rule.contains no information collection requirements and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). l REGULATORY ANALYSIS The NRC's predecessor, the Atomic Energy Comission, adopted its first license fee schedule in the fall of 1968, as codified in 10 CFR Part 170. The authority to collect fees was based on Title V of the Independent Offices Appropriation Act of 1952 (10AA) (31 U.S.C. 9701). That fee schedule covered power reactors, test l 1

and research reactors, fuel reprocessing plants, and materials licenses. It was revised and updated in 1978 and 1984 ,

4

O O The license fees were designed to recover a part of the costs of services attributable to identifiable recipients. Only those costs that were associated with the review of a license application and related to a specific identifiable beneficiary were used in the cost base for the establishment of the fee schedule.

Certain costs under the Commission's 1984 revised fee schedule in 10 CFR Part 170 (49 FR 21293) continued to be excluded from fees. Some of the costs that were excluded from the fee base were those associated with (1) research, (2) generic licensing activities, (3) standards and code development, (4) contested hearings, (5) the Office of International and State programs, (6) the Office of Inspector. and Auditor, (7) the Office of Congressional Affairs, and (8) the -

Office of'Public Affairs.

Section 7601 of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 requires the NRC to establish by rule an annual charge for its licensees that, when added to other amounts collected, is estimated to be equal to 33 percent of the estimated costs incurred by the Commission. This section authorizes NRC to expand its fee base to recover costs previously excluded, such as research and generic licensing activities. This final rule reflects NRC's interpretation of the intent of Section 7601.

1 i

l

O O REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY CERTIFICATION This rule is not a major rule for the purpose of Executive Order 12291 of February 17, 1981. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 605(b), and NRC Size Standards (50 FR 50241, December 20,1985),the Commission hereby certifies that this final rule does not have a significant impact on small business entities. This rule affects only nuclear power plants licensed to operate. The companies that own these companies do not fall within the scope of the definition'of "small entities" set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

LIST OF SUBJECTS IN 10 CFR PART 171 Annual charges, Power plants and reactors, Penalty.

For the reasons set out in the preamble, and under the authority of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, and 5 U.S.C. 553, the NRC is adopting a new 10 CFR Part 171.

Part 171 - Annual Fee for Power Reactor Operating Licenses Sec. 171.1 Purpose.

171.3 Scope.

1 171.5 Definitions, l

171.7 Interpretations.

O O 171.9 Comunications.

171.11 Exemption.

171.13 Notice.

171.15 Annual Fee: Power Reactor Operating Licenses.

171.17 Proration.

171.19 Payment.

171.21 Refunds.

171.23 Enforcement.

171.25 Collection, Interest, Penalties, and Administrative Costs.

Authority: Sec. 7601, Pub. L.99-272, 100 Stat. 146; sec. 301, Pub. L.92-314, 86 Stat. 222, (42 U.S.C. 2201(w)); sec. 201, 82 Stat. 1242, as amended (42 U.S.C.

5841).

9 171.1 Purpose.

The regulations in this part set out the annual fee charged to persons licensed by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission to operate a power reactor l as defined in this part.

O O 6 171.3 Scope.

l The regulations in this part apply to any person holding an operating license for a power reactor as defined in this Part.

I 171.5 Definitions-

" Budget" means the funds appropriated by Congress for the NRC for each fiscal.

year, and if that appropriation is not passed on or before September 1 for that fiscal year, the funds most recently appropriated by Congress for the most recent fiscal year.

' "Comission" means the United States Nuclear Regulatory Comission or its duly authorized representatives.

4

" Federal fiscal year" means a year that begins on October 1 of each calendar year and ends on September 30 of the following calendar year. Federal fiscal years f

are identified by the year in which they end (e.g., fiscal year 1987 begins in 1986 and ends in 1987).

" Operating license" means having a license issued pursuant to i 50.57 of this chapter. It does not include licenses that only authorize possession of special 1

nuclear material after the Comission has received a request from the licensee to amend its license to permanently withdraw its authority to operate or the Comission has permanently revoked such authority.

l

.O O

" Power reactor" means a nuclear reactor designed to produce electrical or heat energy and licensed by the Comission under the authority of section 103 or subsection 104b of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and pursuant to the j provisions of f 50.21(b) or i 50.22 of this chapter.

" Nuclear reactor" means an apparatus, other than an atomic weapon, used to sustain fission in a self-supporting chain reaction.

" Person"means(1)anyindividual, corporation, partnership, firm, association, trust, estate, giublic or private institution, group, Government agency other thsn the Comission; any state or any political subdivision of, or any political entity within, a state; any foreign Government or nation or any political subdivision of any such government or nation; or other entity; and (2) any legal successor, representative, agent, or agency of the foregoing.

6 171.7 Interpretations.

Except as specifically authorized by the Comission in writing, no interpretation of the regulations in this part by an officer or employee of the Comission,  ;

other than a written interpretation by the General Counsel, will be recognized as l l

i binding on the Comission.

6 171.9 Comunications.

All cenrunications regarding the regulations in this part should be addressed to the Executive Director of Operations, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission, Washington, D.C., 20555. Comunications may be delivered in person to the 4 Comission's offices at 1717 H Street NW., Washington, D.C.

_ _ .-. ._ _ _ . _ _ _ ~ _ . --

O O i 171.11 Exemption.

The Comission may, upon application, grant an exemption, in part, from the P annual fee required pursuant to this part. An exemption under this provision

may be granted by the Comission taking into consideration the following factors

(a) Age of the reactor; (b) Size of the react,or; (c) Number,of' customers in rate base; (d); Net increase in KWh cost for each customer directly related to the annual fee assessed under this part; and 4

(e) Any other relevant matter which the licensee believes justifies the reduction of the annual fee.

i 171.13 Notice.

I i

The first installment of the annual fee for fiscal year 1987 will become due and payable 30 days after the effective date of this final rule. Thereafter, the annual fee, applicable to a power reactor with a license to operate and calculated in accordance with 9 171.15 of this part, will be published in the Federal 1

Register on or before September 1 each year. The fee will become due and payable to the NRC in accordance with i 171.19 of this part, except as provided in i 171.17

, of this part. If the annual fee is based on the amount appropriated by the Congress i

for the prior fiscal year and Congress, during the fiscal year, enacts an appro-priation different from that used in setting the fee, the annual fee will be l

revised. to reflect the actual amount appropriated by Etngress for the fiscal l

year. Notice of this revision will be published in the Federal Register.

1 L.. . _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ _ _ . . . _ _ . . . _ . _ . _ . . . _ _ . . _ . . _ . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _

O O 6 171.15 Annual Fee: Power Reactor Operating Licenses.

(a) Each person licensed to operate a power reactor shall pay an annual fee for each power reactor unit for 'which the person holds an operating license at any time during the Federal Fiscal Year (FY) in which the fee is due.

(b) The basis for the annual fee shall be the sum of NRC costs budgeted for each FY for (1) research activities directly related to the regulation of power reactors,(2)powerreactorregulation(exceptlicensingar.dinspectionactivi-ties, and Part 55 operator licensing and instructor certification), and (3) safeguards activities for power reactors (other than those activities directly associatedwithplant-specificlicensingandamendments).

(c) If the basis for the annual fee is greater than 33 percent of the NRC budget less the total estimated fees chargeable under Part 170 of this chapter, then the maximum annual fee for each nuclear power reactor that is licensed to operate shall be calculated as follows: ,

(NRC FY Budget x .33) minus Est. Fees Part 170 = Fee per License No. of Operating Licenses for Power Reactors (d) If the basis for the annual fee is less than the total NRC budgeted costs times 33 percent minus the estimated fees payable under Part 170, then the annual fee shall be calculated as follows:

I

o o l I

I Basis for Annual Fee - Fee per License No. of Operating Licenses for Power Reactors ]

(e) The annual fee for each power reactor licensed to operate as of October 1, 1986, is $950,000. Thereafter, annual fees will be assessed in accordance with 5 171.13.

6 171.17 Proration.

The annua.1 fee for a power reactor granted its license to operate after October 1 of a FY shall be prorated on the basis of the number of days remaining in that FY. Thereafter, the full fee would be due and payable each subsequent FY.

Licenses revoked, suspended, or for which the licensee has requested amendment to permanently withdraw operating authority during the FY will not result in any refund of the annual fee or any portion thereof.

9 171.19 Payment.

Fee payments may be made in any manner allowed under U.S. Department of Treasury regulations and described in the Federal Register notice published pursuant to i 171.13 of this part. The annual fee shall be paid in quarterly installments of 25 percent. A quarterly installment is due on October 1, January 1, April 1, and July 1 of each year.

O O i

6 171.21 Refunds.

If at the end of an FY, the aggregrate of collections under 10 CFR Part 170 and this part exceeds 33 percent of the NRC budget, the overpaywent will be refunded on a prorata basis to those licensees who have paid fees under this part, but with an appropriate adjustment for any reduced payments pursuant to 6 171.17 of this part. Any overpaywent of $10,000 or less (per license) will be credited against the annual fee for the following FY.

6 171.23 ~ Enforcement.

If any person required to pay the annual fee fails to pay when the fee is due, the Commission may refuse to process any application submitted by or on behalf of the person with respect to any license issued to the person and may suspend or revoke any licenses held by the person.

6 171.25 Collection, Interest, Penalties, and Administrative Costs.

The annual fee will be collected pursuant to the procedures of 10 CFR Part 15.

Interest, penalties, and administrative costs for late payments will be assessed in accordance with 10 CFR Part 15 of this chapter, 4 CFR Part 102, and other relevant regulations of the United States Govornment, as appropriate. In the event a quarterly installment is not made by the appropriate due date specified in 9 171.19, the full fee becomes due and payable, with interest, penalties, ard administrative costs of collection calculated from the date that quarterly installment was due.

i

O O 1 4

PART 51 -- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION REGULATIONS FOR DOMESTIC LICENSING AND RELATED REGULATORY FUNCTIONS

2. The authority citation for Part 51 continues to read as follows:

AUTHORITY: Sec.161, 68 Stat. 948, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2201); secs. 201, 202, as amended, 88 Stat.1242, as amended, 1244 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842).

Subpart A also issued under National Environmental Protection Act of 1969, secs. 102, 104,e105, 83 Stat. 853-854, asamended(42U.S.C.4332,4334,4335);

and Pub..L.95-604, Title II, 92 Stat. 3033-3041. Section 51.22 also issued 1

j under sec. 274, 73 Stat. 688, as amended by 92 Stat. 3036-3038 (42 U.S.C. 2021).

i

3. In 9 51.22, the introductory text of paragraph (c) is republished and a reference to Part 171 is added to paragraph (c)(1), which is revised to read as follows

l 9 51.22 Criterion for and identification of licensing and regulatory actions eligible for categorical exclusion.

(c) The following categories of actions are categorical exclusions:

l 1 l 4

i I

L

---,w- n - - - - ,- r,- ,~., -,,--.----n---,---,xn- en, --, . - -- - - -n- , w>- w

1 O O l

(1) Amendments to Parts 0, 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 19, 21, 25, i 55, 75, 95,110,140,150,170, or 171 of this chapter, and actions on petitions for rulemaking relating to these amendments.

i Dated at Washington, D.C., this day of September 1986.

For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

i Samuel J. Chilk, Secretary of the Comission.

'[

f l

.- . - - - . m.. ___ , . , , , _ , . . . _ , , - . . _ . _ _ ,-..,,-,_.._--._,__,,,% -

--+m

O O Annual Fee For Licensed Operating Reactors The annual fee (10 CFR 171.15(e)) for each nuclear power reactor licensed to operate is $950,000.

The annual fee is calculated as follows:

$405 million NRC FY 1987 President's Budget (NUREG-1100 Vol. 2) x33% Percent of FY 1987 budget recovery required (P.L.

i 99-272)

$133 million Amount of FY 1987 recovery rounded down to nearest million Less (37)million Estimated FY 1987 collections (10 CFR 170) ,

$96 million Estimated FY 1987 collections (10 CFR 171)

Divided by 101 licensed reactors Equals $950,000 Annual fee per licensed reactor (rounded down to nearestthousand) i i

(

/3-1 I

j

l l

l n

v O. \

l l FISCAL YEAR 1987 PROJECTIONS OF NRC COSTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR REGULATORY GENERIC PROGRAMS (Dollarsinthousands) l l

l Costs for l

Programs Regulatory Services t

R e s e a rc h . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 74,356 Safeguards.......................................... 2,326 i Reactor regulation.................................. 24,346 Inspection and enforcement ......................... 15,482 i Analysis and evaluation of operational data......... 7,720 Total..................................... ,$124.230 De

)

Because the costs listed above apply to all power reactors, the costs have been divided equally for purposes of calculating the annual fee. This approach is consistent with the Congressional directive that all fees be reasonably related to the cost of providing services.

5. Fines, Penalties, Interest, and Reimbursements l

l Comment: Comenters said that fines, interest, penalties, and reimbursements j 1

l should be included in the cost basis as collections under other laws.

l l

A

[/

'I l

1 August 14, 1986 ~

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPMISSION i FUNDS RELATED TO OPERATING REACTORS ud (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)

FY 1987 Estimates Ccntract Staff FTE's M Dollars Costs 2./ TOTAL Nuclear Reactor Regulation Program Q 1.

Operating Reactors: 33 $1.110 $ 2,500 $ 3,610 1

- Safety Assessment 6,893 6,893

- Project Management 91 4 303 303

- Safeguards Coordination 76 76

- Technical Assistance Project Management  !

4 303 301

- Technical Support to Others Operator Licensing: 11 180 833 1,013 i

- Generic Activities 7 530 530

~

- Regional Oversight 76 76

- Technical Assistance Project Management  !

Safety Technology: 822 606 1,428

- Unresolved Safety Issues 8 25 665 1,894 2,559

- Generic Issues n 32 2,243 2,424 4,667 U - Regulatory Requirements 530 530 7

- Research and Standards Coordination 17 843 1,288 2,131 4

- Human factors Program Issues 227 227

- Technical Assistance Project Management 3 SUSTOTAL W T,~SIJ 18,483 24,346

2. Inspection and Enforcement Program Reactor Operations: $ 1,383 $ 1,533

- Program Development and Appraisal' 20 $ 150 484 7 484

- Assessment of Regional Implementation Jr ** : f /' T 3 3 .< , 4

~ FY 1987 Estimatss Contract Staff FTE's Oollars Costs TOTAL 7

% "b I

Vendor and Quality Assurance: $2,005 2,865

- Vendor Progra 1 29 $ 860 Enforcement. Technical Support and Incident Response: 120 830 950 12

_ Laboratory and Technical Support 10 350 691 1,041

- Events Evaluarton 7 75 484 559

- Generic Comunun1 cations 2,010 1,659 3,669

- Incident Response Program 24 3,690 691 4,381 O - WRC Operations Center 10

$8,227 $15,482 119 $7,255 SU8 TOTAL

! 3. Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards $1,486 $ 2,326 Power Reactor safeguards (partJ 22 $ 840

4. Nuclear Regulatory Research Program

$29,170 $2,%4 $32,134 37 Reactor Engineering 3,009 240 3,249 3

Thermal Hydraulic Transients i

16,820 1,362 18,182 17 Accident Evaluation 3,204 14,754 40 >>.550 O R-ctor operations and Risu .

W ste Management, Earth Sciences and 4,915 1,122 6,037 14

Health

$65,464 $8,892 $74,356 SU8 TOTAL 111

5. Office for Analysis and Evaluation $ 4,590 $3,130 $ 7,720 44 of Operational Data

$ 84,012 $ 40,218($124.2309 TOTAL 540 SOURCE:

FY 1987 President's Budget (NOREG-1100, Vol. 2), Data Base Detail, and memos from RES, IE and NRR, and back-up detail from NMSS.

. ki FOOTNOTES FTE's  !

The loading factors 1/ The FTE's shown in the Data Base Detail for each Planned Accomplishment are dir only. The FTE's have been loaded with variable and fixed overhead FTE's.

are computed as follows: AEOD NMSS RES NRR IE 17 TOTAL 162 46 80 41 0FFICE Variable Overhead (0/H) FTE's 194 75 132 58 Fixed Overhead (0/N) FTE's 2T2 3!T6 T2T SU8 TOTAL 239 122 471 779 760 T85 Direct FTE's TOTAL FTE's 383 ETI!i 50.6% 47.5%

45.0% 45.7%

0/H as a percent of direct O

J .,.

4 2/ Staff costs were calculated by multiplying the FTE's by following labor rates:

NMSS RES AE00 NRR IE

$17,370K $10,210K See

$38,340K $55,570K 3,690 Below Salaries and Benefits 11,950 17,470 6.220 Administrative Support 1,450_ 5,250 730 520 Travel

$51,740K $78,470K $24,320K $14,420K TOTAL 1,135 360 180 603 FTE's $75,750 $69,136 $67,555 $80.111 Rate per FTE

$17,250 PTS Salaries and Benefits 5,720 Administrative Support Total $22,970 330 FTE's $69,606 Rate per FTE

44 The FTE's for AE00 are:

O '44 x $69,606 ,

$3,060K 70 l

AEOD Travel

$3,130K Total r i

^

,.:n = = :

0 O 's FISCAL YEAR 1987 PROJECTIONS OF NRC COSTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR REGUL'ATORY GENERIC PROGRAMS (Dollars in thousands)

Costs for Programs Regulatory Services Research............................................ $ 74,356 S a'fe g u a r d s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,326

_ a rr.cc or Arucuo ottAcro4 RHvL ATr%

Reactor regul at1 on(. . . . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . :24,346 3 s

Inspection and enforcement ......................... 15,482 Analysis and evaluation of operational data......... 7,720 Total..................................... $124,230 Because the costs listed above apply to all power reactors, the costs have been divided equally for purposes of calculating the annual fee. This approach is censistent with the Congressional directive that all fees be reasonably related to the cost of providing services.

l

5. Fines, Penalties, Interest, and Reimbursements Coment: Commenters said that fines, interest, penalties, and reimbursements should be included in the cost basis as collections under other laws.

/c-2 August 14, 1986

" U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FUNDS RELATED TO OPERATING REACTORS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) u FY 1987 Estimates contract Staff FTE's M Dollars Costs 2./ TOTAL

1. Nuclear Reactor Regulation Program Operating Reactors: 33 51.110 $ 2,500 $ 3,610

- Safety Assessment 6,893 6,893 91

- Project Management 4 303 303

- Safeguards Coordination 1 76 76

- Technical Assistance Project Management 303 303 4

- Technical Support to Others Operator Licensing: 180 833 1,013 Il

- Generic Activities 7 530 530

- Regional Oversight 1 76 76

- Technical Assistance Project Management Safety Technology: 822 606 1,428 8

- Unresolved Safety Issues 665 1,894 2,559 25

- Generic Issues 2,243 2,424 4,667 32

- Regulatory Requirements 530 530 (O - Research and Standards Coordination 17 7

843 1,288 2,131

- Human factors Program Issues 227  ; 227 3

- Technical Assistance Project Management 7(4 F,T6J 18,483 s YC5E SUBTOTAL

2. Inspection and Enforcement Program Reactor Operations: 20 $ 150 $ 1,383 $ 1,533

- Program Development and Appraisal. 7 484 484 ,

- Assessment of Regional Implementation

. _ .  ?????

, FY 1987 Estimates Contract Staff

[*

Dollars _ Costs TOTAL g FTE's Ol" i

$2,005 2,865 Vendor and Quality Assurance: 29 $ 860 1

- Vendor Program Enforcement. Technical Support and Incident Response: 830 950 12 120 1,041 691

_ Laboratory and Technical Support 10 350 484 559

- Events Evaluation 7 75 1,659 3,669

- Generic Communicatfons 24 2,010 4,381

- Incident Response Program 3,690 691 10

- MtC Operations Center l (Q SUBTOTAL

!!9 $7,255 $8,227 $15,482 Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards $1.486 $ 2,326

3. 22 $ 840 Power Reactor Safeguards (part)

4. Nuclear Regulatory Research Program

$2,964 $32,134 37 $29,170 I Reactor Engineering 240 3,249 3 3,009 Thermal Hydraulic Transients 1,362 18,182 17 16,820 Accident Evaluation 14,754 40 11,550 3.204 Reactor Operations and Risk Weste Management Earth Sciences and 1,122 6,037 4,915

_14 Health $8,892 $74,355 111 $65,464 SU8 TOTAL Office for Analysis and Evaluation 44 $ 4,590 $_3.130 $ 7,720 S.

l of Operational Data.

$ 40,218 $124,230 540 $ 84.012 TOTAL

)

SOURCE:

FY 1987 President's Budget (NUREG-1100, Vol. 2), Data 8ase Detail, and memos l from RES, IE and NRR, and back-up detail from IMSS.

^Q W

, s u

b FOOTNOTE _S Accomplishment are direct FTE's E's. The loading factors

' 1/only. The FTE's shown in the Data Base Detail for each Plan are computed as follows: RES AE00 IE NMSS NRR 17 TOTAL ,

162 46 0FFICE 80 75 41 194

' Variable Overhead (0/11) FTE's 132 E6 T7I Ed '

Fixed OverheadSU8 (0/H) FTE's Tf2 TOTAL 122 ,

779 239 471 T8D Direct FTE's TOTAL FTE's W3 @ 765 J 50.6% 47.5%

45.0% 45.7%

0/H as a percent of direct i

j

?

i i r 1

1 i

! 4 >

i a

• {+

I 2/ Staff costs were calculated by multiplying the FTE's by following RES _ AEDO labor rates:

l DE NNSS NRR See

$17.370K $10,210K

$38,340K $55,570K 3,690 Below Salaries and Benefits 11,950 17,470 6.220 730 520 Administrative Support 1,450 5,250

l Travel $24,320K $14,420K

$51,740K $78,470K TOTAL l (f ) 603 1,135 360

$67,555 180

$80,111 FTE's $75,750 $69,136

} Rate per FTE I *

$17,250 PTS Salaries and Benefits 5,720 l' ~~~ Administrative Support

$22,970 Tota) l 330 TTE's $69,606 Rate per FTE 44 4

The FTE's for AE00 are:

$3,060K 44 x $59,606 70

?

' AE00 Travel

$3,130K Tctal 4

+

4 i

a i

.b P MD*

• 4 N- V-

.i I

l 1

" N M 9 "4 N # @ E N S .- D - 5-- kh* l g i  ! = ' I - i f I ! ! j ii!.

i i %

. I mYi I 6 i i il' 1

l l - --- d l .%l l '

T.g -

2 I

a

_t e

i i i .

1 i.__.' ~

i I

r i i 3

,  ; *j j a e i i : ','t I__ i i e TI I.

i i i4

! ===

=

i i

, . i i i i i i i i i e i, ! 2- .

i - ! i i i i t- i i i iH- *

~+ ;

i .

, i 4

4. l  ;

l ,

.f -

l t-+-

i _._I il' 4 i t

!dl I I C

6 9 #

l 6

e i

- em ' mum I f I I l I l ! l J__

g-l l i 1 l ( l l 8-a.

I f l I '

Mh  ;

iM '

, F i I i ,  ! i j

, l

'- :-  ! i& ' '

, 1 i i i i i i ' I ' I i ' i i i 6 i .

~ ~w . -

1 { l

' t l *

, i l l l t 3 l l #I I l

4 % A8Th _ Q--- p _, A , vy Q p]- jE  ?

h

.c y Gy.pOti-

-CL_ _i_h .- 3[-t-**---.g__-]

s ' . r -- -

y-- - %Q , q

.- so I,

y. _~ .

% g

. g0 -+ 6 , 4 s

i e

~i i a

i

b. F --- i i , i 9 ,,,,j i I  ! ! l l l l g I E ~

f '

=q =: -u_. ft __4

4. i e _q v 4t-a E~ d i

er Cs .

Dt-N ~

2 s .

! 6e-U m ... ,

Ni "- I .I -  ; i [ 4 r _

? i . i , , i , i iii i e i ,

._ _ _ .:- e I l l  ! $  ! h S '

h h b

k

- . -w - ,

4q 4 ! j-l -

~

[ , .l ' '

! vi 4-- D l

" 7 ,

s w i , . , , i ,

e

, i , , .

_.. f f l 4 l l l l  ! l $

- f I l ! l l  !

t ,3 '

i -T g g*

, e ,. , . - ,

i

~,,,

r

! . ii, Ah

_: : + i- ,_

m i j i  ! l t-g '. g i { . i .

d*  ! 4 i l . ' I I i i i iiil i I ~

( _I  ! } g E -t I

k. j M

-c , 1 i

} t----

% *; _ i . _ ,

trfh $  ;

ki f- - ~

( -- ..

-i h..- s , , , , -, 1 , t

.,Ja_j g& i -

! i i -

! !yi -

- i

.i _L; ,

ii! i i a

,1 ng i i i t ,  ! ! !  ! ! i-  !-

h t

$_EI '

x  !.

'i s _

1 i

_ _ i i i

t i !

. I  ! e i 8

1 3

1 i I t i il ' i I j .

f I i

~ {m i i i i f ! i l l l I ! - - -

1 1 , 1 i i i -

m N Q  % 'Tb

,[

i R- G ' ' '

i V$N9 8v- i _ i , -.

i r

i ,'

, ' , 5 i  ! I i I i i i i I N .

, sl e

?

$g <} q d 'p s

] -

l

(<

[4 It < Iky 1y&v i

m c

I 1

e+

t x fi (3 s

a; k zk ,, '

hi D

a w

4 h .

l!. kh.hI md4~9 9 h+y~ a, 3 e b}-p!

!)\mi>)j' I '

it

• 1 N: j 0!IIl 4

g

.! h f g

$ Y Y: .

i b l  ! l l

! I f M l {l-- fl 1 i- i ._.s_

. l 1 ____m I l

' $5

"" [c h p &

UNITED STATES 4.g g :,#pn:o g

• NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

- = y,' I wAswowoTow, p.c. aosse

• • • • • J AUG 131986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Richard P. Shumway, Deputy Director Division of Budget and Analysis Office of Resource Management FROM: Jesse L. Funches, Director Planning and Program Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation SUBJECT! BREAK 0UT OF NRR COSTS FOR OPERATING REACTORS AS BASIS FOR 10 CFR PART 171 ON LICENSE FEES Per your req'uest, we have enclosed our estimate of the NRR resources that are i

j applica'b le to -operating reactors but not fee-recoverable under 10 CFR Part 170.

Note tha't the resources are unloaded and should have overhead added before the final total. If you have any further questions, please call Lars Solander on X24516.

f A -

sse L. Funckes, tirector Planning and Program Analysis Staff  ;

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  ;

l i l l

q

Enclosure:

As stated cc: J. Holloway, ADM I

l l

4 i

l

.$.-A .

.-2,.. .. .. w - . . ..

.g ,

.~~.

tD _ G)

X-l lI#i D

d -

E s 4 q g s l

85 333 2 ' 4:l gagegg. =_ *.g sh3- ,2.'

- e .

!!!i 3 .. . ,

l5 ' 2 3,5 22 . 2 i:  : 3 k e *ne _i a- m -- - -

$ a

. i i

is

, .i J 32 E I: 2 N t

I es e ,. , ,, , , .

,3 E & i = o n.

x

.lig Elg 3 ,iq '

i2 E 22 2 2 3 c g= *_:

gig i= 5- g -- - -

i .

~

sai -

. gl%: 22 .I E3 0 3 j

" m,, e n= q .. . .

_ = -

I  :

y In -I I;  ; y

. - a g2 ,A

'd -- "-

3 its . ~q g I 1, i

gl g g E

g. l l , ,

5 8

= -

I I

I e

- a a s

=

E s a -2 I' g

=a*s 3a

- -=-*in

! s=a

=

E

=

a

=,

I :z.

- u,"::=t:=t::=<:a t:

. [t -

a o

h L

k V,

% -< .441 ~~ ' '

, , p..,

.-..,,-...._-._,._,_.-,.___or-;~;

__--..-.__,____,,.,.,'__,_.-_,_.,_,,,,,.n_.,.,,,,.,,~,M**

M. '.

l v

1 O .

l l ..

%o t g .

g .

g  % 4. .. - .iv t *.:. -

Yu 64 s e,'Q. i"g

' i'itgs[g '

.!I_ [=j

_ !a-Jl

.,c . .. .. ..

. B.5 EGG ii a s = E"

= d id id id geg Em'l E!g . .. .. ..

ii

- -. .~ ..

1 g m gu a da da se guy 3 _a:

g mEE . .. .. .. s.

a

~

a' -

5

_ I., . .. .

t -

in a de se lug a is gag g,a .

3 3 .- m:

mga . .. .. ..

-l,I ,.,

s ==

s8 ga 8 jjlgm ie 4 -

d dd id id g=3 1

d 3 mg2 g . .. .. ..

gag

~

i i l . .~ .. ..

ii fu a 64 s" de gag Iul

=gg g* . g ..

,,3 g I 8 * *i -

.g l n I

i I

E , B 3 3 a zz ss sa M ss E as 3 as *h E E *

:a : as as  :

2 m a as a as a as lll l I a g as an as ass an ass il l,' g.1

.a -

L

?-

< .. k . . .

- - - - - - - - . - . . _ - - . _ , . - - , , , , . , . . . . , , , , _ ,.,,.-,p_ _,.,,,,7,,,.,_.w..,y,_,,.--,,,,+_-_,y .

g -

f :v O O I

g, e e e e s ..

• s= as- x.

as. sa ., =g

_ei . . . . . .. A g w_ w_ w_

N m3:2 -

,. , e e a a .= .

am i

nme -i xx y x

~~

k e

. - - . ~ .

. , a a a e a ..

o.

s'a'

,1 - x 3 er- e .

, 3 4t

_ Iy. a e, a e e a a .. n af 2 s~': J Igs -

l 1  : "le-! - - - -

as l,l

=I

. i su_ ". . . . . .

a a a . a ..

f.-

II a

a , . . . . . .. <

e 3

eg;; I I  !

l" e a w -

_. a  : . . .

. 8 = _=J

=

Esl.

B

Id = =aI-! .- -

es \9 1 i l [a t a .

=

3 I

a n 8

I m t

I i .!a y u a i a 5 sa m a j =n83a

. m 0a a

s

. t

-M 8 m m 8 m l.3 a 8 m

m ll i

l5E a E a* a

• a E a an a E a a a a a as c- r_ ll T+ : a .. -.N-

s o

. N i ..

% s  !

\

.i

\'

3 g

ed

)

a 'r e

W.

M <a A.!

\

na ,u s

,$a=!

25 ;EH

\

_s=. 'aC 5.* E* .* * **

1 na 2 -

E S =s

= 4d 44 4 4 44 I29

.c g.:g ku

g. 3

. . .. g y

3 8

gg g 9 4g 44 4 .: 44 \

~ 2 -JJ- '

• I J CE a

f g.

g.

8 "

a ~

E. 3 .. .. . ~ ..

gs88 sg as s a sa

{

s 2 3_. g g: *i.

.i I* j

=l2 n- g- - --

lII g 2 as_i ". ..

g= -

eg as s a sa e

d

!I=l eg2

.: g. g. . . ..

- g a I .. .. . . . -.

a < ~a .: a a -

so I:

!"ljd g-

a. a a s n -

1 -

a .l , s.

E e .

E g

g

. ... a... . .

y g -

g; E a '! I i E

,a, ga, I8=a a g , g s,z, m

a 3 =,=, g

= == = == = =<.

==

~! g a,,, a as =8 a 8a as I E-as it

'an \ -en-h n %[ ,,

. %?"

t,I,. 9m9- a 5

D

~ ~

_. -__,,__,_-._.s -.__.. -._..____,, .,_._-.,_. .,. __,._ _ ,_,.... .,_, , -_ _,,,_.

r o

ti.

O l 1

l l

. v *M :9 8' 9E - . --

ami R a l'. , -

_E== Ega ge ** -*

.. ses i

i ww

• a I. I 533E ~  !

• n -

.~

i 3

a ad

=ss .

g .

i I3 ! 4 3-!

me -- --

.= = =. -

4 4 4 3

t f -. *=

y y ss *R

. - -i .

-~

.ns e .

3 -aj i d

-1. C E xi .. .. ...

.3 3, E

3 I, E

E ll=, $ .

n-  ::

3

,3 35 = -~

=ns i e

. ER t

.=I

." !,=12 -- --

s,

.c e . .

Ei as Et g sw

~* S3 aa J I =gg -

i d J

s

~

J J

• g e. --

n gg g g d 4 4

' " 3 s

• M*S EE -~

"ma a I

i Iig~

a d

e s ** ** = I o

3 3 3 m

5*5 a a 53IE

= E  :

4 I

• w a . .

3 g

• M E = l I m i

U l - 88 ** a5

• a i l

== g -*

• yg  !

.. .. 113 I == = =

! a=a

=== 1 ., =n ann am=s... aa a E a a l,.

4

-) . 7

.,. .u.*~*

. s-

. r O O e- -

g, a a a a a ~

IE~

ag! Ra'i e ,,

g .!

_s=. m e. 3- . - - -

• jggI ma_

~

- 35 an a a a a

~

e E z ,1

' e ,,

,I -ie . g . . . . .

gy AA

~ .

' g_ " " a .

e i

i

, a, n i i e__ s 3- mEa gi1 -g. . . . .

s 3 gg..

I I in a a~ a

. ~

e 8 i 3

a5_5 ) ag g! 8 2

. I~~n i se

. ,lII g . .

gg

-gg a =

E= -

a a .

a .

a a ~

a l =, . e- e ==

d 4,

id a - *-

ss 1 . -

l 1

de e=a -

e e

a 'ng IE 1 I Ia I-! .-

=I2laI in I

g .

I I i. i a 1

- m 1 E .

5 e =

a.

e a

i s.

3 m 8a2g*

I: =

,a

.=

a a== ==a=

=

-t

=

ll c..

• e.im. ';&k ' % ' . s. .. .a. .

__._.-____..=,_____.__. _ , _ _ , , _ ._ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ . _ _ - _ _ . - .

* {!

4. y u y I g l i

^ a.

' 58:

agg Ean i . n " .

N 8:~

• g l, s 3 s a t. E 3 3 E R 4

I!!$ .

' ' N g - .

k w E $

3

• !d i E E E I

.r -

N 3

. k E E 5 5 O

)E.im 3 i! .

1*!E i

E 5

- S E

- E

! I

[E W 2 g 2 2  : 5 2 3:m E lI li j Ele]

.a agg ,

E

4. E a

8 f II .

li 1 -

's 3

. a

j. II= ~ 2 d  :

2 g

• in]  :

a ~n

s- E

< a

.= enn en som en

• N '

E:

Ele]

l "

3 E *,!

1 y2 s' .

s aIaa5sa i 1 -

'g  %-

I a

E I I u I I

<af ' I I

E

-a .a a a

- . E

- ,a.! ,a=- 3

- ,a -i a  ! ,n ,

55E a E a E a E*,

I ,%

E a s

E\ ah a ' ah a a Je D l'

- - - - - - ~ ' ' - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~N?~ ~ ~ ~

.: o a

i e; s.

~ s l nafs

• e - i = x- i - = e 5,

==a egJe s

_as. -

g . - -

Em iss-

===I ed s a

m U 2 U U E 2 ts

!=1  %

!2 .

a a

as 4

= -

s 3 a s s s_== k u

,i - a ,.,n,

,3 :g g -

g,- . . . -

,, R

, 3 -

~~

5-I 1 . .

. gs a e a a e

3 aI a

. Iau

_sI

-- i an zI* j 7 c'12 . -

S-III 8

. 55 j i=[I # Y j

2 3 3 2 2 ==

. sl,= --

d

. s j

(2 u gE e

E!

l im 3 I'

U E .I xx E-]l-ll2*3 cle! a e

a l

'- s g

ss -

l g 3 s

E

~!

-a ll - .l

,a g ,y- a l-a l!

g e a 1

g , j , , =g , a 8 8 8

• m m m z E a a I8\A 2 8 2 A

E A A

E a 2 A

'\ aAb2 E a ll 33 L .- 1 p

lT' y w_

T;.

4. -__

} .-

. a. - u - - - - - - - - - --

-..-_..a , e. - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - -

e-

c -

9 .

o M 2 $' $ $

l'. aI 1 i ,5=a- .=.2 - - . . .

I$$$ .

l

=  : 2 2 s

=.e . . . . .

.1 1 cle

, a -

I E i i s s  : 2 3 1

gI I In.d

!*1]

. . g a - -

=

Eli E:

2 2 2 2 2 f gge 3

cge . . . . .

3 1

• g 3

g ir 3l2 3 3

=l2 -

a I-s 1 Ii!I I

f

• 8 8 8 8 I a a a

y a a s j a a s a =E = =R = .R I ,a E a a a a

a d-1 7?

{. . . _ - . _ , . .. - - .

. g - ----

a ~

- _ ,,,_ ._,m FIS' CAL YEAR 1987 PROJECTIONS OF NRC COSTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR REGUL'ATORY GENERIC PROGRAMS (Dollars in thousands)

Costs for Programs Regulatory Services

~

Research............................................ $ 74,356 Safeguards.......................................... 2,326 Reactor regulation.................................. 24,346

,, Inspection and enforcement .d.*S .*.F.l".'fC.".i 15,482a Analysis and evaluation of operational data......... 7,720 Total..................................... $124,230 Because the costs listed above apply to all power reactors, the costs have been divided equally for purposes of calculating the annual fee. This approach is consistent with the Congressional directive that all fees be reasonably related to the cost of providing services.

5. Fines, Penalties, Interest, and Reimbursements Coment: Comenters said that fines, interest, penalties, and reimbursements should be included in the cost basis as collections under other laws.

d-3_

l

.. August to, noo

• , U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY C0m !SSION FUNDS RELATED TO OPERATING REACTORS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANOS)

FY 1987 Estimates _

7 v1 4 0 Contract Staff Dollars _ Costs 2/ TOTAL FTE's M auci ar Reactor aeouietioa erooram tO 1. Operating Reactors: 33 $1,110 $ 2,500 6,893

$ 3,610 6,893

- Safety Assessment 91 303 303

- Project knagement 4 76 76

- Safeguards Coordination 1 303 303

- Technical Assistance Project Management 4

- Technical Support to Others 833 1,013 Operator Licensing: 11 160 .

530 530

- Generic Activities 7 76 76

- Regional Oversight 1

- Technical Assistance Project N nagement 606 1,428 Safety Technology: 8 822 2,559 665 1,894

- Unresolved Safety Issues 25 2,424 4,667

- Generic Issues 32 2,243 Q

y

- Regulatory Requirements 7 843 530 1.288 530 2,131

- Research and Standards Coordination 17 227 227

- Human factors Program Issues 3 18,483 24,346

- Technical Assistance Project k nagement SU8 TOTAL W T,T6"J

2. Insaection and Enforcement: Program-

$ 1,383 $ 1,533 Reactor Operations: 20 $ 150 484 484

- Program Development and Appraisal.. 7

- Assessment of Regional laplementation

.h ..*:f/c 2 L g ,4 O

• FY 1987 Estimatas

. Centract Staft 0011ars Costs TOTAL FTE's Vendor and Quality Assurance: $2,005 2,865

- Vendor Program 29 $ 860 7

OO Enforcement. Technical Support and Incident Response: 120 830 950 Laboratory and Technical Support 12 350 691 1,041 10

! Events Evaluation 7 75 484 559

- Generic Communications 2,010 1,659 3,669

- Incident Response Program 24 3,690 691 4,381 10

- NRc Operations center CO 119 $7,255 $8,227 l$15,482.e 508 TOTAL

3. Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards $1,486 $ 2.326 Power Reactor Safeguards (part) 22 $ 840

4. Nuclear Regulatory Research Program

$29,170 $2,964 $32,134 Reactor Engineering 37 3,009 240 3,249 Thermal Hydraulic Transients 3 16,820 1,362 18,182 17 Accident Evaluation 4o 22 sso 3 2o4 14 754 a**ctar operatiaas and aisk CO Waste Mana9ement, Earth Sciences and 1,122 6,037 14 4,915 Health .

$65,464 $8,892 $74,356 SU8 TOTAL 111

5. Office for Analysis and Evaluation $ 4,590 $3,130 $ 7,720 of Operational Data 44 540 $ 84,0l?, $ 40,218 $124,230 ,

TOTAL 50teCE: FY 1987 President's Budget (NUREG-Il00, Vol. 2), Data Base Detail, and memos from RES, IE and NRR, and back-up detafi from NMSS.

N - - -- . -

1 -

FOOTNOTES direct FTE's m,S The loading factors s) 1/ The FTE's shown in the Data Base Detail for each Planned Accomplishment are only. The FTE's have been loaded with variable and fixed overhead FTE's are computed as follows: RES AE00 IE NMSS NRR 17 TOTAL 46 O Variable Overhead (0/H) FTE's 80 132 N

162 194 75 T2T 41 Eg 0FFICE Fixed OverheadSUBTOTAL (0/H) FTE's YT2 239 I?2 779 471 G E E Direct FTE's TOTAL FTE's E

50.6% 47.5%

45.0% 45.7%

0/H as a percent of direct O

ma -

I 2/ Staff costs were calculated by multiplying the FTE's by following laborAEOD rates: ml NMSS _ RES IE NRR See

$b

$38,340K $55,570K $17,370K $10,210K 3,690 Below Salaries and Benefits 11,950 17,470 6.220 Aministrative Support 1,450 5,250 730 520 Travel

$51,740K $78,470K $24,320K $14.420K TOTAL 1,135 360 180 603 $80,111 FTE's $75,750 $69,136 $67,555 Rate per FTE

$17,250 PTS Salaries and Benefits 5,720 Administrative Support Total $22,970 330 FTE's $69,606 Rate per FTE 44 The FTE's for AE00 are:

44 x $69,606 $3,060K L 70 AE00 Travel

$3,130K Total

Offacs ef f.ncftcrv- An o t=,a nscc nee ~ T" A Q l ?_' , ^=-- "/zj i Slyfe} <f* A SA 1 [t c{. *jb.,ss-c.,5 0 ,m

_.___m _. .

, , .. m _ , . . . , _ . , , . . _ = , - - - -

'd84r FTEk / 4

,k h,,, ,g l r n- - '[- ' g 4- -v-+----

'}

-- 9-' -r

, .T-~"'- "T' - * -

I 4* N IW M 3 .I ,j f

!sr

n.un wa.,~. . An~n 4; yshn a.  ; m' .m 7en hsu  :

-l o'

_ . . Au...Ja , - r~,t.-.-$ iV ,

!? i # m,x l i av ll !i L l l ' ' Wrv i 3

^

-i-

@ li-T-

llIi fl -

!!!l l'bY if" i

N'f -

I

=

i' :!  !

,{_ . ve* < . a v.-4.. h y

. ru~ .

H. !

1

.j !! li,T, -'l-} t, i [4

%po.l i c

j j;ll  ! j i 7

r.

. prm.s.9l 1m u..  ! ,2n r l ,

i i i i

, v h_ ._7, C.or.n.Mnuaa. s.n.ar m i t . _ _ _  ;

l $ l ,o

\

• _ Q l df<wr <%~ . _ _  !'.l ,f I I! ( ii pc gz, w vy

>; ..g  % .r. c~r g a p,p

u. ,.

i .

q _ _ ,  %,.,-,,.,_ . p L . ,y w ,A . _

'j _y. _ T2-*% C .... cati =4. __ _

MT. . kI_ c1,.3f.

f'. a,b 7f j _ _

84 un in%P e e;c c.- h... , -

47%Ad.d/ - . .

l TE_E'I'MT_s~ET Ydi ~~11? iOb-l I! b >E' PIII Ib U  !

L

'l ,

12_ ,u, u,-w 1 w t j wa wp g,s -  ;

j!

~

1! .._ _ .___ _ - _ _ _ ... .  ! l i i  : _

h__b_. _ _ _ ._ .

}_

! i! it  ; T TTTF-

~ ~

T-dTT -

lii i! b .!

,I

g. _ _._ w ea. a g m _ t

}

,4 i

'y "7de ., 1,/$,.

. [. 1

' I

[ l  !

'!  ! 24 j

, l 7

_r _ _._ _. _

1,_ _ _.

i.y._ l!il .

! I I

i i n

2.

j _ ,l _ . _ __ . .

! ll

!, ,l l l

,i

$, i i 18 3

.I

{f

-l "

l , . I i I  !! I. i

=

g, -

_ _ _ y_ _ _ f m . _

a gu .= _,

j g __ _ g ll Q,4 _ _ . _

g ;o

.[ t . . . .. ... . . _ . . . . . _ .

t ,7 5

E1 in :s 33 25

-f8 aR E, 5 -

Ega d .. . . ..

g g.

!!!i -- .. . . ..

Y YM S O S &&

E

=12 ..

3

! !al 3 =ma .. 3 a  !

s! I du Eh EU U 3 UU h"I 3 !~

gll i ,2 =l] e 3 3 sai =.

HE

s :s s  : ss

, al=

-3 a a 3 nd .a n- I s-s 5 3 ..

I .. . . ..

Yb O O NO I 3 I s j

d

=

.o g 7, . g-g.

g s - E $

u

- I.t 1 1

.g _ _- I..I.l.l~:~:

g__g_g_g

\

en : en : = = n : ==

gI 2 as 2 as 3 a E a t as a_8 I EE RA as a a as l

l 1

. . . ... , ~ .

f 1-3 5 .-

.;$ su sa "d

de I

-=4 1

!u'd

_.s=~ -

. 2 A E5 sa5~E E Unn di da

!)

ele .. .. ..

33 ..

En can ds

} !al "d l

3=p 3

=

. q .. .. ..

d ..

gI 3!u] can dd di 1l;geje g

sta.

8: (gu

'*' can I da .. .

en

, a s E l

d g =g]e .. ..

,- .- 3,

, l .. ..

3 g g 3 .. .-

d~ "

'" "' sus l de

, .. aR .~

"A 9]

g

= d -- --

3s3 g -- --

l .I

=

8 II .

I  !

y g E '

Q

. ,a

g. ss gg g2 I

~~

g -- -- a a g ~~ g. ~~

= ,= ,= == ,t, e lll ! n 88

= :,en, =: ,, tz l an as saa a f na as

n... ... . ..'. .

L 6

l i .

!3

• g, 23" 2 23 3 3

~

s*

• 8 Ea) E

=- -d a f. I.

E-8

~~

liii

, sg ss  :  ; 3 E:]

Id gg - g- -

a

.r .- a 3i 23 3 2 2 j ,a=i]

1:

Ed ga q-

- 3 -

=

I! i 5 !g.1 si  :

y g

23 3 2 3

! g"l1 g g ! 2 23 e.

• (- -

a

! . i l-la h si : ij33 s  ; .

" JI I,]

) i $d 3 31 3 - l E.-

a n-i g..mg,

~

3-l I lssaslals 8

E]I 3 a l 3 g I egd W. 25 3 ""

E*

N 4-3 R l*y l."i I.l.

$ I 8 1 n.

i Y 3 ~~ 5 ~ g nn y n y n y n I  : == = = = ne : e = m = e a as 8 a m ,, = , m , = ,

RA A 22 A a 2

.b _

. . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . .

l O!

F5 t

. _2:. ~t

1 .

1 - ,

j, ,s= "i "i "* ans d "$.

a 2 -

. s. =,E] e .. .. --

sua s-

<<< a lIII

.~ .. . ..

e as si as agg da t=l; 3 ,- ~4 .

s

= g= av sg as ass na lis ,

3 =n]e .. ..

aas s

3 lI

? d av sg as ass na i=

II j=j]

s

!~=

e .. ..

3 l=ui

, ,je de se as egg ..

na d

Eg; .. .. .

3,g g.

, a ,. -

3 .. . ..- .. I g dd d3 dd ogg Ad {

=le

.I 3

a nl

""'e 9 g.

g g g

=

l l I 8 I 8 l I

Q ss g. sa

.. 8g .

l

.as

g. . g. .. E a y ..

ce :

2 as 8 as a en : et n, lll

,,, g$

8 : et I ma na ma saa a f 3 a a, am

j . . ..

s E-O 5

+ i, 23 33 33 33 33 r~s Ia f8 c8 Ea1

E,e'

.. . q. a. .. .. ..

g.,

..=..

mIII m dd de ed da da s.e E)E u nd g. .. .. ..

g.g 3

a a a 3 da sa aa sa as 3.e j $gm -

3 :$i 5" a

I*

a

$*5 a a g

I 2 I

in da ed dd da ed sc

=

IlI lI 1:l]e g.

a g.

a aa a a a =

]1j - ..

da wa as sa as ,..

a gl, -

d a egi g. g. .. .. ..

55 g a ga .

a a 3

g 23 5g 33 32 - 23 22 g..

-v.

g n.,

=ge g. .. .. .. g.I a l q.

a a I. a s l  ! -

.s.s y ss ,g aa aa g .

y ..

y ..

y a. t.

y et : tz : en : ez : s= lll I: 8 as 8 as 8 as a ,,

as as am as z ,, ...

an ass eo- -- - m .m.e..m-......,......

/I 63 22 2 2 2 0 in 181 Ig]e =

Es. =c a n iiii _ :s -

~

2

!=l]e

= .. . , . ,

3 22 2 2 2 3 1 0_gm 3 a a a 1: 8 d a

e If 5 g, 22 2 2 2 3 IiI 3I~l]

= .

3=e .. .

3 ,

I i

=al .

3 l} - 2 2 d

d

!!m]

3 Ogd 32l2

-g- 3 3

e EU E' E U U .

.da.i .

e .M3

.. . , ,.I.

3 ~

3 y ~ ~

I.I..I_l_!.l.

5 a

.w j..j.j.j.j.

= es = c = e =e =e 2 s a , z e ea LEE aE 2 as nn n N

s n

'5 n

3 a

N,--- , -- Mf esse asummemusummme.eN'8.

F/

E-0 i

u 5 .i as a

e e e s -

2 (m 938 EaJ

.d=.

me g

,e g.

a q

pl!E m . . .

n es a e i i e I:1 eig g. . .

R a

j ,imd3 de d d e d e 1

} :E d g-g, g

9 Ig .

g su as a e e 3 e z s g:

lg2 - -- -

g.I I Cl]d 3, -

3

= .

• e a 5

Ill d

=

E2]

gm da a

a i

d d

d 2 :gd g- -

3

. . !g l'.

I g i 3

g, as a e

.1.

s a e 3 s 8 1

- w W]'eln-lE '

I. ' _i '

E l -l-I _

i-2 g

2

!.I E

== = = = c : e 3

I E

-3 i.i

=

3

==

I: I 23 I A E 3 I 3 2 3 E 2 22 h

2 2 2 2 2 i

\

I l

. 1 i

- mm _ ae. e . . . . . ....-=...r.....,w....-...

- - ' - -- -- ~. _ _ . . . _ _ _

f

f I

g . . . .- .

t- p 3

1 e

i

, e a,

5 . . . ...

i in ""

4 Z*

.g pa- 's "" usu -

"i E d m eg

. e

.. i

. .: =. .. ..

gar g.

~. ~.

lw_uI s

.~ . . ..

_ u "" 's "" ssy es E=l]

e .. .. ..

RES A*

.c a

.~ . .. .

t e g MN M. MM mgg M.

4 1 g-a .

1 3 c ue.\ .. .. ..

gg, g.

r a e e ,

E

, s. .=.

. .~ . .. .

I n= -

"" "d ""

==a di W 2. - 3 J g1

.= j =e .. .. ..

Ig] -

, - 54 5 l sp s_]

8

.. ._ __ i E: En "" "i '" .

a nsa ed CE'1

ld d

s -- .. ..

g. E E.

~

52 3 .. .- .. g ..

d" di d" 9_g-]

u

" agg 5 dd i

ge g .. ..

HER I w

W E* -

E. I,.. _ s . e ea  : ,

N E

b lg [

k

= M _

- .E g ..ma - as - ss gg g a .

i -.

g .. y .. g .. ~n y .. .

== = ss : =: r. llg .

M : == l t

2 as 2 as a a3 ,,, g 3 2 as

, Am 22 A2 REE E E =a

, - - . . - . . - . , - , , . , - . . - - , . _ , , , _ _ . . _ . , , - , ...,,,,,--n., n..--.. . _ . . , , - , . , ~ , . , , ,

~

., 7:: cu .* :-

2-D .

d i

~

5 . .. . . .. . . -

gg af 4 m 4J Ag 4d .gg ,

s

+j!

me 32 1

=, u

,e-i . , . .. .. .. m.,

4 gIII s n .- ~

.. . . . .c .. .

w dg 4 4 JJ Jg 44 .gg l En Ele 3 .

.5 3 y 4g a 4 44 Jg Ja .gg

} E s 'l

, i =ug 3 = . .. ..

...g.,

a E .

=lw i. gg 4 gl 4 4 44 Jg 44 3g a

3 s . s -: a g -

a s.

• • 5"E t

= 2 .

EEE .

E. .. . . . .. ..

ea =s:

8-: u g en " " es ei d

=g g

g. , 33g ,

3 g

• 3 g .. . . .. .

ga as a - da as a. .an g t I

'."5 I j E g _5. g. . . .. .. ..

g.g.

g I

. a a .

a u S

s ,

4 5 i E

m I.

I C

a

- $ *. . SS

.I g8

~

I" g na g= n y a p a v. g an d .SS. ,

= z' n : e : s e ut : en =t s ti s ' i a ,, a a a a a 3, a ,, a as ~7 i an a a na na na mar  ;

i L

e ___ __ _ . _ . - _. . _ . , _ _ _ _ _ , , _ ,- --.._~_ . . - . . , - - _-. . _ . _ _ . , _ . . _

_ J _

,g . . . .

1' . . . . . _ . _

E-2 l

,e G

5, . . . . .. ,

y , _im a s s e s.  ;

_== .- 3 , , , ..

liii ,

I E M M M M e6 on- 31 i me y 3 y y ..

) {1 ,iw  : 3 2 2 22 3 ' ga .t i

E 9 E 5 .1 5

l  ?

$ $ $ E E) 1 l.N ! I .d. W.

I I5,a3 Jm e

. a a a r --

Ik .

5: 1 3 2 2 :s i J vi=

s i

'.s Ed E S 3 g3 -- '

< m

~ -

3

_J

)

NM $ $

E .

- 7 t )I g gg ,

j g

3 . .

• g ,d g Ag .. ,

E a

I a j g j M u

3 i i .

~

s i

5Ii!5:=

.- = = = =-.jj ~ s= , i -5,=5 .

- I I 2 I N I 4 I A I 23 i

• I a a a a am  ;

1 L_ __

, s . - -

c.o .

i e

f e

J

• b e

e M NN NSN sg!

e

,3== .: ,i eJ .. ..

g3 .. ...

kS$*

ER;h d#

N N$ NM I57 .* *

IH am ~~ ==

33 -- ===

aa y M $$ NON

. 1 g1

~4

} =3f d -- -- er s.

3-l Q 8

j

.o AO

1. 5 MR

$$ R22

. .g);I 3=l$ , .. .

i

i.- -

!=Eg - -

~d ad ss nd nes a

a (1u

.s-1 - --

3 Ed ** ** ** ***

n El ei d 3 -. ..

ge 'e 'e as As Nun I

57

-1

J.e i.. 55 3

' i

. i i .

I i o

i i I -

i  : - )

g a

, .. a I

a y ==

SF BI

i 22 TE W tt i

,,

as

.. f.f a!n mM su a I

= .. ,,,

na sas lll I

• • .f..  !

.. . . ~

.. ....'*'-.........'I L'. <

E*D

{

5 .

j!,

a d Ij)

I* 355 8Ig n5E EIS# '

_25: r ad 155 """

155 g:g gg lHI... '

" E35 *EI R!g gg(

e 18]

$e EEE *** ***

KES 1 dad d'd l

ggg ji I sde ,! GER SEE nst -

1:!d s

Isq van sua

<sa I

i In Y E$I I3I NIE $$$>

! IiI stl I 3 :li j Sa2n 4 aga E-<

i 3: is is .s s a aus .= s t ass~-  !

a d

3 j ggg --- --- ggn fa2

m as i

s= ana *En are aana ly]

=le egg --- ---

ser i"n ia::

if g g g

}e58 wa$

, 5 mEI , sII 5

1 11 I i I I

l

I

,l ....

55 5

ini_ ,is ... ,,, .~. 2,n ..a -=  :

"Is *jai aa ljj} 353 33 3s3 ss 33 E

g === agg s-= ssg sa ===

! i aa ant aa~ aa a a nas a a as aa 3 a a 1

7 L

• l }i II can as5 's== saa asa a-a 1,,=

[=g g i 88 a 2 sa saa sa2 ea ses aa ss 4 e a a a a

=ll a

j l:i! !

d

. is can ass 8"= sag as aa

' l :g I

a li aa a - are aan aa a a s a.t a aa aa a a E

3 gg= -

con egg m-s nsa sa s-s

$i 3*I a a RIR ses (5

-a nae a 3ASa 11 a a I sus sag aan fagg as s-s ,

1E 383 3*3 4 A f*H

%. ~( us a 5554 na ~ E*E

! ld .

N I

I 3 I I I I lE Ds 3' I 8 I u Esis Ents natu sEsl !sEln Asfa

3 1 I I i

,. i g a

- ~

a A

_ A O

O

e C&

5 me $UE N

~8- N

~ sa --

a~0

_3

~---

C ...

IA.og I*3) 3E

• maa. gag 2

y= A23

-. 3

~ E. 2

y wi ---

GEE

_ in 2

3 3

Ti.

g =

• a a ~"

3* -

n=m a

~

I~

g .

5'

E-at s .%

-=

4 e =~n a ~

3E 3 ,

E:-3 -

g= a n=m o

~I= -

-m -

d

j. :l- ---

=,. :R.~.a p

a 3

j1 30s

• -=

MS-

$E I!!

ind gN MEE i!3 H.:

-u 555 idd a

5  %

e d 3 w 5 g 12E .. 5 32

. .a.

i E ~

O UNITED STATES o

V NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

! wasMINGTON. O. C. 20005 2

• • • • August 14, 1986 Richard G. Shumway, Deputy Director i MEMORANDUM F04: Division of Budget and Analysis, RM ,

James L. Blaha, Director FROM: Program Support and Analysis Staff Office of Inspection and Enforcement

SUBJECT:

PART 171 AND GENERIC COSTS FOR OPERATING POWER 4

The following represents an estimate of where IE's budget

• includes generi l costs related to operating power reactors.used to determine the costs su A. Within the Reactor Operations Decision Unit, the follow be included in Part 1.71:

1. Program Development and Appraisal '

2. Assessment of Regional Implementation /

B.

Within the Vendor and Quality Assurance Decision Unit, the Vendor Program planned accomplishment Therefore, is applicable to could these costs all power be reactors, bo under construction and in operation. applied to Part 171 in the ra reactors, i.e., 100/125.

C.

Within the Enforcement Technical Support and Incident Response Decision i

Unit, the following planned accomplishments apply to operating power reactors and therefore, should be included in Part 171:

1. Laboratory and Technical Support '

i

2. Events Evaluation-

3. Generic Comunications-

4. Incident Response Program NRC Operations Center,.

' 5.

l D.

The costs included in the Specialized Technical Training Decision Unitone part l

are partially applicable to all operating power reactors:thes are applicable specifically to BWR reactors.

i

• These budget.

estimates are, as you stipulated, based on the Pre to show what we would currently offer as generic operating reactor budgeted items. ,, '.. d-}

O I

C>

J l

l If you need any additional assistance on license fees, please contact Elliott Graher on X24969.

a s L. B aha, Director

• r ram Support and Analysis Branch l ice of Inspection and Enforcement cc: E. Greher, IE -

J. Holloway, ADM L. Cain, IE ,

Enclosure:

as stated i

l l

i S

)

I i

4 c.3-S 'l-j 7 .

.I

O o s .

... ... ~~. .--

"dd ddd d"d 'dd dds t e- d. dd"e w

- *dd

~~~

t

~E.3 443 5 ~42 l

gil Et.t. 18.N. ~~ ~=,

E.4.

... ... ... ... ... ~~. .-'

ana sia d'd 'in ind tit - itn ks- esd -

a ---

EEn ej man se asaa A8s -

sa aa agi c  :: 4 _

ana e's ein ase s.eg dag ll.l.

m u

d

3 s and -

~~~

382 184 ~ --E.4 45.3 E;l 4...5.e ~RR -- .. -

-=,

add dis d'i ein ind gis ing 5, k- , d. a s. -

m ***

mER m33 *SS IIE E98 *EE

.A aa agg

as -

G _[ l-l E -sa az ... ... ... ... ...

"sd d as -.-

asi sia des and nii s ea 5'

-i G.

- s. i '9 - --: ,

E55 1m.k j;l 55S

sa

• RRa 8EW<<

• EE ~55 aa j zig gj ... ...i ..~ .--

=,:E.!.

,.k

n. d s.

'in

~..

s ii.

s's "dn sii -

i ids--

dig

n-:  :=g === -

masy -me 3.3

---  ; gag.-

Egl -a ** 6-a **

~~ . 2. ,.

s... ... ... ... i

a. ... .-

nas ein nis '

e' "x -i i--n 5' i r e ,i ~sd

= asigdis -

en'j$ mm ==ss se EE

. fi e e f4 a< i as nsiw-a

- - - =3 < r ,

n M',

~

,u ,

n g.

2 E

nl ngnl

, , a n

a gg 3 a .

Iii

_E 8-I a5 85 m5 i 5 EEl'

- 5

=5 33 m3 g5 al i8 35 3 EE  : INE

• 35 -l 55 s-l 8E l=

~ER 53 .m =

5 a ij g

= 8 m! g -  ?

s W E 5 l

m.

l e l l g

-t . .. . _ .

> M Page i .. .-_

ClautII MalfES o festlers se teesseds, staffroars se Fiti IE Mematf latLE - ~. .. -- - . ..

=_

Fitt EMll Ffft EM57

'freetaaNel15I FIS7 Ntl Out FW EtlES IM MMST fim MM5f j

P5 8 FM'S 75 8 flE*l P5 8 FM *1 P5 e fM's PE 8 fit'8 Ni FN'S N or fatte tsursets P5 8 fil'5 e E . ....... .... ..... .. . - -. . ._ .. - - - -

l N K18 inG NLIl m g g,3 f6 8. Isepeatsame et teetters sa Caestsattsee 4 4.4 0 0.8 e e.7 e e.$ e e.3 l IN A presset leepsctness Itsgenast e 8.6 3.7 3 3.7 S.6 4 S.I e 1.3 0 8 2.9 4 3.8 9

• BN L Engsamerses leeportsess 80sgassi 4.0 e 2.0 0 2.6 4 2.0 0 4.6 8 4.8 9 4.5 0 as IN L Assnesst leapstisees IReesensi 1.4 e 1.0 ,e e.e e 4.3 4 3.5 4 5.5 4 8.0 0 0.e IN A Assessess asones leapertaans itsgsessi 0.8 17 6.4 e 0.4 8 f.8 N l.1 97 8.8 95 M L toadseems tavam leapertians 1889 825 e 6.0 0 6.2 8 6.2 4 13.7 9 11.9 e 10.8 '

leeps. at teetters se Constractsee IAsgassal 4 18.6 95 0.0 97 0.e e 4.3 g ee '

1.8 N l.1 97 8.0 toeps. at Beatters se Constrastsam IISO 125 6.0 e 6.2 0 6.2 97 , 13.9 95 14.8 , 17 15 12.7 M 14.8 Iseps. d Anettwo se Casstractses lietall C3 2. leapstisens d 8 sectors se pre-4 lettseg 4 4.7 e 0.4 _ e 0.2 3 4.2 O,

3.8 4 1.4 8 1.9 4 8.0 IN A fresett leepeatsens IAngsassi 4 7.3 0 18.3 8 4.1 0 2.0' O 1.0 0 8 18.4 e 4.1 3 8. 8 IN & Engessersag leepeatsess testsensi 0 1.5 6 0.6 0 0.3 4 2.9 8 1.0 s.2 e 8.2 CI L Selseneren leapstisans IAmesseel 0 1.8 0 0.5 e a S.4 8 1.9 8' 2.6 e.l 83B L Edseleescal lesse rIsepartions lengsenst e s.2 e e.1 e e f.e e e.4 4

e 2.s e s.6 e 8.5 8 8.3 sal L Eastenary regeredness leaps. langsessi 0 14.9 e 4.0 0 3.0 e 29.1 e 11.9 0.4 0 4.0 838. f. Assadset Resportsens essenemal 0 1.3 4 0.0 e 3.8 9 8.8 9 3.9 8.0 13 8. Sandeessa Assam leapecteens sesgsend 0 0.6 8 0.0 ,e 4.0 4 1.2 125 0.6 55 196 1.2 125 6.4 0 3.8 4 3.1 IN 5. Ameiseses Revies Isepastsens IISI 24.3 0 M.2 0 14.8 8 4 64.7 9 e e.e 4 4.0 Innys. at teetters le Pre-4 Isotseg lesgeonsi 0.6 5 0.6 0 0.0 8.2 125 1.2 125 196 6.4 1.8 0 3.8 I Iseps at teetters is fre 4 lestieg IISI 125 25.3 15 M.B 5 14.7 0 4 196 45.9

' Iseps. d esectors 6e pre 4 lastieg lietall

\ .

1.9 8 8.8 0- 8.5 SS 3. hepestaans at enesters se Startep 8.7 0 S.2 0 4.3 0 l 4 6.1 4 3.7 4 3.7 lie A Resort leapestians aAssiassi e it.6 8 0.0 0 24.9 8 33.3 0 29.9 4 4.4 884 L Eagssesrieg leapettsans Itsesend 0 3.2 0 1.4 0 0.6 8 4.5 4 4.6 4 8 4.8 2.2 4 8.9 4 8.9 est L delapserda leeportsens Itsgassel 7.4 4 4.9 0 7.8 8 7.8 8 4 8.5 888 8. Aseselegatat Seeser leapsetiens testissel 8

2.5 6 1.2 0 0.5 0 4.5 0 4.0 0 8 4.9 5.9 4- 2.3 8 1.S 840 L Eastgener Propersesses leaps. IAsgeens ;8 M.4 0 15.4 4 ,

1. 23.2 6 27.7 8 f.0 8 9.0 088 F. Assedsat leeporties eteesesel M.7 4 58.2 4 28.4 H.2 0 06.5 't 8 8.9 8

0.0 0 8.0 4 8.4 lasps. d Asetters is Marts, sessaamst 8.8 8 8.6 0 0.0 8 8 9.0 6

30.2 0 28.4 0 9.4

- gesps, d esenters is Stats,188 49.2 e e6.5 8 M.2 4 8

! legs, d Anetters is Eartep listall 8 33.5 4 33.5 29.7 8 32.4

ft 4. leapestsens d esectors as t eraties 15.3 e 10.2 e 22.2 4 W.5 0 97.5 048 L pressat leapestians magsenst 8

8 82.5 0 07.9 4 146.4 9 4 72.7 4 B3.3 0 19.5 0 19.5 4 17.4 e 89.8 l

til & Esenessrsag leapstt6ess semenemol 9 12.3 4 11.2 0 15.7 8 33.3 0 33.3 0 29.9 0 32.5 ett L Seaegnards leasettsess IAsgeesel 4 25.4 0 27.6 4 27.3 8 18.8 8 10.8 e 88.5 588 S. Reeselegasal leistr leapocteens taegnessi 8 19.7 0 15.7 8 15.4 0 17.0 8 109.5 8 IM.S til E. Eastgenst preparedsees leeps. IAugsanal 0 113.1 0 BM.4 0 146.6 8.8 j 8 H.3 0 110.3 4.4 1,N1 8.0 1,MI Ill f. Besident leapsetsens IAsgsessa 4.4 8,708 0.0 1,Ms 8.8 l 2 8.8 l lH 4.0 1,627 8.8 f,4H 8.8 3,4H j

388 5. lashassel estadence assesenal til E. lechsstal assistance IISe hW,42 8.8 8.8 2,596-0 8.8 3.0 2,396 4

8.8 3.4 2,IH e

8.4 0.8 1,669 e 4.8 0 1 Mi 352.1 0.8 8 1,MI 352.l 8.8 9 14 MI 355.0

lit I. f all field Esergene lesgeestl 1,lH 279.3 1,'627 270.9 1,MI 316.5 8.8 1 Hf 88 2,656 234.7 2,lH 8.8 1,Hf 8. 8 1.Hf lates, at 8%sers se Operaties (8sgeomsl 0.0 2,596 3.0

! I,726 0.0 2,396 3.370 335.0 3,lM 352.8 3.370 352.1 lates at senters se speratsam satt

-' ** m* u es 279.1 4.223 278.9 3,870 316.5

O

..m ... n.. ... ...

ggg

dd= --- n. : .=d =dd d.d e g.l sseewedsaad

_~5 ana;

........... 5. 5

=__l ct a a

... -~. ... ...

i

........... . ..- a :4 edd dsd ase -

Egj.

_. essessdeaae adsed

E.9

~~~ ~~~ ~~~

s ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ E. ~"

I  : " "~-- * * "..

~.

E_ t :

. ........... ada.d ads Add

~.

d.d 444 gg l l 444.J4dadad

= ... ... ... ... gxn

,.. ........... .,s..,s . _ . .-

,r: ~ ~

'p =;__. ........... ._..-

4d44d 4a4 4dd d4d 444 gfg

,.ggj 444dddd444d

... ... ggg

,: =.

g

........... .g..g a a a;

1 c

- -83 n e

=s_=n n n. s. ~

3 ,e.

. m ..s ~ m_

s m m_ _ =~. nm..

. , .m. e_

.m.e-- m e. n . ,

E,s .:g,. t..: s.

2I_,

=_,

e.

.: e.

.N u_=::Ir,:W.Eri ^^ N

~......-:.-..

-~.~= ~ .~x -

~~-=

-- . m.

~-

n

= _. . n.::

.:n. m, ,::::

,: ... 3.x ... z=c

E c.gg,

_ .~ -

i .e r;-

.: ..n . n. . _:,=.

.n t

ib-

=_r,3

m : . 2 2 2._: 9.

e-~~, g-

.~._.=

. a. . . : ..m .

~ = _._.

= .

g... ,,,

jt

s

........... .g.

aa;

= 1 ---

- - - assi

I I =

-- -  : __ a _ :i

::=

3 12

.gg

=

2 __-_

i :sni I::',_

e

E ll_g 3 I

-- --s _

= a- z -

m;. gE3 _-

~ E l - 3,_5

~

- j g ='1. :1_ .. 3g 3 k3_.. 3 : -'~

1))3: I]5R__]

_.- E g gs-= ,,-

g 1 '

s ala_If y ,=

=

=

g a 1.g i _*1_

g

} ..I_3 r ,.

3 ,3 s l. _3_ _ } [ _ = i .

I -_ = 3 .;3 )

=Il _a_ =l 1 .

]*

• 3 ,

i s_r_r_i_t z=s s- - .-

t-[! =g n _i l_ s !=} ,aa nji ] I ,gg1 it 3= -

.i samaa:gnjii.z_.

s. _

- , , , 13=.- 4 z :. 1swa 1,25

_=_a= sailjjs!.:)lj _1

= -i 3-=

3 3 j l . *. mtts *** En=3 g i i 3riti a=n .i a y s- m.3a . e l a i. ass Ja ddd

.I'$: aERf53 dddd.I _e_

g add & . a a EEEE y i z =5

=_=_5m. =3

- n__ = =_ m_ _

a_ Mi = c_ a_ S =_=_

_ _ = n_

' 4 &s

'S * ,,

r '#A

-, . - . - - . . _ . . _ , - . _ _ . ,,.--,,_....m__ . , ,

O o s

3 des gdi ggi g.l g ved des ,

m ... a,

• se-jE.l e .

s.: s wwi d_gi ved des .

I__wl 4

ig.

... ... ... ,n" ,*

I,.,

g1

,.. .y. ,,,

-=a =a=.

in.l =-a a-3 3 _

-=

u=-

... ,x,

i =,.

~r,

~ _. . .

, *N,

,*5 -7*

- *** s_ =_ =.

-f

- OIG"w:; s~m "c *a "z as =.==.

c, :i. g . ... ...

=_3. 4

_,!.1 g

.! =

v.s g ___g wg

= =- :! a w ,;

ved new d :s - -

ai g- ..., ... q,,g u)t;g.; ...

._l -,- ---

m.,

E!

-:3=l.

m-,

~m -=

e-n n. a m. s_ e -~s 3,. c-E., ... ... ... -

_e:

s

~

m. ..

idi den die 4_R.d

,r.e.!. idd ll-.

g El w

I E 55

=

nl d

I -

li

1. 33igs l 5 1-i I -

J i Il=3 I -

- 193 gg

==g .E4g a,g. ,a j m J s.s -

4 e a f.I.If ).g= g}1 j }Jg,3E 3 =..

- E}I :.YY,I a_ s2s , s__ 3 33, 3-EE I in E g

l 5555 5335 i.EE il i El ER BR

=

O o l

I dadada

adan ..g ag 444 saa saa 2;g g aguas

..l --- -.. na n

genz3 g-sse ~ -

---

gu -

~. ~-

-.i Er

... ... saa a*;-

-., .. . .-. -- addaa agg 444 Jan

1. agaag sada44

.5g! - .- ... .,,

n ..... .ma ... ...

j,.. genas -- -

.g.sse ~ - 33

~~

=rl .

i . -. . _.

. eaa agg 1.,, .. . . .. . ....

aaaaa agg 444 eaa agaae dadada l5 3

= ***** *** *** *** *** -==

i. f r :: ES***'-- - *E**~*c ~ . ~.

~.

~--. ~ .

-. ~ ...

agg 444 saa saa agg p

s ej*g. ..

.5  :

4faus anda44 addan

--- -na s= me-sue ----- -ng --- .--- ss

.l Innas -- - -- - - s _.

__ly-:[ r: -

-.- ... ~.-

... agg ni1... ..... .-..~. .....

.:daaa afr 444 444 saa 33 agaag .:aaada g - l: g s ! ... ... ... .,,

l!,g--

w.

.r.i se...--

- n --..

-~. . . , .~.

. m n=~. ~....: ~ .~.,. m

. e. m. ._._ n,

2r,:: a.

. m.

-x . . . )

--~~ - --- -a

-:E -: ----- -me - m e.

ge--e- .

mRI-ug

1

. e r :J --.

en~ n.m, m.. e. n n. -~- n a

!. =_ r,::

n.a-s --a n e m. m. s. ~. ne. - ---men -a, ~~

• E.E

• E.i II.!.

3E825 f****E . .

a e una

• ~~~

i a 111 -

- ** s i

1 ...= -

I-s 3: 55 E 3... 3= ] -

u.

- -: .- 4-3 g -

W - s;- .

II -

i - -

Il 1:i. lia 44 l]...ii-Is3 Isia

]i. .:= .:9

- ]s ._

.2 s

g a ss

- gg s -

m l -s ] s a.sI,_. r=a =a I 3 i _

ta

! g = - g a =s ,1

= , .

. ,,3 Ig ] - -},- -"= }5 =jj jll 2 ,, 1jjia 1_.1 i

s

E

_i e

                                                                 = 8   =,  d d
                                                                               =s m
                                                                                .m l
                                                                                         =s  !a
                                                                                                  }.

sas ,

                                                                                                       }.sa
                                                                                                            ,r-}i     r,t a32s s    i
                                                                                                                              -  .      2 s!!:       2    -11?

13 =- g

                                                                                                                                                      .- . I lli ;p-illi g     u   s n

j:3 E a 3 3 3 3: 22 a 0  : g .: 3 3 -addddl add""ds adddse EEEg :-3=3 33 g ==== an.maa een

                                                                                                 ---                                     EH.             EE            .E E
        -                      31                  ----

i

l l l' O O l 1 i l

                                                                                                                                                                                                                  \

i l l

                                     .a.. .,            ....
                                                        =as.               .n.m.msnn
                                                                                   ~~----                       n. n.~-       n. n,         . m. m.                 -es.....m..a q.

i, 4 3- ... .g.g s.g...,, ,., -- --- E5****- ER aa ) .g r

s. s..- 25........

                                                                                                                                                                           -~..asa;a
         .m.:
                                       --s
                                       --e               n-- a m. e.        .n.est-nn
                                                                                    ~~~.--                      n. 4_
                                                                                                                    .s         e. n.                                                                   -
          !                            ---                -:  - - s a-a---ss
                                                                                    -           --               5*H                                                  ***----

n-RR

                                                                                                                                                                                                   ~~

s E-- ci

                                       ...                .      . . . assaassa
                                                                             ~ ........                          ...

asa ss 444 aawsswease asg aass

            ;        95
             .5-35                        ---                 -:-s   ,-

a-s-- ss - -- a, -- --- am------as n-

                                                                                                                                                                        --                          -~

i i.fc!. asaaass asa ss .. aa essaae

  . 3l. w,;

ese dass

       .I                                                                                                                        ..             ...                      ........,,n
       .:                               ...                .s.s - -

s.....,, -

                                                                                                                  ,.,                                                     ns
                                                                                                                                                                          --                          ~~

n__n,,,., e ai usi..,' ... .... ........ ... dsa sd 444 MaA44Adads l Asf as44 44Anas44

                                                            .g.,                                                   ,.,           ..              ...                       ,g......z3 g.;                  ...                                  3. ...,,                                                                                         -,                       --

s s

        .t s
                                                                               ........                            . . ,          ..             ...                       .Aaa44Adas.
                                                                                                                                                                               . . . . . . . c.
        -!                                ...                ....              adaeaa44                            a d a)          ss            444 I.,y                  add                JAdd E                                         -=-z              n-a--                              E*2             cc                                       E 5. * * * * * * *.~~*-
         -y             -i                --.
                                                                  -    -        - -                 EE                                                                          -

ss e r.

                                                                                                                    ~.~             ..              ...                     ..........

44adaAdaaf

                                                                                ........                                            as               Ass s . . r.

44f

                                                               .4.

Jads dadaAAdf did

                   ,_QjQ

...a-

                   .5                                                                                               s-s              ss                ---                   ==------se                     n.
                                                               -,-c               :-a---mm                                                                                   s-i5-!I                   s-=                                                                      - -              --

3- nn

,r

                   ;-          m                                              5                  -

a

                           .4                                                =                -8        -               -

2

                           !a=              -

n m - 3

=

I_

g

-  ! -- II g gE_E =3 -

I_I 2

                                                                                                                     'r g                                                     3          -

- '5 I. E_ *l'3 I.- g85 & -

15 a-

                         *:w                                _y4= :1),==                                               Is
                                                                                                                        ~

I_- se y - y ,_ 1:: - 4I I 3_ E I...d a1 5- 3 ,3 ,a g i,s

• g, - -

3 J: .. 8:334

                                                                                   ==m                                ja-'                       3=
                                                                                                                                                                                      =
                                                                                                                                                                                       =
                                                                                                                                                                                             ]lgli,*Ipg     as 1s          *]l! -:j-?           38 3         J!l!?s-lg-c     _

a . =I I I g2--- -s i3 l a =m =m s 'gI _ 5-5 1*3=

                                                                                                                                                 ~3 5 r

8 siin.s I I

. 1-

• 3 .g J .

i 3 E :;:;:; 3-11 l'I~3 1-1 I= NIf a 5 2: 1

                                                                                                                                                                                                  -E' i
              ,           =!              Ist-                   -1      -

rs-F Al :.F -- 5 g3alJ ,

                                                                                                                                                    -lll             189 a:-            -r3 5!a5-            ja t- -53 13 133)                                    1                                                                        --

2 '.311333511

                                                                                                                    .))Yu d i d 3                   -mu3 ni -*i3131sas                                                                               33   5         ~a                                -
                                         -*a$a ~

I .3 ama ddd44d13 4 gdd3 g4d43 g4dddeggg gdd.B g J gII) I g IIIIIII l

                                                                                  'EIEEE z                    .II.-               .II            PIE _                                                   [I

                                                     .                O                                                                          O b
                                                 .s lg.l
             ,s*

i y aa assa aaa das eaaease gia -aa. 2_

                                                                                                                                                                                         "a e g
                                       ..            ....               .ma             -an                     333 3g                              333 E-el                                                                                                                 -

se 9 da assa aaa das edadade end dde dag l5 1g-- l *** ---

                                       -.            ----               -am             -as               *EEE*RE                                    REE, 4

ifc!. e i .. .... assa aaa gag swad"de did dde des g se ig..m'j g-r;. .. . . . -

                                                                      ,-am               -am                     agg gg      -

333se i ------- --- --- ---

  .!      -l-g; 3 g
                    -        i          --

ea

                                                      -~~-

asea aaa aag aaaaaes gag aaf eas 2:

          .i

8. .. .... .ma -ma *EER REe HER

                                                                                                                                                                          *-~              -**-

A ll gE ! se li i... l bi .wy da assa 444 fdf daaaadd ggg - auf dag .l 1lil la1

                                        --             - - -          '-==                -==                      sEs se                -
                                                                                                                                                      =s.s-.
           *U   I ,. ,                   ..             ....

4444 fad fai 44a4444 ggg usf f4g Q: da

                  .e                                                                                          ..==..a                                                       ...              ...

is _ - ,i .. .... ... ...

                                                                                                                          ~~                           an3 me:                                                                                                                   -
                     =..                 ..              .... . . . . .                    ...

ggf Aaf 4Af y; da 4444 .f a f faf adaadsf -

                  *g           ;
                                         ..              ....              ...             ...                       335.,3                            ,g,                   ...             ...

s t.

s

                  ,  1                                                                                    E

• i s - 5 -

j ititi II - i 1

                                                                                                                                            =

rg  :=

                           =                       1 iin
                                                   -s                i1131=                               i                            gas y               1l. e-ar 2jij= .I .! .!                                          1=                                         es 3-J           .i=  3 1 111                     assi lig] m.
                                                                                      -                   -                  gggi-                                            Ig]

1 la1s Ia . j =m , 2 I3 illi [g}

                                                                                                   -                           s
                                                                                                                               !!n     **                                  s 8s i
            *              's i si 1'g)g sii Ill-        ='# 8         l 3[ii Ii 1,,i 1-gg.i.i.3           l.
                                                                                                                                                        ]

g33i i}]zIl} I' 1 i s- 1.,111]

                                                                                                                                                             =                                       .

i

I nI)=

                                                                    =
                                                                                          .                   .-                                     n=33=

5 3 s!s

                                                                                                                                                                           #~~y             gii,.
                                                                                                                                                                                                ~~

t n ayE e ee djj $ =s' n

                                                                                            }}e }na =adaadaj E EE E nii n 3~33-3 g                                                                                                                                                                                          EE a -.        ,          31.            .-.

q 955 .E E; ME ,.555559 - EE ,.

s8 o 3* "9" M*M "9"

                                         -==               ===     -
                                                                            .- = =                                                                                              .

I1

                                                                                                                            <3
                      ; Eel--

32 N*" *** * .~ . ~ .

                                                                               -==

_i -== = = =_ i le-i_r

                                                           =
                                                                =_ a_
                                          "97              999                 999
                      !.W=si.?._.-==             !         ===      _
                                                                               -==
                              -:                           .-- m a.
                           =r:                                                                                                   .

s = =r: n-n ---

                                                                               -==
     -            =           = >.
                                          -==              ===      _
                  ._        =
                  --              i       - - .             .,,

gt., __i

rs --

              ==l-r 5.

n-~

                                          ===

s m =_ mm

              - - i !!!- =.

E I:f-. W 1mgl E

                                                             ,,& ~                                                                                                            .
                   ?.

5j,gi "ee w$g -ww

E 4

_-: = =.

                                                             --       E.

1 r: --

                         !=-.              ---               --                            -
                         ,h$l i                 "$$               $$$ .'-$$           *

=

jg-. --- g _8 8 m

gr: --

                                    !                          I       _

I_I3 .EE mi - is s: :I

• 5  :: 33  :

Ji --: ., : . la gii i-Jg] 111i!I 23 3 s E4 . 1 u 'l ,-  :- E

                                *!

• Il. l

i ])ll]i s333 I

o 1 i

                                      . iiii
                                        -=ce n       - : a3  3.i          . i
       =                        Wi             55
            -                                         : ,.                                                                             '                                              e

_ _ - _ _ , .___v.. _......-.--__,,,,,,m_,,, ,,_.,m ... . _ _ . , . . _ , ,, , -_%,,m. . , ,. _ . , , _ , _, -,y_.,_,__,,,_ . ,- , . .

b) l -i s

                                            .-.......                                .......-----g gassasaaaaga                                                         aaaaa                       aaa                  3:;

eaaaaagag g.l g m e s_ g., ....og.as m3------. mas. - j

m. .,..,..,. .4.a...

                                                                                         - , , ,. . ,. ,. . ,. g                                           _....                       _.-                  g a a.
                                            =___ ....
                       .gm    .
                                                                                                                                                                                                            ,,5 Ig.                   ... 23.gg                                 gg........ggg                       ,                                                                                           a
                                            .-.. ....                                 ....--._--.-~

gaaaaaaaaagag asasa asa gag lgg;, gaaaaagag

n gg........ggg ..... ... ggg jg.; .....cg.gg ..-

r. ,

e e

                                                                                                                                                            --_..                       --.                      ...            l 1

gaaaaaaaaagas asasa asa gas  ; _i_.l g gy 8 g a d a a a g a g.

                                                                                                                                                            *****                       ~~~

RER i E-l ****c5*HS R3********R35 _

         =,1-   _1. s
                                             .~.--..--                                  .....-~_--_..

asada asa gag Ee'!.g.l L y gaaaaagag f . a d a a a a a a*g a g , d' . ...

                                                                                                                                                                                           ...                     .gg          ;
                                              ....,g.gg P
                                                                                        ."g........ gy                                                         .....

g.g j Ic: .t i

                                                                                        "g:::::::: ;;;                                                          ";23                       23                      ;;;

si3;j .. 22532: 22 3 ~~~ ***

                                               .....g.gg                                 .g........ 33                                                            *****                                               ..

E.g

                             .c is..                 ~........                                 -............                                                              aaaaa                      asa                 gej

y} a s a a a a g a f g g a a a a a a a a a g a g

                          .-~.

it,. .....g.g3 i.g.........gg ..... ... 33 g f l-  :

                                                                                                                                              -                       __      _         !__=

l } - I :lli ls fl i y I d53 i 155535

                                                                                                                                                            )1113                       !!!*!

ess 2 a c_: g I --- 3 3s 1 (1s - ama

3 3- -

I -

                                            == figs}.

u

                                                                   =Esss
                                                                   -                          I Is_i i {l_l--s                          E g }} ilIII31111)                           =

1 1 11]1 i, 1liting=.=.s=sIl{i=s{g}at}1gj}1 g i 3

                                                       - ,..u ---           se. =s-n il 311_i        gg
                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -3    =
                      =           =          .i
                                                                            ;.;.;.         Il=g}}_i}}111;1111}]

li3

                                                                                                                                         -                                                             ,,I           lii mis)t=}j-i1111 i

1 s ini

                                        , as dddda
                                                         'i 11                    --

3j3.1 a 3

                                                                                                =ia aa                   i =a-lele              ...

s s.i. a ......,

                                                                                                                                                                             ..               sjj, m>3.

2,_ gttg gaddd d d}gg g g g g g El 555555 .533555 EE - 5533 33 s

          , , ~ , - -                     -               - . - . . - - - -
                                                                                           ,,        ___,-,__y,-,...,_.-.-,.-%.                   -
                                                                                                                                                            . , . - ,             7      - . - _ - - ,     -._,e            ,,-

                      .                                                                     O                                           O 4

t 333 ;5s 253 '235 355 gg g ... ... sun.

                                                                                                            ...              ...                                                                        )

333 55s 250 ddi "dd

                           .l;j i

m

                                          .,               ...                  ...           ...           ans#                            :

IEri s .. ... , 253 ddi "dd l

                             !gg                            333                  252
                                                            ...                  ...           ...           nya ij *!r!. .                                                                            #                 -

.. i ... ...

g.  ;;;

m;j 333 253 , 250 dei "di g, 31,., ... ... ..- ses - gg r: lII,g;1 333  ;!:s 05: 22 232 u

                     .             !*..                      ...                  ...             ...         .gg lall!.l                  r                                             ,

u!!ECi 323 252 UUU III 55 3 :j . :f.,

                                                                                                              .ss ist:
                                                                                     ...           ...                             9-e ms.se             -mm
                                     !_=tj

33_; gas wad is=.

jg.. e: se

I v

i. ljg! I =55  :-

                                                .i                                                                 Jai ;-

li - I - frI . li I _ 2 1-= s-a 442

                                                                                                                           .3 153 m             g;i          sjls Al=s IE!           gjln-3 9

i, mi iii1 1111 , g,ii s i i 1

                                                              !!!! 1111 i 3.nsi 3a3 3 .5:=i
                                                                                                              !ii c a--! l:

WI RR HR EE I.

           .                                          O                                                           Q
                                          .                                                                                                                    l
                       .              ..                                               bb         $$$              b$N            $&&          &
                                      $$        EN            &&      $hh g                                                                                              '--

g;j as ss s.s. as --- --- sg s.:

                                      --                                 ~~                                                                        aa          ;

I

                                      $&        54            &$      $&h              $$          $$$             $YY            $$$          &

in se sa as se as as aa l-s

i. . .- aa

• 8

                                       $$        e&           5$      $$$              $$          $$$              $YY            $$$          &f
               .I          lI I"

in i ma as sa as as --- --- --- as aa l l'5* ~; aa *

       =        ,                                       ,

ss as ss ege es ses saa ess egg gjgg,j s mi qs. as se ge as --- -*- --- gg _t'Eil 44 444 s44 44J dgg

           = =. , ... ,3 .W.gi         44        44            44      4ff W                                                                                                               ---
           =

g;! as as, an qq ss --- --- ga 4

1. -- .

           ,_i                         9 ~9 99             99.    *99
                                                                       .==

99 9. *. 9 9. 9 -9 9. .* .9 999

                                                                                                                                                     ,=

_: g"_, ,,

             ,r. i. _ - :               ==                      r       .,,              ,,           .-.            ...             ...

er -- =a

3. ,.

                                                                                                                                                      ~~

a.. .. as 22 aa see

                                                                                         $s sua            ses          .$ .,.,

;g!

                  ._I-c                 g,        g,            =. =.   .gg              ==
                                                                                                                                                      ==

s  : ~~

I . r i = *i sai i= i 3 ag- i_s s3 ,

                         =                                                                                                                                  -
                                                             =_r                       s                                                               r 3s.      :-

l .n 23. a

                                                             , ; =.
                                                                    .                  i n-2            r r=,

a,

                                                                                       ,.               gg,                            _
                                                                                                                                                   ===.

i=

                              .i n r1
                                                             =jj
                                                             =i         i        -

8 i 1 r s.8.s8 s==s 133

                                                                                                                  =: }jj g

Jg ==3 1 = i

                 ,       =            an3       r. s_ a s3= lI' a                        J's3 'juj           r8 3 1 8       8~-

3 gj j j wi

1 i

zlE E18*Fr *E58Fr a$sj 2'3 '8 353 }}}s)s . - j 8113 le a. a. 33 - sj ~ *114 'II I l

a ll-1

                                                      ~

0 :I I e.:g I "z E E 'eI $ E EE Ea#Ij#~3' 3 3 3 2 3" '3 3 - .i!::I l y  : EE HR 55 i

        =                NI              E                                                 E
                                &           h                .E ..                                                .             .

       ^
                                                             .-      ,_ .         , . c ._      c O                                             O                       \

FISCAL YEAR 1987 PROJECTIONS OF'NRC COSTS FOR NUCLEAR POWER REACTOR REGUL'ATORY GENERIC PROGRAMS (Dollars in thousands) Costs for Programs Regulatory Services Research............................................ $ 74,356

• Safeguards.d8. N.....".. N..... ".....*.. *...*..#..#

    .                  .                                     M...... # # #
                                                                 ......     .       '2.326c" u~

Reactor regulation.................................. 24,346 Inspection and enforcement ......................... 15,482 Analysis and evaluation of operational data......... 7,720 Total..................................... $124,230 Because the costs listed above apply to all power reactors, the costs have been divided equally for purposes of calculating the annual fee. This approach is consistent with the Congressional directive, that all fees be reasonably related to the cost of providing services. 1

                                                                                      '             l S. Fines, Penalties      Interest, and Reimbursements Comment: Comenters said that fines, interest, penalties, and reimbursements should be included in the cost basis as collections under other laws.

C-4

                                                                                              ~T~
   . i, August 14, 1986
  }*                                        U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COPellSSION FUNDS RELATED TO OPERATING REACTORS (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS)                                 'ohea isssee          1 m <,-

ft. , FY 1987 Estimates contract staff FTE's M Dollars Costs !/ TOTAL

1. Nuclear Reactor Regulation Program Operating Reactors: 33 $1,110 $ 2,500 $ 3,610

               - Safety Assessment                                                              6,893       6,093 91
               - Project Management                                                               303          303 4
               - Safeguards Coordination                                                            76           76
               - Technical Assistance Project k nagement           1 303          303
               - Technical Support to Others                       4 Operator Licensing:                                11              180             833       1,013
               - Generic Activities                                7                              530          530
               - Regional Oversight                                                                 76           76
'              - Technical Assistance Project Management           1 Safety Technology:                                                 822             606       1,428
               - Unresolved Safety issues                          8

, 25 665 1,894 2,559

               - Generic Issues                                   32            2,243           2,424       4,667 h- -
               - Regulatory Requirements
               - Research and Standards Coordination
               - Human Factors Program Issues 7

17 843 530 1,288 530 2,131

227 227

               - Technical Assistance Project Management           3 l                                                                 74            !QT6"J          18,483      24,346 i

SU870TAL

2. Inspection and Enforcement Program Reactor Operations

150 $ 1,383 $ 1,533

               - Program Development and Appraisal                20          $

484 484

               - Assessment of Regional Implementation             7 i

Jo-..a:sfr w L , g,4

           ~

l. FY 1987 Estimatss Centract Staff FTE's Dollars Costs TOTAL.

2,865 t. Vendor and Quality Assurance: 29 $ 860 $2,005

                                                 - Vendor Program                                                                                                                     OO j                                                 Enforcement, Technical Support and                                                                                                                      ;

Incident Response: 120 830 950 ' i 12 1,041 _ Laboratory and Technical Support 10 350 691

                                                 - Events Evaluation                                                   75             484                      559 7                                                   3,669
                                                 - Generic Comnunications                                     2,010                 1,659 24

' - Incident Response Program 3,690 691 4,381_ 10 >(n U - NRC Operations Center 119 $7.255 $8,227 $15,482 SU8 TOTAL ' i Nuclear-MaterieIeSafety and SafeednNhi $1.486 $,2,326 9 3. Power Reactor safeguards (pertJ 22 $ 840

4. Nuclear Regulatory Research Program

                                                                                                           $29,170                 $2,964   $32,134 37

! Reactor Engineering 3,009 240 3,249 3 Thermal Hydraulic Transients 16,820 1,362 18,182 17 Accident Evaluation 11,550 3,204 14,754 40 Reactor Operations and Risk Waste Management Earth Sciences and 1.122 6,037 i' 14 4.915 Health

                                                                                                                                   $8,892     $74.356 SU8 TOTAL            M             $65.464                                                                                      I i                              5.                Office for Analysis and Evaluation          44          $ 4.590                 $3.130 $ 7,720 l

of Operational Data f $ 84.012 $ 40,218 $124,230 TOTAL 540 50HRCE: FY 1987 President's Sudget (NUREG-1100, Vol. 2), Data Base Detail, and memos

from RES, IE and NRR, and back-up detail from letSS.

j

      ;r FOOTNOTES                                                                 ?I 9

lishment areThe direct FTE'sfactors loading dib

;          1/only.

The FTE's shown in the Data Base Detail for each Planned AccompTh l are computed as follows: NNSS RES AE00 l

,                                                     NRR         IE 17      TOTAL
      .                                                            162        46                  0FFICE 80                    75          41 Variable Overhead (0/N) FTE's         132          194                   E8 M          3T5       TH 4

Fi*ed Overhead$USTOTAL (0/N) FTE's 239 122 471 779 355 T85 Direct FTE's 36J ETJ5 TOTAL FTE's 50.6% 47.5% 45.0% 45.7% 0/N as a percent of direct i 9 4 9 O

2/ Staff costs were calculated by multiplying the FTE's by following labor rates: $t NRR IE NMSS __ RES ~ AEOD_ f jh See i $17,370K $10,210K

)                                                                        $38,340K $55,570K                                     3,690         Below Salaries and 8enefits                               11,950        17.470        6.220                                                                                              ,

730 520 A etnistrative Support 1,450 5.250 l Travel $24,320K $14,420K

                                                                         $51,740K $78,470K TOTAL 360                  180 603         1,135                    $80,111
                                                                                       $69,136     $67,555 FTE's 1                                                                        $75,750 Rate per FTE

! $17,250

!                                 PTS Salaries and Benefits                           5,720 4

Administrative Support

                                                                                  $22,970 1

4 Total i 330 FTE's $69,606 l' Rate per FTE

!j                                                                                         44
!,                                The FTE's for AE00 are:
                                                                                     $3,060K 44 x $69.606                -                   70 AE00 Travel                             __

1'

                                                                                      $3,130K i

Total l i i 4 i . l

O O Based on my telephone conversation with Claudia Seclig of NMSS on 4 July 31, 1986, the attached tables provide a breakdown of the 26.4 direct FTE budgeted in FY 1987 by NMSS for power reactor safeguards. The source of the data was the NMSS C-3 budget schedules. e d% C James o loway i l i c_s T i

O . Q Office of NMSS Power Reactor Safeguards FY 1987 Division of Resources Between OL's Under Review and Licensed Units Category OL's Under Review Lic. Oper. Units Totals FTE Contracts FTE Contracts FTE Contracts

1. Policy and Regulation .3 --

                                                                                                                     .3        --                                   .6         --

Development

2. Policy and Regulation .35 -- .35 --

                                                                                                                                                                    .7         --

Implementation 10.2 $640,000 10.2 $640,000

3. Other Technical Programs 3.05 $200,000 3.05 200,000 6.1 400,000

4. Power Reactor Safeguards 1.1 --

7.7 -- 8.8 -- j Casework i Totals 4.80 $200,000 21.60 $840,000 26.4.$1.040,000 i Sumary 22 FTE for licensed units

                  - 7.7                         FTE for casework assessed under 10 CFR 170 W                               FTE for generic applications of 10 CFR 171 x 1.506 NMSS overhead 21.5                         FTE rounded to 22 FTE and $840,000 in contract. costs
,                                               to be used for 10 CFR 171 i

1 1 i 1 l .I 22 FTE x $67,555 = $1,486,000 i Contract Costs =$ 840,000 l Total NMSS q $2.326.0005:?! i l I (. - 4 T

b.i-f] Q. Office of NMSS Power Reactor Safeguards FY 1987 Category FTE Contracts

1. Policy and Regulation Development .6I I --

10.9 U $640,000_/ 2

2. Policy and Regulation Implementation 3 400,000f 3

3. Other Technical Programs 6.1_/

4 i 4. Power Reactor Safeguards Casework 8.8l -- Totals 26.4 $1,040,000 UFTE should be divided equally between 0L's under review and licensed operating reactors per Claudia Seelig, NMSS, 7/31/86 discussion. E10.2 of 10.9 FTE is for regulatory effectiveness reviews that apply only to licen:ed operating reactors. The remaining .7 FTE should be divided equally between OL's under review and licensed reactors. The $640,000 in contract costs e applies only to licensed reactors. f 3

            -_/      6.1  FTE and $400,000 in contract costs should be divided equally between OL's under I                     review and licensed reactors.

4/ 1.1 FTE is for OL's under review; the remainder of 7.7 FTE is for licensed reactors. i l i 1 i I a [ T

_~- . e .e. . ey. -.. . . o u ......a 2, m. ,.. .

                                                                                                                                                . . .. . e E-                                                     C)
                                                                                                                                     = un

() m-

                                                ---=                             -

8: I i_ _ Il l s_ _ _ .. _ _ _--n==I=I=-l1=85:11nnnnn111.. l _ l I_ p. s_ t _ I_ _ I_ . _ _1_ 11111 _ _-_ _ s*v _______ g .,vs

                                                                                   .        s    -.s-..-                   s.._.sd idd'id dddddd-dd -      a...s
                                             ,d*dd                                 d dd dd dd E

r, i. g E

• f Offf* -

l

r. E.c E!

Ag w* zees . mases-me- idd*sd*ze==us~cs-v

                                                                                    " ddddd dd                             run-zan dddddd dd*d E      E'Idd""                                                                                                                                             /

2

5. g - g ggg- A; -

g i t - - e  : - n eme-zanzeen==~es c 1:=- l w  ! aamms sees - a = esa s~ = =e se - e n - ses-se sesses ss s

                                                                                                                                           -                                                  g L3       4 . ]lxgs      .

g: g - ===- D . gsr E === . s

                           *s                                        i.                                                       ===-zanme==ss-es-=
                                                                                                                                                                ~

v y N 3 E= s=ssw g e s. g

                                                                                     ~

a = = = = = = =s =s essese ges =e gs seesse es s - v 3 g' i

                                                                                                                              -             E88*

Es  : E_

                                   . -r I

592: i E j REEER*REE sess ses seses EEEE*2n*9 ------ ***sesFEER:-

                                   !_E4                                :
                                                                       =

=

                                                                       !-S             E

• E EEE' lEE! = g y ,

Er-l___-__--__ 4y_ -___--_g___-__E P {RREE lI>

g g __' g E

                                                  !                     E x

gg o o .- E IIIII mme-E 8 - i: _ -- . m. .e .s .s. s a 2 og8g_. 3,. " Ee- .

                                                                                                      -_-"                            EE           =      maammE*

lE! 8 -  ! = -----== Ig i

                                                                                                         ===            =             ==                  ---- ..

ge  !

.... == .. -

lgEjag EE E. E. E. E. E_ !.E. !.  !. 4. 4. 4. 4. 4. E. E. Els gi

                 ,5 g i.

____-_______-__ _____-_==----- up ,sEEE  ! sg i: EEE E E EE ge

                                                                                                                                                    ==-----Es,        g WE.              m===
                                                                                                                       =e-                 -
                                                                                                                                                     ....._~              .

3 g!: ,_= _=

                                                                           =

l==.=. sg

                                                                                                                                                     ==-----gs
                                          ,y :=nec i

i gvss es= _= - -_=-_---____-----__= == .

                                          -_: ___ -__=__-__-_-_==

gEi i: ________________t____,_,_r z.

                                                                                                                    !IE                       3 I

Es i: !: (4e i s i  ! is 1 E Eg s  : g ls*I="- s e _

                                                                                                                 ,g=                                              E E

i. I h.Ew*g_s=as=s.g5Ea rw- a E a s"

i. g E__"gI -

E" I-Ewwww 3555EE E5 sw E .E3

                                                                                                 *E:Wi"us.ga:I,*        - -Eg*Ess              ga"*E*I                  f(**

I;gEI="E! I i E

                                                                                                                                      .- E-ts
.,                                              ,            E _-                        .E          W.sw

w. - . g -

ER!m- W sy .*Wgslm r

                                                                 -                       sv su                                                                             $E 8 f              :

c_1 s s I - - e_s l,ies= - s  : t s i i t __________-______________--

                                            ---________g.,__-EEEEEE?EnEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE S:
                                                                                                                                                                                 +
                                                                                                                                       *s.2 2 2 2. ". 'J .2 2 2 2. . E. E           53 Ia
                                                                                                  ..: E. E. E. E. E. S. :.

g EE a_ s_ = c_ e_ z_

                                                                                                          -                 -       E==~~E=-

m_ -~=_ = E 3 ci - ,, fi 3 - 9

                                                                                                                                                                                                                             *e *y                  'o D o Do  *gf
                                           ~

g-- e= o --

                                                                                                                                                             .                                        O I                                                    I                                                                                                                                                                                                             -
                                                            -               IlI _ ll = IIII _ lI. . . . . = _ . ., . e.. . . . .._..l l. =

_I =I..=_- l _l l. ] I ! g'usss- =sasarn- .=za-ax n--- . I g B esse saaass' e a s e = e :e = - - z.=tsn=remwn, a.:aesaise~a- . fc "" T' -

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    - ~

gwisseum sesses=stxnam~ sesescem = sawe = a - m sa-- e n n r p r z a r A = = t r. - r - g r

                                 '

• e seasseesse .- .

E_ . g ge II. -- - s-...._....n,..-= . . j j f l j

• V's : ems=es=n e= t s s = e - ~ ===mnzan- e ns=w n=en.,e-

                                   ,             ig-l                                         asase                                            . ass ea-- e esas easse e-                                                                                                                          !

l1I Ej E ff* x , 3 25= szzm y _g E M . .* .* .* * . _ ~ _9 .9 2

• n

                                                                                                                                ~ . _ . 2 .2 = M_..= .R 3

• s * .-_. *
• 9 .M _... s =.= 8 3 5 ; l 1g -

gi II*

• r i

                                                    ,E .M.4;;*
                                                    =
                                                                         ..            25"aa;,, FEE *Z 8 -..
                                                                                                                               , , 9 : E .M .B Es.                      R .* ;..* .= .E.*M                           . *M.. .a..,                **EE    ,;,E B .f i

18 E II*

• gi '

sI Ea ,________g_________g_g__I.g lsg! gi  :

                                                                                                                                                    "'                         Is "s ==sssssi 333,3,,

4

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      ,a

[fg'g'

                                                                                                                                                                                                 *            "gs s"sg                      "J         a g=gll:-

Iv_a EEi gul g l-g=enal esee j:a"345g"55:g"g"5[j 4 s es I i g === E E n l. I. *I.n* == *

• ws===s = .rs =* i l. =

                                                        -                                                                                           .-                                                                                                                          -                  1 8*          I                                                  *          * *****                                                 ****                                                            *s glget                           En                             E                                                                 E438

_ . E R .E E !.. !

                                                                                                                                                   ....                       !. .! 5            . ... I l l i. .l i. ..E                     f .t. I

• g*

als un _________.________________ E=-~~rE== a- a== sana =~ - si I-s E s susas g=--~s=== s g=======~ -ag E BEEEE ~ gg . . ..... E=-- =E== a s4==nex ~ Ec .. eg, g i g!!!! R==- =2-- E=E=====--~ -gg Eil . ag l gs , a l

                                                                                          's =               t-                                                                                                                                  -3                                                1
                                                       'i'                      *
                                                                                           =t

• I I-Ings

[ u=st" gsg t pgg ,- i t i 3 I* r5 g i 5=5-_ = 3.. Egla

                                                                     =          m             a Eg     =3ug[ErE                = g= lt 5I -5_== s E

a E

                                                                                                                                                                                                                 =

gg . i lE!E!l g!g!![ .pg:,ligg ag_.l5 . s 5 llll>ra >gs I lIllllllljilliii lill*lli

;                                                                                      lg                                                                     g                                                                                                                                    ;

__L_______I_L___________,._______ ___

• REREEEERREERRRRREEMERERRAEEEEEEEEEE4535M '

                '                                                                        =                              t y

55555 IIEEEEEE E5555555555555555555E5555 E R RRR RR a z 3's9

O ... .

                                                                                                                                                                                          .          . e a          -

O ,, I 9-n - --- I O. .,. n I ._ l l. 5v=.,. _ _I ,I. I_ _I _I _s . . l.. I.t. m- - l . _t i. .t. _ . na.e lmI .,I.

i. t is..s_a_i_s.tii

                                                                                                                                                                               .nnnn,
                                                                                       .,s ,ase     .. _...

g,,6 sa aa ' - e ,- -- .........

                                                                                                                                                                    -a      sessee 3

is_ l

g. , i i - ,

g - - t /q

_:. g:i gla a-

                               > ggg                                        :=--n- nam-es e .- ass se                                    - et   *.      -- at-mzzarM8289858
                                                                                                                                                    ,: s--- ----d iBg:                   i
                                     ! g e j:

_  ; n s .r -- i , i

                                     .__                   _-                                                                                                                                                l               ,
             !                                                       _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . ,                                    . _             _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ , .                      3 n
             = 3 " L,'

I._. E 4

                                                                                                                                                         - - !- E       -----!!I!I                           I 4                  ~7 5gu9-                       =
                                        #~

s 4 a 3.Egga

                                                                                                                                                                       -       t
                                                                                                                                                                                        -         M a                         ,

bll  ! -( )- - -----I EEEEEE lR E *Ii !g .m; $$$$

                                                                              ====

vgI g man a m I!se s E R,f.i 5

                                                      .                       E..ff[               Es_l                             g            N       I E I NIE!                                            !

an

            .4 g

_____n________-___________ _______-_________- gE! 5 n-ce-------- E5EE EEE i n-us ---- -- 53!W E EEEE EEE E E E n gg n nom ... . . x =e---~~- - , gger gra

                                        ,, g ,                                                                                     e             g e-e = =~----

g: i ._ ___ __ =_= _ _ __==_. _ _ ._ = _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _

                                             -:          r r: :

3 i _ - ___._ ____ > I i I E_ GE i E y.: l f -

                                                                                                                                .m                      j '" c -

j E E I.I t ' g i jglg's_g=E! -S *i 555

                                                                                                                  =5=

Ej 5 u sia

                                                                                                                                                                                                           )

u i 55 E EE l n 9E-E sk E !;-[ e gesagg- g Eval_ll['gg=5=- y 3ss l

                                                                      -3.bEgw                                   iEEEE                                   S~        _tyREEEE g

B5 m I ir t. e r E m rz.r m E ll-t

                                                         ;a                                             g'-

g$w . I E a as

                                                                  ;EITg                    e          -

I EEE Es 19 (j 3 .

                                           =

in L______ e _____ ___ i .I8 ..____ __ g j a ENAMEEWEIEEEEEERENEENHERREEEEI3EEEEEEEEE 1 I 1 g 3 ----- -. .. -.- E 33 33333333333r.z5.- N sssa hv ==sasazza ::

                                                                                                                                                     . _____ _                                                         s E                                               N          5 r            ;w a                              r                                               a          e                                    c "---
                                                                                                                   .                                                                      .lI
          ,      , _ , _ _ ~ ,              ..                                                                          ~' ~ ~' ~~ ^                                                          - ~

o .

                                                   .   . .-- _            n   . . . _ . .

o o x  ; 1 l

                                                                                                                     \ '

FISCAL YEAR 1987 PROJECTIONS 0F I;RC COSTS FOR NUCLEAR j POWERREACTORREGULhTCRYGENERICPROGRAMs  : (Dollars in thousands)

                                                                "                                                       4 Costs for l

Programs Regulatory > Services

                 ,Resesrc$[8.ffk         .T.4M.                 NNNY.                     D'" ;'($M7{.3563, Safeguards..........................................                                 2,326            ;

Reactor regulation.................................. 24,346 l , Inspection and enforcement ......................... 15,482 Af'alysis ard evaluation of operattoral data......... 7,720 Total..................................... $124,230 Because the cests listed above apply to all power reactors, the costs have been , divided equa'lly for purposes of calculating the annual fee. This approach is consistent with the Congressional directive that all fees be reasotably related to the co3t of prcviding services. S. Fines, renalties, Interest, and Reimbursen'ents ,

           ,Coment: Comenters said thet fines, interest, penalties, and reimbursements should be included in the cost basis as collecticns under cther laws.

C 3 5~

                                                                                                                /

   = ,

August 14, 1986

   '                                                                   U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION FUNDS RELATED TO CPERATING REACTORS (DOLLARS IN TH00SANOS)

Rschau+ y

Sae.. /-%fjAst d FY 1987 Estimates Contract Staff FTE's M Dollars Costs 2/ TOTAL

1. kc1ebr Reactor Regulation Program Operating Reactors: $1.110 $ 2,500 $ 3,610 33 6,893

               - Safety Assessment                                                         91 6,893
               - frcject kragement                                                           4                             303          203
               - S3feguards Coordination                                                     1 76          76
               - Technical Assistance Project Management                                                                   303          303 4
               - Technical Support to Others Operator Licensing:                                                          11             180             833        1.013
               - Generic Activities                                                          7                             530          530
               - Regional Oversight                                                          !                                76          76
               - Technical Assistance Project N nagement Safety Technology:                                                                         822              606        1,428 8                                        2,559
                - Unresolved Safety Issues                                                  25             665           1,894
                - Generic issues                                                                        2,243            2,424        4,667 32                                            530
                - Regulatory Requirements                                                    7 530
                - Research and Standards Coordination                                                      343           1,288        2,131 17
                - Naan factors Progra,a Issues                                               3 227          227
                - Technical Assistance Project k nageiacnt                                74T           T,751           18,433       24,346 SUBTOTAL.

2. Inspection and Enforcement Program Reactor Operations: S 1,383 $ 1,533 20 $ 150 484

                - Program Development and Appraisal                                           7 484
                - Assessment of Regional Implementation
                                                                                                                                         ' ' ' ~ " ' N# '
                                                                                                                                                            ""*'*f b Y-         _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -    _ _ _ _ _

   ~                                                                        FY 1987 Estimates C:ntract          Staff Dollars           Costs                         TOTAL FTE's Vendor and Quality Assurance:                                               $2,005                            2,865       h
             - Vendor Program 29    $ 860                                                         b Enforcement, Technical Support and incident Response:                                 12       120                              830              950 Laboratory and Technical Support                            350                               691          1,041 10                                                         559

_- Events Evaluation 7 7S 484

             - Generic ra==unications                                     2,010                 1,659                      3,669 24
             - Incioent Response Program                                  3,690                               691          4.381_

10

             - NRC Operations Center (O                                                                119    $7,255          $8,227                          $15,482 SU870TAL

3. Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards $ 840 $1,486 $ 2,326 22 Power Reactor Safeguards (part)

4. Nuclear %=1 story Research Proeram, ,

                                                                        $29,170           $2,964                         $32.134 37 Reactor Engineering 3,009                                  240        3,249 3

Thennel Hydraulic Transients 16,820 1,362 18,182 17 Accident Evaluation 11,550 3.204 14,754 40 Reactor Operations and Risk Waste Management, Earth Sciences and 4,915 1,122 6,037 14 Health 111 $65,464 $8,892- ($74i356 - SU8 TOTAL

5. Office for Analysis and Evaluation $ 4,590 $3,130 $ 7,720 44 of Operational Data 540 $ 84,012 $ 40,218 $124,230 TOTAL e

SOURCE: FY 1987 President's Budget (NUREG-Il00, Vol. 2), Data Base Detail, and memos from RES, IE and NRR, and back-up detail from NMSS. Y _ -- - - - - - -- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ ~ ^ ~ - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ _ _ _

?

FOOTNOTES direct FTE's The loading factors ({w 4 1/ The FTE's shown in the Data Base Detail for each Planned Accomplishment are only. The FTE's have been loaded with variable and fixed overhead FTE's art computed as follows: RES AE00 TE NMSS NRR 17 TOTAL 162 46 80 41 0FFICE 194 75 Variable Overhead (0/H) FTE's 132 T2T TG Fixed Overhead (0/H) FTE's YT2 3T6 SU8 TOTAL 239 172 471 779 TBD Direct FTE's TOTAL FTE's 353 @ 760 50.6% 47.5% 45.0% 45.7% 0/H as a percent of direct M - - -- - - - --e. ,

2/ Staff costs were calculated by multiplying the FTE's by folicwing labor AEOD rates: bg' NMSS RES HRR IE 61 See

                                                  $38,340K $55,570K  $17,370K $10,210K 6,220     3,690  Below Salaries and Benefits               11,950     17,470 520 Administrative Support               1,450      5,250      730 Travel
                                                  $51,740K $78,470K  $24,320K $14.420K TOTAL

( ll 683 1,135 360 180 FTE's $75,750 $69,136 $67,555 $80.111 Rate per FTE

                                                          $17,250 PTS Salaries and Benefits         5,720
                          ~~~

Administrative Support Total $22,970 330 FTE's $69,606 Rate per FTE 44 The FTE's for AE00 are:

                                                           $3,060K fh                          44 x $69,606 AE00 Travel
                                                           $3,130K Total
                                              /

P q e i "s

N me I l l l ! l 4 8 i l

                                                                                                     'I                          l

{

                        ,                i                                                                                                                                                      .

i t i i i  !

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ,                                                    i
                                            ~                                                               r                                      t                               f                                                                           _

i . , , , , i i , , , , , , , t { l ( l f l jj{ $ l l l a l l 4l I L I I I I 0 ' i i  ! _f I J

                                                                                                                                                                                   '                              !                  t 3

3 } s~~ k i  ! . i I i i i

                           ,             r-                        -- r

• i

                                                                                                                                  + i i           , ,

i e i i 1 6 i j 4 4 6 e , i f i f I l i i I , I ' l I i a l 1 r i

                                                                                              -~                                                                                     '

I _ ZZ f i i 4__ I i

                            '                        ~

l 3

                                                                                                                                                                 ,                                  ,                                           i                 , , ,                                                         ;

.== m - ' l h l l  !

                                                                         !              I                                 l              I                       l         t         [              l I

_. t

                                            ,-                         [-                                                                                                                                                                        ,                 1              i                                            -i s                 t                     s jeO                                                                                                                   ,              ,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    -f 8                                     4                      I                                      f h                 h           4                                  I              8 l                                        )

l l  ! ' l i l I k I i l l l I l 1 I i  !

                              !              i                                                                                                                                                                       ,                                                             e                                              i T..             I                                                                                                                                             ,                         ;

k* , Il ,t -

                                                                                                                           + i i i
                                                                                                                                                                   . t i ,

i i i i 1 i . , , p! ~ i

                                                                                                              ,          , , i ,                              . , , ,                                                   s , .                                       .                       ,,.

_ v%, _ % i ri' S i _'k _% r: o-o M 4 . '3

                                                                                                                        %_                        +~3 A

I IL u g r N-m i y: y i

                                                                                                                                           '                 '%                                        t                %

b , j  % E'G' Ik. 3 6 i , i i . . . i i i i i . i i , a i : i.r. . i r , , ,, , i i s 1 i

                                                                                                                                                              *

• 2 y W '

t- f kc.:. ? tid,m-h-2 -, v 't. o- --5, -

                                                                                                                                            ,     i .'
                                                                                                                                                   ,         ,                          .%M
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         ,              %                             o eg m          ow                                 ks                      v                               ,e Q ,; M                                     N%^ "                     n_'s O -g'                                                                                        iN                                      -

t < g g

        %                        ig-9                                                                         .            . , . ,                                ,                   ,,                                     ,                                     ,                          ..                                  ,

hq  !

                                                                                           . ,                  i        .- i , i
                                                                                                                                                   ~          "

i  ; i i r n ii. ~. i a

                 %                      y                                                                               %

7 4 9 i n W s ,_ ' T

                                                                                                                                                  'h          9 "u'*'-                                                                                                                                                      '                               *                                                             ~

1 j  : g :g i ' i 6 4 i ii i . , i i i

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                .i,-                     ,           i I                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         4 I                                   f   I l                                h 4-.                 '

d,,: O; M' l i ; 4, v' E, O? D _~ u i i a ei i s i , ec. $

                              -Q f
                                                                                                                                                                      ,,l                                                %,i                                                 -

a ; i i

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              .f i i i                                                                 l        i                                                                     ,
                                   ,%-                                      .              . i                 i                           i                                                                                   !

l 4 j l l i ( I ' I i l i l I l l I , i  ; i i I N i

                                                                                                 !                      E E i I                                                       $.                                                            E                                     D m1 i                           i                            ,                                       i          4 e

tt

                                                          < :        I                     I i                                l                                       i i                  l                                                                                             y                      i mm.r
                                                ,.                                                                         +                                                                                                  q                                                            e
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           .                                                             t i

(

                                                                              '\k                      I.

I

                                                                                                                           .E  '

L.. {

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   $                 N,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                *i D                                                      c l
                      '           i                    4           g;. g a i, j,                                   b ',I- g d T<                                                        d,                          E                            i.               7                                        1                                     w i.

n,, a s .

f. '

s p o .t~ i . l ' 4

                                                                  -u y

7 t * $A-' t" gw j t ,

                                                                                               *                                                                                              '                                                                      f
                                                                                                                                                   ,f
              'I                         .              ,    YI                                                                                                                                                                                                     4 yI                     3
                                                              < c a s, t. o e                                               w    3                    -
         ' h, > . C f,f 5,'h        I                W                                                                                                             y                                          Ss U:           I           l                                                                                                             d                 4 d                               tq w . ' <_1 _l Y

Y h h h h {

      'N)I,

_1 _ ~h[

• a * * =
• 2 = 0 M02 0TITIi ,

2 5 2 g2aa2;ganaggag 9 J ',7 9

l s 0' o UNITED STATES s, g l [ g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION , 3 E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20066 +

    \...../

MG 12 g HEMORANDUM FOR: Richard Shumway, Acting' Director Division of Budget and Analysis Office of Resource Management FROM: Gail H. Marcus, Deputy Director Division of Regulatory Applications Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research

SUBJECT:

FY 1987 USER FEE ESTIMATES Pursuant to discussions on estimating RES costs from the FY 1987 President's Budget that may be applicable generically to the proposed User Fee rule for operating reactors, the following is provided: NUCLEAR REGULATORY RESEARCH PROGRAM

SUMMARY

FY 1987 President's Budget Generically Applicable Costs Program FTEs Contract ($K) FTEs -1/ . Contract ($K) Dollars , Dollars Reactor Engineering 51 $ 40,100, 37/ $ 29,170' Thermal Hydraulic  ? Transients 14 $ 16,400 3< $ 3,009/ Accident Evaluation 19 $ 19,0G0 17, $ 16,820/ Reactor Operations and Risk 41 $ 11,800 40/ $ 11,550/ < Waste Management. Earth Sciences and Health 16 $ 5,640 14 / $_ 4,915/ (LessWasteMgtmt.) 141 5 92,940 111' 5 65,464-

              -1/ FTEs are " loaded" with overhead (less Management Direction and Support (MD&S) ) and are allocated based on a prorata share of program contract dollars for each program.

Rationale for allocation of these costs is e closed as Attachment 1. flYw Gail H. Marcus, Deputy Director Division of Regulatory Applications  ! Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research i

                                                                .s z_s    q
                                                       .  ~...?        ,
                                                                               , .    ..          -g .

4 i l Attachment No.1 SEISMIC RESEARCH PROGRAM I

                           ' FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $11,900K Applied to Reactor Engineering Program - $7,400 Applied to Wm, ES and Health Program - $4,500 The seismic threat or hazar'd is present at all operating nuclear power plants in the U.S. The Seismic Research Program censists of the definition of the hazard and the response of the nuclear power plant systems, structures and All elements except studies on soil liquefaction components to that hazard.

are considered generic. The $200K portion of the budget for soil liquefaction research is considered nongeneric. AGING / LIFE EXTENSION RESEARCH PROGRAM FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $5,250K Applied to Reactor Engineering Program - $5,250K The aging process involves systems, components and equipment that are comon in This research program will (1) identify all operating nuclear power plants. , and characterize aging and service wear effects; (2) identify methods of - inspection, surveillance and monitoring or of evaluating residual life and; (3) evaluate the effectiveness of storage, c:aintenance, repair and replacement practices. The research results will be applicable to all plants and are thus generic. CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY RESEARCH PROGRAM FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $1,300K cr T 1 ATTAH 1 TO MEM0 87 USER FEES 08I11/86

[; _O o 1 Applied to Reactor Engineering Program - $1,300K The Containment Integrity Research Program is evaluating the structural and leak behavior of steel and reinforced concrete containment buildings under severe accident conditions. The scale model tests on steel and concrete containments is considered to be nongeneric since the individual model tests do not represent all containments. However, the separate effects tests on penetrations and seal and gasket material is applicable to all containment types and is, therefore, generic. MECHANICAL E00lPMENT QUALIFICATION RESEARCH PROGRAM FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $2,800K Applied to Reactor Engineering Program - $2,800K The Mechanical Equipment Qualification Research Program is providing the technical basis evaluating and improving the criteria for qualifying mechanical components such as valves and pumps. The research results will provide input to national standards such as the ASME Code and regulatory documents such as regulatory guides and is therefore generic. REACTOR VESSEL RESEARCH i FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $5,820K AppliedtoReactorEngineeringProgram-$5820K Generic research conducted in the area of reactor vessels relates to embrittlement which must be measured and accounted for. Further, all vessels are made of heavy section steel, the basic properties of which are studied in these programs. Analytical fracture mechanics methods for predicting the behavior of all reactor vessels, and assurance of conformance with federal regulations on material toughness, are developed and validated in these I programs. A portion of the funding for these programs (excluded from the sum listed above) especially in the HSST program, is concerned with pressurized W 4E 2 ATTAH 1 TO MEMO 87 USER FEES

     .os/n/86      _

                                                             ;O                                                           o e

thermal shock, and therefore is not considered generic because the PTS issue I has little or no impact on BWRs. i r PIPING RESEARCH l l i FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $2,600K Applied to Reactor Engineering Program $2,600K l l Gzneric research in piping is limited to the Degraded Piping and International Piping Integrity Research Group (IPIRG) programs, and Aging of Cast Stainless Steel. Materials an.d operating conditions for both PWRs and BWRs are employed i

'                         in the two former programs, the aging program has generic application because                                                    l l

' all reactors have some components of cast stainless steel, including pump  ! casings and valve bodies. NONDESTRUCTIVE EXAMINATION RESEARCH FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $3000K i Applied to Reactor Engineering Program - $3000K All research in this area is generic because all operating power reactors will ! at sometime be decontaminated for maintenance and be decomissioned at end

operation so licenses can be terminated.

DECOMMISSIONING AND DECONTAMINATION RESEARCH FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $1,000K l Applied to Reactor Engineering Program $1,000K All research in this area is generic because all operating power reactors will at some time be decontaminated for maintenance and be decomissioned at operation so licenses can be terminated. M ~ 17 ATTAM 1 TO MDW 87 U5R RES ~

.anvas . c. .,s 3,

                                                                            ~
                                              .O                                               O THERMAL HYDRAULIC TRANSIENTS                                                           ;

FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $3,009K l Applied to Thermal Hydraulic Transients Program - $3,009K f The part of the Thermal Hydraulic research program that is generically applicable to all LWR types involves research into two phase phenomenology during accidents and into water hammer phenomena, support for the Technical l Integration Center which performs studies on all reactor types, support to the j development of the Nuclea.r Plant Analyzer which runs both BWR and PWR safety analyses, and support for cooperative code assessment and experimental programs involving both BWRs and PWRs. In each case the work is either totally generic  ! in nature (e.g., two phase flow phenomenology) or it is mixed work, sometimes on PWRs and sometimes on BWRs with no accounting for the separate tasks. l l l ACCIDENT EVALUATION l l FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $16,820K Applied to Accident Evaluation Program - $16,820K l The Accident Evaluation program involves severe accident research without consideration to reactor type. The research deals with s,uch generic phenomena as severe fuel damage, fuel melt progression, core / concrete interactions, j hydrojen production and detonation and steam explosions. These phenomena are f applicable to severe accidents in PWRs and BWRs. The severe accident sequence l analysis research applicable to either PWRs or to BWRs has been excluded from the generic total. RISK AND RELIABILITY RESEARCH FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $10,505 Applied to Reactor Operations and Risk Program - $10,505

                                          +

The total effort in this program is generic. The research involves development of improved methods for risk analysis of reactor events that may lead to cd

                                                                                                                          /

Ik 4 08/11/86 , 4 . ATTAH 1 TO MDW 87 USER FEES

l

            ..                           10                                          O                     l t

accidents, analysis of the risk of severe accidents and the consequences of these accidents, analysis of the risk of fires and floods with and without accompanying seismic events, human reliability studies and development of reactor system reliability methodology. All of this work is applicable to all reactor types. HEALTH EFFECTS PROGRAM FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $415K Applied to Waste Management, Earth Sciences and Health Program -$415K

In the Health Effects budget of $600K, $70K is for continuation of a thorium worker studj and should not be attributed to power reactor licensees. Also

! included is $230K to support implementation of the major revision of 10 CFR a Part 20, Standards for Protection Against Radiation, primarily intended to ( regulate worker protection. Based on an approximate distribution of radiation workers between power reactors and other NRC and State licensees, half of the Part 20 support work ($115K) is attributable to power reactors. Included in the

              $600K was $300K to provide contractual support for the Radiation Exposure InformationReportingSystem(REIRS). Almost all of the REIRS contract work is processing termination reports from nuclear power plants as required by 10 CFR 20.408. Thus the fraction of the $600K budgeted for Health Effects which directly and generically supports power reactor licensees is $415K.

I REGULATORY APPLICATIONS FY87 Generically Applicable Budget - $1045K Applied to Reactor Operations and Risk Program - $1045 Included for FY 1987 are: $1,000K for regulatory support, and $295K for protective action decisionmaking. All of the $295K Protective Action work is for support of power reactor emergency planning. $750K of the regulatory support work is directly attributable to power reactors. 1 d# onnVM ,, 5. , JTTAH.1 TO MDW 87 USS RES ,

                .  , , . , . . . .n.-      ,             . ..

o o x FIS N , YEAR 1987 PROJECTIONS OF NRC COSTS FOR NUCLEAR 00WER REACTOR REGULATORY GENERIC PROGRAMS (Dollars in thousands) Costs for Programs Regulatory Services Research............................................ $ 74,356 Safeguards.......................................... 2,326 Reactor regulation.................................. 24,346 Inspection and enforcement ......................... 15,482 pmet aF7 Analysis 'and evaluation of operational data;..... 7. T7,7201 Total..................................... $124,230 8ecause the costs listed above apply to all power reactors, the costs have been divided equally for purposes of calculating the annual fee. This approach is consistent with the Congressional directive that all fees be reasonably related to the cost of providing services.

5. Fines, Penalties, Interest, and Reimbursements

Comment

Commenters said that fines, interest, penalties, and reimbursements should be included in the cost basis as collections under other laws.

4 g/ I l

o o

    ~

ll I PROGRAM TECHNICAL SUPPORT l l (Dollars are in thousands, except in text, where whole dollars are i used; staff numbers are in full-time equivalents.) Total FY 1987 estimated obligations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$30,525 h Total Funds and Staff  ! FY 1985 FY 1986M FY 1987 Actual Estimate Estimate Salaries and Benefits $ 18,910 $ 18,270 $ 17,250 Program Support 5,140 5,080 6,550 Administrative Support 5,656 5,860 5,720 Travel 1,049 1,080 1,005 Total Obligations $ 30,755 $ 30,290 $ 30,525 /, c,Y

                                                                                                           ,h(~ ,f (Staff)                                  (365)             (355)                   (330)

Program Support Funds and Staff - 3.,

                                                                                                                * .0 The Program Technical Support program provides direct                                              $p.d technical support to agency programs. At headquarters this Program is supported by the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS), the Atomic Safety and Licens-ing Board Panel (ASLBP), the Atomic Safety and Licensing                                                                              ,

Appeal Panel (ASLAP), the Office of International Programs (OlP), and the Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Oper-ational Data (AEOD). Technical support is provided at both headquarters and the regions by the Office of Inves- l tigations (01), the Office of State Programs (SP) and the Office of the Executive Legal Director (ELD). The alloca-tion of program support funds and staff to each office i follows with narrative describing the programs and their needs. FY 1985 FY 1986Y FY 1987 Actual Estimate Estimate Funds Staff Funds Staff Funds Staff ACRS $ 285 54 $ 250 50 $ 320 42 ASLBP 608 51 822 48 820 38 i ASLAP 3 16 10 15 10 14 01 0 38 0 44 0 44 ELD 74 102 60 96 60 91 OIP 53 29 10 27 50 25 , l SP 722 35 695 33 700 32 AEOD 3,395 - 40 3,233, 42 4,590 '44[#'(,v*.< y TOTALS $5,140 365 $5,080 355 $6,550 330 (# j 1/ Estimates do not reflect the 4.3% reduction required the Balanced Budget

 .j and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. The total NRC reduction is
            $17,974,000.

C -(, 85 /

                                                                                                            .            t

August 14, 1986 I-

• U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COP 9 FISSION l .

'                                         FUN 05 RELATED TO OPERATING REACTORS (00LLARS IN THOUSANDS)                                      spraes of Aeop k mez) i\n O

FY 1987 Estimates Contract Staff FTE's M Dollars Costs M TOTAL

1. helear Reactor Regulation Program Operating Reactors: 33 $1.110 $ 2,500 $ 3,610

             - Safety Assessment                                                              6,893       6,893
             - Project knagement                                91 4                              303         303
             - Safeguards Coordination                                                             76          76
             - Technical Assistance Project k nagement           !

4 303 303

             - Technical Support to Others Operator Licensing:                                11               180            833       1,013
             - Generic Activities                                7                              530          530
             - Regional Oversight                                                                  76          76
             - Technical Assistance Project k nagement           1 Safety Technology:                                                 822             606       1,428
             - Unresolved Safety Issues                          8 25              665           1,894       2,559
             - Generic Issues                                   32            2,243           2,424       4,667
             - Regulatory Requirements                                                          530          530 7
             - Research and Standards Coordination              17              843           1,288       2,131
             - Human Factors Program Issues                                                     227          227
             - Technical Assistance Project knagement            3 74I             3",TU          18,483      24,346 i                                  SU8 TOTAL

2. Inspection and Enforcement Program Reactor Operations: $ 1,383 $ 1,533

             - Program Development and Appraisal                20           $ 150                           484 7                              484
             - Assessment of Regional laplementation i

-l

\
           ~
                                                                                                             .fr  ** : f/'5" 2 Oua,.            ,4
    ~

                      -~           -    -

FY 1987 Estimatms Contract Staff FTE's Dollars Costs TOTAL Vendor and Quality Assurance:

           - Vendor Program                           29                 $ 860              $2,005     2.865                           %

Enforcement. Technical Support and incident Response: 120 830 950 12 1,041 _ Laboratory and Technical Support 10 350 691

           - Events Evaluation                         7                     75                484       559
           - Generic Communications                   24                  2,010              1,659     3.669
           - Incident Response Program                                    3,690                691     4,381 (Q          - NRC Operations Center                    10 119                  $7,255             $8.227  $15,482 SU8 TOTAL

3. Nuclear hterial Safety and Safeguards $1,486 $ 2,326 Power Reactor Safe 9uards (part) 22 $ 840

4. helear Regulatory Research Program

                                                                        $29,170             $2,%4    $32,134 37 Reactor Engineering 3,009                 240    3,249 3

Thermal Hydraulic Transients 17 16,820 1,362 18.182 Accident Evaluation 3.204 14,754 Reactor Operations and Risk 40 11.550 hste knagement, Earth Sciences and 4.915 1.122 6,037 14 Health

                                                                        $65,464             $8,892   $74,356 SU8 TOTAL           111

5. Office for Analysis"and Evaluation $3.130 $ "7.7207:

of Operational Data 44 $ 4.590 540 $ 84.012 $ 40,218 $124,230 TOTAL 5000CE: FY 1987 President's Budget' (NUREG-1100, Vol. 2), Data Base Detail, and memos from RES, IE and NRR, and back-up detail from NMSS.

   -0    -

e

   '                 ~

1 FOOTNOTES T% 4 l ~ lishment are direct FTE's FTE's. The loading factors l 1/only. The FTE's shown in the Data Base Detail for each Planned AccompTh are computed as follows: NNSS RES AEOD NRR lE 17 TOTAL l 162 46 0FFICE 80 75 41 194 Variable Overhead (0/H) FTE's 132 353 T2T E8 Fixed OverheadSUBT0TAL (0/N) FTE's YT2 239 122 471 779 .,) ISD THU Direct FTE's 353 T"IT5 TOTAL FTE's 47.5% j 45.7% 50.6% 45.0% 0/N as a percent of direct i I l 4 4 4 1 l . o - ._

i l l 2/ Staff costs were calculated by multiplying the FTE's by following labor rates: AE00 i NRR DE NNSS __ RES See 4 4

                                                                                   $38,340K $55,570K       $17,370K $10,210K 6,220          3,690     Below Salaries and Secefits                    11,950         17,470 l

A ministrative Support 1,450 5,250 730 520 Travel

                                                                                   $51,740K $78,470K       $24,320K $14,420K                         ,

TOT 4t c=O 603 1,135 360 180 FTE's $69,136 $67,555 $80,111 , $75,750 Rate per FTE i

)
                                                                                           $17,250 PTS Salaries and 8enefits                  5,720 Administrative Support Total                $22,970 330 FTE's                           $69,606 Rate per FTE 44 The FTE's for AE00 are:
                                                                                                $3,060K

(O 44 x $69,606 AE00 Travel 70

                                                                                                $3,130K Total I

i. b 4 i

                                                                                 ------.~~~~-~-.mm~

[ _ l{ f

• I 8 l t I ', I ' ! l l l l' l l ll l

l . 1

                                                                                                                 . . - e. > >       ,

h I C T . 3 Y t I 5 t,i A.. _ . .. _

                                                                                                                                   ;i            ; j l                                                                              ,                                              l                   , . ,                   ,

, a~3 - - - . . . . . - ., , , , p. .

J fl '

                                                                                                                             $     i I           !         i  l t

• l r

                        '                                                                                      *                        ' t 6              i                  l i                   i              'l                            4             6          4 i               3 l     l                                     l
                                                                                          '           ^
                      .                                             i         r          j n                 !     2 h                                                                              a t

i l 1 -I i l

                   ,h                                           I i i                    I        4               i       I        i             6                       I

( A' l

• l I I h l l l l 4 1 6 . I s t 0

                                                           ,               ,                         i                    i l                                    ,

l f I

~. d

                                                           ,                                          ,           !                 i    _ i                       ~ ~ * ** fi r,
                                                            ,                             i           ,                             i i                            -* 1     9.

i e t f l t i # t 6 e

                                                                                                                  '          i j              %g               l f   6 i 1 1                 1           I i               !  l'        l l          l                       l    h'

{ , i i I I {. '

-4 A . b yg QT . - H

j , . l p}.F l i i p i l i i 4 i t i

• ll

                   . lI.
                                                       . ,      i l i         l                      e l          ! I i i          i !       I          i                     (

s , }

                                                                                                     '                    l  '
 .           .tl i l: (j a                   -
                      *i tyD                                                             l                l       r          i                                                .

u k T/*l

                % !-4, d.

i I. I i F EC p I I

• i R (( II i i i i i i ! i s i I e

                                                                                                                                             '          t                i
           }-3          '.

fti a

                                                   .       i i  i t i i                  i 1

i l i e i 1 i t i i i

                        .)           j                                                   !           !    I       .                i (m                    M Qu' I       !                !

40 ,t a i I I p 4 t I t l i f , e v k%% l

                                                           !       I      l   l          I l l l                  l    t     i     4    l    1   f g

i }(g - i i , , J , , . , , , , , , , . , , , I i

• i i i l ' ' 4 I I I k l 1 ( I l l l } f , 4 b', e i i < , i lh h

y l m g .u 4 i i

                                                                   ' i i

1 1 5 1 i i i e m e l  : A i 1 i  ! i I t  ! I r  ! l , 8 e l I e I l 4 e { 4 i l I t e

                                 'I            j l l       l    l  l l 1                                                     I     l    l               l  8 I l j            l_ e                       I         a I                          '

I I I n - I  !

  .I.                   :

i __i , I - 1 i I th l I i l l 1 .i i l i t i i i i - , i IA i m. ll ' ' 8 ' i l f I I i !  ! I i

                                                                                                                                                              . I !

I l I 9  ; l l

      .i;                 .

j

      -                                                                        l            ,         .                                                         ,
                       ,I I
      -6               ,

i f

                                            . - - . . .                . . .                    --, - . - - .                   a,unanau,,,,,

o a

w. .

4 i

                                                                                                  . Lists and Sumaries of Coments i

• Broken Down By the Following Categories:

4 2 Group 1 - Reactor Facilities 1 Group 2 - States ,  ; 1 { Group 3 - Materials i i I S

 !                                                                                                                                                                                                        . i i
 )

i I t I 1 I

c o o i*

i' Group 1 l List of Reactor Facility Licensees. Licensee i Representatives. Consultants and Private i Cittren Cocmenters and Summary of the Coments i Atomic Industrial Forum. Inc. t . Baltimore Gas and Electric Company i Bishop. Liberinan Cook, Purcell & Reynolds  ; Carolina Power & Light Company 4 Comonwealth Edison l Conner & Wetterhahn, P.C. } Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. , 1 .. Consumers Power Company i Dairyland Power Cooperative Edison Electric Institute 1 Goodman, Lynne l KMC, Inc. i i Louisiana Power & Light ' l Mississippi Power & Light Company 1 National Rural Electric Cooperation Association-f j Newman & Holtzinger, P.C. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Pennsylvania Power and Light Company l

                                . Philadelphia Electric Company

} Portland General Electric Coepany Public Service Company of Colorado

Scientists and Engineers for Secure Energy, Inc.

i Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge l

O O l'. . 2 Southern California Edison Company '- Virginia Power

                                                                                               ~

Washington Public Power Supply System l Wisconsin Electric Power Company Wisconsin Public Service Corporation

                                      .      Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.

Yankee Atomic Electric Company

                                        . Yankee Atomic Electric Company j           .

i .i 9 i l .... l i l l 4 4 l l

      .. - - . -       - . .   - . - -    ._=   .       .    -.                     . . - - - - -                       _ _ .  - _
                                                                                                                                                  ^

O O 1 'f , l l Facilities Coments k j 1. Barton 2. Cowan i i Atomic Industrial Forum. Inc.

The proposed rule should be withdrawn and re-propose revisions  ;

I. which are legally permissible. I The proposed rule raises complex questions of constitutional law , and policy and important questions of equity among licensees. The proposal will be viewed by the courts as an unconstitutional tax. . l Neither the Budget Reconciliation Act nor the legislative history authorize the NRC to promulgate regulations in violation of the  ! l principal holding of the court cases that fees may be charged only 1 for specific services rendered to identifiable recipients. At a  ! 2 minimum, the Comission's proposal to charge licensees for costs t associated with research and generic licensing activities is i clearly prohibited. To proceed with these revisions on a path l c1darly in conflict with applicable statutory and case law is a j - mistake. - j The abbreviated coment period is both unwise and unwarranted.  ! j Urges the Comission to look favorably upon requests for more time i and to extend the due date for filing of public coments. 1 i 2. Joseph A. Tiernan. Vice President Nuclear Energy Baltimore Gas and Electric Company j Endorses coments of Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge. . l The proposed annual fees amount to a unconstitutional tax. Congress did not grant such taxing authority to the NRC. Fees must , be related to specific services provided to specific individuals or i . companies. Fees must reflect no more than the costs of providing ' such services. Fees should not be used as a revenueraising device i to finance services to the public at large or other groups broader ' 1 than the particular individual paying the fee. The NRC should i withdraw the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

3. Joseph B. Knotts, Jr., Attorney I Bishop. Libeman. Cook. Purcell & Reynolds (on beha'1f of 13 reactor '

l licensees) ! Requests an extension of the comment period to allow parties time i to supplement their comments. Alternatively, requests the ' 1 Comission stay the effective date of the rule to allow parties to

;                          seek judicial review.                                                                                                 ;

1 i_,_____.___._.~__.____._._.._._ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ - _ , _ . - . . . . _

o o . t 2 l The Commission should withdraw the proposed rule and pre'pare a l draft rule which assesses fees based upon individual licensee and  ; i applicant costs and the value. , The proposed rule is invalid on four bases: I 1. It is unconstitutional. It would tax power reactor licensees l J on a per capita basis without showing that these charges are  ;

comensurate with the value of services rendered. This -

contradicts the Supreme Court's mandate that as a matter of , consitutional law, user fees must reflect the value of j j services provided to the individual regulated industry. l , 2. The proposed rule is an unreasonable, discriminatory applica-  ! J tion of the Budget Reconciliation Act. The statute requires  ! l the NRC to charge fees that are reasonably related to specific regulatory services and fairly reflect the cost. There is no l 1 attempt to show how the costs relate to individual licensees i or applicants. It will penalize utilities with good perfor-i mance records and benefit those to whom disproportionate

                                         ~

resources are devoted. The proposed fee structure shifts many  : millions of dollars in research to and among licensees or  ! applicants who do not receive corresponding value. This is , j not reasonable decision-making. If annual fees are charged, t they should be collected on a quarterly basis. Agrees with Comissioner Bernthal that the good utilities will pay for the  ; , mistakes of the bad. ,

3. The Budget Act does not require recovery of one-third of the 1

         -                          Agency's budget through fees; instead it caps any such fees at i                                    that level subject to the requirement that a fee reasonably                       t i                                    relate to the service and fairly,.v.tflect the cost.                              i
                                                                      <-                                             l l                            4.      NRC failed to meet is obligation under the Administrative                         '

Procedures Act in issuing the rule. It failed to provide the i data on which the proposed rule is premised and it has failed to provide notice sufficient to afford interested parties a i l reasonable opportunity to participate in the rulemaking j

process.

4. S. R. Zimerman, Manager ,

! Nuclear Licensing Section  ; i Carolina Power & Light Company l \ ! Opposes new rule. Proposed user charges resemble more of a tax than a fee. Fees are charged for specific services rendered to specific individuals or companies. The proposed charges would be 'I used to raise revenue from selected users to finance services to the public at large. It does not appear that NRC has the legal ! authority to impose annual charges to recover 33% of its budget. j All licensees should be charged. pasearch costs should not be

included in determining the fees.

l

4 O O  ! 3 l 4  :

                                                                                                                                                                                                     '        i Favors the Alternative Approach if non-essential costs (i.e.,                                                                                                           i research budget) are excluded.                                                                                                                                          l 1

5. Dennis L. Farrar. Director of Nuclear Licensing j t

Connonwealth Edison i

The proposed fees are not authorized by the Consolidated Omnibus l l Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985 because they do nnt fairly i i reflect the cost to the C'ommission of providing the regulatory  !

!                                     service. The NRC can charge only for services provided. There is                                                                                                        I no doubt that NRC's research program does not provide services to                                                                                                        .

j licensees for the purpose of the Budget Act. Research is to

provide NRC a technical basis to support its regulatory program. l l

Even if the NRC would include research, the flat fee per reactor is  ;

;                                     not reasonably related to the service provided. The service                                                                                                             -

! provided does not increase in direct proportion to the number of l reactors operated. This is because a research-related service can . j be provided only once to a licensee. A licensee which operates two , i similar units does not receive double the service realized by the  !

                 --                   operator of a single unit. Thus the flat fee structure is contrary                                                                                                      ,

j to law. The proposal is also contrary to law as it assesses fees 1 on only selected licensees. It is also arbitrary and capricious of NRC not to assess fees against materials licensees. Believes that

!                                     4 CFR 102 does not authorize the NRC to charge interest and                                                                                                             >

penalties.

                                 *6. Troy B. Conner, Jr., Attorney                                                                                                                                          j j-                                      Conner & Wetterhahn, p.C. (on behalf of 3 licensees)

The proposed rule imposes charges withdut regard to specific i benefits provided and constitutes illegal levy of taxes. Specific  ! aspects of the proposal are arbitrary, capricious and discrimina- .' tory. The proposal charges for research, generic licensing . j activities, standards development and safeguards, which do not.  ;

provide benefits to any licensee / applicant.  ;

i l The rule would also impose charges for certain reactors which have

very few if any services rendered by the NRC during the year for i which the charge is assessed (e.g., a reactor outage for repairs, modification or refuelir.g).

l l The proposed rule would exclude any charge for regulatory services 1 rendered in conjunction with CP reviews and preliminary and final r design reviews; violates rights under Due Process Clause of the ! Fifth Amendment. No rational basis is discussed for omitting ! charges for these services. I i

   -.   ,--,-,..__---.-.,...,n-.          . . ~ . - - . _ , - . . - , - .        _ _ . - , , , - ~ . . - , , . , - - . ~ , - - . - - , - - . _ . - - - , , , . _ . . - . - - - - . - . - _ - - _ _ -

  - .-       . -.         .-.- - ... -_~                               ..     .-          .            -        .             . -   . -- -   ---   -. ,

L-a o o-i'

• j 4 i

i, i j The preposed rule would eliminate the Comission's carefally

itemized fee schedule under Part 170 which resulted from lengthy '

i rulemaking and was jedicially approved by the U.S. Court of Appeals. Statements in support of the proposed schedule do not

justify jettisoning the present schedule which achieves at least a .

! rough degree of equity among NRC licensees. Part 170 already meets [ I the criteria of the Act.  ! Agrees with Constissioner Roberts that charges may be made if the '! i ) service performed is a condition of the license, the service must l confer special benefits, and the service must have identified  ; 1 beneficiaries... ,

                                                                                                                                                         \

Does not support Part 171 or any of its alternatives.

7. John D. O'Toole Vice President l

j Consolidated Edison Cowany of New York. Inc.  ! l The comme'nt period of July 16, 1986, is inappropriate, unreasonable l l . and unfair. The short coment period will effectively preclude j Con-Ed from analyzing and consenting upon the factual, legal and i policy issues underlying the proposed rule. Request the Comission  : to extend the coment period so that a minimum of 30 days is  ; provided for coment. t 1

8. John D. O'Toole, Vice President l I

] *

Consolidated Edison Company of New Yo,_, . 3 f Endorses coments submitted by Shaw, Pittman, Potts and Trowbridge,  !

and Bishop, Libeman, Cook, Purcell and,  ;- Reynolds. l The Comission should withdraw and redraft its proposed rule to I i comport to constitutional requirements and judicial precedent. ( i l The proposed fees are taxes, not fees, and may only be imposed by Congress. The Comission may charge'c..ly for costs which provide

                                                                                                                                         '                l j

specific, substantial and direct benefits to the licensees against { ! whom the fees are assessed. The rule, by attempting to include i generic costs, is far wide of the mark, j )

• l The Budget Reconciliation Act (BRA) provides that the Comission l 1 assess fees which "may not exceed" 33 percent of the budget. i

! tion for the aggre-  ! Comission shculd provide gate amount of license fees assessed, rather t a reasoned justific)han uncritically  : charging the maximum pemitted.  ! i l ! i 1 l

                                                                                                                                                          }

i t . _ _ . - ,-. - ._ __ ,- _. _ __ -.,_ . _ .~..__ _ .. _ _ - __ _ _ _ _ _.. .... - _ i

h 0 0 , i

l. 1 5  ;

w Comission would not be carrying out the clear intetit of BRA were

• it to teminate or suspend collections under Part 170. Congress

! made it clear that the annual charges were to be "added to oth6r i

amounts collected" by the NRC. It was the intent of C6ngress that i

NRC not abandon an in-place and effective method of fee ecliection i which satisfied constitutional standards for fee collection:.  ; ' To afford equal protection of the laws, the NRC must allocate fees J on an equitable basis among all of its licensees. - Many of the NRC costs do not even satisfy the standard that ceiarges i be " reasonably related to the regulatory service provided". This '

is nowhere more evident than with the Office of Research. Research into optimal pressure vessel welds may be of great value to

                             ~

l t { prospective N515 vendors, but are of no value to licensees of ( 1 existing plants whose vessels wem welded years ago. Pipe cracking ', j research may benefit certain BWR licensees but is of little if any ~ value to PWRs. Safety criteria for future plants henefit only future plants. The benefits, if.any of seismic hazards will in3re j only to those sites actually studied. The internal NRC budgeting i 1 procedures do nct lend themselves to a justifiable assessment of ' who receives what regulatory service. ) The Comission should explicitly provide that units Whose authority to operate have been permanently Yevoked (Indian Pnint 1) are not  ! covered by the proposed rules.aking. l 9. Frederick W.' Buckman, Vice President ! Nuclear Operations

• J
• l Consumers Power Compa g .

.~

! Concurs with Coa,vnissioners Bernthal and Rcherts regardin6 the basis i for applying 'a user fee. 19andated annual fees will lead to i burgeoning regulation. , Alternative 2, where the annual fee will be collected based on the l power level in themal megawatts, thould be adopt.ed. A sir.gle t ' uniform annual charge t.s proposed would result in en uconomit  ; i penalty being imposed on older, s'maller plants (e.g., Big Rock 1 i Plant, Lacrosse, etc.) such that it would tecome ureconimdtel f6r ,

                                  ' hem to continue. If Alternative 2 is not adopted. .Some nther l                                   .

l

rmula which accounts for the author 12t;d power level should be l

used. j I

i i i ,

0 O i 6

10. James W. Taylor, General Manager Deirvland Power Cooperative ,

Ocpc>es adoption of proposed rule and Alternative 3 because of the t burden upon smell comercial reactors. Smaller reactors sight be grouped into a special categcry such as research and test reactors to recognize their uniqueness and need for spccial relief from

per.aric and broad applicetloa cf vales. A cost of 51 nillicn in

ant.ual fees representing a ten-fold increase for regulatory 1 services for a small, high cost predaction facility which contri-butes 8.5T of our total steam prcduction, will further sggravate  ; financial prcblems for oar consumer members. ravers Alterngtive 2 usirg installed electrical capacity rather  !

than thersel capacith Notes that no provision exists to pemit  ;

licensps havity special circumstances to seek relfef tnrough . exemptions. Because of inequitable assessr.ent of fees which might , result for the small reactors, licensees shculd have the oppor-

tuoity to seek an appropriate exempt status from the full require- l ments of tne rule. . i

! 11. John J. Kearney, Senior Vice President . 4 . Edison Electric Institute (members operate 65 reactors with 16 rore . under cor.struction)  : The NRC should withdraw the prcposed annaal fees and adopt one ewese of 1ction which solves the problem of Part 171. The fees  ;

e assessGd under Part C0 should be recasted to an annual fee system without increasing total fee cellections. Fees should be ecliected ,

in installments over the year, j.,- ! Proposad annual fees are an un:onstitutional tax. Notwithstanding deficit-reduction pressures, the NRC cannot abdicate its i responsibili:.y tc comply with cons +.itutinnal obligations.. , \ ' ! Apart from tt;e constitutional requirements, the prngosed annual fees fail to meet the language of Section 7601 which states that t annual charges "shall be reasonably related tc the regulatory service provided by the Comission end shall fair'ay reflect the - cost to the Comission of providing such service". Basic equity t and fairness demands that if some of these subject to NRC

regulation era Doing to bear the cost of such regulation 411 of i those subject to tnat regulation should pay their fair there, ,

i including DOE for their low-level waste disposal facility. Agrees with Comissioner Bernthat that a flat fee provides the wreng incentives for licensees. i I

4 I

i .

   ,_     _ _ _ _ .                   _ - _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . - _ . , _ _ . _ - , ~ . _ . . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ , _ , _ _ ~ . _ .

               . . -        -.               -.          . .           .     ~ .                         ...                    .       ..     .-         .        - - .      .. .. .                          . . .           . -

O O l t 7 . i i The sharply incraased fee eclicctions would put an unfa[r burden on the esclear industry. While ruclear power reactors may be an j appealing " deep pocket" to some seeking budget / deficit relief, the extra $100 million per year in fees is simply inequitable. . l 12. Lynne Goodman

;                                        Lacrosse,WI                                                                                                                                                                               ,

Strongly objects to the short coment period. Feels all licensees should pay for the NRC services they request. Licensees should not have to pay for NAC-initiated work. Proposed rule will have significant impact on those utilities that operate smaller reactors ' like Big-Rock Point and Lacrosse. A study was performed in 1981 by Sandia Labs for the NRC. It 'recorsanded that the NRC reduce the i ti.ne spent on the five smallest reactors based on consequences of i en accider.t. Thus small reactors should not have to pay the same

;                                        fee as large reactors. Agrees with views of Comissioners Roberts and Bernthal and to some extent Comissioner Zech.
                                                        ?-          .

13. Dorald F. Knutn, President KMC. Inc. (Nuclear Consultant) ,

I The NRC staff consumed 90 days in preparation of the proposed rule l and has permitted r.o time for any meaningful review or coment by those impacted by the rule. This effort is indicative that the NRC ,. will not sertously entertain meaningful coments, rather its only r,oal is to fulfill an administrative requirement. The manner in i which this proposed rule has been maraged appears to be extremely

             -                            arbitrary. The proposed rule contains a uniform tax regardless of

the benefit the utility receives from the NRC.

;                                         There is ample regulatcry precedent for consideration of alternate                                                                                                                       ;

4 i non-unifom on vehicle weight " tax" carrying arrangements capacity (e.g)., highday if taxing" utility taxes on trucks based operators , ,' is NRC's objective. ,, j hecomends extension of the coment period to a minimum of 30 days

• l

' and that titernative approacnes to determining fees are given

,                                          serious consideration.
;                            14.           G. W. Muench Acting' Director Nuclear Operations Lcuisient Power & Licht J                                           Proposed rulemaking does not appropriately assess fees for services rendered. Rulenaking should cor. sider all licensees (e.g., vendors,                                                                                                                   ;

! AE's, test reactors and weste repositories). Agrees in part with i  ! 1 1

   ---e1- , .    ,-y,,,y ,     .,.---~,9        % -t-..     -,,,,a%      m,,--,     ,.frw....w..,,.-,---%-.#m.-.,--.-.-,.,,,,,m                     ,..-c--e.,--,,        . ~  u%.    --- .s-w-, , , , , , - , . , , . , -. ,-

O O _ 8 Comissioner Bernthal that all recipients of NRC services should be - assessed a fee. A modified version of Alternative 3 is most desirable. The Comission must show that satting a flat fee per reactor would be in accordance with the proportionate share of services received by-each reactor.

15. O. D. Kingsley, .Ir. , Vice President Nuclear Operations Mississippi pov'er_4 Light Company

                                                                      ~

1 Concurs with coments made by Bishop. Liberman, Cook, Purcell and Reynolds. -l Endorses the provisico in the proposed rule exempting from payment of annual. fees those utilities who have recuested suspension of NRC l reviews (e.g., Grar.d Gulf 2). Mcwever, KRC should make clear that any costs associated with suspended OL applications are based on i . individual licensee.and applicant costs and the value of NRC services to the individual if censee/ applicant. Objects to proposal of one lump sum at the start cf the fiscal year thus depriving licensecs of needed assets. Suggests a quarterly assessment of annual fees, j I6. Rcbert Berg 1'and, Executive Vice President National Rural Electric Cooperation Association r ndorses and supports the coments of.Dairyland Power Cooperative and Atomic Industrial Forum. The new charge is a tax, not a user fee and would impose a disproportionate financial burden spon a relatively small .' comercial power reactor (Lacrosse). Also, the comment period should be exter.ded.

17. Harold F. Reis. Attorney

;                                               hewan & Holttinger, p.C. (on behalf of Florida Power Houston j                                               Lighting, IU inois Power and Iowa Electric) i Protests the sobreviated coment period.

i Objects to the NRC having converted Congress' direction to collect annual charges which must be reasonably related to the regulatory service provided by the Comission into an unconstitutional tax upon licensees. i

     . ,. _ . . _ . _ . - . _ _ _ . . _ _ . . , _ . . . , . _ . _ . _ _             . _ _ _       , . . _ ~ .     - . , - - . . . , . - _ _ . _          _- , . _ . _

O O 4 9 i j The Comission has not analyzed the differing impact of some cf its regulatory activities on different licensees. For example, PWP.'s .

;                                                         and BWR's are two types of reactors in operation. They have                                                    i 1                                                         different characteristics such as containment and much of the i                                                          research benefits only one of the types. There are aspects of the                                              ;

research activity which bear mainly upon advanced reactors. Yet

the NRC proposes to assess current licensees and applicants annual fees based on the costs of the entire research program.

l The NRC requires that the annual fee be paid in advance. It is difficult to comprehend how such advance payment for services could be characterized as a fee rather than a tax. - i Agree with Comissioner Bernthal that all entities which derive a benefit should share the cost. , I The proposed rule invites comments on an Alternative Approach to

;                                                         assessment of fees. The alternative does no more than slightly l                                                          reduce that tax.
               ,..                      16. James D. Shiffer, Vice President
!                                                         Nuclear Power Generation Pacific Gas and Electric Company Endorses coments submitted by Bishop. Liberman, Cook, Purcell and Reynolds.

! The Humboldt Bay reactor is permanently shut down and will be i .- decomissioned once approval is issued by NRC. It should be clear i that the proposed fees for plants which cannot operate are not

   -                                                       reasonable or warranted. PGAE requesta that the language of the rule specifically exclude such a plant from user foes. As proposed, the rule does not categorically exclude nuclear power j                                                           reactors which are in the process of being decomissioned.                                               ,

Advance payment of the large annual fee at the beginning of t'he j fiscal year is not justified, and quarterly installment payments should be considered. l

19. H. W. Keiser Vice President .

i Nuclear Operations Pennsylvania Power and Light Company l j Does not believe that the proposed fees will stand if challenged in i the courts. The only scheme that equates fees with service i i provided is the one in the existing Part 170 where licensees are  ; billed for actual hours expended by NRC. Thus PP&L favors l l

4 O O l l 10 i y . i retention of Part 170 without additional fees since additional fees cannot be reasonably related to the regulatory services provided. t l

.                        If additional fees are to be collected to recover 335 of the
 !                       budget, PP&L believes fees should be equally assessed against all

licensees and applicants.

l 20. John 5. Kemper, Vice-President { Engineering and Research i i Philadelphia Electric Company 1 Coment period too short to permit a meaningful analysis. Should be renoticed with more extensive coment period; requests that j extended coment' period be provided. . ! Costs among the various licensees should be more equitable. l Factors such as fee in relationship to size of the reactor and/or

the level of regulatory activity associated with the individual j reactor should. be considered.

None of the alternatives provide for payment of fees by recipients of"special"NRCregulatoryreviews(e.g.,reviewofanewgeneric reactor concept). To include fees for special" regulatory j services would reduce " regular users" costs and serve the national interest by assuring that the regulatory review necessary before the new concept can be developed commercially is funded.

21. Bart D. Withers, Vice President, Nuclear J

       -                  Portland General Electric Comoany                                                      .

l An increase in fees under Part 170 would be more appropriate. Fees  ! i charged should be connensurate with the services received. That ! does not necessarily mean that the fees should be proportionate to ! the size of the plant or the amount of electricity generated but should be proportional to the regulatory services received. .. j Payment of a standard flat fee does not allow for cost control by either the licensee or NRC. It would be more ap 'l establish a license fee scale which permits the.propriate MRC and the to l licensee to work together to control costs. The proposal does not give equitable treatment to all licensees. Certain materials licensees require regulatory support but would ! not be paying their fair share of NRC costs. NRC is required to j collect annual charges from all licensees pursuant to the Atomic l Energy Act. Part 170 should continue to be implemented although specific fees l , should be updated to reflect current costs. l l

                                                                                                                                                                   \

j. .

9 9 , o ,j i 6 s

)

jj 5, 4 J {

                                                                                                                                    -                                               i4 l                                       22.             H. L. Brey, Manager                                                                                                               r5 Nuclear Licensing & Fuels Division                                                                                                (

i Public Service Company of Colorado

• l I

l Supports Comissioner Bernthal's position that all beneficiaries i should be required to contribute to the costs of NRC efforts. A g i simplistic method of collecting fees in lieu of a more equitable, /:

                                                                                                                                                                                                       ,p           1 i                                                       method of fee collection is arbitrary. Licensees should be .                                         '

assessed fees according to the services provided and not asse'ssed l, {'I i ' i arbitrary fees as proposed. However, endorses Alternative 2 which l assesses a fee.upon.the reactors based on themal megawatts. ) gi 1 3 s ,

;                                       23. James P. McGranary, Jr., Counsel                                                                                            ,               i r

i '

l. Scientists and Engineers for Secure Energv. Inc. p The Budget Recor;iif son Act does not permit the Comission to 'i I '

exclude any c*.a's 04 ii:ense from fees. Rule is in violation of l$ law since it f;lls to consider other amounts collected by the NRC *ti ' j - (e.g., fines, interest, penalties) in the 33% calculation. Feels j that the "Act" requires NRC to impose additional charges upon e licensees rather than the dismantlement of the current Part 170. . Proposed rule takes an overly simplistic and broad approach to the . concept of costs " reasonably" related to the regulatory service provided. , l  ; + , y. i l 24. Jay Silberg, Attorney f  ; i 1

       -'                                                 Shaw. Pittman. Potts & Trowbridge (on behalf of 18 utilities)                                                                                             ,

To comply with the Congressional mandate the Comission should i withdraw the proposed rule. It should recast its current fee

!                                                         system to involve annual charges without increasing the total i                                                         amount of fee collections and providing for payment in                                                                                 .

installments. This is the only alternative consistent with a,11 of < l

} the NRC's legal responsibilities, statutory and constitutional. , i l The proposed annual fees clearly amount to an unconstitutional tax i under prevailing Court rulings. 1i I Apart from the constitutional problems, the proposed annual fees . fail to comply with the express requirements of Section 7601. t '

,                                                         While the statute requires that annual fees be assessed all                                                                               +

i licensees, many licensees are excluded from payment of any fees. . l -

                                                                                                                                                                                           ;,           1 1:
                                                                                                                                                                                              ,/                    i O'

I

W7 I . p

      ,1 y

1 j

                                                              \
                                                                                     ;o                                   o                                  .
                                             >^                   s                             12
                                       +

4 p s . !$ In Aetemining the maximum fees which can be charged, the NRC fails f to'take into account all the other amounts collected (e.g., civil

                        /                                    penalties, work for other Federal agencies, etc.) as required by t/P' i
                            '),'                f Section 7601. The proposed new fees will potentially exceed the statutory minimum with no provisions for refunds or interest.-

h' ' l .

p- / The cost basis for the annual fees includes elements such as j 3 6, general research which are not reasonably related to the costs of regulating nuclear and materials licenses. 3 - Agress with Comissioner Roberts that certain costs should be f i 1 excluded in any. proposed fee ' schedule. Y N\( (' 3

25. M., C. Medford, Manager j c Puclear Licensing ,

Southern California Edison Company i-Endorses c.oments submitted by Bishop. Libeman, Cook, Purcell and

            ' t, gA                                              Reynolds.'           -

I Cpposes proposed rule as it arbitrarily and inequitably assesses - j, i fees without consideration of the use of the regulatory resources.

                                           ,                  Based upon SALP ratings, a " good" licensee would be subsidizing NRC l                                     )                        activities at a " poor" licensee facility. The current fee system i

assesses fees based on actual usage of regulatory resources. SCE suggests that the current fee schedules be reevaluated and applied ![ / to generate the NRC-required income. p , 1 -

                   '[

l

                                                            ,Oojects to research budget of $104 million included as chargeable 1

1 regulatory services. The Themal Hydraulics Transients research i i program with a budget of $17.5 million,is tasked with the development of accident analysis computer codes. The accident i s, analyses for existing licensed plants and applicants have, in

           .'t            .                                   general, been perfomed, reviewed and licensed, and further

d. '

? ,' > reanalyses are not required. . Agrees with Comissioner Roberts' view that the regulated funding i - ,', involves a conflict of interest. h0,/ The proposed rule represents a four-fold increase in fees which cannot be considered to be " modest" as suggested in the Notice. ' ! '. ," g N i Us 26. S. L. Stewart

                      ;                                        Virginia Power

\

          )4                                                   Encourages NRC to seek a more equitable alternative to that                                          l

!/' proposed. The proposed fixed fee for power reactor applicants and , I f , h, ' \ i _.._._. 2-_._.._._.__. _ _ .._ _ _._ _,_._.._ _

O Q

                                                       '13 n                                                    s licensees,whilesimplifyingNRCaccounting,mayresultIna significant discrepancy between actual costs incurred and fees      -

assessed for a specific reactor unit. Suggests fees be based, in part, on licensed reactor power output. Shares the concerns of , Comissioners Zech, Bernthal and Roberts in fairly allocating costs. The method used to allocate fees should be flexible enough to more fairly reflect actual costs.1 Fees should include non-power expenditurer (e.g., waste disposal). Finds the alternative , proposal only slightly more preferable.

27. G. L. Sorensen, Manager Regulatory Program 0 Washiniton Public Power Supply System Endorses coments submitted by Bishop, Libeman, Cook, Purcell and Reynolds. 3 Proposed ruleLis unconstitutionel and would impose an extreme hardship on these OL applications'that are inactive (e.g. WPPSS 1

         .         and3). Such a drastic increase in fees with no corresponding                  -

increase in level of effort or benefit to the projects would cause us to seriously consider the elimination _of all NRC review in order to forego the user fse. Rather than following the approach in the proposed rule, the i Comission must allocate fees on a services-rendered basis to each

             -      recipient of the service. Failure to do so is especially hamful in the case of relatively inactive deferred plants.
                                                                  ~

A more reasonable alternative approach to relatively inactive l applications would be for the applicant and the NRC to agree upon a

budget prior to the beginning of each fiscal year. Year-end ~ s adjustments could be made to reflect services actually requested and received. ,,

28. C. W. Fay, Vice President Nuclear Power Hisconsin Electric Power Company Proposed rule is unfair and fails to treat all licensees on an equitable basis. Such a fee schedule does not recognize the varying costs associated with regulating different types of licensees. If fees are to reflect the cost of the reguietory i service, the NRC must provide a more realistic schedule than the proposed flat fee. Legal precedent suggests that the an1ual fees represent an unconstitutional tax. Fee structure under Part 171 or '

existing Part 170 should be abolished; the cost for regulating

n - O O - l-14 should be supported by the Federal budgetary and collect'fon process. The benefit is to the NRC and general public in .that regulations are to assure that licensed operations are being

• carried out in a manner that provides for protection of the public health and welfare. Comments on the proposal were requested in an extraordinarily short time.

29. D. C. Hintz, Manager Nuclear Power Wisconsin Public Service Corporation Comment period *of 15 days precludes sound analysis and i partici~pation from the public. This seems unjustifiable considering the magnitude and speed with which this issue will impact.

Proposed rule is not equitable since not all entities share in the cost recopery. In addition, no distinction is made between reviews conducted for various reactor types (PWR, BWR, HTGR), NSSS

       ,'         suppliers or loop configuration (2 loop vs. 4 loop). Under Part 171 PWR owners would be required to pay for issues specific to BWR         -

reactors; for example, the issue of BWR Mark 1 containment integrity. Monthly or quarterly payments should be considered rather than one lump sum payment. Both good and bad performers would pay an equal amount in the area of inspection fees. Agrees with Comissioner Roberts' that all beneficiaries should share in NRC costs; vendor topical reports should not be exempt from charges. Too much of the research budget is duplication of industry efforts. While confirmatory research may be necessary, it is desirable to minimize duplicate efforts. NRC couTd'be just as effective as an independent reviewer of private research. The possibility exists that public utility comissions would disallow duplicate research from the rate structure. ,- Endorses Alternative 2 that fees be based on the size of the reactor. There is a definite correlation between reactor size and utility revenues received as a result of operation of the unit. The equitableness of a fee schedule based on unit size has been - recognized by the Waste Policy Act in the assessment of fees on a per kilowatt hour basis. The proposed rule is critically flawed by its unfairness and untimeliness and hence does not confom to the Act.

30. Raymond R. Cristell, Executive Vice President and General Manager Wolverine Power Supply Cooperative, Inc.

Opposes rule because it adds another financial burden upon rural

O O 15 L electric generation and transmission cooperatives that maintain minority ownership in nuclear plants. They own 15 percent in Fermi 2 and would be responsible for their ownership percentage of the approximately $1.1 million percent in user fees. Proposed fee is a tax because there is no identifiable additional  ! services provided under the proposed rule. l The rule is not in the best interest of rural customers receiving electricity through Wolverine's system because consumers are , already paying electric rates that are approximately 15 percent l higher than those of investor-owned utilities and they will have to , be increased under the proposed rule.

31. Donald W. Edwards, Director Industry Affairs 2 Yankee Atomic Electric Company j Fees paid to a Government agency should be related to a specific

        .-                  service received. The proposed rule and the Alternative Approach stretches this concept beyond any reasonable interpretation and we are adamantly opposed to it.

• The drastic increase proposed in this rulemaking is not based on an increase in specific services to be provided nor does it correlate i to specifically identifiable activities conducted primarily for our

                  -         benefit. A system based on the size and complexity of reactors                       .

would be much more equitable. l As an absolute minimum, fees should be collected in monthly or quarterly installments. ,' The proposed rule perpetrates an arbitrary and capricious tax which raises serious constitutionality questions which could not survive a fonnal legal challenge. .-

32. James E. Tribble. President and Chief Executive Officer Yankee Atomic Electric Company Fee rule should be revised to make the fee paid per unit proportional to the licensed rating.

Increased costs of meeting new requirements are escalating the  ! costs of operating small reactors so high that it is rapidly  ! becoming uneconomical. 2 i l

O O i Group 2 List of State Commenters and Sumary of the Coments'- Alabama Department of Public Health - Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency Arkansas Department of Health Colorado, State of Colorado Department of Health Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety Iowa Health Department l

                            ' Kansas Department of Health and Environment
       .'                     Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality                               l
               ~

Maine Department of Human Services Ma'ssachusetts Department of Public Health Nebraska Department of Health Nevada Department of HumanJesources New York State Department of Environmental Conservation i North Dakota Department of Health .- Oregon Department of Human Resources Organization of Agreement States ! Rhode Island Department of Health Tennessee Department of Health and Environment Utah Department of Health Washington Department of Social and Health Services

l j' . O O States Comments -

1. Claude Earl Fox, M.D., State Health Officer ,

Alabama Department of Public Health Supports Alternative 1. It is the fairest since reactor and materials licensees pay their fair share. It offers better enforcement in that problem licensees are charged for non-routine  ; inspections.

2. Charles F. Tedford, Director -

Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency Strongly prefers the Alternative Approach where materials licensees continue to pay. The removal of materials license fees establishes a nonviable ' precedent for many of the Agreement States that are firmly

      '.-              committed to the fee system.

3. Grata J. Dicus, Acting Director Division of Radiation Control

, Arkansas Department of Health

                  -    Supports Alt'ernative 1 which would retain Part 170. Current proposal impacts on the Agreement States too heavily. In a tire of
   -                   budgetary crisis, having Part 170 fees eliminated for the materials program could easily undercut the efforts of states to continue to collect fees. In the case of Arkans.aS; this could prove to be an obstacle in trying to implement a fee schedule.

4. Richard D. Lamm, Governor Colorado, State of Strongly opposes the proposed rule. With the adoption of the rule, Colorado would be faced with the loss of base funding for its radiation control program. "The result of the Commission's proposal would be the termination of the NRC/ Colorado agreement of 18 years."

Strongly urges the Commission to act on the Alternative Approach in which all licensees and applicants pay fees. i

                                      'O                                    O 2

5. Thomas M. Vernon, M.D., Executive Director Colorado Department of Health The result of the adoption of this proposed rule by the NRC would undoubtably result in the termination of Agreement State status for the State of Colorado as well as a number of other Agreement States.

Believes proposed rule is discriminatory and unjust. A more appropriate approach is the Alternative Approach where all licensees would pay fees.

6. JohnEure, Chairman Conference of Radiation Control Proaram Directors, Inc.

Supports the Alternative Approach where all beneficiaries of NRC licenses pay fees. Opposes the proposed rule because it is contrary.to the intent of Section 274 of the Atomic Energy Act and the desire of Congress to allow states to assume certain regulatory authority for radioactive material under agreement with the Commission. Also, the proposed rule (1) is inequitable because it places the financial burden of the fee recovery program on about 181 licenses, and (2) will have a severe impact on Agreement States whose fees are tied to the Commission's fee schedule for materials licenses. If states return their agreements to NRC, they would i lose some or all of their abilities for emergency response. Such

          .       action affects power facilities since their licenses are tied to off-site emergency planning and response programs which in turn require adequate state and local emergency response capability.

7. Terry R. Lash, Director .,..

Illinois Department of Nuclear Safety  ; Strongly opposes NRC's adoption of such an unfair fee schedul,e. The proposed fee schedule which assesses only power reactors and uranium fuel cycle facilities would have serious and far-reaching deleterious consequences for Illinois and other states as well as , l the NRC. Illinois .a potential Agreement State', probably could not l propose to collect fees from licensees who would not be subject to fees under the NRC's proposed schedule. As a result, Illinois and l l I other potential states would not be financially able to take on the l responsibilities of regulating materials licenses. Illinois feels that each category of license should bear its fair share so that all licensees who benefit from the NRC's services are treated equitably. Urges the adoption of a more equitable and less disruptive schedule of fees such as reflected in the Alternative Approach. If the proposed rule is adopted, there undoubtedly would be pressure to return regulatory responsibility to NRC from l l

           =A   -          m.                                .- ,       ,

w. _

O LO 3 Agreement States. New Mexico has already returned mill tailings to the NRC for economic reasons. The discontinuance of fees would drastically reduce Illinois' effectiveness in assuring the siting of needed new low-level radioactive waste disposal facilities in the State.

8. Mary L. Ellis, Comissioner of Public Health Iowa Health Department Iowa, the newest Agreement State, strongly opposes the proposed fee schedule. Abolishment of the material license and inspection fees would seriously deopardize the centinuation of the Iowa-NRC ,

agreement since Iowa has adopted a fee system identical to that of the NRC. Iowa legislation does not pennit charging fees in excess of the amcunts charged by the NRC. Concurs with the Alternative Approach where all beneficiaries of NRC services pay fees.

         .          9. David J. Romano, Manager Bureau of Air Quality and Radiation Control Kansas Department of Health and Environment Takes strong exception to the proposal. It was not addressed to the Agreement States. Kansas is attempting to develop a fee system
                  -      again, partly due to NRC's urging. The result is that an important aspect of the U.S. NRC Agreement State relationship has been

.- reversed without adequate notice to the states or adequate time for l response. NRC excuses a majority of its licensees from fees. The  :

ability of Agreement States to have .afee program is likely to be seriously damaged by NRC's proposal." All licensees should pay fees. l

10. Donald R. Hughes, Manager .,

Radiation Control Branch Kentucky Cabinet for Human Resources NRC should seriously review their decision to eliminate the existing materials fee structure. Agreement State capability to i establish and/or maintain its present fee structure could be placed in jecpardy. f

11. William H. Spell, Administrator 1 Nuclear Energy Division Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality The effect of the new Part 171 is most acute for existing Agreement States and those seeking that status. Louisiana is facing a financial crisis. If the NRC's fees for materials licenses

 ~

10 O . 4

                                                                                             ~

disappear there may be strong, local sentiment to return the agreement to NRC. If several states return their agreements, NRC 4 could again be looking to charge fees for materials licenses. Favors the alternative approach since it would minimize the effects on all states. Also, requests an extension of time to corrent on-the complex subject matter.

12. W. Clough Toppan, Manager -

Radiological Health Program Maine Department of Human Services FavorsYheAlternativeApproach. Discontinuance of materials fees puts Agreement States in an awkward position.

13. Robert M. Hallisey, Director Radiation Control Program

                                          '    ~

Massachusetts Department of Public Health Opposes the proposed Part 171. The elimination of fees for small licensees is contrary to the intent of the Budget Reconciliation Act. As a non-Agreement State which may soon seek agreement, the proposal to eliminate materials license fees concerns them greatly.

Strongly recomends adoption of the Alternative Approach which

                       .       equitably distributes the cost of NRC services among all licensees.
   .                  14. Harold R. Borchert. Director Division of Radiological Health Nebraska Department of Health Absurd to propose the elimination of materials fees since certain Agreement States use them as the basis for their fees.          ,,

Strongly urges Alternative Approach be implemented.

15. Stanley R. Marshall, Supervisor Radiological Health Section l

Nevada Department of Human Resources Suspension of Part 170 could put some Agreement State programs in , jeopardy and necessitate the relinquishing of some of the agreements.-  ! Recommends Alternative 1 as Part 170 has been a primary justifi-cation for Nevada statutes and regulations for fee assessments. l

o o 5 i i 1

c. i

16. Paul J. Merges, Ph.D.

Secretary, Comittee on Licensing Programs , New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Inappropriate for NRC to unilaterally reduce fees without

considering the impact on Agreement State programs. This proposal weakens other Agreement State programs which could affect New York State. ,

17. Dana K. Mount, P.E., Director Division of Environmental Engineering North bakota Department of Health They favor the Alternative Approach which provides that applicants for and holders of reactor operating licenses pay an annual charge similar to the one in Part 171 and that Part 170 is retained for

, all other beneficiaries of NRC services. If the proposed Part 171 is adopted, Agreement State materials licensees will lobby against

             ..             the Agreement States to suspend their fee systems.

Another consideration, Agreement State licensees may apoly for NRC licenses at no cost thereby increasing NRC's workload acd enticing business away from fee charging states.

18. Ray D. Paris, Manager Radiation Control Section

     -'                     Oregon Department of Human Resources Strongly opposes the proposed change... Change would set a precedent

, that Agreement States could not follow. Without fees, Agreement States could not carry out licensing and inspection programs. Oregon is facing a depressed econorgy and General Fund monies are . extremely limited. .. I

19. Edgar D. Bailey, Chairman t Organization of Agreement States (28 Agreement States)

Opposes the adoption of the proposed schedule because: (1) it is inequitable. It places the entire financial burden of

the fee system on reactors and fuel cycle facilities and I allows the vast majority of the Comission's licensees to receive the benefits of the NRC regulatory program free.

6 (2) it will have a significant negative impact on the p' resent Agreement States and could potentially eliminate other states from becoming Agreement States. The net result of eliminating materials license fees could be that some states would be forced to give up their Agreements and return their regulatory authority to the Comission. To have an Agreement State lose its Agreement through no fault in the quality of its program but through a fiat of a Comission's rule change is grossly unfair. The elimination of the Comission's materials license fees would certainly impede, if not totally halt, the development of new Agreement States programs. Alternative 1 is the one,.most nearly acceptable. As soon as practicable the Comission should adopt an annual fee schedule for all categories of licenses.

20. James E. Hickey, Chief -

Division of Occupational Health and Radiation Control Rhode Island Department of Health The elimination of fees for licensees regulated by the Agreement St'ates could have an adverse effect on State Radiation Control Programs. An inequity would be created for those Agreement States  ; licensees who are charged fees. Licensees will pressure the Agreement States to follow the NRC initiative. State programs which do not generate income are more vulnerable to budget 1 reductions.,

21. Charles P. West. Assistant Director Division of Radiological Health Tennessee Department of Health and Environment i Appears that Part 171 is inequitable and does not fulfill the requirements and intent of the Budget Reconciliation Act. Amending 1

Part 170 would be more equitable than proposed Part 171. ,, i Alternative 1 is the only alternative that should be initiated.

22. Larry F. Anderson, Director -

Bureau of Radiation Control

Utah Department of Health Proposed Part 171 is inequitable to licensees and creates problems I for the Agreement State program. Most Agreement State fees are based on the NRC fee schedule and if the Agreement States have to l

go to their legislatures for funds 'to support their programs, this l will tend to reverse their decision to assume Agreement State status and return the programs to NRC.

O O 7

                                                                                          \

Favors adoption of Alternative 1 which is equitable to licensees and taxpayers. Agrees with Commissioner Bernthal that the only justification for this proposal is the potential administrative savings at the expense of an equitably administered program.

23. T. R. Strong, Chief Office of Radiation Protection Washington Department of Social and Health Services Alternative proposal to maintain materials license fees at their present level is' far superior to elimination of the fees.

If HRC does not charge fees which fully recover costs in the material licensing area, at least do not . reduce the current fees. e* e e

0 O Group 3 l List of Materials Licensee Commenters and Sumary of the ComEnts Chrysler Corporation Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc. General Electric Company Kerr-McGe.e Corporation

                                                              ~~

Rio Algom Mining Corporation Westinghouse Electric Corporation i t G e a

                                                                                      ,e*

i . . 1

                     ... , - . ~ . . - , , - . .--. ..,---,..             -.                 , , . , .     .--.-n.--.    . . , . . ,, ----n,   ,,-nn,, - . , . . , .n_.

O O Haterials Comments

1. Louis Redmond, Corporate Radiation Protection Officer Chrysler Corporation ,

Favors proposal that does not bill the small materials licensee.

2. C. W. Malody, Manager Corporate Licensing Exxon Nuclear Company, Inc.

The levying of the annual fee along with removal of existing fee schedule ~has the appeal of simplicity for the NRC and the ease of budgeting for the licensee. Although the annual fee in any one year might not bear a direct relationship to cost or worth of services provided, over the tens of years most licensees will operate, any inequity would tend to disappear. Favors the proposed simplification approach to fee calculation and collection. Supports either alternative which eliminates fee collection under Part 170.

3. T. Preston Winslow, Manager Licensing & Nuclear Materials Management General Electric Company GE supports the proposed rule change as an interim measure in that it reduces the license fee administrative burden. A single annual fee for a uranium fuel fabrication license rather than the 25 payments made to the NRC during a year would save time and simplify management and administration of the fees.

! GE believes that the Government should~have a single fee policy for ! government activities; in every case where services are rendered, the policy should be the same. l It appears that the annual fee factor (51 F.R. 24085) should be .49 instead of .45. If so, the proposed 171.15(d)(1) through (5) will I I

need recalculation.

Agrees with Commissioner Roberts that for the regulated to fund the activities of the regulator is an inimical conflict of interest.

4. Edwin T. Still, Vice President and Director Environment and Health Management Division Kerr-McGee Corporation

! Generally agrees with views of Commissioners Roberts, Bernthal and ( Zech. l l l 1 i _ . - . _ . - , _ . .- - - _ , - - - , , , . . , . . _ _ _ . _ - , . _ . . , - . , _ . . . . - ~ , . - . , , . . , , , _ . -

                                                                                                                                                                                      ~
                                                              .O                                                                     O                                                  .

2 The proposed fee structure presents major inequities and seemingly was selected only on the basis of ease and convenience rather than in consideration of the amount of effort expended on a licensee. Believes fee should be comensurate with the effort expended and take into account the operating status of the facility. Sees no justification in requiring an operation on standby or in the decomissioning stage to pay the same fee as an active or expanding operation. There is no rationale for exempting the vast majority of licensees from any fee. Fails to understand why fees are not collected from test and research reactors. Opposes the arbitrary fee assessment schedule and urges considera-tion of the alt' rnative e where all benef41 aries of NRC services pay equitable fees.

5. M. D. Lawton, President -

Rio Algom Mining Corporation Supports'the method of calculation of fees in the present schedule. Experience indicates that fees under the present schedule would be

                 ~

less than the annual fee of $23,000 as proposed for a mill license. Agrees with Comissioner Roberts that for the regulated to fund the activities of the regulator is an inimical conflict of interest. .! Also agrees with Comissioner Bernthal that the good will be penalized for the ineptitude of others.  ; 1

5. A. J. Nardi, Manager

    .                             License Administration j

Westinghouse Electric Corporation .. i Agrees with the Alternative Approach and Comissioner Bernthal's i views that all NRC beneficiaries pay fees. There appears to be no j logic in excluding the smaller materials licensees from the fee " i schedules.  ; l ( i i

i .

' Y!
        /     \  o 1

0 o.m snm ' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION O l j

   ,              I                               wasHWGTON, D. C. 20585 l

5 (...../ AUG 141986 MEMORANDUM FOR: Ronald M. Smith, Staff Attorney Office of General Counsel THRU: Lars Solander, Chief f - Planning and Resource Analysis Branc M ' Planning and Program Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Carlos A. Velez, Senior Resource Analyst Planning and Resource Analysis Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

SUBJECT:

SHUT DOWN PLANTS This is in reference to our telephone conversation of Tuesday, regarding plants permanently shut down. As we discussed, there is no statutory definition.of what constitutes a plant " licensed but shut down indefinitely." i Several years ago (perhaps seven or more) the people in charge of the preparation'of the Summary Information Report, NUREG-0817 (Brown Book),  ! decided that some plants that had been shut down for a considerable time i j period, but for which the utility had not formally submitted a-decomissioning plan, should be separated from the rest. That gave birth to the " Licensed But Shut Down Indefinitely" category. T category; the cresumption is thateneral G,_MI-1 is the Public' only plant Utilities intends presently in that to clean-up and restore the reactor, ano to resume operan ons. . I have enclosed some ma'terials that I believe you will find of'value.

Enclosure 1 is a list.of plants in the shut down category, and related data, which I have manually updated. It.is a page from the Brown Book. Enclosure 2 is a paper that describes the decommissioning process and applicable regulations.

Enclosure 3 includes a memorandum responding to a question on power reactor j expiration dates and a list of all power reactors with additional pertinent j information. The reason one cannot find Hallam, Elk River, Piqua, and Bonus in this list yet they are in the Brown Book page, is that these never had l operating licenses; they were government-owned and operated by utilities under 10 CFR 115 (no longer exists) with operating authorizations. j .. 1

                                                                                                ~   .

s F-I

                                                                                                                                     ,, - l
  %    g        $.       M            /C/     t'j"M Y } f

• f

i

                                     .O                                        o
 ?

4 Please recognize that Enclosure 3 was prepared in 1985 and additions to the J list are necessary; that is why I included Enclosure 4, a listing of licensed  ; power reactors through today. Call me if I can be of further assistance on X24335. w a. dw Carlos A. Velez, Senior Resource Analyst Planning and Resource Analysis Branch Planning and Program Analysis Staff Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Enclosures:

As stated l 1 4 1

                                                                                                                                                                +

Ek j

2.26 O ENCLOSURE 1 LICENSED U.S. POWER REACTORS U.S. POWER REACTORS WITH LICENSES TERMINATED l l I l LICENSED BUT SHUT DOWN PERMANENTLY 11 INDIAN POINT 1 l CONSOLIDATED EDISON l l 21 HALLAM IPWR l 03/26/62lSPL l I CONSUMERS PUBLIC l 3l ELK RIVER

• I RURAL COOPERATIVE POWER lSGR l 08/09/62lSPL l l 41 CVTR IBWR I 11/10/62lSPL l 51 PIQUA l CAROLINAS-VIRGINIA NUCLEAR POWER l

I PIQUA MUNICIPAL UTILITIES lHWR l 11/27/62lSPL l l 6l ENRICO FERMI 1 l POWER REACTOR DEVELOPMENT 10MR l 05/16/63lSPL l l 71 PATHFINDER I NORTHERN STATES POWER lFBR l 07/11/63lSPL l l 81 BONUS l P.R. WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY IBWR l 03/12/64lSPL i l_ 91 PEACH BOTTOM 1 1 PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC lBWR l 04/02/64lSPL l NOTE: INTGRI 01/12/671SPL l SIGNIFICANT POWER LICENSE (SPL) = DVER 50% OF RATED POWER. REACTOR TYPES: . BWR - BOILING WATER REACTOR FBR - FAST BREEDER REACTOR OMR - ORGANIC-MODERATED (POWER) REACTOR PWR - PRESSURIZED WATER REACTOR - HTGR - HIGH-TEMPERATURE GAS REACTOR HWR - HEAVY WATER REACTOR SGR - SODIUM-GRAPHITE REACTOR 10 HunBOLDT BA1 PACIF/C GAS & ELECTRIC Bwg 0/27/42 fol il 3RESDEN l e C OMM 0 Af RIE ALTH EDIiscal 'N1 M BK o sjoz o pst 10/11 o FTL i J , I _ . . . _ - . . . . - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - ------A

  -               .                                                                                                   ENCLOSURE 2 i

LICENSED REACTOR DEC0PetISSIONING i REA MEETING NOVEMBER 12, 1985 , P. B. ERICKSON, U.S. NRC Introduction Deconmissioning as defined by the NRC means to remove a facility from l service and reduce residual radioactivity to a level that pemits release , of the property for unrestricted use and termination of the license. Three areas of interest in reactor decornissioning are presented in this paper: First, the present and the proposed NRC regulations and guides on deccanissioning; Second, the impact of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and; Third. NRC experience in deconmissioning licensed power reactors. Present and Proposed Regulations and Guides ' i The requirements for authorization to dismantle a reactor facility and

terminate a reactor if cense are specified in 30 CFP 50.82. Other sections .

i of NRC regulations are also applicable durin~g the deconnirsioning process ' l such as 10 CFR Part 20. Standards for Protection Against Radiat' ion and 10  ; j CFR 50.90, Application for Amendment of License er Ccnstrut.tierr'Pemit. If - l spent fuel remains on site,10 CFR Part 70 on Special Nucleacfaterial and j Part 73 Physical Protection of Plants and Materials are applicable. 10 CFR , j Part 51. Environmental Protection Regulptions is applicable and requira an  ; j environmental impact statement for the decor:missioning of a power reactor.

Regulatory Guide 1.86, " Termination of Operatir.g Licenses for Wuclear i

Reactors," enclosed, was specifically written for reactor dectonissioning. , This guide presents alternative methods acceptable for decmniksioning, requirements for each alternative and the residual radioactivity reovirements , for terminating a license. , The regulations and guides for reactor decommissioning are being revised. A proposed rule change dated February 11, 1985 would revise requirements ' with respect to deconmissioning of reactors and other facilities. The . significant changes with respect to reactors are the requirements for ' funding plans, for funding assurance and for deccanissioning planss 2 , As proposed, an electric utility may submit either a deconwissioning  ; i funding plan or a certification that financial assurance for i decommissioning will be provided in an . amount at least equal to

                          $100,000,000 (1984 dollars). Financial assurance may be provided by a variety of methods including internal reserve.                                                                            J

, Three deconmissioning alternatives are defined in t'ne February 11,1985

proposed rule changes. These are DECON, SAFSTOR and ENT0MB. ~

DECON is an alternative in which all equipment, structures and portions of a facility and site containing radioa:tive contaminants are removed or decontaminated to a level acceptable for release to i unrestricted use within a few years of termination of reactor

                                   .eperations.                                                                                               f       I

LO O , i

• SAFSTOR is an alternative in which a facility is placed and maintained in such condition that it can be' safely stored and subsequently decontaminated to levels that permit unrestricted use, j ENTOMB is an alternative in which radioactive contaminants are '

encased in a structurally lona-lived Pl&terISI, such as Concrete. The  :' entombed structure is appropriately Saintained and surveillance is i jj continued until the radioactivity decays to a leveI permitting  : unrestricted use. This alternative wculd be allowable for facilities ,  ;'I contaminated with relatively short-lived radicituclides such~ that all contaminants would decay to levels pert.is'sible for unrestricted use , within a period of about 100 years. flery long-lived radionuclides in .

          .en

- reactor vessels such as niobium-94 e.nd nickel-59 would make this  ; h,, alternative very unlikely for most power reacters.

• Regulatory Guide 1.86,'*Terstr.a'tien of Operating Licenses for Nuclear '

Reactors," is being revised to reflect the aforenentioned terminology and requirements of the proposed rule change. This revised guide is not expected i

,9 to be a significant change from t'ie present guidance.

i .g A second regulatory guide titled "Assurir.g the Availability of Funds for ,

.        .y Decomissioning Nuclear Reactors

• is being developed in conjunction with '

l ct. the proposed rule. Its iturpose is; to provide guidance on methods for W complying with the requirements in the role for submitting cost estimates

               - for deconniissioning. It will also provide guidance en the form and                                                               '

< y]p, content of acceptable fudding methods.

      '*I A third guide,  Format and tontent foe Nuclear Reactor Decomissioning Plar.s".

i scg idehtifies the information needed by the RRC for review and presents a ' formht for a licensee's dRomfissioning p1tn. de: M~ The final rule changec on decommissioning are pot scheduled to be issued until , October 1987 due to the many coments received on the proposed changes. The regulatory guides presentaff above are expected sc be published for coment g in about 6 ,sonths. h Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 198'l The Nuclettr Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law $7-425 January 7,1983) t attablished a fraarwork for t?,e dispesa'l of high-leyel radioactive waste ' The Act provsdts for a high level waste

       .g including soent r.bclear fuels f repository to be built and operating by 1913. It also established a pre ram for the interim stcrage of a limited amount of. spent nuclear fuel
       . 'j et E sites while the repository frtr ultimate dnposal is selected and                                                                 .
           .e.,

deve7oped. Th3 Act stSted, however, that the primary responsibility for

'                    providing interim . storage rests with the reactor ifcensee. The Act further g,

provides that the fliteris storage woulti De available to a licensee only . if: 1) the Ite nsee cannot reasonably previde adequate spo t fusi storage 3* capacity 6t the reactor site er at another of the ifceasee's reactors; 2) the , i g. additional capacity is need6d to ensure continued ordeely cperattoc of the . ! Te reactor and; 3) the licensee is diligent ly pursufrig alterhetihs to the use l

            ,,,      of t9e Federal ir2erim storAoe.                                                                                               !

M 5  ;

                        - _ . - - . - _ - . . . . - - . . .      . . - - ~ _   -_ ..       _   ,-.     . - ~ _ - . _                   _ _____,

                                            .       . . ~ . -             -.

o o - i q

• SAFSTGR is an alternative in which a factitty is pieced and maintained in such condition th&t it can be safely stered and j subsequently decontaminated to levels that pemit unrestricted ust.

ENTOM8 is en alternativs in whic5 radioactive enntaminants are encased in a structurally long-lived material, such at concrete. The entombed structure is appropriately meintained and surveillance is ' continued until the radioactivity decays to a level pEmitting l unrestricted use. This alternative would be allowable for facilities contaminated with relatively short-lived radionucifdes such tnat all

                                   < contaminants would decay to levels permissible for enrestricted use within a period of about 103 years. Very lono-lived radionuc1Mes in reactor vessels such as niobium-94 and nickel'59 would make thit j

alternative very unlikely for most power reactors.

i Pegulatory Guide 1.86, "Temination of Operating Licenses for Huclear }

Raactors " is being revised to reflect the aforementioned teminology and ' requirements of the proposed rule change. Thit revised guide is not expected

• j to be a significant change from the present guidance. ,

j A second regulatory guide titled " Assuring the Availability of Funds for Decomissioning Nuclear Reacters" is being developed in conjunction with the proposed rule. Its purpose is to provide guidance on methsds fer j l cortplying with the requirements in the rule for submitting cost estimates

'                          for deconnissioning. 'It will also provide guidance on the fem and                               ,

content of acceptable funding methods. '

                                                                                                                            )

A third guide, "Fcreat and Content for Huclear Eaaetor Deconynissioning Plans",

identifies the infomation needed by the N9C for review &nd preser.ts a fomat for a licensee's deconsnissioning plan. i The fical rule changes on decommissionir.g are not scheduled to be issued entil  ! i October 1987 due to the many connents received on the proposed changes. The . regulatory guidec presented above are expected t.o be published for comment in about 6 Months. Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 i l The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-425. January 7, 1983) . ' established a framework for the disposal of high-level radioactive waste i including spent nuclear fuel. The Act provideg for a high level waste repository to be built and operating by 1998. It also established a program for the interim storage of a limited aucunt of spent ecclear fuel J at DOE sites while the repository for ultimate disposal is selected and { developed. The Act stated, however, that the primary responsibility for  ; i providing interim storage rests with the reactor licensee. The Act further provides that the interim storage would be available to a licensee only  ; i f.: 1) the licensee cannot reasonably provide adequate spent fuel storage e ! capacity at the reactor site or at another of the licensee's reactor.s; 2) the  ; i additieral capacity is needed to ensure continued orderly operation of the > reactor and; 3) the licensee is diligent.1.y pursuing alternatives to the use ' of the Federsi interim storage. 4. i

O O i. i The Weste Policy Act, therefsre, digtates that fuel stcrage will continue ' > at a perinanently '$butoomn reactor facility until the ' federal relocsitory js

                                                 ~

ready to receive it. The ret result of this condition is that tauclear ' powr reactors wf 31 not likely be irpnetfiately decontaminated, V.e., the DECON alternative; when they are peminently shatdown because the fuel must ,

        ' emain en site until there f s a perrianent repository ave,1*la'cle.

r , t Experience 'in L.icensed Power 9eactor Deconnissioning , i About SD licensed research reacters &nd critical facilities have been decontaminated and their licenses teminated, DECON; and 5 test reactors . i have been placed in safe storage, SAFSTOR. Also, three Deinonstration i i power plants Bonus, Piqua and Hallam have been entombed. ENTOMB nnd ene . Demonstration power plent, Elk Flver has been decontaminated. DECON. ho '

licensed power reactors h&ve been dacontaminated to the point that the license could twe termina:2d. Eight licensed power reacters have been pemanently shutdown, however, and have been or will be placed ir. Some forin  ;

of safe storage, SAFSTOR. Two of these pl&nts, the CYTR, and Pathfinder, ,

4 are now licensed under byoroduct. naterials licenses with the State of  : South Carolina and the NPC, respectively. The renaining six power reactors l

which retain reactor licenses are addrested below, Present NEC policy and

! the proposed new rules on deconnissioning do not provide ~for the transfer of a reactor facility to byprodJct license status. A possest; ion-only reactor  ! facility licente would re'ain in effect during a SAFSTOR period, , I Humboldt Boy Power Plant Unit No. 3 ! The Humboldt Bay Plent, Unit 3 is a 220 MW themal, boiling water react 6e that

has been strJt down since 2976. Units 1 and 2 on the Fumbolat pit.nt site are

gas ar.d cil fired. A daconmissioning plan and environmental rescrt have been i submitted to the NRC. PG5C, the licensee, has selected the SAFSTOR cption for deconnisticcing. The licensee plans to retain the plant in the safe storage status for about 30 years after which time the facility would be .

decontaminated and the license tensinated. The 30-year SAFSTOR p riod  ! recuires a 15 year extensicn to the pretent license. Irradiated fuel will  ! remain irt the spent fuel storege pool until a Federal repetitory is ready j j - for its receipt. DOE interim spent fuel storage cannot be used for

temporary stor' age of Henboldt fuel because

1) there is available storage onsite and 2) the facility is shut down already; th&refore, the need "for continued orderly operation of the reacter" is not a factcr.

i Indian Point Unit No.1 Indian Point Unit 1 is a 615 M4 thermal, pressurized water reactor that has been shut dcwn since 1974. Consolidated Edison, the licensee; has submitted i a decommissicning plan that 1 evolves safe storage (SAFSTOR) unti3 Unit 2 is .

pennanently shut down, after which time Unit I wculd be de

ontam!nated. I Spent fuel will remain in the spent fuel storage pool ,et Unit No. I until l the Federal repository is evallabie. ,

Dresdea Unit No. 1 i Oretsden Unit 1 is a 700 MW thetul, boiling water reactor that has been  ! shut down since 1978. The ficensee Co ,, the SAPSTOR eption for decammissionIng.sserwulth Dresden Unit I willEdtson. intends egmein in e to select 7-

I

                                                 .O                                       o                                           .

t ' i i All of Urit 1

• safe stcrage status until after Unitt ? and 3 are that down, We expect  ;

I fuel will ram &in ensitt uniil a Federal repository is available. . the licensee to sube.it a decomissionirg plan in 1086. c 7 I Peach Bottom Unit No. 1  ; 1 is a 115 MW thermal, high temperature gas coolked Peach Bottoin ' Unit Nos Peach Ecttom Unit 1 is in e , resctor that has beet shut cown since .1974.All fuel has been removed frpm the' si SAFST0kstatusnow. All liquids and p-essurizhd gases such as the  ; DOE lacilities in TQho.  ; heltum primary coolant have been removed from the facility ar,d th coolant system sealed. , tentamineted cooling systems have been retoved from the site and shipped to , Accessible surfaces have been . low level radioactive waste burial sites.A chain linklhe dect'.itaminated. fence hts been ccatairrnent and spent fuel building to establish the eclesion Security for t5e site is maintained by the

• the use of Mcked doors.

i security force usai fo't Peach Bottom Snits 2 and 3. i 4 Femi Unit No.1 , i r-j Tbryi Unit !io.1 is a 200 MW t*>et%1, sudiusi cooled, fact breeder reactorDetrei;

 '                  that hae been chut down since 1973. retain Fermi Unit 1Inia a safe sierag 2 it shut down Dt whfi:h time residual radioectivity would be removed.                                           l sar,y 1985 Detroit Edison apptied f.or a 40-year extersion toAll
                               '                                                                        thefuel Fermi has Unit 1 possessicn-only 1fcense to acconmodate this EAFSTOR period.

been removed from the site as well as the natural uranium blankat assem!!

                     'i'ne fuel Was sent to the AEC Savartnah River Plant ft,r reprecessirig and the The secondary sodive was free                           l blanket       meterial senc to the AEC idaho site.It was barreled in 55 ga' lion drums a of radioactivMy.

l Tin prir:ery sedium, which was slightly radicactive, was retained on site. l A cpr.t'ract was established with the AEC/ DOE to eccept In this 1584sodium in 6 to this primary  ; I 10 years for usa in its sodium cooled reactor progrtms. sodium was barreled and shipped to the DOE Irjaho site. l  : Vallecitos Eoiiino Water Keactor . s 1hc Velle;itos Boilf rg Water Reactor (VDWR) which operated 'at All 50 fuci W thercal ' }I was shut down in 1963 and piectd in a safe storage (SAFSTOR) status. has been removed froc the sitte, the accessible areas decontaminate:' &n to the facility cohtfolled throuD 4 l ! Onclusiens ! lit the past the AEC/ DOC has accepted spent feel from licensed power DOE reactors for storage and reprnetssing when the facility was decommissioned. The Weste c6ntinces to accept spent fuel from restarth and test reseters. '

                           'dolicy    Att of 1982 femoves that option, hewever, for power reacto decour.issioning.

l ready 'for portranene dispecal must, therefore, be considered For sir.gle unit by utilities that plan to deccamission power reacts,rs before the yeer 1998. plaats, where security and a61ntenance costg cainnot he shared with operating setts. the storage of ful:1 or. ::its for .e long term could ~6e a significant cost. 8 L -

ENCLOSURE 3 I ', ' ,# a nch ywtIEosYATES O i

     .e                                      PJUt.;L   R REGULATORY COMMISSION                                                        !

$ TVAsMINoToN. D. C.20$s6 l " "S i

              %ee*

February 26, 1985 HEMORANT?UM F0it: Frederick Coals Office of Ccngressional Affairs FROM: Ines K. Bailey, Chief . Records Services 3 ranch )

                        -             Division of Technical Information.          ,

and Document Control- .s office of*Admiciatration . SUBJICT: P0 m REAC10A EXPIRATION DATES ,

i l

This is in response to your Tebruary 25, 1985 telephone request to Teresa ' 1 Barnhart, for a list of power reactor expiratica. dates. Please find i

cnclosed a list of all povar reserors, in Docket Ngaber order, with i Authoriry-Type information Pertinent to each Dockat*.

         . All of the data has been verified against its supporting                      A-t for     .
            ' ace'uracy and updated:as of February 26, 1985.                    * -
               ';here are 103 power rasetors listed, eighty-nine (89) of nich are operating-                                         ,

ogt of the 89 operating power reactors; (1) seventy (70) 11causes possess an . f

      ~

expiration date within forty (40) years after the date of tasuance of the  ; Construction Fermit; and (2) thirteen (13) licenses possess an expiration date l of ferty (40) years af ter the date of issuance of the Operating License. In  ; total, 83 expiratioti dates are in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50, 550.51 4

               " Duration of License, Renewal" which states:

r "Each license will be issued for a fixed period but in , I no case to exceed 40 years from the date of issuance." ( Six (6) licenses appear to be expired, however, they are in accordance with l 30 CTE Part 2, 51.109 5 "Effect of Timely Renewal Application" which states: , 1

                              ','If at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of                                             ,

existing licensa authorizing any activity of a contiaming ' - natura, a licensee files an application for a renewal or for a new license for the activity so authorized, the , existing licene will not he deemed to have expired until  : I the 'Licanse has been finally determined." . 9  :

                                                                                                                               /

o l

                                                         .                                                    l
                                        .O                                   .
                                                                              . O                   .
     .        Frsderick Combs                                                   February 26, 1985         l l

The remainir.g fourteen (14) power operating reactors, are not operating and fall into the following categories. STATUS NUMBER OF POWER REACTORS LICENSES Possession only 5 Revoked 1 Shutdown 3 . Suspended 2 , Terminated 3 If we may be of further assistance, please do no hesitate to call.

 !                                                                 g i                                                      Ines   . Bailey, Chief Records Services Branch Division of Technical Information
                             ~

• and Docunept Control Office of Administration

Enclosure:

As stated ec w/encicsure W. Pesaw M. Steele

         . T. Barnhart Central Files i

7 CONTACT: Teresa S. Barnhar.t Licensing Aide License Authority Files Records Services Branch 1 Division of Technical Information ' and Dccument Control Office of Administration x27405 . i I , g' l .

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            -. . . o s .m                 44                            lE       I.

DATE OF l AUTHORIZED OPERATING IMTE OF CF CONSTE. FF.ANIT NO, IR58tANCE k LICENSE DATE OF DATE OF AFFLICATION CKtt RESPONSitt.E TYPE CLASS F0WEA LEVEL STATUS PLANT NAME NUMBER ISSUANCE EXPIRATION HRER 1.ICENSEE . Revoked 3/4/N 6/19/80 3/22/55 CPPR-1

                                              ?Jasolidated Edison                                                         3/26/62      12/16/69 "     PWR          104(b) n an               nt Unit DP{t-5 50-3                                           Company of New York Shutdown 6/24/55           CPPR-2 5/4/%

5/4/96 Bi'R 104(b) 10/31/78 , nwealt Edison Dresden, Unit 1 DPR'-2 9/78/59 50-13 ..ompany Possession 1/6/56 CPPR-4 8/4/56 Mtroit Edison O m any Enri Perei. Unit 5/10/63 6/30/85 PBR 104(c) DN73 OPR,9 M-16 " " CPPR-3 5/14/% 1/10/56 7/29/57 5/14/63 BWR 104(b) 7/25/66 o,n u lfo C'"***I II'***IC vallecitos BWR 8/31/57 5/4/96 50-18 DPR-1 C^=any 11/4/57 Active 6/29/56 CPPR-5 I 7/9/60 11/4/97 PWR 104(b) 600 ffW(t) I* Yankee-Rowe DPR-3 50- C ey - Terminated 3/5/73 3/30/59 CPPR-8 3/12/64 9/12/72' BUR 104(b) -- 50-1,., Northern Stat'ee Power Pathfinder DPk Company - ' Shutdown 12/30/76 4/27/59 CPPR-10 $ 104(t4 Pacific Cao & Electric d" I*F' DPR-7 8/28/62 N9/2000 'BWR 50-133 Company

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ' '                                   I'
                                                                                                                                                         ,1NR        104(b)       - - -                  /

3" DPR-8 11/27/62 L2/31/68 IN en P As oc, eac r Possession 2/11/60 Inc. Only 8/18/59 CPPR-6 PWR 104(b) --- [ Saxton 2/11/2000 Saxton Nuclear? DBR-4 11/15/61 1/10/74 50-146 Experimental Corp. 5/31[60 1/14/60 CPPR.9 BWR 104(b) 240 HW(t) Active Cons mers Power Compan r Big Rock Point DPR-6 d/30/62 5/31/2000 __ 50-155 CPPR-12 2/23/62 7/22/60 104(b) L2/24/75 H1CR * , 50-171 Philadelphia Electric Pea h Bottom. Unit DPR-12 '1/24/66 7/14/75

                                                    ~- -                                                                                                                                                'ossession                                                             CPPR-11              8/10/61 01                                      2/1/61          ,

Vallecitos Experi-General Electric Co. 1/26/2016 ESR 104(6) 671/68

                                              '                                   mental Superheat               DR-10         11/12/63 Reactor 2/1/63                       CPPR-13            3/2/64 104(b)     1347 HW(t)'             Active-7/27/72           PWR San Onofre, Unit 1 DPR-13 3/27/67 n Ca1    raia 50-206                                                      ,

5/26 M , SEE DPR-61 9/6/63 CPPR-14 DPR-14 6/30/67 104(b) 1825 MW(t) Active Connecticut Yankee ' *" ** 5/26/2004 PWR 50-213 DPR-61 12/27/74 l Atomic Power Company CPPR-15 12/15/64 1930 MW(t) Active 3/26/64 4/9/72 BWR 104'(b)

                                                       ***                             Oyster

• Creek DPR-16 4/9/69 ..

50-219 t . , y i t / \

• 8

                                                                                                                                                                          )

N e i . I _ A_ m

M E a . I S l w. . A .. DATE OF CF CONSTE. DATE OF AITI110RIZED OPERATING LICENSE DATE OF DATE OF FF.R*f!T JM, IAmtauCEk la)CKET RESPONSill.E F0WER LEVEL STATUS AFFLICATION ISSUANCE EXFIRATION TYPE CIASS LICENSEE PIANT HAME HUMBER HUMBER "k #" BWR 104(b) 1850 W (t) Active 3/30/64 CPPR-16 4/12/65 Nine Mile Point 50-220 $' ,', DP 2/2 4 WU 9/30/74 CPPR-17 50-231 General Electric Company Reactor

                                                  **"f
                                                    *8             Dk-15      3/4/69       9/4/73 SCR     104(b)        ---

1/10/66 2527 W (t) Active 4/15/65 CPPR-13

                         "*                Dresden,tinit 2         DPR-19     12/22/69      12/22/72                           BWR'    104(b) 5&237 11/1/65       CPPR-19         4/25/66 8         6'                                         PWR     104(b)     1520 W (t)    Active 50-244           *,.    ,,' ,    R. E. Cinne Nuclea                       j84                            5 g                          Power Plant, Unit 1 M       IM         2011 M t)     Aet he       11/12/65      m -20           WN 1 stone,     t
                                                                        -      1/     0     W 7/73'                                                      .

5 Ener an Active 12/6/65 CPPR-21 10/14M6 C e date Ed 10/19/71 10/14/2dO6 PWR 104(b) 2758 W (t) 50-247 ,. g Indian Pt. Unit 2 DPy26-2/10/66 CPPR-22 10/14/g6 DPR-25 1/12/71 10/14/2006 BWR 104(b) 2527 W (t) Active Cs - nalth Edison Dresden. Unit 3 ,, e.- 50-249 c m any Active 3/22/66 CPPR*27** 4/27/67 4/27/2007 PWR 104(b) 2200 ,W(t) Plorida Power & L1Rh t Turkey Point, Unit DPR-31 7/19/72 Company #3 )50-250 8 3/22/66 CPPR-23 4/27/67 Il Florida Power'& Light Tu ey Point, Unit 4/10/73 4/27/2007 PWR 104(b) 2200 W (t) Active 50-251 DPR-41 Active 5/31/66 CPPR-23 2/15/47 W d Cities, Unit 2/15/2007 BWR 104(b) 2511 W (t) Co monwealth Edison DPR-29 10/1/71 50-254 Comeeny di 6/2/66 CPPR-25 3/14/67 3/24/71 3/1/74 PWR 104(b) 2530 W(t) Active Palisades Plant DPR-20 I 50-255 Consumers Power "

   !               Company              .

5/10/67 7/7/66 CPPR-29 I Tennessee Valley

• I* * *
• 6/26/73 5/10/2007 BWR 104(b) 3293 W(t) Active .

DPR-33 5' V' Authority 7/7/66 CPPR-20 5/10/67 Tennessee Valley " ~ BWR 104(b) 3293 W(t) Active e * * ##' DPR-52 7/28/74 5/10/2007* I 54-260 Authority q 104(b) 2300 W (t) Active 7/25/66 CPPR-26 4/13/61 Power & L1RhtH B. Robinson, DPR-23 7/31/70 4/13/2007 PWR BWR ' 104(b) 1670 W (t) Active 8/1/66 CPTR-31 6/19/67 6/19/2007 2 Northern States Power Montieg11o, Unit 1 DPR-22

• 9/8/70 **

i! 50-263 Company

                                                                                                                                  +
                                                                                                                                          ...              3
                                                                                                                         .                  1
                                                                                                                                  .s I

t r.1 l

 '

• l _

x - i

L 8 E E .. HOPERATING' I COIISTR. I DATE OF l DATE OF AUTilotIZED DATE OF CF AFFLICATI0ld FF.RMIT )F) IRim4NCE %

                                                                         ' t.ICENSE DATE OF                                 TTFE       C!ARS     FOWER LEVEL STATUS 4ET ' RESPONSIBLE                                                                   ISSUANCE     EXPIftATION PLANT NAME                 HUMBER                                                                                                                                    2/15/67 LICENSEE                                                                                                                                                            8/18/66       CPPR-24 HRER 104(b. 2511 W (t)            Active 2/15/2007            BWR C
                          ;81th Edi'             O         Cities, Unit DP.R-30          3/13/72 54-265           g                                                                                                                                                                                 CPPR-32            7/1?/67 Active        8/31/66 PWR         104(b) 1518 W (t)

Wisconsi.n Electric Po t Beach, Unit D,PR-24 10/5/70' ! 7/19/2007 7/19/68 50-266 - 10/19/66 CPPR-54 104(b) 33773j73 9/17/2008 HICR e se Port Saint vrain ppg,34 11/6/67' 50-267 11/28/66 CPPD-33 104(b) 2568 W (t) Active 11/6/2007 PWR DPR'-38 2/6/73 Duke Power Company Oconee Unit 1 ' 11/6/67 11/28/66 CPPR-34

  $b269                                                                                                                                            2568 W(t)           Active 11/6/2007            PWR         104(b)

DPR-47 10/6/73 Duke. Power Company Oconee Unit 2 50-;

• 12/11N7 11/30/66 CPPR-36 m (b) 1593 W(t) Actin 12/11/2007 SWR 3/21/72

                                                      '""""**""**              ""(2 8.

50-271 ta i n , PR-52 W2W __ Actin 12/9/66 9/25/2008 iM W(bb 3338 W(t) . Sales, t1 WR- 0 8/13/76 ,

' 50-272           R       ic 6 .a        Co.                                                                                                                  *           **

i - 23 8 to Canyon, o hfo / 8 1/31/68 50-275 #N, g , ,,7 Active 2/6/.67 CPPR-37 3293 W(t) BWR 104(b)

                                        .     ~_

DPR-44 8/8/73 1/31/2008 Peach Bottom, Unit Philadelphiaklectric CPPR-34 1/31/08 50-277 #2 2/6/67 3293 W (t) Active t'a-aany _ BWR 104(b) DPR-56 7/2/74 1/31/2008 Philadelphia Elsetric Peach Bottom, Unit CPPR-43 6/25/64 278 Company g3 Active 3/16/67 PUR 104(b) 2441 W(t) DPR-32 5/25/12 6/25/2008

                           "       ****#* '            Surry, Unit 1 5            ,                                                                                                                                                                   3/16/62     , CPPR-44             6/25/68 2441 W (t)        Active PWR         104(b)

DPR-37 1/29/73 6/25/2'008 I e tric 6 .I Surry, Unit 2 CPPR-45 6/25/68

  . 50-281                Rfn                                                                                                                                             Active        4/5/67 t/25/2008          PWR        104(b) 1650 W (t)"

8/9/73 n i

                                               *"*#            rie Island,        DPR-42 P

59-282 Actin W2N mRM 6/7/68 6/7/2 M M WO IW W

• MR-M 5/24 73 jg C=-u Snua 50-285 g Aoi.e en5in

                                                                  -                                               ,,13y0s         .          - (b) m5 W(t>                                                      .,

0,,-64 ,2y2,,5

,!50-m ;;;g;;;<gy
     -               1 inp,.nPointUnit
                                                                                 .-        .i        ...<           . . . _     . _ . . . . _      .

e e5

          ~             ~

W W

8 gig 1 a '- . L l A CD U % 1! <f14TE OF JtT7HORIFRD GPERATING DATE OF CF < RESP 0ltSISLE t.ICENSE DATE OF DATE OF P7.30117 JM, 14SH4 pre - In)CKET CIABS PGER LEVat. STATUS APPLICATION PIANT M4NE NtMBER ISSUANCE EXPIRAT10*) TYPE stPSER I.ICalSEE 1 CPPI-35 PWR 104(b) 2568 W(t). Active 4/29/67 11/6/67 Oconee Unit 3 DPR-55 7/19/74 11/6/2007 Duke Power Company * . gy * ,

                                                                      .                                                                                                                          Suspended 5/1/67            CPPR-40            5/18/64 ee Mila Island                                   5/18/2008             PWR          104(b)             -           ' 9/23/82 CPU Nuclear                                                    DPR-50          4/19/74 54289 6/23/67          CPPR-49           S/26/64 8/26/2048              bwR         104 tb)         1998 W(t)        Active Boston Rdison Company                  Pilgrim                  DPR-35         6/8/72 50-293                                                                                           .

1 7/12/67 CPPR-58 12/26/68 wealth Moon 4/6/73 12/26/2008 Pk'R 104(b) 3250 W (t) Active 50-295 Zion Unie 1 DPR-39 7/13/67 CPPR-43 7/31/68 Tenne..ee v.u.P 7/21/2004 BWR 104(b) 3293,W(t) Active 50 r~ Authority Sr e Ferry, Uni' DPR-68 7/2/76

• 7/26/67 .

CPTR-42 6/4/65

                                         **        * " *

• Cooper Station ' Dg-46 1/18/74 674/2004 BWR 104(b) 2381 h.J(t) Active eggve 50-298*

District 1519 W (t) ' Active 7/17/67 CPPR-47 7/25/6g "I'* **I" "I'***I* "*I"' **** * ** DPR-27 11/16/71 '7/25/2008 j PWR 104(bi 50-301 Company #2 8/10/67 CPPR *51*

• 9/25/68 Active rida F wer Crystal River, DPR-72 12/3/76 9/25/2008 PWR 104th) *S44 fel(t) i 50-302 Corporation , g,g, 3 CPPR-59 12/26/68 104(b) 3250 W (t) Active 8/15/67 ggfggf73 12/26/2008 DPR-48 PWR Zion, A t 50-304 S/18/67 CPPR-50 8/6/68 S/6/2008 PWR 104(h) 1650 W (t) Active

                                                                        ""*""**                    brR-41        12/21/73 5 & 305 8/24/67          CPPR-46           6/25/64 6/25/2008                FWW         104(b)         1650 MW(t)       Activa-50-306 h tk ra hates P wef Prairie Island,                            PPR-60        10/29/74
                                          **I         .-                Unit _2              _

9/26/67 CPPR-55 10/21/68-Meie. Yarkee Atomic Dea-36 4/15/72 10/21/2006 PWR 104(b) 2630 W(t) Activa . Power Company Mains Tankee 3411 W(t) Activ 10/23/67 CPPR-53 9/25/68 DPR-75 4/18/80 9/25/2000- PWR 104(b)

                                            *

• c' rales, Unit 1 So-311 -

Ricctrie 6 Css Co. 4.1 - ,! Wew Jersev 11/1/67 CPPR-56 10/11/68 al 8/1t,/74 10/11/2006 reR 104(b) 2772 W st) Active 3t2 a Rancho Seco DP2-54 = Active 11/24/67 CPPR-57 12/6/6e Arkanssa Power 6 Light Arkanses Muclear 12/6/2008 PWR 104(:>) 25c8 W(t) one, edit t cPR-51 5/21/74 ..

.I 50-313                            Company                                                                                  '                         .                                 ,

i t

• 9

                                                                                                                                                           .P S

O . ____.___m_______.__m_______ _ _ _ _ . _ _*m -m h - == m- e_ w_ = *w a . -

I E l La a m . s . ... m a m El AUT110RIEED OPERATINC MTE OF CF CONSTE. MTE OF ,10CKET RESF0llSIBLE LICENSE DATE OF DATE OF 1 APPLICA72018 P33taf!T jfD, JR30e4asts , PLANT NAME NUMBER ISSUANCE EXPIRATION 1?FE CIASS FOWER' LEVEL STATUS HUMBER LICENSEE L-I"dI'"* ' 10/25/74 3/25/2009 PWR 104(b) 3250 W(t)* Active 12/15/67 CPPR-60 3/25/M I* I8'" D. C. Cook, Unit QPR-58 50-315 Electric , n Indiana D.C. Cook, Unit 3/25/M 50-316 Electric,6 Michigan DPR-74 12/23/77 3/25/2009 PWR 104(b) 3411 W(t) Active 12/15/67 CPPa-61

                                                               #2 7/7/2009      WR        104(b)' 2700 W (t)           Active     1/22/68          M R-63              7/7/M 7/31/ 4 ec           ay        Uf 1 Baltimore ces 6           Calvert ' " O f s ,                                                                                                 1/22/68          GPR-64 IIIIN       '

8/13/76 7/7/2009 PWR 104(b) 2700 MW(t) Active 50-318 Electric Company Unit 2 DPR-69

                                                                     ~

• Suspended CPU Nuclear 1hree W 7sito ' 7/20/79 4/22/68 CPPR-66 IIIOIN 2/8/78 11/4/2009 PWR 103 Unit 2 DPR-73 5

                                                                                                                                                                                            ~

104(b) 2436 W (t) Active 5/3/68 CPPR-65 9/30/09 Coorgia P wer C~==any Hatch, Unit 1

• DER-57 8/6/74 9/30/,2099 BWR 50-321 Shoreham Nuclear NPP-19 4/13/2013 BWR 103 24.36 KW(t) Active 5/15/68 CPPR-95 4/14/7/

50-322 Long Island Lighting 12/7/84 " Company Power Station , e' 104(b) 2436 W (t) Active 7/26/68 CPPR1 67'* 2/7/M Carolina Power & Brunswick, Unit 2 DPR-62 12/27/74 2/6/2010 BWR 5& 324 Lf3ht Company : 104(b) 2436 W (t) Active 7/26/78 CPPR-68 2/7/M Brunswick, Unit 1 DPR-71 9/8/76 2/7/2010 BWR 50-325 g y . Tennessee Valley 10/14/68 CPPR-12 5/27/M Sequoyah, Unit 1 DPR-77 2/29/80. 5/27/2010 PWR 104(b) 3411 W (t) Active Authority l Tennessee Valley - Active 10/14/68 , CPPR-73 5/27/M Sequoyah, Unit 2 DPR-79 6/25/81 ,5/27/2010 PWR 104(b) 3411 W(t) - - l' Authority y _ .- 6/22/M 9 50 W , Iowa Electric & Power Duane Arnold der-49 2/22/74 6/21/2010 BWR 104(b) 1658 W (t) Active 10/30/68 , CPPR-70 c--sey . 5/20/M Power Aut rity of tb , A'ctive 12/31/68 CPPR-71 Fitzpatrick DPR-59 10/17/74 5/20/2010 BWR 104(b) 2436 W (t)

   ! 50-333                       State of New York                                                                                                                                             .                               ---

1/10/69 CPPR-75 6/26/79 1 LPR-66 1/30/76 6/25/201C PWR 104(bl 265'2bW(t) Active 50-334 Duquesne Light company Beaver Valley, , Unit 1 , 2700 W(t) Active 1/29/69 CPPR-74 . _ y/g/g - 71 rida Power & Light 3/1/76 7/1/2010 PWR 104(b)

'l 50-335-St. Ludie Unit 1           DPR-67
     .                             Company                                                                                     e                              ,

s

                                                                                                                                 #            I 1                                                                                                           e
                                                                                                                                 ,i, h

t

                                                                         ~

I i L .a O h

                                                                                                                                                                                                                            %          eaf

I Q\FCE 3 3 2 3, 3 2 7 2 3 OlAI M 4- 7 7 7 d 1 1 1 7 7 7 I / 7 7 1' 7 7

                                                                                                     /
                                                                                                                    /

8

                                                                                                                                  /

8 7

                                                                                                                                                /
                                                                                                                                                         / .

7 / / / / 7

 .EI  Tf AR t       1
                    /

1

                               /

9 1

                                                /

9 1 7

                                                             /

3

                                                                          /

4 2 6 1 9 1 1

                                                                                                                    /

1

                                                                                                                                  /

6 1 2

                                                                                                                                                         /

6

                                                                                                                                                                            /

0 9 2

                                                                                                                                                                                       /

8 2

                                                                                                                                                                                                     /

1

                                                                                                                                                                                                                       /

l

                                                /            /            /           /              /              0             0             /         2                                                            9 f   P          2         /                                                                                                  1             8          1                1          2             2 1         2                2            2            3           8               6             1
     !)

3 *

• 9 1
• 6 9 3 4 9 RT 6 7 8 9 0 5 0 7 8 6 0 8 8 8 9 TI 7 7 7 8 8 1 9 9 8 9 - - -

SM 7

                                                                            -              -           -              -             -             -         -                 -                                        R NR            -            -                -            -

R R R R R R R R W R R R R R  ? P F P O F. F F F ' F F F F F F CF F F F F F F I P F., F F F F C F C P C G C C C C W C C C C C C 1 0 , - F0 CI 9 9 0 0 T 6 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 7 FA 9, 9 9 6 9 6 9 / 7 7 7 / 7 7 7 7

                                                                                                                                                                                                      /                /

OC 6 6

                                                /            /             6              5           /             /             /              5         /                 /         /

8 8 3 3 EL I / 8

                               /

1 1 5 2

                                                                          /

1 / 1 6 2 8 2 8 2 1

                                                                                                                                                 /

4 2 7 1 1 1

                                                                                                                                                                                                      /
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        /

1 TF 2 2 2 / / / 0 / / /

                   /           /                 /           /            /               0                                                                                  9          9              9                1 AF         2            3                3            6            8              1           2              5             5             1          7 DA C

N I e e e e e e e TS e e e e e e e e v v v v v v v v i AU v v v v v v i v i i i i i i i i RT i i i i i i t t t t t t t t t c EA t t t t t t c c c c c c c c PT c c c c c c A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A OS LE DE L

                   *                                                                      )                          )             )              )         )                 )          )             )
                                                                                                                                                                                                                        )

t

                    )           )                 )            )            )                                                                                t                 t          t             t EV          t            t                t            t            t             t           )               t

( t ( t ( ( ( ( ( , ZE ( ( ( ( ( ( t ( W W W W IL W W W W W W ( M W W M R M M M M M M W W M M 0R l E 2 2 W 0 0 2 6 5 1 1 3 2 i 0 5 5 1 9 5 3 1 1 1 TW 0 7 7 1 7 5 5 9 8 4 4 3 6 3 3 6 4 U0 7 7 7 4 7 2 6 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 3 AF 2 2 2 3

                    )

S b 3 3 S (

                                                                            )              3            3             3              3             3         3                 3          3             0                 0              O A     4            3                3            3                                                                                                              0          0             1                 1                ./,

a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 L 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 C I R R R R R P R R R R R R . R R R R W

• 4 W W .

r W W W W W W W W W W W W P P P B e T P P P F B P P P B P P 4 3 3 2 3 ll 'G 1 2 1 2 1 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 0 1 1 s1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 I 0 1 1 1 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 FT 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 7 2 0 2 2 / / / 2 / 2 / 2 OAR / 1 2

                                   /                /            2           /              /

6 8 8 / 7 / 6 8 2

                                                                                                                                                                                                         /

8

                                                                                                                                                                                                                           /

7

'1 8 9 / 4 6 2 1 1 6 2 1 EI 1 / / / 1 / / / 2

                      /            1                1             8           2 TP         2            /                /            /           /           ./              0              0             0             /         2                 2            2           /                 /

4 AX 1 2 2 2 3 8 1 1 1 8 1 1 2 DE m - 7 5 4 2 0 1 2 E 7 7 8 2 8 8 8 8 7 0 7 7 7 8 3 8 FC 5 / 8 / 7 7 / 8 / / 3 / / / 8 / ON 7 6 / 1 / / 6 / 5 1 2 3 8 3 / 7 A / 2 1 2 2 5 2 6

                                                                                                                                                    /          1                 1          2             3                 1 EU          1           /                 1            /           2               2          /               1            /

0 / / / / / TS / 1 / 1 / / 0 / 1 7 1 3 4 AS 8 1 4 1 4 6 1 2 1 1 6 DI 7 1 5 4 7 0 5 E 6 - 7 1 3 '2- 2 1 1 8 5 6 9 1 1

SR - F - - - - - - - - - - -

F NE R P F F ,f F F F F F F F F ES P P P P P P, N P P P P P P P P N N N N CN D - N N N N N N N N N I. U t H 2 2 t y 1 t t y r t i I" e i n i n e a e 1 2 1 i n " l r t U U l r 2 l t t t n U " i n a . c i i i A U a u n n n

                                          ,          '                           e      F                  U                 ,             . F                t U                U
                           .            a

• s e e i N U E e n " s . , r r . n . ',

n n e M k f f M U a ,

                                                                                                                                                                                                                           *e M       o              A          #"                           B                           c              o              o                                                    e             e A                                                                      h1                 i                n             n     h2                 .             s             r             r               l N       t s              h           h

• t s p r O O p h n i i u

l a l l n i et e et c a u S T N l h o h v a si

                                                                                          >      n         i m              n a

n a si on t a k G c C c a A i M N " D A JU L S S JU H A M M L L I P t y c y y h n i n n g n a r

• a ap i

y y o

                                                                 .               p                     t                                          p                             L

• c
• m c
• m m .

n n s

• i
• l y o e
• o o . & a a p

i

• C. C p d
• r
• a n C l r m m E
• r E e a o t o

                       " ,           c y

• n c r r e E'

L B IE

                       "             e n

• l a E p m

                                                           ,   ems n

GC o i d w F e i h a* p e w o P e w o P w o C r e C r e h l t a e a o deic E l

• F. e w wy SE
• i c ey ey-
• s a o w nn l

l S n o sn dn n n i P P 0N i r 1" s r i t d aa aa a g oa mp PE " , e b p l p b r e e SC aa8 r t c r e l am i m l a o a k u k u mm oo . EI m ol o l o ho E A C A D D CC , RL g P FE T AC PC 2 1 2 4 6 3 9 0 3 6 8 9 4 8 6 7 I 5 6 6 6 6 TR 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 3 EE KR 3 3 3 0 a 3 0 3 0 3 0 3 3 0

                                                                                                                                                                      -   _        0               &             0 Ci e         0             0               0              0                                      5              5             5         5               5               5             5             5 5            5                              5            5     5 o                                          5 ti d                                                                                                                                                        iI                    l 8
                                                                                                                                                                                                                             .I      .

k N '

                                                                                      .     . ..                                 n            .
                                                                                                                                              ~
                                                                                                                                                            <~
                    .          x         .        .
                                                  ~         ~

0 M 3 3

  . n1 N

3 s t

                                         ~

3 2 0 m 0 e 3 C e 3 0 e 0 0

• M-C e

0 m 3 5 l c, - . E  ; 2 R R ge- 8 ss s s , ,

                                                                                                       *T                T         T            T              T.
     **                                             T         T              T             i.

a. m = T. T. T. .'. b b

• b t- b b b b b ,

65 ~ 2 "A  :  :  :  : O C C 3 3 2-a b6 3 3 3 0 3

       .3             x           t       w         w         3               g                         0      0                                O.

3

       **                         0       R         R                                                                     -         O.                          -

gg b- s. . ~

                                  -        e         n        O.

W * # #

     'gj               *

:  :  :  :  : 3

: 3 b t; 3 3 3 4 e e e 3 e e 3 C

d- n

                                                                                                                                     =           =               =
    $g$                                                                          n                                                                                                   .-
                       - -                                     n                                                 "

e  : "  :  :  : y n g, a ya a n. . i i yn a n i o S  : = m  : ga = . 0  : 2  % R A A S

          <M            =           2                 :         ::               :                                                                                                         -
                                                                                              .          n                                          .

o .

     ;                                                                                                   ;                                         m a                 e            m                 e          o         e 2             2
                                                                                                                                                                                                  'n  i F-       e           e        e         e 2                2            2         2       2          2         2                                                         .
                %       2           2        2         2 t,

hN I M EI l E .E I E!  ! -E E E

                                                                                                =                             -        a                          x                               ~

i'wp -

2 2

                                            -~

8 8 E5 2 Le ., 88 *8 2 3 82 03 2 3 2 0 " 2 t 3 8: ""O 2" 0

           *2 3O                      C:                          3                =            0 . ***                    3*          O           =0
                                                                                                                                                  >S                "

pa -> 0 a ':: " 33 S g$ 0 R w 3 I 2 lli - . , . ~ . , se . 3

                 =                  .          ~

• 2 3 20""" 3" "3 oE 3 2 O OS CO O

                                                         =        3                  3          0 0" 2*: *O g5 O                      O 0

O

                                               %         A        3                  3           0 23 2"3 30                             23 32                                 .

8~  :::; OR A-

                                               *          =

• TO = OM g, * .

L L QL L LL LL LL La i

                                      .L        L.4                                                                                                                   k Em Lk-MI                       k.      k         k        k              'I'              k kk kkk kk                 -

kk kk _ __ .: = " " " - u u *

                                                                    "                                "             3"           e si          S       S                       1                                             ".-

3: . s' 5 3" 3" - i J

     =                                            .
                                                                                  "             as                 Ms                     o           %

s #3" 3 2 3 J 8 . =. 9 E x. 2 .

                                    .                                                                              ..          a                                  *"

uu 2 2 y x .

                                                                                                          =

fa . . 4" t; a 3% 8 u t. 8 s

                                                                       .           :'"".:8       E"l3 5

an a e 2 0" 3" as es

                                                                     #             se            k s       a     . .* = ={c {c'                   u e                                     4

• P u 2 . t 3 o.

E j, ly!k

• h "~'f f ,ss! 3 $E

                                                                                                     .n. !
                                                                                    =3a

n. s- a. a. * . ~.E S S 11:

                                                                                                                                            -            n. 4*

3

                =g g =5.
                              *t3 =33 g 2         i T 2 1.2 i

42 r. 0o% !" 22 s. a e  ; ; P "gaP 83 g-e

                .o                                . e s. a                           s. t.

1g sa ms , ss z. :. c a aa s  :: _ l

                                                                                                                                  .,                                    m n       e                        a              n w .            a        n                              ..

b b b b b + b h- b b m_ b m __ _ m b e + ,m_ m m e m

                                                                                                                                                                     .__,.e=

. ENCLOSURE 4 OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION' - PLANIS FILE REPORTS EXPLANATORY NOTES

1. APPLICABILITY OF NOTES THIS PAGE OF NOTES HAS GENERIC APPLICABILITY TO SEVERAL REPORTS G FROM THE " PLANTS" DATA FILE, AND IS ATTACHED TO ALL THOSE REPORTS; THEREFORE, CERTAIN REFERENCES MAY NOT BE FOUND IN THE PARTICULAR REPORT YOU MAY BE READING.

2. VALIDITY OF REPORT PLEASE RECOGNIZE SOME REFORTS ARE ISSUED WEEKLY. OTHERS, AD HOC. IS PUBLISHED, THAT THE DATES SHOWN AR-E VALID AS OF THE DAY THE REPORT NOT AS OF THE DAY THE REPORT IS READ, WHICH MAY BE WEEKS LATER.

  ~. STAGE DE5CRIPTORS SD = SHUTDOWN 03 = OFEFATING RE6CTOR CW = CASEWORK ti.e.,     UNDER OPERATING LICENSE REVIEWi CD = CANCELLED--PLANT HELD A VALID CONSTRUCTION PERMIT 4    OL AND FP DATES (5% OR THE OL DATE IS EITHER THE ACTUAL OR ESTIMATED OPERATING LICENSE GREATER) ISSUE DATE. THE FP (FULL-POWER) DATE IS THE DATE OF THE ACTUAL OR PROJECTED COMMISSION DECISION TO REMOVE RESTRICTIONS AND PERMIT ASCENSION TO 100%. AND IS BASED ON THE UTILITY COMPANY ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COMFLETION.

E = ESTIMATED; C = CANCELLED; N = NOT SCHEDULED FOOTNOTES: IN THE FORMAT MM/DD/YY THE COMPUTER ONLY ACCEPTS VALID POSSIBLE DATESTO SATIGFY T!!A f REQU IRE MEN T, [M ORDER iNO THIP TFENTH MONT!!, 1OR EX(.MPLEF. Gl?EN EHfERED Wil;..RE NO VALID DATE EsISTS: THEREFORE, Tild DnTE 01/ 01/P7 HAS I T 3HOllLD BE READ AS "UNLNOWN" OR "UOf SCHE 0111ED"

5. SOURCE THEIR THIS REPORT USES THE BEVILL/ MONTHLY AND NTOL REPORTS AS BASES:

PLEASE REFER TO THOSE REPORTS FOOTNOTES ARE ALSO APPLICABLE HERE. FOR COMPLETE INFORMATION.

6. CONTACT FOR OUESTIONS, CHANGES, EXTRA COPIES, ETC.. CONTACT CARLOS A.VELEZ, AT X-24335.

4

l

                        '         p

D n

k)

   , **********************************************************************:                 l l

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION 1 l PLANTS SORTED BY STAGE & OL DATE l 08/11/86 13:58:08 BASIS: 07/30/86 BEVILL/ PREPARED BY MTHLY & 07/28/86 NTOL REPT DOCKET PLANT STGE TYPE VEND OL DATE FP DATE 1 50010 Dresden 1 SD BWR GE 06/02/60 06/02/60 2_50133 Humboldt Bay 3 SD BWR GE 08/28/62 08/28/62 SD PWR BW O2/08/78 02/08/78 d{50320 TMI]{p NO. OF PMs:

                 %f gi:50029;;7 ankee7Rowe Y                >  OR    PWR   WE      07/29/60      07/29/60 2  50155 big" Rock Point'1     OR    BWR   GE      08/30/62      08/30/62 3  50206 San Onofre 1          OR    PWR   WE      03/27/67      03/27/67 4  50213 Haddam Neck           OR    PWR   WE      06/30/67      06/30/67 5  50409 La Crosse             OR    BWR   AC      07/03/67      07/03/67 6  50219 Oyster Creek 1        OR    BWR   GE      08/01/69      08/01/69 7  50220 Nine Mile Point 1     OR    BWR   GE      08/22/69      08/22/69
         '8 50244 Ginna                 OR    PWR   WE      09/16/69      09/16/69 9 50237 Dresden 2              OR    BWR   GE      12/22/69       12/22/69 10 50261 Robinson 2              OR    PWR   WE      09/23/70      09/23/70 11 50266 Point Beach 1           OR    PWR   WE      10/05/70       10/05/70 12 50245 Millstone 1             OR    BWR   GE      10/26/70       10/26/70 13 50263 Monticello              OR    BWR   GE      01/19/71      01/19/71 14 50249 Dresden 3               OR    BWR   GE      03/02/71      03/02/71 15 50280 Surry 1                 OR    PWR   WE      05/25/72      05/25/72 16 50250 Turkey Point 3          OR    PWR   WE      07/19/72      07/19/72 17 50293 Pilgrim 1               OR    BWR   GE      09/15/72       09/15/72 18 50255 Palisades               OR    FWR   CE       10/16/72      10/16/72 19 50254 Quad Cities 1           OR    BWR   GE       12/14/72      12/14/72 20 50265 Quad Cities 2           OR    BWR   GE       12/14/72      12/14/72 21 50281 Surry 2                 OR    PWR   WE      01/29/73       01/29/73 22 50269 Oconee 1                 OR   PWR   BW      O2/06/73       02/06/73 23 50271 Vermont Yankee 1         OR    BWR  GE      02/28/73       02/28/73 24 50301 Point Beach 2            OR   PWR   WE      03/08/73       03/08/73 25 50251 Turkey Point 4           OR    PWR  WE      04/10/73       04/10/73 26 50309 Maine Yankee             OR    PWR  CE      06/29/73       06/29/73 27 50285 Fort Calhoun 1           OR    PWR  CE      08/09/73       08/09/73 28 50247 Indian Point 2           OR    PWR  WE      09/28/73       09/28/73 29 50270 Oconee 2                 OR    PWR   BW      10/06/73      10/06/73 30 50295 Zion 1                   OR    PWR  WE       10/19/73      10/19/73 31 50304 Zion 2                   OR    PWR   WE      11/14/73      11/14/73 32 50277 Peach Bottom 2           OR    BWR   GE      12/14/73      12/14/73 33 50259 Browns Ferry 1           OR    BWR   GE      12/20/73      12/20/73
      ** NOTE:    THIS REPORT IS NOT COMPLETE IF THE COVER / NOTES PAGE IS MISSING

) . ,

                      .          Ov' O

O

 .       PLANTS SORTED BY STAGE & OL DATE (Continued) 08/11/86             2 DOCKET  PLANT                     STGE TYPE VEND OL  DATE    FP   DATE 34  50267 Fort St Vrain               OR  HTG   GA  12/21/73     12/21/73 35  50305 Kewaunee                    OR  PWR   WE  12/21/73     12/21/73 36  50298 Cooper Station              OR  BWR   GE  01/18/74    01/18/74 37  50331 Duane Arnold                OR  BWR   GE  O2/22/74    02/22/74 38  50282 Prairie Island 1            OR  PWR   WE  04/05/74    04/05/74 39  50289 TMI 1                       OR  PWR   BW  04/19/74    04/19/74 40  50278 Peach Bottom 3              OR  BWR   GE  07/02/74    07/02/74 41  50287 Oconee 3                    OR  PWR   BW  07/19/74    07/19/74 42  50317 Calvert Cliffs 1            OR  PWR   CE  07/31/74    07/31/74 43  50260 Browns Ferry 2              OR  BWR   GE  08/02/74    08/02/74 44  50312 Rancho Seco 1               OR  PWR   BW  08/16/74    08/16/74 45  50321 Hatch 1         -

OR BWR GE 10/13/74 10/13/74 46 50333 Fit: patrick OR BWR GE 10/17/74 10/17/74 47 50315 Cook 1 OR PWR WE 10/25/74 10/25/74 48 50306 Prairie Island 2 OR PWR WE 10/29/74 10/29/74 49 50313 Arkansas 1 OR PWR BW 12/01/74 12/01/74 50 50324 Brunswick 2 OR BWR GE 12/27/74 12/27/74

     '51 50336 Millstone 2                  OR  PWR   CE  09/30/75    09/30/75 52 50344 Trojan                       OR  PWR   WE  11/21/75     11/21/75 53 50335 St Lucie 1                   OR  PWR   CE  03/01/76    03/01/76 54 50286 Indian Point 3               OR  PWR   WE  04/05/76    04/05/76 55 50334 Beaver Valley 1              OR  PWR   WE  07/02/76    07/02/76 56 50325 Brunswick 1                  OR  BWR   GE  11/12/76     11/12/76 57 50296 Browns Ferry 3               OR  BWR   GE  11/12/76     11/12/76 58 50318 Calvert Cliffs 2             OR  PWR   CE  11/30/76     11/30/76 59 50272 Salem 1                      OR' PWR   WE  12/01/76     12/01/76 60 50302 Crystal River 3              OR  PWR   BW  01/28/77    01/28/77 61 50346 Davis-Besse 1                OR  PWR   BW  04/22/77    04/22/77 62 50348 Farley 1                     OR  PWR   WE  06/25/77    06/25/77 63 50316 Cook 2                       OR  PWR   WE  12/23/77     12/23/77 64 50338 North Anna 1                 OR  PWR   WE  04/01/78    04/01/78 65 50366 Hatch 2                      OR  BWR   GE  06/13/78    06/13/78 66 50368 Arkansas 2                   OR  PWR   CE  12/14/78     12/14/78 67 50327 Sequoyah 1                   OR  PWR   WE  O2/29/80    09/17/80 60 50339 North Anna 2                 OR  PWR   WE  04/11/80    08/21/80 39 50311 Salem 2                      OR  PWR   WE  04/13/80    05/20/81 70 50364 Farley 2                     OR  PWR   WE  10/23/80    03/31/01 71 50369 McGuire 1                    OR  PWR   WE  06/12/81    07/08/01 72 50328 Sequoyah 2                   OR  PWR   WE  06/25/81    09/15/81 73 50361 San Onofre 2                 OR  PWR   CE  O2/16/82    09/07/82 74 50373 La Salle 1                   OR  BWR   GE  04/17/02    08/13/82 75 50416 Grand Gulf 1                 OR  BWR   GE  06/16/82     11/01/84 76 50387 Susquehanna 1                OR  BWR   GE  07/17/82     11/12/82 77 50395 Summer 1                     OR  PWR   WE  08/06/82     11/12/02 78 50362 San Onofre 3                 OR  PWR   CE  11/15/82     09/16/03 79 50370 McGuire 2                    OR  PWR   WE  03/03/83     05/27/03 88 NOTE:   THIS REPORT IS NOT COMPLETE IF THE COVER / NOTES PAGE IS MISSING i

i

N

O O PLANTS SORTED BY STAGE & OL DATE (Continued) 08/11/86 3 DOCKET PLANT STGE TYPE VEND OL DATE FP DATE 80 50389 St Lucie 2 OR PWR CE 04/06/83 06/10/83 ,

81 50374 La Salle 2 .OR BWR GE 12/16/83 03/23/84 82 50397 WNP-2 OR BWR GE 12/20/83 04/13/84 83 50388 Susquehanna 2 OR BWR GE 03/23/84 06/27/84 84 50275 Diablo Canyon 1 OR .PWR WE 04/19/84 11/02/04 85 50483 Callaway 1 OR PWR WE 06/11/84 10/18/84 86 50352 Limerick 1 OR BWR GE 10/26/84 08/08/85 87 50454 Byron 1 OR PWR WE 10/31/84 02/14/85 88 50413 Catawba 1 OR PWR WE 12/06/84 01/17/85 89 50302 Waterford 3 OR PWR CE 12/18/84 03/16/85 90 50528 Palo Verde 1 ' OR PWR CE 12/31/84 06/01/85 91 50482 Wolf Creek 1 OR PWR WE 03/11/85 06/04/85 92 50341 Fermi 2 OR BWR GE 03/20/05 07/15/85 93 50323 Diablo Canyon 2 OR PWR WE 04/26/85 08/26/85 94 50322 Shoreham i OR BWR GE 07/03/85 01/01/99 N 95 50458 River Bend 1 OR BWR GE 08/29/85 11/20/85 96 50423 Millstone 3 OR PWR WE 11/25/85 01/31/86 97 50529 Palo Verde 2 OR PWR CE 12/09/85 04/24/G6 99 50414 Catawba 2 OR PWR WE O2/24/86 05/16/86 99 50440 Perry 1 OR BWR GE 03/18/G6 09/05/86 E 100 50354 Hope Creek OR BWR GE 04/11/86 07/25/86 C/0,1( M 7 m 4-a. 9 a OP Pns. 1 50410 Nine Mile Point 2 CW BWR GE 08/15/86 E M-1 /30/86 E 2 50461 Clinton 1 CW BWR GE 08/10/86 E 11/15/86 E 3 50400 Harris 1 CW PWR WE 08/25/86 E 10/25/86 E 4 50456 Braidwood 1 CW PWR WE 09/30/86 E 11/30/86 E 5 50455 Byron 2 CW PWR WE 10/01/86 E 12/01/86 E 6 50443 Seabrook 1 CW PWR WE 10/30/86 E 01/01/99 E

     ~ 7 50424     Vogtle 1            CW   PWR    WE     12/01/86 E    12/01/86 E 8 50530   Palo Verde 3        CW   PWR    CE    03/01/87  E   05/01/87  E 9 50390   Watts Bar 1         CW   PWR    WE    03/31/87  E   05/31/87  E 10  50412   Beaver Valley 2     CW   PWR    WE    04/01/87  E   06'/01/87 E 11  50498   South Texas 1       CW   PWR    WE    06/01/87  E    08/01/87 E 12  50391   Watts Bar 2         CW   PWR    WE    09/30/87  E    11/30/87  E i

13 50445 Comanche Peak 1 CW PWR WE 12/31/87 E O2/28/98 E 14 50457 Braidwood 2 CW PWR WE 01/31/88 E 03/31/88 E 15 50425 Vogtle 2 CW PWR WE 03/01/88 E 03/01/88 E 16 50446 Comanche Peak 2 CW PWR WE

• 06/30/08 E 08/31/88 E 17 50499 South Texas 2 CW PWR WE 12/01/88 E O2/01/89 E 18 50353 Limerick 2 CW BWR GE 04/01/90 E 05/01/90 E 19 50438 Bellefonte 1 CW PWR BW 01/31/93 E 01/31/93 E 20 50439 Bellefonte 2 CW PWR BW 01/31/95 E 01/31/95 E 21 50460 WNP-1 CW PWR BW 01/01/99 N 01/01/99 N

     ** NOTE:    THIS REPORT IS NOT COMPLETE IF THE COVER / NOTES PAGE IS MISSING W:

l JU

~. /.

                                                        <o                                              9                                           1
                   . PLANTS SORTED BY STAGE & OL DATE (Continued) 08/11/06                                                   4 DOCKET          PLANT                 STGE         TYPE' VEND          OL           DATE         FP    DATE 22         50508       WNP-3                   CW          PWR       CE        01/01/99          N      01/01/99          N     ,

23 50417 Grand Gulf 2 CW BWR GE 01/01/99 N 01/01/99 N 1- 24 50441 Perry-2 CW BWR GE 01/01/99 N 01/01/99 N , 25 50444 Seabrook 2 CW PWR WE 01/01/99 N 01/01/99 N , NO. OF PMs: 1 50329 Midland 1 CD. PWR BW 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 2 50330' Midland 2 CD PWR BW 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 3 50426 Vogtle 3 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 4 50554 Phipps Bend 2- CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C , 5 50427 Vogtle 4 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 6 50518 Hartsville Al CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 7 50435 Surry 4 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 8 50519 Hartsville A2 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 9.50485 Sterling 1 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 10 50520 Hartsville B1 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C. 01/01/99 C 11 50516 Jamesport 1 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C , 12 50521 Hartsville B2 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C

13 50367 Bailly 1 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 14 50404 North Anna 3 CD PWR BW 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C i 15 50402 Harris 3 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 16 50401 Harris 2 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 3

17 50355 Hope Creek 2 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C

18 50459 River Bend 2 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C

, 19 50509 WNP-5 CD PWR CE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C ^ 20 50566 Yellow Creek 1 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 21 50434 Surry 3 CD PWR- WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 22 50567 Yellow Creek 2 CD BWR GE 01/01/99-C 01/01/99 C 23 50405 North Anna 4 CD PWR BW 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 24 50546 Marble Hill 1 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 25 50486 Callaway 2 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C i 26 50054 Marble Hill 2 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 27 50513 WNP-4 CD PWR BW 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C i 28 50484 Tyrone 1 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 29 50517 Jamesport 2 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 30 50403 Harris 4 CD PWR WE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 31 50553 Phipps Bend 1 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C ,01/01/99 C 32 50462 Clinton 2 CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 33 50350 Zimmer CD BWR GE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C , i 34 50491 Cherokee 1 CD PWR CE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 35 50492 Cherokee 2 CD PWR CE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C 36 50493 Cherokee 3 CD PWR CE 01/01/99 C 01/01/99 C TOTAL PLANT COUNT: 164 , i i pred2/ 3 i

                                                                                                                                    .-Et

      '.:                               LO                                         O Y

4 JUL 0 71996 MEMORANDUM FOR: Files FROM: C. James Holloway, Jr., Acting Director License Fee Management Staff, ADM

SUBJECT:

REACTOR INSPECTION LICENSING AND PART 55 FEES ASSESSED FOR ONE-YEAR PERIOD The enclosure is a listing of those ninety licensed power reactors that were billed for routine and reactive inspections, licensing actions and Part 55 examinations during the one-year period of June 24, 1984 through June 22,1985. The listing is in descending order according to the licensed megawatt thermal level of each reactor. Although there were seven other reactors that were licensed during the period, they were not in operation a full year and have not been included in the listing. The seven reactors are Palo Verde 1. Diablo Canyon 2, Wolf Creek 1 Waterford 3. Limerick 1 Femi 2 and Shoreham.

                                                           '81gief. C. J : g gg. 8% h C. James Holloway, Jr.
'                                                         Acting Director License Fee Management Staff Office of Administration

Enclosure:

As stated DISTRIBUTION w/ enc 1: CJHolloway DWeiss RMDiggs LShea GJackson messier RFonner, ELD RSmith, ELD TRothschild. OGC Scrockett,OGC LFMS R/F Insp. Fee File PRowe, ADM l DW/CJH/ Files OFFICE :LFM5:ADM SURNAME :CJ oway:jp  : BAft' 27/ 186  :'

                                              ,                                           ,. . - 37. . .
                                                                                                  /

      .             ..                           h                                         h e,. .

Enclosure j Total Inspection. Licensing and Part 55 Fees l For One-Year Period June 1984 - June 1985 . Operating Power Reactors Total Total Total Licensed Inspection Amendment Part 55 Total Reactor El Thermal O Fees Fees Fees Fees

1. Grand Gulf 1 3,833 $283,915 $56,411 $45,041 $385,367

2. Byron 1 3,411 281,683 1,204 723 283,610 3,411 238,749 56,482 36,160 331,391

3. Callaway 1

4. Catawba 1 3,411 260,052 19,963 10,687 290,702

5. Cook 2 3,411 133,051 29,608 17, % 7 180,626

6. McGuire 1 3,411 180,957 39,990 58.294 279,241

7. McGuire 2 3,411 158,854 40,796 387 200,037

8. Salem 2 3,411 153,781 15,934 -- 169,715

9. Sequoyah 1 3,411 155,241 34,560 66,043 255,844

10. Sequoyah 2 3,411 157.743 21,700 -- 179,443

11. Trojan 3.411 238,674 29,822 42,741 311,237

12. San Onofre 2 3,410 111.422 52,279 41,980 205,681

13. San Onofre 3 3,390 99,807 28,285 7,791 135,883

14. Diablo Canyon 1 3,338 243,508 47,993 88,608 380,109

15. Salem 1 3,338 148,223 11,532 1,711 161,466

16. LaSalle 1 3.323 124,136 28,565 46,778 199,479

17. LaSalle 2 3,323 132,372 37,181 11,305 180,858

18. WNP-2 3,323 253,960 48,562 70,392 372,914

19. Browns Ferry 1 3,293 170,208 25,278 27.306 222,792

20. Browns Ferry 2 3,293 77,671 23,294 9,823 110,788

21. Browns Ferry 3 3,293 104,381 11,390 9,823 125,594

22. Peach Bottom 2 3,293 207,587 19,499 33,811 260,897 23 Peach Bottom 3 3,293 103.173 16,957 2,021 122,151

24. Susquehanna 1 3,293 183.154 76,043 63,785 322,982

25. Susquehanna 2 3,293 140,859 36,983 -- 177,842

26. Cook 1 3,250 139,734 45,151 59,197 244,082

27. Zion 1 3,250 159,750 31,901 28,481 220,131

28. Zion 2 3,250 126,970 28,416 3,789 159,17!

29. Indian Point 3 3,025 191,945 44,423 38,762 275,13(

30. Arkansas Nuclear 1-2 2,815 103.161 51.162 25,671 179,994 l 31. North Anna 1 2,775 138,257 9,796 47,494 195,54'

32. North Anna 2 2,775 113,931 31,744 17.574 163,24' l 33. Summer 1 2,775 235,623 57,713 94,557 387,89  !

34. Davis-8 esse 1 2,772 341,250 54,981 15,259 411,49

35. Rancho Seco 2.772 296,129 56,352 31,378 383.85 230,572 U i

36. TMI-2 2,772 177.988 13,069 421,62

37. Indian Point 2 2.758 167,186 83,441 12.413 263,04

38. Calvert Cliffs 1 2,700 140,934 47,027 26,638 214.59

                                                                   .                                      a .

x .s.4 .c 2 .

 .:             .                                           O                                                                                                             O I

E Total Total Total Licensed Inspection Amendment Part 55 Total Reactor MW Therma 10 Fees __ _ Fees Fees Fees

39. Calvert Cliffs 2 2,700 $ 84,126 $21.091 $ 1,203 $106,420

40. Millstone 2 2,700 104.126 23,708 62,644 190,478

41. St. Lucie 1 2,700 124,442 10,157 74,027 208,626

42. St. Lucie 2 2,700 146,305 13,404 -- 159,709

43. 8eaver Valley 1 2.660 203,563 34,041 113.430 351,034

44. Farley 1 2.652 169,235 14.273 69,011 252,519

45. Farley 2 2.652 136,831 12.183 -- 149,014

46. Maine Yankee 2,630 186,755 21,275 28,928 236,958

47. Arkansas Nuclear I-l 2,568 108,594 70,970 53,928 233,492

48. Oconee 1 2,568 108,7 % 27,962 65,102 201,860

49. Oconee 2 2,568 88,948 46,834 542 136,324

50. .Oconee 3 2,568 70, % 9 17.019 542 88,530

51. Crystal River 3 2,544 305,936 93,713 122,682 522.331

52. THI-1 2,535 255,132 28,615 71,199 354,946

53. Palisades 2.530 237,748 16,616 74,958 329,322

54. Dresden 2 2,527 147,576 36,270 24,904 208,750

55. Dresden 3 2,527 98,196 15,872 10,365 124.433

56. Quad Cities 1 2,511 121,582 7,967 33,968 163,517

57. Quad Cities 2 2,511 128,906 13.578 2,430 144,914

58. Surry 1 2,441 134,887 8,064 37.667 180,61E

59. Surry 2 2,441 140,256 9,636 6,968 156,86C ,

60. Brunswick 1 2,436 157,224 32,007 35,565 224,79(

61. 8runswick 2 ' 2,436 121,368 12,272 16.341 149,981

62. Fitzpatrick 2,436 199,700 43,524 23,438 266,662

63. Hatch 1 2,436 150,672 29,233 90,044 269,945

64. Hatch 2 2,436 128,559 33,232 45,550 207,341

65. Cooper 2,381 270,644 40,032 43,891 354,56;

66. Robinson 2 2,300 334,926 60,481 55,130 450,53:

67. Turkey Point 3 2,200 134,014 41,946 38,272 214.23'

68. Turkey Point 4 2,200 118,541 16,867 931 136.33! l

69. Millstone 1 2,011 65,221 6,882 6,286 78,38' I

70. Pilgrim 1 1,998 285.563 39,519 49,706 374,78;

71. Oyster Creek 1,930 242,768 27,770 36,592 307,13 E- I J

                 , , ;s ,q ,                                 ' a . :;,ic i '            <                                                                            . ;. dhs. -

          .                                   O                                                                                                                                                               O f

l l l 3 > 1 1 l t Total Total Total  ! Licensed Inspection Amendment Part 55 Total  ; El Therma 1 Y Fees Fees Fees Fees Reactor .

                                                                                                        $149,617                                                                            $22,325                  $84,078                   $256,020

72. Nine Mile Point 1 1,850 137,309 23,777 91,762 252,848

73. Haddam Neck 1,825 181,881 23,002 42,183 247,066

74. Monticello 1,670 305,807 1,658 137,542 132,415 35,790

75. Duane Arnold 52,309 19,738 226,806

76. Kewaunee ~1,650 154.759 105,515 29,202 71,033 205,750

77. Prairie Island 1 1,650 127,654 1,650 99,697 22,847 5,110

78. Prairie Island 2 179,432 29,456 7,063 215,951

79. Vennont Yankee 1.593 52,913 200,971 1,520 124,002 24,056

80. Ginna 117,800 6,619 25,000 149,419

81. Point Beach 1 1,518 106,935 6,123 5.761 118,819

82. Point Beach 2 1,518 20.367 41,050 200,924

83. Fort Calhoun 1,500 139.507 278,192 31,495 81,257 390,944

84. San Onofre 1 1,347 234,009 269,475 19,688 523,172

85. Fort St. Vrain 842 27,823p -- 174 27,997

86. Dresden 1 700 204,317 1,736 13,187 219,240

87. Yankee Rowe 600 113,399 13.563 19,293 146,255

88. Big Rock Point 240

89. Humboldt Bay 220 21.650 U 114.543 -- 136,193 110,843 4,774 9,940 125,557

90. Lacrosse 165 248,030 $14,664,941 $3.285,563 $3,028,723 $20,979,227 MSturce - NUREG-0871 Summary Infonnation Report dated October 1985.

N Has an operating license but shut down indefinitely. l l 1 E ' !- 9

                                                                                                                                                                                                                     . -. ~ , . .

O O FY 1987 Estimated Collections / Billings Part 170 - 6/20/84. Revised Schedule Estimates As of 7/29/86 ($inthousands) i Estimated FY 1987 FACILITIES PROGRAM Collections / Billings Power Reactor Operating Licenses Amendments $4,700 Part 55 Exams & Certifications 3,600 Inspections 22,000 Subtotal - Operating Licenses $30,300 Applications (OL's under review) 3,100 Special Projects (Topicals) 300 Non Power Reactors (Amendments, Part 55 & Inspections) 50 Subtotal - Other $3,450 Total - Facilities Program $33,750 MATERIALS PROGRAM Licensing $2,000 Inspection 1,300 Total - Materials Program $3,300 TOTAL - FY 1987 ESTIMATE $37,050 Rounded to $37 million p-l}}